works for me :)
> On Jan 24, 2019, at 4:26 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Marcus write:
>> No further opinions? Come on :-)
>
> More or less, my opinion is the same as yours: we can't use "trunk" since
> trunk is a moving target ("trunk" today is something different than "trunk"
> in a few months). I think we used codes such as 4.2.0-dev and this should be
> the way to go, so 4.3.0-dev would be a natural choice. Of course, we might
> want to use different numbers in future, but for the moment this is better
> than a generic "trunk".
>
> Regards,
> Andrea.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
