Add Gparted into Live's
Dear Fedora Team, I pray to God. Could Fedora live have CD/DVD/USB Gparted by default? Could add Gparted please? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fwd: Why is not included JFS on Anaconda?
Hello everybody, Just that. Why is not included JFS on Anaconda? It's interesting JFS uses bit CPU usage to access data. I was reading about it. However, I saw that ext4 takes more CPU usage to access data. Could be include JFS into Anaconda to next release? What's your opinion about JFS? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
SSD disk over Fedora 20... ?
Dear devel mailing list, I would like to know more information about SSD in Fedora. How I can manage spaces, partition's disk and more? I read about SSD with TRIM support improvements more lyfe cycle durability between other things. I read too that a bad partition scheme would be dangerously decreases a life time of SSD considerably. I am bit worried. More people that buys a laptop with SSD, or buys SSD to install Fedora on It. Grretings! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Another bug on OpenSSL
Dear mailing list, Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0). Some sources talks about that's bug was discovered a long time ago but does not fixed. However, OpenBSD was created a fork called LibreSSL try to solve this issues. Should Fedora to move LibreSSL (http://www.libressl.org/)? Or still use OpenSSL and wait what's bug could be found today, or tomorrow, or few months to go similar Adobe Flash bugs? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
Hello devel list, I want know... Why Fedora doesn't included TapButton support of touchpad by default? I saw AskFedora and FedoraForum.org, and it happened to me too after install or show live CD to people, a lot users request, or asking about How to setup TapButton. It's ok, you can enable it from GNOME control panel, or touchpad tool, or KDE touchpad configuration, but who have installed only LXDE, XFCE... or another Window Manager...? How do? Search solution on Internet? Greetings! -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop > defaults, AFAIK. Mmm, sorry, I cannot understand very well. Im spanish and my english is limited, I can not take things for granted. Desktop, you mean, desktops PCs, right? -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Álvaro Castillo > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Adam Williamson > > wrote: > >> > >> It's a function of the desktop, and we go with the upstream desktop > >> defaults, AFAIK. > > > > > > Mmm, sorry, I cannot understand very well. Im spanish and my english is > > limited, I can not take things for granted. > > > > Desktop, you mean, desktops PCs, right? > > Meaning Desktop Environments, like GNOME, KDE, XFCE, etc. We use > their default settings. > > -J > > > -- > > Álvaro Castillo > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys > > Linux user #547784 > > > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > -- > http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ > > in your fear, seek only peace > in your fear, seek only love > > -d. bowie > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Ok, but I do not understand why a simple thing is not set by default? bit empathic? a lot users want is enabled by default, others doesn't like it, ok, but a who doesn't like it, not affect on your navigation, can ignore this. -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling > tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the "mouse" utility does this > for me. However, when folks on other DEs, such as XFCE ask me how to do > it, I don't quite have an answer. > > Could someone please outline the correct way of enabling tapping and > other options (for instance horizontal scrolling, two finger > scrolling..) on various DEs ? Even if each DE has a specific way, please > can you post with what it is? I can compile the information on a wiki > page to aid users, with relevant links to upstreams if they want to take > up changing defaults with them. > $ synclient TapButton1=1 is to enable touchpad clic -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Álvaro Castillo wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: > >> I thought so too. I was wondering what the DE agnostic way of enabling >> tapping would be though. I use gnome, and the "mouse" utility does this >> for me. However, when folks on other DEs, such as XFCE ask me how to do >> it, I don't quite have an answer. >> >> Could someone please outline the correct way of enabling tapping and >> other options (for instance horizontal scrolling, two finger >> scrolling..) on various DEs ? Even if each DE has a specific way, please >> can you post with what it is? I can compile the information on a wiki >> page to aid users, with relevant links to upstreams if they want to take >> up changing defaults with them. >> > > $ synclient TapButton1=1 is to enable touchpad clic > > > -- > Álvaro Castillo > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys > Linux user #547784 > Maybe add this on all DE, WM...et LXDE spin by adding these two lines to /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf: Code: Option "TapButton1" "1" Option "RBCornerButton" "3" Could problem solved? -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora multi-arch
