Hi Justin, It seems like you have sent the email to the wrong mailing list.
Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry -1 binding due to LICENSE/NOTICE issues, locale issue and the RSL > issue > > I checked (on OSX): > - md5 and signatures correct > - LICENSE and NOTICE have issues ( see below) > - No unexpected binaries in source > - All source files have Apache headers > - Can compile from source > - Can create a usable SDK > - Simple desktop, mobile and browser apps work > - Simple desktop RSL app fails to work with error: > Error #2032: Stream Error. URL: file:///Users/justinmclean/Documents/Adobe > Flash Builder 4.6/SimpleRSLTest/bin-debug/textLayout_20150121.swf > Looks like the file is question is named "textLayout_4.14.0.20150121.swf" > not the expected "textLayout_20150121.swf". > > I'm yet to test any of the new mobile skins, flat theme or new component. > > The source LICENSE file is missing a few things I think: > > Noticed this (and variations of): > This is SVG, a language for describing two-dimensional graphics in XML. > Copyright 2001, 2002 W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. > > In these files: > > modules/thirdparty/batik/resources/org/apache/flex/forks/batik/dom/svg/resources/*.mod > > modules/thirdparty/batik/resources/org/apache/flex/forks/batik/dom/svg/resources/*.dtd > > And this "Copyright (c) 1999 World Wide Web Consortium" in: > modules/thirdparty/batik/sources/org/w3c/css/sac/LexicalUnit.java > > We have batik mentioned in NOTICE but I'm not sure that's correct (unless > license headers were also changed). Shouldn't we have the license pointers > in LICENSE instead as W3C licenses are permissive license? [1] The W3C > software and document licenses [2][3] don't require any thing added to > NOTICE as far as I can tell (not 100% sure) but do require a copy and/or > link to their LICENSE which we are not doing in the source package. > > Other stuff: > - During the build it prompts for OSMF which it doesn't need to. > - " ant -f installer.xml" doesn't respect locale and forces en_US > - The REAMDE section on dependancies needs a little fixing > - Missing CONTRIBUTORS file > - Suggest LICENSE.base, LICENSE.bin, NOTICE.asc, NOTICE.base, NOTICE.bin > either be moved out of the base directory so there or not included in the > source release no confusion re which license actually applies > - Missing windows version of adl and adt from bin directory this means the > SDK is not portable. This may be an issue to some people as discussed > previously on the list. > - Utils display wrong copyright year eg compc displays "Copyright 2014 The > Apache Software Foundation." > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1 http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps > 2. http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-software-20021231 > 3. > http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231.html > > >
