Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng
On 3/7/19 2:00 AM, wirelessduck--- via Dng wrote:
> 
> I get nothing listed when running 'w' and 'who'. Checking output of 'last' 
> shows the reboot time correctly but my slim login doesn’t appear at all.

same here. w used to work with lightdm. tty logins still show normally.
also tried with procps/ceres (downgrade from beowulf), but that made no
difference.

lastlog also doesn't show any user logins since 30/1.. (right after
policykit upgrade -
https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20190131.103118.c6fc512b.en.html )
policykit installed version : 0.105-25+devuan1
elogind installed version : 239.3+20190131-1

is there a bug report for this yet?
(will probably try consolekit again, just to check if it makes any
difference)


d.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread KatolaZ
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
> On 3/7/19 2:00 AM, wirelessduck--- via Dng wrote:
> > 
> > I get nothing listed when running 'w' and 'who'. Checking output of 'last' 
> > shows the reboot time correctly but my slim login doesn’t appear at all.
> 
> same here. w used to work with lightdm. tty logins still show normally.
> also tried with procps/ceres (downgrade from beowulf), but that made no
> difference.
> 
> lastlog also doesn't show any user logins since 30/1.. (right after
> policykit upgrade -
> https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20190131.103118.c6fc512b.en.html )
> policykit installed version : 0.105-25+devuan1
> elogind installed version : 239.3+20190131-1
> 
> is there a bug report for this yet?
> (will probably try consolekit again, just to check if it makes any
> difference)

Could somebody plese file a bug report on bugs.devuan.org?

Thanks

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Further on this:

I've also got a dist-upgraded beowulf with a no-install-recommends
installation of task-xfce-desktop, and this one is fine wrt 'w'/'last'
report for slim using consolekt, and still fine when I downgraded
consolekit to the ascii version. The newest 'slim' is fine btw.

A little bit of digging tells me that my laptop has XDG_SESSION_COOKIE
set which my beowulf VM doesn't. That difference might be enough to
steer things differently for /etc/X11/Xsession.d/90consolekit, which (by
guesswork) has a significant decision point about the session startup.
Basically, X startup only runs /usr/bin/ck-launch-session if the
variable is unset (at that time).

Someone who knows stuff might kindly pull me right, but now I'm chasing
the reason why may latop gets XDG_SESSION_COOKIE set (while my beowulf
VM doesn't)...

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Mark Hindley
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 11:07:41AM +0200, Dimitris via Dng wrote:
> On 3/7/19 2:00 AM, wirelessduck--- via Dng wrote:
> > 
> > I get nothing listed when running 'w' and 'who'. Checking output of 'last' 
> > shows the reboot time correctly but my slim login doesn’t appear at all.
> 
> same here. w used to work with lightdm. tty logins still show normally.
> also tried with procps/ceres (downgrade from beowulf), but that made no
> difference.
> 
> lastlog also doesn't show any user logins since 30/1.. (right after
> policykit upgrade -
> https://lists.dyne.org/lurker/message/20190131.103118.c6fc512b.en.html )
> policykit installed version : 0.105-25+devuan1
> elogind installed version : 239.3+20190131-1
> 
> is there a bug report for this yet?
> (will probably try consolekit again, just to check if it makes any
> difference)

Thanks for these reports. I think there are 2 separate things going on here:

You are right that elogind doesn't seem to be updating lastlog.

I think this is a different issue from the slim logins not being
registered. This seems to be long standing and unreleated to elogind/consolekit.

I can reproduce both.

Would you open separate bugs please?

Thanks

Mark
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng


Mark Hindley wrote on 7/3/19 8:38 pm:

> Thanks for these reports. I think there are 2 separate things going on here:
> 
> You are right that elogind doesn't seem to be updating lastlog.
> 
> I think this is a different issue from the slim logins not being
> registered. This seems to be long standing and unreleated to 
> elogind/consolekit.
> 
> I can reproduce both.
> 
> Would you open separate bugs please?

I'm lodging one about 'slim logins not being registered' right now...

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng
On 3/7/19 11:38 AM, Mark Hindley wrote:
> You are right that elogind doesn't seem to be updating lastlog.

too busy right now, will file this bug report later today if nobody else
does.

thanks,
d



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:43:05AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> 
> 
> KatolaZ wrote on 7/3/19 9:30 am:
> > Bug report to bugs.devuan.org, please. This is something we definitely
> > need to pin down and fix. Thanks Ralph!
> 
> Yes, though I just discovered it on my system, and whilst I believe it's
> a plain, dist-upgraded ascii with a well-defined couple of variations,
> I've also "fixed things"(tm).
> 
> Does anyone else have bogus 'w'/'last' reports?

How does one obtain 'w'/'last' reports?

-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] PHP 7.1

2019-03-07 Thread swdev via Dng
Hi there

I am running devuan ascii

lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Devuan
Description: Devuan GNU/Linux 2.0 (ascii)
Release: 2.0
Codename: ascii

uname -a
Linux jrlp02 4.9.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 4.9.144-3.1 (2019-02-19) x86_64
GNU/Linux

I currently have php 7.0 installed

php --version
PHP 7.0.33-0+deb9u2 (cli) (built: Feb 25 2019 23:13:19) ( NTS )
Copyright (c) 1997-2017 The PHP Group
Zend Engine v3.0.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2017 Zend Technologies
with Zend OPcache v7.0.33-0+deb9u2, Copyright (c) 1999-2017, by Zend
Technologies


I want to install php 7.1.3 (or later) as a tool that I want to run (grav -
a simple website builder) requires at least php 7.1.3

bin/grav --help
You are running PHP 7.0.33-0+deb9u2, but Grav needs at least PHP 7.1.3 to
run.


Is there any way to install php 7.1.3? I can't see it in the repositories.

My sources.list

cat sources.list
## package repositories
#deb http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii main
#deb http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-updates main
#deb http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-security main
#deb http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-backports main

deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii main
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-updates main
deb http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-security main

## source repositories
#deb-src http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii main
#deb-src http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-updates main
#deb-src http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-security main
#deb-src http://pkgmaster.devuan.org/merged ascii-backports main
#deb-src http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii main
#deb-src http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-updates main
#deb-src http://deb.devuan.org/merged ascii-security main

Thans
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Antony Stone
On Thursday 07 March 2019 at 13:27:10, Hendrik Boom wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:43:05AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> > 
> > Does anyone else have bogus 'w'/'last' reports?
> 
> How does one obtain 'w'/'last' reports?

1. Type "w"; you should get something like:

# w
 12:55:35 up  2:22,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.11
USER TTY  FROM LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU WHAT
root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 10:330.00s  0.01s  0.00s w

2. Type "last"; you should get something like:

# last
root pts/1198.51.100.56 Thu Mar  7 12:04 - 12:05  (00:00)
root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 Thu Mar  7 10:33   still logged in   
reboot   system boot  3.2.0-5-amd64Thu Mar  7 10:33 - 12:56  (02:22)
root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 Thu Mar  7 10:08 - 10:31  (00:23)
root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 Thu Feb 28 16:22 - 11:20 (2+18:58)   


:)

Antony.

-- 
Wanted: telepath.   You know where to apply.

   Please reply to the list;
 please *don't* CC me.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] PHP 7.1

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng
On 3/7/19 2:53 PM, swdev via Dng wrote:
> Is there any way to install php 7.1.3? I can't see it in the repositories.

you need 3rd party repo for that. check this thread :
https://dev1galaxy.org/viewtopic.php?id=2698
and use at your own risk :)





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] PHP 7.1

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng
btw, devuan beowulf repo has php7.3



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 01:58:03PM +0100, Antony Stone wrote:
> On Thursday 07 March 2019 at 13:27:10, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 09:43:05AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> > > 
> > > Does anyone else have bogus 'w'/'last' reports?
> > 
> > How does one obtain 'w'/'last' reports?
> 
> 1. Type "w"; you should get something like:
> 
> # w
>  12:55:35 up  2:22,  1 user,  load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.11
> USER TTY  FROM LOGIN@   IDLE   JCPU   PCPU WHAT
> root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 10:330.00s  0.01s  0.00s w
> 
> 2. Type "last"; you should get something like:
> 
> # last
> root pts/1198.51.100.56 Thu Mar  7 12:04 - 12:05  (00:00)
> root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 Thu Mar  7 10:33   still logged in   
> reboot   system boot  3.2.0-5-amd64Thu Mar  7 10:33 - 12:56  (02:22)
> root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 Thu Mar  7 10:08 - 10:31  (00:23)
> root pts/0xdsl-78-34-235-1 Thu Feb 28 16:22 - 11:20 (2+18:58)   
> 
Yes, that's the kind of stuff I see, though I get a few more messages about
the reboots I did.  So it works on ascii.  But that was never in doubt, was it?
And I'm using lightdm.

Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary 
user on a laptop?  Except maybe a few quirks like the one we're now 
debugging?  If so I'll upgrade soon and look for problems.  I'd prefer not 
to have to downgrade or reinstall if my system becomes unusable.

-- hendrik

___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread KatolaZ
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:13:01AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:

[cut]

> 
> Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary 
> user on a laptop?  Except maybe a few quirks like the one we're now 
> debugging?  If so I'll upgrade soon and look for problems.  I'd prefer not 
> to have to downgrade or reinstall if my system becomes unusable.
>

Define "ordinary user on a laptop". I have been using beowulf since
about 8 months ago on my laptop, and haven't experience any major
breakage (but I should probably also definne "major breakage"
here). My impression is that beowulf is pretty usable, but I am not
running a DE so my experience does not cover session-related automagic
goodies.

It would be great if more people would actually move on beowulf as
soon as possible, so that we can identify as many glitches as possible
and put together a beta of beowulf.

HND

KatolaZ

-- 
[ ~.,_  Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ - Devuan -- Freaknet Medialab  ]  
[ "+.  katolaz [at] freaknet.org --- katolaz [at] yahoo.it  ]
[   @)   http://kalos.mine.nu ---  Devuan GNU + Linux User  ]
[ @@)  http://maths.qmul.ac.uk/~vnicosia --  GPG: 0B5F062F  ] 
[ (@@@)  Twitter: @KatolaZ - skype: katolaz -- github: KatolaZ  ]


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Dimitris via Dng

>> You are right that elogind doesn't seem to be updating lastlog.

submitted bug report #302 minutes ago.

thanks,
d.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 07/03/19 at 08:38, Edward Bartolo via Dng wrote:
> It uses instead ifconfig, iwconfig, wpa_supplicant and
> dhclient.

  Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place
of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig:

https://serverfault.com/questions/458628/should-i-quit-using-ifconfig

https://access.redhat.com/solutions/1194553

iwconfig was developed by Jean Tourrilhes at HP, and it uses Linux
Wireless Extensions from the same author, which have been log deprecated:

http://linuxwireless.sipsolutions.net/en/developers/Documentation/Wireless-Extensions/#Is_WE_being_further_developed_.3F




-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:
>   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place
> of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig:

The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the
programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither. You may well have your
reasons to like other programs to achieve the functions offered by
ifconfig and iwconfig, but that does not make ifconfig and iwconfig be
neither obsolete nor deprecated.

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:
>>   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place
>> of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig:
> The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the
> programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither.


  Yes, they are.  They are pending removal from several (all?) major
distributions, some already removed them years ago, and they receive
little development, mostly just security patches.


>  You may well have your
> reasons to like other programs to achieve the functions offered by
> ifconfig and iwconfig, but that does not make ifconfig and iwconfig be
> neither obsolete nor deprecated.


  They are both, and I provided with pointers to explain why they are.

You are of course free to ignore facts.  We do live in a free society.


-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng


Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 8:05 am:
> On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
>> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:
>>>   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place
>>> of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig:
>> The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the
>> programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither.
> 
> 
>   Yes, they are.  They are pending removal from several (all?) major
> distributions, some already removed them years ago, and they receive
> little development, mostly just security patches.


ifconfig and iwconfig are useful programs. They work well without
needing constant development; security patches are good.

>>  You may well have your
>> reasons to like other programs to achieve the functions offered by
>> ifconfig and iwconfig, but that does not make ifconfig and iwconfig be
>> neither obsolete nor deprecated.
> 
> 
>   They are both, and I provided with pointers to explain why they are.
> 
> You are of course free to ignore facts.  We do live in a free society.


