Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250309.n.1 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250308.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250309.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:5 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 57 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 375.77 KiB Size of dropped packages:10.81 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 2.38 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 1.26 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Scientific_KDE raw-xz aarch64 Path: Labs/aarch64/images/Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Disk-Rawhide-20250309.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz Image: i3 live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20250309.n.1.iso Image: Scientific vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-libvirt-Rawhide-20250309.n.1.x86_64.vagrant.libvirt.box Image: Scientific vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-VirtualBox-Rawhide-20250309.n.1.x86_64.vagrant.virtualbox.box Image: Scientific vagrant-libvirt aarch64 Path: Labs/aarch64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-libvirt-Rawhide-20250309.n.1.aarch64.vagrant.libvirt.box = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: rust-ashpd0.9-0.9.2-1.fc43 Summary: XDG portals wrapper in Rust using zbus RPMs:rust-ashpd0.9+async-std-devel rust-ashpd0.9+default-devel rust-ashpd0.9+gdk4wayland-devel rust-ashpd0.9+gdk4x11-devel rust-ashpd0.9+glib-devel rust-ashpd0.9+gtk4-devel rust-ashpd0.9+gtk4_wayland-devel rust-ashpd0.9+gtk4_x11-devel rust-ashpd0.9+pipewire-devel rust-ashpd0.9+tokio-devel rust-ashpd0.9+tracing-devel rust-ashpd0.9-devel Size:166.00 KiB Package: rust-calloop0.13-0.13.0-1.fc43 Summary: Callback-based event loop RPMs:rust-calloop0.13+async-task-devel rust-calloop0.13+block_on-devel rust-calloop0.13+default-devel rust-calloop0.13+executor-devel rust-calloop0.13+futures-io-devel rust-calloop0.13+nix-devel rust-calloop0.13+pin-utils-devel rust-calloop0.13+signals-devel rust-calloop0.13-devel Size:127.13 KiB Package: rust-reis0.2-0.2.0-1.fc43 Summary: Pure Rust implementation of libei/libeis protocol RPMs:rust-reis0.2+calloop-devel rust-reis0.2+default-devel rust-reis0.2+futures-devel rust-reis0.2+tokio-devel rust-reis0.2-devel Size:82.64 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: python-django-4.2.16-1.fc42 Summary: A high-level Python Web framework RPMs:python-django-bash-completion Size:10.81 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: auryn-0.8.3-11.fc43 Old package: auryn-0.8.3-10.fc42 Summary: Plastic Recurrent Network Simulator RPMs: auryn auryn-devel auryn-mpich auryn-mpich-devel auryn-openmpi auryn-openmpi-devel Size: 9.56 MiB Size change: -11.56 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 09 2025 Benjamin A. Beasley - 0.8.3-11 - Patch for CMake 4 Package: castxml-0.6.11-2.fc43 Old package: castxml-0.6.11-1.fc43 Summary: C-family abstract syntax tree XML output tool RPMs: castxml Size: 3.46 MiB Size change: 181.65 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 09 2025 Mattias Ellert - 0.6.11-2 - Adjust expected test output for clang 20 ppc64le Package: eterm-0.9.6-41.fc43 Old package: eterm-0.9.6-38.fc41 Summary: Enlightened terminal emulator RPMs: eterm Size: 8.84 MiB Size change: 8.11 KiB Changelog: * Wed Aug 28 2024 Miroslav Such?? - 0.9.6-39 - convert license to SPDX * Thu Jan 16 2025 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.9.6-40 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild * Sun Mar 09 2025 Terje Rosten - 0.9.6-41 - Revert to C17 Package: fawltydeps-0.19.0-3.fc43 Old package: fawltydeps-0.18.0-3.fc42 Summary: Find undeclared and unused 3rd-party dependencies in your Python project RPMs: fawltydeps fawltydeps+uv Size: 145.09 KiB Size change: -7.33 KiB Changelog: * Fri Feb 28 2025 Packit - 0.19.0-1 - Update to 0.19.0 upstream release - Resolves: rhbz#2349018 Package: fcft-3.2.0-1.fc43 Old package: fcft-3.1.10-2.fc42 Summary: Simple library for font loading and glyph rasterization RPMs: fcft fcft-devel Size: 558.41 KiB Size change: 30.34 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 08 2025 Aleksei Bavshin - 3.2.0-1 - Update to 3.2.0 (#2350079) Package: focuswriter-1.8.11-1.fc43 Old package: focuswriter-1.8.10-1.fc43 Summary: A full screen, distraction-free writing program RPMs: focuswriter Size: 25.07 MiB Size change: -7.89 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 09 2025 Vojtech Trefny - 1.8.11-1 - Update to 1.8.11 (#2350615) Package: freeipmi-1.6.15-3.fc43 Old package: freeipmi-1.6.14-3.fc41 Summary: IPMI remote console and system management software RPMs: freeipmi freeipmi-bmc-watchdog freeipmi-devel freeipmi-ipmidetectd freeipmi-ipmiseld Size: 11.69 MiB Size change: -93.26 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jan 16 2025 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.6.14-4 - Rebuilt for
