Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC2 release

2020-07-12 Thread Abdelatif Guettouche
It's been 4 days, should we wait a bit longer for others before
calling the IPMC vote?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
 wrote:
>
> +1
> - Incubating in name
> - Signature and hash OK
> - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist
> - Can build from source
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:44 PM Jerpelea, Alin  wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > I checked hashes, signatures, required files
> > Manually build spresense nsh config and checked that all is ok
> >
> > Thanks Brennan!
> >
> > //Alin
> > 
> > Från: Adam Feuer 
> > Skickat: den 8 juli 2020 19:00
> > Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org 
> > Ämne: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC2 release
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks Brennan!
> >
> > I used the checkrelease.sh script to check hashes, signatures, required
> > files, and that sim:nsh builds. See below for output.
> > Manually built and ran the release for sama5d2-xult:nsh on the
> > SAMA5D2-Xplained Ultra board.
> >
> > -adam
> >
> > ./tools/checkrelease.sh --gpg-output --release 9.1.0-RC2
> > Downloading release files from
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_incubator_nuttx_9.1.0-2DRC2_&d=DwIBaQ&c=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc&r=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE&m=oZ2MCXV_2M8re3VHg-eF15AFKOT7CkVs90gtDKT2reQ&s=23DUEX1JJmXVEmB_hBxacQ4VjgYQNc4qeLOQ--mUaTM&e=
> > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
> > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
> > gpg:using RSA key 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
> > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton "
> > [unknown]
> > gpg: aka "Brennan Ashton " [unknown]
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D 6280
> >  Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B 99E2
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
> >  OK: all required files exist in nuttx.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
> > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
> > gpg:using RSA key 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
> > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton "
> > [unknown]
> > gpg: aka "Brennan Ashton " [unknown]
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D 6280
> >  Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B 99E2
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
> >  OK: all required files exist in apps.
> >
> > Trying to build nuttx sim:nsh...
> >  OK: we were able to build sim:nsh
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:41 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Great work Brennan!
> > >
> > > My vote: +1
> > >
> > > $ ls -l nuttx*
> > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan 176192 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx
> > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan  69792 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.bin
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 alan alan 196384 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.hex
> > >
> > >
> > > $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
> > >textdata bss dec hex filename
> > >   69688 1042484   72276   11a54 nuttx
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On 7/8/20, Nathan Hartman  wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:40 PM Brennan Ashton 
> > > wrote:
> > > >> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time
> > > >> to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final
> > > >> release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
> > > >>
> > > >> This RC replaces RC1 which was never released due to files that were
> > > >> being stripped out by the releases process breaking the sim and z80
> > > >> targets.
> > > >
> > > > Summary:
> > > > +1 to release
> > > >
> > > > Development system: Linux
> > > >
> > > > Verified:
> > > > * Signatures
> > > > * SHA-512 sums
> > > > * Tarball contents match nuttx-9.1.0-RC2 tags, (except for expected
> > > >   differences: removal of asf.yaml, .gitignore, .github, and addition
> > > >   of.version). In particular, confirmed the asm files for sim and z80
> > > >   targets that were missing in RC1 are present in RC2.
> > > > * Incubating in artifact names
> > > > * LICENSE, NOTICE, README.txt, DISCLAIMER-W

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC2 release

2020-07-12 Thread Brennan Ashton
I was hoping that at least one of our mentors would vote on it here, but
I'm happy to move it along to the IPMC voting phases later today.

--Brennan

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 7:13 AM Abdelatif Guettouche <
abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:

> It's been 4 days, should we wait a bit longer for others before
> calling the IPMC vote?
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
>  wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > - Incubating in name
> > - Signature and hash OK
> > - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist
> > - Can build from source
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:44 PM Jerpelea, Alin 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > > I checked hashes, signatures, required files
> > > Manually build spresense nsh config and checked that all is ok
> > >
> > > Thanks Brennan!
> > >
> > > //Alin
> > > 
> > > Från: Adam Feuer 
> > > Skickat: den 8 juli 2020 19:00
> > > Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org 
> > > Ämne: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC2 release
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Thanks Brennan!
> > >
> > > I used the checkrelease.sh script to check hashes, signatures, required
> > > files, and that sim:nsh builds. See below for output.
> > > Manually built and ran the release for sama5d2-xult:nsh on the
> > > SAMA5D2-Xplained Ultra board.
> > >
> > > -adam
> > >
> > > ./tools/checkrelease.sh --gpg-output --release 9.1.0-RC2
> > > Downloading release files from
> > >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_incubator_nuttx_9.1.0-2DRC2_&d=DwIBaQ&c=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc&r=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE&m=oZ2MCXV_2M8re3VHg-eF15AFKOT7CkVs90gtDKT2reQ&s=23DUEX1JJmXVEmB_hBxacQ4VjgYQNc4qeLOQ--mUaTM&e=
> > > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
> > >
> > > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
> > > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
> > > gpg:using RSA key
> 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
> > > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton "
> > > [unknown]
> > > gpg: aka "Brennan Ashton "
> [unknown]
> > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > > owner.
> > > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D
> 6280
> > >  Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B
> 99E2
> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
> > >
> > > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
> > >  OK: all required files exist in nuttx.
> > >
> > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
> > >
> > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
> > > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
> > > gpg:using RSA key
> 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
> > > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton "
> > > [unknown]
> > > gpg: aka "Brennan Ashton "
> [unknown]
> > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > > owner.
> > > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D
> 6280
> > >  Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B
> 99E2
> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
> > >
> > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
> > >  OK: all required files exist in apps.
> > >
> > > Trying to build nuttx sim:nsh...
> > >  OK: we were able to build sim:nsh
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:41 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis <
> acas...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Great work Brennan!
> > > >
> > > > My vote: +1
> > > >
> > > > $ ls -l nuttx*
> > > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan 176192 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx
> > > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan  69792 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.bin
> > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 alan alan 196384 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.hex
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
> > > >textdata bss dec hex filename
> > > >   69688 1042484   72276   11a54 nuttx
> > > >
> > > > BR,
> > > >
> > > > Alan
> > > >
> > > > On 7/8/20, Nathan Hartman  wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:40 PM Brennan Ashton  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and
> it's time
> > > > >> to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek
> final
> > > > >> release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This RC replaces RC1 which was never released due to files that
> were
> > > > >> being stripped out by the releases process breaking the sim and
> z80
> > > > >> targets.
> > > > >
> >

Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC2 release

2020-07-12 Thread Brennan Ashton
I'll close this out with my vote and follow up with the result email

+1
- Incubating in name
- Signature and hash OK
- LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist
- Can build from source

functional tested on stm32f4discovery, sim, and x86_64 builds.

--Brennan

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 10:34 AM Brennan Ashton
 wrote:
>
> I was hoping that at least one of our mentors would vote on it here, but I'm 
> happy to move it along to the IPMC voting phases later today.
>
> --Brennan
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 7:13 AM Abdelatif Guettouche 
>  wrote:
>>
>> It's been 4 days, should we wait a bit longer for others before
>> calling the IPMC vote?
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
>>  wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> > - Incubating in name
>> > - Signature and hash OK
>> > - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist
>> > - Can build from source
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:44 PM Jerpelea, Alin  
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I checked hashes, signatures, required files
>> > > Manually build spresense nsh config and checked that all is ok
>> > >
>> > > Thanks Brennan!
>> > >
>> > > //Alin
>> > > 
>> > > Från: Adam Feuer 
>> > > Skickat: den 8 juli 2020 19:00
>> > > Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org 
>> > > Ämne: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC2 release
>> > >
>> > > +1
>> > >
>> > > Thanks Brennan!
>> > >
>> > > I used the checkrelease.sh script to check hashes, signatures, required
>> > > files, and that sim:nsh builds. See below for output.
>> > > Manually built and ran the release for sama5d2-xult:nsh on the
>> > > SAMA5D2-Xplained Ultra board.
>> > >
>> > > -adam
>> > >
>> > > ./tools/checkrelease.sh --gpg-output --release 9.1.0-RC2
>> > > Downloading release files from
>> > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_incubator_nuttx_9.1.0-2DRC2_&d=DwIBaQ&c=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc&r=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE&m=oZ2MCXV_2M8re3VHg-eF15AFKOT7CkVs90gtDKT2reQ&s=23DUEX1JJmXVEmB_hBxacQ4VjgYQNc4qeLOQ--mUaTM&e=
>> > > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
>> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
>> > >
>> > > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
>> > > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
>> > > gpg:using RSA key 
>> > > 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
>> > > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton "
>> > > [unknown]
>> > > gpg: aka "Brennan Ashton " [unknown]
>> > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> > > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
>> > > owner.
>> > > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D 
>> > > 6280
>> > >  Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B 
>> > > 99E2
>> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
>> > >
>> > > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
>> > >  OK: all required files exist in nuttx.
>> > >
>> > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
>> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
>> > >
>> > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
>> > > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
>> > > gpg:using RSA key 
>> > > 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
>> > > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton "
>> > > [unknown]
>> > > gpg: aka "Brennan Ashton " [unknown]
>> > > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
>> > > gpg:  There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
>> > > owner.
>> > > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D 
>> > > 6280
>> > >  Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B 
>> > > 99E2
>> > >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
>> > >
>> > > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
>> > >  OK: all required files exist in apps.
>> > >
>> > > Trying to build nuttx sim:nsh...
>> > >  OK: we were able to build sim:nsh
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:41 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis 
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Great work Brennan!
>> > > >
>> > > > My vote: +1
>> > > >
>> > > > $ ls -l nuttx*
>> > > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan 176192 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx
>> > > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan  69792 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.bin
>> > > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 alan alan 196384 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.hex
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
>> > > >textdata bss dec hex filename
>> > > >   69688 1042484   72276   11a54 nuttx
>> > > >
>> > > > BR,
>> > > >
>> > > > Alan
>> > > >
>> > > > On 7/8/20, Nathan Hartman  wrote:
>> > > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:40 PM Brennan Ashton 
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > > >> Apache NuttX (I

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 [RC2]

2020-07-12 Thread Brennan Ashton
Hi,

The vote closes now as over 72hr have passed. The vote PASSES with
6 (+6 non-binding) votes from the PPMC, 0 (+1 binding) vote from the
IPMC,
0 (+0 non-binding) votes from the developer community,
0 (+1 non-binding) vote from the other
and no further 0 or -1 votes.

The vote thread:
[1] 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r751f7ce05b1f0485b5dc9ca7bfb1c5f52abc5676fd81b9fb92910c64%40%3Cdev.nuttx.apache.org%3E

I will now bring the vote to gene...@incubator.apache.org to get
approval by the IPMC.
If this vote passes also, the release is accepted and will be
published.

Thanks,
Brennan Ashton



Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 [RC2]

2020-07-12 Thread Brennan Ashton
On Sun, Jul 12, 2020, 4:32 PM Brennan Ashton  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The vote closes now as over 72hr have passed. The vote PASSES with
> 6 (+6 non-binding) votes from the PPMC, 0 (+1 binding) vote from the
> IPMC,
> 0 (+0 non-binding) votes from the developer community,
> 0 (+1 non-binding) vote from the other
> and no further 0 or -1 votes.
>

It was bright to my attention that I miss categorize one of the votes as
being part of the PPMC when it was Dev Community. This does NOT change the
outcome.

5 (+5 non-binding) votes from the PPMC, 0 (+1 binding) vote from the
IPMC,
1 (+1 non-binding) votes from the developer community,
0 (+1 non-binding) vote from the other
and no further 0 or -1 votes.

Also the pony mail link also did not show two of the votes but they can be
seen here:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/nuttx-dev/202007.mbox/browser


Thanks for making sure I get it right.

--Brennan