CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I've been testing the 4.2 release of CloudStack using Virtual Box and have 
noticed a need to allocate significantly more memory to the VM.  Previously I 
would use a CentOS VM with 1 GB of RAM for the installation but then drop the 
memory to 512MB, leaving plenty of RAM on the host machine to then stand up a 
XenServer VM or a KVM VM etc.

I initially had problems logging into 4.2 after a clean install, and discovered 
that only by increasing the memory to 2GB could I get the system to function.

I am quite shocked that the memory footprint has increased 400% between 
releases.  Obviously for a real production system, allocating more than 2GB or 
RAM to CloudStack is not an issue, but it does make standing up a simple test 
environment in Virtual Box more difficult.

Does anyone have ideas why this has increased and is it something that should 
be looked at.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

[Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align]

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
18/19 September, 
Bangalore<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
02/03 October, 
London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
13/14 November, 
London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
27/28 November, 
Bangalore<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
08/09 January 2014, 
London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>






This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

[Geoff Higginbottom]

All,

Thanks for all the replies, now a simple question, what do I need to change to 
test it?

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 September 2013 20:29
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

If I recall, we were able to start running it in devcloud again with only 1G of 
memory allocated to dom0 just a few weeks after the initial spring merge. I 
just think the default was never set back.

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Chiradeep Vittal 
 wrote:
> I believe Darren's proposed Spring refactor will help greatly.
>
> On 9/26/13 7:41 AM, "Marcus Sorensen"  wrote:
>
>>I think its an artifact from the Spring stuff six months ago. We can
>>probably decrease that in the default tomcat conf now.
>>On Sep 26, 2013 6:11 AM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
>>geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  I¹ve been testing the 4.2 release of CloudStack using Virtual Box
>>> and have noticed a need to allocate significantly more memory to the VM.
>>> Previously I would use a CentOS VM with 1 GB of RAM for the
>>> installation but then drop the memory to 512MB, leaving plenty of
>>> RAM on the host machine to then stand up a XenServer VM or a KVM VM etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I initially had problems logging into 4.2 after a clean install, and
>>>discovered that only by increasing the memory to 2GB could I get the
>>>system  to function.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am quite shocked that the memory footprint has increased 400%
>>>between  releases.  Obviously for a real production system,
>>>allocating more than 2GB  or RAM to CloudStack is not an issue, but
>>>it does make standing up a simple  test environment in Virtual Box
>>>more difficult.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone have ideas why this has increased and is it something
>>> that should be looked at.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> *CTO / Cloud Architect*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [image: Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 <+442036030542> | S: +44 20 3603 0540
>>><+442036030540>| M:
>>> +447968161581
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com |
>>>Twitter:@shapeblue<https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>>>
>>> 18/19 September,
>>>Bangalore<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-cours
>>>e/>
>>>
>>> 02/03 October,
>>>London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
>>>
>>> 13/14 November,
>>>London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
>>>
>>> 27/28 November,
>>>Bangalore<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-cours
>>>e/>
>>>
>>> 08/09 January 2014,
>>>London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
>>> **
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>>intended  solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
>>>addressed. Any views or  opinions expressed are solely those of the
>>>author and do not necessarily  represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or
>>>related companies. If you are not the  intended recipient of this
>>>email, you must neither take any action based  upon its contents, nor
>>>copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender  if you believe
>>>you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a  company
>>>incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>>>company incorporated in India and is operated under license from
>>>Shape Blue  Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company
>>>incorporated in Brasil  and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>>>Ltd. ShapeBlue is a  registered trademark.
>>>
>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Marcus, Chiradeep,

You've both made reference to the 'Spring Refactor', any chance you can let me 
know how I go about changing this so I can run CloudStack on a 1GB (or less) 
foot print, rather than the current 2GB.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-----
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 27 September 2013 08:57
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

All,

Thanks for all the replies, now a simple question, what do I need to change to 
test it?

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 26 September 2013 20:29
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

If I recall, we were able to start running it in devcloud again with only 1G of 
memory allocated to dom0 just a few weeks after the initial spring merge. I 
just think the default was never set back.

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Chiradeep Vittal 
 wrote:
> I believe Darren's proposed Spring refactor will help greatly.
>
> On 9/26/13 7:41 AM, "Marcus Sorensen"  wrote:
>
>>I think its an artifact from the Spring stuff six months ago. We can
>>probably decrease that in the default tomcat conf now.
>>On Sep 26, 2013 6:11 AM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
>>geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  I¹ve been testing the 4.2 release of CloudStack using Virtual Box
>>> and have noticed a need to allocate significantly more memory to the VM.
>>> Previously I would use a CentOS VM with 1 GB of RAM for the
>>> installation but then drop the memory to 512MB, leaving plenty of
>>> RAM on the host machine to then stand up a XenServer VM or a KVM VM etc.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I initially had problems logging into 4.2 after a clean install, and
>>>discovered that only by increasing the memory to 2GB could I get the
>>>system  to function.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I am quite shocked that the memory footprint has increased 400%
>>>between  releases.  Obviously for a real production system,
>>>allocating more than 2GB  or RAM to CloudStack is not an issue, but
>>>it does make standing up a simple  test environment in Virtual Box
>>>more difficult.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Does anyone have ideas why this has increased and is it something
>>> that should be looked at.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> *CTO / Cloud Architect*
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Marcus,

Thanks for the pointer.

After some experimentation, I was able to get the system to function with 1GB 
or RAM, but no less.

I changed the -XX:PermSize / -XX:MaxPermSize settings from 512 / 800 to 256 / 
512.

ORIGINAL
JAVA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=45219 
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false 
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Xmx2g -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError 
-XX:HeapDumpPath=/var/log/cloudstack/management/ -XX:PermSize=512M 
-XX:MaxPermSize=800m"

NEW
JAVA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=45219 
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false 
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false -Xmx2g -XX:+HeapDumpOnOutOfMemoryError 
-XX:HeapDumpPath=/var/log/cloudstack/management/ -XX:PermSize=256M 
-XX:MaxPermSize=512m"

I was actually able to drop these values lower, but the CSMAN VM still needs 
1GB of RAM regardless so something else must be hogging the RAM.

Whilst this now works with a 1GB Memory Allowance for the CloudStack Management 
Server, it is still x2 what CloudStack 4.1 needed.

For building test environments on a Laptop in Virtual Box with a separate Host 
VM such as XenServer 6.2, every MB of RAM is critical.  Fortunately I have lots 
of real hardware at my disposal but not everyone does hence my quest to be able 
to build a test environment on a Latptop with only 4GB of RAM.

If anyone on the DEV List has any ideas how we can get CloudStack 4.2 to run on 
512 MB of RAM like 4.1 did I would be happy to test their theories.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 30 September 2013 16:17
To: Geoff Higginbottom
Cc: chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements

Edit JAVA_OPTS in /etc/cloudstack/management/tomcat6.conf (or whatever file 
your system uses) and adjust the memory settings as desired.

On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 4:43 AM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:
> Marcus, Chiradeep,
>
> You've both made reference to the 'Spring Refactor', any chance you can let 
> me know how I go about changing this so I can run CloudStack on a 1GB (or 
> less) foot print, rather than the current 2GB.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 27 September 2013 08:57
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements
>
> All,
>
> Thanks for all the replies, now a simple question, what do I need to change 
> to test it?
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 26 September 2013 20:29
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CloudStack Server Memory Requirements
>
> If I recall, we were able to start running it in devcloud again with only 1G 
> of memory allocated to dom0 just a few weeks after the initial spring merge. 
> I just think the default was never set back.
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Chiradeep Vittal 
>  wrote:
>> I believe Darren's proposed Spring refactor will help greatly.
>>
>> On 9/26/13 7:41 AM, "Marcus Sorensen"  wrote:
>>
>>>I think its an artifact from the Spring stuff six months ago. We can
>>>probably decrease that in the default tomcat conf now.
>>>On Sep 26, 2013 6:11 AM, "Geoff Higginbottom" <
>>>geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  I¹ve been testing the 4.2 release of CloudStack using Virtual Box
>>>> and have noticed a need to allocate significantly more memory to the VM.
>>>> Previously I would use a CentOS VM with 1 GB of RAM for the
>>>> installation but then drop the memory to 512MB, leaving plenty of
>>>> RAM on the host machine to then stand up a XenServer VM or a KVM VM etc.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I initially had problems logging into 4.2 after a clean install,
>>>>and discovered that only by increasing the memory to 2GB could I get
>>>>the system  to function.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am quite shocked that the memory footprint has increased 400%
>>>>between  releases.  Obviously for a real production system,
>>>>allocating more than 2GB  or RAM

SRX inline with VR

[Geoff Higginbottom]

All,

Is it possible to use a Juniper SRX Firewall for firewall features, and a VR 
for Load Balancing, or do you need to use an F5 to get 'in line' mode

If you can use a SRX, what IP gets load balanced, public or private etc

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

[Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align]

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

ShapeBlue are proud to be sponsoring CloudStack Collab EU 2013
[cid:image004.jpg@01CED4C8.C686BDF0]<http://www.cloudstackcollab.org/>
Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2 
training<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
13/14 November, 
London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
09-13 December, GLOBAL. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
27/28 November, 
Bangalore<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
08/09 January 2014, 
London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: SRX inline with VR

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Sheng,

Thanks for the replies, but I have to admit I'm not 100% sure what your answer 
is - sorry.

I think you are saying - "No, I can't use the VR for LB when using an SRX 
Firewall"

I hope you are not saying that "we cannot use the VR for LB" on its own"

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: 08 November 2013 18:38
To: 
Subject: Re: SRX inline with VR

Sorry, I meant the CloudStack major release after 4.3... Got mixed up a little 
bit...

--Sheng


On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Sheng Yang  wrote:

> Hi Geoff,
>
> Currently we don't support VR as load balancing alone, there are some
> VR limitations need to be solved. I think the current plan is to fix
> it in Felton.
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>>  All,
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to use a Juniper SRX Firewall for firewall features,
>> and a VR for Load Balancing, or do you need to use an F5 to get 'in
>> line' mode
>>
>>
>>
>> If you can use a SRX, what IP gets load balanced, public or private
>> etc
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> *CTO / Cloud Architect*
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align]
>>
>>
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 <+442036030542> | S: +44 20 3603 0540 <+442036030540>| M:
>> +447968161581
>>
>>
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com |
>> Twitter:@shapeblue<https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue>
>>
>>
>>
>> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
>>
>>
>>
>> *ShapeBlue are proud to be sponsoring CloudStack Collab EU 2013*
>>
>> [image:
>> cid:image004.jpg@01CED4C8.C686BDF0]<http://www.cloudstackcollab.org/>
>>
>> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>>
>> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2
>> training<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course
>> />
>>
>> 13/14 November,
>> London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
>>
>> *09-13 December, GLOBAL. Instructor led, On-line
>> <http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/> *
>>
>> 27/28 November,
>> Bangalore<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-cours
>> e/>
>>
>> 08/09 January 2014,
>> London<http://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-bootcamp-training-course/>
>>
>>
>>  This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is
>> addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the
>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or
>> related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this
>> email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor
>> copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
>> received this email in error.
>> Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales.
>> ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and
>> is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil
>> Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated
>> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>
>
>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] List CloudStack related books on the website

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 
0540| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> 
|www.shapeblue.com | Twitter:@shapeblue<https://twitter.com/#!/shapeblue>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS


On 27 May 2013, at 09:27, "Sebastien Goasguen" 
mailto:run...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi,

After a relatively long discussion on the marketing@ list about the "Packt 
Book" [1] I would like to call a vote.

Proposal:

I propose to list CloudStack related books on our website [2]. The page listing 
these books would contain the following disclaimer:

"This listing does not represent official endorsement by the Apache CloudStack 
project. The Apache CloudStack project does not recommend one book versus 
another nor does it guarantee the quality of the books."

Inclusion of a book in the listing would be done via a vote on the marketing@ 
list.


As a quick summary, alternatives to this proposal were to:
1-not do anything
2-list the books on the wiki

A few of us have already expressed their opinions and discussed the 
possibilities. Check [1].

Vote will be open for 96 hours (To accommodate Memorial day in the USA).

Reply with:

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

PS: If edits of the disclaimer are needed but that they do not change the 
meaning of it, the disclaimer will be modified but the vote will not be 
restarted.

[1] http://markmail.org/thread/r4qdmbonmx6yq2uv
[2] http://cloudstack.apache.org

-Sebastien
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

CloudMonkey Broken

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I've been testing CloudMonkey against CloudStack 4.1 and am hitting some 
problems.

I've previously used CloudMonkey to deploy complete Clouds, but even though I'm 
using scripts I've used successfully previously, it now appears to be hanging 
when I try and use the 'create physicalnetwork' command.  The physicalnetwork 
does get created, it.s just giving any feedback such as ID etc.

Here is an example of the command I am using my full command

> create physicalnetwork name=Management 
> zoneid=9eaff802-4060-4de7-bea9-36cbecce8f95 broadcastdomainrange=Zone 
> isolationmethods=VLAN

Shanker has mentioned he has come across this as well, has anyone else seen 
this, and if so is there a fix?

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: CloudMonkey Broken

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Marcus,

I have set asyncblock to true as I need to wait for the Physical Network to be 
created so I can then add a traffic type to it.

I used to do this by capturing the ID of the Physical Network using the | grep 
^id\ = | awk '{print $3}'` section of the 1st command, then use the output in 
the following add traffictype command (just like on the CloudMonkey wiki 
example)

phy1_id=`$cli create physicalnetwork name=$phy1_name zoneid=$zone_id 
broadcastdomain=Zone | grep ^id\ = | awk '{print $3}'`
$cli add traffictype traffictype=$phy1_tt physicalnetworkid=$phy1_id

The problem is CloudMonkey is throwing an error, and not sending back the info 
correctly.

My current 'work around' is to set the timeout to 10, accept that the console 
is going to throw out a load of errors, but ignore them then query the ID of 
the Physical Network in a 2nd command (using the name of the Physical Network I 
just created)

$cli create physicalnetwork name=$phy1_name zoneid=$zone_id broadcastdomain=Zone
phy1_id=`$cli list physicalnetworks name=$phy1_name | grep ^id\ = | awk '{print 
$3}'`
$cli add traffictype traffictype=$phy1_tt physicalnetworkid=$phy1_id

This seems to work, even when I am creating 4 Physical Networks one after 
another, but I would rather I did not have to use this workaround, its dirty.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 June 2013 17:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: CloudMonkey Broken

Is your asyncblock parameter set to true? This mode isnt supposed to return a 
job id. Its supposed to block until the job is done, but something is wrong 
with it.
On Jun 15, 2013 9:46 AM, "Geoff Higginbottom" < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> I've been testing CloudMonkey against CloudStack 4.1 and am hitting
> some problems.
>
> I've previously used CloudMonkey to deploy complete Clouds, but even
> though I'm using scripts I've used successfully previously, it now
> appears to be hanging when I try and use the 'create physicalnetwork'
> command.  The physicalnetwork does get created, it.s just giving any
> feedback such as ID etc.
>
> Here is an example of the command I am using my full command
>
> > create physicalnetwork name=Management
> zoneid=9eaff802-4060-4de7-bea9-36cbecce8f95 broadcastdomainrange=Zone
> isolationmethods=VLAN
>
> Shanker has mentioned he has come across this as well, has anyone else
> seen this, and if so is there a fix?
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 +442036030540> | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue.c
> om>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under
> license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [DISCUSS] Backwards compatibility

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:htrippa...@schubergphilis.com]
Sent: 14 May 2013 16:34
To: 'dev@cloudstack.apache.org'
Subject: [DISCUSS] Backwards compatibility

Hey all,

We have invested a lot of effort in creating upgrade paths from older releases 
to the latest version. As a sysadmin this is one of the things I value 
CloudStack for.

However as a developers there are some drawbacks to this. It means every time 
we release a new version we need to QA the entire upgrade path to check if 
users can upgrade to this new versions. With the speed and features we are 
picking up, I'm expecting this to become a large burden in the near future. My 
proposal would be to draw a line somewhere. Personally I think it would be ok 
to say to a user that wants to upgrade from version 2.2.14 to 4.2 to first 
upgrade to version 4.0.x en than upgrade to 4.2.x.  For our code it does not 
really matter that much, but it does matter for QA and packaging.

For QA we can safely assume that the upgrades from 2.2.14 to 4.0 are covered by 
the 4.0 release. If we run into trouble, we release a maintenance release of 
that version. QA for new versions should focus on a stable upgrade path for one 
or two recent versions and can "ignore" old versions in the process.  With only 
a few versions to test against we could also automate parts of this.

For packaging it is also great. Especially with the current changes in naming 
(from cloud to cloudstack) and potential future changes to integrate better 
with distributions it becomes handy  to be able to have short upgrade paths. 
How reasonable is it to have an upgrade path for 2.2.14 in the RPM when that 
rpm is built for RedHat 7.

I would be in favor of supporting upgrades from the first major release in any 
series. For example 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0 should have a tested upgrade path from 
4.0. 5.1 would have an upgrade path only from 5.0.

What do you guys think?

Cheers,

Hugo

P.S. ignore the version numbers, just used some random version numbers to 
illustrate my ideas.

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Chip,

If I could add my 10 cents worth.

I know of a number of potential CloudStack users who want to deploy CloudStack, 
but ONLY when this feature is available as it is critical to their deployment 
plans.  One of them is actually looking at OpenStack as an alternative!

What I am also confused about is that it has been in Citrix CloudPlatform since 
3.0.6 release, and has been improved in subsequent updates (2x patch releases)

If it is working in CloudPlatform, we should be able to get it into the 
CloudStack 4.1 release

Therefore I vote for option 1: Pull the feature into 4.1 and do the relevant 
testing

I am sure I can get some volunteers to help with testing, myself included.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com


-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@sungard.com]
Sent: 15 May 2013 15:14
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ACS41] Discuss CLOUDSTACK-2463 being resolved in 4.1 vs 4.2

Sebastian re-opened CLOUDSTACK-2463 due to users wanting to upgrade from 2.x to 
4.1.  This relates to the security groups feature being available when using 
VLANs in an advanced networking zone.  This feature was apparently broken in 
the 3.x series, and is not slated to be reintroduced until 4.2.

This is a horrible situation, and one that we've now encountered for a third 
time.

IMO, we have 2 very specific options:

1) We pull that new feature into 4.1, and do the relevant testing.

2) We do not pull that feature into 4.1, and release as is with a strong 
message in the release notes highlighting that we know that 2.x to 4.1 will not 
support it (and state that those users requiring the feature should wait for 
4.2).

At this point, I don't have a preference.  We probably need to understand the 
effort for (1), as well as understand who would do that work (dev AND testing).

Thoughts?

-chip

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under 
license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1

I am unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the 
UI, the interfaces no longer exist.  I did create a Port Forwarding Rule via 
the API successfully to prove it's just a UI issue.

VMs assigned to VPC's fail to deploy and are then deleted.

I was unable to complete my remaining tests as these required a working VPC and 
the ability to create Firewall, Port Forwarding and Load Balancing Rules for 
Isolated Networks.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 January 2014 04:54
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round)

Hi All,

I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: 66d0b3d45bda73205b59693baeeefdf27e6c9c66


List of changes:
 New Features in 4.3: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162


Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure

Vote will be open for 72 hours (excluding weekend). I will count the VOTE 
Sunday night PST.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?


[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round) - unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the UI, the interfaces no longer exist.

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Jessica.

Yes, I can get as far as the Source NAT IP Address but then all I have is the 
Details Tab but no Configuration Tab.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 
4HS


On 29 Jan 2014, at 23:18, "Jessica Wang" 
mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com>> wrote:

Geoff,

I am unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the 
UI, the interfaces no longer exist.

Are you referring to the Configuration tab in IP Address detail page?
It's under Guest Network section or VPC section?

e.g. Network > Guest Network > IP Addresses > click a SourceNAT IP, or a 
Non-SourceNAT IP > Configuration tab is missing here?

e.g. Network > VPC > Router > IP Addresses > click a SourceNAT IP, or a 
Non-SourceNAT IP > Configuration tab is missing here?

Jessica


-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:52 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round)

-1

I am unable to manage Firewall, Port Forwarding or Load Balancing rules via the 
UI, the interfaces no longer exist.  I did create a Port Forwarding Rule via 
the API successfully to prove it's just a UI issue.

VMs assigned to VPC's fail to deploy and are then deleted.

I was unable to complete my remaining tests as these required a working VPC and 
the ability to create Firewall, Port Forwarding and Load Balancing Rules for 
Isolated Networks.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>

-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 January 2014 04:54
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (second round)

Hi All,

I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: 66d0b3d45bda73205b59693baeeefdf27e6c9c66


List of changes:
 New Features in 4.3: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162


Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Testing instructions are here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure

Vote will be open for 72 hours (excluding weekend). I will count the VOTE 
Sunday night PST.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?


[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated unde

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1

The UI no longer shows the correct number of Virtual Routers - it always show 
ZERO even when there are multiple VRs running.

Logged as CLOUDSTACK-6031

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 13:26
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

+1

No product issues observed in BVT runs.

CloudStack built from commit: 8f63c2cf9c463373d774cb563e63fc56828e1418

On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1185 and #1186

5 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are not 
supported on KVM Hypervisor and more intermittent test script/env issue related 
to ssh.
---
Link to reports:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1185/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1186/testReport/

Total:97
Fail :5
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 3   0   0
test_guest_vlan_range/1   0   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
test_scale_vm/0   1   0
test_ssvm/   10   0   0
test_network/ 7   0   0
test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
test_volumes/ 8   1   0
test_affinity_groups/ 1   0   0
test_routers/ 9   0   0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2   0   0
test_network_acl/ 1   0   0
test_vm_life_cycle/  10   0   0
test_privategw_acl/   1   0   0
test_internal_lb/ 1   0   0
test_deploy_vm/   1   0   0
test_global_settings/ 1   0   0
test_nic/ 1   0   0
test_public_ip_range/ 1   0   0
test_iso/ 5   0   1
test_service_offerings/   4   0   0
test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1   0   0
test_regions/ 1   0   0
test_templates/   7   0   1
test_vpc_vpn/ 2   0   0
test_vm_snapshots/0   3   0
test_portable_publicip/   2   0   0
test_pvlan/   1   0   0



On XenServer 6.2/Test Run: #1187 and #1188

3 failures are intermittent test script/env issues related to ssh.
---
Link to reports:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1187/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1188/testReport/

Total:97
Fail :3
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 3   0   0
test_guest_vlan_range/1   0   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
test_scale_vm/1   0   0
test_ssvm/   10   0   0
test_network/ 7   0   0
test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
test_volumes/ 9   0   0
test_affinity_groups/ 1   0   0
test_routers/ 9   0   0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2   0   0
test_network_acl/ 1   0   0
test_vm_life_cycle/  10   0   0
test_privategw_acl/   1   0

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) - CLOUDSTACK-6031 Virtual Router count not displaying in UI Infrastructure Screen

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Jessica,

Great news, many thanks.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Jessica Wang [mailto:jessica.w...@citrix.com]
Sent: 05 February 2014 22:19
To: Geoff Higginbottom
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round) - CLOUDSTACK-6031 
Virtual Router count not displaying in UI Infrastructure Screen

Geoff,

I just fixed CLOUDSTACK-6031 in 4.3-forward branch.

Jessica

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 4:29 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

-1

The UI no longer shows the correct number of Virtual Routers - it always show 
ZERO even when there are multiple VRs running.

Logged as CLOUDSTACK-6031

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 13:26
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

+1

No product issues observed in BVT runs.

CloudStack built from commit: 8f63c2cf9c463373d774cb563e63fc56828e1418

On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1185 and #1186

5 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are not 
supported on KVM Hypervisor and more intermittent test script/env issue related 
to ssh.
---
Link to reports:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1185/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1186/testReport/

Total:97
Fail :5
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 3   0   0
test_guest_vlan_range/1   0   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
test_scale_vm/0   1   0
test_ssvm/   10   0   0
test_network/ 7   0   0
test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
test_volumes/ 8   1   0
test_affinity_groups/ 1   0   0
test_routers/ 9   0   0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2   0   0
test_network_acl/ 1   0   0
test_vm_life_cycle/  10   0   0
test_privategw_acl/   1   0   0
test_internal_lb/ 1   0   0
test_deploy_vm/   1   0   0
test_global_settings/ 1   0   0
test_nic/ 1   0   0
test_public_ip_range/ 1   0   0
test_iso/ 5   0   1
test_service_offerings/   4   0   0
test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1   0   0
test_regions/ 1   0   0
test_templates/   7   0   1
test_vpc_vpn/ 2   0   0
test_vm_snapshots/0   3   0
test_portable_publicip/   2   0   0
test_pvlan/   1   0   0



On XenServer 6.2/Test Run: #1187 and #1188

3 failures are intermittent test script/env issues related to ssh.
---
Link to reports:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1187/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1188/testReport/

Total:97
Fail :3
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 3   0   0
test_guest_vlan_range/1   0   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1 from me

There is a minor issue which I have logged 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6119 but this is by no means a 
show stopper.

Tested upgrading from 4.2.1 then creating a Zone and associated components 
based on XenServer 6.2.

Create Domain, Accounts, Users, Gust VMs on Isolated Network, egress Rules, VPC 
with 2 tiers, ACLs etc

Noticed previous VR Bug is fixed and also the Root Volume Size bug when 
creating a VM from Template have all been fixed so great work guys.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: 14 February 2014 06:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)




Hi All,



I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a

vote:



Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, I 
would like to close out this VOTE little sooner by Tuesday morning PST.



Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc



List of changes:

New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248

Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249

Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161

Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162







Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same

location):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/



PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS



Testing instructions are here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure



Vote will be open for 72 hours (Tuesday morning PST)



For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?



[ ] +1  approve

[ ] +0  no opinion

[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)


Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment:

I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to re-create the 
issue.  Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the existing range, then 
dedicated to a normal user account, all successful, and all on the latest RC 
(fifth round).

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Srikanteswararao Talluri [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

There is a new test failure in this RC which is a regression from previous RC.  
Created a bug for this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6131

http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-matrix
-4.3/1194/suite=test_guest_vlan_range/testReport/integration.smoke.test_gue
st_vlan_range/TestDedicateGuestVlanRange/test_dedicateGuestVlanRange/




On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1193

4 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are not 
supported on KVM Hypervisor and 5 more intermittent test script/env issue 
related to ssh.
1 failure related to dedicated guest VLAN range looks like a bug
---
Link to reports:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1193/testReport/


Total:98
Fail :10
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 0   4   0
test_guest_vlan_range/0   1   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
test_scale_vm/0   1   0
test_ssvm/   10   0   0
test_network/ 7   0   0
test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
test_volumes/ 9   0   0
test_affinity_groups/ 1   0   0
test_routers/ 9   0   0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2   0   0
test_network_acl/ 1   0   0
test_vm_life_cycle/   9   1   0
test_privategw_acl/   1   0   0
test_internal_lb/ 1   0   0
test_deploy_vm/   1   0   0
test_global_settings/ 1   0   0
test_nic/ 1   0   0
test_public_ip_range/ 1   0   0
test_iso/ 5   0   1
test_service_offerings/   4   0   0
test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1   0   0
test_regions/ 1   0   0
test_templates/   7   0   1
test_vpc_vpn/ 2   0   0
test_vm_snapshots/0   3   0
test_portable_publicip/   2   0   0
test_pvlan/   1   0   0



On XenServer6.2/Test Run: #1194

5 failures are intermittent test script/env issues related to ssh and 1 failure 
in dedicated guest vlan range looks like a bug
---
Link to reports:
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1194/testReport/


Total:98
Fail :6
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 3   0   0
test_guest_vlan_range/0   1   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
test_scale_vm/1   0   0
test_ssvm/   10   0   0
test_network/ 7   0   0
test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
test_volumes/ 9   0   0
test_affinity_g

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

All,

I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is 
apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI (no 
buttons) or from the API.

Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have the 
latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN APIs listed.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

-1 (binding)

tested vlan based standalone network
tested vlan based bridged network
tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with nicira 
based gateway and - tier network

All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from the 
instance.

All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan based tests 
didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface were created with no ip 
and after manually assigning ips, the routers still couldn't be pinged,

For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and recreating 
it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can not yet point to a bug 
that causes this.

My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward branch wasn't 
cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had assumed it would be 
included due to [2].

[1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5
[2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk

kind regards,
Daan Hoogland

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri 
 wrote:
> Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought one up 
> and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed in the 
> next run.
>
> So, it is a +1 from my side
>
> Sent from HTC
>
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "Geoff Higginbottom" 
> To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
> Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM
>
>
>
> I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment:
>
> I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to re-create 
> the issue.  Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the existing range, 
> then dedicated to a normal user account, all successful, and all on the 
> latest RC (fifth round).
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Srikanteswararao Talluri
> [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
>
> There is a new test failure in this RC which is a regression from
> previous RC.  Created a bug for this
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6131
>
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smoke-m
> atrix
> -4.3/1194/suite=test_guest_vlan_range/testReport/integration.smoke.tes
> t_gue
> st_vlan_range/TestDedicateGuestVlanRange/test_dedicateGuestVlanRange/
>
>
>
>
> On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1193
> 
> 4 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are not 
> supported on KVM Hypervisor and 5 more intermittent test script/env issue 
> related to ssh.
> 1 failure related to dedicated guest VLAN range looks like a bug
> ---
> Link to reports:
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1193/testRepo
> rt/
>
> 
> Total:98
> Fail :10
> Skip :2
> 
>
> name   passfailskip
> test_loadbalance/ 0   4   0
> test_guest_vlan_range/0   1   0
> test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
> test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
> test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
> test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
> test_scale_vm/0   1   0
> test_ssvm/   10   0   0
> test_network/ 7   0   0
> test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
> test_volumes/ 9   0   0
> test_affinity_groups/ 1   0   0
> test_routers/ 9   0   

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Thanks Sheng,

Unfortunately there is no "Enable VPN" option on the VPC Source NAT IP like 
there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP.

Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/

The "vpc_id" fields which according to the spec are supposed to have been added 
to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing.

Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more than a 
UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC.

If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round RC has 
just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll vote -0 as it's 
not a blocker, just missing when it should be there.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24
To: 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

Hi Geoff,

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+for+VPC

I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well.

The steps are(as refered in the spec):

1. User click VPC's IP list
2. User choose VPC's source nat IP
3. User click "Enable VPN"
4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network

--Sheng


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is
> apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI
> (no
> buttons) or from the API.
>
> Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have
> the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN
> APIs listed.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> tested vlan based standalone network
> tested vlan based bridged network
> tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with
> nicira based gateway and - tier network
>
> All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from
> the instance.
>
> All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan
> based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface
> were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the routers
> still couldn't be pinged,
>
> For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and
> recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can
> not yet point to a bug that causes this.
>
> My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward
> branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had
> assumed it would be included due to [2].
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5
> [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk
>
> kind regards,
> Daan Hoogland
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri <
> srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought
> > one
> up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed
> in the next run.
> >
> > So, it is a +1 from my side
> >
> > Sent from HTC
> >
> >
> > - Reply message -
> > From: "Geoff Higginbottom" 
> > To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
> > Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM
> >
> >
> >
> > I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment:
> >
> > I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to
> re-create the issue.  Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the
> existing range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all
> successful, and all on the latest RC (fifth round).
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Srikanteswararao Talluri
> > [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
> >
> > There is a new test failu

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hugo,

I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the changes.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56
To: 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

-1 (binding)

I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 to 
version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find the 
correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes at 
http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html 
with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations and 
a wrong version number for the systemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i 
think that currently users can't upgrade from a previous release to the new 
release.

Cheers,

Hugo




On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I
> can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak
> with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or
> project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be.
>
> @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix
> was done in a hurry and communicated poorly.
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
>  wrote:
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>>
>>
>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>
>> vote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few 
>> times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I 
>> would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). 
>> Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period.
>>
>>
>>
>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h
>> =refs/heads/4.3
>> Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9
>>
>>
>>
>> List of changes:
>>
>> New Features in 4.3:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>>
>> Improvement in 4.3:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>>
>> Issues fixed in 4.3
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>>
>> Known Issues in 4.3:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>
>> location):
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>>
>>
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>
>>
>>
>> Testing instructions are here:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+p
>> rocedure
>>
>>
>>
>> Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST)
>>
>>
>>
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
>> "(binding)" with their vote?
>>
>>
>>
>> [ ] +1  approve
>>
>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>
>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daan

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hugo,

Is there an easy way to track the latest version of the system vm template 
builds as I now appear to be slightly out of date.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: 19 February 2014 14:47
To: 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)


Just checked the new systemvms. The build date Geoff put in the file is 
2014-01-14, but the last changes to the systemvms have been made on jan 
2014-01-16. So this is not the build that belongs to the current release 
artifact that we are testing, that systemvm should have the problems as 
described in ticket CLOUDSTACK-5883.

Cheers,

Hugo



On 19 feb. 2014, at 14:03, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> Just commit the changes, you have the commit bit. ;-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
> On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
>
>> Hugo,
>>
>> I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the 
>> changes.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>
>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
>> Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56
>> To: 
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>>
>> -1 (binding)
>>
>> I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 
>> to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find 
>> the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release 
>> notes at 
>> http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html 
>> with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations 
>> and a wrong version number for the systemvm template 
>> (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from 
>> a previous release to the new release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Hugo
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>>
>>> sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh.
>>> I can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't
>>> speak with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to
>>> or project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be.
>>>
>>> @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix
>>> was done in a hurry and communicated poorly.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>>>
>>>> vote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few 
>>>> times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, 
>>>> I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). 
>>>> Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog
>>>> ;h
>>>> =refs/heads/4.3
>>>> Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> List of changes:
>>>>
>>>> New Features in 4.3:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>>>>
>>>> Improvement in 4.3:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>>>>
>>>> Issues fixed in 4.3
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>>>>
>>>> Known Issues in 4.3:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>>
>>>> location):
>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> PG

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

So looks like we should all be testing this latest RC with the system VM 
templates dated 2014-02-18 then?

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: 19 February 2014 15:08
To: 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Geoff,

The latest build is always on the jenkins server, 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm64/

I think Edison does the uploads of the images to cloud.com, i don't have access 
to that site.

Cheers,

Hugo


On 19 feb. 2014, at 12:56, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:

> Hugo,
>
> I've just update the release docs and submitted a Pull Request with the 
> changes.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
> Sent: 19 February 2014 10:56
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> I'm trying to upgrade an existing cloudstack installation from version 4.2.1 
> to version 4.3 and this is flinging because the database checker can't find 
> the correct systemvm templates for the 4.3 release. I found the release notes 
> at 
> http://apache-cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/rnotes.html 
> with the upgrade instructions, but these point to wrong download locations 
> and a wrong version number for the systemvm template 
> (systemvm-xenserver-4.2). So i think that currently users can't upgrade from 
> a previous release to the new release.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
>
>
>
> On 19 feb. 2014, at 10:41, Daan Hoogland  wrote:
>
>> sorry for not replying to your question in the rc-5 thread Animesh. I
>> can deal with a shorter window on this one as you asked. Didn't speak
>> with Hugo yet. For your assurance we are considering going to or
>> project env with the rc(6) no matter what the vote will be.
>>
>> @Sheng: you are right about pointing out the lack of ticket. the fix
>> was done in a hurry and communicated poorly.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:25 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>>
>>> vote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few 
>>> times, and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, 
>>> I would like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). 
>>> Please call out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
>>> h
>>> =refs/heads/4.3
>>> Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> List of changes:
>>>
>>> New Features in 4.3:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
>>>
>>> Improvement in 4.3:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
>>>
>>> Issues fixed in 4.3
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
>>>
>>> Known Issues in 4.3:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>
>>> location):
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Testing instructions are here:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+
>>> p
>>> rocedure
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
>>> "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>>
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
&

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Happy to report that the Remote User VPC VPN appears to be included in the 
latest RC so will fully test tomorrow.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom
Sent: 19 February 2014 09:47
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

Thanks Sheng,

Unfortunately there is no "Enable VPN" option on the VPC Source NAT IP like 
there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP.

Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI 
https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/

The "vpc_id" fields which according to the spec are supposed to have been added 
to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing.

Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more than a 
UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC.

If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round RC has 
just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll vote -0 as it's 
not a blocker, just missing when it should be there.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24
To: 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

Hi Geoff,

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+for+VPC

I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well.

The steps are(as refered in the spec):

1. User click VPC's IP list
2. User choose VPC's source nat IP
3. User click "Enable VPN"
4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network

--Sheng


On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which is
> apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the UI
> (no
> buttons) or from the API.
>
> Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I have
> the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC Remote VPN
> APIs listed.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
>
> -1 (binding)
>
> tested vlan based standalone network
> tested vlan based bridged network
> tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested vpc with
> nicira based gateway and - tier network
>
> All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router from
> the instance.
>
> All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan
> based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface
> were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the routers
> still couldn't be pinged,
>
> For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and
> recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can
> not yet point to a bug that causes this.
>
> My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward
> branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I had
> assumed it would be included due to [2].
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5
> [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk
>
> kind regards,
> Daan Hoogland
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri <
> srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just brought
> > one
> up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test passed
> in the next run.
> >
> > So, it is a +1 from my side
> >
> > Sent from HTC
> >
> >
> > - Reply message -
> > From: "Geoff Higginbottom" 
> > To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" 
> > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
> > Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM
> >
> >
> >
> > I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment:
> >
> > I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to
> re-create the issue.  Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to the
> existing range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all
> successful, and all on the latest RC (fifth round).
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 05

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Sheng,

Our e-mails will have crossed mid Atlantic - I just sent out an e-mail saying 
how it is now there and appears to be functioning in the sixth RC and will 
fully test tomorrow.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
Sent: 19 February 2014 19:26
To: 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)

Hi Geoff,

In fact I just tested the latest 4.3 branch before replied to you yesterday, 
and there is no issue on mine. And it's already pass QA testing.

It's really weird. Could you double confirm your version or your setup? The 
build I got is from:

commit adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc
Author: Kelven Yang 
Date:   Thu Feb 13 14:34:06 2014 -0800

CLOUDSTACK-6065: Fix NPE problem caused by the lack of context setup in 
threads from agent manager thread pool
(cherry picked from commit 1283919f02e2c4d2652ca18693b6cf2906b2263d)

Signed-off-by: Animesh Chaturvedi 


--Sheng

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Thanks Sheng,
>
> Unfortunately there is no "Enable VPN" option on the VPC Source NAT IP
> like there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP.
>
> Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/
>
> The "vpc_id" fields which according to the spec are supposed to have
> been added to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing.
>
> Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more
> than a UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC.
>
> If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round
> RC has just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll
> vote -0 as it's not a blocker, just missing when it should be there.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org]
> Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24
> To: 
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+V
> PN+for+VPC
>
> I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well.
>
> The steps are(as refered in the spec):
>
> 1. User click VPC's IP list
> 2. User choose VPC's source nat IP
> 3. User click "Enable VPN"
> 4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network
>
> --Sheng
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which
> > is apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the
> > UI (no
> > buttons) or from the API.
> >
> > Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I
> > have the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC
> > Remote VPN APIs listed.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round)
> >
> > -1 (binding)
> >
> > tested vlan based standalone network tested vlan based bridged
> > network tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested
> > vpc with nicira based gateway and - tier network
> >
> > All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router
> > from the instance.
> >
> > All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan
> > based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface
> > were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the
> > routers still couldn't be pinged,
> >
> > For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and
> > recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can
> > not yet point to a bug that causes this.
> >
> > My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward
> > branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I
> > had assumed it would be included due to [2].
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5
> > [2] 

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Animesh,

Thanks for the clarification I'll update the release notes shortly, but I also 
notice there are no references to the Hyper-V Template in the currently release 
notes, is anyone able to add the correct settings.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
Sent: 20 February 2014 00:11
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

Folks

I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3


We had fixed the templates to be used in 4.3 and reflected the links in 
cloudstack database after uploading to download.cloud.com



Here are the links:



HyperV: 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2013-12-23-hyperv.vhd.bz2

KVM: 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-kvm.qcow2.bz2

VMWare: 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-vmware.ova

Xen: 
http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2



Unless there is a discussed change that requires updating the templates we use 
these published templates for 4.3.



I am still waiting on feedback for this RC.



Thanks

Animesh




From: Animesh Chaturvedi
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 8:25 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)



Hi All,



I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a

vote:



Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing a few times, 
and this VOTE has just one isolated fix in Nicira from previous RC, I would 
like to close the VOTE sooner by Thursday morning PST (36 hours). Please call 
out if you want to stick to 72 hour (3 working day) period.



Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
Commit: 307ad15bb68179129b8eadeaed115f5d088adfd9



List of changes:

New Features in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248

Improvement in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249

Issues fixed in 4.3 https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161

Known Issues in 4.3: https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162







Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same

location):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/



PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS



Testing instructions are here:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+test+procedure



Vote will be open for 36 hours (Thursday morning PST)



For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?



[ ] +1  approve

[ ] +0  no opinion

[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Have now successfully tested the new VPC Remote VPN feature, and all other 
tests pass (based on upgrading a clean build from 4.2.1 and deploying  new Zone)

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 February 2014 12:11
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)

+1 (binding)

based on the rc-5 testing I've done and a diff of the releases. The extra patch 
I asked for is being tested by Hugo, no doubt he will approve shortly.

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Nux!  wrote:
> On 20.02.2014 11:58, Sateesh Chodapuneedi wrote:
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>> Sent: 20 February 2014 17:05
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (sixth round)
>>>
>>> On 20.02.2014 00:10, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Folks
>>>>
>>>> I want to clear up the confusion on system templates for 4.3
>>>
>>>
>>> I have noticed the system vms come up with 128 MB ram, isn't this a
>>> bit too little for 64bit machines?
>>
>>
>> The memory requirements of each system vm varies based on the load of
>> services running.
>>
>> From my setup I can see only elasticloadbalancer has 128MB.
>> Can you please let me know for which system vm did you observe 128MB RAM?
>
>
> The virtual router, but I think I am wrong now that I checked again,
> it is indeed 128 MB, but somehow I ended up with 32bit version of the 
> template.
> Will need to redeploy systemvms with the 64bit template.. Sorry for
> the noise.
>
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro



--
Daan
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Upgrade problems 3.0.7 - 4.2.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi,

I am trying to upgrade a CloudPlatfom 3.0.7 build to Apache CloudStack 4.2.1

The DB upgrade keeps failing with the logs highlighting a 'system integrity 
check failure'

Any help would be greatly appreciated


2014-03-26 14:53:31,883 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) --   
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
2014-03-26 14:53:31,883 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) --
2014-03-26 14:53:31,883 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) -- Unless 
required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
2014-03-26 14:53:31,884 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) -- 
software distributed under the License is distributed on an
2014-03-26 14:53:31,884 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) -- "AS IS" 
BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
2014-03-26 14:53:31,884 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) -- KIND, 
either express or implied.  See the License for the
2014-03-26 14:53:31,884 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) -- 
specific language governing permissions and limitations
2014-03-26 14:53:31,884 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) -- under 
the License.
2014-03-26 14:53:31,884 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) INSERT 
IGNORE INTO `cloud`.`configuration` VALUES ('Network', 'DEFAULT', 
'management-server', 'network.loadbalancer.haproxy.max.conn', '4096', 'Load 
Balancer(haproxy) maximum number of concurrent connections(global max)')
2014-03-26 14:53:31,885 DEBUG [utils.db.ScriptRunner] (Timer-2:null) ALTER 
TABLE `cloud`.`network_offerings` ADD COLUMN `concurrent_connections` int(10) 
unsigned COMMENT 'concurrent connections supported on this network'
2014-03-26 14:53:31,912 DEBUG [db.Transaction.Transaction] (Timer-2:null) 
Rolling back the transaction: Time = 36 Name =  
-CloudStartupServlet$1.run:52-TimerThread.mainLoop:534-TimerThread.run:484; 
called by 
-Transaction.rollback:897-Transaction.removeUpTo:840-Transaction.close:664-DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade:298-DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check:394-ComponentContext.initComponentsLifeCycle:90-CloudStartupServlet$1.run:54-TimerThread.mainLoop:534-TimerThread.run:484
2014-03-26 14:53:31,916 ERROR [utils.component.ComponentContext] (Timer-2:null) 
System integrity check failed. Refuse to startup
javax.persistence.EntityExistsException: Entity already exists:
at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.persist(GenericDaoBase.java:1346)
at 
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.upgrade(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:290)
at 
com.cloud.upgrade.DatabaseUpgradeChecker.check(DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java:394)
at 
com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentContext.initComponentsLifeCycle(ComponentContext.java:90)
   at 
com.cloud.servlet.CloudStartupServlet$1.run(CloudStartupServlet.java:54)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Timer.java:534)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Timer.java:484)
Caused by: 
com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.jdbc4.MySQLIntegrityConstraintViolationException: 
Duplicate entry '3.0.7' for key 'version'
at sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.newInstance(DelegatingConstructorAccessorImpl.java:45)
at java.lang.reflect.Constructor.newInstance(Constructor.java:534)
at com.mysql.jdbc.Util.handleNewInstance(Util.java:411)
at com.mysql.jdbc.Util.getInstance(Util.java:386)
at com.mysql.jdbc.SQLError.createSQLException(SQLError.java:1040)
at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:4074)
at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:4006)
at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sendCommand(MysqlIO.java:2468)
at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.sqlQueryDirect(MysqlIO.java:2629)
at com.mysql.jdbc.ConnectionImpl.execSQL(ConnectionImpl.java:2719)
at 
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeInternal(PreparedStatement.java:2155)
at 
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:2450)
at 
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:2371)
at 
com.mysql.jdbc.PreparedStatement.executeUpdate(PreparedStatement.java:2355)
at 
org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:105)
at 
org.apache.commons.dbcp.DelegatingPreparedStatement.executeUpdate(DelegatingPreparedStatement.java:105)
    at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.persist(GenericDaoBase.java:1311)
... 6 more




Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

[Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align]

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.

addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi,

I'm looking for some help with api call addBaremetalPxeKickStartServer in 
particular values for pxeservertype parameter

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

[Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align]

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstacguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. 
Classromm<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

HeartBleed - New System VM Templates

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Have any new system vm templates been released yet to address the HeartBleed 
issue ?

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

[Description: Mail Logo Bottom Align]

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstacguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. 
Classromm<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: HeartBleed - New System VM Templates

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Thanks Nux,

Anyone know why these have not been uploaded and the build docs updated as they 
are still referencing the old, presumable insecure versions.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 29 April 2014 09:55
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: HeartBleed - New System VM Templates

On 29.04.2014 09:48, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> Have any new system vm templates been released yet to address the
> HeartBleed issue ?

Aren't the latest from Jenkins using the latest Debian 7 updates?
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.3/job/cloudstack-4.3-systemvm/

I thought that's the case and they are safe and the only issue was upgrading 
the running System VMs to these ones.

Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
28th-29th May 2014, Bangalore. 
Classromm<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
15th-20th September 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
22nd-27th September 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
1st-6th December 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
8th-12th December 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [PROPOSAL] - Change Primary IP Address

[Geoff Higginbottom]

CloudStack supports 'cloud' workloads and 'enterprise' workloads as has been 
highlighted numerous times recently in e-mails comparing CloudStack to 
OpenStack.

Yes 'cloudy' workloads should not need this, but enterprise workloads most 
definitely do.

This is something which regularly comes up on the user lists

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
Sent: 29 May 2014 05:27
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] - Change Primary IP Address

Curious: What is the reason to change the primary IP?  Quite un-cloudy.

@Wido: changing the IP in basic zone is quite involved, not just changing a 
dnsmasq entry.

From: Wido den Hollander mailto:w...@widodh.nl>>
Reply-To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" 
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 at 2:08 PM
To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>" 
mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] - Change Primary IP Address


On 05/28/2014 04:36 PM, Alex Hitchins wrote:
All, I'd like to submit the below proposal. This can also be found here :
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/New+API+call+to+chang
e+Primary+IP+address+after+VM+creation+in+Advanced+Zones

I've started looking into this project although before anything is written I'd 
like community thoughts and feedback.


Why only Advanced? I think this feature would benefit Basic Zone networks as 
well.

I know that a lot of public cloud offerings use the Basic Zone networking and 
would love to see this feature.

Wido



Subject: New API call to change Primary IP address after VM creation in 
Advanced Zones.

Background: Currently the only way to change the IP address (via the API) is to 
drop a NIC attached to the VM and then add a new NIC with the desired new IP 
address. The process is as follows:

1. Add Temp NIC
2. Make Temp NIC default
3. Remove original NIC
4. Add NIC on same network as NIC removed in step 3, specifying IP as you add 
it 5. Make newly added NIC default 6. Remove Temp NIC

This process works however it will mean the VM will see a new MAC address which 
could mean additional configuration is required.

The existing API calls (removeIPFromNic & addIpToNic) only allow the user to 
modify the secondary IP addresses. This proposal is to create a new API call 
allowing the user to reset the IP address without the need to remove and add a 
new NIC.

Requirements:

1. Add a new API call under the NIC section for root & admin users, allowing 
them to specify a new IP address for a given NIC e.g. amendIpToNic ( int nicId, 
string oldIpAddress, string newIpAddress ) 2. The system should check to ensure 
the new IP address that is being applied isn't already in use on the network.
3. The API call on success will require the virtual machine to be restarted for 
DHCP to be refreshed.
4. The functionality should apply to Advanced Zones.

Comments:

While we will perform a cursory check to see that the IP address isn't already 
in use, no other checks will be made. It will still be up to the domain 
administrator to manage IP allocation.





Alex Hitchins
--
E: a...@alexhitchins.com<mailto:a...@alexhitchins.com>
W: alexhitchins.com
M: 07788 423 969
T: 01892 523 587



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.3.1, round #2

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1

I have tested an upgrade from a 4.3 install and whilst nearly everything I have 
tested works, unfortunately a bug which was introduced in 4.3.0 
(CLOUDSTACK-6624) is still there.

The good news however is that I raised this with one of our Devs and it has now 
been fixed so can be tested in the next voting round.

Will continue testing as much as possible where time from @dayjob permits

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 05 September 2014 17:01
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack 4.3.1, round #2

+1

Using reasons from previous voting round, tested for Xen/KVM, basic zone + SG.

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +41 779015219 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+0  only because of the issues in the release notes, a clean install and an 
upgrade from 4.3.1 went OK, but only because I know how to do it, it would not 
work if I followed the release notes.  The Router Upgrade notification elements 
in the UI, introduced in 4.3 are also broken (this should possibly be a -1 as 
it could result in installs running with the wrong version of the VRs without 
realising)

Notes:

2x XenServer 6.2 in a single Cluster
NFS Primary Storage x2
System VM Template from 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-4.4-2014-09-30-xen.vhd.bz2
Clean install of 4.4.1 to single management server on CentOS 6.5 with MySQL 
installed locally
Created new Zone, POD, Cluster, Sec Storage, Hosts, Pri Storage all via API
Updated Various Global Settings via API
Created Domains and Accounts via API
Deployed VMs for user account as Root and configured network Egress rules via 
API
Deployed VM as root via UI
Live Migrated VMs between Hosts
Offline Migrated (VM stopped) Root Volume between Pri Storage via UI - 
cloudstack service crashed! (Install is running inside VirtualBox and 
Management VM is also NFS Server so added more RAM and tried again) - repeated 
test after a manual clean up and it was successful
Live Migrated (VM running) Root Volume between Pri Storage via UI
Disabled / Re-enabled Host
Adding / removing NICs and changing default etc via UI
Deployed new VPC, with two tiers, added VM to each tier, setup ACLs etc via API


Then I did an upgrade test of a 4.3.1 system using the latest system VM 
template from Jenkins (this system was originally built on 4.3.0 and upgraded 
to 4.3.1, before being upgraded to 4.4.1)
New System VM template installed OK

The steps in the release notes about downloading vhd-utils for XenServer are 
misleading.  If you blindly follow the steps the simply end up with a 2nd copy 
'vhd-utils.1' as this is an upgrade and you will already have vhd-utils on the 
management server, at least if upgrading from a recent release such as 4.3.x.

If vhd-utils needs replacing we need to be specific about removing the old one. 
 I don’t think it actually needs replacing, it's just in a different location 
to older installs, but the 4.3 upgrade guide still has this step in it. (I 
can't remember which release changed the location)

The MySQL Statements for the manual upgrade of the template are also incorrect 
as they do not include the DB name so fail

e.g.
select id,name from vm_template where name = 'systemvm-xenserver-4.4';

should be
select id,name from cloud.vm_template where name = 'systemvm-xenserver-4.4';

The same with the following commands

update vm_template set type='SYSTEM' where id='';
update vm_instance set vm_template_id = '' where 
type='ConsoleProxy' and hypervisor_type = 'xenserver';
update vm_instance set vm_template_id = '' where 
type='SecondaryStorageVm' and hypervisor_type = 'xenserver';
update configuration set value = 'systemvm-xenserver-4.4' where name = 
'router.template.xen';

should be

update cloud.vm_template set type='SYSTEM' where id='';
update cloud.vm_instance set vm_template_id = '' where 
type='ConsoleProxy' and hypervisor_type = 'xenserver';
update cloud.vm_instance set vm_template_id = '' where 
type='SecondaryStorageVm' and hypervisor_type = 'xenserver';
update cloud.configuration set value = 'systemvm-xenserver-4.4' where name = 
'router.template.xen';

However I did not need to do this as the cloud.vm_instance table and 
cloud.configuration table had automatically been updated to the correct values, 
so are these steps actually necessary?

4.3 introduced the ability to manage the restart of VRs via the UI, but after 
upgrading to 4.4.1 the UI lists all VRs as NOT requiring upgrade, even though 
they have not been upgraded yet and are clearly shown as still be at version 4.3

I could fix the release notes issues, but there may be good reasons why they 
are how they are that I am not aware of, so just wanted to highlight them for 
now.  I have only tested the XenServer upgrade steps and only from 4.3 so there 
may be similar errors in other sections.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 30 September 2014 03:31
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC20140924T2100

+1

basic deployment, did tests upgrade from 4.3.0  and 4.2.1 to 4.4.1 , it went 
smoothly in both cases.
I've tests using XenServer 6.2.0 with system vm from :
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Pierre-Luc,

Nope, I was deffinately looking at 4.4.1 release notes, complete with sections 
titled 'Issues fixed in 4.4.1' etc

http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.3.html

I would include a screen shot of the page but it will get stripped from the 
e-mail

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 01 October 2014 14:49
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC20140924T2100

Geoff,

Could it be possible you've followed 4.4.0 upgrade path ? because we don't have 
to perform any MySQL query when upgrading to 4.4.1,  otherwise the RN is not 
correct.
the current RN for 4.4.1 is:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.4.1/
 (not /latest yet as it's not release yet)

for the vhd-utils, I wasn't sure if it was making sense to keep it on all 
upgrade path, thanks for the comment, make sense to remove if from upgrade 
4.3.x and probably 4.2.x as it should already be in place.


PL




On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> +0  only because of the issues in the release notes, a clean install
> +and
> an upgrade from 4.3.1 went OK, but only because I know how to do it,
> it would not work if I followed the release notes.  The Router Upgrade
> notification elements in the UI, introduced in 4.3 are also broken
> (this should possibly be a -1 as it could result in installs running
> with the wrong version of the VRs without realising)
>
> Notes:
>
> 2x XenServer 6.2 in a single Cluster
> NFS Primary Storage x2
> System VM Template from
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm64/
> lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template-4
> .4-2014-09-30-xen.vhd.bz2 Clean install of 4.4.1 to single management
> server on CentOS 6.5 with MySQL installed locally Created new Zone,
> POD, Cluster, Sec Storage, Hosts, Pri Storage all via API Updated
> Various Global Settings via API Created Domains and Accounts via API
> Deployed VMs for user account as Root and configured network Egress
> rules via API Deployed VM as root via UI Live Migrated VMs between
> Hosts Offline Migrated (VM stopped) Root Volume between Pri Storage
> via UI - cloudstack service crashed! (Install is running inside
> VirtualBox and Management VM is also NFS Server so added more RAM and
> tried again) - repeated test after a manual clean up and it was
> successful Live Migrated (VM running) Root Volume between Pri Storage
> via UI Disabled / Re-enabled Host Adding / removing NICs and changing
> default etc via UI Deployed new VPC, with two tiers, added VM to each
> tier, setup ACLs etc via API
>
>
> Then I did an upgrade test of a 4.3.1 system using the latest system
> VM template from Jenkins (this system was originally built on 4.3.0
> and upgraded to 4.3.1, before being upgraded to 4.4.1) New System VM
> template installed OK
>
> The steps in the release notes about downloading vhd-utils for
> XenServer are misleading.  If you blindly follow the steps the simply
> end up with a 2nd copy 'vhd-utils.1' as this is an upgrade and you
> will already have vhd-utils on the management server, at least if
> upgrading from a recent release such as 4.3.x.
>
> If vhd-utils needs replacing we need to be specific about removing the
> old one.  I don’t think it actually needs replacing, it's just in a
> different location to older installs, but the 4.3 upgrade guide still
> has this step in it. (I can't remember which release changed the
> location)
>
> The MySQL Statements for the manual upgrade of the template are also
> incorrect as they do not include the DB name so fail
>
> e.g.
> select id,name from vm_template where name = 'systemvm-xenserver-4.4';
>
> should be
> select id,name from cloud.vm_template where name =
> 'systemvm-xenserver-4.4';
>
> The same with the following commands
>
> update vm_template set type='SYSTEM' where id='';
> update vm_instance set vm_template_id = '' where
> type='ConsoleProxy' and hypervisor_type = 'xenserver'; update
> vm_instance set vm_template_id = '' where
> type='SecondaryStorageVm' and hypervisor_type = 'xenserver'; update
> configuration set value = 'systemvm-xenserver-4.4' where name =
> 'router.template.xen';
>
> should be
>
> update cloud.vm_template set type='SYSTEM' where id=' #1>'; update cloud.vm_instance set v

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Great, glad to hear it was an easy fix.

Now however I have found another problem.  In the UI if I go to 
Infrastructure/Clusters/cluster1/and then choose the settings tab, I get an 
error and no information is displayed.

Can others please check this to see if it is a unique problem to me or a common 
issue.  This is on my upgraded install, I'll the check the clean install in a 
few minutes once its power up.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 01 October 2014 15:29
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sebastien Goasguen
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC20140924T2100

ok, fixed it ,  /latest is pointing on the master branch for the RN git repo. 
so it's not reflecting the "latest" version of our product.
I've disable the /latest version so URL  will default to 4.4.0 RN  for the 
moment, and the 4.4.1 RN is the correct one.

Seb, do you see a problem disabling  master and latest build in RTD ?

make more sense?

PL

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Pierre-Luc,
>
> Nope, I was deffinately looking at 4.4.1 release notes, complete with
> sections titled 'Issues fixed in 4.4.1' etc
>
>
> http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
> ade-4.3.html
>
> I would include a screen shot of the page but it will get stripped
> from the e-mail
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: 01 October 2014 14:49
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch
> 4.4-RC20140924T2100
>
> Geoff,
>
> Could it be possible you've followed 4.4.0 upgrade path ? because we
> don't have to perform any MySQL query when upgrading to 4.4.1,
> otherwise the RN is not correct.
> the current RN for 4.4.1 is:
>
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en
> /4.4.1/  (not /latest yet as it's not release yet)
>
> for the vhd-utils, I wasn't sure if it was making sense to keep it on
> all upgrade path, thanks for the comment, make sense to remove if from
> upgrade 4.3.x and probably 4.2.x as it should already be in place.
>
>
> PL
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > +0  only because of the issues in the release notes, a clean install
> > +and
> > an upgrade from 4.3.1 went OK, but only because I know how to do it,
> > it would not work if I followed the release notes.  The Router
> > Upgrade notification elements in the UI, introduced in 4.3 are also
> > broken (this should possibly be a -1 as it could result in installs
> > running with the wrong version of the VRs without realising)
> >
> > Notes:
> >
> > 2x XenServer 6.2 in a single Cluster NFS Primary Storage x2 System
> > VM Template from
> > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm6
> > 4/
> > lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template
> > -4
> > .4-2014-09-30-xen.vhd.bz2 Clean install of 4.4.1 to single
> > management server on CentOS 6.5 with MySQL installed locally Created
> > new Zone, POD, Cluster, Sec Storage, Hosts, Pri Storage all via API
> > Updated Various Global Settings via API Created Domains and Accounts
> > via API Deployed VMs for user account as Root and configured network
> > Egress rules via API Deployed VM as root via UI Live Migrated VMs
> > between Hosts Offline Migrated (VM stopped) Root Volume between Pri
> > Storage via UI - cloudstack service crashed! (Install is running
> > inside VirtualBox and Management VM is also NFS Server so added more
> > RAM and tried again) - repeated test after a manual clean up and it
> > was successful Live Migrated (VM running) Root Volume between Pri
> > Storage via UI Disabled / Re-enabled Host Adding / removing NICs and
> > changing default etc via UI Deployed new VPC, with two tiers, added
> > VM to each tier, setup ACLs etc via API
> >
> >
> > Then I did an upgrade test of a 4.3.1 system using the latest system
> > VM template from Jenkins (this system was originally built on 4.3.0
> > and upgraded to 4.3.1, before being upgraded to 4.4.1) New System VM
> > template installed OK
> >
> > The steps in the release

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100

[Geoff Higginbottom]

The Cluster Details UI issue is only present on my upgraded system, a clean 
install of 4.4.1 correctly shows the value.

Need someone else who upgraded to also check

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 01 October 2014 16:16
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sebastien Goasguen
Subject: RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC20140924T2100

Great, glad to hear it was an easy fix.

Now however I have found another problem.  In the UI if I go to 
Infrastructure/Clusters/cluster1/and then choose the settings tab, I get an 
error and no information is displayed.

Can others please check this to see if it is a unique problem to me or a common 
issue.  This is on my upgraded install, I'll the check the clean install in a 
few minutes once its power up.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 01 October 2014 15:29
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sebastien Goasguen
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC20140924T2100

ok, fixed it ,  /latest is pointing on the master branch for the RN git repo. 
so it's not reflecting the "latest" version of our product.
I've disable the /latest version so URL  will default to 4.4.0 RN  for the 
moment, and the 4.4.1 RN is the correct one.

Seb, do you see a problem disabling  master and latest build in RTD ?

make more sense?

PL

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Pierre-Luc,
>
> Nope, I was deffinately looking at 4.4.1 release notes, complete with
> sections titled 'Issues fixed in 4.4.1' etc
>
>
> http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgr
> ade-4.3.html
>
> I would include a screen shot of the page but it will get stripped
> from the e-mail
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: 01 October 2014 14:49
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch
> 4.4-RC20140924T2100
>
> Geoff,
>
> Could it be possible you've followed 4.4.0 upgrade path ? because we
> don't have to perform any MySQL query when upgrading to 4.4.1,
> otherwise the RN is not correct.
> the current RN for 4.4.1 is:
>
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en
> /4.4.1/  (not /latest yet as it's not release yet)
>
> for the vhd-utils, I wasn't sure if it was making sense to keep it on
> all upgrade path, thanks for the comment, make sense to remove if from
> upgrade 4.3.x and probably 4.2.x as it should already be in place.
>
>
> PL
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > +0  only because of the issues in the release notes, a clean install
> > +and
> > an upgrade from 4.3.1 went OK, but only because I know how to do it,
> > it would not work if I followed the release notes.  The Router
> > Upgrade notification elements in the UI, introduced in 4.3 are also
> > broken (this should possibly be a -1 as it could result in installs
> > running with the wrong version of the VRs without realising)
> >
> > Notes:
> >
> > 2x XenServer 6.2 in a single Cluster NFS Primary Storage x2 System
> > VM Template from
> > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.4/job/cloudstack-4.4-systemvm6
> > 4/
> > lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/tools/appliance/dist/systemvm64template
> > -4
> > .4-2014-09-30-xen.vhd.bz2 Clean install of 4.4.1 to single
> > management server on CentOS 6.5 with MySQL installed locally Created
> > new Zone, POD, Cluster, Sec Storage, Hosts, Pri Storage all via API
> > Updated Various Global Settings via API Created Domains and Accounts
> > via API Deployed VMs for user account as Root and configured network
> > Egress rules via API Deployed VM as root via UI Live Migrated VMs
> > between Hosts Offline Migrated (VM stopped) Root Volume between Pri
> > Storage via UI - cloudstack service crashed! (Install is running
> > inside VirtualBox and Management VM is also NFS Server so added more
> > RAM and tried again) - repeated test after a manual clean up and it
> > was successful Live Migrated (VM running) Root V

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100

[Geoff Higginbottom]

This has to be a blocker then as a system which is upgraded from 4.2 or earlier 
will lose its Overprovisioning settings as they get reset to 1, and you have to 
go the Cluster Settings to reset them back to the value they were pre-upgrade, 
if you can't you could end up with the situation where Customer VMs will not 
restart.

The only alternative is to force users to upgrade to 4.3.1, reset the 
overprovisioning on the Cluster, then upgrade to 4.4.1, but even then they 
cannot make any changes via the UI (assume API will work)

Changing my vote -1 until this is resolved

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 01 October 2014 16:20
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Sebastien Goasguen
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC20140924T2100

yep, this is the JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7219

unfortunately it hasn't been fixed in 4.4.1 :-(


PL

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Great, glad to hear it was an easy fix.
>
> Now however I have found another problem.  In the UI if I go to
> Infrastructure/Clusters/cluster1/and then choose the settings tab, I
> get an error and no information is displayed.
>
> Can others please check this to see if it is a unique problem to me or
> a common issue.  This is on my upgraded install, I'll the check the
> clean install in a few minutes once its power up.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> Sent: 01 October 2014 15:29
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sebastien Goasguen
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch
> 4.4-RC20140924T2100
>
> ok, fixed it ,  /latest is pointing on the master branch for the RN
> git repo. so it's not reflecting the "latest" version of our product.
> I've disable the /latest version so URL  will default to 4.4.0 RN  for
> the moment, and the 4.4.1 RN is the correct one.
>
> Seb, do you see a problem disabling  master and latest build in RTD ?
>
> make more sense?
>
> PL
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Pierre-Luc,
> >
> > Nope, I was deffinately looking at 4.4.1 release notes, complete
> > with sections titled 'Issues fixed in 4.4.1' etc
> >
> >
> > http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/up
> > gr
> > ade-4.3.html
> >
> > I would include a screen shot of the page but it will get stripped
> > from the e-mail
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
> >
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> > Sent: 01 October 2014 14:49
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch
> > 4.4-RC20140924T2100
> >
> > Geoff,
> >
> > Could it be possible you've followed 4.4.0 upgrade path ? because we
> > don't have to perform any MySQL query when upgrading to 4.4.1,
> > otherwise the RN is not correct.
> > the current RN for 4.4.1 is:
> >
> > http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/
> > en /4.4.1/  (not /latest yet as it's not release yet)
> >
> > for the vhd-utils, I wasn't sure if it was making sense to keep it
> > on all upgrade path, thanks for the comment, make sense to remove if
> > from upgrade 4.3.x and probably 4.2.x as it should already be in place.
> >
> >
> > PL
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Geoff Higginbottom <
> > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +0  only because of the issues in the release notes, a clean
> > > +install and
> > > an upgrade from 4.3.1 went OK, but only because I know how to do
> > > it, it would not work if I followed the release notes.  The Router
> > > Upgrade notification elements in the UI, introduced in 4.3 are
> > > also broken (this should possibly be a -1 as it could result in
> > > installs running with the wrong version of the VRs without
> > > realising)
> > >
> > &g

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100

[Geoff Higginbottom]

oProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:721)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2274)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2014-10-01 16:42:03,655 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-4:ctx-4ad4a1c0 
ctx-8252ed09) ===END===  192.168.56.1 -- GET  
command=listConfigurations&clusterid=b5d6ae07-9520-4a51-8818-21b9e07df155&response=json&sessionkey=dP%2B5tKebkhdRjj4tbd26v1hfqT8%3D&listAll=true&page=1&pagesize=20&_=1412239888495

And here a log extract generated when I ran the cloudmonkey command list 
configurations clusterid=b5d6ae07-9520-4a51-8818-21b9e07df155

2014-10-01 16:43:49,655 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-9:ctx-736367f3) 
===START===  127.0.0.1 -- GET  
apiKey=z3S1CcFSp7NYwpLi9BqLAUPxK5C5-XSzmuSs3sBeSEyK6uGa7MiHfmMSx3FyK2zrkDKG9RvyTYJEk3qFjAmGXA&clusterid=b5d6ae07-9520-4a51-8818-21b9e07df155&command=listConfigurations&response=json&signature=IMqMyBRaae8Tp2A2U0fzXADtrVU%3D
2014-10-01 16:43:49,734 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-9:ctx-736367f3 
ctx-70a35621 ctx-ff98e132) unhandled exception executing api command: 
[Ljava.lang.String;@f0c9b70
java.lang.NullPointerException
at 
com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.searchForConfigurations(ManagementServerImpl.java:1706)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
at 
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy209.searchForConfigurations(Unknown Source)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.config.ListCfgsByCmd.execute(ListCfgsByCmd.java:132)
at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:141)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:682)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:511)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:330)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.access$000(ApiServlet.java:54)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:118)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:115)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:77)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:233)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:191)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:555)
at 
org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:298)
at 
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor.java:889)
at 
org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:721)
at 
org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:2274)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
2014-10-01 16:43:49,742 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet] (catalina-exec-9:ctx-736367f3 
ctx-70a35621 ctx-ff98e132) ===END===  127.0.0.1 -- GET  
apiKey=z3S1CcFSp7NYwpLi9BqLAUPxK5C5-XSzmuSs3sBeSEyK6uGa7

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20140924T2100

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Daan,

Did  complete reboot of management server but issue persists, API and UI both 
failing.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 October 2014 10:05
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC20140924T2100

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> However when running the list configurations command again the result
> was the same, and the UI was still failing
>

​seems not, but just to make sure this is not a caching issue, did you restart 
the ms in between, Geoff?​



--
Daan
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 2 in branch 4.4-RC20141006T1046

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Tested the upgrade from 4.3.0 to 4.4.1 RC2 and post upgrade I'm still unable to 
view cluster info so this is still a blocker for me.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 08 October 2014 12:18
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 2 in branch 
4.4-RC20141006T1046

Pierre-Luc the warnings are just warnings. The stack trace points to 
configuration not correctly being set to a reasonable default when absent.
I will have to look deeper into that. $dayjob+#live permitting it will take me 
till after the weekend.

Unless we find a workaround I am going to consider this a blocker.

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Did test the upgrade from 4.3.1 to 4.4.1 (4.4-RC20141006T1046)
>
>
> Still got the "ERROR" at the cluster settings:
> Catalina.out:
> WARN  [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
> (catalina-exec-2:ctx-601d8ad4
> ctx-677eec17) Received unknown parameters for command listConfigurations.
> Unknown parameters : listall
> ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (catalina-exec-2:ctx-601d8ad4 ctx-677eec17)
> unhandled exception executing api command:
> [Ljava.lang.String;@421fb921 java.lang.NullPointerException at
>
> com.cloud.server.ManagementServerImpl.searchForConfigurations(Manageme
> ntServerImpl.java:1707) at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at
>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.j
> ava:57)
> at
>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccess
> orImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at
>
> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflectio
> n(AopUtils.java:317)
> at
>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoi
> npoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
> at
>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(R
> eflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
> at
>
> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke
> (ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
> at
>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(R
> eflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> at
>
> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamic
> AopProxy.java:204) at
> com.sun.proxy.$Proxy209.searchForConfigurations(Unknown Source) at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.config.ListCfgsByCmd.execute(L
> istCfgsByCmd.java:132) at
> com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:141)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:682)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:511)
> at
> com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:330)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.access$000(ApiServlet.java:54)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:118)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.cal
> l(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callW
> ithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
> at
>
> org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWi
> thContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:115)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doGet(ApiServlet.java:77)
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:617)
> at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:717)
> at
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(Appli
> cationFilterChain.java:290)
> at
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFi
> lterChain.java:206)
> at
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperVa
> lve.java:233)
> at
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextVa
> lve.java:191)
> at
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.ja
> va:127)
> at
>
> org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.ja
> va:102)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:5
> 55)
> at
>
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValv
> e.java:109)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java
> :298)
> at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProcessor.process(Http11NioProcessor
> .java:889)
> at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.pro

RE: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 3 in branch 4.4-RC20141014T2316

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Tested Advanced Networking with XenServer 6.2

Previous Cluster Details issue has been resolved

Minor bug in the UI with regards to VM Snapshots. If a VM is stopped, and I go 
to take a VM Snapshot I still get the option of 'Snapshot Memory' which 
obviously is not possible and results in an error message.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 16 October 2014 02:01
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44]Apache CloudStack 4.4.1 RC 3 in branch 
4.4-RC20141014T2316

+1 (binding) ,  found some inconsistency on the ui like the "add" button
for tags. but it's fixed in 4.5 branch.

Did tests the upgrade issue of cluster settngs, and vpn-client on VPC  with 
OSX.  some minor tests.

hypervisor: xenserver 6.2




*Pierre-Luc DION*
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855.652.5683

*CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6 w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_


On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> +0
>
> On a basic zone deployment I seem to be having issues accessing the
> console proxy.
>
> From what I can work out this has something to do with the iptables on
> the hypervisor for security groups.
> Flushing the iptables on the hypervisor running the console vm fixes
> the issue but breaks all the security groups.
>
> Can anybody else confirm if they experience a similar issue? I did two
> clean deployments happened both times.
> Everything else seemed to work fine.
>
> On 15 October 2014 12:13, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Based on the commits that have happened my old tests are still valid.
> >
> > Wido
> >
> > On 10/14/2014 11:23 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > As all open blocking issues were reported fixed today, I've
> > > created a
> > 4.4.1
> > > release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
> > >
> > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/heads/4.4-RC20141014T2316
> > > Commit: 8db506b536f3139250d33df571c98c1c3fa83650
> > >
> > > List of changes:
> > >
> >
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en
> /latest/
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.1/
> > >
> > > PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > >
> > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > >
> > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why) ​may for(tun/c)e​ be with us,
> > >
> >
>
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC2

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1

The XenServer refactoring has resulted in the parameters for the API command 
addTrafficType changing from xennetworklabel to xenservernetworklabel, and as a 
result all previous tooling is now broken.  The result is when I try to deploy 
and Advanced Zone using XenServer via CloudMonkey Scripts none of the traffic 
labels get allocated correctly, resulting in a non-functioning zone.

I believe we should be supporting backwards compatibility for API calls, and my 
concern is that there are other APIs which may have been affected by this 
refactoring.

FYI I have been testing CloudPlatform 4.5.0 and it does not have this change.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 02 February 2015 03:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC2

-1

A build blocker was fixed - the issue was after upgrade usage server failed to 
start. Fixed on latest 4.5 now (CLOUDSTACK-7316). Please still continue to test.

> On 02-Feb-2015, at 7:42 am, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Did test upgrade from 4.2.1 with XenServer 6.2,  Management-server
> running on CentOs 6.6.
>
> The Release-notes as been updated.
>
> PL
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>
>> Did upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.5.0-snapshot  with XenServer 6.2.
>>
>> Upgrade went smoothly,  systemvm upgraded well so far I've only found
>> 2 missing label in the UI:  ( label.add.isolated.guest.network,
>> label.password.reset.confirm).
>> We need make sure to provide the systemvm template with the commit:
>> 805704721fbbbcce7aecfaa8aa214cfc8ab3bdfc
>> which should provide a working management VPN to Guest Network and VPC.
>>
>> I'm still testing over the weekend...
>>
>>
>> For the Release-Notes,  this jira filter: 12329800  does list 4.5.0
>> new features and Improvement, from it there is not much to say  for
>> the RN, but considering the huge amount of bug fixes contained in
>> 4.5.0, does anyone have insight on new stuff in this release to spice
>> up the What's new section?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It definitely wouldn't break my heart if we had until Monday close
>>> of business (say, Pacific Time) to vote.
>>>
>>> I haven't been able to focus as much on testing this build as I
>>> would have liked and could use the weekend.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Rohit Yadav
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please note the RC2 works fine on fresh installations but failed on
>>>> upgrade for a packaging related issue (fixable manually
>>>> CLOUDSTACK-7316, this has been fixed on 4.5 now).
>>>>
>>>> Before voting I want to confirm if anyone can reproduce the following:
>>>>
>>>> - Register new 4.5 template, upgrade from 4.3.2 to 4.5.0 RC2 and
>>>> destroy old systemvms
>>>> - New secondary storage VM starts but agent status gets stuck in
>>>> connecting state sometimes. After this I'm unable to register new
>>>> templates though starting VMs using existing templates work.
>>>> - Rapid logs are seen:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8183 (I'm not sure
>>>> how to fix this, still exploring)
>>>> - Likely an environment issue, console proxy did not work in
>>>> advance zone for me though it worked for me in basic zone
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 27 January 2015 09:53 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following
>>>>> artifacts up for a vote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=
>>>>> tree;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150127T0405;hb=4.5-RC20150127T0405
>>>>> Commit: dbfb78d4b8ad074f602540002e8678432d258bb5
>>>>>
>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>>>> location):
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc2/
>>>>>
>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 6FE50F1C):
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> V

RE: [DISCUSS] Important: XenServer labels reverted for backward compatibility

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Tim,

The issue affects new deployments using existing tooling which references the 
original api parameter of xentrafficlabel.

It will also affect any tooling which may update the labels, although this is a 
rare occurance.

The main issue is backwards compatibility, but also a concern that there may be 
other areas where the api parameters have changed from xen to xenserver.

Anyone who has developed a custom UI may run into issues.

Is there a list of all the API changes that have been made?

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>

From: Tim Mackey [mailto:tmac...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 February 2015 11:05
To: Rohit Yadav
Cc: Geoff Higginbottom; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Important: XenServer labels reverted for backward 
compatibility


Rohit,  how does the issue manifest itself?  I ask because I thought I'd taken 
care of every scenario during upgrade.
On Feb 2, 2015 10:52 AM, "Rohit Yadav" 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Hi Tim,

Geoff found a issue today that breaks backward compatibility for
XenServer users.

Until 4.4, XenServer traffic label was xennetworklabel but in 4.5/master
it is xenservernetworklabel. To keep backward compatibility I'm
reverting such changes introduced in
a8212d9ef458dd7ac64b021e6fa33fcf64b3cce0 (xenserver plugin refactoring).
When in future we'll have a separate xen project plugin (based on
libvirt or what have you) we should add a new label like
xenprojectnetworklabel but let's keep the old one for backward
compatibility's sake.

It could be valid change, if so please advise any other way to maintain
backward compatibility? Please comment if this is okay?

The issue has been fixed on 4.5/master now:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8190

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | 
rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Blog: bhaisaab.org<http://bhaisaab.org> | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & 
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build/>>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue S

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC2

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Sorry Folks, another issue in 4.5.0 RC2

I had recently become aware that Live VM Migration when using Local Storage 
with XenServer was broken in 4.3.1 & 4.3.2 releases of ACS (it works in 4.3.0)

I have not tested in any 4.4 branch but was recently deploying a CloudPlatform 
system and noted it had been fixed in CCP 4.5.0 so assumed Citrix had submitted 
the fix into ACS Master but unfortunately it still appears to be broken in ACS 
4.5.0

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Geoff Higginbottom
Sent: 02 February 2015 10:33
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC2

-1

The XenServer refactoring has resulted in the parameters for the API command 
addTrafficType changing from xennetworklabel to xenservernetworklabel, and as a 
result all previous tooling is now broken.  The result is when I try to deploy 
and Advanced Zone using XenServer via CloudMonkey Scripts none of the traffic 
labels get allocated correctly, resulting in a non-functioning zone.

I believe we should be supporting backwards compatibility for API calls, and my 
concern is that there are other APIs which may have been affected by this 
refactoring.

FYI I have been testing CloudPlatform 4.5.0 and it does not have this change.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 02 February 2015 03:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC2

-1

A build blocker was fixed - the issue was after upgrade usage server failed to 
start. Fixed on latest 4.5 now (CLOUDSTACK-7316). Please still continue to test.

> On 02-Feb-2015, at 7:42 am, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Did test upgrade from 4.2.1 with XenServer 6.2,  Management-server
> running on CentOs 6.6.
>
> The Release-notes as been updated.
>
> PL
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Pierre-Luc Dion  wrote:
>
>> Did upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.5.0-snapshot  with XenServer 6.2.
>>
>> Upgrade went smoothly,  systemvm upgraded well so far I've only found
>> 2 missing label in the UI:  ( label.add.isolated.guest.network,
>> label.password.reset.confirm).
>> We need make sure to provide the systemvm template with the commit:
>> 805704721fbbbcce7aecfaa8aa214cfc8ab3bdfc
>> which should provide a working management VPN to Guest Network and VPC.
>>
>> I'm still testing over the weekend...
>>
>>
>> For the Release-Notes,  this jira filter: 12329800  does list 4.5.0
>> new features and Improvement, from it there is not much to say  for
>> the RN, but considering the huge amount of bug fixes contained in
>> 4.5.0, does anyone have insight on new stuff in this release to spice
>> up the What's new section?
>>
>> thanks
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It definitely wouldn't break my heart if we had until Monday close
>>> of business (say, Pacific Time) to vote.
>>>
>>> I haven't been able to focus as much on testing this build as I
>>> would have liked and could use the weekend.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 29, 2015, Rohit Yadav
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please note the RC2 works fine on fresh installations but failed on
>>>> upgrade for a packaging related issue (fixable manually
>>>> CLOUDSTACK-7316, this has been fixed on 4.5 now).
>>>>
>>>> Before voting I want to confirm if anyone can reproduce the following:
>>>>
>>>> - Register new 4.5 template, upgrade from 4.3.2 to 4.5.0 RC2 and
>>>> destroy old systemvms
>>>> - New secondary storage VM starts but agent status gets stuck in
>>>> connecting state sometimes. After this I'm unable to register new
>>>> templates though starting VMs using existing templates work.
>>>> - Rapid logs are seen:
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8183 (I'm not sure
>>>> how to fix this, still exploring)
>>>> - Likely an environment issue, console proxy did not work in
>>>> advance zone for me though it worked for me in basic zone
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 27 January 2015 09:53 AM, David Nalley wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've created a 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following
>>>>> artifacts up for a vote:
&g

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1

When trying to add XenServers to a new 'Basic Zone without Security Groups" the 
Hosts remain in 'Alert' state because they are running OVS and not Linux Bridge.

There is no requirement to revert to Linux Bridge unless you are using Security 
Groups, so this test is incorrect.

In 4.3.x this was not the case.

If try and upgrade a 4.3.2 system which uses XenServer 6.2 with OVS enabled, 
all Hosts remain in Alert state as 4.5.0 is expecting Linux Bridge

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 09 February 2015 13:27
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3

Yes, with -1s no point voting further.

Tested local storage in Advance zone.
Live VM migration is working with local storage (Xen 6.5 cluster) that was 
broken in RC1, and RC2.

-abhi


> On 09-Feb-2015, at 6:27 pm, Ian Duffy  wrote:
>
> +0 (no point voting with -1s above)
>
> Tested this using Devcloud4 on an advanced zone worked without issue,
> environment came up, template downloaded was able to create a VM and a
> egress rule to allow outbound connectivity. Great to see the xen
> server networking label stuff fixed, this caused some issues for me
> with automating things with marvin (hence why devcloud4 advance didn't
> work with 4.4).
>
> If anyone is interested: (assumes you've read the docs for devcloud4,
> installed berkshelf/chef-dk, setup the vboxnet adapters)
>
> git clone g...@github.com:imduffy15/devcloud4.git
> cd binary-installation-advanced
> vagrant up
>
>
> On 9 February 2015 at 09:02, Nux!  wrote:
>> Daan,
>>
>> That's fine. There were no critical issues to be addressed really by a 4.4.3 
>> AFAIK.
>> Let's get 4.5 right. :)
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Daan Hoogland" 
>>> To: "dev" 
>>> Sent: Monday, 9 February, 2015 07:29:13
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3
>>
>>> Gents,
>>>
>>> 4.4.3 vote was never formally closed. Do we need to continue? If so
>>> I will create a new rc!
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>  wrote:
>>>> FYI: I have resolved and closed out
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8233.
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Here is the newly created bug:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8233
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> -1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marcus and I are working on a fix for not being able to create
>>>>>> VMs on KVM due to kvmclock not being recognized by older versions of 
>>>>>> Libvirt.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have most of the testing done. I should be done with the rest
>>>>>> of it today and can check this code in.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think we have a ticket for this, so I'll go ahead and create one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks (and sorry for the need for a subsequent RC)!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 12:01 AM, David Nalley  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, with the
>>>>>>> following artifacts up for a vote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=short
>>>>>>> log;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150208T0646
>>>>>>> Commit: 187935a0e3c68e01ed33a8f7f0e6d69e6cdb0aca
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>> location):
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc3/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>>>>>>&g

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Pierre-Luc,

You are right Basic Networking 'With' security Groups requires Linux Bridge, 
and will not work with OVS.

This is a Basic Zone 'Without' security groups so OVS should work.  Linux 
Bridge is only required if you use Security Groups.

I know of a CloudStack install running a Basic Zone without Security Groups on 
4.3.x and they are using OVS without any problems.

I did a test upgrade to 4.5.0 and the Hosts stay in Alert State.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 09 February 2015 13:48
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3

Geoff, as far as I know Basic Networking with Security group never worked with 
XenServer + OVS, only with Bridge, please correct me if I'm wrong.




On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> -1
>
> When trying to add XenServers to a new 'Basic Zone without Security
> Groups" the Hosts remain in 'Alert' state because they are running OVS
> and not Linux Bridge.
>
> There is no requirement to revert to Linux Bridge unless you are using
> Security Groups, so this test is incorrect.
>
> In 4.3.x this was not the case.
>
> If try and upgrade a 4.3.2 system which uses XenServer 6.2 with OVS
> enabled, all Hosts remain in Alert state as 4.5.0 is expecting Linux
> Bridge
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 09 February 2015 13:27
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3
>
> Yes, with -1s no point voting further.
>
> Tested local storage in Advance zone.
> Live VM migration is working with local storage (Xen 6.5 cluster) that
> was broken in RC1, and RC2.
>
> -abhi
>
>
> > On 09-Feb-2015, at 6:27 pm, Ian Duffy  wrote:
> >
> > +0 (no point voting with -1s above)
> >
> > Tested this using Devcloud4 on an advanced zone worked without
> > issue, environment came up, template downloaded was able to create a
> > VM and a egress rule to allow outbound connectivity. Great to see
> > the xen server networking label stuff fixed, this caused some issues
> > for me with automating things with marvin (hence why devcloud4
> > advance didn't work with 4.4).
> >
> > If anyone is interested: (assumes you've read the docs for
> > devcloud4, installed berkshelf/chef-dk, setup the vboxnet adapters)
> >
> > git clone g...@github.com:imduffy15/devcloud4.git
> > cd binary-installation-advanced
> > vagrant up
> >
> >
> > On 9 February 2015 at 09:02, Nux!  wrote:
> >> Daan,
> >>
> >> That's fine. There were no critical issues to be addressed really
> >> by a
> 4.4.3 AFAIK.
> >> Let's get 4.5 right. :)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
> >>
> >> Nux!
> >> www.nux.ro
> >>
> >> - Original Message -
> >>> From: "Daan Hoogland" 
> >>> To: "dev" 
> >>> Sent: Monday, 9 February, 2015 07:29:13
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC3
> >>
> >>> Gents,
> >>>
> >>> 4.4.3 vote was never formally closed. Do we need to continue? If
> >>> so I will create a new rc!
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:51 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>  wrote:
> >>>> FYI: I have resolved and closed out
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8233.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Mike Tutkowski
> >>>>  >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Here is the newly created bug:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8233
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 9:37 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> >>>>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Marcus and I are working on a fix for not being able to create
> >>>>>> VMs on KVM due to kvmclock not being recognized by older
> >>>>>> versions
> of Libv

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Ian,

I always have a standatd set of commands at the beginning of every script 
defining  the required settings such as color false etc.

If I need to use a specific setting such as table output, I always set it back 
to default as soon as possible within the script.

This is just my methodology but I make very heavy use of cloudmonkey scripts 
and it has not let me down yet.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 
4HS


On 27 Feb 2015, at 23:20, Ian Forde 
mailto:ifo...@marketo.com>> wrote:

Question - Currently, options set in Cloudmonkey seem to persist into
~/.cloudmonkey/config.  For example, if one uses cloudmonkey
interactively, and changes the display setting from json to table (without
putting the setting back to json when finished), any cron jobs that depend
on the output set to json will break.  (Unless they explicitly set that
option in their cron script.)

I was wondering if that was a feature?  I suppose I could always have
separate cloudmonkey config files for different scripts, but I was
wondering what other folks do…

 -I (LLAP)

On 2/27/15, 1:27 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek"
mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>> 
wrote:

+1
I have been using cloud monkey to bootstrap a cloud with advance zone.

-abhi

On 27-Feb-2015, at 11:33 am, Rohit Yadav 
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
wrote:

Hi Lucian/Geoff,

Yeah, I had included both users@ and dev@ ML so please reply to dev@ or
both to get it on dev@ :)

On 26-Feb-2015, at 9:11 pm, Nux! mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> wrote:

+1 from me, as well.


PS: shouldn't this also go to dev@ ?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro>

- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Higginbottom" 
mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>>
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, 26 February, 2015 15:19:46
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4

+1

Have been using on a daily basis for a number of weeks using both
command line
and heavily in many different scripts.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 26 February 2015 10:56
To: dev; us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4

Hi All,

CloudMonkey master branch has been rather stable since last two
months.
It has been already tested by many since the last three 5.3.1 RC
candidates.
Please take some time to do basic tests and vote for a speedy
release. Thanks.

I've created a 5.3.1 release candidate of CloudMonkey, with the
following
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=
shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
Commit: 7b66d39376d2711443a4b91af8375bdf3ae690b5

List of changes:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=
blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

For ease of testing, the CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4 candidate is uploaded
on PYPI and
can be installed using:

pip install cloudmonkey==5.3.1

Though the PYPI page will have 5.3.0 as default until we unhide 5.3.1
package on
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cloudmonkey

For usage and other information please refer to this wiki:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+cloud
monkey+CLI

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com<mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>
Blog: bhaisaab.org<http://bhaisaab.org> | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
services

IaaS Cloud Design &
Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack In

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Adding in Rohit to answer the CloudMonkey development question

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 
4HS


On 27 Feb 2015, at 23:36, Ian Forde 
mailto:ifo...@marketo.com>> wrote:

Thanks for the feedback Geoff.  I’ll have to update my scripts to reflect
that.  Are there any plans to change cloudmonkey’s behavior in that regard?

 -I

On 2/27/15, 3:31 PM, "Geoff Higginbottom"
mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>> 
wrote:

Hi Ian,

I always have a standatd set of commands at the beginning of every script
defining  the required settings such as color false etc.

If I need to use a specific setting such as table output, I always set it
back to default as soon as possible within the script.

This is just my methodology but I make very heavy use of cloudmonkey
scripts and it has not let me down yet.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603
0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com><mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>
| www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com> |
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N
4HS


On 27 Feb 2015, at 23:20, Ian Forde
mailto:ifo...@marketo.com><mailto:ifo...@marketo.com>> 
wrote:

Question - Currently, options set in Cloudmonkey seem to persist into
~/.cloudmonkey/config.  For example, if one uses cloudmonkey
interactively, and changes the display setting from json to table (without
putting the setting back to json when finished), any cron jobs that depend
on the output set to json will break.  (Unless they explicitly set that
option in their cron script.)

I was wondering if that was a feature?  I suppose I could always have
separate cloudmonkey config files for different scripts, but I was
wondering what other folks do…

-I (LLAP)

On 2/27/15, 1:27 AM, "Abhinandan Prateek"
mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com><mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

+1
I have been using cloud monkey to bootstrap a cloud with advance zone.

-abhi

On 27-Feb-2015, at 11:33 am, Rohit Yadav
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com><mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>>
wrote:

Hi Lucian/Geoff,

Yeah, I had included both users@ and dev@ ML so please reply to dev@ or
both to get it on dev@ :)

On 26-Feb-2015, at 9:11 pm, Nux! 
mailto:n...@li.nux.ro><mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>>
wrote:

+1 from me, as well.


PS: shouldn't this also go to dev@ ?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro><http://www.nux.ro>

- Original Message -
From: "Geoff Higginbottom"
mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com><mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>

To: 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, 26 February, 2015 15:19:46
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4

+1

Have been using on a daily basis for a number of weeks using both
command line
and heavily in many different scripts.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com><mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 26 February 2015 10:56
To: dev; 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4

Hi All,

CloudMonkey master branch has been rather stable since last two
months.
It has been already tested by many since the last three 5.3.1 RC
candidates.
Please take some time to do basic tests and vote for a speedy
release. Thanks.

I've created a 5.3.1 release candidate of CloudMonkey, with the
following
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=
shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
Commit: 7b66d39376d2711443a4b91af8375bdf3ae690b5

List of changes:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=
blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.1/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

For ease of testing, the CloudMonkey 5.3.1 RC4 candidate is uploaded
on PYPI and

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

[Geoff Higginbottom]

All,

Unfortunately I've been travelling and not had chance to test fully.

I did manage to test last night and found this bug is still present which I 
consider a Blocker.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel

I know we have formally voted yes but we need to address this as lots of folks 
are using VPCs

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 
4HS


On 5 Mar 2015, at 16:14, David Nalley mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> 
wrote:

Hi all,

After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.0 *passes* with
4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
Marcus
Pierre-Luc
Mike
Chip

+1 (non binding)
Rohit
Nux

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating.

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out, likely for Tuesday.

--David


On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, David Nalley 
mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote:
Hi All,

I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.5-RC20150302T1625
Commit: c066f0455fa126a2b41cccefa25b56421a445d99

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc4/

PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Pierre,

This issue effectively removes the control for users to review their existing 
VPC ACL rules, and whilst you can add new, you have no idea what the settings 
are with respect to the CIDR after you have added it.

This bug affects the API and UI, always returning a blank CIDR list.

Given the problems with the 4.4.0 release, we do not want to release another 
new version with a known bug that was detected during the RC process but 
unfortunately not fixed.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 06 March 2015 14:32
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.0 RC4

Can we release 4.5.0, and see how it could be fixed in 4.5.1 ?





On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Unfortunately I've been travelling and not had chance to test fully.
>
> I did manage to test last night and found this bug is still present
> which I consider a Blocker.
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8248?page=com.atlassi
> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>
> I know we have formally voted yes but we need to address this as lots
> of folks are using VPCs
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 +442036030540> | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbottom@shapeblue.c
> om>
> | www.shapeblue.com |
> | Twitter:@cloudstackguru<
> https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
>
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N
> 4HS
>
>
> On 5 Mar 2015, at 16:14, David Nalley
> mailto:da...@gnsa.us>>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.5.0 *passes* with
> 4 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes.
>
> +1 (PMC / binding)
> Marcus
> Pierre-Luc
> Mike
> Chip
>
> +1 (non binding)
> Rohit
> Nux
>
> 0
> none
>
> -1
> none
>
> Thanks to everyone participating.
>
> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out, likely for Tuesday.
>
> --David
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, David Nalley  da...@gnsa.us>> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created yet another 4.5.0 release candidate, with the following
> artifacts up for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/heads/4.5-RC20150302T1625
> Commit: c066f0455fa126a2b41cccefa25b56421a445d99
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.0-rc4/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
> Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa

RE: ACS 4.5 Release [URGENT]

[Geoff Higginbottom]

@PMC

Whilst the Vote has officially passed, we have not announced it yet so still 
have time to retract the release, fix and then potentially re-vote etc.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>

From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 10 March 2015 10:28
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: ACS 4.5 Release [URGENT]
Importance: High

Hi All,

Given that the release 4.5 vote passed, with the blocker 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8248 which had the knock on 
effect of
CLOUDSTACK-8305<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8305>


VPC ACL Rules are not applied to Virtual 
Router<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8305>

Do we have a mechanism to recall/annul that RC vote and use a build with the 
fixes in?  I have a horrible feeling that it would require another round of 
voting, but that has to be better than shipping a broken product.



Regards

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect

[cid:image001.png@01D01549.640501B0]

D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +44 7711 418 784 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/> | 
Twitter:@shapeblue<https://twitter.com/>
ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build/>
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi David,

You appear to have left x.x.x.x in the e-mail, I think you meant to put
4.5.1 here instead.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
 | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS





On 19/03/2015 15:40, "David Nalley"  wrote:

>Hi All,
>
>I've created a X.X.X release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
>Git Branch and Commit SH:
>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs
>/heads/4.5-RC20150319T1429
>Commit: 3c06466e208769f32c03767abc6bd2680fd8
>
>Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>location):
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1-rc1/
>
>PGP release keys (signed using 0x6fe50f1c):
>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
>Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
>[ ] +1  approve
>[ ] +0  no opinion
>[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1

The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete Load 
Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer config 
using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.

It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying to use 
vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails

I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not a 
common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may also 
affect Advanced Zones.


A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally 
-1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to 
remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the API.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.

Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
do RC2 if possible?

> On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>
> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
> before I do so.
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 7:35 PM, ilya  wrote:
>> Rohit,
>>
>> While we have fixes and I hate to do this to David, but i think this
>> warrants RC2 release.
>>
>> David, how likely are you to spin up another vote for RC2?
>>
>> Thanks
>> ilya
>>
>>
>> On 3/20/15 10:31 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> Don’t get discouraged by the minor regressions found as they are fixed.
>>> Note: they would only affect VMWare/Xen and the rpm bug will affect
>>> only
>>> CentOS6 users.
>>>
>>> In case you’re building from source, apply these two patches on top
>>> of RC1 and please continue testing:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/53ca0b1861c743caf61ec04f
>>> 776c87eac334f185
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/d70937aeb92e89efa8fcc39d
>>> 7f89bdd8c885b2a2
>>>
>>>> On 20-Mar-2015, at 7:51 pm, Paul Angus  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1
>>>> Regression caused by
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8312
>>>> Causes:
>>>> Unable to start instance due to can't find mapping in
>>>> ObjectInDataStore table for:
>>>> org.apache.cloudstack.storage.image.store.TemplateObject
>>>>
>>>> When trying to deploy system VM templates.
>>>>
>>>> Template gets copied to primary storage but no entries appear to be
>>>> added to the db Systemvm.iso not copied to secondary storage.
>>>> SSVM and CPVM do not get created
>>>>
>>>> Rohit has created a fix for RC2 - testing on that now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Paul Angus
>>>> Cloud Architect
>>>> D: +44 20 3468 5163 |S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7711 418 784 | T:
>>>> @CloudyAngus
>>>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
>>>> Sent: 20 March 2015 14:12
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>
>>>> +1 from me as well based on upgrade from 4.4.1 and ADV+SG zone tests.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks Rohit for the packages.
>>>>
>>>> Lucian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>>
>>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Sent: Friday, 20 March, 2015 11:38:42
>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>>>>> +1 (with one centos6 rpm build fix required, read below)
>>>>>
>>>>> Advance zone testing with/without local storage, KVM:
>>>>>
>>>>> - VM

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Rohit,

Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a LoadBalancer, 
the end result is it fails

commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule
id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
responsejson
sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc=
vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74

If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails

cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 
vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95 
vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74
Async job 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed

However if I then run

(geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203 
virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95

It succeeds!

accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86
cmd = 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBalancerRuleCmd
created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+
jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b
jobprocstatus = 0
jobresult:
success = True
jobresultcode = 0
jobresulttype = object
jobstatus = 1
userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0

I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC

Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact same 
thing.  When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug reports the 
following:

TypeError: args.context is undefined
var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]);

So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to LoadBalancer Rules 
and the UI

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

Hi Geoff,

I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules in 
an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both list 
of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools:

command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
response:json
id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184

Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?

Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB 
algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when 
Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response 
instead of hard coding it.

It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it would 
fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a workaround 
to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg is undefined:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178

Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this?

On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
> -1
>
> The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete 
> Load Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer 
> config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.
>
> It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is trying
> to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails
>
> I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is not 
> a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug may 
> also affect Advanced Zones.
>
>
> A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not normally 
> -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when trying to 
> remove Load Balancers from a GSLB setup, it fails from both the UI and the 
> API.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 24 March 2015 06:36
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi Ilya - Yes, I think we’ll need a RC2 but I don’t want another RC3 so let’s 
> wait at least for today to see if anyone reports anything.
>
> Meanwhile, let’s continue testing and let’s report/fix any issues we find. I 
> think we’ve tested RC1 with KVM and Xen, it would be great if someone could 
> share their test results against VMWare and report success/failures before we 
> do RC2 if possible?
>
>> On 24-Mar-2015, at 7:21 am, David Nalley  wrote:
>>
>> Very likely - just waiting to see if anyone uncovers anything else
>> before I do so.
&g

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Good work Rohit

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 26 March 2015 12:56
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1

Hi all,

The bug Geoff found has been fixed now along with the issue of editing an 
existing LB rule (which is sort of a workaround for now).

> On 26-Mar-2015, at 2:36 pm, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Rohit,
>
> Here is the output from Firebug when I try to remove a VM from a
> LoadBalancer, the end result is it fails
>
> commandremoveFromLoadBalancerRule
> id286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> responsejson
> sessionkeyqJOddbBPY1W4z3l9/A1zHu/nHfc=
> vmidipmap[0].vmidf9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> vmidipmap[0].vmip192.168.201.74
>
> If I try the same command using CloudMonkey it also fails
>
> cm remove fromloadbalancerrule id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> vmidipmap[0].vmid=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
> vmidipmap[0].vmip=192.168.201.74 Async job
> 6196badf-a26c-45fc-a08b-e337f693e62a failed
>
> However if I then run
>
> (geoff) cm remove fromloadbalancerrule
> id=286b1f4e-fe78-4d55-bea3-4627665e2203
> virtualmachineids=f9c0ae7f-3b14-4ee1-980b-107125243d95
>
> It succeeds!
>
> accountid = f65a1ff1-ba3e-44ab-9727-17b9227c4c86
> cmd =
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.loadbalancer.RemoveFromLoadBala
> ncerRuleCmd
> created = 2015-03-26T08:55:04+
> jobid = d74c4909-7721-4592-9e99-1751e7e0631b
> jobprocstatus = 0
> jobresult:
> success = True
> jobresultcode = 0
> jobresulttype = object
> jobstatus = 1
> userid = 4d6a37ee-6ab1-4300-8e3a-823fec050bb0
>
> I'm running the latest 4.5.1 RC
>
> Regarding the Edit LoadBalancer issue you reported, I am seeing the exact 
> same thing.  When I click the Edit button, nothing happens and Firebug 
> reports the following:
>
> TypeError: args.context is undefined
> var data = getLBAlgorithms(args.context.networks[0]);
>
> So there appears to be at least two issues here relating to
> LoadBalancer Rules and the UI
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 26 March 2015 07:25
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.5.1-rc1
>
> Hi Geoff,
>
> I tried with latest 4.5 branch and was able to add/remove VMs from LB rules 
> in an advance zone with KVM. I did not find any issues. The API can take both 
> list of VM ids and the vmidipmap. This is the trace from Chrome devtools:
>
> command:removeFromLoadBalancerRule
> response:json
> id:61da47f1-05d1-436e-8c6e-093bdf00d7f6
> vmidipmap[0].vmid:ca2b87a1-c291-4683-a765-691c6af1916e
> vmidipmap[0].vmip:10.1.1.184
>
> Geoff - can you share more details, so as to reproduce and fix it?
>
> Though one issue which broke for me was that I was unable to edit the LB 
> algorithm for an existing rule. I looked at the issue, and it was that when 
> Edit was pressed it would get lb algorithms from the list network response 
> instead of hard coding it.
>
> It came from https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7915
> The issue was in case the object given to the js handler was undefined it 
> would fail for me. It failed both on Chrome and Firefox, so I've added a 
> workaround to fallback on hardcoded list of LB algorithms if the passed arg 
> is undefined:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;
> h=221e429;hp=ca1e5c16906ebcccba8fd382239659d9083c4178
>
> Can any of the UI gurus can suggest a better fix for this?
>
> On Thursday 26 March 2015 12:17 AM, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
>> -1
>>
>> The main reason for a -1 is in relation to a UI bug when trying to delete 
>> Load Balancing Rules.  When a user tries to remove a VM from a Load Balancer 
>> config using the UI it fails, however using the API it works.
>>
>> It looks like the UI is not sending the virtualmachineid but is
>> trying to use vmidipmap[0].vmid and vmipipmap[0].vmip which fails
>>
>> I'm testing this in a EIP/ELB Basic Zone with a NetScaler which I know is 
>> not a common configuration, but I suspect this standard Load Balancer UI bug 
>> may also affect Advanced Zones.
>>
>>
>> A second issue I have found is in relation to GSLB which I would not 
>> normally -1 for as I don’t believe it’s a widely used feature, however when 
>> trying to 

Re: [VOTE]Apache CloudStack 4.4.3 release candidate 4.4-RC20150324T1321

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Tested an upgrade of a running system from 4.3.2 - advanced zone using
XenServer

Also tested taking a base install of 4.3.2 which had not been used and
upgrading to 4.4.3 and then deploying a new Zone, Isolated Networks, VPCs,
setting up ACLs etc.

Simple set of tests due to limited time, but no problems found.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
 | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS





On 25/03/2015 07:59, "Daan Hoogland"  wrote:

>Rohit (et. al.),
>
>If we vote this in this way I will of course release but baking a new
>rc is not the effort. My wish would be to feel ashamed of not
>monitoring the jenkins jobs as a community and bake a new rc.
>
>btw: thanks Star Gao for finding the centos 6.3 build problem.
>
>On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Rohit Yadav 
>wrote:
>> +1 (binding) but with build patches (see 4.4 latest branches).
>>
>> To save time, please use the following repos. If 4.4.3 passes, we can
>> ship it with the 3 build patches to save time/effort.
>>
>> CentOS repo:
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/centos/4.4/
>>
>> Debian repo:
>> http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/debian/4.4/
>>
>> Deployed basic zone, systemvms came up. Register template worked.
>> Basic vm lifecycles worked - start, stop, reboot, delete, expunge.
>> VR operations. SG rules.
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 24 March 2015 06:01 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All, (please note that the last release candidate did not get
>>> enough attention to make quorum)
>>>
>>> I've created a 4.4.3 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>>vote:
>>>
>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>
>>>
>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=re
>>>fs/heads/4.4-RC20150324T1321
>>> Commit: 483490534a8a091c7af7c61d1eaf5c0192f646d9
>>>
>>> List of changes:
>>>
>>>
>>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=re
>>>fs/tags/4.4.3
>>>
>>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>>> location):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.3
>>>
>>> PGP release keys (signed using AA4736F3):
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>>>
>>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>>>
>>> [ ] +1  approve
>>> [ ] +0  no opinion
>>> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Rohit Yadav
>> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
>> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
>>services
>>
>> IaaS Cloud Design &
>> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
>> CSForge ­ rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
>> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
>> CloudStack Software
>> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
>> CloudStack Infrastructure
>> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
>> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
>> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
>>or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not
>>the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the
>>sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is
>>a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP
>>is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape
>>Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consulto

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #4)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

-1 from me for the following reasons:

1. Can no longer clear the Username and Password settings from the config using 
the set commands - I initially connect with these, then auto configure the API 
& Secret Key, then delete the old username and password settings using:

#cloudmonkey set username
#cloudmonkey set password

But it throws an error about not allowing blank values and does not clear the 
values from the config file (it works in earlier versions)

2.  Launching now takes a lot longer, suspect an authentication issue

3. A number of my scripts which have worked for all previous versions now no 
longer work, in particular anything with spaces in seems to fail:

e.g.  This line used to work, but now it fails
offeringid1=`$cli list serviceofferings name='"Small Instance"' | grep ^id\ = | 
awk '{print $3}'`
If I rename the offering using the UI to Small_Instance (to remove the space) 
then it works

e.g. This line used to work
$cli create serviceoffering cpunumber=1 cpuspeed=500 displaytext='"Ultra Tiny - 
1vCPU, 128MB RAM"' memory=128 name='"Ultra Tiny"' offerha=true
Now it generates a Compute Offering with a name of "Ultra\ Tiny" and a 
description of "Ultra\ Tiny\ -\ 1vCPU,\ 128MB\ RAM" - note the \ before every 
space

4.  query asyncjobresult is timing out when running in a script

Some of these errors may be caused by errors in my scripts, but I have been 
using these very scripts for testing for some time now and they have always 
worked OK with earlier versions of CloudMonkey

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: 03 November 2014 11:55
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #4)

Meh, facepalm! Yes, config is from 5.2.
"set paramcompletion true" solved it.

Basic tests passed, +1 from me! :-)

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 3 November, 2014 11:40:40
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round
> #4)

> Hey,
>
> Looks like autocompletion is working (tab tab), make sure you set
> paramcompletion to true. Were you using 5.2.0 or older config file?
>
>> On 03-Nov-2014, at 5:06 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>
>> Rohit,
>>
>> I do have that module and I have install the -devel packages as well
>> before reinstalling cloudmonkey, still nothing.
>> http://img.nux.ro/s7L-Selection_046.png
>>
>> Any more pointers?
>>
>> Lucian
>>
>> --
>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>
>> Nux!
>> www.nux.ro
>>
>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Sent: Monday, 3 November, 2014 11:07:27
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0
>>> (round #4)
>>
>>> Hi Lucian,
>>>
>>> I tested CloudMonkey on Fedora and it works for me. Can you check and 
>>> install:
>>> python-setuptools, python-pip, readline and readline-devel or
>>> readline-develop (please check names before you try it) on it and retry?
>>>
>>> It is possible that the CentOS machine you’re on has no readline installed.
>>> After checking that, just open python and import readline;
>>>
>>> $ python
>>>> import readline
>>>
>>> If this fails, it’s not cloudmonkey but a dependency that is not
>>> available on your machine. If you get issues, please report the errors.
>>>
>>>> On 03-Nov-2014, at 4:18 pm, Nux!  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Rohit,
>>>>
>>>> I've deleted ~/.cloudmonkey/cache and ran sync again, but still no
>>>> go, no autocompletion. This is my CentOS 7 workstation, yesterday
>>>> on my laptop it was working fine (also CentOS 7).
>>>> Perhaps I'm missing some python module? Any one in particular I
>>>> should watch out for?
>>>>
>>>> Lucian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>>>>
>>>> Nux!
>>>> www.nux.ro
>>>>
>>>> - Original Message -
>>>>> From: "Rohit Yadav" 
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>&

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #4)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Rohit,

I've sent you the scripts 'off list' so you can test them for yourself, but 
also added comments in-line

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 03 November 2014 15:23
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #4)

Hi Geoff,

Thanks a lot of testing it. Reply in-line;


> On 03-Nov-2014, at 8:25 pm, Geoff Higginbottom 
>  wrote:
>
> -1 from me for the following reasons:
>
> 1. Can no longer clear the Username and Password settings from the config 
> using the set commands - I initially connect with these, then auto configure 
> the API & Secret Key, then delete the old username and password settings 
> using:
>
> #cloudmonkey set username
> #cloudmonkey set password
>
> But it throws an error about not allowing blank values and does not
> clear the values from the config file (it works in earlier versions)

I can fix this, I added this because earlier people could have create a profile 
with blank name (empty string) which caused weird things.

> 2.  Launching now takes a lot longer, suspect an authentication issue

I’ll have to check this, by launching do you mean when cloudmonkey starts (from 
terminal) or when an API is called within interpreter mode?

GH: When launching from a terminal it takes a log longer to get to the 
cloumonkey prompt, and scripts also take a lot longer to run


> 3. A number of my scripts which have worked for all previous versions now no 
> longer work, in particular anything with spaces in seems to fail:
>
> e.g.  This line used to work, but now it fails offeringid1=`$cli list
> serviceofferings name='"Small Instance"' | grep ^id\ = | awk '{print
> $3}'` If I rename the offering using the UI to Small_Instance (to
> remove the space) then it works
>
> e.g. This line used to work
> $cli create serviceoffering cpunumber=1 cpuspeed=500
> displaytext='"Ultra Tiny - 1vCPU, 128MB RAM"' memory=128 name='"Ultra
> Tiny"' offerha=true Now it generates a Compute Offering with a name of
> "Ultra\ Tiny" and a description of "Ultra\ Tiny\ -\ 1vCPU,\ 128MB\
> RAM" - note the \ before every space

There was a shell lexical parsing issue I fixed and then the unicode support I 
added, it could be a side-effect I’ll check it out.

> 4.  query asyncjobresult is timing out when running in a script

Can you check the current profile’s timeout? The default is 3600 (seconds, or 
1hour).

GH: The timeout is set for each script, and is typically 10 secs which has 
never been a problem before, it's probably related to slow authentication issue


Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-s

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #6)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

All previous issues have been fixed - Well done Rohit

Tested the following using scripts:

Install CloudMonkey and setup Profile
Deploy new complete Advanced Zone
Update Global Settings
Create Domains and Users
Delete default Service Offerings and Add new ones
Deploy new Network and VMs, setup Ingress and Egress Rules
Deploy new VPC and VMs, setup ACLs and Egress rules

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 04 November 2014 13:10
To: dev
Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.0 (round #6)

Hi All,

I've created a 5.3.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up 
for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/5.3
Commit: 24faf56d5ab41cef1e9f7fc294f7cf1ab5e3a742

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=5.3

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-5.3.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Testing procedure:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudMonkey+Release+test+procedure

This release aims to provide better parameter and filter completion, error 
handling and utf8/unicode support in CloudMonkey and therefore needs testing 
efforts in these areas. UTF-8 encoded string parameters usage needs to be 
tested in API calls, shell and piped calls, for example:

$ create user account=admin username=रोहित lastname=यादव firstname=रोहित 
email=bhais...@apache.org password="正體字/繁體字日本人français한국فارسیpassword123”
$ list users | grep रोहित

The vote will be open till Thursday EOD (72 hours). Please test this release 
and give your votes. Thanks.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab



Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in

Re: [VOTE][ACS44] release candidate 4.4.2 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20141111T2244

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Daan,

The link to the list of changes does not appear to work

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com<mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> | 
www.shapeblue.com | 
Twitter:@cloudstackguru<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 
4HS


On 11 Nov 2014, at 21:55, Daan Hoogland 
mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi All,

I've created a 4.4.2 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.4
Commit: b063205a3efcc194e0a4b7addb4504e6eb180c0b

List of changes:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGES;hb=4.4

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.4.2

PGP release keys (signed using 4096R/AA4736F3):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)



--
Daan
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE][ACS44] release candidate 4.4.2 RC 1 in branch 4.4-RC20141111T2244

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Daan,

I think we should have a clear list of what issues have been changed in this 
release so testers like myself can ensure we test the fixes where possible.  Of 
course we also need to do regression testing, but not having a concise list of 
what has changed does not help the testing process.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 12 November 2014 09:22
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE][ACS44] release candidate 4.4.2 RC 1 in branch 
4.4-RC2014T2244

h Geoff

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Geoff Higginbottom 
 wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> The link to the list of changes does not appear to work

I didn't give that list any attention yet. The prior version I put in a link to 
a jira list. you can make one like taht as well, though I doubt it will contain 
anything as there was nothing specifically fixed for this version. Only some 
cherry-pick and backports from other branches that people wanted in as we had 
to make a new release anyway.
All of those can be found in

http://markmail.org/message/ia2b6zhjl4qdhl5m

>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 (round #2)

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Tested numerous scripts, taking a clean install, deploying a new zone, adding 
Pods, Clusters, Hosts, updating settings, adding service offerings, creating 
Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, VM, VPCs and also a bunch of command single 
command line tests etc

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 09 January 2015 13:31
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.3.1 (round #2)

+1

- Verified signature on a different computer
- Tested bunch of bash/deployment scripts
- Tested manual cases against 4.3.2/KVM and ACS 4.5 branch

On Friday 09 January 2015 04:23 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've created a 5.3.1 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up 
> for a vote:
>
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a
> =shortlog;h=refs/heads/master
> Commit: 7498aa58a2b5772e03e25f44a37907f915889ad8
>
> List of changes:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-cloudmonkey.git;a
> =blob_plain;f=CHANGES.md;hb=master
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-X.X/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using ID 0EE3D884):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1  approve
> [ ] +0  no opinion
> [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design &
> Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software
> Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure
> Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training
> Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>

--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did 
not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I have not had chance to test yet as in the middle of a big Government Cloud 
Project, but agree with Marcus around voting.

A "-1" should only be cast (in my personal opinion) if we see a serious 
regression or there is a major bug in a new feature.

If the regression has the potential to 'break' existing deployments then it’s a 
-1.

If the new feature has a major bug then we should either fix the new feature, 
or pull it from the release.

Again only my personal opinions, but just wanted to chuck them out there.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 05 May 2015 16:23
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Oh, I didn't see a vote from you yet. I just wanted to get my opinion out.
There are some pretty critical fixes shipping in this build (clustered mgmt 
server is broken in 4.5.0, for example), and I think we need to be more 
generous with shipping fixes in small doses rather than blocking on known or 
existing issues.

On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> sure, hence the -0
>
> Op di 5 mei 2015 om 17:03 schreef Marcus :
>
> > This is the sort of thing that I'd personally not -1, unless we can
> > prove that it's a regression. If the files were released in 4.5.0
> > and haven't been modified, I'd prefer to ship some bugfixes rather
> > than trying to fix all known bugs before shipping.
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Daan Hoogland
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Rene, but it is a problem in the release. It sound very strange
> > > that it would not have been caught in any of the 4.4 releases or
> > > in 4.5.0. I am hesitant but a -1 is on the surface of my keyboard.
> > >
> > > Op di 5 mei 2015 om 13:03 schreef Rene Moser :
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Tested an update from 4.2.1 to 4.5.1 which failed because of 2
> > identical
> > > > ALTER TABLE statements for cloud_usage in schema-421to430.sql
> > > > and schema-430to440.sql
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db
> /db/schema-421to430.sql#L787
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/4.5-RC20150504T1217/setup/db
> /db/schema-430to440.sql#L464
> > > >
> > > > Commenting it out in schema-430to440.sql fixed it the update.
> > > > Not
> > really
> > > > sure if this would brake anything in other conditions.
> > > >
> > > > It is not really a problem of 4.5.1, so not vote against it.
> > > >
> > > > Yours
> > > > René
> > > >
> > > > On 04.05.2015 13:20, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > >
> > > > > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up
> > > > > for a
> > > vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Git Branch and Commit SH:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=
> refs/heads/4.5
> > > > > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
> > > > >
> > > > > List of changes:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;
> f=CHANGES.md;hb=4.5
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T12
> > > > > 17
> > > > >
> > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the
> > > > > same
> > > > > location):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
> > > > >
> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> > > > >
> > > > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be
> > > > > sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > For convenience of

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)

I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer
build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs
upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.

We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1, but
it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence the -0
for now

Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups
build, in for a busy week!

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom
CTO / Cloud Architect

D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
 | M: +447968161581 

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
 | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
<https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>

ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS





On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:

>+1 (binding)
>On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>
>> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>vote:
>> >
>> > Git Branch and Commit SH:
>> >
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=ref
>>s/heads/4.5
>> > Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>> >
>> > List of changes:
>> >
>>
>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=C
>>HANGES.md;hb=4.5
>> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.5-RC20150504T1217
>> >
>> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> > location):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.5.1/
>> >
>> > PGP release keys (signed using 0EE3D884):
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>> >
>> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>> >
>> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
>> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>> >
>> > [ ] +1  approve
>> > [ ] +0  no opinion
>> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>> >
>> > For convenience of testing, you may use the following repositories and
>> > location to download systemvm templates:
>> >
>> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/testing/
>> > http://packages.shapeblue.com/systemvmtemplate/4.5/
>> >
>> > Regards.
>>

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Vadim,

My first question is why would you want to?

The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and use ACLs 
to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.

However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by taking a 
VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC to each VM on the 
other tier.

It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and both getting 
DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.

However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for each VM, 
with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.

Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my opinion it 
'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the VMs on each Tier.

If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs then 
consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or shared network.  
I have tested this in the past, and have just tested again on 4.4.2 and this 
works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs to allow the VMs to 
communicate over the required protocols etc.

Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see this as a 
regression as I would consider it an unsupported configuration in the first 
place.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know that 
it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to 
troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but don't know 
where to start.

Vadim.

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1


On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,


Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and help test 
This is very important .

> but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at 
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs from 
> different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem desctiption at 
> user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
>

Did you report bugs ?

> Regards,
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
>
> I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv XenServer build. 
>  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and VRs upgraded 
> OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
>
> We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a -1,
> but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc hence
> the -0 for now
>
> Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security Groups 
> build, in for a busy week!
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
> CTO / Cloud Architect
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
>  | M: +447968161581 
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com
>  | Twitter:@cloudstackguru
> <https://twitter.com/#!/cloudstackguru>
>
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
> 
>
>
>
>
> On 06/05/2015 05:57, "Marcus"  wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>> On May 5, 2015 10:26 AM, "David Nalley"  wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for running with this Rohit.
>>>
>>> +1 (binding)
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 7:20 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I've created a 4.5.1 release, with the following artifacts up for a
>>> vote:
>>>>
>>>> Git Branch and Commit SH:
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;
>>> h=
>>> ref
>>> s/heads/4.5
>>>> Commit: 0eb4eb23701f0c6fec8bd5461cd9aa9f92c9576d
>>>>
>>>> List of changes:
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plai
>>> n;
>>> f=C
>>> HANGES.md;hb

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Hi Daan,

Private gateway is not for this purpose, but let's not confuse this thread, we 
can discuss it in more detail over a beer at the next User Group (far more fun)

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:04
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

Geoff, Vadim, I think the concept of a vpc private gateway is for this purpose. 
Of course more then one road leads to Rome (sorry for the Dutchism)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 11:01 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> My first question is why would you want to?
>
> The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and
> use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
>
> However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by
> taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC
> to each VM on the other tier.
>
> It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and
> both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.
>
> However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for
> each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.
>
> Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my
> opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the
> VMs on each Tier.
>
> If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs
> then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or
> shared network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested
> again on
> 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs
> to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.
>
> Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see
> this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported
> configuration in the first place.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
> that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
> troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but
> don't know where to start.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
>
>
> Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
> The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and
> help test This is very important .
>
> > but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have
> > 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs
> from different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem
> desctiption at user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> >
>
> Did you report bugs ?
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
> >
> > I¹m a -0 for now (testing still  on going)
> >
> > I have upgraded a 4.3.1 Adv XenServer build, and a 4.4.2 Adv
> > XenServer
> build.  In both cases the upgrade was successful, all System VMs and
> VRs upgraded OK, however I was not able to create any new VRs or System VMs.
> >
> > We are still analysing the logs and this may well turn out to be a
> > -1, but it could simply be an issue with the system vm template etc
> > hence the -0 for now
> >
> > Still need to test a local storage build, and a Basic with Security
> Groups build, in for a busy week!
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Geoff Higginbottom
> > CTO / Cloud Architect
> >
> > D: +44 20 3603 0542  | S: +44 20 3603 0540
> >  | M: +447968161581 
> &

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier servers
> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
> outside world.
>
The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> without need to send all the requests to VPC router.


But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully 
accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web 
servers, and not just the database.

The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the 
scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you 
create two tiers and put a firewall between them.

--

Erik
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements with a 
'+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the problem of mixing the 
threads

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-----
From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

+1

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
To: dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk  wrote:

> Geoff,
>
> Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier servers
> have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
> outside world.
>
The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> without need to send all the requests to VPC router.


But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now fully 
accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to) through the web 
servers, and not just the database.

The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and fix the 
scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud world as well, you 
create two tiers and put a firewall between them.

--

Erik
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
CloudStack Software 
Engineering<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if possible please 
test upgrade scenarios including deploying new Isolated networks and new VPCs 
as I have performed three upgrades and all pass the initial upgrade, but then 
fail to add new VRs or new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a test env i 
will +1(binding)

Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:

> Sorry for confusing the voting thread, I was backing Eriks statements
> with a '+1' but was not voting for the release - highlights the
> problem of mixing the threads
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:59
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 10:44
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 11:18 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk <
> vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee
> > wrote:
>
> > Geoff,
> >
> > Thank you for explaination. Basically the idea behind that was to
> > have (for instance) database tier and web-app tier.   Web-apps-tier
> servers
> > have to communicate with databases, but databases are closed for
> > outside world.
> >
> The easiest way is to have 2 NICs at web-tier VMs and route inside VM
> > without need to send all the requests to VPC router.
>
>
> But you're also breaking the tiering. Your database server is now
> fully accessible from the internet (or wherever you're connected to)
> through the web servers, and not just the database.
>
> The proper way, imho, is to have a firewall between (ie. the VR), and
> fix the scaling issues instead. That's what you do in the non-cloud
> world as well, you create two tiers and put a firewall between them.
>
> --
>
> Erik
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA
> Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
> under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related
> services
>
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
> http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment
> framework<http://shapeblue.com/csforge/>
> CloudStack Consulting<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-consultancy/>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-software-engineering/>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> htt

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Good news, we have found the cause of the problem I was experiencing with 
upgrade testing.  It appears that when you register the new system vm template 
in 4.3 or 4.4 using the UI, it sets the HVM flag to true.  As I was testing on 
a system using Nested Virtualisation which does not support HVM it caused it to 
fail post upgrade.  Clean installs of 4.5 do not set the HVM flag so they were 
working OK.

Rohit has identified the code to confirm this, and as this is just a quirk of 
my test environment I don’t see it as an issue (more from Rohit to follow 
shortly)

So in regards to testing upgrades from 4.2 and 4.3 things are looking good, 
just want to finish some more tests on Basic Zones with Security Groups before 
I cast my final vote.

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Marcus [mailto:shadow...@gmail.com]
Sent: 06 May 2015 16:09
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

There are reasons to want to have nics on two VPC networks. One big one is 
simply to migrate a VM from one network to the other. Another is for 
performance, if there's a situation where you have a db tier and a backup tier, 
for example, you may want some backup traffic to route through the vpc and some 
to not route, so you add a second nic to the systems you don't want to route. 
Ultimately it comes down to "we can so why not allow the flexibility?".

On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < 
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Hi Vadim,
>
> My first question is why would you want to?
>
> The concept of a VPC is to isolate the VMs on the different Tiers and
> use ACLs to pass only the traffic which needs to pass between the Tiers.
>
> However, I have just tested this on 4.4.2 (never tried it before) by
> taking a VPC with two tiers with one VM on each, and then adding a NIC
> to each VM on the other tier.
>
> It appears to work with the VMs both having NICs on each Tier, and
> both getting DHCP info correctly, even after a reboot of VMs and VR.
>
> However the default route is not set correctly and is transposed for
> each VM, with the default gateway being allocated on eth1 and not eth0.
>
> Now all that said, whilst CloudStack allows you to do this, in my
> opinion it 'breaks' the VPC model as you are no longer isolating the
> VMs on each Tier.
>
> If you really must interconnect the VMs on a VPC bypassing the ACLs
> then consider adding a 2nd NIC to each VM linked to an isolated or
> shared network.  I have tested this in the past, and have just tested
> again on
> 4.4.2 and this works as expected, but why not just configure the ACLs
> to allow the VMs to communicate over the required protocols etc.
>
> Whilst it looks the behaviour may have changed in 4.5.1, I do not see
> this as a regression as I would consider it an unsupported
> configuration in the first place.
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Vadim Kimlaychuk [mailto:vadim.kimlayc...@elion.ee]
> Sent: 06 May 2015 09:09
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
> I didn't report a bug yet.  I don't know if it works at 4.5.0, but I know
> that it worked at 4.0 -- last stable relase I was able to test.   I wish to
> troubleshoot VR to get more information about why its happening, but
> don't know where to start.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:49 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>
>
> On May 6, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Vadim Kimlaychuk
> 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am sorry for not being authorized to vote for release,
>
>
> Everyone can VOTE on a release, you don't need to be a committer.
> The entire community can vote and chime in on the VOTE threads and
> help test This is very important .
>
> > but it seems VPC is not working at 4.5.1.  I have
> > 4.5-RC20150407T1726 at
> production and using VPC is very limited. I am not able to use 2 NICs
> from different tiers  at the same VM.  Look for detatiled problem
> desctiption at user list under subject "VPC usage scenario"
> >
>
> Did you report bugs ?
>
> > Regards,
> >
> > Vadim.
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Geoff Higginbottom [mailto:geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2015 10:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > S

RE: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1 with the following testing

Upgrade of 4.3.1 and 4.4 2 systems, both Adv Zones running XenServer 6.2 
Hypervisors
Manual Tests via UI included
  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
  Restart Network with Clean Up as User to upgrade VR
  Restart VPC as User to upgrade VPC VR
  VM Lifecycle events (create, stop, start, destroy etc)
  Create, Update, Destroy VPC ACLs
  Deleting Domains, Accounts, Users, VMs, Networks, Volumes etc and confirming 
storage clean-up

API Scripted tests included
  Creating Domains, Accounts, Users, Networks, Egress Rules, Firewall and NAT 
Rules, VMs, VPCs, VPC ACLs


Upgrade of a previous 4.5.1 RC build, Basic Zone with EIP/ELB, GSLB and 
AutoScaling, with mix of XenServer 6.2 and 6.5 Hypervisors.  Dual Zone, with 
multiple PODs and Clusters.
Manual Tests included
  Upgrade System VM as Root Admin
  Upgrade VRs as Root Admin
  Updating Security Groups
  Adding / Removing Static NAT
  Adding / Removing Load Balancing
  Adding / Removing Global Server Load Balancing
  Adding / Removing AutoScaling


Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 07 May 2015 08:56
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1

+1 with following testing:

Manual Testing:

Zone with a cluster of Xenserver 6.5
  VM lifecycle, Recovering a destroyed VM, Reinstall VM
  VM Migration
  Affinity groups - anti affinity
  VM consoles
  VM and volume snapshots
  Template from volume snapshot, Download Template, Vm from template created 
form snapshot, Volume creation from volume snapshot
  Attach volume - throws an exception, preferably should give a proper error on 
UI:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8448
  Resize volum, Download volume
  Snapshot policies
  Change password
  2 Tier VPC creation, Change password for VPC VMs, Reachability of VMs in the 
same tier, VPC ACL

Automated testing: Ran some 20 regression suites, found one issue: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8437

None of the issues are a blocker.

-abhi


> On 06-May-2015, at 10:15 pm, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I tested upgrading XS 6.2 from 4.4.2 to 4.5.1 to try to reproduce and test 
> the issue Geoff reported.
>
> The issue Geoff found had to do with systemvmtemplate's requireshvm flag. 
> When we register template for the next ACS version we want to upgrade, if 
> done from UI would add requireshvm=true that sets the hvm flag to 1 (in the 
> vm_instance table, as vms start). If the host is not HVM capable, which in 
> case of Geoff was VirtualBox, systemvm will fail to start/deploy (due to no 
> host found that is HVM).
>
> When we pre-seed systemvmtemplate on secondary storage the HVM tag is set to 
> 0 (false), so it breaks the convention to set it to 1 when 
> registering/upgrading systemvm template. The fix for this is to register the 
> next sytemvm template (systemvm-xenserver-4.5) using something like 
> cloudmonkey will hvm set to false for ACS 4.4.x or below. This UI issue has 
> been fixed in ACS 4.5 so users can deselect the HVM option.
>
> I’ve asked Geoff to test and post his voting on a fresh environment, possibly 
> using VMWare fusion (if doing on laptop) as VBox does not support vmx/amd-v.
>
> Hope this helps and hoping 4.5.1 will be solid.
>
>> On 06-May-2015, at 2:38 pm, Wilder Rodrigues  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the heads-up, Geoff.
>>
>> I will start testing an upgrade scenario now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Wilder
>>
>>> On 06 May 2015, at 14:28, Geoff Higginbottom 
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> For all those of you have voted +1 based on a clean install, if
>>> possible please test upgrade scenarios including deploying new
>>> Isolated networks and new VPCs as I have performed three upgrades
>>> and all pass the initial upgrade, but then fail to add new VRs or
>>> new SSVM/CPVMs post upgrade etc
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Geoff Higginbottom
>>>
>>> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>>>
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: 06 May 2015 13:25
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.5.1
>>>
>>> based on Wilder's testing and my own bringing up a 4.5.1 server in a
>>> test env i will +1(binding)
>>>
>>> Op wo 6 mei 2015 om 14:23 schreef Geoff Higginbottom <
>>> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:
>>>
>>>> Sorry for confu

RE: ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Giles Sirett

[Geoff Higginbottom]

Congratulations Giles, nice recognition for all your hard work promoting 
CloudStack

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: 02 December 2013 17:22
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Giles Sirett
Subject: RE: ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Giles Sirett

Congratulations Giles.



Regards,

Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus 
mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com]
Sent: 02 December 2013 16:06
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Giles Sirett
Subject: ANNOUNCE] New Committer: Giles Sirett

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Giles 
Sirett to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have 
accepted.

Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For 
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to 
have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether 
contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a 
contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and 
the Apache Way.

Please join me in congratulating Giles!

-
John Burwell,
on behalf of the Apache CloudStack PMC
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs

[Geoff Higginbottom]

+1 from me, anything to make updating Docs easier has to be a positive

Regards

Geoff Higginbottom

D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581

geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com

-Original Message-
From: sebgoa [mailto:run...@gmail.com]
Sent: 09 December 2013 11:54
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath; msweet@gmail.com; Mike Tutkowski
Subject: [DISCUSS][PROPOSAL] Move docs to .rst format and readthedocs

Hi,

There has been lots of discussion about docs over the last 3/4 months, in 
summary the issues are:

-Difficult to maintain and keep website up to date (issues with lang and issues 
with pdf formatting lately) -Difficult to contribute to easily, docbook is fine 
but tedious to work on.
-Errors in the docs don't get properly fixed -Mix of OS information -Lack of 
content for certain features -Docs release cycle. Docs have bugs that will 
never get fixed in that specific release (because we see it as code release)

To remedy some of those issues and work on a new release process specific to 
docs we moved the docs to its own repo:

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-docs.git

*I propose that we move away from docbook and use a more readable format: 
restructuredtext*

I have worked on a prototype that uses restructured text:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html

This format makes it extremely easy to write docs. Existing docbook content 
could be converted to .rst using a tool like pandoc:
http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/

*In addition to changing the format I propose that we use readthedocs.org*

This will help with the release and build of the docs. readthedocs grabs the 
docs from a git repo, builds html, pdf and epub.
It can also maintain several releases. We can apply a specific -theme- to our 
docs.

See a prototype here:

http://cloudstack.readthedocs.org/en/latest/

*I propose that we move to this as early as 4.3 documentation*

Assuming this proposal passes, we would need to:

-re-architect the repo
-create the proper cnames to be in accordance with trademark guidelines -we can 
decide what content to keep or not and convert what we keep.
-decide how we organize the content
-start accepting pull requests (noting that pages can be edited directly from 
github) -make a first release of this new doc site at the same time than 4.3 
release.


Thoughts, flames ?


-Sebastien
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.