Fantastic.. I just had not realized this.. (i did not know about the filter at first) and I wanted to be sure about that..
It actually sounded too good to be true.. because I'm already getting a usable signal (10 m distance indoors) with the filter.. therefore I expect really good performance without it.. Many thanks Matt.. PS. will the 50 MHz - 1 GHz transceiver be ready for the end of the summer.. I'm looking forward to have one.. :) On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 21:10 -0700, Matt Ettus wrote: > Vincenzo wrote: > > Thanks Matt! > > really precious answer.. > > actually, transmitting an 8 MHz wide signal at 820MHz without bypassing > > the ISM filter.. what kind of attenuation should I expect? ..I mean.. > > just a rough estimate of its magnitude.. > > > > > What I meant was that if you are working WITHIN the ISM band (902-928 > MHz) you could get a couple extra dB by bypassing the filter. If you > are outside of the band, you MUST bypass it. You could be getting as > much as 30 dB off attenuation there. > > Matt _______________________________________________ Discuss-gnuradio mailing list Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
