Fedora rawhide compose report: 20241109.n.0 changes

2024-11-09 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20241108.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20241109.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  3
Added packages:  5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   41
Downgraded packages: 1

Size of added packages:  584.41 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   2.52 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 1.64 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   4.09 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: -5.28 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Scientific vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-Rawhide-20241108.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box
Image: Scientific vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-Rawhide-20241108.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
Image: Workstation live aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20241108.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: golang-github-chewxy-hm-1.0.0-1.fc42
Summary: A simple Hindley-Milner type system in Go
RPMs:golang-github-chewxy-hm-devel
Size:34.23 KiB

Package: golang-gorgonia-vecf32-0.9.0-1.fc42
Summary: Package vecf32 provides common functions and methods for slices of 
float32
RPMs:golang-gorgonia-vecf32-devel
Size:27.03 KiB

Package: golang-gorgonia-vecf64-0.9.0-1.fc42
Summary: Package vecf64 provides common functions and methods for slices of 
float64
RPMs:golang-gorgonia-vecf64-devel
Size:26.90 KiB

Package: maui-mauikit-arca-1.0.0-1.fc42
Summary: Maui Archiver for compressed files
RPMs:maui-mauikit-arca
Size:383.98 KiB

Package: obs-studio-plugin-vaapi-0.4.2-1.fc42
Summary: OBS Studio VAAPI support via GStreamer
RPMs:obs-studio-plugin-vaapi
Size:112.27 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  R-Rcpp-1.0.13-2.fc42
Old package:  R-Rcpp-1.0.13-1.fc41
Summary:  Seamless R and C++ Integration
RPMs: R-Rcpp R-Rcpp-devel R-Rcpp-examples
Size: 9.99 MiB
Size change:  -562 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Nov 08 2024 Mattias Ellert  - 1.0.13-2
  - Require R >= 4.5.0 for new APIs (backport from upstream)


Package:  adoptium-temurin-java-repository-1-12.fc42
Old package:  adoptium-temurin-java-repository-1-11.fc42
Summary:  Fedora package repository files for yum and dnf along with gpg 
public keys
RPMs: adoptium-temurin-java-repository
Size: 32.23 KiB
Size change:  3.66 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Nov 08 2024 Jiri Vanek  - 1-12
  - obsoleting jmods, staticlibs and openjfx (including openjfx8)


Package:  anaconda-42.13-1.fc42
Old package:  anaconda-42.12-1.fc42
Summary:  Graphical system installer
RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui 
anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-install-img-deps anaconda-live anaconda-tui 
anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel
Size: 16.99 MiB
Size change:  16.35 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Nov 08 2024 Packit  - 42.13-1
  - Test for kickstart scripts (akankovs)
  - Migrate the %pre-install, %post, %onerror and %traceback scripts
(akankovs)
  - Suppress warning from systemd user session (jkonecny)
  - Use log levels when getting logs from GLib (jkonecny)
  - Remove GLib logging condition for HW logging (jkonecny)
  - Move GLib imports to pyanaconda.core.glib (jkonecny)
  - Redirect only GLib loggers to Journal (mkolman)
  - docs: Collect release notes for F41 (k.koukiou)
  - pyanaconda: storage: workaround for Virtio Block Device being displayed as
0x1af4 (k.koukiou)


Package:  anaconda-webui-18-1.fc42
Old package:  anaconda-webui-17-1.fc42
Summary:  Anaconda installer Web interface
RPMs: anaconda-webui
Size: 1.44 MiB
Size change:  5.87 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Nov 08 2024 Packit  - 18-1
  - reclaim: Make the list scroll instead of the modal body
  - reclaim: Adjust layout and alignment
  - ux: remove 'Make sure to have backed your data' warning
  - storage: show device type not format type for non partitions
  - ux: switch font weight to 'bold' for the storage actions in review
  - storage: Hide mount point mapping scenario when no mountable partitions are 
available
  - Open external links in firefox without the custom profile
  - Move disk encryption under generic storage configuration step
  - review: show device type if it's formatted as btrfs
  - storage: cockpit: fix UI flickering when exiting cockpit storage
  - Do not permit clicking 'Modify storage' button when installation has been 
started


Package:  bash-5.2.37-1.fc42
Old package:  bash-5.2.32-2.fc42
Summary:  The GNU Bourne Again shell
RPMs: bash bash-devel bash-doc
Size: 13.52 MiB
Size change:  1.23 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Nov 08 2024 Siteshwar Vashisht  - 5.2.37-1
  - Update to bash-5.2 patchlevel 37
Resolves: #2314348