"facts" ??

It is a fact that ifconfig and iwconfig are useful programs. They work
well without needing constant development; security patches are good.

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 07/03/19 at 22:18, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
>
> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 8:05 am:
>> On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
>>> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:
   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place
 of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig:
>>> The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the
>>> programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither.
>>
>>   Yes, they are.  They are pending removal from several (all?) major
>> distributions, some already removed them years ago, and they receive
>> little development, mostly just security patches.
>
> ifconfig and iwconfig are useful programs.


  I did not write they are useless.  I wrote that they are obsolete and
deprecated.


>  They work well without
> needing constant development; security patches are good.


  They are limited, they suffer shortcomings, they are not getting new
code to keep in pace with modern networking evolution.  ifconfig does
not handle well multiple ip's to the same interface, is limited to
32-bit counters when the kernel has long been using 64 bit counters,
does not support/detect the latest queue disciplines, they are stuck to
old networking APIs that are ill suited to handle tunneling, VLAN,
traffic shaping, control and security extensions and many features that
are key to such things as Software Defined Networking.


>>>  You may well have your
>>> reasons to like other programs to achieve the functions offered by
>>> ifconfig and iwconfig, but that does not make ifconfig and iwconfig be
>>> neither obsolete nor deprecated.
>>
>>   They are both, and I provided with pointers to explain why they are.
>>
>> You are of course free to ignore facts.  We do live in a free society.
>
> "facts" ??
>
> It is a fact that ifconfig and iwconfig are useful programs.


  Again, I did not write they are useless.  They still are useful if you
only you do basic networking stuff (though they are mot more useful than
the new tools at that).  But they lack support for the most modern and
advanced features of the Linux kernel networking stack.


>  They work
> well without needing constant development;


  They lack support for advanced features that have been present in the
kernel for many years because nobody bothered to update them.  New
development all goes into ip and iw.


>  security patches are good.


  That's the reason they have not yet been dropped by many
distributions, even though all major ones no longer depend on them for
anything critical, like boot time networking configuration (Debian took
them away from sysv init scripts before they switched to systemd).

  These are facts.

  Now, other than emotional, personal and irrational reasons, what
technical motives push you to still use those old, obsolete, limited and
deprecated tools when you've been having available newer ones that are
much superior and are just as easy to use?



-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 07:22:37AM +1100, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:
> >   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in place
> > of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and iwconfig:
> 
> The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the
> programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither. You may well have your
> reasons to like other programs to achieve the functions offered by
> ifconfig and iwconfig, but that does not make ifconfig and iwconfig be
> neither obsolete nor deprecated.

Yes, they're not the appropriate words.  You'd want "ancient to the point of
near-uselessness" and "about to be removed".

ifconfig had been replaced 20 years ago.  For compat reasons, it had been
kept around for way, way longer than it should -- and the time to finally
pull the plug is long overdue.

It can still do some simple tasks, but tools newer than middle stone age can
do everything ifconfig can.


An analogy would be soviet-style AC plug (round, with two pins).  They may
work in some basic setups, but otherwise not only fail at important
functionality (grounding in this case) but also interfere with _other_ plugs
having grounding.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Have you accepted Khorne as your lord and saviour?
⠈⠳⣄
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


[DNG] Problems with mate-power-manager

2019-03-07 Thread Antonio Trkdz.tab via Dng
Dear All,

I am using ascii with mate on a laptop and recently I switched from
xfce-power-manager (perfectly working) to mate-power-manager from hezeh.org
repo.
Following recommendations from repo mantainer I have also installed
mate-session-manager, mate-control-center and mate-settings-daemon from the
same repo.

So far the battery icon is working as per solution of bug report #240, but
the laptop is not suspending after inactivity (10 min) on battery.
The system is suspending ok when invoked from end session dialog or from
cli, also OK on closing the lid. The system is also suspending according to
settings (30 min) on AC power.

When on battery and left open the screen goes blank, but after 10 minutes,
instead of going into sleep state, it awakes showing the password entry
dialog.

The problem persists also after installing upower version 0.99.10 from
beowulf repos.

This issue is very annoying and It would be great if some of you could help.

Please forgive me if the info are quite generic and don't hesitate to ask
if you need more info or logs.

Thank you all in advance,
Cheers!

Antonio
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng


Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:04 am:
>   I did not write they are useless.  I wrote that they are obsolete and
> deprecated.


Yes. And those terms are badly chosen, because they are neither.

>>  They work well without
>> needing constant development; security patches are good.
> 
>   They are limited, they suffer shortcomings, they are not getting new
> code to keep in pace with modern networking evolution.  ifconfig does
> not handle well multiple ip's to the same interface, is limited to
> 32-bit counters when the kernel has long been using 64 bit counters,
> does not support/detect the latest queue disciplines, they are stuck to
> old networking APIs that are ill suited to handle tunneling, VLAN,
> traffic shaping, control and security extensions and many features that
> are key to such things as Software Defined Networking.


Wanting a program to do things is doesn't is plain stupid.


>   They lack support for advanced features that have been present in the
> kernel for many years because nobody bothered to update them.  New
> development all goes into ip and iw.


see above.


>   Now, other than emotional, personal and irrational reasons, what
> technical motives push you to still use those old, obsolete, limited and
> deprecated tools when you've been having available newer ones that are
> much superior and are just as easy to use?


I believe I objected to our choice of words, and not your reasons for
insisting on using those words, or your reasons for wanting these
programs to not be used. Like many people, you are free to use whichever
programs you may want, and you are free to think that your choice of
programs for your purposes is the One And True choice, even when it
isn't. There is no reason for you to go emotional about it.

The fact remains that ifconfig and iwconfig are neither deprecated nor
obsolete.

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Rick Moen
(Hey, we've had this discussion at least once before.)

Quoting Ralph Ronnquist via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):

> The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the
> programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither. You may well have your
> reasons to like other programs to achieve the functions offered by
> ifconfig and iwconfig, but that does not make ifconfig and iwconfig be
> neither obsolete nor deprecated.

net-tools, source of ifconfig, arp, rarp, netstat, route, hostname,
ethers, ipmaddr, iptunnel, mii-tool, nameif, plipconfig, and slattach, 
last had a release on 2011-10-14.
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-tools/files/)

The perception that it's deprecated is, at minimum, quite widely held, e.g., 
https://www.archlinux.org/news/deprecation-of-net-tools/ .
Ditto obsolete:  https://lwn.net/Articles/710533/

A significant number of newer (but getting old!) kernel features are
inaccessible from the net-tools suie.  Long ago, I had a list of those,
but would have to hunt to re-find it.  The list included source-based
routing, QoS, VLAN, bonding, bridges.

iwconfig is a slightly different case, being not from net-tools but
rather Jean Tourrilhes's Wireless Tools for Linus, a project sponsored
at the time by HP.  That codebase was last released in _2007_, and is
considered deprecated by the kernel coders:
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/documentation/iw/replace-iwconfig

As actress Simone Signoret said as the title to her 1978 memoir, 'La
nostalgie n'est plus ce qu'elle était.'  (Nostalgia isn't what it used
to be.)  Ms. Signoret said she picked up and translated said aphorism from
an inspired bit of NYC graffiti.

-- 
Cheers,You must rise or sink / You must conquer or win, 
Rick Moen  Or serve and lose. / Suffer or triumph, / Be anvil or hammer.
r...@linuxmafia.com 
McQ! (4x80)-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Gesellige Lieder, Ein Anderes 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 07/03/19 at 23:26, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
>
> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:04 am:
>>   I did not write they are useless.  I wrote that they are obsolete and
>> deprecated.
>
> Yes. And those terms are badly chosen, because they are neither.


  They are both, and I explained why they are listing some of the
technically compelling reasons they are considered obsolete and
deprecated by an overwhelming majority of people who maintain distributions.


>>>  They work well without
>>> needing constant development; security patches are good.
>>   They are limited, they suffer shortcomings, they are not getting new
>> code to keep in pace with modern networking evolution.  ifconfig does
>> not handle well multiple ip's to the same interface, is limited to
>> 32-bit counters when the kernel has long been using 64 bit counters,
>> does not support/detect the latest queue disciplines, they are stuck to
>> old networking APIs that are ill suited to handle tunneling, VLAN,
>> traffic shaping, control and security extensions and many features that
>> are key to such things as Software Defined Networking.
>
> Wanting a program to do things is doesn't is plain stupid.


  ip and iw do the "things" (what things?) they were developed to do. 
It's ifconfig and iwconfig which suffer from limitations and shotcomings.


>>   They lack support for advanced features that have been present in the
>> kernel for many years because nobody bothered to update them.  New
>> development all goes into ip and iw.
>
> see above.


  I see you're still stubbornly ignoring facts and fail to explain why.


>>   Now, other than emotional, personal and irrational reasons, what
>> technical motives push you to still use those old, obsolete, limited and
>> deprecated tools when you've been having available newer ones that are
>> much superior and are just as easy to use?
>
> I believe


  Technical matters are not a matter of belief.


> I objected to our choice of words,


  You "believe" things you did?  Don't you even know why yourself did
and said things?


> and not your reasons for
> insisting on using those words,


  I have technically proven and linguistically sound reasons to call
those commands what they are, that is obsolete and deprecated, like an
overwhelming majority of technically minded people do.


> or your reasons for wanting these
> programs to not be used.


  I never tried to impose my will on anybody else.  You're doing a
straw-man attack on me.


> Like many people, you are free to use whichever
> programs you may want, and you are free to think that your choice of
> programs for your purposes is the One And True choice, even when it
> isn't. There is no reason for you to go emotional about it.


  You accused me of intentions I never had, and are still failing at
providing with technical reasons why obsolete, nearly unmaintained,
universally deprecated and way outdated commands are to still be used
today when they do not offer any advantage over the current, maintained,
universally available and much more versatile and powerful and still
easy to use commands that have been available for decades.


> The fact remains that ifconfig and iwconfig are neither deprecated nor
> obsolete.


  They both are, and they've been so for many years.  Major
distributions started dropping them from 2014, if not earlier.


-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:48 am:
>> I believe
> 
>   Technical matters are not a matter of belief.
> 
>> I objected to our choice of words,
> 
>   You "believe" things you did?  Don't you even know why yourself did
> and said things?
> 
>> and not your reasons for
>> insisting on using those words,
> 
>   I have technically proven and linguistically sound reasons to call
> those commands what they are, that is obsolete and deprecated, like an
> overwhelming majority of technically minded people do.
> 
>> or your reasons for wanting these
>> programs to not be used.
> 
>   I never tried to impose my will on anybody else.  You're doing a
> straw-man attack on me.
> 
>> Like many people, you are free to use whichever
>> programs you may want, and you are free to think that your choice of
>> programs for your purposes is the One And True choice, even when it
>> isn't. There is no reason for you to go emotional about it.
> 
>   You accused me of intentions I never had, and are still failing at
> providing with technical reasons why obsolete, nearly unmaintained,
> universally deprecated and way outdated commands are to still be used
> today when they do not offer any advantage over the current, maintained,
> universally available and much more versatile and powerful and still
> easy to use commands that have been available for decades.


It's intriguing to see you get so emotional about this.

Just the other week I opted for using ifconfig because I couldn't work
out the single command for confguring a tap with an IP address, and
bring it up. With ip, I seemed to need 3 commands, so at that time I
liked ifconfig better. It's certainly not obsolete yet. Perhaps there is
a single ip command, and perhaps I can learn it, but that still wouldn't
make ifconfig obsolete.

Though, I realise I should let you call it/them "deprecated"; it may
well be how you think of them even if I don't do that. The word is just
an expression of an opinion about these programs and not an attribute of
them.

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 07/03/19 at 23:26, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 9:04 am:
>>   I did not write they are useless.  I wrote that they are obsolete and
>> deprecated.
>
> Yes. And those terms are badly chosen, because they are neither.


  Please tell us.  When you need to do firewalling, what do you use and why?

1) ipfwadm

2) ipchains

3) iptables


-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 10:56 am:
>   Please tell us.  When you need to do firewalling, what do you use and why?
> 1) ipfwadm
> 2) ipchains
> 3) iptables

I assume you ask me specifically. In most hypotheticals I care to
imagine, I would use iptables, because I believe I know it well enough
to make it do what I would want it to do. Of course, if it'd be for a
Mac powerbook, I would have to sob for at least a week, and then use pf,
probably.

You have a favourite, too?

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 08/03/19 at 00:50, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
>
> It's intriguing to see you get so emotional about this.


  My objections are technically motivated and documented.

  Yours are neither.


> Just the other week I opted for using ifconfig because I couldn't work
> out the single command for confguring a tap with an IP address, and
> bring it up. With ip, I seemed to need 3 commands, so at that time I
> liked ifconfig better.


  Your own failures at using modern tools and your personal preferences
are not technically compelling reasons to consider outdated and
deprecated commands anything different than what they are.


> It's certainly not obsolete yet.


  They surely are, and Rick and myself provided with links to document
this and a list of shortcomings that plague those commands.  You failed
at documenting anything technical to prop up your personal convictions.


>  Perhaps there is
> a single ip command, and perhaps I can learn it, but that still wouldn't
> make ifconfig obsolete.

  Again, your failure/unwillingness at learning modern tools does not
make them bad and does not make deprecated and obsolete commands modern
and up to date.


> Though, I realise I should let you call it/them "deprecated";


  It's not just me, it's many thousand people who do.


>  it may
> well be how you think of them even if I don't do that.


  It's not just that I think they are.  They are considered to be that
way by an overwhelming majority of Linux developers and sysadmins.


> The word is just
> an expression of an opinion about these programs and not an attribute of
> them.
>
> Ralph.


  Still nothing technical about how those commands could be considered
anything different than obsolete and deprecated.  You only have your
personal convictions to show.


  Bye,



-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Adam Borowski
On Fri, Mar 08, 2019 at 12:56:53AM +0100, Alessandro Selli wrote:
>   Please tell us.  When you need to do firewalling, what do you use and why?
> 
> 1) ipfwadm
> 
> 2) ipchains
> 
> 3) iptables

An interesting example you made here...


-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Have you accepted Khorne as your lord and saviour?
⠈⠳⣄
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 08/03/19 at 01:09, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 10:56 am:
>>   Please tell us.  When you need to do firewalling, what do you use and why?
>> 1) ipfwadm
>> 2) ipchains
>> 3) iptables
> I assume you ask me specifically.


  No, I'm asking you generically. 


> In most hypotheticals I care to
> imagine, I would use iptables, because I believe I know it well enough
> to make it do what I would want it to do.


  Can't you come up with any technical reason as to why *all*
firewalling today in Linux is done with iptables (a little with
nftables) and none with ipchains and ipfwadm anymore?


> Of course, if it'd be for a
> Mac powerbook, I would have to sob for at least a week, and then use pf,
> probably.


  Irrelevant remark.  That's not Linux.


> You have a favourite, too?


  I favour technically updated, advanced, modern, maintained, versatile,
powerful and easy to use tools.  In this case, it's iptables.  And ip
and iw for the same reasons, like all distro maintainers and almost all
Linux networking developers do.



-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com):

> You accused me of intentions I never had, and are still failing at
> providing with technical reasons why obsolete, nearly unmaintained,
> universally deprecated and way outdated commands are to still be used
> today when they do not offer any advantage over the current,
> maintained, universally available and much more versatile and powerful
> and still easy to use commands that have been available for decades.

Allesandro, my friend, over many years on the Internet, I've found that
certain discussions are best concluded with amicable production of the
set of facts that all present (within reason; and my other friend Ralph
Ronnquist easily qualifies) can agree upon, and then amicably agreeing
to disagree on the rest.

I'd suggest this is one of those.

-- 
Cheers,You must rise or sink / You must conquer or win, 
Rick Moen  Or serve and lose. / Suffer or triumph, / Be anvil or hammer.
r...@linuxmafia.com 
McQ! (4x80)-- Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Gesellige Lieder, Ein Anderes 
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Ralph Ronnquist via Dng
So you ask a question just so you can spit on me?

Really, boy, you should have a chat with your shrink.

Ralph.
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Alessandro Selli
On 08/03/19 at 01:19, Rick Moen wrote:
> Quoting Alessandro Selli (alessandrose...@linux.com):
>
> Allesandro, my friend, over many years on the Internet, I've found that
> certain discussions are best concluded with amicable production of the
> set of facts that all present (within reason; and my other friend Ralph
> Ronnquist easily qualifies) can agree upon, and then amicably agreeing
> to disagree on the rest.
>
> I'd suggest this is one of those.

👍


-- 
Alessandro Selli 
VOIP SIP: dhatarat...@ekiga.net
Chiave firma e cifratura PGP/GPG signing and encoding key:
  BA651E4050DDFC31E17384BABCE7BD1A1B0DF2AE




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Ralph Ronnquist via Dng (dng@lists.dyne.org):

> It's intriguing to see you get so emotional about this.

I obviously would not presume to speak for Allesandro, but sometimes
people get frustrated in Internet arguments in ways they might not in
more-interactive discussion.  (Anyway, I'd always rather make charitable
assumptions about people.  Well, not always, as achieving a saing a
saintly disposition is still a work in process.  But one tries.)

> Just the other week I opted for using ifconfig because I couldn't work
> out the single command for confguring a tap with an IP address, and
> bring it up. With ip, I seemed to need 3 commands, so at that time I
> liked ifconfig better. I

I completely know how that is, starting with familiarity and then
continuing with efficiency (or apparent efficiency).  I may more may not
ever get as comfortable with 'ss' as I am with netstat, for example, and
'netstat -nalp' is hard-wired into my memory, whereas I have to look up
the 'ss' equivalent, every time.

This iproute2 user guide might help, as it has for me:
https://www.baturin.org/docs/iproute2/#Tun%20and%20Tap%20devices

-- 
Cheers,"I never quarrel with a man who buys ink by the barrel."
Rick Moen-- Rep. Charles B. Brownson (R-Indiana), ca. 1960
r...@linuxmafia.com
McQ! (4x80)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Hendrik Boom
On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 02:31:06PM +0100, KatolaZ wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 08:13:01AM -0500, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> 
> [cut]
> 
> > 
> > Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary 
> > user on a laptop?  Except maybe a few quirks like the one we're now 
> > debugging?  If so I'll upgrade soon and look for problems.  I'd prefer not 
> > to have to downgrade or reinstall if my system becomes unusable.
> >
> 
> Define "ordinary user on a laptop". I have been using beowulf since
> about 8 months ago on my laptop, and haven't experience any major
> breakage (but I should probably also definne "major breakage"
> here). My impression is that beowulf is pretty usable, but I am not
> running a DE so my experience does not cover session-related automagic
> goodies.

That's good enough for me.  Thanks.

> 
> It would be great if more people would actually move on beowulf as
> soon as possible, so that we can identify as many glitches as possible
> and put together a beta of beowulf.

I plan to upgrade this weekend.

-- hendrik
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] Request for testing of slim/experimental

2019-03-07 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Hendrik Boom (hend...@topoi.pooq.com):

> Is beowulf already in a state where it is generally useable for an ordinary 
> user on a laptop?

Simple solution:  Define yourself to be extraordinary.  ;->

-- 
Cheers, I could maybe do one pilate.
Rick Moen   -- Matt Watson (@biorhythmist)
r...@linuxmafia.com
McQ! (4x80)
___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng


Re: [DNG] simple-netaid-backend debugged.

2019-03-07 Thread terryc
On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 22:05:39 +0100
Alessandro Selli  wrote:

> On 07/03/19 at 21:22, Ralph Ronnquist via Dng wrote:
> > Alessandro Selli wrote on 8/3/19 6:49 am:  
> >>   Next improvement would be using current commands (ip and iw) in
> >> place of the obsolete and deprecated ones, i.e. ifconfig and
> >> iwconfig:  
> > The terms "obsolete" and "deprecated" are badly chosen, since the
> > programs ifconfig and iwconfig are neither.  
> 
> 
>   Yes, they are.  They are pending removal from several (all?) major
> distributions, some already removed them years ago,

Should I not mention systemd. I'm sure it is a drop in replacement in
that sentence above.

> 
> You are of course free to ignore facts.  We do live in a free society.

Shrug, no such thing as facts. Just common majority accepted
explanations for "reality'.


___
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng