Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo
Hi, This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo. I am trying to contact him as the owner of golang-github-masterminds-semver[0]. There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 weeks ago[1]. Does anyone know how to contact eclipseo? Thanks, fuller [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2178685 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166945 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo
Thanks for the suggestion, but I do not use Twitter and don't want to create an account. On March 15, 2023 5:13:43 PM GMT+02:00, Fabio Valentini wrote: >On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 4:04 PM Mark E. Fuller >wrote: >> >> Hi, >> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for eclipseo. >> I am trying to contact him as the owner of >> golang-github-masterminds-semver[0]. >> There is one other open non-responsive maintainer check, filed ~2 weeks >> ago[1]. >> Does anyone know how to contact eclipseo? > >I haven't had luck with getting responses to bugs or emails either ... >Maybe reaching out on twitter could work? https://twitter.com/eclipseo10 > >Fabio >___ >devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >Fedora Code of Conduct: >https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >List Archives: >https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >Do not reply to spam, report it: >https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Stuck package - golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter
I'll try to push this along - there's a build error that needs resolving (but not at 2:30 AM) see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2112130 Anyone from the golang list want to take a look? -fuller On 02/05/2023 19:25, Pat Riehecky wrote: golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter seems to be unmaintained at this point. There are a few open CVEs that have been corrected upstream in the last year but not made it down to the fedora package. In Feb I opened a maintainer check ticket : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2166945 Alas, I'm not able to maintain this package myself. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_0xD599E76CFFCABF60.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Error building new package in sidetag
Hi all, I am adding a few new dependencies to update a golang package (nothing new here) and building the new packages and update in a sidetag for F40. However, for one of the new dependencies, there is a repeated error: "FAILED: BuildError: package golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter not in list for tag f40-build-side-92523" Does this mean that this (new) package simply hasn't populated yet in the F40 list used by koji (i.e. wait it out)? Or is this something aberrant that requires intervention to fix? It's only been a few hours since I imported the new dependencies and built everything in rawhide. Thanks, fuller-- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
non-responsive maintainer check for anthr76
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964 This email is part of the non-responsive maintainer procedure for anthr76, following https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/. Please respond if you are still active in Fedora and want to maintain golang-github-google-renameio-2. Please see the request for unretirement at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219084 OpenPGP_0xD599E76CFFCABF60.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Assistance unretiring branches of package
Hi all, In order to update go-task, I need to unretire branches for F39 and Rawhide of https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-google-renameio-2 (and then update the package) It's not clear to me how to proceed since the package is not orphaned (and the maintainer did not respond to a bug report) Thanks, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Go-SIG: One re-review and one update needed
Dear Go-list (and broader Fedora dev list), I've been dragging on getting an update to go-task done - I need to request a (re)review of golang-github-google-renameio-2 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2231733) as a dependency of golang-mvdan-sh-3 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084291) which needs updating to build the latest go-task. Obviously I'm willing to swap my own time and effort against getting these tasks completed. Regards, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
process to unretire/re-review package where some branches still exist?
Hi all, I'm trying to unretire golang-github-google-renameio-2 and have completed a re-review. However, since the package still exists in F37 and F38, the process for getting the F39 and rawhide branches "back" and getting control of the package repo is unclear. Can anyone advise? Thanks, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Review-swap: trivial golang package to update nats stack
I'd like to offer to swap reviews to get golang-github-nats-io-jwt-2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2237326 into Rawhide We already have v1 and attempting to update that package in order to upgrade the nats stack led to some breakage and headaches a few months ago Thanks all, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
orphaning prometheus* and some other golang packages
Hi all, I picked up a number of prometheus packages (see below) a few months back during the golang scramble after an unresponsive maintainer. I don't have the time or the interest (or the technical chops) to maintain them. Obviously these are important packages, so at this time I am announcing my intention to orphan them. Unless I hear from someone who would like to actively collaborate on their maintenance, I'm going to orphan them in approximately one week: golang-github-prometheus golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter golang-github-prometheus-exporter-toolkit golang-github-prometheus-community-runit golang-opentelemetry-otel golang-google-grpc Best, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Strange(?) build failures for golang package
I am trying to update go-task for some time now and consistently getting a build error/failure with no clear indication of what's happened: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06508072-golang-github-task/builder-live.log.gz Is it possible that there are build flags are default settings in the golang macros that might be leading to this? Thanks, fuller ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 Hi all, I am having consistent issues on F39 and Rawhide with locally using mockbuild: ``` Start(bootstrap): init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish(bootstrap): init plugins Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins INFO: Signal handler active Start: run INFO: Start(...) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) Start: clean chroot Finish: clean chroot Mock Version: 5.3 INFO: Mock Version: 5.3 Start(bootstrap): chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled package manager cache Start(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata Finish(bootstrap): cleaning package manager metadata INFO: Using 'dnf' instead of 'dnf5' for bootstrap chroot INFO: Package manager dnf detected and used (fallback) Finish(bootstrap): chroot init Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: root cache aged out! cache will be rebuilt INFO: enabled package manager cache Start: cleaning package manager metadata Finish: cleaning package manager metadata INFO: enabled HW Info plugin INFO: Package manager dnf5 detected and used (direct choice) INFO: Buildroot is handled by package management downloaded with a bootstrap image: rpm-4.18.0-0.alpha1.6.fc37.x86_64 python3-dnf-4.11.1-3.fc37.noarch python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.1.0-1.fc37.noarch Start: installing minimal buildroot with dnf5 execv(/usr/bin/dnf5) failed: No such file or directory ``` Do I need to get new config files from somewhere? Should this fix itself shortly? Thank you -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5
Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to do the trick - the `mock --scrub=all` runs, but then the same error keeps occurring on both systems Any other thoughts as to how to more aggressively/manually force an update? Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 12/28/23 14:32, Jonathan Steffan wrote: Mark, You likely just need to scrub mock to clean out the dnf4 based bootstrap. A fresh one with dnf5 will be automatically downloaded. mock --scrub=all -- Jonathan Steffan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: mockbuild fails locally: dnf v dnf5
ok, so perhaps I needed to use `sudo` previously - I ended up manually wiping the `/var/lib/mock/ directory contents and that fixed me up Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 12/31/23 12:43, Mark E. Fuller wrote: Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to do the trick - the `mock --scrub=all` runs, but then the same error keeps occurring on both systems Any other thoughts as to how to more aggressively/manually force an update? Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 12/28/23 14:32, Jonathan Steffan wrote: Mark, You likely just need to scrub mock to clean out the dnf4 based bootstrap. A fresh one with dnf5 will be automatically downloaded. mock --scrub=all -- Jonathan Steffan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
EPEL: packaging multiple versions and compat packages
Hi all, Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the same package to be available? Is this allowed for EPEL? Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Review Swaps
Hi all, I have two packages for which I'd like to offer to swap reviews: 1) Bug 2135036 - Review Request: golang-github-sajari-fuzzy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2135036 This is a new dependency blocking an update to one of my existing (Go) packages. Autogenerated spec, should be a trivial review. 2) Bug 2126785 - Review Request: usbrelay https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126785 USB-connected electrical relay control, based on hidapi Thank you -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://mefuller.dev PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Help with go spec file
Hi all,
I'm fairly new to go and am looking to make a spec file and build
jsonnet (https://github.com/google/go-jsonnet/, https://jsonnet.org/).
The go2rpm utility has proven very helpful, but there appear to be two
irregularities with building this package that I don't know offhand how
to address (including from reading
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Golang/).
1) What is the preferred way to ignore (or remove) unnecessary
BUILD.bazel files? There is one in cmd/ which is obviously not a
buildable command, and so this results in an error in the naive use case.
2) How should nested folders in cmd/ be built? Here, again, the basic
template throws an error since cmd/internal contains no *.go files, only
a BUILD.bezel file and a nested cmd directory.
Thank you all,
fuller
--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60# Generated by go2rpm 1.6.0
%bcond_without check
# https://github.com/google/go-jsonnet
%global goipath github.com/google/go-jsonnet
Version:0.18.0
%gometa
%global common_description %{expand:
This an implementation of Jsonnet in pure Go.
It is a feature complete, production-ready implementation.
It is compatible with the original Jsonnet C++ implementation.
Bindings to C and Python are available (but not battle-tested yet).}
%global golicenses LICENSE
%global godocs README.md linter/README.md
Name: %{goname}
Release:%autorelease
Summary:None
# Upstream license specification: Apache-2.0
License:ASL 2.0
URL:%{gourl}
Source0:%{gosource}
%description
%{common_description}
%gopkg
%prep
%goprep
%generate_buildrequires
%go_generate_buildrequires
%build
for cmd in cmd/* ; do
%gobuild -o %{gobuilddir}/bin/$(basename $cmd) %{goipath}/$cmd
done
for cmd in c-bindings; do
%gobuild -o %{gobuilddir}/bin/$(basename $cmd) %{goipath}/$cmd
done
%install
%gopkginstall
install -m 0755 -vd %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
install -m 0755 -vp %{gobuilddir}/bin/* %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/
%if %{with check}
%check
%gocheck
%endif
%files
%license LICENSE
%doc README.md linter/README.md
%{_bindir}/*
%gopkgfiles
%changelog
%autochangelog
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Review swaps
Dear all, I'm looking to package task (https://taskfile.dev/) for Fedora and would like to offer to swap reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078117 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078118 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2093467 All three spec files were generated automatically and the reviews should be trivial (at least I hope so). Thanks all, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Request: Airspy HF+
This package has actually already been approved for Fedora in March of 2021: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917510 The repository is at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/airspyhf-1.6.8-1 It looks like Emiliano (the packager, on CC) never actually imported and built the approved package. Emiliano: do you need/want assistance in getting this actually built and in the repositories? Devel List: If no response from Emiliano, what's the process here for taking over a package in this case (and also renaming the repo to drop the version from it)? "Buford": I built it in COPR for now and you are welcome to grab it from there and test it: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fuller/test-builds/ Run the following command: sudo dnf copr enable fuller/test-builds && sudo dnf install airspyhf On 18/06/2022 11:29, Buford T. Justice wrote: I hope Fedora does. openSUSE has a bunch so far: https://software.opensuse.org/search?baseproject=ALL&q=airspy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 OpenPGP_0xD599E76CFFCABF60.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
go version unknown?
Hi all, I have two Fedora machines that are essentially identically configured (to the best of my knowledge) - a daily use desktop and a laptop for lugging around. Anyway, somehow the laptop is properly returning `go version` and properly running a go debugger, etc. is VS Codium, but this is not working on the desktop and I am instead getting `go version unknown linux/amd64` instead of a proper version. I've tried reinstalling and and also completely removing and reinstalling `golang`, but it's still the same. Any suggestions as to how to troubleshoot this? Thanks, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
go version unknown?
Hi all, I have two Fedora machines that are essentially identically configured (to the best of my knowledge) - a daily use desktop and a laptop for lugging around. Anyway, somehow the laptop is properly returning `go version` and properly running a go debugger, etc. is VS Codium, but this is not working on the desktop and I am instead getting `go version unknown linux/amd64` instead of a proper version. I've tried reinstalling and and also completely removing and reinstalling `golang`, but it's still the same. Any suggestions as to how to troubleshoot this? Thanks, fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: go version unknown?
Thanks - that fixed it Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 19/06/2022 0:52, Martin Jackson wrote: On Sun, 2022-06-19 at 00:02 +0300, Mark E. Fuller wrote: Hi all, I have two Fedora machines that are essentially identically configured (to the best of my knowledge) - a daily use desktop and a laptop for lugging around. Anyway, somehow the laptop is properly returning `go version` and properly running a go debugger, etc. is VS Codium, but this is not working on the desktop and I am instead getting `go version unknown linux/amd64` instead of a proper version. I've tried reinstalling and and also completely removing and reinstalling `golang`, but it's still the same. Any suggestions as to how to troubleshoot this? Check to see if you have gcc-go installed, which also provides a golang compiler (/usr/bin/go) but not equivalent to the regular golang toolset (golang-bin etc). vim-sytastic-go used to depend on that, I changed that in 34 or 35 (since I had a similar problem). Thanks, Marty ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Packages that failed to build with Python 3.11 (and what to do)
On 20/06/2022 14:45, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
>
> ## Where to get help
>
> Reply to this thread or find us (thrnciar, mhroncok) on
#fedora-python IRC channel (libera.chat)or Matrix
(#python:fedoraproject.org <http://fedoraproject.org>).
>
> ---
>
> Let us know if you have other questions.
>
Question: my error appears to be in a Python header.
Can someone take a look at this and giver me some quick feedback as to
whether this is a problem for my package or a bug I should report?
It doesn't seem to fall into one of the neat categories described by Tomas
```
/usr/bin/python3 -c "import Cython.Build;
Cython.Build.cythonize('build/python/cantera/_cantera.pyx')"
Compiling build/python/cantera/_cantera.pyx because it changed.
