Re: [dev] [dwm] [patch] floating window stacking
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:20:40AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote: > (...) > > The current approach has been in place since the very early beginning > of dwm, so I don't intend to change it in the ways you suggest. Thank you. -P pgpqt13AVRC4d.pgp Description: PGP signature
[dev] Urgent window shortcut
Greetings comrades,
attached is a patch to add a Mod + u, which will switch
to the next urgent window in the window list. This idea
was proudly stolen from awesome.
Sincerely,
Christoph Lohmann
diff -r cb2ba6763beb config.def.h
--- a/config.def.h Sun Oct 09 20:53:51 2011 +0200
+++ b/config.def.h Mon Dec 12 16:26:30 2011 +0100
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
{ MODKEY, XK_Return, zoom, {0} },
{ MODKEY, XK_Tab,view, {0} },
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_c, killclient, {0} },
+ { MODKEY, XK_u, showurgent, {0} },
{ MODKEY, XK_t, setlayout, {.v = &layouts[0]} },
{ MODKEY, XK_f, setlayout, {.v = &layouts[1]} },
{ MODKEY, XK_m, setlayout, {.v = &layouts[2]} },
diff -r cb2ba6763beb dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sun Oct 09 20:53:51 2011 +0200
+++ b/dwm.c Mon Dec 12 16:26:30 2011 +0100
@@ -219,6 +219,7 @@
static void setmfact(const Arg *arg);
static void setup(void);
static void showhide(Client *c);
+static void showurgent(const Arg *arg);
static void sigchld(int unused);
static void spawn(const Arg *arg);
static void tag(const Arg *arg);
@@ -1620,6 +1621,30 @@
}
void
+showurgent(const Arg *arg) {
+ Monitor *m;
+ Client *c;
+ Arg a;
+
+ for(m = mons; m; m = m->next) {
+ for(c = m->clients; c; c = c->next) {
+ if(c->isurgent) {
+if(m != selmon) {
+ unfocus(selmon->sel, True);
+ selmon = c->mon;
+ focus(NULL);
+}
+a.ui = c->tags;
+view(&a);
+focus(c);
+arrange(selmon);
+return;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+void
sigchld(int unused) {
if(signal(SIGCHLD, sigchld) == SIG_ERR)
die("Can't install SIGCHLD handler");
[dev] simplyread
Hi good fellows, I mentioned briefly in another thread that I'd made a nicer, much simpler alternative to readable and its kin; simplyread. Well, mostly people hated that it removed links, and in some cases that it added its own style. These things can now be turned on & off in your preferred browser, through the addon options, so I figure everybody should love it now. If anyone doesn't love it, let me know how to change that. http://njw.me.uk/software/simplyread Nick pgpJKO3hqB0Zt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] simplyread
Hey, On 12 December 2011 18:37, Nick wrote: > I mentioned briefly in another thread that I'd made a nicer, much > simpler alternative to readable and its kin; simplyread. Well, > mostly people hated that it removed links, and in some cases that it > added its own style. These things can now be turned on & off in your > preferred browser, through the addon options, so I figure everybody > should love it now. If anyone doesn't love it, let me know how to > change that. Much much much better! I'll be sure to try this out (all the other readability plugins have let me down). A few issues, though: 1. Sometimes it only displays a subsection of an article. e.g., [1]. 2. Can I remain in simplyread mode even after I've clicked a link? 3. In Firefox 6.0.2 I don't seem to have any configuration options. 4. Can you avoid showing the if an is present? [1]: http://blog.asmartbear.com/startup-hiring-advice.html Thanks, cls
Re: [dev] simplyread
Quoth Connor Lane Smith: > Much much much better! Woopdeedoo. > 1. Sometimes it only displays a subsection of an article. e.g., [1]. > [1]: http://blog.asmartbear.com/startup-hiring-advice.html Yep. One of the disadvantages of the super-simple algorithm is that odd HTML isn't always well handled. But that's always going to be the case, to an extent. > 2. Can I remain in simplyread mode even after I've clicked a link? That'd be lovely, wouldn't it? However, it'd involve rather heavier integration with the browser. Which is something I probably don't have the patience for. > 3. In Firefox 6.0.2 I don't seem to have any configuration options. Yeah. They work in 7+. Mozilla changed the API for v7, and I'm too lazy to make it work with the old one. You could probably set the options from about:config (search for 'simplyread'). > 4. Can you avoid showing the if an is present? I probably should, yeah. I'll add it to the TODO. Thanks for the feedback. Any more would be welcome. pgpkTNU44VBYL.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [dev] simplyread
On 12 December 2011 22:35, Nick wrote: > Yep. One of the disadvantages of the super-simple algorithm is that > odd HTML isn't always well handled. But that's always going to be > the case, to an extent. Fair enough. I noticed pretty much every other readability plugin failed when encountering an unclosed . It would be really nice if every site were to use the HTML5 , in which case we could just grab that and call it a day. Ahh, if only. > That'd be lovely, wouldn't it? However, it'd involve rather heavier > integration with the browser. Which is something I probably don't > have the patience for. There are probably pros and cons to that approach, too. I'm sure I'll manage to hit M-r. ;) > Yeah. They work in 7+. Mozilla changed the API for v7, and I'm too > lazy to make it work with the old one. You could probably set the > options from about:config (search for 'simplyread'). Yep, that works fine. And I use 9.0a2 most of the time, anyway. > Thanks for the feedback. Any more would be welcome. I'll probably end up using this a lot (over time my tolerance for poorly designed websites has quickly approached zero), so I'll let you know if I find any other bugs. Anyway, really nice. I love the styling, btw -- very pleasant to read. Thanks, cls
[dev] what's your opinion on Go
Hi all, I would like to learn a new programming language. I do not know C. As I remember positive reactions on this list when Go came out, I would like to know if people still think it might be a 'better C'. One thing I like about Go is that is seems more suitable for server/web stuff, which is where I 'earn my bread' (working in Java and Javascript mainly, also Python) . But is it also good for building stuff like dmenu, dwm, cli tools in general etc? Or is C still king here? Cheers, Arian
