Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250510.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

2025-05-10 Thread rawhide
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 43 Rawhide 20250510.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Notable package version changes:
anaconda - 20250507.n.0: anaconda-43.17-1.fc43.src, 20250510.n.0: 
anaconda-43.18-1.fc43.src
python-blivet - 20250507.n.0: python-blivet-3.12.1-2.fc43.src, 20250510.n.0: 
python-blivet-3.12.1-3.fc43.src

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/43

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_43_Rawhide_20250510.n.0_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_43_Rawhide_20250510.n.0_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_43_Rawhide_20250510.n.0_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_43_Rawhide_20250510.n.0_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_43_Rawhide_20250510.n.0_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_43_Rawhide_20250510.n.0_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_43_Rawhide_20250510.n.0_Security_Lab

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Help wanted - Potentially broken use of sysusers.d in systemtap package

2025-05-10 Thread Alex Haydock
Hi,

I'm currently trying to work on fixing a bug which arises when attempting to 
layer the `systemtap-runtime` package on a Fedora Atomic distro. I think this 
is fairly high priority since this package is pulled in as a dependency of 
`qemu`, which is probably fairly commonly used.

Fedora Atomic bug documented here: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2359764

I think this bug comes from the systemtap .spec's use of traditional (non 
sysusers.d) methods to handle user creation. I tried to author a PR to solve 
this issue in the Fedora package repo: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemtap/pull-request/32

After submitting the PR, I was informed that a prior PR had already solved this 
issue: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/systemtap/pull-request/31

That prior PR made it into this recent release, which is now available in F42 
as of a few days ago: 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-fb27254eca

Unfortunately, this hasn't fixed the issue for me. So I'm looking again at the 
spec (maintained upstream) to try and work out what might still be the problem 
and possibly re-factor my PR to properly solve the issue.

I might be completely missing something, but the conditional branching logic 
introduced by the PR above (f892ad26592f97d32984ae088634e82c3c973138) seems to 
be backwards. From what I can tell, the branching conditional logic is actually 
checking for any version of Fedora *below* 42 and runs the updated sysusers.d 
logic if that check matches. This seems to be the opposite of the intended 
logic, as newer Fedora versions should use the newer sysusers.d logic.

I could fix this with a PR but wanted to get some second opinions as I must be 
missing something. A second committer came along afterwards and added 
(fc1a9c24f7167b6c11fed67597141730ee478114) which adds similar logic to check 
for RHEL versions *below* 11.

Any thoughts? If I'm right in thinking this is an error in the logic, I'll try 
and rework my PR.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Noctua Presentation

2025-05-10 Thread Antonio Voza
Hello everyone,
I am Antonio and I work in the Cyber Security field. I would like to start to 
package tools related to the InfoSec in Fedora Official repositories and I am 
searching for a sponsor. I am very new on Fedora, after spending a lot of years 
in Arch. I already started to package tools in COPR and I also submitted one 
article on Fedora Docs at 
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1462

I hope to contribute to Fedora project soon!
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Noctua Presentation

2025-05-10 Thread Antonio Voza
As target for packages, I took as reference the Kali Linux repository where I 
created this README 
https://gitlab.com/athena-rpm/packages/gitlab-profile/-/blob/main/README.md 
with packages to create and packages that are already in Fedora repositories or 
RPM Fusion.

Creating that amount of packages is a huge effort, I would try to package at 
least first the most useful ones.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: How to deal with static libraries and cmake?

2025-05-10 Thread Ben Beasley
I recently had to fix this in the opensubdiv package. As Cristian said, every 
project is different, but here’s one simple example of a successful downstream 
patch:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/opensubdiv/c/fb27f64a61a5eb8fc123132213870dcb4211872e?branch=rawhide

On Sat, May 10, 2025, at 1:53 AM, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> On 10 May 2025 05:42:07 CEST, Orion Poplawski  wrote:
>
>>  * The installation package was faulty and contained
>>
>> "/usr/lib64/cmake/SuiteSparse_config/SuiteSparse_configTargets.cmake"
>>
>>  but not all the files it references.
>>
>>
>>Is there some way that packages can handle having the static libs not be 
>>present in a general way?  I'd like to avoid having to do separate shared and 
>>static builds.
>>
>
> A simple/generic way to do this, unfortunately no. It is a case-by-case basis.
>
> A minimum patch is to find the `install(TARGETS)` commands that mention 
> the static target (directly or indirectly from an expanded list 
> variable) and remove it.
>
> Long term solution is to ask upstream to support optional static 
> library build and/or incremental build+installation. You can ping me 
> upstream if they have issues supporting that.
> -- 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: How to deal with static libraries and cmake?

2025-05-10 Thread Cristian Le via devel


On 10 May 2025 05:42:07 CEST, Orion Poplawski  wrote:

>  * The installation package was faulty and contained
>
> "/usr/lib64/cmake/SuiteSparse_config/SuiteSparse_configTargets.cmake"
>
>  but not all the files it references.
>
>
>Is there some way that packages can handle having the static libs not be 
>present in a general way?  I'd like to avoid having to do separate shared and 
>static builds.
>

A simple/generic way to do this, unfortunately no. It is a case-by-case basis.

A minimum patch is to find the `install(TARGETS)` commands that mention the 
static target (directly or indirectly from an expanded list variable) and 
remove it.

Long term solution is to ask upstream to support optional static library build 
and/or incremental build+installation. You can ping me upstream if they have 
issues supporting that.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Noctua Presentation

2025-05-10 Thread Fabio Alessandro Locati via devel
Hi Antonio,

Welcome to the Fedora Community, and great work so far!
I'm a sponsor and I can work with you on that part :).

Best,
Fale

On Sat, May 10, 2025, at 13:20, Antonio Voza wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I am Antonio and I work in the Cyber Security field. I would like to 
> start to package tools related to the InfoSec in Fedora Official 
> repositories and I am searching for a sponsor. I am very new on Fedora, 
> after spending a lot of years in Arch. I already started to package 
> tools in COPR and I also submitted one article on Fedora Docs at 
> https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1462
>
> I hope to contribute to Fedora project soon!
> -- 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Fabio Alessandro "Fale" Locati
fale.io
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Noctua Presentation

2025-05-10 Thread JT
Antonio,
Welcome.  I'm one of the maintainers of the Fedora Security Lab Release, if
there are newer tools that you're working on packaging that you think would
be a good addition to that release, dont hesitate to reach out to me to
talk about them. I can discuss it with the other maintainers to see how
they'd feel about those tools being added.
JT

On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 7:21 AM Antonio Voza  wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> I am Antonio and I work in the Cyber Security field. I would like to start
> to package tools related to the InfoSec in Fedora Official repositories and
> I am searching for a sponsor. I am very new on Fedora, after spending a lot
> of years in Arch. I already started to package tools in COPR and I also
> submitted one article on Fedora Docs at
> https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1462
>
> I hope to contribute to Fedora project soon!
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Fedora eln compose report: 20250511.n.0 changes

2025-05-10 Thread Fedora ELN Report
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250510.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250511.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   10
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   625.38 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   4.29 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  SDL3-3.2.12-1.eln148
Old package:  SDL3-3.2.10-1.eln147
Summary:  Cross-platform multimedia library
RPMs: SDL3 SDL3-devel
Size: 15.24 MiB
Size change:  90.42 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Neal Gompa  - 3.2.12-1
  - Update to 3.2.12


Package:  ibus-typing-booster-2.27.52-1.eln148
Old package:  ibus-typing-booster-2.27.47-1.eln148
Summary:  A completion input method
RPMs: ibus-typing-booster
Size: 1.34 MiB
Size change:  5.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat May 10 2025 Mike FABIAN  - 2.27.52-1
  - Update to 2.27.52
  - Don???t trigger a new search in emoji-picker when the search entry changes
just by trailing or leading whitespace
  - Improve emoji matching (Resolves: https://github.com/mike-fabian/ibus-
typing-booster/issues/705)
  - Apply the current case mode and normalization only to the parts of the
preedit which do not belong to an ???inner??? preedit (Resolves:
https://github.com/mike-fabian/ibus-typing-booster/issues/717)
  - Show the code point and a comment in the lookup table for control
characters or other invisible characters (Resolves:
https://github.com/mike-fabian/ibus-typing-booster/issues/715)
  - Do not ignore the composition exclusions for Hebrew when normalizing to
NFC (Resolves: https://github.com/mike-fabian/ibus-typing-
booster/issues/716)


