Re: Latest test builds
The current 4.2.x test builds were done w/ an unpatched EPM. All later ones will use a patched version. > On Jan 23, 2019, at 5:47 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 1/20/19 7:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> I've uploaded the latest test builds for macOS and Linux 64. >> These are based on ~r1851640 and include 2 main updates from >> the earlier one: >> >> o beanshell now included >> o macOS path bug should now be squashed >> (https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127965) >> >> Let me know if anyone wants me to kick off a Linux 32bit >> build. >> >> Find them here: >> >> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/4.2.0-dev-r1851640/ >> >> Cheers! > > > Hi all -- > > I wanted to test out the 4.2 version. Normally I use rpm -i to install and > use --prefix= option to put the test version where I want it. For > some reason, I keep getting a "openoffice is not relocatable" error on this > package -- CentOS 7-64. I don't know if this is a "new" enforcement with the > rpm version I have -- 4.11.3 -- or a build issue with the 4.2 test version. > > Thanks for any insights you have. > > -- > MzK > > >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Building AOO for Linux on different environments
This looks like it's because the EPM was not built patched for AOO... Did you use 4.4.2? And add --enable-aoo ? > On Jan 24, 2019, at 1:41 AM, Mechtilde wrote: > > Hello, > > Now I built on CentOS 7 again with out success. > > I used the recent epm version as mentioned in the wiki and a recent > checkout from aoo42x branch. > > I get the message: > ERROR: ERROR: Did not find file: RPMS/openoffice-draw.spec > in function: prepare_packages > > dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.rpm' > > 1 module(s): > instsetoo_native > need(s) to be rebuilt > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/util > > Kind regards > > Am 23.01.19 um 16:29 schrieb Mechtilde: >> Hello Jim, >> >> Am 23.01.19 um 15:53 schrieb Jim Jagielski: >>> What does 'epm --version' say on both systems? >>> On Jan 23, 2019, at 8:50 AM, Mechtilde wrote: Hello, I did it now under Debian 8 again. Tere it works as expected and builds DEBs and RPMs. >> >> Here epm is the ship version 3.7 Kind regards Am 23.01.19 um 07:40 schrieb Mechtilde: > Hello, > > to document the problems I found I start a new thread. > > First I did a clean build on Debian 9 with system epm. It builds neither > rpm nor debs. it uses r 1851845. >> >> The epm version is 4.2 after it didn't works with the shipped version. >> > > The error message is: > > "... creating installation set in > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/install/en-US > ... > ... removing old installation directories ... > ... creating installation set in > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/rpm/install/en-US > ... > ... removing old installation directories ... > Redundant argument in sprintf at > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/solenv/bin/modules/installer/logger.pm line > 192. > ... creating epm list file epm_gid_Module_Langpack_Draw_en_US.lst ... > ... checking pool package ... > ... packaging required > ... starting unpatched epm ... > ... /usr/bin/fakeroot /usr/bin/epm -f deb openoffice-en-us-draw > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/deb/listfile/en-US/epm_gid_Module_Langpack_Draw_en_US.lst > --output-dir DEBS -v2 2>&1 | ... > Redundant argument in sprintf at > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/solenv/bin/modules/installer/logger.pm line > 192. > ... creating epm list file epm_gid_Module_Langpack_Math_en_US.lst ... > ... checking pool package ... > ... packaging required > ... starting unpatched epm ... > ... /usr/bin/epm -f rpm openoffice-en-US-math > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/rpm/listfile/en-US/epm_gid_Module_Langpack_Math_en_US.lst > --output-dir RPMS -v2 2>&1 | ... > Redundant argument in sprintf at > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/solenv/bin/modules/installer/logger.pm line > 192. > Redundant argument in sprintf at > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/solenv/bin/modules/installer/logger.pm line > 192. > Redundant argument in sprintf at > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/solenv/bin/modules/installer/logger.pm line > 192. > > ** > ERROR: ERROR: "/usr/bin/epm -f rpm openoffice-en-US-math > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/rpm/listfile/en-US/epm_gid_Module_Langpack_Math_en_US.lst > --output-dir RPMS -v2 2>&1 |"! > in function: call_epm > ** > ... cleaning the output tree ... > ... removing directory /tmp/ooopackaging/i_176461548197099 ... > ... removing directory > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/rpm/stripped/en-US > ... > Error: ERROR: "/usr/bin/epm -f rpm openoffice-en-US-math > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/unxlngx6.pro/Apache_OpenOffice/rpm/listfile/en-US/epm_gid_Module_Langpack_Math_en_US.lst > --output-dir RPMS -v2 2>&1 |"! > in function: call_epmstopping log at Tue Jan 22 23:45:13 2019 > dmake: Error code 255, while making 'openoffice_en-US.rpm' > > 1 module(s): > instsetoo_native > need(s) to be rebuilt > > Reason(s): > > ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/instsetoo_native/util > > When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build > by running: > > build --all:instsetoo_native > " > > I looked at > /home/mechtilde/aoo42x/main/solenv/bin/modules/installer/logger.pm but > no idea to fix it. > > Some hints? > > Regards > -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice >>
Re: Building AOO for Linux on different environments
Am 24.01.19 um 13:50 schrieb Jim Jagielski: > This looks like it's because the EPM was not built patched for AOO... > > Did you use 4.4.2? And add --enable-aoo ? I use 4.4.1 with --enable-aoo. This was the link you gave me. I will try it with 4.4.2 this evening. Kind regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian Developer ## PGP encryption welcome ## F0E3 7F3D C87A 4998 2899 39E7 F287 7BBA 141A AD7F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
EPM 4.4.2
EPM 3.7 is very, very old, and useless for macOS. However, the later version of EPM, which do allow macOS to be built, don't have the required AOO patches in them. So what I've done is pulled the latest EPM version (4.4.1), added the AOO patches back in, and released this as 4.4.2: https://github.com/jimjag/epm Just for the heck of it, I also have an up-to-date version of dmake as well: https://github.com/jimjag/dmake - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Reporting broken download link
Problem description there is a broken link when trying to download SK language (either full program or just language pack). This was on Windows 10 Pro. (What does not work? What do you expect?) Browser variables Values navigator.appCodeName Mozilla navigator.appName Netscape navigator.appVersion 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/64.0.3282.140 Safari/537.36 Edge/17.17134 navigator.platform Win32 navigator.oscpu undefined navigator.cpuClass undefined navigator.product Gecko navigator.productSub 20030107 navigator.vendor navigator.vendorSub navigator.language en-US navigator.browserLanguage undefined navigator.userLanguage undefined navigator.systemLanguage undefined navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/64.0.3282.140 Safari/537.36 Edge/17.17134 Debian / Ubuntu / IceWeasel ? No / No / No Stable Release JavaScript functions/variables Values Language ISO code sk Language ISO code (from select box) sk Release matrix platform position (full) 11 Release matrix platform position (lp) 12 Release matrix platform array data y,123 Release matrix language array data sk,Slovak,Slovenský jazyk (slovenčina),y,sk/ UI platform name Windows (EXE) UI platform name (not supported) Platform (short) win32 URL platform name (full) Win_x86_install URL platform name (lp) Win_x86_langpack URL platform name (from select box) win32 Version (from select box) 4.1.6 File name (full) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_install_sk.exe File name (lp) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_langpack_sk.exe File extension .exe File size (full) (MByte) 123 File size (lp) (MByte) 11 Release info Milestone AOO416m1 | Build ID 9790 | SVN r1844436 | Released 2018-11-18 Download file link (full) https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/sk/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_install_sk.exe/download Download file link (lp) https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/sk/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_langpack_sk.exe/download Checksum file link (full) (here for MD5) Checksum file link (lp) (here for MD5) Base URL to Sourceforge.net https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/ Base URL to Apache Archive https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.6 getLinkSelection() (download URL) undefined isLanguageSupported() (true/false) ? true Show the sub-box (true/false) ? true General error (true/false) ? false Thanks, Geoff
Re: Reporting broken download link
With the links [1] and [2] I can download the installation files for SK language. Maybe it's just a temporary download or Internet problem and you can try later again. [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/sk/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_install_sk.exe/download [2] https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/sk/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_langpack_sk.exe/download Marcus Am 24.01.19 um 17:34 schrieb Geoff Klimko: Problem description there is a broken link when trying to download SK language (either full program or just language pack). This was on Windows 10 Pro. (What does not work? What do you expect?) Browser variables Values navigator.appCodeName Mozilla navigator.appName Netscape navigator.appVersion 5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/64.0.3282.140 Safari/537.36 Edge/17.17134 navigator.platform Win32 navigator.oscpu undefined navigator.cpuClass undefined navigator.product Gecko navigator.productSub 20030107 navigator.vendor navigator.vendorSub navigator.language en-US navigator.browserLanguage undefined navigator.userLanguage undefined navigator.systemLanguage undefined navigator.userAgent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/64.0.3282.140 Safari/537.36 Edge/17.17134 Debian / Ubuntu / IceWeasel ? No / No / No Stable Release JavaScript functions/variables Values Language ISO code sk Language ISO code (from select box) sk Release matrix platform position (full) 11 Release matrix platform position (lp) 12 Release matrix platform array data y,123 Release matrix language array data sk,Slovak,Slovenský jazyk (slovenčina),y,sk/ UI platform name Windows (EXE) UI platform name (not supported) Platform (short) win32 URL platform name (full) Win_x86_install URL platform name (lp) Win_x86_langpack URL platform name (from select box) win32 Version (from select box) 4.1.6 File name (full) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_install_sk.exe File name (lp) Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_langpack_sk.exe File extension .exe File size (full) (MByte) 123 File size (lp) (MByte) 11 Release info Milestone AOO416m1 | Build ID 9790 | SVN r1844436 | Released 2018-11-18 Download file link (full) https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/sk/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_install_sk.exe/download Download file link (lp) https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/sk/Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.6_Win_x86_langpack_sk.exe/download Checksum file link (full) (here for MD5) Checksum file link (lp) (here for MD5) Base URL to Sourceforge.net https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.6/binaries/ Base URL to Apache Archive https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.6 getLinkSelection() (download URL) undefined isLanguageSupported() (true/false) ? true Show the sub-box (true/false) ? true General error (true/false) ? false - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Version trunk in bugzilla
No further opinions? Come on :-) Marcus Am 19.01.19 um 12:11 schrieb Marcus: Am 19.01.19 um 09:39 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Maybe a version trunk would help? before I spent 30 minutes to update all the products in BZ with a new version let me summarize what we have and what is really needed: - trunk is used to commit changes that could be integrated in a release somewhen in the future - so, totally unspecified in time. IMHO it's not helpful as it is not clear at which point in time it was trunk and when no longer. In SVN, etc. it's OK but not in an issue tracker. - trunk2 (I don't know if this was just a typo) doesn't tell me what could be meant. - 4.5.0 is possible - but what's about 4.3.0 and 4.4.0 - do we want to skip them? At the moment I cannot imagine for what reason. The suggestion is to plan with a 4.3.0 when 4.2.0 is done and released. Sure, maybe there is a big change that would justify a 5.0.0 release. But at the moment nobody can oversee this. My proposal is to create a 4.3.0 version (or better milestone) to use for every commit to trunk. The consequence is that the code in trunk has to be adjusted (again) to replace every line that include a 4.5.0 with 4.3.0. What do you all think? Thanks Marcus On 19.01.19 08:13, Mechtilde wrote: can we get the version "trunk2 in bugzilla to track the issues which comms there and are not in the 420-dev branch. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Version trunk in bugzilla
Marcus write: No further opinions? Come on :-) More or less, my opinion is the same as yours: we can't use "trunk" since trunk is a moving target ("trunk" today is something different than "trunk" in a few months). I think we used codes such as 4.2.0-dev and this should be the way to go, so 4.3.0-dev would be a natural choice. Of course, we might want to use different numbers in future, but for the moment this is better than a generic "trunk". Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Version trunk in bugzilla
works for me :) > On Jan 24, 2019, at 4:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > > Marcus write: >> No further opinions? Come on :-) > > More or less, my opinion is the same as yours: we can't use "trunk" since > trunk is a moving target ("trunk" today is something different than "trunk" > in a few months). I think we used codes such as 4.2.0-dev and this should be > the way to go, so 4.3.0-dev would be a natural choice. Of course, we might > want to use different numbers in future, but for the moment this is better > than a generic "trunk". > > Regards, > Andrea. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org