On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 9:11 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com>wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 03:36:10PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com > >wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Zach Brown wrote: > > > > > So there are a couple of issues with btrfs which I believe > absolutely > > > > > must be fixed before it can become the default > > > > > > > > I'd agree, though I'd have a different list of pet bugs. > > > > > > > > But that's a subjective judgement. I'd be the first to admit that > I'm > > > > pretty risk averse, especially when it comes to losing data and > > > > rendering machines unbootable. > > > > > > I think both of us are making a subjective judgement. For myself, I > > > "want to believe" in btrfs, having championed immutable > > > state/wandering trees, and real databases for many years. > > > > > > BUT I'm deeply unhappy about data corrupting bugs being effectively > > > ignored by upstream for months. That's not good. > > > > > > > > I see no data corruption bugs that have been reported that are being > > ignored, link to the email? The invalidate stuff was causing problems > (not > > a btrfs problem, we just got hurt by it the most), and it looks like > those > > were cleared up. I'm working on the only data corruption problem I know > of > > at the moment and it's not super clear its a data corruption problem. > > The link is: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=863978 > > Reported upstream here: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/20257 > > I'd love this to have been fixed upstream somewhere. It is still > affecting Fedora, but we can pull in the fix if you can point to it. > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com > Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Maybe is not good idea. Wait when btrfs launch officialy a least 1 stable version, because nothing 1 release yet. -- Álvaro Castillo Fedora Project, EMEA ambassador http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Netsys Linux user #547784
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
