SONAME BUMP openh264
Hi, I updated openh264 to version 2.6.0 in rawhide in order to fix some security issues. This change however comes with an SO bump and it would require rebuilds of affected packages. I have made a build of the new openh264 in a side tag f43-build-side-106953 It looks like these packages will need a rebuild: chromium freerdp freerdp2 gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 libavcodec-free libheif mozilla-openh264 noopenh264 qt6-qtwebengine telegram-desktop xrdp I'll wait a while before submitting the bodhi side-tag update to make sure your rebuild is in it, Wim -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-gsplit-dwarf vs RPM find-debuginfo ?
The QEMU community is discussing possible use of -gsplit-dwarf as a default option for QEMU's build system: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-03/msg00424.html This option causes debug symbols to be written to separate .dwo files instead of the .o files or final executables. I tested a Fedora RPM build with this set and somewhat unsurprisingly it appears breaks the creation of debuginfo packages. The kernel can use -gsplit-dwarf but they've hidden it behind a Kconfig option that Fedora's kernel packages don't turn on. Does anyone have any experiance with -gsplit-dwarf from other packages in Fedora. Is this is a showstopper for -debuginfo package creation, or is there an easy fix I don't know about (aside from patching QEMU to remove -gsplit-dwarf from CFLAGS downstream of course). With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SONAME BUMP openh264
mozilla-openh264 is a subpackages of openh264 Dennis On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 5:40 AM Wim Taymans wrote: > > Hi, > > I updated openh264 to version 2.6.0 in rawhide in order to fix some security > issues. This change however comes with an SO bump and it would require > rebuilds of affected packages. > > I have made a build of the new openh264 in a side tag f43-build-side-106953 > > It looks like these packages will need a rebuild: > > chromium > freerdp > freerdp2 > gstreamer1-plugin-openh264 > libavcodec-free > libheif > mozilla-openh264 > noopenh264 > qt6-qtwebengine > telegram-desktop > xrdp > > I'll wait a while before submitting the bodhi side-tag update to make sure > your rebuild is > in it, > > Wim > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade. In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in next Fedora. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already lots of "Fails to install" (F42FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2300529&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=__open__&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cbug_severity&list_id=13558325&order=id%2C%20&query_format=advanced For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines on renaming and replacing packages: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages I myself discovered one issue with workrave and kf5-kitinerary and reported them. Thank you Miroslav-- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
Tested on three machines running Fedora 41; two of them were a-okay, one had some errors: > Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-38.fc37.x86_64 > requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed > - xml-commons-apis-1.4.01-47.fc41.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package > Problem 2: cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.6-1.fc42.x86_64 from > updates-testing and jsoncpp-1.9.5-9.fc42.x86_64 from fedora > - installed package torque-libs-6.1.3-13.fc41.x86_64 requires > libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > jsoncpp-1.9.5-8.fc41.x86_64 > - jsoncpp-1.9.5-8.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > Problem 3: installed package torque-libs-6.1.3-13.fc41.x86_64 requires > libjsoncpp.so.25()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.6-1.fc42.x86_64 from updates-testing and > jsoncpp-1.9.5-8.fc41.x86_64 from @System > - cannot install both jsoncpp-1.9.6-1.fc42.x86_64 from updates-testing and > jsoncpp-1.9.5-9.fc42.x86_64 from fedora > - package cmake-3.31.6-2.fc42.x86_64 from updates-testing requires > libjsoncpp.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - installed package torque-6.1.3-13.fc41.x86_64 requires > libtorque.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install the best update candidate for package > cmake-3.30.7-1.fc41.x86_64 > - problem with installed package A.FI. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SONAME BUMP openh264
Wim Taymans wrote: > Hi, > I updated openh264 to version 2.6.0 in rawhide in order to fix some > noopenh264 > Wim You will need to update noopenh264 to match openh264 https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/noopenh264/-/tags -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: -gsplit-dwarf vs RPM find-debuginfo ?
