Re: libnfs soname bump

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 11:51:47PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Le 2025-02-18 15:38, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :
> >On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
> >>
> >>Affected packages are:
> >>gvfs
> >>qemu
> >>vlc
> >>xine-lib
> >>kodi (RPM Fusion)
> >>mpd (RPM Fusion)
> >
> >... and this bug:
> >
> >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331668
> >
> >Hi Xavier,
> >
> >I was just looking at the qemu situation again, and was wondering if
> >there's been any update on this since January?
> >
> >I noticed that on Friday last week you did another build of libnfs-6
> >into the side tag, but the (Rawhide) side tag now only contains two
> >packages:
> >
> >https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=105744&order=-build_id&latest=1
> >
> >So do we need to do qemu again?  Is anything else blocking this?
> >
> >My (only personal) opinion is we've spent a few months on this
> >already, and we should just update libnfs in Rawhide and packages that
> >haven't been updated yet should just have to deal with the
> >consequences.  They've had enough time to either fix their code or
> >remove the dependency.  But I appreciate that may cause pain ...
> >
> >Rich.
> 
> Hi Rich and all,
> 
> I just fixed another issue with xine-lib and now all 4 Fedora
> packages have been rebuilt in their respective side tag.
> 
> $ koji list-tagged f42-build-side-104263
> Build Tag   Built by
>   
> 
> gvfs-1.56.1-6.fc42f42-build-side-104263  oholy
> libnfs-6.0.2-2.fc42   f42-build-side-104263  releng
> qemu-9.2.0-20.fc42f42-build-side-104263
> berrange
> xine-lib-1.2.13-21.fc42   f42-build-side-104263  xavierb
> 
> $ koji list-tagged f43-build-side-105744
> Build Tag   Built by
>   
> 
> gvfs-1.56.1-6.fc43f43-build-side-105744  oholy
> libnfs-6.0.2-2.fc43   f43-build-side-105744  xavierb
> qemu-9.2.0-23.fc43f43-build-side-105744
> berrange
> xine-lib-1.2.13-21.fc43   f43-build-side-105744  xavierb
> 
> I have not heard of the maintainers of the 2 RPM Fusion packages,
> I'll look at this next.
> Anyway, the side tags are ready to be merged as far as Fedora is
> concerned, so I'll do that soon.
> 
> Sorry it took so long to get everything in line.

That's great news, thanks Xavier.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW

-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20250127.0 coming to F43/Rawhide

[Ben Beasley]

In one week, 2025-02-25, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp 
from 20240722.1 to 20250127.0 (Abseil LTS branch, January 2025)[1] in 
side tags for F43/Rawhide. Like all new calendar versions of abseil-cpp, 
this breaks ABI compatibility and bumps the SONAME version[2].


Testing in COPR[3] indicates all directly-dependent packages are 
compatible, with a few PR’s mentioned later in this message. It’s also 
still possible to ship this update in F42/Branched at this point in the 
release cycle, but I don’t currently plan to do so. (The release notes 
didn’t provide much motivation.)


Besides abseil-cpp, I plan to rebuild all dependent packages using 
maintainer/co-maintainer or provenpackager privileges. These packages are:


    - bloaty
    - buildbox
    - credentials-fetcher
    - CuraEngine_grpc_definitions
    - fastnetmon
    - fcitx5-mozc
    - frr
    - grpc
    - ilbc
    - libarrow
    - libphonenumber
    - mozc
    - onnxruntime
    - parlaylib
    - plasma-dialer
    - re2
    - syslog-ng
    - webrtc-audio-processing

In order to do so, I will need to merge these three PR’s, although I am 
happy to accept feedback or alternative proposals in the coming week:


    - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/onnxruntime/pull-request/9
    - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mozc/pull-request/7
    - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fcitx5-mozc/pull-request/6

It looks like webrtc-audio-processing only ends up using "header-only" 
parts of the abseil-cpp API, and doesn’t currently link any abseil-cpp 
shared libraries; still, including it in the list above does no harm and 
might do some good.


Finally, it looks like marble has a legitimate direct BuildRequires on 
abseil-cpp-devel (in that the build system checks for it), but none of 
the headers are included and none of the binary packages ends up linking 
abseil-cpp libraries, so I see no reason to rebuild marble.


Maintainers of all affected packages should have received this email 
directly (by BCC rather than CC, to keep the message from being held for 
moderation due to a long CC list).


If you want to handle the rebuild of one of the packages in the above 
list yourself, or if you have other questions or concerns, please just 
let me know before 2025-02-25.


While looking for reverse dependencies, I identified two packages that 
had BuildRequires on abseil-cpp-devel but did not actually use it 
directly, and whose binary packages did not depend on abseil-cpp. I 
opened PR’s to remove these BuildRequires, but these don’t need to be 
merged as part of the update or with any particular urgency.


    - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/parlaylib/pull-request/1
    - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/spacebar/pull-request/4

– Ben Beasley (FAS: music)


[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/abseil-cpp/pull-request/26

[2] https://github.com/abseil/abseil-cpp/releases/tag/20250127.0

[3] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/music/abseil-cpp/packages/

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: libnfs soname bump

[Xavier Bachelot via devel]

Le 2025-02-18 23:51, Xavier Bachelot a écrit :
I have not heard of the maintainers of the 2 RPM Fusion packages, I'll 
look at this next.
Anyway, the side tags are ready to be merged as far as Fedora is 
concerned, so I'll do that soon.



Both mpd and kodi have a fix :
- https://github.com/MusicPlayerDaemon/MPD/pull/2198
- https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/pull/26110

Regards,
Xavier
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: libnfs soname bump

[Xavier Bachelot via devel]

Le 2025-02-18 15:38, Richard W.M. Jones a écrit :

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:

Hi,

libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.

Affected packages are:
gvfs
qemu
vlc
xine-lib
kodi (RPM Fusion)
mpd (RPM Fusion)


... and this bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331668

Hi Xavier,

I was just looking at the qemu situation again, and was wondering if
there's been any update on this since January?

I noticed that on Friday last week you did another build of libnfs-6
into the side tag, but the (Rawhide) side tag now only contains two
packages:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=105744&order=-build_id&latest=1

So do we need to do qemu again?  Is anything else blocking this?

My (only personal) opinion is we've spent a few months on this
already, and we should just update libnfs in Rawhide and packages that
haven't been updated yet should just have to deal with the
consequences.  They've had enough time to either fix their code or
remove the dependency.  But I appreciate that may cause pain ...

Rich.


Hi Rich and all,

I just fixed another issue with xine-lib and now all 4 Fedora packages 
have been rebuilt in their respective side tag.


$ koji list-tagged f42-build-side-104263
Build Tag   Built by
    


gvfs-1.56.1-6.fc42f42-build-side-104263  oholy
libnfs-6.0.2-2.fc42   f42-build-side-104263  releng
qemu-9.2.0-20.fc42f42-build-side-104263  
berrange

xine-lib-1.2.13-21.fc42   f42-build-side-104263  xavierb

$ koji list-tagged f43-build-side-105744
Build Tag   Built by
    


gvfs-1.56.1-6.fc43f43-build-side-105744  oholy
libnfs-6.0.2-2.fc43   f43-build-side-105744  xavierb
qemu-9.2.0-23.fc43f43-build-side-105744  
berrange

xine-lib-1.2.13-21.fc43   f43-build-side-105744  xavierb

I have not heard of the maintainers of the 2 RPM Fusion packages, I'll 
look at this next.
Anyway, the side tags are ready to be merged as far as Fedora is 
concerned, so I'll do that soon.


Sorry it took so long to get everything in line.

Regards,
Xavier
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora eln compose report: 20250219.n.0 changes

[Fedora ELN Report]

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250218.n.2
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250219.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   65
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   1.03 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   26.27 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  PyQt-builder-1.18.0-1.eln146
Old package:  PyQt-builder-1.17.2-1.eln145
Summary:  The PEP 517 compliant PyQt build system
RPMs: PyQt-builder
Size: 119.01 KiB
Size change:  -28 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Feb 19 2025 Scott Talbert  - 1.18.0-1
  - Update to new upstream release 1.18.0 (#2343425)


Package:  bluedevil-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  bluedevil-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Bluetooth stack for KDE
RPMs: bluedevil
Size: 2.02 MiB
Size change:  324 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  breeze-gtk-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  breeze-gtk-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Breeze widget theme for GTK
RPMs: breeze-gtk-common
Size: 315.03 KiB
Size change:  117 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  ceph-2:19.2.1-2.eln146
Old package:  ceph-2:19.2.1-1.eln146
Summary:  User space components of the Ceph file system
RPMs: librados-devel librados2 libradospp-devel librbd-devel librbd1
Size: 27.66 MiB
Size change:  1.12 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY  - 2:19.2.1-2
  - ceph-19.2.1, rebuild with liborc-2.1.0, libarrow-19.0.0


Package:  flatpak-kcm-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  flatpak-kcm-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Flatpak Permissions Management KCM
RPMs: flatpak-kcm
Size: 725.32 KiB
Size change:  1.02 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  glycin-1.1.4-4.eln146
Old package:  glycin-1.1.4-2.eln145
Summary:  Sandboxed image rendering
RPMs: glycin-loaders
Size: 6.83 MiB
Size change:  4.73 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 03 2025 Robert-Andr?? Mauchin  - 1.1.4-3
  - Bump jpegxl-rs / jpegxl-sys dependencies from 0.10 to 0.11

  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Fabio Valentini  - 1.1.4-4
  - Correctly apply patches depending on use of vendored sources


Package:  ibus-1.5.32~beta2-3.eln146
Old package:  ibus-1.5.32~beta2-2.eln146
Summary:  Intelligent Input Bus for Linux OS
RPMs: ibus ibus-devel ibus-devel-docs ibus-gtk3 ibus-gtk4 ibus-libs 
ibus-panel ibus-setup ibus-wayland
Size: 61.37 MiB
Size change:  6.12 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Feb 19 2025 Takao Fujiwara  - 1.5.32~beta2-3
  - Fix SEGV in Xorg without IBusWaylandIM
  - Update ibus_panel_condition for Wayland desktops


Package:  iniparser-4.2.6-1.eln146
Old package:  iniparser-4.2.5-2.eln145
Summary:  C library for parsing "INI-style" files
RPMs: iniparser
Size: 106.68 KiB
Size change:  361 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 David Cantrell  - 4.2.6-1
  - Upgrade to iniparser-4.2.6 (#2345965)
  - Upstream moved to gitlab.com


Package:  kactivitymanagerd-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  kactivitymanagerd-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Plasma service to manage user's activities
RPMs: kactivitymanagerd
Size: 1.20 MiB
Size change:  87 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  kde-cli-tools-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  kde-cli-tools-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Tools based on KDE Frameworks 5 to better interact with the system
RPMs: kde-cli-tools kdesu
Size: 4.57 MiB
Size change:  -614 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  kde-gtk-config-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  kde-gtk-config-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Configure the appearance of GTK apps in KDE
RPMs: kde-gtk-config
Size: 532.20 KiB
Size change:  -46 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  kdecoration-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  kdecoration-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  A plugin-based library to create window decorations
RPMs: kdecoration
Size: 473.79 KiB
Size change:  -6 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  kdeplasma-addons-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  kdeplasma-addons-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Additional Plasmoids for Plasma 6
RPMs: kdeplasma-addons
Size: 7.79 MiB
Size change:  68.81 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Steve Cossette  - 6.3.1-1
  - 6.3.1


Package:  kglobalacceld-6.3.1-1.eln146
Old package:  kglobalacceld-6.3.0-1.eln146
Summary:  Daemon providing Global Keyboard Shortcut functionality
RPMs: kglobalacceld
Size: 601.56 

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

[Ben Beasley]

I gather that you have already found that this will work for the 
import-only "smoke test":


    # Make sure everything is at least importable. Skip
    # inputremapper.bin.input_remapper_gtk because it requires a display.
    %pyproject_check_import -e inputremapper.bin.input_remapper_gtk

I spent a little time attempting an update to input-remapper 2.1.1 
locally. I think that errors like


    _ ERROR at setup of test_setup 
_
    file 
/builddir/build/BUILD/input-remapper-2.1.1-build/input-remapper-2.1.1/tests/lib/test_setup.py, 
line 33

      def test_setup(cls):
    E   fixture 'cls' not found
    >   available fixtures: cache, capfd, capfdbinary, caplog, 
capsys, capsysbinary, doctest_namespace, monkeypatch, pytestconfig,    
record_property, record_testsuite_property, record_xml_attribute, recwarn,

tmp_path, tmp_path_factory, tmpdir, tmpdir_factory
    >   use 'pytest --fixtures [testpath]' for help on them.

/builddir/build/BUILD/input-remapper-2.1.1-build/input-remapper-2.1.1/tests/lib/test_setup.py:33

suggest upstream has accidentally made the tests incompatible with 
pytest as a runner, because test_setup looks like pytest's "magic 
syntax" for a test with a fixture. That’s unfortunate, because using 
pytest as the test runner allowed us to skip known failing tests easily 
by adding command-line options, while skipping an individual test with 
unittest requires patching the test source to add a decorator.


Still, I thought it was worth trying to run the tests closer to the way 
upstream does in .github/workflows/test.yml.


    %{py3_test_envvars} %{python3} -m unittest discover tests/unit

Unfortunately, I still see a wall of errors like

==
    ERROR: test_autoload (test_config.TestConfig.test_autoload)
--
    Traceback (most recent call last):
      File 
"/builddir/build/BUILD/input-remapper-2.1.1-build/input-remapper-2.1.1/tests/lib/test_setup.py", 
line 79, in setUp

        patch.start()
    ~~~^^
      File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/unittest/mock.py", line 1652, in start
    result = self.__enter__()
      File "/usr/lib64/python3.13/unittest/mock.py", line 1474, in 
__enter__

    raise RuntimeError("Patch is already started")
    RuntimeError: Patch is already started

I really don’t have any immediate insight into why that is happening.

It’s a shame to disable the tests altogether, because this package has 
extensive test coverage and they serve as a very useful early warning of 
incompatibilities with new Python interpreter versions, system 
libraries, and so on. However, running tests is a "should," not a "must" 
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_tests), 
and it looks like the difficulty of getting them working in the current 
release is high enough that simply omitting the tests would be 
justifiable. You’ll want to maintain the %pyproject_check_import "smoke 
test," of course.


- Ben Beasley (FAS: music)

On 2/17/25 7:55 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:

Thank you all very much for your input.

A long time ago I had needed to run some graphical tests in %check and
I vaguely remember using some dummy driver which was then
superseded(?) by xvfb and then for some reason I stopped needing to
care about all that and that cache in my brain got flushed. Thanks for
putting that info back.

Thinking it was the easiest option, I decided to go with Karolina's
suggestion and skip the offending module, which sure enough, allowed
the tests to proceed and lead to a wall of failures:

= 475 failed, 12 passed, 4 deselected, 4 warnings, 112 errors in
146.02s (0:02:26) =

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=129355209

I was hoping that Ben, who authored the pytest part of the spec file,
would be able to shed some light as to what is going on, though I
suspect I need to get in touch with upstream. I can't make heads or
tails of anything. Why does test_autoload fail? What should the "Patch
is already started" error message mean to me?

I know our guidelines about unit tests and I can see the point in
upstream having them in place, but do we as a downstream distribution
need to run all of these? It's not like a math library, that might
produce different results on different architectures, this program
either works or it doesn't. 500 tests that ultimately tell us nothing
about the state of the program once it is installed seem like an
overkill.

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@li

RE: Packaging Radeon ProRender addon for Blender

[Rix, Tom via devel]

[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]

I am unable to follow the COPR link to the package, can you send them to me 
directly ?
I am more familiar with ROCm than the rendering side of AMD products but would 
like to help.
Tom


From: Luya Tshimbalanga 
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2025 2:47 PM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora 
Cc: Rix, Tom 
Subject: Packaging Radeon ProRender addon for Blender


Hello team,

I stumble in Radeon ProRender engine [1] and attempt to package it following 
the python guideline:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/designsuite/blender/build/8665473/

It seems an alternative to both Blender Cycles engine (has issue for AMD GCN 
architecture with newer ROCm release) and Lux Render supporting all videocards 
hardware. Could someone give a point how
to properly packaging it please as addon for Blender?

Thank you.



Reference:
---

[1] https://gpuopen.com/radeon-prorender-suite/#prorender

--

Luya Tshimbalanga

Fedora Design Team

Fedora Design Suite maintainer
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Packaging Radeon ProRender addon for Blender

[Luya Tshimbalanga]

Here is the spec file of Radeon ProRender addon for Blender 3D:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@designsuite/blender/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/08665473-python-blender-radeon-prorender-addon/python-blender-radeon-prorender-addon.spec

On 2025-02-18 05:10, Rix, Tom wrote:


[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]


I am unable to follow the COPR link to the package, can you send them 
to me directly ?


I am more familiar with ROCm than the rendering side of AMD products 
but would like to help.


