from:"Damoder Reddy"

Edit access to Jira

2013-10-06 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

Can you please provide me the edit access to Jira. Following are my user
details:

Username: damoder.reddy
Mail id: damoder.re...@citrix.com

Please do the needful.

Thanks
Damodar

Edit access to Jira

2013-10-06 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

Can you please provide me the edit access to Jira. Following are my user
details:

Username: damoder.reddy
Mail id: damoder.re...@citrix.com

Please do the needful.

Thanks
Damodar

RE: Wiki access

2013-10-29 Thread Damoder Reddy

Please grant me edit access.. 
Email : damoder.re...@citrix.com
Username: Damoder.reddy

-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 29 October 2013 7:18 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Wiki access

Please grant me edit access.
Email - nitin.me...@citrix.com

On 28/10/13 5:17 AM, "Gaurav Aradhye"  wrote:

>Hi,
>
>My username is gauravaradhye.
>Can anyone grant me edit permission?
>
>I need to update test plan automation columns.
>
>
>Regards,
>Gaurav
>
>
>On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Kishan Kavala
>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Hugo.
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo 
>> > Trippaers
>> > Sent: Friday, 18 October 2013 4:39 PM
>> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: Wiki access
>> >
>> > Hey Kishan,
>> >
>> > I've granted you permissions. There apparently is another Kishan 
>> > with
>> edit
>> > permission as well, so i got confused.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Hugo
>> >
>> > On 18 okt. 2013, at 12:38, Kishan Kavala 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hugo,
>> > > I've checked again. My account doesn't have edit permission.
>> > >
>> > >> -Original Message-
>> > >> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo
>>Trippaers
>> > >> Sent: Wednesday, 16 October 2013 7:59 PM
>> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: Re: Wiki access
>> > >>
>> > >> Kishan,
>> > >>
>> > >> look like you have the permissions already on account kishan. 
>> > >> Can
>>you
>> check?
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >>
>> > >> Hugo
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Oct 16, 2013, at 3:45 PM, Kishan Kavala
>>
>> > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Please grant me edit access.
>> > >>> Email: kis...@cloud.com
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ~kishan
>> > >>>
>> >  -Original Message-
>> >  From: Radhika Puthiyetath 
>> >  [mailto:radhika.puthiyet...@citrix.com]
>> >  Sent: Wednesday, 16 October 2013 3:22 PM
>> >  To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >  Subject: RE: Wiki access
>> > 
>> >  Hi,
>> > 
>> >  I do not have the edit permissions. My username is radhikap.
>> > 
>> >  Kindly provide me with the necessary permissions.
>> > 
>> >  Thanks
>> >  -Radhika
>> > 
>> >  -Original Message-
>> >  From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
>> >  Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 3:26 PM
>> >  To: dev
>> >  Subject: Re: Wiki access
>> > 
>> >  anshulg is in
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Anshul Gangwar
>> >  wrote:
>> > 
>> > > need edit permissions , username: anshulg
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Anshul
>> > >
>> > > On Friday 04 October 2013 02:47 PM, Saksham Srivastava wrote:
>> > >> Please provide me edit permissions, username: saksham
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards,
>> > >> Saksham
>> > >>
>> > >> -Original Message-
>> > >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
>> > >> Sent: Friday, October 04, 2013 10:46 AM
>> > >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: Re: Wiki access
>> > >>
>> > >> Mike, Tuna, Srinivas, Go, done.
>> > >>
>> > >> On 10/3/13 9:12 PM, "Mike Tutkowski"
>> > >> 
>> > > wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> I seem to need edit access, as well.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I'm usually logged in by default, but I believe my username 
>> > >>> is mike-tutkowski (else please try mtutkowski).
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thanks!
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Go Chiba 
>> > >>> 
>> > wrote:
>> > >>>
>> >  Hi Chip,
>> > 
>> >  Please grant me to edit pages. My id is "gochiba".
>> > 
>> > 
>> >  On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Chip Childers 
>> >  > > > wrote:
>> > > Not all committers were easy to find, but those that I 
>> > > did should be
>> >  all
>> > > set.
>> > >
>> > > So committers / contributors = provide your confluence 
>> > > ID's
>>if
>> > > you
>> >  can't
>> > > add / edit pages.  PMC folks - help add them please.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Chip Childers
>> >  > > >> wrote:
>> > >> There were major issues with Spam on the wiki, so infra 
>> > >> changed the permissions.
>> > >>
>> > >> I've just gone and added all PMC members to the space as 
>> > >> space
>> >  admins.
>> > >> That means all PMC members can help deal with this issue
>>(or
>> > >> at
>> >  least
>> > >> those that I could find in the wiki user list).
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm going to deal with committers next.  That permission 
>> > >> level
>> >  needs to
>> > >> exclude space admin.  I'm using alena1108 a

How to stop back end Agents

2013-11-05 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

Is there a way to stop selective agents which are running in 
the back end in the management server?

Thanks & Regards
Damoder/

RE: DB timeouts on failover

2014-01-26 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi Francois,

In current Cloud Stack versions there is no way to tell management servers that 
wait/reconnect for some time without fencing the management server if it sees a 
Db Connection failure.

Also the default connection-timeout parameters for a mysql database is lying 
with mysql configuration file my.cnf in which we can use the following property 
to set the default connection timeout.

"connect-timeout=seconds"

The default value is 10 seconds for this property.

PS : We are coming with a proper Database HA in 4.3, where we are using Mysql 
Connector's parameters to achieve this.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Francois Gaudreault [mailto:fgaudrea...@cloudops.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2014 9:10 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: DB timeouts on failover

Anyone? :S

On 1/23/2014, 10:33 AM, Francois Gaudreault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There was a thread on the users mailing list around the DB connection 
> timeouts when the underlaying MySQL active/passive cluster changes 
> master. The solution so far is to use a crontab to monitor if the 
> server is crashed.
>
> I'm not too familiar with the tomcat or cloudstack configs, but is 
> there any jdbc settings or timeouts we can tweak?
>

--
Francois Gaudreault
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect 
fgaudrea...@cloudops.com
514-629-6775
- - -
CloudOps
420 rue Guy
Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
www.cloudops.com
@CloudOps_

[PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

2014-02-14 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

The current ACS management server runs only on linux based operating systems.
Though it runs on windows under Cygwin terminal with some effort, I'd like to 
introduce this feature to make sure that the management server runs on windows 
without any dependencies on Cygwin etc.

The Jira Ticket : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6105
FS : 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Windowsfication

Feedback/comments are welcome.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

2014-02-14 Thread Damoder Reddy

Thanks Rajesh for the inputs...



My comments inline in RED.



Thanks & Regards

Damodar/



-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 5:26 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS



Below are my findings and suggestions.



Dependencies for mgmt server to run on windows.



1.ssh-keygen tool ( default available on linux. Its required to 
generate id_rsa_cloud keys)

2.mount cmd ( this is used by vmware/hyperv to mount sec storage on 
mgmt server to copy the systemvm.iso to copy to Hosts)

3.injectkeys.sh ( this is binary file executes on mgmt server to 
inject the dynamically generated sshkeys to systemvm.iso. its bash file)

4.there is some code part in mgmt. server where "sudo" cmd is uses 
to execute the bash files. We have to rewrite those parts to handle it for 
windows.

5.Mkisofs this is used to generate the systemvm.iso



My thought for the dependencies

1.we can generate ssh-keygen binary from c source or use the putty 
keygen utility to generate the keys.
[Damoder] I also looked into it and found only putty utility as useful one for 
now assuming that keys will be available already. Probably will think on it 
once POC is done.

2.Mount ( we have to rewrite the code in mgmt. server to handle how 
to copy in nfs or cifs  remote path by referencing them locally)
[Damoder] We are thinking to use Samba integration here

3.For injectkeys.sh We have to write a new to bat file /python 
which will do the similar job.
[Damoder] We have written a python script for this. This is in testing mode 
right now.

4.There is already windows binary mkisofs is available we can use 
it.
[Damoder] Windows binary of mkisofs is working fine.



Thanks

Rajesh Battala



-Original Message-

From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com]

Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 2:27 PM

To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>

Subject: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS



Hi,



The current ACS management server runs only on linux based operating systems.

Though it runs on windows under Cygwin terminal with some effort, I'd like to 
introduce this feature to make sure that the management server runs on windows 
without any dependencies on Cygwin etc.



The Jira Ticket : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6105

FS : 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Windowsfication



Feedback/comments are welcome.



Thanks & Regards

Damodar/

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

2014-02-19 Thread Damoder Reddy

Thank you all for your inputs.

 I will aggregate all these things into FS  as appendix and will put comments 
there instead of replying here one by one. Once I am done with update in FS I 
will notify so that we can verify whether we are covering all or not.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: abhisek basu [mailto:abhisekb...@msn.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Getting a Windows version will expand ACS reach to a large no of audience and 
make it more OS independent from its core. As far as the tools are concern, I 
am sure it's achievable, we have the most enthusiastic community contributors 
behind :)

Sent from my iPhone

> On 16 Feb 2014, at 1:08 am, "Alex Hitchins"  
> wrote:
> 
> I would guess that Windows has tools for managing a large number of Hyper-V 
> hosts? I wonder what ACS would add to that.
> 
> I still think it would be a very achievable goal and worth doing.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alex Hitchins
> 
> D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
> 
> alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:49
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> 
> My view is that anyone who wants to use Hyper-V is very unlikely to want to 
> have Linux based management servers lurking around, because I think they'll 
> be pretty wedded to Microsoft to want Hyper-V as the hypervisor. So being 
> able to deploy windows based management servers seems essential to the use of 
> Hyper-V (for better or worse).
> 
> I think also there are probably a lot of Windows based Enterprises who also 
> wouldn't like to a couple of stray Linux boxes running the show.  I guess 
> Microsoft think there is a market for Windows based private clouds or they 
> wouldn't have created the Behemoth that is the Azure Pack.
> 
> ...and Apache Tomcat have managed to create a windows port - so how hard can 
> it be? [tic]
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:29
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Alex Huang  wrote:
>> I see this as that CS management server should run anywhere java runs.  
>> However, I see quite a few holes in this proposal.
>> 
>> - Management server should never have mounted the NFS secondary storage.  We 
>> need to fix that.  Please have a talk with Kelven about this.  I don't see 
>> us adding Samba to any machine that runs the management server.  If this is 
>> just about seeding the system template, it can be done as part of 
>> installation rather than management server.
>> - If I truly think about Windowsification, I think windows installer, 
>> windows service, opening ports in windows firewall.  I don't see any of that 
>> here.  Or else it's useless for windows people.
>>- For java, most people write a windows service that launches the jvm 
>> and keeps track of the jvm.
>> - There's a number of things that CloudStack management server does today at 
>> startup that should not be there and those are what complicates the 
>> windowfication.   These things should be moved out of the management server 
>> and into installation.  What should be inside the management server startup 
>> procedure should be checks, rather than generations.  It should check for 
>> ssh key exists and the database version matches etc but it should not do the 
>> following.
>>- Upgrade of the database
>>- ssh key generation
>>- iso generation.
>> 
>> --Alex
> 
> 
> A couple of more to add to the list.
> There isn't really a good binary software dependency resolution framework for 
> Windows (at least not that I am aware of) and you potentially need lots of 
> different things - mysql libraries, python, ipmitool, or another shell to 
> execute shell scripts. Look at the list of the dependencies we install in the 
> RPMs for an idea of things that are missing. Is the plan to bundle those in 
> the binaries? (If so, we need to be having a serious discussion around a 
> shift of a number system requirements to dependencies which may or may not be
> acceptable.) With what appears to be some serious refactoring in how the 
> management server works that Alex outlines and I doubt this is a short term 
> goal. (e.g. 4.4 timeframe). If you are going to take on all of the 
> refactoring work, please start by building tests that prove that it all works 
> today and then verify the same behavior in the refactored work.
> 
> --David
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

2014-02-20 Thread Damoder Reddy

I have tried to put all together in FS at 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Windowsfication
 as Feedback section and added my comments there.

Please verify once and let me know if anything is to be added there.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:32 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Thank you all for your inputs.

 I will aggregate all these things into FS  as appendix and will put comments 
there instead of replying here one by one. Once I am done with update in FS I 
will notify so that we can verify whether we are covering all or not.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: abhisek basu [mailto:abhisekb...@msn.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Getting a Windows version will expand ACS reach to a large no of audience and 
make it more OS independent from its core. As far as the tools are concern, I 
am sure it's achievable, we have the most enthusiastic community contributors 
behind :)

Sent from my iPhone

> On 16 Feb 2014, at 1:08 am, "Alex Hitchins"  
> wrote:
> 
> I would guess that Windows has tools for managing a large number of Hyper-V 
> hosts? I wonder what ACS would add to that.
> 
> I still think it would be a very achievable goal and worth doing.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alex Hitchins
> 
> D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
> 
> alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:49
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> 
> My view is that anyone who wants to use Hyper-V is very unlikely to want to 
> have Linux based management servers lurking around, because I think they'll 
> be pretty wedded to Microsoft to want Hyper-V as the hypervisor. So being 
> able to deploy windows based management servers seems essential to the use of 
> Hyper-V (for better or worse).
> 
> I think also there are probably a lot of Windows based Enterprises who also 
> wouldn't like to a couple of stray Linux boxes running the show.  I guess 
> Microsoft think there is a market for Windows based private clouds or they 
> wouldn't have created the Behemoth that is the Azure Pack.
> 
> ...and Apache Tomcat have managed to create a windows port - so how hard can 
> it be? [tic]
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:29
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Alex Huang  wrote:
>> I see this as that CS management server should run anywhere java runs.  
>> However, I see quite a few holes in this proposal.
>> 
>> - Management server should never have mounted the NFS secondary storage.  We 
>> need to fix that.  Please have a talk with Kelven about this.  I don't see 
>> us adding Samba to any machine that runs the management server.  If this is 
>> just about seeding the system template, it can be done as part of 
>> installation rather than management server.
>> - If I truly think about Windowsification, I think windows installer, 
>> windows service, opening ports in windows firewall.  I don't see any of that 
>> here.  Or else it's useless for windows people.
>>- For java, most people write a windows service that launches the jvm 
>> and keeps track of the jvm.
>> - There's a number of things that CloudStack management server does today at 
>> startup that should not be there and those are what complicates the 
>> windowfication.   These things should be moved out of the management server 
>> and into installation.  What should be inside the management server startup 
>> procedure should be checks, rather than generations.  It should check for 
>> ssh key exists and the database version matches etc but it should not do the 
>> following.
>>- Upgrade of the database
>>- ssh key generation
>>- iso generation.
>> 
>> --Alex
> 
> 
> A couple of more to add to the list.
> There isn't really a good binary software dependency resolution framework for 
> Windows (at least not that I am aware of) and you potentially need lots of 
> different things - mysq

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

2014-02-20 Thread Damoder Reddy

One question I have is, Which version of windows we need to target?

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:04 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

I have tried to put all together in FS at 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Windowsfication
 as Feedback section and added my comments there.

Please verify once and let me know if anything is to be added there.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:32 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Thank you all for your inputs.

 I will aggregate all these things into FS  as appendix and will put comments 
there instead of replying here one by one. Once I am done with update in FS I 
will notify so that we can verify whether we are covering all or not.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: abhisek basu [mailto:abhisekb...@msn.com] 
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:16 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

Getting a Windows version will expand ACS reach to a large no of audience and 
make it more OS independent from its core. As far as the tools are concern, I 
am sure it's achievable, we have the most enthusiastic community contributors 
behind :)

Sent from my iPhone

> On 16 Feb 2014, at 1:08 am, "Alex Hitchins"  
> wrote:
> 
> I would guess that Windows has tools for managing a large number of Hyper-V 
> hosts? I wonder what ACS would add to that.
> 
> I still think it would be a very achievable goal and worth doing.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Alex Hitchins
> 
> D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
> 
> alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:49
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> 
> My view is that anyone who wants to use Hyper-V is very unlikely to want to 
> have Linux based management servers lurking around, because I think they'll 
> be pretty wedded to Microsoft to want Hyper-V as the hypervisor. So being 
> able to deploy windows based management servers seems essential to the use of 
> Hyper-V (for better or worse).
> 
> I think also there are probably a lot of Windows based Enterprises who also 
> wouldn't like to a couple of stray Linux boxes running the show.  I guess 
> Microsoft think there is a market for Windows based private clouds or they 
> wouldn't have created the Behemoth that is the Azure Pack.
> 
> ...and Apache Tomcat have managed to create a windows port - so how hard can 
> it be? [tic]
> 
> Regards
> 
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> Sent: 15 February 2014 18:29
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> 
>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Alex Huang  wrote:
>> I see this as that CS management server should run anywhere java runs.  
>> However, I see quite a few holes in this proposal.
>> 
>> - Management server should never have mounted the NFS secondary storage.  We 
>> need to fix that.  Please have a talk with Kelven about this.  I don't see 
>> us adding Samba to any machine that runs the management server.  If this is 
>> just about seeding the system template, it can be done as part of 
>> installation rather than management server.
>> - If I truly think about Windowsification, I think windows installer, 
>> windows service, opening ports in windows firewall.  I don't see any of that 
>> here.  Or else it's useless for windows people.
>>- For java, most people write a windows service that launches the jvm 
>> and keeps track of the jvm.
>> - There's a number of things that CloudStack management server does today at 
>> startup that should not be there and those are what complicates the 
>> windowfication.   These things should be moved out of the management server 
>> and into installation.  What should be inside the management server startup 
>> procedure should be checks, rather than generations.  It should check for 
>> ssh key exists and the database version matches etc but it should not do the 
>> following.
>>- Upgrade of the database
>>- ssh key generation
>>

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

2014-02-21 Thread Damoder Reddy


For DB HA we have included a new class StaticStrategy.java which is having 
compile time dependency on mysql -connector-java. 
I will make change in pom, as provided scope dependency instead of compile time 
so that maven will not include in the bundle while packaging.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:24 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I will try to work on this a bit this evening, but others may be faster.

--David

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi 
 wrote:
> Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking 
> care of fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:13 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Chip Childers 
>> 
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:37:46AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all 
>> >> feeling a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh. 
>> >> I apologize in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to 
>> >> RC6.
>> >>
>> >> I've been playing with 4.3.0-rc6 for a couple of days now. I 
>> >> attempted to build some RPMs and had problems with dependency 
>> >> resolution in maven. This led me to looking at a number of 
>> >> different poms, and I noticed mysql-connector-java is listed as a 
>> >> runtime dependency. For our end users, this really isn't necessary 
>> >> - the debs and rpms specify a requirement (effectively a system 
>> >> requirement in the terms of
>> >> policy) for mysql-connector-java. We don't need it to build the 
>> >> software (at least not in any location I've seen) - just when running.
>> >> (And thus its a system dependency, much like MySQL is.)
>> >>
>> >> mysql-connector-java is GPLv2; which is Cat X. By including it as 
>> >> a dependency in the pom it automatically gets downloaded. The 3rd 
>> >> Party software policy has this line in it:
>> >>
>> >> "YOU MUST NOT distribute build scripts or documentation within an 
>> >> Apache product with the purpose of causing the default/standard 
>> >> build of an Apache product to include any part of aprohibited work."
>> >>
>> >> We've released software with this dependency previously. Is this a 
>> >> blocker for 4.3 or do we fix going forward? (If we hadn't already 
>> >> shipped releases with this problem I'd lean a bit more towards it 
>> >> being a blocker - but its more murky now.)
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts, comments, flames?
>> >>
>> >> --David
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>> >
>> > During incubation, this dependency was raised as an issue.  
>> > Generally, there are 2 ways to deal with Category X dependencies 
>> > within an ASF
>> > project:
>> >
>> > 1) Make it an optional part of the software.  This is what we do 
>> > with the nonoss build target, but won't work for the mysql-connector.
>> >
>> > 2) Make it a "system dependency" that is expected to be installed 
>> > on the system prior to our software.
>> >
>> > mysql-connector-java (and the python equiv) were supposed to be 
>> > handled using option 2 (system dependency).
>> >
>> > Currently, our RPM packaging depends on the relevant RPM to pull 
>> > this in as a system dependency.  I can't tell with the DEBs, but 
>> > that would need to be reviewed.
>> >
>> > The problem is that our maven poms pull down the jar automatically 
>> > right now.  This is the blocker for us.  I'm certainly not a 
>> > lawyer, but my understanding of ASF policy is that we need to make 
>> > some changes before making another release.
>> >
>> > So, there appear to be three things that have to happen:
>> >
>> > 1) Confirm that the mysql-connector-java is a system dependency in 
>> > the DEB packaging.
>> >
>> > 2) Ensure that a "normal build" of the project using mvn does not 
>> > automatically download the mysql-connector-java jar files.
>> >
>> > 3) Retest the project to ensure that the above changes work.
>> >
>> > Then we can re-spin an RC.
>> >
>> > -chip
>>
>> For those following along at home, here are some relevant links:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

2014-02-21 Thread Damoder Reddy

I have created a defect for this at: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6152

I have put the patch in review board at : https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/

Please review the same and commit it to the branch(4.3-forward) if these 
changes are fine. Otherwise please let me know if we need to put it into any 
other scope other than provided

@Animesh : Please Cherry Pick it from 4.3.-forward once committed. 

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Friday, 21 February 2014 5:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?


For DB HA we have included a new class StaticStrategy.java which is having 
compile time dependency on mysql -connector-java. 
I will make change in pom, as provided scope dependency instead of compile time 
so that maven will not include in the bundle while packaging.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:24 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I will try to work on this a bit this evening, but others may be faster.

--David

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi 
 wrote:
> Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking 
> care of fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:13 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Chip Childers 
>> 
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:37:46AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all 
>> >> feeling a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh.
>> >> I apologize in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to 
>> >> RC6.
>> >>
>> >> I've been playing with 4.3.0-rc6 for a couple of days now. I 
>> >> attempted to build some RPMs and had problems with dependency 
>> >> resolution in maven. This led me to looking at a number of 
>> >> different poms, and I noticed mysql-connector-java is listed as a 
>> >> runtime dependency. For our end users, this really isn't necessary
>> >> - the debs and rpms specify a requirement (effectively a system 
>> >> requirement in the terms of
>> >> policy) for mysql-connector-java. We don't need it to build the 
>> >> software (at least not in any location I've seen) - just when running.
>> >> (And thus its a system dependency, much like MySQL is.)
>> >>
>> >> mysql-connector-java is GPLv2; which is Cat X. By including it as 
>> >> a dependency in the pom it automatically gets downloaded. The 3rd 
>> >> Party software policy has this line in it:
>> >>
>> >> "YOU MUST NOT distribute build scripts or documentation within an 
>> >> Apache product with the purpose of causing the default/standard 
>> >> build of an Apache product to include any part of aprohibited work."
>> >>
>> >> We've released software with this dependency previously. Is this a 
>> >> blocker for 4.3 or do we fix going forward? (If we hadn't already 
>> >> shipped releases with this problem I'd lean a bit more towards it 
>> >> being a blocker - but its more murky now.)
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts, comments, flames?
>> >>
>> >> --David
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>> >
>> > During incubation, this dependency was raised as an issue.  
>> > Generally, there are 2 ways to deal with Category X dependencies 
>> > within an ASF
>> > project:
>> >
>> > 1) Make it an optional part of the software.  This is what we do 
>> > with the nonoss build target, but won't work for the mysql-connector.
>> >
>> > 2) Make it a "system dependency" that is expected to be installed 
>> > on the system prior to our software.
>> >
>> > mysql-connector-java (and the python equiv) were supposed to be 
>> > handled using option 2 (system dependency).
>> >
>> > Currently, our RPM packaging depends on the relevant RPM to pull 
>> > this in as a system dependency.  I can't tell with the DEBs, but 
>> > that would

RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

2014-02-21 Thread Damoder Reddy

Initially I thought my change caused to bundle the mysql-connector-java into 
RPM in 4.3... but after did more analysis I found that mysql-connector is 
already getting bundled into RPM in 4.2.x as well.

Looks like issue is something else as well.. I am not sure this will fix the 
actual issue.

 Anyhow we need to apply this patch even after fixing the actual issue.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 6:24 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I have created a defect for this at: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6152

I have put the patch in review board at : https://reviews.apache.org/r/18353/

Please review the same and commit it to the branch(4.3-forward) if these 
changes are fine. Otherwise please let me know if we need to put it into any 
other scope other than provided

@Animesh : Please Cherry Pick it from 4.3.-forward once committed. 

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Friday, 21 February 2014 5:19 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?


For DB HA we have included a new class StaticStrategy.java which is having 
compile time dependency on mysql -connector-java. 
I will make change in pom, as provided scope dependency instead of compile time 
so that maven will not include in the bundle while packaging.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 12:24 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?

I will try to work on this a bit this evening, but others may be faster.

--David

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi 
 wrote:
> Chip, David thanks for the detailed explanation, is one of you taking 
> care of fixing this issue or we need to find other volunteers
>
> Thanks
> Animesh
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 10:13 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Policy blocker?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Chip Childers 
>> 
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:37:46AM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>> >> Hi folks,
>> >>
>> >> I cringe to raise this issue. After 6 RCs I am sure we are all 
>> >> feeling a little bit of release vote fatigue. Especially Animesh.
>> >> I apologize in advance; in all other respects I am ready to give a +1 to 
>> >> RC6.
>> >>
>> >> I've been playing with 4.3.0-rc6 for a couple of days now. I 
>> >> attempted to build some RPMs and had problems with dependency 
>> >> resolution in maven. This led me to looking at a number of 
>> >> different poms, and I noticed mysql-connector-java is listed as a 
>> >> runtime dependency. For our end users, this really isn't necessary
>> >> - the debs and rpms specify a requirement (effectively a system 
>> >> requirement in the terms of
>> >> policy) for mysql-connector-java. We don't need it to build the 
>> >> software (at least not in any location I've seen) - just when running.
>> >> (And thus its a system dependency, much like MySQL is.)
>> >>
>> >> mysql-connector-java is GPLv2; which is Cat X. By including it as 
>> >> a dependency in the pom it automatically gets downloaded. The 3rd 
>> >> Party software policy has this line in it:
>> >>
>> >> "YOU MUST NOT distribute build scripts or documentation within an 
>> >> Apache product with the purpose of causing the default/standard 
>> >> build of an Apache product to include any part of aprohibited work."
>> >>
>> >> We've released software with this dependency previously. Is this a 
>> >> blocker for 4.3 or do we fix going forward? (If we hadn't already 
>> >> shipped releases with this problem I'd lean a bit more towards it 
>> >> being a blocker - but its more murky now.)
>> >>
>> >> Thoughts, comments, flames?
>> >>
>> >> --David
>> >>
>> >> [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html
>> >
>> > During incubation, this dependency was raised as an issue.  
>> > Generally, there are 2 ways to deal with Category X dependencies 
>> > within an ASF
>> > project:
>> >
>> > 1) Make it an optional part of the software.  This is

RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS

2014-02-24 Thread Damoder Reddy

gt; >> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Alex Hitchins 
> >> >  wrote:
> >> > > I can't think of anything that wouldn't be possible on W2k3 - 
> >> > > that said It's
> >> > old and I can't see people having a need for it.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards
> >> > >
> >> > > Alex Hitchins
> >> > >
> >> > > D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 2036 030 540 | M: +44 7788 423 969
> >> > >
> >> > > alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> > > From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> >> > > Sent: 20 February 2014 11:17
> >> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> > >
> >> > > Isn't the hyper-v support dependant on using 2012r2 ?
> >> > >
> >> > > So I don't know if I'd bother with going back as far as 2003
> >> > >
> >> > > Regards,
> >> > >
> >> > > Paul Angus
> >> > > Cloud Architect
> >> > > S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus 
> >> > > paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> > > From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com]
> >> > > Sent: 20 February 2014 11:13
> >> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> > >
> >> > > AFAIK, it would be windows server 2k3, 2k8 2012, 2012R2.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > Rajesh Battala
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> > > From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com]
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 4:32 PM
> >> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> > >
> >> > > One question I have is, Which version of windows we need to target?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks & Regards
> >> > > Damodar/
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> > > From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com]
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 2:04 PM
> >> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> > >
> >> > > I have tried to put all together in FS at
> >> >
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Cloudstack+Win
> >> > dowsfication as Feedback section and added my comments there.
> >> > >
> >> > > Please verify once and let me know if anything is to be added there.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks & Regards
> >> > > Damodar/
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> > > From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com]
> >> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 12:32 PM
> >> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: RE: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you all for your inputs.
> >> > >
> >> > >  I will aggregate all these things into FS  as appendix and 
> >> > > will put comments
> >> > there instead of replying here one by one. Once I am done with 
> >> > update in FS I will notify so that we can verify whether we are 
> >> > covering all
> >>or not.
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks & Regards
> >> > > Damodar/
> >> > >
> >> > > -Original Message-
> >> > > From: abhisek basu [mailto:abhisekb...@msn.com]
> >> > > Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 9:16 AM
> >> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Windowsfication Of ACS
> >> > >
> >> > > Getting a Windows version will expand ACS reach to a large no 
> >> > > of audience and make it more OS independent from its core. As 
> >> > > far as the tool

RE: developers and mysql

2014-02-26 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi Alex,

The mysql dependency is on for only " StaticStrategy.java" as mentioned 
by you. And this is not used anywhere in the code base as a compile time 
dependency rather used as a run time dependency in db.properties. this will be 
passed to mysql driver as part of mysql Database URL construction. 

This StaticStrategy.java will become mute if we move out of mysql driver as it 
has only runtime dependency.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang 
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:13 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Damoder Reddy
Subject: RE: developers and mysql

@Hugo

The mysql scripts is a legacy of we used to dump the mysql db to create the 
create-schema sql but it is at worst still a runtime dependency.  We should fix 
it but I don't think it's as high a priority as the compile time dependency 
that has been introduced.

@Damoder,

Can you take a look at StaticStrategy.java?  This is the only file that 
requires mysql but I couldn't find anywhere in the code that references this 
class.  I then looked at the bug and wiki and it also doesn't mentioned that 
dependency on mysql has been added.  It doesn't make sense for CloudStack to 
include this automatically.  There are many ways to provide DB HA and 
incorporate it into our code just limits the possibilities.  We can for example 
document this as a way to do it in on the wiki for example but I just don't see 
why we would use code to limit it.

Thanks.

--Alex

> -Original Message-
> From: Hugo Trippaers [mailto:trip...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 2:02 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: developers and mysql
> 
> We are already pretty much locked in as all our database scripts are 
> MySQL specific. If we want to be neutral we should fix that.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Hugo
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> > On 25 feb. 2014, at 22:57, David Nalley  wrote:
> >
> > git blame showed that it came from the HA/replication work from Damoder.
> > I didn't speak up at the time, but I am really reluctant for 
> > mysql-specific features to sneak in and lock us in.
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Alex Huang 
> wrote:
> >> Who added the dependency on mysql for framework-db?  We actually
> worked hard to keep that depending on jdbc only.  It should not depend 
> on mysql.  We need to fix that.
> >>
> >> --Alex
> >>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo 
> >>> Trippaers
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 3:34 AM
> >>> To: 
> >>> Subject: Re: developers and mysql
> >>>
> >>> Heya,
> >>>
> >>> Just pushed a change that will make the database work again. :-)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> @Alex. The mysql jar used to be pulled in as a dependency from
> >>> framework- db. As the client target is responsible for building 
> >>> the war file for the packages including this in the client pom 
> >>> would also put it in the war file and in the packages.
> >>>
> >>> I think i have an elegant solution, its now included as a 
> >>> dependency for both the database deploy and the jetty:run target. 
> >>> Which makes it effectively a "provided" library for the purpose of 
> >>> our maven build. See commit 
> >>> 8e6b86ae23dce802044388c5420ff61511d7115b and 
> >>> e883877c7a6f9df04b572afd4ee5f10d265bcc3a.
> >>>
> >>> I can deploy a database and start the jetty:run target now without 
> >>> any trouble (at least not more trouble than usual ;-) )
> >>>
> >>> My next step is to clean up some of the dependencies. I think that 
> >>> only cloud-framework-db should have a provided dependency on mysql.
> >>> It's the only piece of source code that actually needs the mysql 
> >>> driver to be present during compilation for the optional HA 
> >>> configuration. There are some test classes that depend on database 
> >>> functionally but those should be moved to an integration test 
> >>> profile that could include the database driver, those tests are 
> >>> disabled
> anyway so they don't cause any trouble now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Hugo
> >>>
> >>>> On 25 feb. 2014, at 06:39, Rajani Karuturi 
> >>>> 
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we move the mysql-co

RE: developers and mysql

2014-02-27 Thread Damoder Reddy

I think We need to upload this new jar somewhere so that people who need DB HA 
can download from there. This is for non-developers (For Example Testers).

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2014 2:22 PM
To: 
Subject: Re: developers and mysql

Done

commit a0f932437c9ac9a0a82cc9b45b1aa6f17e8a478a
Author: Hugo Trippaers 
Date:   Thu Feb 27 09:48:55 2014 +0100

Move mysql ha strategy to a plugin. Activate this plugin using the mysqlha 
profile or the noredist flag



On 27 feb. 2014, at 09:25, Hugo Trippaers  wrote:

> 
> On 27 feb. 2014, at 09:09, Alex Huang  wrote:
> 
>> Abhi,
>> 
>> It's not licensing issue that troubles me.  It's the fact that mysql's been 
>> made a compile dependency when it wasn't before.  It encourages people to 
>> adopt more mysql functionality into the cloudstack code.  Eventually that 
>> means we get more and more tied in with mysql once the trend has started.
> 
> Agreed, that is a risk. We need to keep paying attention that new additions 
> don't introduce something we are not comfortable with. We maybe could make a 
> jenkins check that will alert if the dependency list changes from a previous 
> compile. Should be possible with a little creative scripting.
> 
>> 
>> I would prefer the entire file is not in CloudStack as it really has nothing 
>> to do with CloudStack itself.  But, I'm fine with Hugo suggestion of this 
>> being put into pluginin enabled by noredist and mysql is only dependent upon 
>> in that plugin's pom.xml.
> 
> My reasoning here is that somebody took the time and effort to write 
> something to either improve cloudstack or fix a problem. We should try to 
> include this if we reasonably can, every contribution is valuable. That said 
> i would be curious to know if anyone is relying on this at the moment.
> 
>> 
>> --Alex
>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Abhinandan Prateek [mailto:abhinandan.prat...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:54 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Damoder Reddy
>>> Subject: Re: developers and mysql
>>> 
>>> Immediately if there are no specific licensing issues we should 
>>> maintain the status-quo.
>>> The fact is that some other HA solutions will not work as all the 
>>> schema related scripts are mysql engine specific.
>>> 
>>> When we decide to move the mysql dependency out of cloudstack we 
>>> should do it for all such dependencies.
>>> If there is an agreement here we can file a ticket to track this.
>>> 
>>> -abhi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 27/02/14 11:16 am, "Abhinandan Prateek"
>>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> StaticStrategy is overriding the Mysql¹s HA Strategy. So it is more 
>>>> a part of the mysql jdbc driver providing a specific strategy that 
>>>> works as per the documented HA procedure.
>>>> 
>>>> I think moving it to a separate github project that generates the 
>>>> additional mysql connector jar should be ok (any licensing issues).
>>>> We can then document that anyone configuring DB-HA as per the
>>> suggested
>>>> procedure should download this and add it to the classpath.
>>>> 
>>>> -abhi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 27/02/14 10:54 am, "Alex Huang"  wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Damoder,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't think I follow.  There's clearly compile dependency on 
>>>>> mysql in StaticStrategy.
>>>>> 
>>>>> To me, when I look at StaticStartegy, it makes sense to move that 
>>>>> into separate project in github and reference people to it if they 
>>>>> want to use the specific setup outlined in the DB HA wiki.  That 
>>>>> to me would make it a runtime dependency only.
>>>>> 
>>>>> --Alex
>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>>> From: Damoder Reddy
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 9:20 PM
>>>>>> To: Alex Huang; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: RE: developers and mysql
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  The mysql dependency is on for only " StaticStrategy.java" as 
>>>>>> mentioned by you. And this is not used anywhere in th

RE: 4.4 Feature Freeze

2014-03-03 Thread Damoder Reddy

This list is not containing CLOUDSTACK-6105



Looks like I did not set Fix Versions Properly for this ticket..


Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

From: Trippie [mailto:trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Hugo Trippaers
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 7:40 PM
To: 
Subject: Re: 4.4 Feature Freeze

i'm all for being flexible, but i find a lot of the arguments used here 
debatable.

"It causes developers to rush their development to meet the deadline." This 
will happen anyway, every time we've extended the deadline we got new features 
coming in at the last minute. Actually i'm under the impression that when we 
move the deadline people will actually try to get more features in instead of 
working on stabilizing existing features.

"We can't deliver features on the roadmap." There is validity to this point, 
but on the other hand we already know the entire release schedule way ahead, 
this feature freeze date should not come as a surprise. But as i mentioned in 
an earlier mail, lets have this discussion. Post which features might not make 
it into the release so we can have a discussion if we should slip the release 
date to get this feature in. I think we all now that there are commercial 
parties working with this software to build releases and have customers 
demanding features, but if we don't discuss that on list it's hard for us to 
take it into account.

"Feature freeze wasn't called" True, i wasn't even aware that this was a 
requirement. We should add this to the procedure here 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Releases so release 
managers know this is expected of them. It should not impact the dates as the 
dates are already fixed by the release schedule (every 4 months)


I'm still -1 on extending the feature freeze. I would rather extend the 
test/stability phase to we have some more time to fix issues before we get into 
the RC spinning.


This is the list of current features targeted for 4.4 according to our Jira. 
Which features would be impacted if we don't move the feature freeze?

ASF JIRA
Project: CloudStack
Type: New Feature
Fix Version: 4.4.0
Resolution: Unresolved
Sorted by: Updated descending
1-15 of 15 as at: 28/Feb/14 15:07
T  Key Summary Assignee  Reporter  P
  Status  Resolution   Created   UpdatedDue
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6181
Root resize
Unassigned Nux [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved  
27/Feb/1427/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6161
distributed routing and network ACL with OVS plug-in
Murali Reddy  Murali Reddy  [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved
  24/Feb/1424/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6092
Storage OverProvisioning as a Per Primary Basis
Saksham SrivastavaSaksham Srivastava[Major] [Open]  Open
  Unresolved  13/Feb/1420/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6144
HA for guest VMs running Hyper-V
Unassigned Rajesh Battala [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved  
20/Feb/1420/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6143
Storage Live-Migration support for Hyper-V
Unassigned Rajesh Battala [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved  
20/Feb/1420/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6142
Zone Wide Primary Store in Hyper-V
Unassigned Rajesh Battala [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved  
20/Feb/1420/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6104
PVLAN support for CloudStack deployment over Nexus 1000v in VMware environment
Sateesh Chodapuneedi   Sateesh Chodapuneedi   [Major] 
[Open]  Open  Unresolved  14/Feb/1415/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6109
Support of iSCSI as primary store in Hyper-V
Rajesh Battala Rajesh Battala [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved  
14/Feb/1414/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6106
Support of VPC in HyperV
Rajesh Battala Rajesh Battala [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved  
14/Feb/1414/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6090
Virtual Router Service Failure Alerting
Harikrishna Patnala Harikrishna Patnala [Major] [Open]  Open
  Unresolved  13/Feb/1413/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-6052
List VM enhancement to support querying with multiple VM IDs
Koushik Das   Koushik Das   [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved
  07/Feb/1407/Feb/14
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-5569
enhance OVS plug-in to support region level VPC and guest networks that span 
zones
Murali Reddy  Murali Reddy  [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved
  19/Dec/1319/Dec/13
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-5568
introduce notion of guest network that spans multiple zones
Murali Reddy  Murali Reddy  [Major] [Open]  Open  Unresolved
  19/Dec/1319/Dec/13
[New Feature]CLOUDSTACK-5567
enable

[PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server

2014-03-11 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

Created a review board request : https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/

Tested on windows server 2008 R2 and windows 8.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)

2014-03-11 Thread Damoder Reddy

Can we use project version in the plugins/database/mysql-ha/pom.xml instead of 
hard coding of the version in plugins. I have seen same issues even in other 
plugin poms as well.

Also in this pom.xml the relative path of the parent pom is wrong. It should be 
"../../pom.xml" instead of "../pom.xml". 

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:01 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Hugo Trippaers (htrippa...@schubergphilis.com); Paul Angus
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)



> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:35 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)
> 
> Trying to build 4.3,  the process bombs out for me at MySQL HA Strategy.
> And strangely it seems to be trying to build MySQL from Master (4.4.0- 
> SNAPSHOT)?
[Animesh] Ok this came in from Hugo's commit that I cherry-picked
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;h=472a387d2d828e21aff93a750ed3e178837a1879

from file plugins/database/mysql-ha/pom.xml This is a  version issue which can 
be fixed but should not affect functioning. Lets hear from Hugo on this.


The other errors are formatting issues caught by checkstyle plugin that can be 
ignored. The Jenkins build is successful.

> 
> Ideas anyone?
> 
> 
> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - MySQL HA Strategy .. FAILURE 
> [1.110s] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-
> plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) on project 
> cloud-plugin-database-
> mysqlha: Failed during checkstyle execution: There are 6 checkstyle 
> errors. -> [Help 1]
> 
> [INFO] 
> --
> -- [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Plugin - MySQL HA Strategy 4.4.0- 
> SNAPSHOT [INFO] 
> --
> --
> [INFO]
> [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ 
> cloud-plugin- database-mysqlha --- [INFO] Deleting
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-ha/target (includes = [**/*], excludes = 
> []) [INFO] Deleting 
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-ha (includes = [target, dist], excludes = 
> []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check 
> (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha --- [INFO] Starting 
> audit...
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/StaticStrategy.java:54: Line has trailing spaces.
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/StaticStrategy.java:58: Line has trailing spaces.
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/StaticStrategy.java:60: Line has trailing spaces.
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/StaticStrategy.java:110: Line has trailing spaces.
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/StaticStrategy.java:120: Line has trailing spaces.
> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/StaticStrategy.java:127: Line has trailing spaces.
> Audit done.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 11 March 2014 03:00
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)
> 
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> 
> 
> I've created a 4.3.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a
> 
> vote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Git Branch and Commit SH:
> 
> https://git-wip-
> us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.3
> Commit: ec4db7bbff60f0be96e39f51c0f17b12e0de440c
> 
> 
> 
> List of changes:
> 
> New Features in 4.3: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325248
> 
> Improvement in 4.3: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12325249
> 
> Issues fixed in 4.3 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326161
> 
> Known Issues in 4.3: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12326162
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> 
> location):
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.3.0/
> 
> 
> 
> PGP release keys (signed using 94BE0D7C):
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> 
> 
> 
> Testi

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)

2014-03-12 Thread Damoder Reddy

HI Paul,

 After you pull Hugo changes are you able to build now?

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 2:04 PM
To: Hugo Trippaers
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)

Yes that's correct. I'm building noredist


Regards,

Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: 
+447711418784
T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com


 Original message 
From: Hugo Trippaers
Date:12/03/2014 07:32 (GMT+00:00)
To: Paul Angus
Cc: Animesh Chaturvedi ,dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)

Hey Paul,

Just to be clear, this problem only occurs during the noredist build right?

Mysql HA is one of the noredist features, so it should not be present in the 
regular build.

I'm checking the poms now to see if everything is configured correctly.

Cheers,

Hugo

On 12 mrt. 2014, at 08:14, Paul Angus  wrote:

> If I manually fix the white spaces I can get past MySQL HA Strategy, but then 
> I hit:
>
> [INFO] 
> --
> -- [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Client UI 4.3.0 [INFO] 
> --
> --
> Downloading: 
> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-plugin
> -database-mysqlha/4.3.0/cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha-4.3.0.pom
> [WARNING] The POM for 
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha:jar:4.3.0 is 
> missing, no dependency information available
> Downloading: 
> http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/apache/cloudstack/cloud-plugin
> -database-mysqlha/4.3.0/cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha-4.3.0.jar
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project cloud-client-ui: Could not 
> resolve dependencies for project 
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-client-ui:war:4.3.0: Could not find 
> artifact org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha:jar:4.3.0 
> in central (http://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2) -> [Help 1]
>
> MySQL HA Strategy seems to need a bit of work.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus 
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 11 March 2014 19:31
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Hugo Trippaers; Hugo Trippaers (htrippa...@schubergphilis.com); 
> Paul Angus
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Paul Angus [mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 10:35 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (seventh round)
>>
>> Trying to build 4.3,  the process bombs out for me at MySQL HA Strategy.
>> And strangely it seems to be trying to build MySQL from Master 
>> (4.4.0- SNAPSHOT)?
> [Animesh] Ok this came in from Hugo's commit that I cherry-picked
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commitdiff;
> h=472a387d2d828e21aff93a750ed3e178837a1879
>
> from file plugins/database/mysql-ha/pom.xml This is a  version issue which 
> can be fixed but should not affect functioning. Lets hear from Hugo on this.
>
>
> The other errors are formatting issues caught by checkstyle plugin that can 
> be ignored. The Jenkins build is successful.
>
>>
>> Ideas anyone?
>>
>>
>> [INFO] Apache CloudStack Plugin - MySQL HA Strategy .. FAILURE 
>> [1.110s] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
>> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-checkstyle-
>> plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) on project
>> cloud-plugin-database-
>> mysqlha: Failed during checkstyle execution: There are 6 checkstyle 
>> errors. -> [Help 1]
>>
>> [INFO]
>> -
>> -
>> -- [INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Plugin - MySQL HA Strategy 
>> 4.4.0- SNAPSHOT [INFO]
>> -
>> -
>> --
>> [INFO]
>> [INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @
>> cloud-plugin- database-mysqlha --- [INFO] Deleting
>> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
>> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-ha/target (includes = [**/*], excludes =
>> []) [INFO] Deleting
>> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
>> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-ha (includes = [target, dist], excludes 
>> =
>> []) [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check
>> (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha --- [INFO] Starting 
>> audit...
>> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
>> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
>> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/StaticStrategy.java:54: Line has trailing spaces.
>> /usr/local/4.3/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-
>> 4.3.0/plugins/database/mysql-
>> ha/src/com/cloud/utils/db/S

RE: [4.4] mysql-ha POM error

2014-03-27 Thread Damoder Reddy

Paul,

We have seen this issue while doing maven build on Red Hat Linux 6.2 and Fedora 
.. this was due to the wrong relative path in plugins/database/mysql-ha/pom.xml 
as mentioned by you. 

This got fixed in the commit mentioned by Ilya 
(https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=commit;h=15b6860c68125ea73f113cc9b41c10a67d661088
 ). 
But I think  this is not cherry-picked to 4.4. Looks like 4.4 branch created 
before this commit.

The 4.3 branch has the fix.

Somebody who has commit writes need to cherry pick this to 4.4 branch.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 8:39 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [4.4] mysql-ha POM error

Paul,

If no response comes thru, i'd say work your way backwards and see what 
changed. Here is an example, perhaps Hugo would know, since he attempted to fix 
it 13 days ago.

https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=history;f=plugins/database/mysql-ha/pom.xml;h=be7f976c1027071a30b0d813535f224fc4f7e9dc;hb=HEAD

Regards
ilya

On 3/27/14, 7:32 AM, Paul Angus wrote:
>
> I'm trying to build 4.4 noredist, but it's failing to build with the 
> following error:
>
> [ERROR]   The project 
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloud-plugin-database-mysqlha:4.4.0-SNAPSHOT
> (/usr/local/4.4/cloudstack/dist/rpmbuild/BUILD/cloudstack-4.4.0-SNAPSH
> OT/plugins/database/mysql-ha/pom.xml)
> has 1 error
>
> [ERROR] Non-resolvable parent POM: Could not find artifact 
> org.apache.cloudstack:cloudstack-plugins:pom:4.4.0-SNAPSHOT and 
> 'parent.relativePath' points at wrong local POM @ line 15, column 11
> -> [Help 2]
>
> The pom in 4.4 has ../pom.xml
>
> The pom in master has ../../pom.xml
>
> Can someone fix it quickly or shall I create a bug?
>
> Regards,
>
> Paul Angus
>
> *Senior Consultant / Cloud Architect*
>
> cid:image003.png@01CEF0F0.9C9104D0
>
> S: +44 20 3603 0540  | M: +4
> 47711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus
>
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com  | 
> www.shapeblue.com  | Twitter:@shapeblue 
> 
>
> ShapeBlue Ltd, 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS
>
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support 
>  offers the 
> best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
>
> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>
> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training
> 
> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom 
> 
> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line 
> 
> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line 
> 
> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line 
> 
> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line 
> 
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are 
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related 
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you 
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have 
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated 
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue 
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in 
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is 
> a registered trademark.

[PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server

2014-03-27 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hugo,

  Can Windowsfication be cherry-picked to 4.4 from master ? It is now well 
reviewed and tested. Due to review process it got delayed to commit to 4.4 
earlier.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

RE: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server

2014-03-28 Thread Damoder Reddy

There are no major existing code level changes in this feature except one 
File(com.cloud.server .ConfigurationServerImpl). For this also we have written 
test cases to verify.

Remaining all are new files added which are specific to Windows.

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/


-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 5:27 PM
To: Abhinandan Prateek
Cc: ; Donal Lafferty
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][Merge] Windowsfication of management server

On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Abhinandan Prateek 
 wrote:
> This was proposed as per laid down norms


quality is the only norm, Abhi. Can we make this of high enough quality as to 
not introduce bugs in other parts of the system or to hold back the next 
release as much as we did this one? The alternative, as I so boldly stated in 
my earlier mail is introducing the notion of experimental features. This is not 
perse about this feature or the parts of it we can get in without degrading the 
rest of the system.

--
Daan

[PROPOSAL] Maven integration for windowsfication

2014-04-02 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

All of you may know we are using Wix Installer to create Windows MSI package 
for cloud stack. I am trying to integrate Wix tool with maven build process. I 
found the following 2 plugins for the same.

We are using the following commands from wix tool set.

1.   Heat - To harvest a directory

2.   Candle - to compile the xmls and create obj files

3.   Light - to create msi package

http://incubator.apache.org/npanday/docs/1.2/plugins/wix-maven-plugin/
https://bitbucket.org/joxley/wix-maven-plugin

The later one is extension of the first one.

Both the plugins support the following goals as of now

1.   Candle

2.   Light

We are missing "heat" goal in the above plugins, which is needed for our 
packaging.

I am thinking to write our own plugin to support this "heat" goal by extending 
the second plugin above.

Is it ok to write our own plugins for this?
If yes then where should we put this plugin's code in the code base. I mean 
which module this should go in(Can we put this code in cloud stack code base at 
all)?


-Damodar

RE: [ACS 4.4][QA] Windowsfication of management server

2014-04-08 Thread Damoder Reddy

g and documentation.

Documentation:
If we want to ship this with 4.4 and announce that CS now runs on windows we 
need to have the installation manual covered at least.

Packaging:
We can't expect our users to build it themselves on windows. So we need some 
kind of packaging that people can install on their windows server.

Testing:
We need to automagically verify that these changes aren't affected by future 
changes. I would expect to see the packaging and functional tests on starting 
and stopping CS on a windows host as part of the automated test procedure. I'd 
be happy to work with you to set it up on Jenkins.

If we can fix these items before the bug fix phase i'd be +1 to include this in 
the 4.4 release, but of course this is depending on the consensus in the 
community. I'm just the RM, not the guy who decides what goes into a release.

Cheers,

Hugo

On 28 mrt. 2014, at 06:14, Abhinandan Prateek  
wrote:

> It will be really nice to get the preview code for windowsfication in 4.4.
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18964/
> The changes are well segregated.
>
> -abhi
>
> On 28/03/14 10:26 am, "Damoder Reddy"  wrote:
>
>> Hugo,
>>
>> Can Windowsfication be cherry-picked to 4.4 from master ? It is now 
>> well reviewed and tested. Due to review process it got delayed to 
>> commit to 4.4 earlier.
>>
>> Thanks & Regards
>> Damodar/
>>
>

Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line<http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: [PROPOSAL] Maven integration for windowsfication

2014-04-14 Thread Damoder Reddy

Ok to start with I will include it in the project and will remove it later to 
new project on github

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 2:43 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Maven integration for windowsfication

On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Damoder Reddy  wrote:
> Is it ok to write our own plugins for this?
> If yes then where should we put this plugin's code in the code base. I mean 
> which module this should go in(Can we put this code in cloud stack code base 
> at all)?

H Damoder, I'd say create your own project on github (or fin a suitable apache 
project to donate to) and add the plugin there. Then load it in the build 
process for cloudstack. You can also start by putting it in the project but in 
the long run it will be out of place.

good luck,
--
Daan

[PROPOSAL] Add getPathSeparator() to DataStoreTO.java

2014-05-13 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

While working on windowsfication of management server, I found the issues when 
creating a template from a ROOT disk snapshot. 
It is not able to create template out of that snapshot due to the snapshot path 
we are constructing before creating template is using "File.Separator" and on 
windows it would be "\" instead of "/". Due to this the template creation is 
failing from snapshot when management server is running on windows.

Code snippet example is

String snapshotInstallPath = snapshot.getPath();
    int index = snapshotInstallPath.lastIndexOf(File.separator);
    String snapshotName = snapshotInstallPath.substring(index + 1);

    if (!snapshotName.startsWith("VHD-") && 
!snapshotName.endsWith(".vhd")) {
    snapshotInstallPath = snapshotInstallPath + ".vhd";
    }
    URI snapshotURI = new URI(secondaryStorageUrl + File.separator + 
snapshotInstallPath);
    String snapshotPath = snapshotURI.getHost() + ":" + 
snapshotURI.getPath();

To fix this problem I am proposing the following solution.

The path separator is specific to the file system(NFS, samba etc..) we are 
using as a secondary storage on SSVM. Instead of using File.separator in the 
path, we can add a method say "getPathSeparator()" to 
"DataStoreTO.java" which is implemented by several file systems. And we will 
replace "File.separator" with the above method call at all respective places.

Anybody see any problems or any other better approach can think of here?

Is this the only place we need to do changes or any other places also changes 
are required to achieve this?

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

[PROPOSAL] Add getPathSeparator() to DataStoreTO.java

2014-05-13 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi,

While working on windowsfication of management server, I found the issues when 
creating a template from a ROOT disk snapshot.
It is not able to create template out of that snapshot due to the snapshot path 
we are constructing before creating template is using "File.Separator" and on 
windows it would be "\" instead of "/". Due to this the template creation is 
failing from snapshot when management server is running on windows.

Code snippet example is

String snapshotInstallPath = snapshot.getPath();
int index = snapshotInstallPath.lastIndexOf(File.separator);
String snapshotName = snapshotInstallPath.substring(index + 1);

if (!snapshotName.startsWith("VHD-") && 
!snapshotName.endsWith(".vhd")) {
snapshotInstallPath = snapshotInstallPath + ".vhd";
}
URI snapshotURI = new URI(secondaryStorageUrl + File.separator + 
snapshotInstallPath);
String snapshotPath = snapshotURI.getHost() + ":" + 
snapshotURI.getPath();

To fix this problem I am proposing the following solution.

The path separator is specific to the file system(NFS, samba etc..) we are 
using as a secondary storage on SSVM. Instead of using File.separator in the 
path, we can add a method say "getPathSeparator()" to
"DataStoreTO.java" which is implemented by several file systems. And we will 
replace "File.separator" with the above method call at all respective places.

Anybody see any problems or any other better approach can think of here?

Is this the only place we need to do changes or any other places also changes 
are required to achieve this?

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

RE: [PROPOSAL] Add getPathSeparator() to DataStoreTO.java

2014-05-18 Thread Damoder Reddy

Any thoughts on below proposal??

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 10:54 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Min Chen; Edison Su
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Add getPathSeparator() to DataStoreTO.java

Hi,

While working on windowsfication of management server, I found the issues when 
creating a template from a ROOT disk snapshot. 
It is not able to create template out of that snapshot due to the snapshot path 
we are constructing before creating template is using "File.Separator" and on 
windows it would be "\" instead of "/". Due to this the template creation is 
failing from snapshot when management server is running on windows.

Code snippet example is

String snapshotInstallPath = snapshot.getPath();
    int index = snapshotInstallPath.lastIndexOf(File.separator);
    String snapshotName = snapshotInstallPath.substring(index + 1);

    if (!snapshotName.startsWith("VHD-") && 
!snapshotName.endsWith(".vhd")) {
    snapshotInstallPath = snapshotInstallPath + ".vhd";
    }
    URI snapshotURI = new URI(secondaryStorageUrl + File.separator + 
snapshotInstallPath);
    String snapshotPath = snapshotURI.getHost() + ":" + 
snapshotURI.getPath();

To fix this problem I am proposing the following solution.

The path separator is specific to the file system(NFS, samba etc..) we are 
using as a secondary storage on SSVM. Instead of using File.separator in the 
path, we can add a method say "getPathSeparator()" to "DataStoreTO.java" which 
is implemented by several file systems. And we will replace "File.separator" 
with the above method call at all respective places.

Anybody see any problems or any other better approach can think of here?

Is this the only place we need to do changes or any other places also changes 
are required to achieve this?

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

RE: [ANNOUNCE] Santhosh Edukulla as a committer...

2014-06-30 Thread Damoder Reddy

Congratulations Santosh..

Thanks & Regards
Damodar/

-Original Message-
From: Shweta Agarwal [mailto:shweta.agar...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 1, 2014 9:56 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] Santhosh Edukulla as a committer...

Congrats Santosh !!

-Original Message-
From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2014 9:55 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Santhosh Edukulla as a committer...

Hi All,

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Santhosh 
Edukulla to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has 
accepted.

Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For 
developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eliminates the need to 
have contributions reviewed via the patch submission process. Whether 
contributions are development-related or otherwise, it is a recognition of a 
contributor's participation in the project and commitment to the project and 
the Apache Way.

Please join me in congratulating Santhosh!

--Alex, on behalf of the CloudStack PMC

RE: Review Request 23192: Adding Readme and run checkbox at the end of the installation. Also installing mysql connector

2014-07-07 Thread Damoder Reddy

Ok,

To clarify the windows MSI will not build in the default profile. I have 
enabled a new profile "buildw" to build windows MSI installer which explicitly 
we need to pass similar to nonoss?

Is that sufficient to make it nonoss or still we need to move it under nonoss 
profile explicitly?

Thanks
Damoder/

-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us] 
Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2014 9:58 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Damoder Reddy; Koushik Das
Subject: Re: Review Request 23192: Adding Readme and run checkbox at the end of 
the installation. Also installing mysql connector

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Chip Childers  wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 03:14:30PM +, Leo Simons wrote:
>> It looks like that maven pom on windows _by default_ downloads and 
>> installs a variety of non-apache-license (and/or non-mit/bsd/variant
>> license) software. That shouldnąt really happen. The principle is one 
>> of łleast surprise˛: As a user or developer who does not RTFM, 
>> following the default commands/tools/etc, you should end up with a 
>> more-or-less apache-licensed build result (*) that you can 
>> redistribute the result under.
>
> +1
>
>>
>> But apache policy is that it is acceptable to provide scripts/build 
>> tools/assistance to help those same users/developers do things that 
>> they want to do. As long as they understand the legal situation they end up 
>> in.
>>
>> I would recommend adding a "nonoss" maven profile that the 
>> developer/user has to explicitly select in order to do those 
>> downloads. As long as that option is described clearly, thatąs then 
>> ok. See
>>
>>   http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr/trunk/README
>>
>> for an example of how to point out the license situation.
>
> We already have the nonoss profile, so this is a pretty good fix for 
> the windows build issues noted above IMO.
>
> Damoder/Koushik - please make this change.
>
>>
>> Something similar is true by the way (IMHO, but as a project 
>> cloudstack can definitely decide differently), for a possible MSI 
>> script. Making an MSI script that prompts the user whether to 
>> download mysql at the point of install, **clearly pointing out the 
>> license situation** if they choose to do so, seems reasonable, and I 
>> personally would not object to shipping _that_ kind of script as part of an 
>> apache source release.
>>
>
> +1 - that's a reasonable approach as well.  Damoder / Koushik - what 
> +do
> you think about this approach?
>

I like this approach. We have a number of things that aren't in the 'default' 
build because of policy reasons. This is just another of them.



>> Finally, the _spirit_ behind the apache policies is that there should 
>> be an option to use cloudstack with a license-compatible database 
>> (say, postgres), even if most users will use mysql (just like most 
>> people that use dbm with httpd will use berkely dbm, but you _can_ 
>> use something else). Itąs perhaps unfortunate that this isnąt 
>> supported, but thatąs not apache policy, and given the license 
>> situation of other system dependencies, I can imagine no-one here wants to 
>> make it a priority.
>
> Yeah, that would be nice...  but somebody would have to decide that 
> they want to do that.
>
>>
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>>
>> Leo
>>
>> PS: IANAL, but, a lot of this discussion is a bit beyond legal, and 
>> is about choice/policy, and the policy is supposed to be based on 
>> common sense much more than license stuff tends to be :)
>
> Agreed - this is about policy not legality.
>

RE: Review Request 23192: Adding Readme and run checkbox at the end of the installation. Also installing mysql connector

2014-07-08 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hugo,

 As Rajani mentioned we are not packaging the sources with MSI installer, we 
are telling to installer from where to download the dependencies.

Anyhow my question is, the MSI build is already part of separate build profile 
("buildw") which is not build with default profile. So still we need to move it 
to under noredist profile?

Damoder/

-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, 9 July 2014 10:45 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: David Nalley; Koushik Das
Subject: Re: Review Request 23192: Adding Readme and run checkbox at the end of 
the installation. Also installing mysql connector

Hi Hugo,
Even in case of windows installer, mysql-connector-java is mentioned in a 
[spec] file. only difference being, it also mentions the download url as 
windows doesn’t have a package repository and doesn’t know where to download 
from.
It will not be part of the installer. The msi only tells where to download the 
mysql connector jar from. It doesn’t include the jar itself.

When the user is installing cloudstack using the msi, the jar will be 
downloaded from the location mentioned.


[spec] https://reviews.apache.org/r/23192/diff/#5

~Rajani



On 08-Jul-2014, at 7:25 pm, Hugo Trippaers 
mailto:h...@trippaers.nl>> wrote:

Rajani,

That is why we renamed nonoss to noredist. It has to do with the policy of the 
Apache Software Foundation regarding compatible licenses [1]. The problem in 
this case is subtle, but there is a difference. The main point in the 
discussion is so-called system dependencies. We know we need java, mysql and 
the mysql-connector-java to be installed before we can install our packages. 
This is what the dependency on mysql-connector-java in the spec file indicates. 
Creating a package containing those source is actually including the items we 
consider is going just a bit further and to a point where we concluded that it 
is not inline with the apache policies. So it is perfectly alright to include a 
popup in the installer that tells the users that he needs to install mysql, 
java etc, but we can’t have an installed in the source that will do that for 
the user as part of the installer.

What David proposes is a the middle ground where we can keep the installer in 
the configured like this in the pom, but it can’t be in that standard build, 
but only in the build that know we can’t redistribute (the noredist build). We 
will never make the artifacts resulting from that build available, but other 
entities can make them available. By specifying noredist on the build command 
we can be reasonably sure that the builder has been informed that distribution 
restrictions might apply on whatever it is he is doing.

Cheers,

Hugo

[1] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x


On 8 jul. 2014, at 12:57, Rajani Karuturi 
mailto:rajani.karut...@citrix.com>> wrote:

I believe this has nothing to do with nonoss. If I understand it right, nonoss 
modules are required for cloudstack to work with certain 3rd party stuff.

This one is just a helper to create a windows installer. It chose to use a mvn 
command to create the installer instead of shell/bat script. It should work 
with either nonoss or oss modules.
This is very similar to cloud.spec[1] we have which is used to create the rpm 
and which already has mysql-connector-java already listed as required package.

I think the right way would be to create independent git repos for 
deb/rpm/windows installers/packages.

In its current state, I don’t see it any different from other helper installer 
scripts we already have.

[1] 
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=blob_plain;f=packaging/centos63/cloud.spec;hb=HEAD

~Rajani



On 08-Jul-2014, at 9:56 am, Damoder Reddy 
mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com><mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com>>
 wrote:

Ok,

To clarify the windows MSI will not build in the default profile. I have 
enabled a new profile "buildw" to build windows MSI installer which explicitly 
we need to pass similar to nonoss?

Is that sufficient to make it nonoss or still we need to move it under nonoss 
profile explicitly?

Thanks
Damoder/

-Original Message-
From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
Sent: Thursday, 3 July 2014 9:58 PM
To: 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: Damoder Reddy; Koushik Das
Subject: Re: Review Request 23192: Adding Readme and run checkbox at the end of 
the installation. Also installing mysql connector

On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Chip Childers 
mailto:chipchild...@apache.org><mailto:chipchild...@apache.org>>
 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 03:14:30PM +, Leo Simons wrote:
It looks like that maven pom on windows _by default_ downloads and installs a 
variety of non-apache-license (and/or non-mit/bsd/variant
license) software. That shouldnąt really happen. The principle i

[PROPOSAL] Adding a plugin to check the password strength of all users

2014-07-17 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi all,

I am thinking to add a plugin which enables to check the password strength of a 
user while setting/resetting the password for that user.
why as a plugin because different companies may have a different rule sets to 
check the password strength.

The default implementation will have the password strength calculation based on 
the following parameters
1. Length of the password
2. Number of Character Sets involved in the password defined. For ex, Upper 
Case Letter, Lower Case letter, Digits and special character set.

Ay suggestions/Comments?

Thanks
Damoder

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding a plugin to check the password strength of all users

2014-07-18 Thread Damoder Reddy

Will show the strength of the password as well.


On 18-Jul-2014, at 6:53 pm, Demetrius Tsitrelis 
 wrote:

> Will the plugin merely show the strength of the password or will the plugin 
> prevent the use of weak passwords?
> 
> ____
> From: Damoder Reddy [damoder.re...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:02 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [PROPOSAL] Adding a plugin to check the password strength of all 
> users
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I am thinking to add a plugin which enables to check the password strength of 
> a user while setting/resetting the password for that user.
> why as a plugin because different companies may have a different rule sets to 
> check the password strength.
> 
> The default implementation will have the password strength calculation based 
> on the following parameters
> 1. Length of the password
> 2. Number of Character Sets involved in the password defined. For ex, Upper 
> Case Letter, Lower Case letter, Digits and special character set.
> 
> Ay suggestions/Comments?
> 
> Thanks
> Damoder

Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding a plugin to check the password strength of all users

2014-07-21 Thread Damoder Reddy

For the first part I am planning to add parameters to global settings.

But for the 2nd part I think it depends on where we are integrating this plugin.

To start with I will integrate it with abstract layer of Authenticator 
implementations and we can override in the corresponding authenticator on need 
basis.  

Thanks
Damoder/

On 18-Jul-2014, at 10:28 pm, Demetrius Tsitrelis 
 wrote:

> So the plugin will show the strength AND it will enforce the strength when a 
> user is created or updates his password.  Will it be possible for an 
> administrator to disable either of these?
> 
> For both of those capabilities is the plugin's behavior configurable for 
> different authentication encoders?  That is, could I have one set of rules 
> for the SHA256 authenticator and a different set of rules for the MD5 
> authenticator?
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: Damoder Reddy [mailto:damoder.re...@citrix.com] 
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 9:13 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Adding a plugin to check the password strength of all 
> users
> 
> Will show the strength of the password as well.
> 
> 
> On 18-Jul-2014, at 6:53 pm, Demetrius Tsitrelis 
>  wrote:
> 
>> Will the plugin merely show the strength of the password or will the plugin 
>> prevent the use of weak passwords?
>> 
>> 
>> From: Damoder Reddy [damoder.re...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 11:02 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [PROPOSAL] Adding a plugin to check the password strength of 
>> all users
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I am thinking to add a plugin which enables to check the password strength 
>> of a user while setting/resetting the password for that user.
>> why as a plugin because different companies may have a different rule sets 
>> to check the password strength.
>> 
>> The default implementation will have the password strength calculation 
>> based on the following parameters 1. Length of the password 2. Number 
>> of Character Sets involved in the password defined. For ex, Upper Case 
>> Letter, Lower Case letter, Digits and special character set.
>> 
>> Ay suggestions/Comments?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Damoder
>

Re: [ACS44]: Git Push Summary

2014-07-22 Thread Damoder Reddy

The windows support for cloudstack is not checked-in in into 4.4 so it will be 
available in 4.5.0.

On 23-Jul-2014, at 9:40 am, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

> I think “Cloudstack on Windows” was only on master which would be 4.5
> 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6105 has fix version as 4.5
> 
> @Damoder can you comment?
> 
> 
> ~Rajani
> 
> 
> 
> On 23-Jul-2014, at 8:17 am, Pierre-Luc Dion 
> mailto:pd...@cloudops.com>> wrote:
> 
> release-notes updated and ready but not yet the default.
> 
> http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-release-notes/en/4.4.0/
> 
> 
> 
> *Pierre-Luc DION*
> Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
> t 855.652.5683
> 
> *CloudOps* Votre partenaire infonuagique* | *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 07/22/2014 04:56 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> 
> I pushed the tag 4.4.0 on the latest RC to the central repo.
> 
> @Wido: can you create the deb packages and upload them?
> 
> 
> I'm building the packages right now. I had to modify the debian/changelog
> file however to generate the 4.4.0 packages.
> 
> Code-wise it's the 4.4.0 tag.
> 
> Wido
> 
> 
> @Pierre-Luc: can you finalize the release docs?
> @Hugo: can you create the RPM/systemVM
> 
> Are we releasing the windows MSI? And who can create those?
> 
> regards,
> Daan
> 
> -- Forwarded message --
> From:  
> Date: Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 4:47 PM
> Subject: Git Push Summary
> To: comm...@cloudstack.apache.org
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack
> Updated Tags:  refs/tags/4.4.0 [created] 726b9884a
> 
> 
> 
>

[DISCUSSION] Changes to server.xml to support tomcat7

2014-08-13 Thread Damoder Reddy

Hi all,

 I was using tomcat7 in my dev setup and on the latest master I am not able to 
start the management server due to the following class(es) which we used in 
"server-*.xm.in" is/are removed from tomcat7 onwards.

1. 
 2. http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-7.0-doc/changelog.html)

I do not see any issues to comment out the 1st section.

Anybody else see any issues if we comment out the 1st section above with 
respect to "tomcat6/tomcat7"?

Thanks
Damoder/

Re: [DISCUSSION] Changes to server.xml to support tomcat7

2014-08-14 Thread Damoder Reddy


On 14-Aug-2014, at 1:57 pm, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:

>> 
>> 
>> Anybody else see any issues if we comment out the 1st section above with
>> respect to "tomcat6/tomcat7"?
>> 
>> 
> once we move to tomcat7, this file would no longer be relevant for tomcat6
> right?

Yes that is correct..

> 
> ~Rajani

Re: [DISCUSSION] Changes to server.xml to support tomcat7

2014-08-20 Thread Damoder Reddy

The fact I used tocat7 is to support RHEL7 for cloudstack and RHEL7 has support 
for tomcat7 so started using tomcat7..

On 14-Aug-2014, at 11:50 pm, Carlos Reategui  wrote:

> Isn't Jetty used for testing?  Why not use it for deployment too and get
> rid of tomcat.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:51 AM, Damoder Reddy 
> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 14-Aug-2014, at 1:57 pm, Rajani Karuturi  wrote:
>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Anybody else see any issues if we comment out the 1st section above with
>>>> respect to "tomcat6/tomcat7"?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> once we move to tomcat7, this file would no longer be relevant for
>> tomcat6
>>> right?
>> 
>> Yes that is correct..
>> 
>>> 
>>> ~Rajani
>> 
>>

Re: [2/2] git commit: updated refs/heads/master to 23c7c73

2014-09-02 Thread Damoder Reddy

Right it is a commented out file but I think spring does not like Empty Context 
Files so it is failing to start.

On 02-Sep-2014, at 1:49 pm, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi Hugo,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:09 AM,  wrote:
> 
>> Revert "server: Add event bus bean as commented xml in META-INF core"
>> 
>> Breaks CloudStack startup. You're better off putting this on the wiki
>> 
> 
> Alright will do, but this is just a file in which the bean is commented so
> it does not break CloudStack startup.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
>> 
>> This reverts commit c730bc3491f8b684c5ae51e0bff54cf7577cc246.
>> 
>> 
>> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/repo
>> Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/commit/f636611c
>> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/tree/f636611c
>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/diff/f636611c
>> 
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: f636611caca7dfe1f6b7a2da6d0da530ffb6e502
>> Parents: 3d04b52
>> Author: Hugo Trippaers 
>> Authored: Tue Sep 2 09:58:25 2014 +0200
>> Committer: Hugo Trippaers 
>> Committed: Tue Sep 2 10:09:04 2014 +0200
>> 
>> --
>> .../core/spring-event-bus-context.xml   | 38 
>> 1 file changed, 38 deletions(-)
>> --
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/cloudstack/blob/f636611c/server/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-event-bus-context.xml
>> --
>> diff --git
>> a/server/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-event-bus-context.xml
>> b/server/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-event-bus-context.xml
>> deleted file mode 100644
>> index 3e1a8ed..000
>> ---
>> a/server/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-event-bus-context.xml
>> +++ /dev/null
>> @@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
>> -
>> -
>> 
>>

40 matches

Mail list logo