2025-03-10 @ **16:00** UTC - Fedora 42 Blocker Review Meeting
# F42 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2025-03-10 # Time: **16:00** UTC # Location: https://matrix.to/#/#blocker-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 42 blocker review meeting! We have 4 proposed blockers and 3 proposed freeze exceptions for Beta, and 2 proposed blockers for Final. Note that as clocks went forward in North America this weekend, the meeting is now at 1600 UTC. If you changed your clocks this weekend, the meeting will be at the same local time as before. If you didn't, the meeting will be an hour earlier in your local time. Here is a handy link which should show you the meeting time in your local time: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=Fedora+41+Blocker+review+meeting&iso=20250310T16&p1=1440&ah=2 The meeting will be on Matrix. Click the link above to join in a web client - you can authenticate with your FAS account - or use a dedicated client of your choosing. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!** We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F42 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good weekend and see you on Monday! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Konflux: What is the right time?
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025, at 9:00 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Well, you don't need to deploy it for yourself, really. There is a > public test Fedora deployment where you can play with it: > > https://github.com/konflux-ci/community/blob/main/sigs/fedora/cluster.md I know you're probably not the right person to ask but you (or others in this thread) might know who to ask. Is that instance supposed to be working and if so. Do you know where we can report issues if it isn't? It's throwing a whole bunch of javascript errors ... and isn't working even for the bits that do work. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Installing Forgejo from the Fedora repository doesn't end with a working instance – at least for me
On Sun, Mar 9, 2025 at 7:35 PM Michel Lind wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 9:46 PM, Peter Boy Uni wrote: > >> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams : > >> > >> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said: > >>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for > >>> x86_64. A aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a > >>> version 9 in COPR). > >> > >> As far as I can tell, that's not true. I'm not sure where you found it, > >> but there's no Forgejo RPMs in the standard Fedora repos, just the > >> python API client library (python-pyforgejo). > > > > You are right. I removed the COPR forgejo repo from /etc/yum.d but > > missed that the forgejo rpm was still there. So a ‚dnf search forgejo‘ > > still found it. And I happily assumed it was in the Fedora repo. > > > > > >> There appear to be a number of COPR repos with Forgejo, looks like most > >> have expected setup steps on the COPR page for it. If that's where you > >> got it, you should probably start with what the packager says there. > > > > Yes, the mdwalters:forgejo seemed to me to be the most advanced > > version, measured by the number of downloads and the documentation. But > > it's probably not. > > > > We should probably try and get this into Fedora proper, right? Ideally > everything needed by Fedora infrastructure is in Fedora itself, it took us a > few years to get there with mailman so the earlier we start the better > Yes indeed, starting now would allow us to start on the right foot. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Installing Forgejo from the Fedora repository doesn't end with a working instance – at least for me
On Sat, Mar 8, 2025, at 9:46 PM, Peter Boy Uni wrote: >> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams : >> >> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said: >>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64. >>> A aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a version 9 in >>> COPR). >> >> As far as I can tell, that's not true. I'm not sure where you found it, >> but there's no Forgejo RPMs in the standard Fedora repos, just the >> python API client library (python-pyforgejo). > > You are right. I removed the COPR forgejo repo from /etc/yum.d but > missed that the forgejo rpm was still there. So a ‚dnf search forgejo‘ > still found it. And I happily assumed it was in the Fedora repo. > > >> There appear to be a number of COPR repos with Forgejo, looks like most >> have expected setup steps on the COPR page for it. If that's where you >> got it, you should probably start with what the packager says there. > > Yes, the mdwalters:forgejo seemed to me to be the most advanced > version, measured by the number of downloads and the documentation. But > it's probably not. > We should probably try and get this into Fedora proper, right? Ideally everything needed by Fedora infrastructure is in Fedora itself, it took us a few years to get there with mailman so the earlier we start the better Best regards, -- _o) Michel Lind _( ) identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2 README: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Salimma#README -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
F42 Beta blockers report
Ahead of the F42 Beta Blocker meeting[1] tomorrow, Monday March 10 and the F42 Beta Go/No-Go meeting[2] on Thursday, March 13, please review the below report on current F42 Beta blockers[3]. Your help discussing and resolving any outstanding bugs would be greatly appreciated. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. anaconda — "EFI System Partition" does not show in available filesystems for custom installs since blivet 3.12.0 — VERIFIED ACTION: QA has verified most recent update as working and a fix is available FEDORA-2025-73a6f8a23c 2. anaconda — anaconda text mode installer fails to run on fallback — VERIFIED ACTION: QA has verified most recent update as working FEDORA-2025-5235a700a8 3. anaconda — Cannot install to a software RAID device created in the storage editor as it's impossible to assign the root mount point successfully — VERIFIED ACTION: QA has verified most recent update as working FEDORA-2025-73a6f8a23c (anaconda-42.27.3-1.fc42 anaconda-webui-26-1.fc42) 4. gcc — Broken support for C++ coroutines in GCC 15 breaks qcoro, which breaks Plasma Discover — ON_QA ACTION: QA to verify fix in https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6a12d86df4 Proposed blockers - 1. mutter — Update mutter to version 48~rc-2.fc43 broke a lot of gnome-* applications and broke appearing a file save dialog in Chrome-based browsers and Telegram messenger when I try to save a file — NEW ACTION: Upstream to diagnose issue. 2. systemd — The dev-gpt-auto-root.device times out and makes the system not bootable. — NEW ACTION: Maintainer to diagnose issue. Bug-by-bug detail = Accepted blockers - 1. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346436 — VERIFIED "EFI System Partition" does not show in available filesystems for custom installs since blivet 3.12.0 There seemed to be an issue with the ability to discover what filesystems are available when partitioning. "EFI System Partition" does not show as available, which means users cannot create an ESP for UEFI installs. FEDORA-2025-73a6f8a23c was submitted as a candidate fix and has been tested and verified by QA. 2. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2349658 — VERIFIED anaconda text mode installer fails to run on fallback When installing via a serial console the installer detects that there's no graphical and prompts to fall back to text mode and then crashes. FEDORA-2025-5235a700a8 contains a verified fix. 3. anaconda — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2344434 — VERIFIED Cannot install to a software RAID device created in the storage editor as it's impossible to assign the root mount point successfully A test case for GTK UI describes the best way to configure the software raid setup, which says to create an MD array mounted as / and optionally a second array mounted as /home. If users configure the software raid setup following this guidance, the issue is resolved. FEDORA-2025-73a6f8a23c (anaconda-42.27.3-1.fc42 and anaconda-webui-26-1.fc42) has been pushed to updates testing repo. 4. gcc — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2342065 — ON_QA Broken support for C++ coroutines in GCC 15 breaks qcoro, which breaks Plasma Discover Discover is functional when installing on F41, but as the most recent version of gcc contains some updates that are seemingly incompatible with C++ coroutines coruntimes, it causes Plasma Discover to fail in F42 (see https://gcc.gnu.org/r15-3840 and https://gcc.gnu.org/PR107637 for more details). An upstream PR was submitted for gcc https://gcc.gnu.orgg:a1855a3e0bcf0f94bc9fa421ccc9ebd0565c62cd, however there are still continued issues with plasma-nm. An update has been submitted, and QA will verify https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-6a12d86df4 Proposed blockers - 1. mutter — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2350866 — NEW Update mutter to version 48~rc-2.fc43 broke a lot of gnome-* applications and broke appearing a file save dialog in Chrome-based browsers and Telegram messenger when I try to save a file A number of gnome applications are failing with the latest version of mutter 48~rc-2.fc43. This seems to be affecting gnome-control-center, gnome-calculator and gnome-maps. There is also no file save dialogue option for saving files when using chrome-based browsers or the Telegram application with this update. 2. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2350605 — NEW The dev-gpt-auto-root.device times out and makes the system not bootable. On Fedora 42 Beta 1.2 non-live isos, i.e. on Everything and Server netinst, and Server DVD iso, the dev-gpt-auto-root.device times out during the installation and the system ends up in an emergency console, thus becoming not installable. This seems to be just affecting bare metal installs. VMs are currently unaffected. The suspected cause of the issue is 'systemd-gpt-auto-generator i
Re: Problems aftes update to F42
On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 7:40 AM Filip Bartmann wrote: > > Hello, > I mean, that in gdm aren't listed other X11 sessions such as IceWM and > others. So GDM don't support these sessions in future? So I must switch to > lightdm? > Yes. You can use LightDM if you need to use X11 sessions. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Konflux: What is the right time?
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:31 -0800, Michel Lind wrote: > If this is both too heavy to evaluate on recent hardware, and also not > reproducibly deployable, it seems to currently be in a state where it has all > the drawbacks of Kubernetes but none of the benefits yet? Maybe we should get > to a point where people can reasonably deploy it before considering it ready > to be evaluated. Well, you don't need to deploy it for yourself, really. There is a public test Fedora deployment where you can play with it: https://github.com/konflux-ci/community/blob/main/sigs/fedora/cluster.md -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora eln compose report: 20250310.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250309.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250310.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 4 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 5.62 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 63.44 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 205.66 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: python-django4.2-4.2.20-1.eln146 Summary: A high-level Python Web framework RPMs:python3-django4.2 Size:5.62 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: ibus-1.5.32~rc1-3.eln146 Old package: ibus-1.5.32~rc1-2.eln146 Summary: Intelligent Input Bus for Linux OS RPMs: ibus ibus-devel ibus-devel-docs ibus-gtk3 ibus-gtk4 ibus-libs ibus-panel ibus-setup ibus-wayland Size: 61.35 MiB Size change: 4.89 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 09 2025 Takao Fujiwara - 1.5.32~rc1-3 - Send RequireSurroundingText method with engine active-surrounding-text property Package: kmod-34.1-1.eln146 Old package: kmod-34-1.eln146 Summary: Linux kernel module management utilities RPMs: kmod kmod-devel kmod-libs Size: 930.11 KiB Size change: -98 B Changelog: * Sat Mar 08 2025 Josh Boyer - 34.1-1 - New upstream v34.1 - Resolves: rhbz#2350269 Package: libidn2-2.3.8-1.eln146 Old package: libidn2-2.3.7-3.eln145 Summary: Library to support IDNA2008 internationalized domain names RPMs: idn2 libidn2 libidn2-devel Size: 1.05 MiB Size change: 200.96 KiB Changelog: * Sun Mar 09 2025 Robert Scheck 2.3.8-1 - Upgrade to 2.3.8 (#2350924) Package: xorg-x11-xauth-1:1.1.4-1.eln146 Old package: xorg-x11-xauth-1:1.1.3-3.eln145 Summary: X.Org X11 X authority utilities RPMs: xorg-x11-xauth Size: 140.07 KiB Size change: -99 B Changelog: * Sun Mar 09 2025 Dr. Tilmann Bubeck - 1:1.1.4-1 - Update to 1.1.4 (#2350930) = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