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > These were originally for ambassadors only to use at events. > > I have no objection to making them more known, however, I think they > should be tested and produced in the same way other Fedora images are. > > In the f17 cycle they were not tested by QA at all, and sadly, the > multi-install iso is broken. This led to useless media and everything > looking bad. ;( > > so, if we are going to make them, they should get tested, produced and > distributed (including signed checksums) like every other image we > produce. IMHO. > Yes, please, before release these DVDs, check QA control, DVDs are money that wasn't unused by these error. I am an ambassador affected by a little problem. On vmlinuz and syslinux, has got 0. This 0 both do cannot boot. You need edit GRUB kernel lines and remove 0 to work -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
Yest... Need edit files to use something as touchpad :) On Sep 18, 2012 2:11 PM, "mike cloaked" wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, wrote: > > devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 09/18/2012 08:09:33: > > > >> From: Florian Müllner > >> To: Development discussions related to Fedora > >> > >> Date: 09/18/2012 08:10 > >> Subject: Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by > >> default? > >> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Camilo Mesias > >> wrote: > >> > I always enable the feature but it is an ongoing annoyance that it is > >> > disabled at GDM, is there any way to force it to default to on for the > >> > whole system? > >> > >> I have the following in /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/10-local-settings: > >> > >> [org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/mouse] > >> active=true > >> > >> [org/gnome/settings-daemon/peripherals/touchpad] > >> tap-to-click=true > >> > >> You will need to run "dconf update" as root for the change to take > effect. > >> > >> > >> Regards, > >> Florian > >> -- > >> devel mailing list > >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > > > > > Any ideas on the equivalent for KDM? > > > > Why not enable it in xorg itself - from memory you can look for a file > like /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-synaptics.conf (or possibly in > /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf or similar) > > Then ensure that you have a section like: > > Section "InputClass" > Identifier "touchpad catchall" > Driver "synaptics" > MatchIsTouchpad "on" > MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*" > Option "TapButton1" "1" > Option "TapButton2" "2" > Option "TapButton3" "3" > Option "VertEdgeScroll" "on" > EndSection > > When you boot you should have touchpad buttons available even at the > KDM greeter stage for login - (I guess same for GDM though I am a KDE > user only) > > I have been doing this for several years with my laptops > > > -- > mike c > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
If you do not like touchpad. Can disable on your laptop with Fn keys. However who can use it need edit somefiles...add code to uses it So. I never occurs that I pushed my finger accidentaly and moved cursor. Lol On Sep 18, 2012 2:16 PM, "Álvaro Castillo" wrote: > Yest... Need edit files to use something as touchpad :) > On Sep 18, 2012 2:11 PM, "mike cloaked" wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 1:55 PM, wrote: >> > devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote on 09/18/2012 08:09:33: >> > >> >> From: Florian Müllner >> >> To: Development discussions related to Fedora >> >> >> >> Date: 09/18/2012 08:10 >> >> Subject: Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by >> >> default? >> >> Sent by: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Camilo Mesias >> >> wrote: >> >> > I always enable the feature but it is an ongoing annoyance that it is >> >> > disabled at GDM, is there any way to force it to default to on for >> the >> >> > whole system? >> >> >> >> I have the following in /etc/dconf/db/gdm.d/10-local-settings: >> >> >> >> [org/gnome/settings-daemon/plugins/mouse] >> >> active=true >> >> >> >> [org/gnome/settings-daemon/peripherals/touchpad] >> >> tap-to-click=true >> >> >> >> You will need to run "dconf update" as root for the change to take >> effect. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> Florian >> >> -- >> >> devel mailing list >> >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > >> > >> > Any ideas on the equivalent for KDM? >> > >> >> Why not enable it in xorg itself - from memory you can look for a file >> like /etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/10-synaptics.conf (or possibly in >> /usr/share/X11/xorg.conf.d/50-synaptics.conf or similar) >> >> Then ensure that you have a section like: >> >> Section "InputClass" >> Identifier "touchpad catchall" >> Driver "synaptics" >> MatchIsTouchpad "on" >> MatchDevicePath "/dev/input/event*" >> Option "TapButton1" "1" >> Option "TapButton2" "2" >> Option "TapButton3" "3" >> Option "VertEdgeScroll" "on" >> EndSection >> >> When you boot you should have touchpad buttons available even at the >> KDM greeter stage for login - (I guess same for GDM though I am a KDE >> user only) >> >> I have been doing this for several years with my laptops >> >> >> -- >> mike c >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What happend with SystemConfigCleanup?
Hi! What happend with SCC? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemConfigCleanup "Current status Targeted release: Fedora 18 Last updated: 2009-05-19 Percentage of completion: 25%" Is not updated from 2009, have worked only 25% but will be included on F18? How is possible? ---- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: What happend with SystemConfigCleanup?
Mmm... Maybe devel list will be interested to develop this good tool. Somebody wants develop or start develop these tool or create software (control panel) to admin your system with s-c-*(tools)? On Sep 18, 2012 10:39 PM, "Nicola Soranzo" wrote: > Il giorno mar, 18/09/2012 alle 20.11 +0100, Álvaro Castillo ha scritto: > > What happend with SCC? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemConfigCleanup > > > "Current status > > > > Targeted release: Fedora 18 > > Last updated: 2009-05-19 > > Percentage of completion: 25%" > > > > Is not updated from 2009, have worked only 25% but will be included on > > F18? How is possible? > > You missed > > "Category: FeaturePageIncomplete" > at the end of the page, i.e. it is a feature being investigated by the > Fedora community that have not been Proposed or Accepted for a > particular Fedora release. More info at > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy > > Nicola > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17
Web old version? Firefox launch new releases all time. I do no see a web programmers change your code page all time. While follow w3 standards never mind. So, Firefox ESR has got a lot stability and standby updates each some time. So, developers I guess are feel bad with new Firefox way to new release all time because plugins developers need adapt source code of your plugins for Firefox all time. I think is good idea include ESR on repos. Mageia, ScientificLinux... Has got it. FreeBSD has got both on ports and I think has got on binaries too on your servers. On Sep 23, 2012 9:44 PM, "Thorsten Leemhuis" wrote: > On 23.09.2012 13:10, Reindl Harald wrote: > > Am 23.09.2012 13:06, schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > >> Has anybody considered to package the ESR releases for Fedora or is the > >> general consensus "that doesn't make much sense, just leads to confusion > >> and is not worth the trouble". I now and then could need a parallel > >> installed Firefox ESR for a Webinterface that officially only supports > >> ESR releases. I can simply install one in my homedir, but it would be > >> nice to have it yum-installable from the stock Fedora repos (but the > >> problem does not bug me enough to submit a package myself). > > you can not have BOTH in the repos in a way that > > the installation doses not conflict and you are > > missing that switch between both will bring > > you problems with your profile > > Something like that, yeah. > > > YOU may be able to work around them with seperated profiles > > 99 out of 100 users are not and would damage their data > > All that software that is involved is open-source, hence solutions or > workarounds for today's problems could be developed if someone thinks it > is worth the trouble. > > > what is this for webinterface only supporting ESR? > > why in the world should a WEBPAGE not work with a NEWER firefox? > > It's not so much about "work", more about "support", because for a > software vendor it's risky if you are telling your customers that your > software is supporting browsers that are not made yet ;-) Even > supporting state of the art browsers is sometimes something software > companies fail to achieve. Look here for example: > > > https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Virtualization/3.1-Beta/html-single/Administration_Guide/index.html#Jasper_reports_system_requirements > > Quoting: > """ > The Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager Reports tool supports the > following browsers: > > In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5.7 - Firefox 3.6 > > In Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 - Firefox 3.6 > """ > > IOW: If you want it or not, you sometimes need older browsers if you > want to run a supported configuration (the example is bad because here > one even needs a old, EOLed browser and not a Firefox ESR that's still > supported; but you get the idea). > > CU > knurd > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Why is not enabled TapButton of touchpad on Fedora by default?
Please do not call "idiots" anybody this is a community. Respect no a MTV Jersey Shore programm. I do not understand that say Kevin. I talk about No buttons around the touchpad. I speak of the touch pad that allows you to do almost the same as a mouse. A lot users wants enabled by default these touch pad I say. On Sep 26, 2012 4:54 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote: > On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 11:58 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 16:44:16 +0200 > > Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > > > drago01 wrote: > > > > Because some people that can actually use it (i.e I never > > > > accidentally click when trying to move the mouse; maybe you just > > > > have a crappy touchpad?). > > > > > > On my notebook, touchpad tapping is off of course. I have this > > > problem each time I try to use somebody else's touchpad which has > > > tapping enabled. Many different touchpads, always the same problem. > > > So it's not just a particular crappy touchpad. > > > > > I wonder if you have problem with touch-screen smart-phones as well, > > it's essentially the same thing as far as your fingers are concerned. > > > > As it never happened to me, it's kind of a mystery how you can > > accidentally type while moving... Also there's one nice feature on > > touchpads with tap-to-click, that you can double-tap-and-move to > > drag (and drop afterward). > > When lots of people who clearly aren't complete idiots tell you > something happens to them, it's probably best just to accept that it > does, because arguing that you can't possibly see how it could possibly > happen to them is only going to make you look churlish. > > It happens to Kevin, it happens to me, it happens to lots of other > people, which is why the experts in the field have set the default they > have. They didn't make it up out of thin air. > -- > Adam Williamson > Fedora QA Community Monkey > IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora > http://www.happyassassin.net > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?
On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > ** > On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200: > >> Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01: > >>> Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result > >>> into this "old mother" type of user consider to use fedora. > >>> A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications. > >>> Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall behind. > >>> We should lead here like we do in other areas. > >> > >> why do we need to lead everywehre for every price? > >> > >>>> It will be nice if more people uses Fedora, but it not the main target, > >>>> the > >>>> greatness of Fedora is not measured but how many user it have, compared > >>>> to > >>>> other Linuxes or other os'es. > >>> > >>> Well without users (and growth) it will become irrelevant and thus it > >>> will become harder to achieve anything else. > >> > >> nobody says "without users" > >> but do we really need every noob as user? > > > > Why does some of us imply it's about noobs? > Because hardly any of the non-noobs misses this "Software Center" and > because non-noobs know that the term "apps" is an Apple/Google marketing > hype? > > > User experience is important for everyone. Not just noobs. > And currently Fedora is certainly not "first" when it comes on > Applications installation user experience. > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Advantages: - Do not depend on one or more managers to install something. - More easy admin packages for end-users - In desktops or window managers is more practical to use a "software center" on another environment managers and many bookstores such as Openbox, wmii, Fluxbox NOTE: openSUSE has got YaST (good!) withouth remove to Ark. Is no excuse to not create it if you follow the upstream projects like GNOME or KDE. Disadvantages - Much time and effort - Search people interested in doing it -- Álvaro Castillo http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Tools to mount and promote Fedora on cybers.
Hello buddies, I want get more information about Fedora and tools to help on migration of cybers Windows into Fedora. But I only found old software such as Cyborg (2003), or Fedora KIOS Spin unmaintained (I don't know why was stopped maintain it). Can help me, please? Thank you so much! -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Self Introduction - Dan Fruehauf
Welcome Dan! I hope you feel comfortable with Fedora Project community! On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:57 AM, Dan Fruehauf wrote: > Hey there, > > I've just signed up as a package maintainer in Fedora and would like to > introduce NetworkManager-ssh - full SSH VPN integration for NetworkManager. > The review request is here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923564 > > A bit about myself - I've been writing code and using Linux for the last > 15 or so years (since RedHat 5.2), but only recently I've decided to delve > a bit more into open source projects with NetworkManager-ssh as my first > one. I'm looking forward to further improve NetworkManager-SSH and perhaps > also package some other RPMs for Fedora depending on demand. > > Cheers, > Dan. > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: audacity
Please report that to RPMFusion. Not here. As have said before, Fedora does not support mp3 files because is not free and some countries could be prohibed by law. Please contact with RPMfusion people. Greetings! El 28/04/2013 16:28, "Richard Shaw" escribió: > On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Richard Vickery < > richard.vicker...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For F18, it appears that the Audacity mp3 build is broken - it won't >> install - and mp3 support is rather important to me; is it possible to get >> this particular build working? >> > > I think what you're looking for is the audacity-freeworld add-on package > from RPM Fusion, probably best to inquire there, although I think it was on > the FTBFS list for F19, but you may be OK for F18. > > Richard > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
kickstart on LiveUSB creator?
Will be possible to add section to convert your LiveUSB from kickstart file on Fedora live USB Creator tool? Greetings! -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Status to make btsfs to the standard filesystem of Fedora
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones >wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > > > > > So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe > absolutely > > > > > must be fixed before it can become the default > > > > > > > > I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. > > > > > > > > But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that > I'm > > > > pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to losing data and > > > > rendering machines unbootable. > > > > > > I think both of us are making a subjective judgement. For myself, I > > > "want to believe" in btrfs, having championed immutable > > > state/wandering trees, and real databases for many years. > > > > > > BUT I'm deeply unhappy about data corrupting bugs being effectively > > > ignored by upstream for months. That's not good. > > > > > > > > I see no data corruption bugs that have been reported that are being > > ignored, link to the email? The invalidate stuff was causing problems > (not > > a btrfs problem, we just got hurt by it the most), and it looks like > those > > were cleared up. I'm working on the only data corruption problem I know > of > > at the moment and it's not super clear its a data corruption problem. > > The link is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863978 > > Reported upstream here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/20257 > > I'd love this to have been fixed upstream somewhere. It is still > affecting Fedora, but we can pull in the fix if you can point to it. > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com > Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Maybe is not good idea. Wait when btrfs launch officialy a least 1 stable version, because nothing 1 release yet. -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop
I don't think Cinnamon as default desktop. Fedora always was of GNOME by default Desktop. However, I have to choose, I would choose KDE as default desktop. On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Features/Cinnamon as Default Desktop = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Cinnamon_as_Default_Desktop > > Feature owner(s): Eric Smith > > This feature proposes that Fedora switch the default desktop interface from > Gnome 3 to Cinnamon. Cinnamon provides a desktop interface that is more > familiar to Windows and Gnome 2 users than the standard Gnome Shell > interface, > while being built from Gnome 3 components. > > == Detailed description == > The Gnome 3 interface is substantially different that the traditional > desktop > interfaces on both Linux and Windows. While it is good that there is > research > into new user interface concepts, many users prefer to have a traditional > interface that they are accustomed to. Unfortunately it is difficult or > impossible to assess what fraction of the user base prefers Gnome Shell > vs. a > more traditional interface. I'm not trying to start (or continue) a flame > war > here, so I won't state any of my own criticisms of Gnome Shell here, but I > will observe that a number of very high profile people in the Linux > community, > such as Linus Torvalds and Alan Cox, have publicly announce that due to > problems with Gnome Shell they are switching to a different desktop and/or > Linux distribution. > > I submit the proposition that it is easier for a user doing a new Fedora > install to start with a traditional desktop, and switch to the Gnome Shell > if > they prefer that, than to start with Gnome Shell and switch to a > traditional > desktop. > > The Cinnamon desktop provides a traditional desktop while being based on > the > latest Gnome and GTK components, so it seems like a better candidate for a > default desktop than MATE, which is based on older components. > ___ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Problem in Installing Fedora 17
Hi! Have you tried with # touch /forcefsck ? Do on rescue mode as root Greetings! On Feb 17, 2013 5:38 PM, "Rajat Seth" wrote: > While installing fedora 17, i am getting the following error again and > again > > "unrecoverable error > > ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/sda3 > > file system errors left uncorrected > > errors like this usually mean there is a problem with the filesystem that > will require user interaction to repair. > before restarting installation, reboot to rescue mode or another system > that allow you to repair the filesystem interactively. > restart installation after you have corrected the problems on the > filesystem." > > > I had also tried to fix it by running "fsck /dev/sda3" after pressing > Ctrl-Alt-F2 , but it doesn't work. Iam still getting the same error. > Can u please tell me how do i get out of it or how can i fix it ? > Please reply as soon as possible. > > thank you > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Problem in Installing Fedora 17
Sorry... Reboot after, fsck will check your filesystems... On Feb 17, 2013 5:38 PM, "Rajat Seth" wrote: > While installing fedora 17, i am getting the following error again and > again > > "unrecoverable error > > ext4 filesystem check failure on /dev/sda3 > > file system errors left uncorrected > > errors like this usually mean there is a problem with the filesystem that > will require user interaction to repair. > before restarting installation, reboot to rescue mode or another system > that allow you to repair the filesystem interactively. > restart installation after you have corrected the problems on the > filesystem." > > > I had also tried to fix it by running "fsck /dev/sda3" after pressing > Ctrl-Alt-F2 , but it doesn't work. Iam still getting the same error. > Can u please tell me how do i get out of it or how can i fix it ? > Please reply as soon as possible. > > thank you > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