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:44:18AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > The QEMU community is discussing possible use of -gsplit-dwarf as a default > option for QEMU's build system: > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2025-03/msg00424.html > > This option causes debug symbols to be written to separate .dwo files > instead of the .o files or final executables. Don't. -gsplit-dwarf is something to get faster link times at the expense of slower debugging and more files around. So, it can be useful for fast modify/rebuild/test cycles during development, but is something that is really undesirable for the distro builds. There you don't mind slightly longer link times, that is done once per build, but having to ship larger debug info and especially when it is split into hundreds or thousands of small files is then a price everybody who downloads the package debuginfo pays. debugedit can't deal with it, dwz can't either, in order to ship something reasonable one would need to dwp the separate debug info back into the normal debug info. Jakub -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SONAME BUMP openh264
On Tue, Mar 4 2025 at 02:46:12 PM -00:00:00, Leigh Scott wrote: You will need to update noopenh264 to match openh264 Yes, noopenh264 is what packages are actually built against. We'll need to do a new noopenh264 build using f43-build-side-106953 first, then once that's finished other maintainers can start their rebuilds. (The new builds won't actually work properly until the new openh264 builds are released by Cisco, though.) -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Multiple kernels
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 7:14 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite > wrote: >> >> >> Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as >> OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on >> devices with a wide range of compute capabilities - in particular mobile and >> edge devices. Is this something Fedora would consider doing? This would >> potentially benefit spins aimed for mobile and desktop use. > > So, the concept of flavors exists, and there is a possibility that we > could enable some additional flavors at some point. I know I have > been asked about rt kernels, 64K page size kernels for aarch64, etc. > The biggest problem we run into is the way that koji works.Each > arch is serialized, meaning if we add another flavor of aarch64, it > will double the build time for aarch64 kernels. It may be good to allow others to leverage the software infrastructure. Hardware manufacturers may want to provide an optimized Fedora build or a fully libre Fedora build. They may be willing to donate build cycles to support this. > Because Fedora is > completely open, I have no way to "stage" builds for things like > embargoed CVEs. This means that I can't commit the fix and start the > build until said CVE is public. As a result, each additional flavor > would have a significant impact on how quickly we can get critical CVE > fixes out to users. This is one of the main reasons that I am very > careful about additional flavors. I did float a proposal about > parallelizing builds which might make this less of an issue, though it > still wouldn't completely open flood gates. Fedora is only going to > support additional flavors officially if there are actual users and > testers to ensure that it is both worth the effort, and can maintain > some semblance of quality. Having criteria for official inclusion and removal is good. > > Justin > >> Benson -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
Here's what im seeing [sudo] password for ox: Updating and loading repositories: created by dnf config-manager from https://repo.nordvpn.com//yum/nordvpn/centos/x86_64 100% | 6.4 KiB/s | 1.5 KiB | 00m00s Unity Hub 100% | 1.7 KiB/s | 2.1 KiB | 00m01s google-chrome-canary 100% | 13.2 KiB/s | 1.3 KiB | 00m00s google-chrome 100% | 8.8 KiB/s | 1.3 KiB | 00m00s Copr repo for PyCharm owned by phracek 100% | 7.3 KiB/s | 4.1 KiB | 00m01s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver 100% | 18.7 KiB/s | 15.6 KiB | 00m01s Fedora 42 - x86_64 100% | 12.8 MiB/s | 35.2 MiB | 00m03s Fedora 42 - x86_64 - Test Updates 100% | 2.4 MiB/s | 3.0 MiB | 00m01s Fedora 42 - x86_64 - Updates 100% | 22.3 KiB/s | 31.9 KiB | 00m01s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Free - Updates 100% | 8.8 KiB/s | 9.8 KiB | 00m01s Fedora 42 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 100% | 7.0 KiB/s | 6.0 KiB | 00m01s google-chrome-canary 100% | 9.9 KiB/s | 3.2 KiB | 00m00s google-chrome 100% | 8.2 KiB/s | 3.2 KiB | 00m00s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree 100% | 97.0 KiB/s | 84.0 KiB | 00m01s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Free 100% | 199.2 KiB/s | 158.2 KiB | 00m01s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree - Updates 100% | 15.8 KiB/s | 11.8 KiB | 00m01s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree - Steam 100% | 16.4 KiB/s | 11.5 KiB | 00m01s Repositories loaded. Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem 1: installed package hsakmt-devel-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 requires libhsakmt.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package hsakmt-devel-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 requires hsakmt(x86-64) = 1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed - hsakmt-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package Problem 2: installed package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 - java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: installed package mumble-1.4.287-5.fc41.x86_64 requires libPocoFoundation.so.103()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package mumble-1.4.287-5.fc41.x86_64 - poco-foundation-1.13.3-2.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 4: problem with installed package - installed package mumble-1.4.287-5.fc41.x86_64 requires libPocoXML.so.103()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package mumble-1.4.287-5.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires libPocoXML.so.103()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - poco-xml-1.13.3-2.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 5: problem with installed package - installed package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed - java-17-openjdk-headless-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository You can try to add to command line: --no-best to not limit the transaction to the best candidates --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 3:26 PM John Reiser wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run: > > > > dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best > > distro-sync > > I was surprised by 16 detected downgrades. > > Downgrading: (Consecutive spaces are collapsed to avoid line wrap): > > c
License change: scummvm/scummvm-tools
Hi, scummvm-2.9.0: - added: BSL-1.0 - now: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and ISC and Catharon AND Apache-2.0 AND BSL-1.0 scummvm-tools-2.9.0 - added: BSD-2-Clause - now: License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and BSD-2-Clause I'm aware that the remaining LicenseRef-Callaway entries need to be resolved. Any help would be highly appreciated! Best regards, Christian -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Multiple kernels
On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite wrote: > > > Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as OpenHarmony > support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on devices with a wide > range of compute capabilities - in particular mobile and edge devices. Is > this something Fedora would consider doing? This would potentially benefit > spins aimed for mobile and desktop use. So, the concept of flavors exists, and there is a possibility that we could enable some additional flavors at some point. I know I have been asked about rt kernels, 64K page size kernels for aarch64, etc. The biggest problem we run into is the way that koji works.Each arch is serialized, meaning if we add another flavor of aarch64, it will double the build time for aarch64 kernels. Because Fedora is completely open, I have no way to "stage" builds for things like embargoed CVEs. This means that I can't commit the fix and start the build until said CVE is public. As a result, each additional flavor would have a significant impact on how quickly we can get critical CVE fixes out to users. This is one of the main reasons that I am very careful about additional flavors. I did float a proposal about parallelizing builds which might make this less of an issue, though it still wouldn't completely open flood gates. Fedora is only going to support additional flavors officially if there are actual users and testers to ensure that it is both worth the effort, and can maintain some semblance of quality. Justin > Benson > > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync I was surprised by 16 detected downgrades. Downgrading: (Consecutive spaces are collapsed to avoid line wrap): criu x86_64 4.0-3.fc42fedora 1.6 MiB replacing criu x86_64 4.0-4.fc41updates 1.5 MiB criu-libs x86_64 4.0-3.fc42fedora 87.1 KiB replacing criu-libsx86_64 4.0-4.fc41updates 84.7 KiB firefox x86_64 135.0-1.fc42 fedora 234.8 MiB replacing firefoxx86_64 135.0.1-1.fc41 updates 234.1 MiB firefox-langpacks x86_64 135.0-1.fc42fedora 40.7 MiB replacing firefox-langpacks x86_64 135.0.1-1.fc41 updates 40.7 MiB gnome-mapsx86_64 47.2-2.fc42 fedora 5.5 MiB replacing gnome-maps x86_64 47.3-1.fc41 updates 5.5 MiB gnome-remote-desktop x86_64 47.2-1.fc42 fedora 1.6 MiB replacing gnome-remote-desktop x86_64 47.3-1.fc41 updates 1.6 MiB gtk-vnc2 x86_64 1.5.0-1.fc42 fedora 228.0 KiB replacing gtk-vnc2 x86_64 1.5.0-2.fc41 updates 232.1 KiB gvnc x86_64 1.5.0-1.fc42 fedora 238.7 KiB replacing gvnc x86_64 1.5.0-2.fc41updates 242.9 KiB gvncpulse x86_64 1.5.0-1.fc42 fedora 45.8 KiB replacing gvncpulsex86_64 1.5.0-2.fc41 updates 50.0 KiB httpd x86_64 2.4.62-6.fc42 fedora 64.6 KiB replacing httpd x86_64 2.4.63-1.fc41 updates 64.8 KiB httpd-corex86_64 2.4.62-6.fc42 fedora 4.8 MiB replacing httpd-core x86_64 2.4.63-1.fc41 updates 4.8 MiB httpd-filesystem noarch 2.4.62-6.fc42 fedora 464.0 B replacing httpd-filesystem noarch 2.4.63-1.fc41 updates 464.0 MiB httpd-tools x86_64 2.4.62-6.fc42 fedora 214.8 KiB replacing httpd-tools x86_64 2.4.63-1.fc41 updates 215.8 KiB mbedtls x86_64 2.28.8-1.fc41 fedora 1.1 MiB replacing mbedtlsx86_64 2.28.9-1.fc41 anaconda 1.1 MiB mod_lua x86_64 2.4.62-6.fc42 fedora 137.8 KiB replacing mod_luax86_64 2.4.63-1.fc41 updates 138.1 KiB orca noarch 47.2-2.fc42 fedora 18.1 MiB replacing orca noarch 47.3-1.fc41 updates 18.2 MiB Transaction Summary: Installing:42 packages Upgrading: 2008 packages Replacing: 2029 packages Removing: 5 packages Downgrading: 16 packages -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: COPR custom build script failing
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 04. 03. 25 v 7:29 dop. Peter Hutterer napsal(a): > > Hi all, > > > > This feels like it should be easy but I can't seem to figure it out. > > Two weeks ago my custom build script started failing: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/whot/libinput-git/builds/ > > > > The failing part is... the mockbuild command? > > > Actually the failing part is /usr/bin/su > > > > > Does anyone have any clue what's going on here? Thanks. > > > https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/issues/3631 thanks, much appreciated Cheers, Peter -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora eln compose report: 20250305.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-eln-20250304.n.0 NEW: Fedora-eln-20250305.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 51 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 3.37 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 14.46 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: NetworkManager-1:1.53.1-1.eln146 Old package: NetworkManager-1:1.51.90-1.eln146 Summary: Network connection manager and user applications RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-redhat NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel NetworkManager-ovs NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-tui NetworkManager-wifi NetworkManager-wwan Size: 22.51 MiB Size change: -75.20 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 04 2025 igo Huguet - 1:1.53.1-1 - Update to 1.53.1 release (development) Package: abseil-cpp-20250127.0-1.eln146 Old package: abseil-cpp-20240722.1-1.eln145 Summary: C++ Common Libraries RPMs: abseil-cpp abseil-cpp-devel abseil-cpp-testing Size: 6.85 MiB Size change: 49.25 KiB Changelog: * Tue Feb 04 2025 Benjamin A. Beasley - 20250127.0-1 - Update to 20250127.0 (close RHBZ#2343779) Package: apache-commons-net-3.11.1-10.eln146 Old package: apache-commons-net-3.11.1-9.eln145 Summary: Internet protocol suite Java library RPMs: apache-commons-net Dropped RPMs: apache-commons-net-javadoc Size: 306.84 KiB Size change: -608.28 KiB Changelog: * Mon Mar 03 2025 Mikolaj Izdebski - 3.11.1-10 - Remove javadoc subpackage Package: bpftrace-0.22.1-2.eln146 Old package: bpftrace-0.22.1-1.eln145 Summary: High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF RPMs: bpftrace Size: 8.44 MiB Size change: 9.84 KiB Changelog: * Thu Feb 13 2025 David Abdurachmanov - 0.22.1-2 - Enable riscv64 Package: byaccj-1.15-37.eln146 Old package: byaccj-1.15-35.eln144 Summary: Parser Generator with Java Extension RPMs: byaccj Size: 229.05 KiB Size change: -1.42 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jan 16 2025 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.15-36 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Mar 04 2025 Mikolaj Izdebski - 1.15-37 - Force ANSI C standard - Resolves: rhbz#2339952 Package: dnsconfd-1.7.2-1.eln146 Old package: dnsconfd-1.4.2-1.eln144 Summary: Local DNS cache configuration daemon RPMs: dnsconfd dnsconfd-selinux dnsconfd-unbound Size: 649.79 KiB Size change: 481.84 KiB Changelog: * Thu Jan 16 2025 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.4.2-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Mar 03 2025 Tomas Korbar - 1.7.2-1 - Rebase to 1.7.2 - Resolves: rhbz#2340084 Package: exfatprogs-1.2.8-1.eln146 Old package: exfatprogs-1.2.7-1.eln146 Summary: Userspace utilities for exFAT filesystems RPMs: exfatprogs Size: 389.31 KiB Size change: 102 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 04 2025 Pavel Reichl - 1.2.8-1 - Update to upstream version - Related: rhbz#2349760 Package: fmt-11.1.4-1.eln146 Old package: fmt-11.1.3-1.eln146 Summary: Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++ RPMs: fmt fmt-devel Size: 916.14 KiB Size change: -281 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 04 2025 Kefu Chai - 11.1.4-1 - Update to version 11.1.4 Package: game-music-emu-0.6.4-1.eln146 Old package: game-music-emu-0.6.3-17.eln145 Summary: Video game music file emulation/playback library RPMs: game-music-emu Size: 685.98 KiB Size change: 53.97 KiB Changelog: * Mon Mar 03 2025 Karel Voln?? 0.6.4-1 - New release 0.6.4 (rhbz#2345943) - Updated repository location (rhbz#2247599) Package: gdal-3.10.2-5.eln146 Old package: gdal-3.10.2-3.eln146 Summary: GIS file format library RPMs: gdal-libs Size: 18.80 MiB Size change: -80.25 KiB Changelog: * Wed Feb 26 2025 Sandro Mani - 3.10.2-4 - Rebuild (poppler) * Thu Feb 27 2025 Lauren??iu Nicola - 3.10.2-5 - Enable blosc Package: google-noto-fonts-20250301-1.eln146 Old package: google-noto-fonts-20250201-1.eln146 Summary: Hinted and Non Hinted OpenType fonts for Unicode scripts RPMs: google-noto-fangsong-kss-rotated-fonts google-noto-fangsong-kss-vertical-fonts google-noto-fonts-all google-noto-fonts-common google-noto-kufi-arabic-fonts google-noto-kufi-arabic-vf-fonts google-noto-music-fonts google-noto-naskh-arabic-fonts google-noto-naskh-arabic-ui-fonts google-noto-naskh-arabic-ui-vf-fonts google-noto-naskh-arabic-vf-fonts google-noto-nastaliq-urdu
Re: License change: scummvm/scummvm-tools
On Tuesday, 04 March 2025 at 23:55, Christian Krause wrote: > Hi, > > scummvm-2.9.0: > - added: BSL-1.0 > - now: > License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND > LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and > LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and ISC and Catharon AND Apache-2.0 AND > BSL-1.0 > > scummvm-tools-2.9.0 > - added: BSD-2-Clause > - now: > License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND > LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and BSD-2-Clause > > I'm aware that the remaining LicenseRef-Callaway entries need to be > resolved. Any help would be highly appreciated! The bundled Adventure Games Studio (ags) engine code is under: Artistic-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Fedora-UltraPermissive AND FTL AND MPEG-SSG AND Apache-2.0 AND MIT-Khronos-old AND Zlib AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause AND CC0-1.0 AND Giftware Note that this doesn't cover its bundled FreeType (FTL) or mojoAL (Zlib), because these are unbundled in the Fedora package. The expression before review was: Artistic-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD and Giftware AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND LicenseRef-Callaway-Public-Domain AND Zlib I did a license review recently. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
License change: ags
Hi! I did a license review of the ags package (to get rid of the LicenseRef-* tags) and arrived at this new SPDX expression for the ags package: Artistic-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Fedora-UltraPermissive AND FTL AND MPEG-SSG AND Apache-2.0 AND MIT-Khronos-old AND Zlib AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause AND CC0-1.0 AND Giftware Previous expression: Artistic-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD and Giftware AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND LicenseRef-Callaway-Public-Domain AND Zlib Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Is there a “Fedora Switzerland/Zürich”? Local Meetups or else
Fedora people in Switzerland might be interested in this: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/is-there-a-fedora-switzerland-zurich/116840/5 The idea is inspired by the UK, in which we evolved to the UK SIG with its occasional meetups and regular exchange among its members, both locally and online in its dedicated channels. Let's find out if there is a "Fedora Switzerland" :) Best, Chris -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 42 compose report: 20250304.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-42-20250303.n.0 NEW: Fedora-42-20250304.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 72 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 122.03 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 687.54 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 551.09 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Scientific_KDE live aarch64 Path: Labs/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-42-20250304.n.0.aarch64.iso Image: i3 live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-42-20250304.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Scientific vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-42-20250303.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: Scientific vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-42-20250303.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: pypy3.11-7.3.19-2.3.11.fc42 Summary: Python 3.11 implementation with a Just-In-Time compiler RPMs:pypy3.11 pypy3.11-devel pypy3.11-libs pypy3.11-test Size:122.03 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: applet-window-buttons-0.12.0^20240405.3263828-4.fc42 Old package: applet-window-buttons-0.12.0^20240405.3263828-3.fc42 Summary: Plasma 6 applet to show window buttons in panels RPMs: applet-window-buttons Size: 522.84 KiB Size change: 40.54 KiB Changelog: * Thu Feb 27 2025 Steve Cossette - 0.12.0^20240405.3263828-4 - Rebuild for kdecoration soname bump Package: bluedevil-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: bluedevil-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Bluetooth stack for KDE RPMs: bluedevil Size: 3.40 MiB Size change: 77 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: breeze-gtk-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: breeze-gtk-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Breeze widget theme for GTK RPMs: breeze-gtk breeze-gtk-common breeze-gtk-gtk2 breeze-gtk-gtk3 breeze-gtk-gtk4 Size: 403.63 KiB Size change: -374 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: flatpak-kcm-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: flatpak-kcm-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Flatpak Permissions Management KCM RPMs: flatpak-kcm Size: 910.09 KiB Size change: -63 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: grub2-breeze-theme-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: grub2-breeze-theme-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Breeze theme for GRUB RPMs: grub2-breeze-theme Size: 4.67 MiB Size change: -54 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kactivitymanagerd-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kactivitymanagerd-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Plasma service to manage user's activities RPMs: kactivitymanagerd Size: 1.51 MiB Size change: 205 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kcm_wacomtablet-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kcm_wacomtablet-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: KDE Control module for Wacom Graphictablets RPMs: kcm_wacomtablet Size: 3.70 MiB Size change: -172 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kde-cli-tools-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kde-cli-tools-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Tools based on KDE Frameworks 5 to better interact with the system RPMs: kde-cli-tools kdesu Size: 5.46 MiB Size change: -509 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kde-gtk-config-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kde-gtk-config-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Configure the appearance of GTK apps in KDE RPMs: kde-gtk-config Size: 670.86 KiB Size change: -58 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kdecoration-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kdecoration-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: A plugin-based library to create window decorations RPMs: kdecoration kdecoration-devel Size: 780.65 KiB Size change: 6.01 KiB Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kdeplasma-addons-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kdeplasma-addons-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Additional Plasmoids for Plasma 6 RPMs: kate-krunner-plugin kdeplasma-addons kdeplasma-addons-devel Size: 10.02 MiB Size change: -3.23 KiB Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kgamma-1:6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kgamma-1:6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: A monitor calibration tool RPMs: kgamma Size: 1.06 MiB Size change: -78 B Changelog: * Tue Feb 25 2025 Steve Cossette - 1:6.3.2-1 - 6.3.2 Package: kglobalacceld-6.3.2-1.fc42 Old package: kglobalacceld-6.3.1-1.fc42 Summary: Daemon providing Global Keyboard Shortcut functionality
Re: COPR custom build script failing
Dne 04. 03. 25 v 7:29 dop. Peter Hutterer napsal(a): Hi all, This feels like it should be easy but I can't seem to figure it out. Two weeks ago my custom build script started failing: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/whot/libinput-git/builds/ The failing part is... the mockbuild command? Actually the failing part is /usr/bin/su Does anyone have any clue what's going on here? Thanks. https://github.com/fedora-copr/copr/issues/3631 -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
here is mine: no problem found here only protonvpn repo not available for fedora 42 and mysql-connector-odbc [sudo] password for hhlp: Updating and loading repositories: keybase 100% | 36.8 KiB/s | 3.5 KiB | 00m00s Hashicorp Stable - x86_64 ???% | 576.0 B/s | 314.0 B | 00m01s >>> Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https >>> Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https >>> Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https >>> Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried Fedora 42 - x86_64 - VirtualBox 100% | 13.0 KiB/s | 27.6 KiB | 00m02s >>> Status code: 404 for http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox >>> Status code: 404 for http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox >>> Status code: 404 for http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox >>> Status code: 404 for http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried Docker CE Stable - x86_64 100% | 2.2 KiB/s | 1.5 KiB | 00m01s >>> Status code: 404 for https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ >>> Status code: 404 for https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ >>> Status code: 404 for https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ >>> Status code: 404 for https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried MySQL Connectors Community 100% | 59.0 B/s | 40.0 B | 00m01s >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried ProtonVPN Fedora Stable repository ???% | 493.0 B/s | 153.0 B | 00m00s >>> Status code: 404 for https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- >>> Status code: 404 for https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- >>> Status code: 404 for https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- >>> Status code: 404 for https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried MySQL Tools Community 100% | 67.0 B/s | 40.0 B | 00m01s >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-tools-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo.mysq >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-tools-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo.mysq >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-tools-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo.mysq >>> Status code: 404 for http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-tools-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo.mysq >>> Librepo error
Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2025-03-04)
Meeting summary --- * TOPIC: Init Process (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:00:17) * TOPIC: 3347 RFC: Schedule checkpoint for landing major toolchain upgrades (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:04:45) * TOPIC: Proposal: Major toolchain upgrades must land at least 7 days before the scheduled start of the mass rebuild. (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:07:09) * AGREED: APPROVED(5,0,0) (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:16:48) * ACTION: Aoife Moloney will add the new milestone to the F42 key tasks schedule (@conan_kudo:matrix.org, 17:17:51) * ACTION: Aoife Moloney will add the new milestone to the F43 key tasks schedule (@conan_kudo:matrix.org, 17:18:06) * TOPIC: 3332 Incompatible update policy violations wrt libgit2-1.9.0 updates (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:18:23) * TOPIC: Proposal: Changes to packaging that maintain compatibility can happen at any time, though it is recommended to avoid bigger changes in stable releases. Advance notification is not required when no changes or rebuilds in dependent packages are necessary. When considering compatibility, maintainers must take all into account all the ways that packages are used, i.e. not just rpm builds, but also ostree and flatpaks deployments. (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:26:12) * AGREED: APPROVED (5,0,0) (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:30:00) * TOPIC: Next week's chair (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:33:52) * ACTION: Fale will chair next meeting (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:34:05) * TOPIC: Open Floor (@humaton:fedora.im, 17:34:16) Meeting ended at 2025-03-04 17:37:24 Action items * Aoife Moloney will add the new milestone to the F43 key tasks schedule * Fale will chair next meeting People Present (lines said) --- * @humaton:fedora.im (37) * @decathorpe:fedora.im (24) * @conan_kudo:matrix.org (20) * @zbyszek:fedora.im (15) * @zodbot:fedora.im (13) * @nirik:matrix.scrye.com (11) * @meetbot:fedora.im (3) Link to the meeting logs https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-04/fesco.2025-03-04-17.00.log.html https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org//meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2025-03-04/fesco.2025-03-04-17.00.log.txt Since there was no agenda email this week here are the announcements. = Discussed and Voted in the Ticket = [FastTrack] Rebase grub2 in F40 to 2.12 for CVE fixes https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3368 APPROVED(+7,0,0) Change: Retire python-nose https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3366 APPROVED(+5,0,0) Change: Remove el, jsp and servlet packages from tomcat https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3365 APPROVED(+5,0,0) publickey - jednorozec@protonmail.com - 0x58DA9885.asc Description: application/pgp-keys publickey - jednorozec@radioypsilon.eu - 0x8E713EA4.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Multiple kernels
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 8:16 AM Justin Forbes wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 7:54 PM Benson Muite > wrote: > > > > > > Fedora has a policy to support only one kernel. Projects such as > > OpenHarmony support multiple kernels to enable reuse of components on > > devices with a wide range of compute capabilities - in particular mobile > > and edge devices. Is this something Fedora would consider doing? This > > would potentially benefit spins aimed for mobile and desktop use. > > So, the concept of flavors exists, and there is a possibility that we > could enable some additional flavors at some point. I know I have > been asked about rt kernels, 64K page size kernels for aarch64, etc. > The biggest problem we run into is the way that koji works.Each > arch is serialized, meaning if we add another flavor of aarch64, it > will double the build time for aarch64 kernels. Because Fedora is > completely open, I have no way to "stage" builds for things like > embargoed CVEs. This means that I can't commit the fix and start the > build until said CVE is public. As a result, each additional flavor > would have a significant impact on how quickly we can get critical CVE > fixes out to users. This is one of the main reasons that I am very > careful about additional flavors. I did float a proposal about > parallelizing builds which might make this less of an issue, though it > still wouldn't completely open flood gates. Fedora is only going to > support additional flavors officially if there are actual users and > testers to ensure that it is both worth the effort, and can maintain > some semblance of quality. > This isn't about flavors though, since flavors are all built from the same singular source package. This is about having separate source packages for different kernel trees that build installable and bootable kernels. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:26 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the > actual upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the > appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > next Fedora. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages > first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already lots of "Fails to install" (F42FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2300529&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=__open__&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cbug_severity&list_id=13558325&order=id%2C%20&query_format=advanced > > > For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines on renaming > and replacing packages: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages > > > I myself discovered one issue with workrave and kf5-kitinerary and > reported them. > > Thank you > Miroslav > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > On my x86_64: Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-39.fc38.x86_64 requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed - xml-commons-apis-1.4.01-47.fc41.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package Problem 2: installed package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 - java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: problem with installed package - installed package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed - java-17-openjdk-headless-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository My aarch64 and ppc64le servers had no transaction issues. -- Regards, Charalampos Stratakis Senior Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
I had the hsakmt-devel problem too, so I opened https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-runtime/pull-request/11. On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 2:54 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote: > On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and >> try to run: >> >> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best >> distro-sync >> > > > dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best > distro-sync > Updating and loading repositories: > Fedora 42 - x86_64 - Updates > 100% | 76.4 KiB/s | 31.5 KiB | 00m00s > Copr repo for PyCharm owned by phracek > 100% | 5.4 KiB/s | 4.1 KiB | 00m01s > Fedora 42 - x86_64 > 100% | 2.6 MiB/s | 35.2 MiB | 00m14s > RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree - Steam > 100% | 14.3 KiB/s | 11.5 KiB | 00m01s > RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver > 100% | 3.8 MiB/s | 3.1 MiB | 00m01s > Fedora 42 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 > 100% | 9.3 KiB/s | 6.0 KiB | 00m01s > Repositories loaded. > Failed to resolve the transaction: > Problem 1: installed package emacs-terminal-1:29.4-43.fc41.noarch > requires emacs = 1:29.4-43.fc41, but none of the providers can be > installed > - emacs-1:29.4-43.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package > Problem 2: installed package > hsakmt-devel-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 requires > libhsakmt.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - installed package hsakmt-devel-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 > requires hsakmt(x86-64) = 1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41, but none of the > providers can be installed > - hsakmt-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package > You can try to add to command line: > --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages > > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
I only found one issue and that is just due to me not using RPM fusion Repo for nvidia drivers instead depending on negativo17s Nvidia drivers Repositories loaded. Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem: installed package nvidia-driver-cuda-3:570.124.04-1.fc41.x86_64 requires nvidia-persistenced = 3:570.124.04, but none of the providers can be installed - nvidia-persistenced-3:570.124.04-1.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package You can try to add to command line: --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages Regards Vaishnav R On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 21:57, H H L P wrote: > here is mine: > > no problem found here only protonvpn repo not available for fedora 42 and > mysql-connector-odbc > > [sudo] password for hhlp: > Updating and loading repositories: > keybase > 100% | 36.8 KiB/s | 3.5 KiB | 00m00s > Hashicorp Stable - > x86_64 > ???% | 576.0 B/s | 314.0 B | 00m01s > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:2042:3600:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) - https > >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download > repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were > tried > Fedora 42 - x86_64 - > VirtualBox > 100% | 13.0 KiB/s | 27.6 KiB | 00m02s > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://download.virtualbox.org/virtualbox/rpm/fedora/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2.22.220.153) - http://download.virtualbox > >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download > repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were > tried > Docker CE Stable - > x86_64 > 100% | 2.2 KiB/s | 1.5 KiB | 00m01s > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://download.docker.com/linux/fedora/42/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2600:9000:267e:5800:3:db06:4200:93a1) - https:/ > >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download > repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were > tried > MySQL Connectors > Community > 100% | 59.0 B/s | 40.0 B | 00m01s > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo > >>> Status code: 404 for > http://repo.mysql.com/yum/mysql-connectors-community/fc/42/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml > (IP: 2a02:26f0:5c00:284::1d68) - http://repo > >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download > repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were > tried > ProtonVPN Fedora Stable > repository > ???% | 493.0 B/s | 153.0 B | 00m00s > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: > 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: > 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: > 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- > >>> Status code: 404 for > https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora-42-stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: > 2606:4700:20::ac43:4672) - https://repo.protonvpn.com/fedora- > >>> Librepo error: Cannot download repo
Re: SONAME BUMP openh264
The new noopenh264 is now available in the side tag. Packagers, please start your builds! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync Updating and loading repositories: Fedora 42 - x86_64 - Updates 100% | 76.4 KiB/s | 31.5 KiB | 00m00s Copr repo for PyCharm owned by phracek 100% | 5.4 KiB/s | 4.1 KiB | 00m01s Fedora 42 - x86_64 100% | 2.6 MiB/s | 35.2 MiB | 00m14s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree - Steam 100% | 14.3 KiB/s | 11.5 KiB | 00m01s RPM Fusion for Fedora 42 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver 100% | 3.8 MiB/s | 3.1 MiB | 00m01s Fedora 42 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 100% | 9.3 KiB/s | 6.0 KiB | 00m01s Repositories loaded. Failed to resolve the transaction: Problem 1: installed package emacs-terminal-1:29.4-43.fc41.noarch requires emacs = 1:29.4-43.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed - emacs-1:29.4-43.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package Problem 2: installed package hsakmt-devel-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 requires libhsakmt.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - installed package hsakmt-devel-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 requires hsakmt(x86-64) = 1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed - hsakmt-1.0.6-46.rocm6.2.1.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package You can try to add to command line: --skip-broken to skip uninstallable packages -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F41 to F42
no issues here Intel (RKL, 11 th. Gen.), running Gnome and Xorg -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