Tom

*From:*Luya Tshimbalanga 
*Sent:* Monday, February 17, 2025 2:47 PM
*To:* Development discussions related to Fedora 


*Cc:* Rix, Tom 
*Subject:* Packaging Radeon ProRender addon for Blender

Hello team,

I stumble in Radeon ProRender engine [1] and attempt to package it 
following the python guideline:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/designsuite/blender/build/8665473/

It seems an alternative to both Blender Cycles engine (has issue for 
AMD GCN architecture with newer ROCm release) and Lux Render 
supporting all videocards hardware. Could someone give a point how

to properly packaging it please as addon for Blender?

Thank you.

Reference:
---

[1] https://gpuopen.com/radeon-prorender-suite/#prorender

--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer


--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Inactive Packagers Policy for the F42 cycle

[Mattia Verga via devel]

In accordance with FESCo's Inactive Packager Policy[1], packagers that have 
been identified as inactive have a ticket
in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the final release, 
packagers who remain inactive will be removed
from the packager group. (Note that pagure.io is one of the systems checked for 
activity, so commenting on your ticket
that you're still around will prevent you from showing up in the second round.)

If you have suggestions for improvement, look for the open feature issues[3] 
and file an issue in the
find-inactive-packagers repo[4] if it's not there already.

For the curious, here are the stats from today's run:

### Found 1486 users in the packager group. ###
### Found 635 users with no builds in Koji over the last year. ###
### Found 305 users with no activity in pagure/src.fp.org over the last year. 
###
### Found 288 users which didn't post any message in Fedora Discussion over the 
last year. ###
### Found 252 users which also show no activity in Bodhi over the last year. ###
### Found 226 users which also show no activity in mailing lists over the last 
year. ###
### Found 160 users which also show no activity in Bugzilla over the last year. 
###

[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
[2]
https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issues?tags=inactive_packager&status=Open
[3]
https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issues?tags=feature
[4]
https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/new_issue
Here it's the full list of users detected as inactive:
acui
adobes
affix
aglitke
airwave
ajmitchell
akasko
alexlan
alissonbruno
alphacc
als
arnd
arozansk
aruiz
astepano
bcornec
beldmit
benesv
bilelmoussaoui
brendt
brenton
brouhaha
bskeggs
chedi
chrissie
cn137
cooperlees
dachary
damien-lemoal
dang
davanum
davem
davidx
dcbw
deekej
dhat180
diaasami
djuran
dlehman
dmurphy18
dprince
dwysocha
edward-evans-aiven
ellio167
fenris02
fsimonce
gholms
gtiwari
hanoglu
hguemar
hushan
hvad
ib54003
icon
idiez
ikedas
imullins
irina
jbenc
jfsaucier
jkaluza
jlanda
jmarcin
jmoyer
joev
jolsa
jpechane
jsafrane
jschmidb
juergh
kanitha
kasong
kc8hfi
ksiddiqu
kumarpraveen
labbott
law
laxathom
lchilton
lkiesow
lucab
lucarval
lucilanga
luigifab
lulinqing
lupinix
major
malmond
mangelajo
markuss
martstyk
matwey
mcascella
mcbeeffx
mdcornu
mhough
michaelanguskelly
mkosek
mprivozn
msk61
murphyp
nickboldt
nim
niohiani
nkondras
nyoxi
pbabinca
pcolby
phuzion
pidgornyy
plfiorini
pmyers
poros
psalaba
puiterwijk
quintela
ralphlange
ravindrakumar
rerickso
reznik
rlescak
rpeterso
rrendec
saakla
scoady
sdyroff
sfroemer
shoracek
siddharths
siddharthvipul1
sinnykumari
snecker
snirkel
spotlesstofu
stbenjam
szidek
terrycloth
thoger
tlavocat
torbuntu
toshio
totol
tscherf
u1f35c
van
vgoyal
victortyau
vishalvvr
vmakarov
vponcova
xinghong
yahmad
yashn
yizhengxie
yonhan
yunyings
zaitcev
zaitseff
zkota
zvetlik-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 42 Beta Freeze and Bodhi updates-testing activation point

[Samyak Jain via devel-announce]

Hi all,

Today's an important day on the Fedora Linux 42 schedule [1], with
several significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi
updates-testing activation point [2]. That means that from now all
Fedora Linux 42 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass
the relevant requirements [3] before they will be marked as 'stable'
and moved to the Fedora Repository.

Today is also the Beta freeze [4]. This means that only packages which
fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [5][6] will be marked as
'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds will remain
in updates-testing until the Beta release is approved, at which point
the Beta freeze is lifted and packages can move to 'stable' as usual
until the Final freeze.

Today is also the Software String freeze [7], which means that strings
marked for translation in Fedora-translated projects should not now be
changed for Fedora Linux 42. Finally, today is the 'completion
deadline' Change Checkpoint [8], meaning that Fedora Linux 42 Changes
must now be 'feature complete or close enough to completion that a
majority of its functionality can be tested'. All tracking bugs should
be on ON_QA state or later to reflect this.

Regards,
Samyak Jain
Fedora Release Engineering

[1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-42/f-42-key-tasks.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes
[5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process
[6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
[7] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/StringFreezePolicy
[8] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy
-- 
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora eln compose report: 20250218.n.2 changes

[Fedora ELN Report]

OLD: Fedora-eln-20250217.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20250218.n.2

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   53
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:4.48 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   2.81 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   32.19 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: plasma-applet-translator-0.8-11.eln145
Summary: Plasma 5 applet for translate-shell
RPMs:plasma-applet-translator
Size:25.72 KiB

Package: qt5-qtxmlpatterns-5.15.16-2.eln145
Summary: Qt5 - QtXmlPatterns component
RPMs:qt5-qtxmlpatterns
Size:3.84 MiB

Package: rlwrap-0.46.1-9.eln145
Summary: Wrapper for GNU readline
RPMs:rlwrap
Size:569.47 KiB

Package: translate-shell-0.9.7.1-6.eln145
Summary: A command-line online translator
RPMs:translate-shell
Size:65.11 KiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  NetworkManager-1:1.51.90-1.eln146
Old package:  NetworkManager-1:1.51.6-1.eln145
Summary:  Network connection manager and user applications
RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth 
NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-redhat 
NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel 
NetworkManager-ovs NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-tui NetworkManager-wifi 
NetworkManager-wwan
Size: 22.58 MiB
Size change:  7.38 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 10 2025 Beniamino Galvani  - 1.51.7-1
  - Update to 1.51.7 release (development)

  * Mon Feb 17 2025 Beniamino Galvani  - 1.51.90-1
  - Update to 1.52-rc1 release (1.51.90)
  - Fix state handling in the dnsconfd DNS plugin


Package:  anaconda-43.1-1.eln146
Old package:  anaconda-42.26-1.eln146
Summary:  Graphical system installer
RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui 
anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-install-img-deps anaconda-tui 
anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel
Size: 17.32 MiB
Size change:  -16.58 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Packit  - 43.1-1
  - Update to version 43.1


Package:  ant-1.10.15-20.eln146
Old package:  ant-1.10.15-19.eln145
Summary:  Java build tool
RPMs: ant ant-antlr ant-apache-bcel ant-apache-bsf ant-apache-oro 
ant-apache-regexp ant-apache-resolver ant-apache-xalan2 ant-commons-logging 
ant-commons-net ant-imageio ant-jakartamail ant-javadoc ant-jdepend ant-jmf 
ant-jsch ant-junit ant-junit5 ant-lib ant-manual ant-openjdk21 ant-swing 
ant-testutil ant-unbound ant-xz
Size: 5.33 MiB
Size change:  -2.92 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Mikolaj Izdebski  - 1.10.15-20
  - Use %jar macro


Package:  aopalliance-1.0-54.eln146
Old package:  aopalliance-1.0-53.eln145
Summary:  Java/J2EE AOP standards
RPMs: aopalliance aopalliance-javadoc
Size: 130.09 KiB
Size change:  -264 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Mikolaj Izdebski  - 0:1.0-54
  - Use %jar macro


Package:  awscli2-2.24.4-1.eln146
Old package:  awscli2-2.22.33-2.eln145
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS, version 2
RPMs: awscli2
Size: 13.61 MiB
Size change:  99.39 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 03 2025 Packit  - 2.23.11-1
  - Update to 2.23.11 upstream release
  - Resolves: rhbz#2337442

  * Thu Feb 13 2025 Packit  - 2.24.4-1
  - Update to 2.24.4 upstream release
  - Resolves: rhbz#2337442


Package:  exiv2-0.28.4-1.eln146
Old package:  exiv2-0.28.3-2.eln145
Summary:  Exif, IPTC and XMP metadata manipulation library
RPMs: exiv2 exiv2-devel exiv2-doc exiv2-libs
Size: 16.00 MiB
Size change:  -30.66 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Feb 12 2025 Milo?? Komar??evi??  - 0.28.4-1
  - Update to 0.28.4 (rhbz#2296420)


Package:  fedora-release-43-0.4.eln146
Old package:  fedora-release-43-0.2.eln146
Summary:  Fedora release files
RPMs: fedora-release-common fedora-release-eln 
fedora-release-identity-eln
Size: 33.80 KiB
Size change:  -20.91 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Stephen Gallagher  - 43-0.4
  - RPMAUTOSPEC: unresolvable merge


Package:  fedpkg-1.45-9.eln146
Old package:  fedpkg-1.45-3.eln142
Summary:  Fedora utility for working with dist-git
RPMs: fedpkg
Size: 117.06 KiB
Size change:  -1.55 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jul 25 2024 Miroslav Such??  - 1.45-4
  - convert license to SPDX

  * Wed Sep 18 2024 Ond??ej Nosek  - 1.45-5
  - Add py313 environment as that's current
  - Drop support for bodhi-client <= 5
  - Drop all usage of six
  - Replace and update use of deprecated 'linux_distribution'
  - Modernize and clean unittest imports
  - Update check_bodhi_version to check for >= 6.0.0
  - Fix URL of Bodhi in staging
  - Fixes missing key in distro.os_release_info()
  - Do not auto-request ELN 

Re: Rust SIG Spring Cleaning - 2025 Edition

[Fabio Valentini]

On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 2:21 PM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
>
> Otherwise I plan to retire any Rust packages that are
> - library-only / source-only and
> - have been unused leaf packages for 365+ days and
> - have no documented reason for why they are still needed
> before the F42 Beta Freeze takes effect.

I have retired all packages where I could determine that they are
really no longer needed and / or where I was the main maintainer.

I did not touch packages where the reason that they were packaged was
never publicly documented (as far as I can tell):

albertlarsan68: rust-fend-core
dcavalca:   rust-rusttype
leo:rust-colorgrad, rust-enum-display-derive, rust-euclid
salimma:rust-nom-supreme, rust-vec1

Fabio
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [Need help] Issue Authorizing fedpkg push in a Container.

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 08:32:10AM +, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Apologies if I’m sending this to the wrong list.
> 
> I’m facing an issue authorizing fedpkg push inside a container. When I run
> the command, it provides a link for authorization. However, after logging in,
> the link redirects to a localhost address, which is unreachable since I’m
> running the command inside a container.
> 
> I also tried running git push directly, but it always returns "Authentication
> failed," even when I enter the correct password.
> 
> Is there any other way to push my new code to the RPM repository?
> 
> Thanks in advance for your help!

It sounds like you might be trying to do a https push?

When you use fedpkg and specify -a, it will try and get a token to
authenticate you, but to do this it needs you to login on a browser, so
thats why it's redirecting to localhost. :(

I'm not sure how off hand to get this working in a container.
I suppose you could do a push outside the container and copy the token
in? 

kevin
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for ret2libc

[Kevin Fenzi]

(adding maintainer to cc)

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 03:03:10PM +0100, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we are trying to get a rebuild of rizin [1] but the maintainer doesn't react. 
> Same applies to the co-maintainer. I've created a non-responsive maintainer 
> bugzilla ticket at [2].
> 
> 
> Best regards
> 
> 
>   Andreas
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346253
> [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rizin/pull-request/5
> 
> 
> -- 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 42 compose report: 20250218.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-42-20250217.n.0
NEW: Fedora-42-20250218.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  7
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   69
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  13.76 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   2.47 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   123.02 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Cinnamon live x86_64
Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-42-20250218.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Server dvd ppc64le
Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-42-20250217.n.0.iso
Image: Server boot ppc64le
Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-ppc64le-42-20250217.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: glaxnimate-0.5.80-1.fc42
Summary: A simple vector graphics animation program
RPMs:glaxnimate
Size:11.25 MiB

Package: python-eth-tester-0.12.1-1.beta.1.fc42
Summary: Tool suite for testing Ethereum applications
RPMs:python3-eth-tester
Size:184.18 KiB

Package: python-mkdocs-git-committers-plugin-2-2.4.1-1.fc42
Summary: MkDocs plugin to create a list of contributors on the page
RPMs:python3-mkdocs-git-committers-plugin-2
Size:28.60 KiB

Package: python-mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin-1.3.0-1.fc42
Summary: Mkdocs plugin to display the last git modification date
RPMs:python3-mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin 
python3-mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin+all 
python3-mkdocs-git-revision-date-localized-plugin+base
Size:61.29 KiB

Package: rust-jiff0.1-0.1.29-1.fc42
Summary: Date-time library that encourages you to jump into the pit of success
RPMs:rust-jiff0.1+alloc-devel rust-jiff0.1+default-devel 
rust-jiff0.1+logging-devel rust-jiff0.1+serde-devel rust-jiff0.1+std-devel 
rust-jiff0.1+tz-system-devel rust-jiff0.1+tzdb-bundle-platform-devel 
rust-jiff0.1+tzdb-concatenated-devel rust-jiff0.1+tzdb-zoneinfo-devel 
rust-jiff0.1-devel
Size:530.91 KiB

Package: rust-xkbcommon0.7-0.7.0-1.fc42
Summary: Rust bindings and wrappers for libxkbcommon
RPMs:rust-xkbcommon0.7+as-raw-xcb-connection-devel 
rust-xkbcommon0.7+default-devel rust-xkbcommon0.7+memmap2-devel 
rust-xkbcommon0.7+wayland-devel rust-xkbcommon0.7+x11-devel 
rust-xkbcommon0.7-devel
Size:90.79 KiB

Package: sfp-master-1.0.5-1.fc42
Summary: Reading, writing SFP modules data
RPMs:sfp-master
Size:1.64 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  NetworkManager-1:1.51.90-1.fc42
Old package:  NetworkManager-1:1.51.6-1.fc42
Summary:  Network connection manager and user applications
RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth 
NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora 
NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel 
NetworkManager-ovs NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-team NetworkManager-tui 
NetworkManager-wifi NetworkManager-wwan
Size: 25.89 MiB
Size change:  -8.41 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 10 2025 Beniamino Galvani  - 1.51.7-1
  - Update to 1.51.7 release (development)

  * Mon Feb 17 2025 Beniamino Galvani  - 1.51.90-1
  - Update to 1.52-rc1 release (1.51.90)
  - Fix state handling in the dnsconfd DNS plugin


Package:  Singular-4.4.1-1.fc42
Old package:  Singular-4.4.0p4-2.fc42
Summary:  Computer Algebra System for polynomial computations
RPMs: Singular Singular-devel Singular-doc Singular-emacs 
Singular-libpolys Singular-libpolys-devel Singular-libs factory factory-devel 
factory-gftables
Size: 90.31 MiB
Size change:  613.64 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Feb 16 2025 Jerry James  - 4.4.1-1
  - Version 4.4.1
  - Drop upstreamed type-mismatch and fix-id-saturate patches
  - Drop unused Java BRs (thanks to Mari??n Kon??ek)
  - Remove dependency on surf-geometry


Package:  accerciser-3.46.2-1.fc42
Old package:  accerciser-3.44.1-2.fc42
Summary:  Interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop
RPMs: accerciser
Size: 1.85 MiB
Size change:  5.25 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Feb 12 2025 nmontero  - 3.46.2-1
  - Update to 3.46.2


Package:  actor-framework-1.0.2-1.20250216gitaea399b.fc42
Old package:  actor-framework-1.0.1-1.fc42
Summary:  An Open Source Implementation of the Actor Model in C++
RPMs: actor-framework actor-framework-devel actor-framework-examples
Size: 9.26 MiB
Size change:  121.14 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jan 16 2025 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.1-2
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild

  * Mon Feb 17 2025 topazus  - 1.0.2-1
  - update to latest git commit


Package:  blender-1:4.3.2-5.fc42
Old package:  blender-1:4.3.2-4.fc42
Summary:  3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros
Size: 243.77 MiB
Size change:  934.02 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat

Non-responsive maintainer check for ret2libc

[Andreas Schneider]

Hi,

we are trying to get a rebuild of rizin [1] but the maintainer doesn't react. 
Same applies to the co-maintainer. I've created a non-responsive maintainer 
bugzilla ticket at [2].


Best regards


Andreas

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2346253
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rizin/pull-request/5


-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: libnfs soname bump

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
> 
> Affected packages are:
> gvfs
> qemu
> vlc
> xine-lib
> kodi (RPM Fusion)
> mpd (RPM Fusion)

... and this bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331668

Hi Xavier,

I was just looking at the qemu situation again, and was wondering if
there's been any update on this since January?

I noticed that on Friday last week you did another build of libnfs-6
into the side tag, but the (Rawhide) side tag now only contains two
packages:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=105744&order=-build_id&latest=1

So do we need to do qemu again?  Is anything else blocking this?

My (only personal) opinion is we've spent a few months on this
already, and we should just update libnfs in Rawhide and packages that
haven't been updated yet should just have to deal with the
consequences.  They've had enough time to either fix their code or
remove the dependency.  But I appreciate that may cause pain ...

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines.  Supports shell scripting,
bindings from many languages.  http://libguestfs.org

-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Cancelled: FESCo Meeting (2025-02-18)

[Jednorozec]

I am canceling today's meeting. There are few open tickets,
that does not require us to sit in a meeting.

I'll chair the meeting the next week.

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =

Change: Switch to EROFS for Live Media 

https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3356
APPROVED now. (+4, 0, -0)

= Followups =

jdk25 as system jdk in f43 - can branching of f43 be delayed by week or 
(better) two?
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3362

FESCo Q&A during Flock 2025
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3361

publickey - jednorozec@radioypsilon.eu - 0x8E713EA4.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: libnfs soname bump

[Daniel P . Berrangé]

On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:38:14PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 02:44:56PM +0100, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > libnfs 6.0.0 bumps its soname from 14 to 16.
> > 
> > Affected packages are:
> > gvfs
> > qemu
> > vlc
> > xine-lib
> > kodi (RPM Fusion)
> > mpd (RPM Fusion)
> 
> ... and this bug:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2331668
> 
> Hi Xavier,
> 
> I was just looking at the qemu situation again, and was wondering if
> there's been any update on this since January?
> 
> I noticed that on Friday last week you did another build of libnfs-6
> into the side tag, but the (Rawhide) side tag now only contains two
> packages:
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=105744&order=-build_id&latest=1
> 
> So do we need to do qemu again?  Is anything else blocking this?

xine-lib was  FTBFS originally, but I see it has a GCC 15 fix applied
last week.

vlc seems to have a backport of a fix for libnfs6

gvfs is built in the side tag

QEMU was previously successfully built.

The other two packages are rpmfusion so shouldn't gate us at all.

> My (only personal) opinion is we've spent a few months on this
> already, and we should just update libnfs in Rawhide and packages that
> haven't been updated yet should just have to deal with the
> consequences.  They've had enough time to either fix their code or
> remove the dependency.  But I appreciate that may cause pain ...

It appears that we ought to be able to get everything built in the
side tag and merge it. I'll kick off another QEMU build for it, since
the last one was in the side tag pre-branching.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [Need help] Issue Authorizing fedpkg push in a Container.

[Milan Crha]

On Tue, 2025-02-18 at 09:32 +0100, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> Is there any other way to push my new code to the RPM repository?

Hi,
I usually run:

   kinit u...@fedoraproject.org

before using any fedpkg command which requires the user credentials and
then it works fine. I do not know whether it would work the same in a
container though.

Bye,
Milan

-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Need help with "cannot open display" error when %pyproject_check_import is run

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 02:17:49AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to build the latest version of input-remapper[1] and I
> guess some change to the test units has led to this error:
> 
> […]
> + /usr/bin/python3 -sP /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/import_all_modules.py -f
> /builddir/build/BUILD/input-remapper-2.1.1-build/input-remapper-2.1.1-1.fc42.x86_64-pyproject-modules
> Check import: inputremapper
> Check import: inputremapper.bin
> Check import: inputremapper.bin.input_remapper_control
> Check import: inputremapper.bin.input_remapper_gtk
> 
> (import_all_modules.py:1580): Gtk-WARNING **: 01:44:47.167: cannot open 
> display:
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QjGEES (%check)
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.QjGEES (%check)

It's not clear from your message, but are you trying to do a local
build of the packge, ie. 'fedpkg local' or 'rpmbuild ..'?  If so,
adding this into the spec file before it runs the tests should fix the
problem:

  unset DISPLAY

If this happens in (eg) Koji or mock then the test probably needs
fixing or disabling entirely.

Rich.

> 
> From the above message, I thought the error was caused by
> tests/integration/test_gui.py, but when I disabled it (by adding
> another ignore directive to pytest), the build still failed at the
> same point, with the same message and I admit I am lost.
> 
> Could someone please lend a hand?
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> A.
> 
> 
> 1. https://github.com/sezanzeb/input-remapper/releases/tag/2.1.1
> -- 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit

-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Need help] Issue Authorizing fedpkg push in a Container.

[Hangbin Liu]

Hi everyone,

Apologies if I’m sending this to the wrong list.

I’m facing an issue authorizing fedpkg push inside a container. When I run
the command, it provides a link for authorization. However, after logging in,
the link redirects to a localhost address, which is unreachable since I’m
running the command inside a container.

I also tried running git push directly, but it always returns "Authentication
failed," even when I enter the correct password.

Is there any other way to push my new code to the RPM repository?

Thanks in advance for your help!

Best
Hangbin
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20250218.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20250217.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20250218.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   102
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  13.62 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   4.15 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   198.52 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Security live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20250218.n.0.iso
Image: Games live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20250218.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Server dvd ppc64le
Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-Rawhide-20250217.n.0.iso
Image: Server boot ppc64le
Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-ppc64le-Rawhide-20250217.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: glaxnimate-0.5.80-1.fc43
Summary: A simple vector graphics animation program
RPMs:glaxnimate
Size:11.25 MiB

Package: python-eth-tester-0.12.1-1.beta.1.fc43
Summary: Tool suite for testing Ethereum applications
RPMs:python3-eth-tester
Size:184.25 KiB

Package: rust-ironrdp-dvc-0.1.2-1.fc43
Summary: DRDYNVC implementation and traits to implement dynamic virtual channels
RPMs:rust-ironrdp-dvc+default-devel rust-ironrdp-dvc+std-devel 
rust-ironrdp-dvc-devel
Size:39.03 KiB

Package: rust-jiff0.1-0.1.29-1.fc43
Summary: Date-time library that encourages you to jump into the pit of success
RPMs:rust-jiff0.1+alloc-devel rust-jiff0.1+default-devel 
rust-jiff0.1+logging-devel rust-jiff0.1+serde-devel rust-jiff0.1+std-devel 
rust-jiff0.1+tz-system-devel rust-jiff0.1+tzdb-bundle-platform-devel 
rust-jiff0.1+tzdb-concatenated-devel rust-jiff0.1+tzdb-zoneinfo-devel 
rust-jiff0.1-devel
Size:530.90 KiB

Package: sfp-master-1.0.5-1.fc43
Summary: Reading, writing SFP modules data
RPMs:sfp-master
Size:1.64 MiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  NetworkManager-1:1.51.90-1.fc43
Old package:  NetworkManager-1:1.51.6-1.fc42
Summary:  Network connection manager and user applications
RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth 
NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora 
NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel 
NetworkManager-ovs NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-team NetworkManager-tui 
NetworkManager-wifi NetworkManager-wwan
Size: 25.89 MiB
Size change:  -5.50 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 10 2025 Beniamino Galvani  - 1.51.7-1
  - Update to 1.51.7 release (development)

  * Mon Feb 17 2025 Beniamino Galvani  - 1.51.90-1
  - Update to 1.52-rc1 release (1.51.90)
  - Fix state handling in the dnsconfd DNS plugin


Package:  PySolFC-3.2.0-4.fc43
Old package:  PySolFC-3.2.0-3.fc43
Summary:  A collection of solitaire card games
RPMs: PySolFC
Size: 58.17 MiB
Size change:  48 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Feb 18 2025 Shlomi Fish  3.2.0-4
  - Trying to use tcl 9 / tk 9.
  - rhbz#2344906


Package:  accerciser-3.46.2-1.fc43
Old package:  accerciser-3.44.1-2.fc42
Summary:  Interactive Python accessibility explorer for the GNOME desktop
RPMs: accerciser
Size: 1.85 MiB
Size change:  5.27 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Feb 12 2025 nmontero  - 3.46.2-1
  - Update to 3.46.2


Package:  actor-framework-1.0.2-1.20250216gitaea399b.fc43
Old package:  actor-framework-1.0.1-1.fc42
Summary:  An Open Source Implementation of the Actor Model in C++
RPMs: actor-framework actor-framework-devel actor-framework-examples
Size: 9.26 MiB
Size change:  121.30 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jan 16 2025 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.1-2
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_42_Mass_Rebuild

  * Mon Feb 17 2025 topazus  - 1.0.2-1
  - update to latest git commit


Package:  awscli2-2.24.4-1.fc43
Old package:  awscli2-2.22.33-2.fc42
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS, version 2
RPMs: awscli2
Size: 13.61 MiB
Size change:  96.59 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 03 2025 Packit  - 2.23.11-1
  - Update to 2.23.11 upstream release
  - Resolves: rhbz#2337442

  * Thu Feb 13 2025 Packit  - 2.24.4-1
  - Update to 2.24.4 upstream release
  - Resolves: rhbz#2337442


Package:  bandit-1.8.3-1.fc43
Old package:  bandit-1.8.2-2.fc42
Summary:  A framework for performing security analysis of Python source code
RPMs: bandit
Size: 328.58 KiB
Size change:  4.37 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Feb 17 2025 Packit  - 1.8.3-1
  - Update to 1.8.3 upstream release
  - Resolves: rhbz#2346063


Package:  blender-1:4.3.2-5.fc43
Old package:  blender-1:4.3.2-4.fc42
Summary:  3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros
Size: 243.60 MiB
Size change:  753.73 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Feb 15 2025

Re: Gating Fedora updates on Fedora CoreOS CI

[Adam Williamson]

On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 21:22 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> 
> On 2/17/25 1:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-02-17 at 10:35 -0500, Dusty Mabe wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > One more question: are packagers able to restart the tests?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > @Dusty Mabe  will know better, but I don't 
> > > > think packagers can restart the tests currently.
> > > 
> > > No. Not currently. But it is something we could look into enabling and/or 
> > > making easier.
> > 
> > You might be surprised. It might actually work already without you
> > knowing it.
> > 
> > Clicking the "Re-Run Tests" button in Bodhi causes Bodhi to publish a
> > new bodhi.update.status.testing.koji-build-group.build.complete message
> > - which is the same topic I think I advised you to use for CoreOS
> > update test scheduling. The only difference between a 're-trigger'
> > message and the message that is published when the update is a key in
> > the message data called `re-trigger`. It's `true` for messages
> > published when "Re-Run Tests" is clicked, `false` otherwise.
> > 
> > If your scheduler triggers off `koji-build-group.build.complete`
> > messages and doesn't do anything special with the `re-trigger` key, it
> > probably works already.
> 
> Interesting. I'll have to look into it.
> 
> Does this have a side effect of causing all tests to re-run, even ones that 
> have already run and passed?

Unfortunately yeah. Well, more precisely, it depends on how your
scheduler behaves.

The `re-trigger` key is there so your scheduler *can*, if you like, be
smart about it: a scheduler could notice this is a re-run request and
say 'aha, ok, i'll only rerun failed tests'.

I haven't done this for the openQA scheduler yet as it's actually
rather tricky in that case (openQA doesn't have a handy 'just re-run
failures' option). But the possibility is there. If 'just re-run
failures' is easy in your case, might be worth hooking it up.
-- 
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net




-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue