Sheng, Our e-mails will have crossed mid Atlantic - I just sent out an e-mail saying how it is now there and appears to be functioning in the sixth RC and will fully test tomorrow.
Regards Geoff Higginbottom D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com -----Original Message----- From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] Sent: 19 February 2014 19:26 To: <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) Hi Geoff, In fact I just tested the latest 4.3 branch before replied to you yesterday, and there is no issue on mine. And it's already pass QA testing. It's really weird. Could you double confirm your version or your setup? The build I got is from: commit adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc Author: Kelven Yang <kelv...@gmail.com> Date: Thu Feb 13 14:34:06 2014 -0800 CLOUDSTACK-6065: Fix NPE problem caused by the lack of context setup in threads from agent manager thread pool (cherry picked from commit 1283919f02e2c4d2652ca18693b6cf2906b2263d) Signed-off-by: Animesh Chaturvedi <anim...@apache.org> --Sheng On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks Sheng, > > Unfortunately there is no "Enable VPN" option on the VPC Source NAT IP > like there is on a normal Network Source NAT IP. > > Here is a link to the screen shot of the UI > https://www.flickr.com/photos/115889886@N08/12631278043/ > > The "vpc_id" fields which according to the spec are supposed to have > been added to the DB remote_access_vpn table are also missing. > > Attempting to create the VPN via the API also fails, implying its more > than a UI issue, the code appears not to be included the RC. > > If this is supposed to be in the 4.3.0 release, as a new sixth round > RC has just been spun I will test again, if still missing guess I'll > vote -0 as it's not a blocker, just missing when it should be there. > > Regards > > Geoff Higginbottom > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sh...@yasker.org] > Sent: 18 February 2014 22:24 > To: <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > > Hi Geoff, > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+V > PN+for+VPC > > I just checked the latest 4.3 code and VPN for VPC works well. > > The steps are(as refered in the spec): > > 1. User click VPC's IP list > 2. User choose VPC's source nat IP > 3. User click "Enable VPN" > 4. Others are the same as remote access VPN of isolated network > > --Sheng > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Geoff Higginbottom < > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > All, > > > > I was trying to test the new Remote Access VPN to VPC feature which > > is apparently included in 4.3.0 but I cannot get it to work from the > > UI (no > > buttons) or from the API. > > > > Are there some new API commands I should be using, as I believe I > > have the latest 4.3.0 API calls, and there are no specific VPC > > Remote VPN APIs listed. > > > > Regards > > > > Geoff Higginbottom > > > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 > > > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > > Sent: 18 February 2014 12:26 > > To: dev > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > > > > -1 (binding) > > > > tested vlan based standalone network tested vlan based bridged > > network tested vpc with vlan based gateway and - tier network tested > > vpc with nicira based gateway and - tier network > > > > All tests included creation of an instance and pinging the router > > from the instance. > > > > All tests passed in the end but a note on the side is that all vlan > > based tests didn't pass the ping test first time around. interface > > were created with no ip and after manually assigning ips, the > > routers still couldn't be pinged, > > > > For no obvious reason they passed after destroying the network and > > recreating it. This worries me but will lead to a +0 as such. I can > > not yet point to a bug that causes this. > > > > My -1 is due to another issue: a fix submitted to the 4.3-forward > > branch wasn't cherry-picked to this rc. See my earlier mail [1]. I > > had assumed it would be included due to [2]. > > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/sujzvfefxsohurt5 > > [2] http://markmail.org/message/n2q46ovlkvgyunyk > > > > kind regards, > > Daan Hoogland > > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Srikanteswararao Talluri < > > srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Geoff, I did not have a setup to verify again, I just > > > brought one > > up and that failure was a false alarm. Dedicate vlan range test > > passed in the next run. > > > > > > So, it is a +1 from my side > > > > > > Sent from HTC > > > > > > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > > > From: "Geoff Higginbottom" <geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com> > > > To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" <dev@cloudstack.apache.org> > > > Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > > > Date: Tue, Feb 18, 2014 5:11 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > I've update the Jira ticket with the following comment: > > > > > > I have tried to reproduce this manually and have not been able to > > re-create the issue. Added a new Guest VLAN Range in addition to > > the existing range, then dedicated to a normal user account, all > > successful, and all on the latest RC (fifth round). > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Geoff Higginbottom > > > > > > D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581 > > > > > > geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Srikanteswararao Talluri > > > [mailto:srikanteswararao.tall...@citrix.com] > > > Sent: 17 February 2014 22:29 > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (fifth round) > > > > > > There is a new test failure in this RC which is a regression from > > > previous RC. Created a bug for this > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6131 > > > > > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/cloudstack-qa-4.3/job/test-smo > > > ke > > > -m > > > atrix > > > -4.3/1194/suite=test_guest_vlan_range/testReport/integration.smoke > > > .t > > > es > > > t_gue > > > st_vlan_range/TestDedicateGuestVlanRange/test_dedicateGuestVlanRan > > > ge > > > / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1193 > > > -------- > > > 4 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM > > > are > > not supported on KVM Hypervisor and 5 more intermittent test > > script/env issue related to ssh. > > > 1 failure related to dedicated guest VLAN range looks like a bug > > > ------- > > > Link to reports: > > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1193/test > > > Re > > > po > > > rt/ > > > > > > -------- > > > Total:98 > > > Fail :10 > > > Skip :2 > > > -------- > > > > > > name pass fail skip > > > test_loadbalance/ 0 4 0 > > > test_guest_vlan_range/ 0 1 0 > > > test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 0 > > > test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 0 > > > test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 0 > > > test_resource_detail/ 1 0 0 > > > test_scale_vm/ 0 1 0 > > > test_ssvm/ 10 0 0 > > > test_network/ 7 0 0 > > > test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 0 > > > test_volumes/ 9 0 0 > > > test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 0 > > > test_routers/ 9 0 0 > > > test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0 > > > test_network_acl/ 1 0 0 > > > test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 0 > > > test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 0 > > > test_internal_lb/ 1 0 0 > > > test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 0 > > > test_global_settings/ 1 0 0 > > > test_nic/ 1 0 0 > > > test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 0 > > > test_iso/ 5 0 1 > > > test_service_offerings/ 4 0 0 > > > test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 0 > > > test_regions/ 1 0 0 > > > test_templates/ 7 0 1 > > > test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 0 > > > test_vm_snapshots/ 0 3 0 > > > test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 0 > > > test_pvlan/ 1 0 0 > > > -------- > > > > > > > > > On XenServer6.2/Test Run: #1194 > > > -------- > > > 5 failures are intermittent test script/env issues related to ssh > > > and > > > 1 failure in dedicated guest vlan range looks like a bug > > > ------- > > > Link to reports: > > > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1194/test > > > Re > > > po > > > rt/ > > > > > > -------- > > > Total:98 > > > Fail :6 > > > Skip :2 > > > -------- > > > > > > name pass fail skip > > > test_loadbalance/ 3 0 0 > > > test_guest_vlan_range/ 0 1 0 > > > test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/ 3 0 0 > > > test_non_contigiousvlan/ 1 0 0 > > > test_reset_vm_on_reboot/ 1 0 0 > > > test_resource_detail/ 1 0 0 > > > test_scale_vm/ 1 0 0 > > > test_ssvm/ 10 0 0 > > > test_network/ 7 0 0 > > > test_disk_offerings/ 3 0 0 > > > test_volumes/ 9 0 0 > > > test_affinity_groups/ 1 0 0 > > > test_routers/ 9 0 0 > > > test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2 0 0 > > > test_network_acl/ 1 0 0 > > > test_vm_life_cycle/ 9 1 0 > > > test_privategw_acl/ 1 0 0 > > > test_internal_lb/ 1 0 0 > > > test_deploy_vm/ 1 0 0 > > > test_global_settings/ 1 0 0 > > > test_nic/ 1 0 0 > > > test_public_ip_range/ 1 0 0 > > > test_iso/ 5 0 1 > > > test_service_offerings/ 4 0 0 > > > test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1 0 0 > > > test_regions/ 1 0 0 > > > test_templates/ 7 0 1 > > > test_vpc_vpn/ 2 0 0 > > > test_vm_snapshots/ 0 4 0 > > > test_portable_publicip/ 2 0 0 > > > test_pvlan/ 1 0 0 > > > -------- > > > > > > Thanks, > > > ~Talluri > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 17/02/14 10:57 am, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > > > <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >>+1 (binding) verified release artifacts, tested with devcloud. > > >> > > >>Thanks > > >>Animesh > > >> > > >>On Feb 13, 2014, at 10:25 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" > > >><animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Hi All, > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up > > >>> for a > > >>> > > >>> vote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Given that we have had multiple RC rounds with community testing > > >>>a few times, I would like to close out this VOTE little sooner by > > >>>Tuesday morning PST. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Git Branch and Commit SH: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortl > > >>>og > > >>>;h > > >>>= > > >>>ref > > >>>s/heads/4.3 > > >>> Commit: adf4dd59270917b1607940d7064748bd438cbbcc > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> List of changes: > > >>> > > >>> New Features in 4.3: > > >>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248 > > >>> > > >>> Improvement in 4.3: > > >>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249 > > >>> > > >>> Issues fixed in 4.3 > > >>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161 > > >>> > > >>> Known Issues in 4.3: > > >>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the > > >>> same > > >>> > > >>> location): > > >>> > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/ > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C): > > >>> > > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Testing instructions are here: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Release+te > > >>>st > > >>>+p > > >>>r > > >>>oce > > >>>dure > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours (Tuesday morning PST) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure > > >>>to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> [ ] +1 approve > > >>> > > >>> [ ] +0 no opinion > > >>> > > >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > >>> > > >>> > > > > > > Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack? > > > Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support< > > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the > > best > > 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments. > > > > > > Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses > > > > > > **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 > > > training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > > 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. > > > Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > > 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, > > > On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > > 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, > > > On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > > 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, > > > On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > > 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, > > > On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/> > > > > > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and > > do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related > > companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you > > must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or > > show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have > > received > this email in error. > > Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. > > ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and > > is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil > > Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated > > under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark. > > > > > > > > -- > > Daan > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and > > do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related > > companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you > > must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or > > show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have > > received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company > > incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a > > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from > > Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company > > incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue > > Ltd. ShapeBlue is a > registered trademark. > > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do > not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related > companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you > must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show > it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have > received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated > in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company > incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue > Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in > Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a > registered trademark. > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