[1/1] Cythonizing build/python/cantera/_cantera.pyx
g++ -o build/temp-py/_cantera.os -c -std=c++11 -pthread -O3 -Wno-inline
-g -fPIC -DNDEBUG -Iinclude -I/usr/include/python3.11
-I/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/numpy/core/include
-I/usr/include/eigen3 build/python/cantera/_cantera.cpp
In file included from
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/ndarraytypes.h:1960,
from
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/ndarrayobject.h:12,
from
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/arrayobject.h:5,
from build/python/cantera/_cantera.cpp:749:
/usr/lib64/python3.11/site-packages/numpy/core/include/numpy/npy_1_7_deprecated_api.h:17:2:
warning: #warning "Using deprecated NumPy API, disable it with "
"#define NPY_NO_DEPRECATED_API NPY_1_7_API_VERSION" [-Wcpp]
17 | #warning "Using deprecated NumPy API, disable it with " \
| ^~~
In file included from /usr/include/python3.11/Python.h:38,
from build/python/cantera/_cantera.cpp:20:
/usr/include/python3.11/pyport.h: In instantiation of 'type
{anonymous}::_Py_CAST_impl(const expr_type&) [with type = _object*;
expr_type = int]':
build/python/cantera/_cantera.cpp:193144:9: required from here
/usr/include/python3.11/pyport.h:47:24: error: invalid 'static_cast'
from type 'int' to type '_object*'
47 | return static_cast(const_cast&>(expr));
| ^~~~
scons: *** [build/temp-py/_cantera.os] Error 1
scons: building terminated because of errors.
```
See: https://github.com/Cantera/cantera/issues/1325
Also: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/2453/88502453/build.log
Best,
-fuller
--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
HaShikma 19, Apt. 24
Nesher 3681219, Israel
+972 (0)53-872-6579
+49 (0)1577 1848188
+1 401-214-4266
mark.e.ful...@gmail.com
mark.e.ful...@gmx.de
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Permission errors with fedora-review and mock
Up to a couple days ago, mock and fedora-review were working fine for me, but just recently I have started getting permission errors: ``` ... Building target platforms: x86_64 Building for target x86_64 setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1656028800 RPM build errors: error: error creating temporary file /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4XaamA: Permission denied error: Unable to open temp file: Permission denied error creating temporary file /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4XaamA: Permission denied Unable to open temp file: Permission denied Child return code was: 1 Mock Version: 3.0 ``` Any suggestions for how to fix this? I verified that I am in the mock group -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@member.fsf.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Request: Airspy HF+
Sorry it's not working. I simply build the existing approved package that was otherwise abandoned. Given what you installed with Mandriva, it looks like there's another package needed - airspyone_host, which is in the Fedora repositories. (see e.g. https://pkgs.org/search/?q=airspyone_host) Have you tried installing that package as well? Please also keep in mind that Fedora is a volunteer-driven, community project. We all have limited time to contribute and while I and many others are willing to assist with software like yours, it would be nicer to see a request for assistance with getting the software into the distribution over a lament that we do not have it. Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 10/07/2022 12:25, Buford T. Justice wrote: @Mark E. Fuller Something isn't right with your airspyhf software. I installed it, but neither Gqrx nor SDR++ sees the Airspy HF+ Discovery. Also, I cannot do "airspyhf_info" to see its status. All I get is: [BT@PC ~]$ airspyhf_info AirSpy HF library version: 1.6.8 No devices attached. I was messing with OpenMandriva the other day. "sudo dnf install airspyone_host airspyhf" works and installed both devices. I really wish Fedora would do this. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Non-responsive maintainer-like policy for approved packages that aren't imported?
Can anyone advise as to what the policy should be when a package is reviewed and approved but never imported? This is the second one of these I have come across recently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2031922 was approved ~5 months ago and has gone nowhere since and it is now blocking a current review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2074467) Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@mefuller.dev @fuller:fedora.im @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)
Am Montag, dem 14.12.2020 um 11:12 -0500 schrieb Neal Gompa: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 10:30 AM Christopher < > ctubb...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > > > Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons, > > surely people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master" > > for our dist-git branch names for our RPMs, simply because it > > follows our naming conventions and makes things easier from that > > perspective. The only reason they were ever named "master" in the > > first place is because it was git's default name. Nobody chose it > > to be "master" for Fedora... we just accepted the tyranny of the > > default. We should have always had it named "rawhide". I'm not in > > favor of changing it to "main", because if we're interested in > > changing it, we should take the opportunity to use a better name... > > one that is meaningful to us... rather than just accept a new > > default naming convention that doesn't mean anything to us. > > "rawhide" has a special meaning in Fedora, but "main" doesn't. > > Let's use "rawhide". > > > > +1 > I also strongly favor this solution and logic > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. Robensstraße 57 52070 Aachen +49 (0)1577-1848188 +1 401-366-2771 mark.e.ful...@gmail.com mark.e.ful...@gmx.de @mefuller:matrix.org https://mefuller.github.io/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
eclipse-photran builds failed/not included since F32
I'm not quite sure where else to direct this - I intermittently do some Fortran work and the Eclipse plugin (eclipse-photran) appears to have disappeared from the repos since F32. Looking at Koji, releng was previously doing the builds for it . Does anyone know anymore about this including whether eclipse-photran is being (intentionally) dropped and alternatives? Thanks all -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. Robensstraße 57 52070 Aachen +49 (0)1577-1848188 +1 401-366-2771 mark.e.ful...@gmail.com mark.e.ful...@gmx.de @mefuller:matrix.org https://mefuller.github.io/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: eclipse-photran builds failed/not included since F32
Am Samstag, dem 26.12.2020 um 22:10 +0100 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski: > On Wednesday, 23 December 2020 at 02:13, Mark E. Fuller wrote: > > I'm not quite sure where else to direct this - I intermittently do > > some > > Fortran work and the Eclipse plugin (eclipse-photran) appears to > > have > > disappeared from the repos since F32. Looking at Koji, releng was > > previously doing the builds for it . Does anyone know anymore about > > this including whether eclipse-photran is being (intentionally) > > dropped > > and alternatives? > > It was retired 7 months ago after being orphaned[1]. To bring it > back, > you'd have to become the new maintainer, submit a new review request > and > ask for unretirement. Thank you very much. For the next question, since I have never built or maintained packages before, can someone point me to a "dummies" guide if such a thing exists? I would be happy to try to take over the package and learn something along the way. > > Regards, > Dominik > > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/eclipse-photran > > -- > Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org > There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and > oppression to develop psychic muscles. > -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess > Irulan > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. Robensstraße 57 52070 Aachen +49 (0)1577-1848188 +1 401-366-2771 mark.e.ful...@gmail.com mark.e.ful...@gmx.de @mefuller:matrix.org https://mefuller.github.io/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package Review / Sponsorship Request
Good day all, I have just submitted a review request (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037645) for Cantera, a chemical kinetics, thermodynamics, and transport tool suite (https://cantera.org/, https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fuller/Cantera/). As this is my first package, I appreciate any constructive feedback and am looking for a sponsor. I am particularly interested in having the package ultimately available in EPEL as this would make installation on many HPC resources very simple. Regards, Fuller -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Request assistance getting a package (usbrelay) into Fedora
I used this software some years ago during my PhD, although ultimately didn't go very far with it (decided against writing my own automation system and outsourced it to an undergrad with LabVIEW...). I would be happy to take a look (especially if I can find that little USB relay again I was having so much fun playing with). Best, Fuller Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 17/01/2022 12:43, Darryl Bond wrote: Hello, I maintain a small application hosted on GitHub. (https://github.com/darrylb123/usbrelay) It allows control of USB connected electrical relays. Originally it was a simple command line application. Over the years, it has accumulated additional features such as a python interface, and an mqtt daemon. There is a debian package that has not been maintained for many years. We are endeavouring to fix that. As a long term Fedora user, I would love to get it into Fedora. However I have never attempted to create an rpm package. The more I read, the more confused I am. Questions on Issues like: - How to clone the GitHub repository in the spec file - should there be one package or a separate python package. - what about the daemon/ systemd service... Any help greatly appreciated Darryl ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure OpenPGP_0xD599E76CFFCABF60.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Request assistance getting a package (usbrelay) into Fedora
Hi Darryl, My emails keep bouncing when I try to write to you directly. I'll try to block off some time in the coming week to take a stab at drafting a package for usbrelay and then get back to you. Looking forward to working with you. In the meantime, please send me a message directly so we can move off the list. Best, fuller Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 On 18/01/2022 5:04, Darryl Bond wrote: Mark, Petr's suggestion I find a co maintainer sounds very sensible. It's unlikely I'll need to do any other package. I would be pleased to assist you if you chose to be that person. Darryl ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure OpenPGP_0xD599E76CFFCABF60.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: ppc64le build failures in the mass rebuild
My spec for cantera currently has an "excludearch" for ppc64le since the rawhide builds were failing - should I drop this allow for the releng tools to automatically find and rebuild it? Thanks 31 Jan 2022 16:47:07 Sérgio Basto : > On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 13:36 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: >> On Mon, 31 Jan 2022 12:04:08 + >> Sérgio Basto wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 2022-01-31 at 11:12 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: Hi, as there are still a number of ppc64le build failures from the mass rebuild, please make the FTBFS bugs block the "PPCTracker" so we know about them. Here is what we know so far - segfaulting ICE with "during RTL pass: final" or not being able to assemble the sources, those should be fixed in gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36, so a rebuild should fix them >>> >>> In resume, I think all failed builds , should be resubmitted again. >> >> it already happened in the 2nd run of the mass rebuild, I am mentioning >> it here mainly for completeness and in case someone will still hit it. >> > > yes I'm talking about a 3rd run , since is just resubmit the builds > that still failing , in https://pagure.io/releng we have the script > find_failures.py that can do that job ... > > >> >> Dan >> >>> >>> - issues with "__LDBL_REDIR1_DECL", they are caused by the bundled gnulib not being compatible with the installed glibc, a fix is to replace the bundled cdefs.h with more recent one ( https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=lib/cdefs.h;h=44d3826bca9f6f84f862acf1035408a587fac71d;hb=HEAD ), seen eg in lftp (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045780) or dhcpd-pools (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045310) - various "long double" related issues, some might be fixed by building in proper order, but some will need further investigation, a corner case in libffi should be fixed in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libffi/pull-request/6 - various "vector" related issues/ICE, for example in cantera or mame - libtool de-duplicating internal libs, when it shouldn't, like /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/ppc64le-redhat- linux/12/libgcc.a(float128- ifunc.o): (.data+0x0): undefined reference to `__parse_hwcap_and_convert_at_platform', this is a generic problem, a fix is proposed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2047389 and workaround is https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/codeblocks/c/c8f36775a26f79d598e886a82460d1453871af20?branch=rawhide - something else? Thanks, Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >>> >>> -- >>> Sérgio M. B. >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > > -- > Sérgio M. B. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure signature.asc Description: PGP signature __
Another self-introduction
Hello all and happy (civil) new year. I'm Fuller and I am new to this list since making the switch from stable Fedora to Rawhide about a month ago. I have been Linux-exclusive for nearly 15 years after some first exposure to Debian in the computing labs and made the switch from Ubuntu to Fedora 16 (Verne) back in 2011. I am a research scientist/engineer working on combustion, energy, propulsion, etc. and contribute to some open-source software and databases as part of that work. I am currently on the German translators team for Fedora and hope to also find some ways to give back as my own programming improves with my research. Regards -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. Robensstraße 57 52070 Aachen +49 (0)1577-1848188 +1 401-366-2771 mark.e.ful...@gmail.com mark.e.ful...@gmx.de @mefuller:matrix.org https://mefuller.github.io/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F35 to F36
I have the following errors: Error: Problem 1: package avogadro-libs-1.2.0-35.fc35.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.2.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libGLEW-2.1.0-10.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package avogadro-libs-1.2.0-35.fc35.x86_64 Problem 2: package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedcrypto.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedtls.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package julia-1.7.0.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libmbedx509.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 - mbedtls-2.16.12-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - julia-1.7.2-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On 14/03/2022 5:39, Ian Laurie wrote: On 3/12/22 04:43, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > dnf --releasever=36 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f36 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync For me the only error I received was: Error: Problem: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.32_149290_fedora33-1.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Help with packaging golang binary: resolving dependencies
Hi all,
I'm looking to submit a first golang package for review, but I'm running
into some confusion as to whether there's a way to download/import all
the linked source dependencies without having to package all of those
projects, too.
To make this more concrete:
My spec is at
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04306641-golang-github-task/task.spec
There are three other sources on which it depends, none of which are
already packaged for Fedora, so the build log
(https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/test-builds/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04306641-golang-github-task/builder-live.log.gz)
shows:
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/go-task/slim-sprig)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/mattn/go-zglob)'
No matching package to install: 'golang(github.com/radovskyb/watcher)'
Not all dependencies satisfied
Error: Some packages could not be found.
Copr build error: Build failed
I tried also explicitly adding the other repos as sources, but this
didn't seem to fix the problem either, i.e.:
...
Source0:%{gosource}
Source1:https://github.com/go-task/slim-sprig/archive/master.tar.gz
Source2:
https://github.com/radovskyb/watcher/archive/refs/tags/v1.0.7.tar.gz
Source3:https://github.com/mattn/go-zglob/archive/master.tar.gz
...
