Re: [VOTE] Apache Flex SDK 4.14.0 RC1

[Pierre Smits]

Hi Justin,

It seems like you have sent the email to the wrong mailing list.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

*ORRTIZ.COM *
Services & Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail & Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Sorry -1 binding due to LICENSE/NOTICE issues,  locale issue and the RSL
> issue
>
> I checked (on OSX):
> - md5 and signatures correct
> - LICENSE and NOTICE have issues ( see below)
> - No unexpected binaries in source
> - All source files have Apache headers
> - Can compile from source
> - Can create a usable SDK
> - Simple desktop, mobile and browser apps work
> - Simple desktop RSL app fails to work with error:
> Error #2032: Stream Error. URL: file:///Users/justinmclean/Documents/Adobe
> Flash Builder 4.6/SimpleRSLTest/bin-debug/textLayout_20150121.swf
> Looks like the file is question is named "textLayout_4.14.0.20150121.swf"
> not the expected "textLayout_20150121.swf".
>
> I'm yet to test any of the new mobile skins, flat theme or new component.
>
> The source LICENSE file is missing a few things I think:
>
> Noticed this (and variations of):
> This is SVG, a language for describing two-dimensional graphics in XML.
>  Copyright 2001, 2002 W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved.
>
> In these files:
>
> modules/thirdparty/batik/resources/org/apache/flex/forks/batik/dom/svg/resources/*.mod
>
> modules/thirdparty/batik/resources/org/apache/flex/forks/batik/dom/svg/resources/*.dtd
>
> And this "Copyright (c) 1999 World Wide Web Consortium" in:
> modules/thirdparty/batik/sources/org/w3c/css/sac/LexicalUnit.java
>
> We have batik mentioned in NOTICE but I'm not sure that's correct (unless
> license headers were also changed). Shouldn't we have the license pointers
> in LICENSE instead as W3C licenses are permissive license? [1] The W3C
> software and document licenses [2][3] don't require any thing added to
> NOTICE  as far as I can tell (not 100% sure) but do require a copy and/or
> link to their LICENSE which we are not doing in the source package.
>
> Other stuff:
> - During the build it prompts for OSMF which it doesn't need to.
> - " ant -f installer.xml" doesn't respect locale and forces en_US
> - The REAMDE section on dependancies needs a little fixing
> - Missing CONTRIBUTORS file
> - Suggest LICENSE.base, LICENSE.bin, NOTICE.asc, NOTICE.base, NOTICE.bin
> either be moved out of the base directory so there or not included in the
> source release no confusion re which license actually applies
> - Missing windows version of adl and adt from bin directory this means the
> SDK is not portable. This may be an issue to some people as discussed
> previously on the list.
> - Utils display wrong copyright year eg compc displays "Copyright 2014 The
> Apache Software Foundation."
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1 http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> 2. http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231
> 3.
> http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231.html
>
>
>

Re: A maturity model for Apache projects

[Dave Fisher]

Hi -

CD20 should refer to the source code repository existing in Apache 
Infrastructure.

"The project's code is easily discoverable and publicly accessible from an ASF 
hosted repository."

Regards,
Dave

On Jan 20, 2015, at 7:50 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:

> Sure, this should be on our web site, thanks Bertrand for writing this 
> maturity model.
> 
> Antoine
> On Jan 20, 2015, at 9:44 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz  
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Thanks to everybody who contributed, I think
>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ApacheProjectMaturityModel is ready
>> for prime time, as a first version that might still evolve.
>> 
>> (except maybe Justin's comments about CD10, let's see how you like the
>> current wording)
>> 
>> I suggest moving it under https://www.apache.org/dev/ alongside
>> https://www.apache.org/dev/project-requirements which is more about
>> processes, and link both documents to each other. WDYT?
>> 
>> -Bertrand
> 

Re: non-technical volunteer?

[Lewis John Mcgibbney]

Hi Claude,
Please accept my apologies for delay. I have been extremely busy.
Yes definitely there are opportunities or such participation.
I'm CC'ing in dev@community list in the hope that someone can chime in and
potentially find a useful and interesting position for your wife to spend
her time.
I've also CC'd Melissa Warnkin the Foundation's EA. Melissa usually has
excellent ideas and also potential areas where she could use a hand.
Thank you kindly folks for any feedback to Claude.
Lewis


On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Claude Warren  wrote:

>
> Lewis,
>
> Are there any volunteer positions for people that want to assist with
> Apache convention planning but need to do it remotely.  My wife is
> interested in exploring such volunteer positions, though she is also open
> to other opportunities.  Is there some place that lists non-technical
> opportunities?
>
> Claude
> --
> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
> 
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
>



-- 
*Lewis*

Re: Apache Events information is out-of-date

[sebb]

On 22 January 2015 at 00:08, David Crossley  wrote:
> (I am not sure where this belongs, so starting here.
> Would someone else please handle it, as i do not have the time.)
>
> Many Apache project websites refer directly to the
> "current event" information, so that their websites will
> automatically promote the next event without the projects
> needing to do anything.
>
> See http://www.apache.org/events/
>
> Those were recently updated (2014-12-30). However there seems to be
> a glitch, and the images are still the old ones.

I think that's because there are as yet no new logos.
These should be at:

http://www.apache.org/ads/ApacheCon/

I asked about this on dev@community mid December.

I have no graphics ability, but I'm happy to update the various files
once the logos are available.


> -David