It's been 4 days, should we wait a bit longer for others before
calling the IPMC vote?

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 1:46 PM Abdelatif Guettouche
<abdelatif.guettou...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
> - Incubating in name
> - Signature and hash OK
> - LICENSE, DISCLAIMER and NOTICE exist
> - Can build from source
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 6:44 PM Jerpelea, Alin <alin.jerpe...@sony.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> > I checked hashes, signatures, required files
> > Manually build spresense nsh config and checked that all is ok
> >
> > Thanks Brennan!
> >
> > //Alin
> > ________________________________
> > Från: Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io>
> > Skickat: den 8 juli 2020 19:00
> > Till: dev@nuttx.apache.org <dev@nuttx.apache.org>
> > Ämne: Re: [VOTE] Apache NuttX 9.1.0 (incubating) RC2 release
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks Brennan!
> >
> > I used the checkrelease.sh script to check hashes, signatures, required
> > files, and that sim:nsh builds. See below for output.
> > Manually built and ran the release for sama5d2-xult:nsh on the
> > SAMA5D2-Xplained Ultra board.
> >
> > -adam
> >
> > ./tools/checkrelease.sh --gpg-output --release 9.1.0-RC2
> > Downloading release files from
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_incubator_nuttx_9.1.0-2DRC2_&d=DwIBaQ&c=fP4tf--1dS0biCFlB0saz0I0kjO5v7-GLPtvShAo4cc&r=9PLdMPCoy-UxqQeL_7fkXjdHjEO-awBtN4-Wr8MqKGE&m=oZ2MCXV_2M8re3VHg-eF15AFKOT7CkVs90gtDKT2reQ&s=23DUEX1JJmXVEmB_hBxacQ4VjgYQNc4qeLOQ--mUaTM&e=
> > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
> > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
> > gpg:                using RSA key 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
> > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com>"
> > [unknown]
> > gpg:                 aka "Brennan Ashton <btash...@apache.org>" [unknown]
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D 6280
> >      Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B 99E2
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
> >  OK: all required files exist in nuttx.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512...
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz sha512 hash matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz GPG signature:
> > gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jul 2020 05:06:27 PM PDT
> > gpg:                using RSA key 66C4832A165ECC9354895A209750ED7E692B99E2
> > gpg: Good signature from "Brennan Ashton <bash...@brennanashton.com>"
> > [unknown]
> > gpg:                 aka "Brennan Ashton <btash...@apache.org>" [unknown]
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> > gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> > owner.
> > Primary key fingerprint: 3554 D784 58CE B695 4B02  0E12 E1B6 E30D B05D 6280
> >      Subkey fingerprint: 66C4 832A 165E CC93 5489  5A20 9750 ED7E 692B 99E2
> >  OK: apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz gpg signature matches.
> >
> > Checking apache-nuttx-apps-9.1.0-incubating.tar.gz for required files:
> >  OK: all required files exist in apps.
> >
> > Trying to build nuttx sim:nsh...
> >  OK: we were able to build sim:nsh
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:41 AM Alan Carvalho de Assis <acas...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Great work Brennan!
> > >
> > > My vote: +1
> > >
> > > $ ls -l nuttx*
> > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan 176192 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx
> > > -rwxrwxr-x 1 alan alan  69792 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.bin
> > > -rw-rw-r-- 1 alan alan 196384 Jul  8 12:33 nuttx.hex
> > >
> > >
> > > $ arm-none-eabi-size nuttx
> > >    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> > >   69688     104    2484   72276   11a54 nuttx
> > >
> > > BR,
> > >
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On 7/8/20, Nathan Hartman <hartman.nat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:40 PM Brennan Ashton <btash...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >> Apache NuttX (Incubating) 9.1.0 has been staged under [1] and it's time
> > > >> to vote on accepting it for release. If approved we will seek final
> > > >> release approval from the IPMC. Voting will be open for 72hr.
> > > >>
> > > >> This RC replaces RC1 which was never released due to files that were
> > > >> being stripped out by the releases process breaking the sim and z80
> > > >> targets.
> > > >
> > > > Summary:
> > > > +1 to release
> > > >
> > > > Development system: Linux
> > > >
> > > > Verified:
> > > > * Signatures
> > > > * SHA-512 sums
> > > > * Tarball contents match nuttx-9.1.0-RC2 tags, (except for expected
> > > >   differences: removal of asf.yaml, .gitignore, .github, and addition
> > > >   of.version). In particular, confirmed the asm files for sim and z80
> > > >   targets that were missing in RC1 are present in RC2.
> > > > * Incubating in artifact names
> > > > * LICENSE, NOTICE, README.txt, DISCLAIMER-WIP present in both tarballs
> > > > * Successfully build and run b-g474e-dpow1:nsh configuration (NEW in
> > > > NuttX-9.1)
> > > >
> > > > Dependencies:
> > > > * gcc-arm-none-eabi-7-2017-q4-major
> > > > * kconfig-conf from NuttX tools repository
> > > >
> > > > Other dependencies from Debian packages:
> > > > * binutils-dev 2.31.1-16
> > > > * bison 2:3.3.2.dfsg-1
> > > > * flex 2.6.4-6.2
> > > > * gperf 3.1-1
> > > > * libelf-dev 0.176-1.1
> > > > * libgmp-dev 2:6.1.2+dfsg-4
> > > > * libisl-dev 0.20-2
> > > > * libmpc-dev 1.1.0-1
> > > > * libmpfr-dev 4.0.2-1
> > > > * libncurses5-dev 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u2
> > > > * libusb-1.0-0-dev 2:1.0.22-2
> > > > * libusb-dev 2:0.1.12-32
> > > > * texinfo 6.5.0.dfsg.1-4+b1
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to everyone for making this release (candidate) possible!
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Nathan
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Adam Feuer <a...@starcat.io>

Reply via email to