Any help is very appreciated,
Regards,
--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@stossrohr.net
@fuller:one.ems.host
https://www.stossrohr.net
PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file
Hi all, I am working on chasing down an issue in preparing a package for review: The package should create a user and group as part of its installation and I have attempted to implement this following the instructions/docs at https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/ Unfortunately, when testing the installation, I always get the following output: ``` Installing : usbrelay-common-1.0-1.fc35.x86_64 1/6 warning: user usbrelay does not exist - using root warning: group usbrelay does not exist - using root warning: user usbrelay does not exist - using root warning: group usbrelay does not exist - using root ``` I've tried several modifications and looked at the munge package for reference, but I'm still stuck. If anyone is willing to take a look, I would be extremely grateful. Test builds: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/fuller/usbrelay/build/4351292/ SPEC:https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/usbrelay/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/04351292-usbrelay/usbrelay.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/fuller/usbrelay/fedora-36-x86_64/04351292-usbrelay/usbrelay-1.0-1.fc36.src.rpm Thanks -- Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. ful...@fedoraproject.org ful...@stossrohr.net @fuller:one.ems.host https://www.stossrohr.net PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file
That did it - thank you very much! On 30/04/2022 23:26, Paweł Marciniak wrote: I think you need %pre -n the same for %preun %post %postun or all systemd macros will not work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Error building new package in sidetag
Yes, it won't build at all for some reason: ➜ golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter git:(f40) fedpkg build --target=f40-build-side-92523 Building golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter-1.0.0-1.fc40 for f40-build-side-92523 Created task: 120489481 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120489481 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 120489481 build (f40-build-side-92523, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free 120489481 build (f40-build-side-92523, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free -> open (buildvm-a64-20.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 120489515 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free 120489515 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free -> open (buildvm-a64-12.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 120489481 build (f40-build-side-92523, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): open (buildvm-a64-20.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: package golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter not in list for tag f40-build-side-92523 0 free 1 open 0 done 1 failed 120489515 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): open (buildvm-a64-12.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed 120489481 build (f40-build-side-92523, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596) failed ➜ golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter git:(f40) fedpkg build Building golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter-1.0.0-1.fc40 for f40-candidate Created task: 120492157 Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=120492157 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 120492157 build (f40-candidate, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free 120492157 build (f40-candidate, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free -> open (buildvm-a64-08.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 120492170 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free 120492170 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): free -> open (buildvm-x86-23.iad2.fedoraproject.org) 120492157 build (f40-candidate, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): open (buildvm-a64-08.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: BuildError: package golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter not in list for tag f40-updates-candidate 0 free 1 open 0 done 1 failed 120492170 buildSRPMFromSCM (/rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596): open (buildvm-x86-23.iad2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed 0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed 120492157 build (f40-candidate, /rpms/golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter.git:1cb570f97400fb06e58b93fee399c6e9400cb596) failed *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 14, 2024 20:53:30 Mikel Olasagasti : > Hi Mark, > > Koji doesn't show as part of that sidetag: > > $ koji list-tagged --latest f40-build-side-92523 > Build Tag Built by > > > golang-github-dominikbraun-graph-0.23.0-1.fc40 f40-build-side-92523 fuller > golang-github-task-template-0-0.1.20240714git960e6f5.fc40 > f40-build-side-92523 fuller > > Doesn't show as built neither for F40: > > $ koji list-builds --package=golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter > Build Built by > State > --- > > golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter-1.0.0-1.fc41 fuller > COMPLETE > > Can you recheck if the build was submitted? > > Regards, > Mikel > > Hau idatzi du Mark E. Fuller (ful...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak > (2024 uzt. 14(a), ig. (20:45)): >> >> Hi all, >> >> I am adding a few new dependencies to update a golang package (nothing new >> here) and building the new packages and update in a sidetag for F40. >> However, for one of the new dependencies, there is a repeated error: >> >> "FAILED: BuildError: package golang-github-ladicle-tabwriter not in list for >> tag f40-build-side-92523" >> >> Does this mean that this (new) package simply hasn't p
Re: Error building new package in sidetag
Thanks, Kevin and Mikel Looks good now *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 14, 2024 22:59:14 Kevin Fenzi : > On Sun, Jul 14, 2024 at 10:02:28PM GMT, Mark E. Fuller via devel wrote: >> Yes, it won't build at all for some reason: > > ...snip... > > The branch wasn't added propperly: > > https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/63631 > > I asked it to retry (note, that anyone can do this, just add another > comment and it should retry). > > It should be good in a few minutes... > > kevin -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Epel8 build with python > 3.6?
I want to make a minor update to an EPEL 8 package, but the default Python is 3.6 where the update requires >=3.7 Is this possible to do (with modules?)? How would I specify it in the spec file if it is? *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?
Thanks, I have tried a few variations on this, but get the following error (trying presently with python 3.8): Error: Problem: conflicting requests - package python38-pytest-4.6.6-3.module+el8.9.0+1418+f0d66789.noarch from powertools is filtered out by modular filtering (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) (In addition to several "sh: /usr/bin/python3.6: No such file or directory" right at the start") Is there an additional switch I need to throw to effectively alias python3 to the proper version? *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 15, 2024 19:48:56 Stephen Smoogen : > On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 06:57, Mark E. Fuller via devel > wrote: >> >> I want to make a minor update to an EPEL 8 package, but the default Python >> is 3.6 where the update requires >=3.7 >> >> Is this possible to do (with modules?)? How would I specify it in the spec >> file if it is? > > BuildRequires: python3.12 > > and equivalent names for other packages. > >> Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. >> ful...@fedoraproject.org >> ful...@mefuller.dev >> @fuller:fedora.im >> @fuller:one.ems.host >> https://mefuller.dev >> PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 >> -- >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Do not reply to spam, report it: >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > > > > -- > Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive > Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard > battle. -- Ian MacClaren -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?
Sorry, left out that using python3.12 works until the version checker in the scons builder returns that I'm using unsupported Python3.6, hence asking whether there needs to be a switch somewhere *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* *ful...@fedoraproject.org* *ful...@mefuller.dev* *@fuller:fedora.im* *@fuller:one.ems.host* *https://mefuller.dev* *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* Jul 16, 2024 08:21:41 Mark E. Fuller via devel : > Thanks, I have tried a few variations on this, but get the following error > (trying presently with python 3.8): > > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - package python38-pytest-4.6.6-3.module+el8.9.0+1418+f0d66789.noarch from > powertools is filtered out by modular filtering > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to > use not only best candidate packages) > > (In addition to several "sh: /usr/bin/python3.6: No such file or directory" > right at the start") > > Is there an additional switch I need to throw to effectively alias python3 to > the proper version? > *Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.* > *ful...@fedoraproject.org* > *ful...@mefuller.dev* > *@fuller:fedora.im* > *@fuller:one.ems.host* > *https://mefuller.dev* > *PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60* > > Jul 15, 2024 19:48:56 Stephen Smoogen : > >> On Mon, 15 Jul 2024 at 06:57, Mark E. Fuller via devel >> wrote: >>> >>> I want to make a minor update to an EPEL 8 package, but the default Python >>> is 3.6 where the update requires >=3.7 >>> >>> Is this possible to do (with modules?)? How would I specify it in the spec >>> file if it is? >> >> BuildRequires: python3.12 >> >> and equivalent names for other packages. >> >>> Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D. >>> ful...@fedoraproject.org >>> ful...@mefuller.dev >>> @fuller:fedora.im >>> @fuller:one.ems.host >>> https://mefuller.dev >>> PGP Fingerprint: 73F1 A30C BDF4 DB4B C75F FD0F D599 E76C FFCA BF60 >>> -- >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Do not reply to spam, report it: >>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue >> >> >> >> -- >> Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive >> Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard >> battle. -- Ian MacClaren > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?
Jul 16, 2024 13:30:00 Petr Pisar : > V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock >> you have to tell it to enable the module there are in. I don’t know the >> syntax off hand but it is probably a command line flag. >> > It's not a modularity issue. The issue is the python38-pytest is only built as > a modular package. In contrast to python38 or python312 packages which are > built a nonmodular packages. > > It's a common misinterpretation of missing packages as "modularity breaks my > system". Reality is that Python team does not build 3rd-party packages, like > pytest, for nondefault Python out of modules. They could, but they don't. > > The error message only means that the only python38-pytest package found is > from python38:3.8 module stream, but that stream is not enabled. That's all. > > If Mark cannot enable the stream for whatever reason, the only option for > him to build pytest against python38 for himslelf. > > -- Petr pytest is a red herring - it doesn't cause issues with python312. My build with python 3.12 fails because the scons build detects python version 3.6, not 3.12. Getting the detected version to >3.6 is my real problem, and it seems independent of updating the BuildRequires values -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?
Jul 16, 2024 17:03:22 Miro Hrončok : > On 16. 07. 24 13:28, Petr Pisar wrote: >> V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): >>> So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from >>> mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock >>> you have to tell it to enable the module there are in. I don’t know the >>> syntax off hand but it is probably a command line flag. >>> >> It's not a modularity issue. The issue is the python38-pytest is only built >> as >> a modular package. In contrast to python38 or python312 packages which are >> built a nonmodular packages. > > That is not entirely correct. > > python38 is a modular package, python38-pytest is a modular package as well. > > python3.12 is not a modular package, python3.12-pytest is also not a modular > package. > > -- > > Anyway, the RHEL 8 Python 3.8 module is out of support, don't build any EPEL > packages with Python 3.8 please. No problem. Without scons and python-ruamel-yaml for python3.12, this isn't going anywhere fast But the magic switch I need appears to be: %global __python3 /usr/bin/python3.12 > > -- > Miro Hrončok > -- > Phone: +420777974800 > Fedora Matrix: mhroncok > > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