Package:  ccdciel-0.9.88-1.fc42
Old package:  ccdciel-0.9.87-1.fc41
Summary:  CCD capture software
RPMs: ccdci

Fedora eln compose report: 20241110.n.0 changes

2024-11-09 Thread Fedora ELN Report 
OLD: Fedora-eln-20241109.n.0
NEW: Fedora-eln-20241110.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   6
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   30.14 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   17.54 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  ImageMagick-1:7.1.1.40-1.eln143
Old package:  ImageMagick-1:7.1.1.39-1.eln143
Summary:  An X application for displaying and manipulating images
RPMs: ImageMagick ImageMagick-c++ ImageMagick-libs
Size: 10.98 MiB
Size change:  9.58 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Nov 09 2024 Packit  - 1:7.1.1.40-1
  - Update to version 7.1.1.40
  - Resolves: rhbz#2324946


Package:  ibus-typing-booster-2.26.11-1.eln143
Old package:  ibus-typing-booster-2.26.8-1.eln143
Summary:  A completion input method
RPMs: ibus-typing-booster
Size: 1.21 MiB
Size change:  -43.15 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Nov 09 2024 Mike FABIAN  - 2.26.11-1
  - Update to 2.26.11
  - Improve detection of Wayland session (Resolves: https://github.com/mike-
fabian/ibus-typing-booster/issues/561)
  - Support non-ASCII input for m17n-db input methods (Resolves:
https://github.com/mike-fabian/ibus-typing-booster/issues/537)
  - Improve ???class KeyEvent???: Prepend 'S-' to msymbol when Shift is pressed
and is is a space or not printable
  - Show also the languages supported by a font in emoji-picker (only when -d
or --debug is used)


Package:  libxcrypt-4.4.36-10.eln143
Old package:  libxcrypt-4.4.36-9.eln143
Summary:  Extended crypt library for descrypt, md5crypt, bcrypt, and others
RPMs: libxcrypt libxcrypt-devel libxcrypt-static
Size: 1018.95 KiB
Size change:  3.58 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Nov 08 2024 Bj??rn Esser  - 4.4.36-10
  - Build with -Wl,--no-tls-get-addr-optimize on ppc64(le)
  - Remove cludge from patch for MT-Safeness in crypt and crypt_gensalt


Package:  mingw-glib2-2.83.0-1.eln143
Old package:  mingw-glib2-2.82.2-1.eln143
Summary:  MinGW Windows GLib2 library
RPMs: mingw32-glib2 mingw32-glib2-static mingw64-glib2 
mingw64-glib2-static
Size: 9.79 MiB
Size change:  35.69 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Nov 09 2024 Sandro Mani  - 2.83.0-1
  - Update to 2.83.0


Package:  mingw-pixman-0.44.0-1.eln143
Old package:  mingw-pixman-0.43.4-2.eln142
Summary:  MinGW Windows Pixman library
RPMs: mingw32-pixman mingw64-pixman
Size: 584.95 KiB
Size change:  217 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Nov 09 2024 Sandro Mani  - 0.44.0-1
  - Update to 0.44.0


Package:  valkey-8.0.1-2.eln143
Old package:  valkey-8.0.0-3.eln143
Summary:  A persistent key-value database
RPMs: valkey valkey-devel
Size: 6.60 MiB
Size change:  11.62 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Oct 07 2024 Jonathan Wright  - 8.0.1-1
  - update to 8.0.1 rhbz#2316254
fixes CVE-2024-31449
fixes CVE-2024-31227
fixes CVE-2024-31228

  * Mon Oct 07 2024 Jonathan Wright  - 8.0.1-2
  - fix spec for epel8
  - buildrequires python3 for docs



= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

2024-11-09 Thread Ben Beasley 
Well, it’s possible that these packages will find a new primary 
maintainer in Fedora: one of the current co-maintainers, one of the 
maintainers of the mentioned dependent packages, or some other Fedora 
packager who has an interest in them.


If that doesn’t happen, and the packages end up being retired for the 
next release of Fedora, then the best workaround if you were using the 
system packages in your own work would indeed be to install from PyPI 
instead (not system-wide, preferably into a virtualenv).


Pure-Python libraries like this are usually packaged and maintained 
mostly to support particular applications in Fedora (perhaps very 
indirectly) rather than out of a desire to offer system versions of as 
many PyPI packages as possible.


On 11/9/24 5:49 PM, Blaise Pabon wrote:

Ben,
Thank you for your service!

Would the workaround be to install from pypi instead?
Blaise

On Sat, Nov 9, 2024, 1:44 PM Ben Beasley  wrote:

I’m orphaning python-opentelemetry and the following related packages:

 - python-opentelemetry-contrib

 - python-opentelemetry-propagator-aws-xray

 - python-opentelemetry-resource-detector-azure

 - python-opentelemetry-sdk-extension-aws

The packages are inherently messy, but are in good condition.
However,
they are a bit fussy to maintain, and I no longer maintain
anything that
relies on them, so I’m choosing to use my time elsewhere.

This will affect python-elastic-transport, which depends on
python3dist(opentelemetry-api) and python3dist(opentelemetry-sdk)
from
python-opentelemetry; and it will affect python-sentry-sdk, which
depends on python3dist(opentelemetry-distro).

Maintainers of those affected packages have received this email
directly; so have co-maintainers of the orphaned packages.

An update to the latest versions of python-opentelemetry and
python-opentelemetry-contrib will require dealing with some issues
around old protobuf and grpc versions in Fedora; see
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-opentelemetry/pull-request/19.

-- 
___

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: guadeque media player: SPDX license check

2024-11-09 Thread Miroslav Suchý 

Dne 09. 11. 24 v 7:44 odp. Martin Gansser napsal(a):

Hi,

iI have released a new version of the mediaplayer guayadeque [1] and migrated 
the license to SPDX.
However, I am not sure if this is correct.
Can someone with experience have a look at the spec file ?

[1]https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/guayadeque/blob/rawhide/f/guayadeque.spec

Regards
Martin


Technically it is correct:

 $ license-validate -v 'GPL-3.0-or-later AND BSD-3-Clause AND LGPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH 
WxWindows-exception-3.1'

Approved license

You correctly ignored MD5 part because of 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/misc/#_licensing_of_rsa_implementations_of_md5


But not sure where you got: LGPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later WITH 
WxWindows-exception-3.1
It is mentioned in defconfig/guayadeque.appdata.xml but not anywhere else. And 
no file mantion that in header.
You may want to open upstream issue to discuss this.

On the other hand, in the same file is license of that metadata CC0-1.0 that 
should be mentioned in license tag.

BTW here is full scan using scancode that is much better than licensecheck: 
https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spdx-reports/guayadeque.html


I got it using:

scancode --license --license-references --html /tmp/scan.html -n8 .

--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

2024-11-09 Thread Blaise Pabon 
Ben,
Thank you for your service!

Would the workaround be to install from pypi instead?
Blaise

On Sat, Nov 9, 2024, 1:44 PM Ben Beasley  wrote:

> I’m orphaning python-opentelemetry and the following related packages:
>
>  - python-opentelemetry-contrib
>
>  - python-opentelemetry-propagator-aws-xray
>
>  - python-opentelemetry-resource-detector-azure
>
>  - python-opentelemetry-sdk-extension-aws
>
> The packages are inherently messy, but are in good condition. However,
> they are a bit fussy to maintain, and I no longer maintain anything that
> relies on them, so I’m choosing to use my time elsewhere.
>
> This will affect python-elastic-transport, which depends on
> python3dist(opentelemetry-api) and python3dist(opentelemetry-sdk) from
> python-opentelemetry; and it will affect python-sentry-sdk, which
> depends on python3dist(opentelemetry-distro).
>
> Maintainers of those affected packages have received this email
> directly; so have co-maintainers of the orphaned packages.
>
> An update to the latest versions of python-opentelemetry and
> python-opentelemetry-contrib will require dealing with some issues
> around old protobuf and grpc versions in Fedora; see
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-opentelemetry/pull-request/19.
>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

2024-11-09 Thread Blaise Pabon 
How interesting, thank you.
I have wanted to become a package maintainer for ten years and every
few years I get a little closer.

Blaise

On Sat, Nov 9, 2024, 5:41 PM Ben Beasley  wrote:

> Well, it’s possible that these packages will find a new primary maintainer
> in Fedora: one of the current co-maintainers, one of the maintainers of the
> mentioned dependent packages, or some other Fedora packager who has an
> interest in them.
>
> If that doesn’t happen, and the packages end up being retired for the next
> release of Fedora, then the best workaround if you were using the system
> packages in your own work would indeed be to install from PyPI instead (not
> system-wide, preferably into a virtualenv).
>
> Pure-Python libraries like this are usually packaged and maintained mostly
> to support particular applications in Fedora (perhaps very indirectly)
> rather than out of a desire to offer system versions of as many PyPI
> packages as possible.
> On 11/9/24 5:49 PM, Blaise Pabon wrote:
>
> Ben,
> Thank you for your service!
>
> Would the workaround be to install from pypi instead?
> Blaise
>
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2024, 1:44 PM Ben Beasley  wrote:
>
>> I’m orphaning python-opentelemetry and the following related packages:
>>
>>  - python-opentelemetry-contrib
>>
>>  - python-opentelemetry-propagator-aws-xray
>>
>>  - python-opentelemetry-resource-detector-azure
>>
>>  - python-opentelemetry-sdk-extension-aws
>>
>> The packages are inherently messy, but are in good condition. However,
>> they are a bit fussy to maintain, and I no longer maintain anything that
>> relies on them, so I’m choosing to use my time elsewhere.
>>
>> This will affect python-elastic-transport, which depends on
>> python3dist(opentelemetry-api) and python3dist(opentelemetry-sdk) from
>> python-opentelemetry; and it will affect python-sentry-sdk, which
>> depends on python3dist(opentelemetry-distro).
>>
>> Maintainers of those affected packages have received this email
>> directly; so have co-maintainers of the orphaned packages.
>>
>> An update to the latest versions of python-opentelemetry and
>> python-opentelemetry-contrib will require dealing with some issues
>> around old protobuf and grpc versions in Fedora; see
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-opentelemetry/pull-request/19.
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

2024-11-09 Thread Jonathan Wright via devel 
Luis is still around.  I poked him on another channel I have with him.

On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 9:11 AM Mikel Olasagasti 
wrote:

> Hi
>
> I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis
> Enrique Bazan De Leon)[1]. This email is part of that process.
>
> Luis Enrique has not responded to the request of updating
> transifex-client[2]. The package doesn't work anymore and a new Go
> based one is required.
>
> Kind regards,
> Mikel Olasagasti - mikelo2
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277499
> [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/transifex-client
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis Enrique Bazan De Leon)

2024-11-09 Thread Mikel Olasagasti 
Hi

I have opened a non-responsive maintainer check for lbazan (Luis
Enrique Bazan De Leon)[1]. This email is part of that process.

Luis Enrique has not responded to the request of updating
transifex-client[2]. The package doesn't work anymore and a new Go
based one is required.

Kind regards,
Mikel Olasagasti - mikelo2

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277499
[2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/transifex-client
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-11-09 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 07. 11. 24 22:41, maxw...@gtmx.me wrote:

python-httptools (maintained by: aekoroglu)
python-httptools-0.6.0-6.fc41.src requires http-parser-devel = 
2.9.4-12.fc41
python3-httptools-0.6.0-6.fc41.x86_64 requires 
libhttp_parser.so.2()(64bit)



If http-parser gets retired, we can restore usage of the bundled one. It 
already bundles llhttp anyway.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
Fedora Matrix: mhroncok

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

rawhide and f41 build errors.

2024-11-09 Thread Steve Dickson 

Hello,

Out of the blue rawhide scratch builds [1]
are now failing and f41 builds [2] are failing
but f40 builds [3] are succeeding and they
are all the same code!

Late Oct I made a release so their repo
heads are all the same.

Does anybody know what has changed in the building
process? Or better does anybody know what I have
to change to make the builds work?

Note: if this has been discussed on another thread
please point me to it... I'm dreadfully behind on
reading this list.

tia,

steved.


[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125672515
[2] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125673090
[3] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=125673379

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

guadeque media player: SPDX license check

2024-11-09 Thread Martin Gansser 
Hi,

iI have released a new version of the mediaplayer guayadeque [1] and migrated 
the license to SPDX.
However, I am not sure if this is correct.
Can someone with experience have a look at the spec file ?

[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/guayadeque/blob/rawhide/f/guayadeque.spec

Regards
Martin
-- 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaning python-opentelemetry and related packages

2024-11-09 Thread Ben Beasley 

I’m orphaning python-opentelemetry and the following related packages:

    - python-opentelemetry-contrib

    - python-opentelemetry-propagator-aws-xray

    - python-opentelemetry-resource-detector-azure

    - python-opentelemetry-sdk-extension-aws

The packages are inherently messy, but are in good condition. However, 
they are a bit fussy to maintain, and I no longer maintain anything that 
relies on them, so I’m choosing to use my time elsewhere.


This will affect python-elastic-transport, which depends on 
python3dist(opentelemetry-api) and python3dist(opentelemetry-sdk) from 
python-opentelemetry; and it will affect python-sentry-sdk, which 
depends on python3dist(opentelemetry-distro).


Maintainers of those affected packages have received this email 
directly; so have co-maintainers of the orphaned packages.


An update to the latest versions of python-opentelemetry and 
python-opentelemetry-contrib will require dealing with some issues 
around old protobuf and grpc versions in Fedora; see 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-opentelemetry/pull-request/19.


--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue