Re: [Orgmode] Another GTD question.
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Oct 22, 2006, at 2:39, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > >> ... but I don't know one aspect of Org that I hope is maintained. >> It's really flexible. Kind of like perl. It has a lot of little >> nifty features that you can use to manage and organize information (to >> tasks, or whatever) and use can use any subset you want. You can >> learn it incrementally. (...as I have. It sound popular but I >> haven't even touched the publishing...) None of the features really >> require the use of any other feature except maybe agenda and agenda is >> just a flexible interface for gathering the information marked and >> managed by the other features. (Dates, tags, Todo state...) Yet all >> of the features work well together. There's more that one way to do >> most things. > > I am smiling happily at this description, it reflects very much of > what I am trying to do with org-mode. > > - Carsten I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from emacs-muse or planner, etc. Especially various export formats and more text markups? Xiao-Yong -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Another GTD question.
On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:21, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote: I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from emacs-muse or planner, etc. Especially various export formats and more text markups? In this generality: no. The focus of muse is publishing, and that is not the focus of org-mode. So blindly taking over more features is nothing I'd like to do. If you have specific things you'd find particularly useful, and if you take the time to describe exactly how they should work instead of expecting me to do that, you chances are much better :-) - Carsten ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Another GTD question.
On 10/23/06, Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Oct 22, 2006, at 2:39, Eddward DeVilla wrote: > ... but I don't know one aspect of Org that I hope is maintained. > It's really flexible. Kind of like perl. It has a lot of little wow. Can you tell I was sleep deprived. I *do* know one aspect I hope is maintained. I thought I even proof read that. I'm afraid to go back and read the rest. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Another GTD question.
Carsten Dominik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Oct 23, 2006, at 9:21, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote: > >> I'm wondering if you could absorb all the nifty features from >> emacs-muse or planner, etc. Especially various export formats and >> more text markups? > > In this generality: no. > > The focus of muse is publishing, and that is not the focus of > org-mode. So blindly taking over more features is nothing I'd like to > do. If you have specific things you'd find particularly useful, and > if you take the time to describe exactly how they should work instead > of expecting me to do that, you chances are much better :-) No, I can't think of any now. It just works fantastic so far. Xiao-Yong -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