Package:  kdenlive-25.04.1-1.eln148
Old package:  kdenlive-25.04.0-3.eln147
Summary:  Non-linear video editor
RPMs: kdenlive
Size: 64.00 MiB
Size change:  -32.40 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat May 10 2025 Steve Cossette  - 25.04.1-1
  - Update to 25.04.1


Package:  linux-firmware-20250509-1.eln148
Old package:  linux-firmware-20250410-1.eln147
Summary:  Firmware files used by the Linux kernel
RPMs: amd-gpu-firmware amd-ucode-firmware atheros-firmware 
brcmfmac-firmware cirrus-audio-firmware dvb-firmware intel-audio-firmware 
intel-gpu-firmware intel-vsc-firmware iwlegacy-firmware iwlwifi-dvm-firmware 
iwlwifi-mvm-firmware libertas-firmware linux-firmware linux-firmware-whence 
mlxsw_spectrum-firmware mrvlprestera-firmware mt7xxx-firmware 
netronome-firmware nvidia-gpu-firmware nxpwireless-firmware qcom-firmware 
realtek-firmware tiwilink-firmware
Size: 540.18 MiB
Size change:  4.22 MiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Peter Robinson  - 20250509-1
  - Update to 20250509
  - Amphion: Update vpu firmware
  - amd_pmf: Update AMD PMF TA Firmware to v3.1
  - amdgpu: update dcn 4.01 firmware to 0.1.8.0
  - qcom: Add link for SM8350 GPU firmware
  - cirrus: cs35l56: Add/update firmware for Cirrus Amps for some ASUS/Lenovo 
laptops
  - update firmware for MT7925 WiFi device
  - mediatek MT7925: update bluetooth firmware to 20250425073330
  - rtw89: 8852c: add tables for dynamic antenna TXPWR
  - rtw89: 8922a: update fw to v0.35.71.0
  - brcm: Add NVRAM file for Radxa Rock Pi X mini PC
  - i915: Update Xe3LPD DMC to v2.23
  - rtl_bt: Update RTL8852B BT USB FW to 0x098B_154B
  - ath11k: WCN6855 hw2.0: update board-2.bin
  - ath11k: IPQ5018 hw1.0: update to WLAN.HK.2.6.0.1-01300-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
  - ath12k: WCN7850 hw2.0: update to 
WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00284-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-3
  - ath12k: QCN9274 hw2.0: update board-2.bin
  - qcom: vpu: update video firmware binary for SA8775p
  - iwlwifi: add/update firmwares to core95-82 release
  - iwlwifi: add Bz-hr FW for core93-123 release
  - qcom: add QUPv3 firmware for QCS9100 platform
  - ASoC: tas2781: Swap channel for SPI projects.
  - bmi260: Add BMI260 IMU initial configuration data file
  - rtl_bt: Update RTL8852BT/RTL8852BE-VT BT USB FW to 0x1881_BA06
  - rtw89: 8922a: update element RF TXPWR to R40
  - rtw89: 8852c: update element RF TXPWR to R78
  - rtw89: 8852c: add fw v0.27.125.0 with format version 2
  - Revert "rtw89: 8852c: update fw to v0.27.125.0"
  - qcom: vpu: add video firmware binary for qcm6490
  - amdgpu: many firmware updates
  - intel: ish: Update license file for ISH
  - intel: avs: Update topology file for I2S for many codecs
  - intel: avs: Update topology file for HDMI/HDAudio codecs
  - intel: avs: Update topology file for Digital Microphone Array
  - xe: Update GUC to v70.44.1 for BMG and LNL
  - i915: Update GUC to v70.44.1 for i915 platforms


Package:  mingw-SDL3-3.2.12-1.eln148
Old package:  mingw-SDL3-3.2.10-1.eln147
Summary:  MinGW Windows port of 

Re: Noctua Presentation

2025-05-10 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 9:09 PM Antonio Voza  wrote:
>
> Hello Fabio, JT, thank you for your messages.
>
> Currently I have a pentesting OS project that is based on Arch Linux and 
> NixOS called Athena OS (https://athenaos.org) that aims to be more focused on 
> Cyber Security learning part. I am trying to migrate it from Arch Linux to 
> Fedora because more secure and stable. I am very new on Fedora. Even if the 
> Athena ISO for Fedora is ready, the biggest missing part is a good number of 
> pentesting tools, and I would get the chance to create and publish them in 
> order to make them available also for Fedora Security Lab.
>
> I just submitted my first package, `python-pycryptodome` that is used as 
> dependency on several pentesting tools I'm going to create as a package. I 
> hope you can give a look to it for review: 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2365478
>

Huh, I think we retired this years ago in favor of
python-pycryptodomex:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycryptodomex

If you've still got projects using pycryptodome, you should port them
to pycryptodomex.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


z3 soname bump

2025-05-10 Thread Jerry James
In about a week, I will update the z3 package from version 4.14.1 to
version 4.15.0.  That update involves an soname bump, so I will also
rebuild prusa-slicer, currently the only package in Fedora that
depends directly on the z3 library.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250510.n.0 changes

2025-05-10 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250509.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250510.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   75
Downgraded packages: 1

Size of added packages:  10.75 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   1.86 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 6.31 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   11.92 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 23.82 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: gpgverify-2.1-3.fc43
Summary: Signature verifier for easy and safe scripting
RPMs:gpgverify
Size:10.75 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  AMF-1:1.4.36-1.fc43
Old package:  AMF-1.4.36.0-1.fc43
Summary:  Advanced Media Framework (AMF) SDK
RPMs: AMF-devel AMF-docs AMF-samples
Size: 3.51 MiB
Size change:  458 B
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Simone Caronni  - 1:1.4.36-1
  - All references to 1.4.36.0 have disappeared completely from the git
repository and 1.4.36 has been released in place. Bump Epoch to point to
a real release.


Package:  ags-3.6.2.9-1.fc43
Old package:  ags-3.6.2.7-1.fc43
Summary:  Engine for creating and running videogames of adventure (quest) 
genre
RPMs: ags
Size: 5.33 MiB
Size change:  24.71 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Dominik Mierzejewski  - 3.6.2.9-1
  - update to 3.6.2.9
  - regenerate glad sources


Package:  android-tools-1:35.0.2-5.fc43
Old package:  android-tools-1:35.0.2-3.fc43
Summary:  Android platform tools(adb, fastboot)
RPMs: android-tools
Size: 3.83 MiB
Size change:  -60.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 LuK1337  - 1:35.0.2-4
  - Remove generate_build.rb

  * Fri May 09 2025 LuK1337  - 1:35.0.2-5
  - Remove adb.service and udev rules


Package:  apcupsd-3.14.14-37.fc43
Old package:  apcupsd-3.14.14-35.fc43
Summary:  APC UPS Power Control Daemon
RPMs: apcupsd apcupsd-cgi apcupsd-gui
Size: 1.64 MiB
Size change:  2.99 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Apr 23 2025 Davide Cavalca  - 3.14.14-36
  - Fix libusb conditional to make it build on EPEL 10
Fixes: RHBZ#2337139

  * Fri May 09 2025 Gwyn Ciesla  - 3.14.14-37
  - Move binaries from sbin to bin, 2365293.


Package:  atomic-reactor-4.19.1-2.fc43
Old package:  atomic-reactor-4.19.0-2.fc43
Summary:  Improved builder for Docker images
RPMs: atomic-reactor python3-atomic-reactor
Size: 589.01 KiB
Size change:  147 B

Package:  barman-3.13.3-1.fc43
Old package:  barman-3.13.2-1.fc43
Summary:  Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL
RPMs: barman barman-cli python3-barman
Size: 830.00 KiB
Size change:  2.30 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Simone Caronni  - 3.13.3-1
  - Update to 3.13.3


Package:  ccache-4.11.3-1.fc43
Old package:  ccache-4.11.2-1.fc43
Summary:  C/C++ compiler cache
RPMs: ccache
Size: 2.59 MiB
Size change:  7.61 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Orion Poplawski  - 4.11.3-1
  - Update to 4.11.3


Package:  cfn-lint-1.35.1-1.fc43
Old package:  cfn-lint-1.35.0-1.fc43
Summary:  CloudFormation Linter
RPMs: cfn-lint cfn-lint+full cfn-lint+graph cfn-lint+junit 
cfn-lint+sarif
Size: 5.14 MiB
Size change:  14.33 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu May 08 2025 Packit  - 1.35.1-1
  - Update to 1.35.1 upstream release
  - Resolves: rhbz#2365134


Package:  chkconfig-1.33-1.fc43
Old package:  chkconfig-1.32-1.fc43
Summary:  A system tool for maintaining the /etc/rc*.d hierarchy
RPMs: alternatives chkconfig ntsysv
Size: 989.16 KiB
Size change:  -12.34 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Lukas Nykryn  - 1.33-1
  - alternatives: ignore all bin/sbin differences on systems with merged 
bin/sbin


Package:  cpp-httplib-0.20.1-1.fc43
Old package:  cpp-httplib-0.19.0-1.fc43
Summary:  A C++11 single-file header-only cross platform HTTP/HTTPS library
RPMs: cpp-httplib-devel
Size: 375.20 KiB
Size change:  1.55 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Orion Poplawski  - 0.20.1-1
  - Update to 0.20.1


Package:  cpu-x-5.3.0-1.fc43
Old package:  cpu-x-5.2.0-3.fc43
Summary:  Free software that gathers information on CPU, motherboard and 
more
RPMs: cpu-x cpu-x-data
Size: 3.03 MiB
Size change:  4.89 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri May 09 2025 Martin Gansser  - 5.3.0-1
  - Update to 5.3.0


Package:  filesystem-3.18-44.fc43
Old package:  filesystem-3.18-41.fc43
Summary:  The basic directory layout for a Linux system
RPMs: filesystem filesystem-content filesystem-srpm-macros
Size: 5.49 MiB
Size change:  6.20 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed May 07 2025 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek  - 3.18-43
  - When merging sbin, also accept symlinks to /usr/bin/foo

  * Wed May 07 2025 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek  - 3.18-44
  - Also merge symlinks to /etc/alternatives


Package:  fractal-11-1.fc43

Re: Inactive packagers removed from the packager group

2025-05-10 Thread Georg Sauthoff
Hello,

I take quassel and sunwait.

Best regards,
Georg

-- 
'Der Lerm aber ist die impertinenteste aller Unterbrechungen, da
 er sogar unsere eigenen Gedanken unterbricht, ja, zerbricht. Wo
 jedoch nichts zu unterbrechen ist, da wird er freilich nicht
 sonderlich empfunden werden.'
(Arthur Schopenhauer, Ueber Lerm und Geräusch. 1851)
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Noctua Presentation

2025-05-10 Thread Antonio Voza
Hello Fabio, JT, thank you for your messages.

Currently I have a pentesting OS project that is based on Arch Linux and NixOS 
called Athena OS (https://athenaos.org) that aims to be more focused on Cyber 
Security learning part. I am trying to migrate it from Arch Linux to Fedora 
because more secure and stable. I am very new on Fedora. Even if the Athena ISO 
for Fedora is ready, the biggest missing part is a good number of pentesting 
tools, and I would get the chance to create and publish them in order to make 
them available also for Fedora Security Lab.

I just submitted my first package, `python-pycryptodome` that is used as 
dependency on several pentesting tools I'm going to create as a package. I hope 
you can give a look to it for review: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2365478

Thank you again
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Noctua Presentation

2025-05-10 Thread Cristian Le via devel


On 11 May 2025 03:24:14 CEST, Neal Gompa  wrote:
>Huh, I think we retired this years ago in favor of
>python-pycryptodomex:
>https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycryptodomex
>
>If you've still got projects using pycryptodome, you should port them
>to pycryptodomex.
>

I believe you are confusing it with python-crypto. There was recent discussion 
about this on python channel. Afaiu pycryptodome and pyrcryptodomex are the 
same package with different namespace. Why pycryptodome was retired is very 
mysterious to me as I read about it. Whether projects *should* be migrating to 
pycryptodomex was also unclear.
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue