Fantastic.. I just had not realized this.. (i did not know about the
filter at first) and I wanted to be sure about that.. 

It actually sounded too good to be true.. because I'm already getting a
usable signal (10 m distance indoors) with the filter.. therefore I
expect really good performance without it..

Many thanks Matt..

PS. 
will the 50 MHz - 1 GHz transceiver be ready for the end of the summer..
I'm looking forward to have one.. :)


On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 21:10 -0700, Matt Ettus wrote:
> Vincenzo wrote:
> > Thanks Matt!
> > really precious answer..
> > actually, transmitting an 8 MHz wide signal at 820MHz without bypassing
> > the ISM filter.. what kind of attenuation should I expect? ..I mean..
> > just a rough estimate of its magnitude..
> >   
> 
> 
> What I meant was that if you are working WITHIN the ISM band (902-928 
> MHz) you could get a couple extra dB by bypassing the filter.  If you 
> are outside of the band, you MUST bypass it.  You could be getting as 
> much as 30 dB off attenuation there.
> 
> Matt



_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to