Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] RFX 900 200mW

2008-07-30 Thread Vincenzo
Fantastic.. I just had not realized this.. (i did not know about the
filter at first) and I wanted to be sure about that.. 

It actually sounded too good to be true.. because I'm already getting a
usable signal (10 m distance indoors) with the filter.. therefore I
expect really good performance without it..

Many thanks Matt..

PS. 
will the 50 MHz - 1 GHz transceiver be ready for the end of the summer..
I'm looking forward to have one.. :)


On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 21:10 -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
> Vincenzo wrote:
> > Thanks Matt!
> > really precious answer..
> > actually, transmitting an 8 MHz wide signal at 820MHz without bypassing
> > the ISM filter.. what kind of attenuation should I expect? ..I mean..
> > just a rough estimate of its magnitude..
> >   
> 
> 
> What I meant was that if you are working WITHIN the ISM band (902-928 
> MHz) you could get a couple extra dB by bypassing the filter.  If you 
> are outside of the band, you MUST bypass it.  You could be getting as 
> much as 30 dB off attenuation there.
> 
> Matt



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


[Discuss-gnuradio] compare data from usrp_siggen.py and usrp_oscope.py

2008-07-30 Thread James Park
Hi,

I compared the data from usrp_siggen.py and usrp_oscope.py using matlab,
but wave from usrp_oscope.py data has twice longer wavelength.
Could you tell me why this happaned? do I have to change the parameters?
Also, I added the

self.connect(self.txpath, gr.file_sink (gr.sizeof_gr_complex, "data.dat"))

in the benchmark_ofdm_tx.py to get data.
However, there are huge amplitude difference between the wave from
usrp_oscope.py data and the wave from benchmark_ofdm_tx.py data.
I used the function http://gnuradio.org/trac/wiki/Octave
Could you give me some idea?
Thank you.

James,
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Re: Basic RX. - usrp_wfm_rcv.py

2008-07-30 Thread rita pfc
OK Patrick I'll take into account next time. At the end I could solve my
problems. Now I'm trying to transmit with the Basic TX
Thanks .
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] modelsim help using megacells

2008-07-30 Thread George Nychis



George Nychis wrote:



George Nychis wrote:

Hi all,

I am having trouble running a testbench in ModelSim which uses 
megacells.  I added megacells such as fifo_4kx16_dc.v and 
fifo_1kx16.v, but when trying to simulate I get errors such as:


Error: (vsim-3033) 
Z:/gnychis/fpga/usrp/fpga/megacells/fifo_4kx16_dc.v(89): Instantiation 
of 'dcfifo' failed. The design unit was not found.


I can find dcfifo in the altera_mf library, and it builds just fine. 
I'm not sure how linking goes in ModelSim?  I added altera_mf to my 
search and still get an error:


# ** Error: (vsim-3033) 
Z:/gnychis/fpga/usrp/fpga/megacells/fifo_4kx16_dc.v(89): Instantiation 
of 'dcfifo' failed. The design unit was not found.

# Region: /tb_timestamps/rx_buffer/rx_usb_fifo
# Searched libraries:
# C:/altera/72sp2/quartus/eda/sim_lib/altera_mf
# work

I'd greatly appreciate any help.



I think I survived with: vsim -L altera_mf work.tb_timestamps



Took a little bit more work first though, thanks to Brian:

cd c:/altera/72sp2/quartus/eda/sim_lib
vlib lpm
vlib altera_mf
vlib altera_primitives
vlog -work lpm 220model.v
vlog -work altera_primitives altera_primitives.v

then finally,
vsim -L altera_mf work.tb_timestamps

- George



___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio


[Discuss-gnuradio] parameters of benchmark_ofdm_tx.py?

2008-07-30 Thread James Park
Hi,

are there any parameter that I can modify benchmark_ofdm_tx.py for number of
subchannels, or amplitude of each subchannels?
Also, I want to save the data with benchmark_ofdm_tx.py and
benchmark_ofdm_rx.py adding

self.connect(self.txpath, gr.file_sink (gr.sizeof_gr_complex, "data.dat"))

 self.connect(self.rxpath, gr.file_sink (gr.sizeof_gr_complex, "data.dat"))

does it make sense?
I don't know why but I have error in ofdm_rx.py.
Thank you for your help.

James,
___
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio