Re: FlexUnit License
Thanks Erik... Now there are 3 libraries left: hamcrest - http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/mockolate-0.9.5.zip(License - https://github.com/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/blob/master/hamcrest/LICENSE) mockolate - http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/hamcrest-as3-flex-1.1.3.zip(License - https://github.com/drewbourne/mockolate/blob/master/LICENSE) Does anybody know if it's something special with hamcrest and mockalte library? flexunit1lib - https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit/raw/master/FlexUnit4Test/libs/FlexUnit1Lib.swc(License - ???) No clue what kind of license flexunit1lib has. Cyrill On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > The first two are OK, the third may need something extra, according to [1] > > EdB > > 1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Cyrill Zadra > wrote: > > Hi > > > > Just updated README file, which lists now all thirdparty libraries with > its > > licenses. There are a few Apache libraries, which can be automatically > > downloaded in my opinion. > > > > Are BSD, MIT and CPL 1.0 compatible with Apache? Do those libraries need > a > > prompt for a user to accept the license before download? > > > > Is there anybody who can help me here? > > > > Cyrill > > > > -- > Ix Multimedia Software > > Jan Luykenstraat 27 > 3521 VB Utrecht > > T. 06-51952295 > I. www.ixsoftware.nl >
Re: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer
Without doubt a key person to have in the group. Congrats and welcome Darrel. Your addition is great for Flex. Best, Carlos Rovira 2013/9/14 OmPrakash Muppirala > Congrats and welcome, Darrell! Thanks for all the contributions so far. > Looking forward to much more. > > Regards, > Om > > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Rushme Nayak >wrote: > > > congrats :) > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Mark Kessler > > wrote: > > > > > Congratulations :) > > > > > > -Mark > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Warm Regards, > > *Rush-me* > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es
Re: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer
Congrats Darrell, we appreciate your work! Tomislav On 14.9.2013. 4:31, OmPrakash Muppirala wrote: Congrats and welcome, Darrell! Thanks for all the contributions so far. Looking forward to much more. Regards, Om On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Rushme Nayak wrote: congrats :) On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Mark Kessler wrote: Congratulations :) -Mark -- Warm Regards, *Rush-me*
Re: FlexUnit License
Hamcrest looks like BSD, Mockolate looks like MIT. If you google the first line of the license it finds the same text. I didn't compare every line, so please double-check. The FlexUnitLIb.swc will need examining to find the classes within and hopefully the author of those classes. I'll try to find time to do that in about 14 hours if you haven't already. -Alex On 9/14/13 4:29 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote: >Thanks Erik... > >Now there are 3 libraries left: > >hamcrest - >http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/mockolate-0.9.5. >zip(License >- >https://github.com/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/blob/master/hamcrest/LICENSE) >mockolate - >http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/hamcrest-as3-fle >x-1.1.3.zip(License >- >https://github.com/drewbourne/mockolate/blob/master/LICENSE) > >Does anybody know if it's something special with hamcrest and mockalte >library? > >flexunit1lib - >https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit/raw/master/FlexUnit4Test/libs/FlexUni >t1Lib.swc(License >- ???) > >No clue what kind of license flexunit1lib has. > >Cyrill > > >On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Erik de Bruin wrote: > >> The first two are OK, the third may need something extra, according to >>[1] >> >> EdB >> >> 1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html >> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Cyrill Zadra >> wrote: >> > Hi >> > >> > Just updated README file, which lists now all thirdparty libraries >>with >> its >> > licenses. There are a few Apache libraries, which can be automatically >> > downloaded in my opinion. >> > >> > Are BSD, MIT and CPL 1.0 compatible with Apache? Do those libraries >>need >> a >> > prompt for a user to accept the license before download? >> > >> > Is there anybody who can help me here? >> > >> > Cyrill >> >> >> >> -- >> Ix Multimedia Software >> >> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >> 3521 VB Utrecht >> >> T. 06-51952295 >> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>
RE: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer
Congrats Darrell, hopefully with your help, our falcon will be able to fly :-)Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:43:36 -0700 > Subject: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer > > Hi, > > I am pleased to announce that the Project Management Committee (PMC) for > Apache Flex has invited Darrell Loverin to become a committer and he has > accepted. > > Darrell provided several key patches to the Falcon compiler over the past > few weeks. Darrell was a member of Adobe's ASC 2.0 team and therefore has > a better understanding of the Falcon code base than just about any other > committer. Before that he spent nearly 6 years on the Flex team, helping > to create the cross-versioning feature known as the Marshall Plan and > implementing the signed RSL feature, style modules, improving embedded > font handling and more. He therefore is familiar with ActionScript and > the MXMLC code base as well. > > Darrell and I first worked together in the late 1980's at Wang > Laboratories on a product called Freestyle. We both were at Lotus/IBM at > the same time for a while, Darrell on Lotus Notes while I worked on > various other products including cc:Mail. And after I joined Macromedia > to work on Flex, I encouraged Darrell to join me. > > Welcome Darrell! > > Alex Harui > Apache Flex PMC Chair >
Re: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer
Hi Darrell, Welcome to the club ;-) I look forward to working with you on Falcon. I hope to be able to find the time to get to know the code a bit better - maybe with a little help from you! Thanks, EdB On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > Congrats Darrell, hopefully with your help, our falcon will be able to fly > :-)Frédéric THOMAS > >> From: aha...@adobe.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:43:36 -0700 >> Subject: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer >> >> Hi, >> >> I am pleased to announce that the Project Management Committee (PMC) for >> Apache Flex has invited Darrell Loverin to become a committer and he has >> accepted. >> >> Darrell provided several key patches to the Falcon compiler over the past >> few weeks. Darrell was a member of Adobe's ASC 2.0 team and therefore has >> a better understanding of the Falcon code base than just about any other >> committer. Before that he spent nearly 6 years on the Flex team, helping >> to create the cross-versioning feature known as the Marshall Plan and >> implementing the signed RSL feature, style modules, improving embedded >> font handling and more. He therefore is familiar with ActionScript and >> the MXMLC code base as well. >> >> Darrell and I first worked together in the late 1980's at Wang >> Laboratories on a product called Freestyle. We both were at Lotus/IBM at >> the same time for a while, Darrell on Lotus Notes while I worked on >> various other products including cc:Mail. And after I joined Macromedia >> to work on Flex, I encouraged Darrell to join me. >> >> Welcome Darrell! >> >> Alex Harui >> Apache Flex PMC Chair >> > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry()
I would try doing a text comparison between your pom and the one
posted here, and see if it catches anything.
I'd do it for you, but outside my git commitsI don't have a good text
comparison tool.
http://stackoverflow.com/a/18713810/787202
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, mscharp wrote:
> Thanks Avi, here is what I have defined for the dependencies in my build tag,
> are there more/different dependencies I need to set?
>
>
>
> ${flex.groupId}
> compiler
> ${flex.sdk.version}
> pom
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> From: Avi Kessner [via Apache Flex Development]
> [mailto:ml-node+s247n29608...@n4.nabble.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:32 AM
> To: Scharp, Michael
> Subject: RE: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>
> You need to overide /set the dependencies in the plugin inside the build
> tags
> On 13 Sep 2013 08:35, "mscharp" <[hidden
> email]> wrote:
>
>> I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM.
>> I haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm
>> seeing are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against
>> 4.10.0.20130801?
>>
>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 is missing,
>> no dependency information available
>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/mxmlc/4.6.0.23201/mxmlc-4.6.0.23201.pom
>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:mxmlc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>> missing, no dependency information available
>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/digest/4.6.0.23201/digest-4.6.0.23201.pom
>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:digest:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>> missing, no dependency information available
>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/optimizer/4.6.0.23201/optimizer-4.6.0.23201.pom
>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:optimizer:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>> missing, no dependency information available
>> Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/asdoc/4.6.0.23201/asdoc-4.6.0.23201.pom
>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:asdoc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>> missing, no dependency information available
>> Downloading:
>> https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.CENSORED/com/adobe/flex/compiler/swcdepends/4.6.0.23201/swcdepends-4.6.0.23201.pom
>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:swcdepends:jar:4.6.0.23201
>> is missing, no dependency information available
>>
>> I can post poms if it helps.
>>
>> On a the issue of the RSLs, I have them working and I will post what I
>> have online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help them
>> if needed.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> From: [hidden email] [via
>> Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
>> [hidden email]]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM
>> To: Scharp, Michael
>> Subject: AW: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
>> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>>
>> I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-)
>>
>> Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think
>> that would be a good idea.
>> If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be
>> possible as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if you are
>> talking about modules in the same maven build, I would stronly suggest not
>> to try that.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
>> Von: Avi Kessner [[hidden
>> email]]
>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:24
>> An: [hidden email]
>> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
>> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>>
>> If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect
>> that to cause conflicts?
>> On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "[hidden
>> email]" <[hidden
>> email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you
>> > throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of
>> Apache
>> > Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains,
>> if
>> > you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency.
>> > Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like.
>> >
>> > The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As the Flex
>> > RSLs for an application were only loaded once no matter what URL you
>> > visited and it usually even survived a Cache cleanup. As soon as a SWZ
>> was
>> > loaded, the Flashplayer sort of installed it locally and as soon as an
>> > application needed it again, it simply loaded it without having to
>> download
>> > it again.
>> >
>> > The reason for
Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and getAdvancedTelemetry()
I forgot to mention that from what I can see everything looks correct,
so I'm guessing there is some small typo or something.
brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
and the number 47
On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Avi Kessner wrote:
> I would try doing a text comparison between your pom and the one
> posted here, and see if it catches anything.
> I'd do it for you, but outside my git commitsI don't have a good text
> comparison tool.
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/a/18713810/787202
> brought to you by the letters A, V, and I
> and the number 47
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:57 PM, mscharp wrote:
>> Thanks Avi, here is what I have defined for the dependencies in my build
>> tag, are there more/different dependencies I need to set?
>>
>>
>>
>> ${flex.groupId}
>> compiler
>> ${flex.sdk.version}
>> pom
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> From: Avi Kessner [via Apache Flex Development]
>> [mailto:ml-node+s247n29608...@n4.nabble.com]
>> Sent: Friday, September 13, 2013 6:32 AM
>> To: Scharp, Michael
>> Subject: RE: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
>> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>>
>> You need to overide /set the dependencies in the plugin inside the build
>> tags
>> On 13 Sep 2013 08:35, "mscharp" <[hidden
>> email]> wrote:
>>
>>> I've updated my projects to start building with your 6.0.1 version of FM.
>>> I haven't had a chance to really get into it yet, but the first things I'm
>>> seeing are these warnings. Any idea why, as I'm building against
>>> 4.10.0.20130801?
>>>
>>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex:compiler:pom:4.6.0.23201 is missing,
>>> no dependency information available
>>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/mxmlc/4.6.0.23201/mxmlc-4.6.0.23201.pom
>>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:mxmlc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>>> missing, no dependency information available
>>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/digest/4.6.0.23201/digest-4.6.0.23201.pom
>>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:digest:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>>> missing, no dependency information available
>>> Downloading: https://repo. CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/optimizer/4.6.0.23201/optimizer-4.6.0.23201.pom
>>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:optimizer:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>>> missing, no dependency information available
>>> Downloading: https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0. CENSORED
>>> /com/adobe/flex/compiler/asdoc/4.6.0.23201/asdoc-4.6.0.23201.pom
>>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:asdoc:jar:4.6.0.23201 is
>>> missing, no dependency information available
>>> Downloading:
>>> https://repo.CENSORED.com/content/groups/level0.CENSORED/com/adobe/flex/compiler/swcdepends/4.6.0.23201/swcdepends-4.6.0.23201.pom
>>> [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flex.compiler:swcdepends:jar:4.6.0.23201
>>> is missing, no dependency information available
>>>
>>> I can post poms if it helps.
>>>
>>> On a the issue of the RSLs, I have them working and I will post what I
>>> have online so that anyone else wondering will have something to help them
>>> if needed.
>>>
>>> Michael
>>>
>>> From: [hidden email] [via
>>> Apache Flex Development] [mailto:
>>> [hidden email]]
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 10:32 AM
>>> To: Scharp, Michael
>>> Subject: AW: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
>>> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>>>
>>> I would expect the thing to blow up in my face ... yes :-)
>>>
>>> Cause you would be mixing different Versions of libs ... I don't think
>>> that would be a good idea.
>>> If you however want to use a library (swc/rsl) however that should be
>>> possible as Long as the rsl/swc doesn't rely on changed API. But if you are
>>> talking about modules in the same maven build, I would stronly suggest not
>>> to try that.
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>
>>> Von: Avi Kessner [[hidden
>>> email]]
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2013 18:24
>>> An: [hidden email]
>>> Betreff: Re: AW: FlexMojos 6, Flex sdk 4.10.0.20130801, and
>>> getAdvancedTelemetry()
>>>
>>> If one pom file in a project uses FM 6 and another uses 3 would you expect
>>> that to cause conflicts?
>>> On 12 Sep 2013 19:19, "[hidden
>>> email]" <[hidden
>>> email]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Well actually FM should build your application with any mavenized FDK you
>>> > throw at it. Unless something has changed in more recent Versions of
>>> Apache
>>> > Flex. FM automatically uses the Compiler Version it was compiled agains,
>>> if
>>> > you don't explicitly fix a Version by using the plugin dependency.
>>> > Otherwise you're free to use whatever Version you like.
>>> >
>>> > The benefit of signed RSLs was even bigger (in my oppinion). As
RE: [Intaller] Speed up download
I just create a simple AIR application to download files from a server (with resuming capability detection / actions) using workers, if no one has objections, I will integrate this feature to the Installer. https://github.com/doublefx/downloadFileWorker -Fred -Message d'origine- De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 20:21 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: [Intaller] Speed up download Another thing could be to use workers to computes md5 and parallel downloads, if no one is interested in doing, to save me time for later, I will delay the maven stuffs and try to implement: - multipart downloads - workers - artifacts caching Btw, @Om, you didn't answered because you haven't seen or because you can't, in the "Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer" thread ? --- Would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ? I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it. I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side: - Maven detection - Process user choice - Error detection - -Fred [1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/
Re: [Intaller] Speed up download
Cool! EdB On Saturday, September 14, 2013, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > I just create a simple AIR application to download files from a server > (with > resuming capability detection / actions) using workers, if no one has > objections, I will integrate this feature to the Installer. > > https://github.com/doublefx/downloadFileWorker > > -Fred > > -Message d'origine- > De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com ] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 20:21 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : RE: [Intaller] Speed up download > > Another thing could be to use workers to computes md5 and parallel > downloads, if no one is interested in doing, to save me time for later, I > will delay the maven stuffs and try to implement: > > - multipart downloads > - workers > - artifacts caching > > Btw, @Om, you didn't answered because you haven't seen or because you > can't, > in the "Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer" thread ? > > --- > Would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ? > > I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it. > > I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side: > - Maven detection > - Process user choice > - Error detection > - > > -Fred > > [1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/ > > -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
RE: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer
Hi, Thanks Darrell for taking the time to get involved. The project is building up an impressive PMC team! Thanks to the rest of the PMC members as well :-) Regards, Sugan -Original Message- From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Sent: 13 September 2013 10:44 PM To: dev@flex.apache.org Subject: Welcome Darrell Loverin as Apache Flex Committer Hi, I am pleased to announce that the Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Flex has invited Darrell Loverin to become a committer and he has accepted. Darrell provided several key patches to the Falcon compiler over the past few weeks. Darrell was a member of Adobe's ASC 2.0 team and therefore has a better understanding of the Falcon code base than just about any other committer. Before that he spent nearly 6 years on the Flex team, helping to create the cross-versioning feature known as the Marshall Plan and implementing the signed RSL feature, style modules, improving embedded font handling and more. He therefore is familiar with ActionScript and the MXMLC code base as well. Darrell and I first worked together in the late 1980's at Wang Laboratories on a product called Freestyle. We both were at Lotus/IBM at the same time for a while, Darrell on Lotus Notes while I worked on various other products including cc:Mail. And after I joined Macromedia to work on Flex, I encouraged Darrell to join me. Welcome Darrell! Alex Harui Apache Flex PMC Chair
Re: [Intaller] Speed up download
Hi, How will we get this to work for the Linux installer? Justin On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote: > I just create a simple AIR application to download files from a server > (with > resuming capability detection / actions) using workers, if no one has > objections, I will integrate this feature to the Installer. > > https://github.com/doublefx/downloadFileWorker > > -Fred > > -Message d'origine- > De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] > Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 20:21 > À : dev@flex.apache.org > Objet : RE: [Intaller] Speed up download > > Another thing could be to use workers to computes md5 and parallel > downloads, if no one is interested in doing, to save me time for later, I > will delay the maven stuffs and try to implement: > > - multipart downloads > - workers > - artifacts caching > > Btw, @Om, you didn't answered because you haven't seen or because you > can't, > in the "Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer" thread ? > > --- > Would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ? > > I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it. > > I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side: > - Maven detection > - Process user choice > - Error detection > - > > -Fred > > [1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/ > >
RE: [Intaller] Speed up download
Can't we use conditional compilation ? Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 08:00:25 +1000 > Subject: Re: [Intaller] Speed up download > From: jus...@classsoftware.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Hi, > > How will we get this to work for the Linux installer? > > Justin > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Frédéric THOMAS > wrote: > > > I just create a simple AIR application to download files from a server > > (with > > resuming capability detection / actions) using workers, if no one has > > objections, I will integrate this feature to the Installer. > > > > https://github.com/doublefx/downloadFileWorker > > > > -Fred > > > > -Message d'origine- > > De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] > > Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 20:21 > > À : dev@flex.apache.org > > Objet : RE: [Intaller] Speed up download > > > > Another thing could be to use workers to computes md5 and parallel > > downloads, if no one is interested in doing, to save me time for later, I > > will delay the maven stuffs and try to implement: > > > > - multipart downloads > > - workers > > - artifacts caching > > > > Btw, @Om, you didn't answered because you haven't seen or because you > > can't, > > in the "Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer" thread ? > > > > --- > > Would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ? > > > > I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it. > > > > I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side: > > - Maven detection > > - Process user choice > > - Error detection > > - > > > > -Fred > > > > [1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/ > > > >
RE: [Intaller] Speed up download
On Sep 14, 2013 3:40 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > > Can't we use conditional compilation ? This could help as well: https://github.com/jcward/AS3-Worker-Compat Thanks, Om > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 08:00:25 +1000 > > Subject: Re: [Intaller] Speed up download > > From: jus...@classsoftware.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > Hi, > > > > How will we get this to work for the Linux installer? > > > > Justin > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > > > I just create a simple AIR application to download files from a server > > > (with > > > resuming capability detection / actions) using workers, if no one has > > > objections, I will integrate this feature to the Installer. > > > > > > https://github.com/doublefx/downloadFileWorker > > > > > > -Fred > > > > > > -Message d'origine- > > > De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] > > > Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 20:21 > > > À : dev@flex.apache.org > > > Objet : RE: [Intaller] Speed up download > > > > > > Another thing could be to use workers to computes md5 and parallel > > > downloads, if no one is interested in doing, to save me time for later, I > > > will delay the maven stuffs and try to implement: > > > > > > - multipart downloads > > > - workers > > > - artifacts caching > > > > > > Btw, @Om, you didn't answered because you haven't seen or because you > > > can't, > > > in the "Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer" thread ? > > > > > > --- > > > Would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ? > > > > > > I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it. > > > > > > I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side: > > > - Maven detection > > > - Process user choice > > > - Error detection > > > - > > > > > > -Fred > > > > > > [1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/ > > > > > > >
RE: [Intaller] Speed up download
Thanks, will have look at it tomorrow. Frédéric THOMAS > Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 15:58:02 -0700 > Subject: RE: [Intaller] Speed up download > From: bigosma...@gmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > On Sep 14, 2013 3:40 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote: > > > > Can't we use conditional compilation ? > > This could help as well: https://github.com/jcward/AS3-Worker-Compat > > Thanks, > Om > > > > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 08:00:25 +1000 > > > Subject: Re: [Intaller] Speed up download > > > From: jus...@classsoftware.com > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > How will we get this to work for the Linux installer? > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Frédéric THOMAS < > webdoubl...@hotmail.com>wrote: > > > > > > > I just create a simple AIR application to download files from a server > > > > (with > > > > resuming capability detection / actions) using workers, if no one has > > > > objections, I will integrate this feature to the Installer. > > > > > > > > https://github.com/doublefx/downloadFileWorker > > > > > > > > -Fred > > > > > > > > -Message d'origine- > > > > De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] > > > > Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 20:21 > > > > À : dev@flex.apache.org > > > > Objet : RE: [Intaller] Speed up download > > > > > > > > Another thing could be to use workers to computes md5 and parallel > > > > downloads, if no one is interested in doing, to save me time for > later, I > > > > will delay the maven stuffs and try to implement: > > > > > > > > - multipart downloads > > > > - workers > > > > - artifacts caching > > > > > > > > Btw, @Om, you didn't answered because you haven't seen or because you > > > > can't, > > > > in the "Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer" thread ? > > > > > > > > --- > > > > Would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ? > > > > > > > > I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it. > > > > > > > > I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side: > > > > - Maven detection > > > > - Process user choice > > > > - Error detection > > > > - > > > > > > > > -Fred > > > > > > > > [1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/ > > > > > > > > > >
Re: UI Designer ("Design View" replacement)
Igor, That looks good, but since it looks like it runs in Chrome (not available at my work and would be a nightmare trying to get it), it's just not an option. :( -Eric On 9/12/2013 8:58 AM, Igor Costa wrote: Eric are you trying to reach this https://github.com/igorcosta/ApacheFlexUIBuilder ? Actually I'm still working on a more polish version later this summer in southern hemisphere. I think it will fit on the next release of FalconJS Best Regards Igor Costa www.igorcosta.com www.igorcosta.org On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Sebastian Mohr wrote: @Eric ... to your initial question. For rapid prototyping try to consider using FlashBuilder 4.6 with "Design View" or Flash Catalyst CS5.5 to generate your visual SkinnableContainers or SkinnableComponents. Upgrading your visual prototype to Apache Flex 4.10 can be done thereafter. At least, this is how I do it in my day to day practice as Flex Interaction Designer. -- Sebastian (PPMC) Interaction Designer Looking for a Login Example with Apache Flex? Please check out this code: http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/LoginExample On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Eric wrote: I wasn't able to find anything recent about a UI design tool for Apache Flex. There seemed to be some discussion of this awhile back, but how far did it get? Are there any links to a project or source? Sorry if this has been brought up 100 times already. I think a tool like this will be crucial (in "the enterprise space") to help power the widespread adoption that Falcon will hopefully bring.
Re: UI Designer ("Design View" replacement)
Yeah my workflow is similar to what Nick described. Our UI design tends to be 90% done before integration or much code is written. But we've never had design view totally "break" either; perhaps I'm misunderstanding what people mean by that, or we've been lucky. For most of our UIs, layout at runtime--other than having a few V/HBoxes autosize or whatever--it's just not ever going to be feasible. You'll have to trust me on that I guess. We rarely use repeaters or components instantiated in ActionScript & added dynamically, and I agree DV isn't even needed in those cases. (Sometimes I've worked around it if needed, such as adding those dynamic components to an explicit dimension scrolling container.) Anyway, as for figuring out an ideal replacement tool... FB 4.6 won't be around forever, and Adobe already makes it hard if not impossible to even purchase. It sounds like the only option for us (@work) is to continue using FB 4.0. Which means I'm uncertain which SDK (Adobe or Apache) I'd choose next time a new project comes along. I'm not sure how I feel about doing initial design under an Adobe SDK and then upgrading to Apache and permanently losing design view conveniences. Concerned about O&M efficiency for the future. I would have considered jumping on board to assist an existing OSS designer tool project (this is why I started the thread), but I doubt my commitment taking on such a project. Need to think on this a bit. -Eric On 9/12/2013 12:08 PM, John Cunliffe wrote: You might wanna use a reflection tool to get it right at runtime. Design views are not needed for this and don't work for generative frameworks either. Reflection always works. Am 04.09.2013 16:30 schrieb "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" : That's a bit harsh. I used design view all the time to do basic layout before I did any coding. You could quickly prototype your app and get things laid out correctly before you hooked it up and "broke design view." Nothing frustrated me more than having to recompile my app every time I have to make a pixel adjustment,,, Getting it right first was key. -Nick On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Nick Collins wrote: I would respectfully disagree. Every Flex engineer worth their salt that I have ever worked with dumped the design view after about week 3 of learning Flex. Typically after that point when you start integrating your code with real live data sources that are driving your UI the design view rapidly becomes worthless. You start drawing your UI dynamically based on the data that is provided, learn that the demos they do with data binding will never be used in the real world because of the performance hits you get by just putting a [Bindable] on everything without custom events tied to them, etc. and the design view would just fall apart with those real world scenarios. On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Eric wrote: I wasn't able to find anything recent about a UI design tool for Apache Flex. There seemed to be some discussion of this awhile back, but how far did it get? Are there any links to a project or source? Sorry if this has been brought up 100 times already. I think a tool like this will be crucial (in "the enterprise space") to help power the widespread adoption that Falcon will hopefully bring.
Re: FlexUnit License
Labriola probably will know for sure, but it looks like it is bsd http://sourceforge.net/adobe/flexunit/wiki/License/ -Alex On 9/14/13 7:53 AM, "Alex Harui" wrote: >Hamcrest looks like BSD, Mockolate looks like MIT. If you google the >first line of the license it finds the same text. I didn't compare every >line, so please double-check. > >The FlexUnitLIb.swc will need examining to find the classes within and >hopefully the author of those classes. > >I'll try to find time to do that in about 14 hours if you haven't already. > >-Alex > >On 9/14/13 4:29 AM, "Cyrill Zadra" wrote: > >>Thanks Erik... >> >>Now there are 3 libraries left: >> >>hamcrest - >>http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/mockolate-0.9.5 >>. >>zip(License >>- >>https://github.com/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/blob/master/hamcrest/LICENSE) >>mockolate - >>http://cloud.github.com/downloads/drewbourne/hamcrest-as3/hamcrest-as3-fl >>e >>x-1.1.3.zip(License >>- >>https://github.com/drewbourne/mockolate/blob/master/LICENSE) >> >>Does anybody know if it's something special with hamcrest and mockalte >>library? >> >>flexunit1lib - >>https://github.com/flexunit/flexunit/raw/master/FlexUnit4Test/libs/FlexUn >>i >>t1Lib.swc(License >>- ???) >> >>No clue what kind of license flexunit1lib has. >> >>Cyrill >> >> >>On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Erik de Bruin >>wrote: >> >>> The first two are OK, the third may need something extra, according to >>>[1] >>> >>> EdB >>> >>> 1: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Cyrill Zadra >>> wrote: >>> > Hi >>> > >>> > Just updated README file, which lists now all thirdparty libraries >>>with >>> its >>> > licenses. There are a few Apache libraries, which can be >>>automatically >>> > downloaded in my opinion. >>> > >>> > Are BSD, MIT and CPL 1.0 compatible with Apache? Do those libraries >>>need >>> a >>> > prompt for a user to accept the license before download? >>> > >>> > Is there anybody who can help me here? >>> > >>> > Cyrill >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>> T. 06-51952295 >>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>> >
