date:20210104

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland merged pull request #174: cks: make it clear that deny acls/egress can fail pod deployment

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



DaanHoogland merged pull request #174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/174


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Rohit Yadav

Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to specify 
the rados monitor port (such as 10.100.250.14:6789) in the UI form when you add 
a ceph rbd pool. For example, via API the url parameter would look like: 
"rbd://cephtest:AQC3u_JfhipzGBAACiILEFKembN8gTJsIvu6nQ==@192.168.1.10:6789/cephtest"

@Daan Hoogland @Gabriel Beims 
Bräscher @Wido Hollander 
@Wei ZHOU - the issue seems to be rbd pool fails 
to be added if a port is not specified - what do you think, should we treat 
this as blocker or document it (i.e. ask admins to specify rados monitor port)?


Regards.


From: li jerry 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 13:10
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Hi Rohit

Yes, I didn't specify a port when I added primary storage;

After r failed, I checked with virsh and found that the pool had been created 
successfully, and the capacity, allocation and available of RBD could be 
displayed.
So I'm sure it's not the wrong key.


Please note that:
In the output pool dump, I see that there is no port target under host
But the code gets port and converts it to int

String port = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host", "port", source));



virsh pool-dumpxml d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5

d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
12122373201920
912457728
11998204379136


rbd






-Jerry

发件人: Rohit Yadav
发送时间: 2021年1月4日 15:32
收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Hi Jerry,

Can you see my reply? I'm able to add a RBD primary storage if I specify the 
port, should we still consider it a blocker then?


Regards.


From: li jerry 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:52
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: dev 
Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

I'm creating PR to fix this.

I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be 
unable to be added.

-邮件原件-
发件人: Daan Hoogland 
发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57
收件人: users 
抄送: dev 
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

looks good Jerry,
Are you making a PR? It seems to me that this would not be a blocker and should 
go in future releases. Please argue against me if you disagree.


rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:48 AM li jerry  wrote:

> - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
> - Did you fresh install or upgrade?
>
> No, This is a new deployment, there are no upgrades
>
> I have changed two methods. At present, RBD storage is running
>
>
> /cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStoragePoolXMLParser.java
> //String _xmlPort = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host",
> "port", source));
> int port = 0;
> String _xmlPort = getAttrValue("host", "port", source);
> if ( ! _xmlPort.isEmpty()) {
> port = Integer.parseInt(_xmlPort);
> }
>
>
>
>
> /cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtDomainXMLParser.java
> //int port = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host",
> "port", disk));
> int port = 0;
> String _xmlPort = getAttrValue("host", "port", disk);
> if ( ! _xmlPort.isEmpty()) {
> port = Integer.parseInt(_xmlPort);
> }
>
>
> -Jerry
>
> 发件人: Daan Hoogland
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:41
> 收件人: users
> 抄送: dev
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> Jerry,
> - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
> - Did you fresh install or upgrade?
> @list is there any RDB user that can advise on the missing
> configuration causing the NumberFormatException, please?
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 1:25 PM li jerry  wrote:
>
> > Happy New Year to all.
> >
> >
> > Sorry, I can't add RBD primary storage when I deploy with 4.15 RC3
> >
> > CloudStack: 4.15 RC3
> >
> > OS : Ubuntu 20.04.01
> >
> > DB: MYSQL 8.0.22
> >
> > CEPH: 15.2.8
> >
> > libvirt:6.0.0
> > hypervisor: QEMU 4.2.1
> >
> >
> > Add main memory to report the following error:
> >
> > 2021-01-03 13:15:32,605 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent]
> > (agentRequest-Handler-2:nul

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] hstan77 commented on issue #909: Missing of Add IP Range in GuestNetwork, It has in Legacy Interface

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



hstan77 commented on issue #909:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/909#issuecomment-753846187


   Yes, can still use old UI or API,
   
   In legacy UI interface, there is only add, but not edit.  However, I may
   suggest allow edit for  the start and end IP (instead of add new) , or  add
   new range for new prefix .
   
   For modification,  i also suggest to allow edit to add in IPv6 if possible
   to the range.  As growing support  and demand of IPv6 in real world now,
   many old implementation that now may start adding IPv6  to the pool..  But
   those IPv4 Prefix that previously added is not able to edit for IPv6
   address, although in the DB table it has the colum ready , but UI doesn not
   allow to edit.
   
   
   
   
   On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:28 PM Rohit Yadav  wrote:
   
   > Thanks for explaining @hstan77  this looks
   > like security groups only feature that isn't supported in new UI, you can
   > use legacy UI or API for the use-case until we address this. Since this is
   > infra-related feature accessible only to the root admin it may not be
   > considered a blocker cc @DaanHoogland 
   > (you agree?)
   >
   > @davidjumani  since you've already
   > started a PR, let me give you some pointers -- for SG the guest network is
   > uses the public network, where the IP range is consumed directly by the end
   > VMs than a virtual network; we probably want to add a tab in the guest
   > networks (SG guest networks only) which are treated as shared network with
   > vlan ip/ranges. This tab should list the range with pagination, for ex:
   >
   > command: listVlanIpRanges
   > zoneid: f4bca7d3-81ce-4bfe-9c50-56acf057844b
   > networkid: 8932951f-4ea2-49e2-9c83-65c16ef4fd04
   > page: 1
   > pagesize: 20
   > response: json
   >
   > On top of the tab we can give a button to open a modal/form that takes
   > input to create new range, for example: (note, the parameter
   > forVirtualNetwork is false)
   >
   > command: createVlanIpRange
   > forVirtualNetwork: false
   > networkid: 8932951f-4ea2-49e2-9c83-65c16ef4fd04
   > gateway: 192.168.1.1
   > netmask: 255.255.255.0
   > startip: 192.168.1.100
   > endip: 192.168.1.200
   > response: json
   >
   > —
   > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
   > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
   > 
,
   > or unsubscribe
   > 

   > .
   >
   
   
   -- 
   Regards,
   Hean Seng
   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: Advanced zone setup

2021-01-04 Thread Wei ZHOU

Hi,

If you want vms to have ips in your local network,  You can create multiple
shared networks with vlan isolated, for example 10.66.100.0/24 with vlan
1000. This is supported in both advanced zone with advanced networking, and
advanced zone with security groups.
The difference is, (1) in advanced zone you can also create vm in isolated
networks (with ip in guest vm cidr); (2) in advanced zone with security
groups, you cannot create vm in isolated networks, but vms can have
security groups, see
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/networking/security_groups.html

-Wei

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 07:34, Support Admin 
wrote:

> *Hello,*
>
> I am install CT using basic zone, so all is ok and ping instance from my
> local network.
>
> So I decide setup Advanced zone, Can I setup Advanced zone without WAN
> interface as like instance ping from my local network. Is it possible or
> not. (with vLAN or without vLAN)
>
> Sytemvm got ip from local network but instance got ip from guest cidir
> 10.0.0/24, My local network 10.66.0.0/16 so instance not ping from my
> local network.
>
> --
>
> *Thanks & Regards.*
>
> Support Admin
>
> Facebook  | Twitter
>  | Website 
>
> 116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
>
> Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
>
> *Mob :* +088 01716915504
>
> *Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com
>
> *Web :* www.technologyrss.com 
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Wido den Hollander




On 1/4/21 9:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to specify 
> the rados monitor port (such as 10.100.250.14:6789) in the UI form when you 
> add a ceph rbd pool. For example, via API the url parameter would look like: 
> "rbd://cephtest:AQC3u_JfhipzGBAACiILEFKembN8gTJsIvu6nQ==@192.168.1.10:6789/cephtest"
> 
> @Daan Hoogland @Gabriel Beims 
> Bräscher @Wido 
> Hollander @Wei ZHOU - 
> the issue seems to be rbd pool fails to be added if a port is not specified - 
> what do you think, should we treat this as blocker or document it (i.e. ask 
> admins to specify rados monitor port)?

I would not say this is a blocker for now. Ceph is moving away from port
6789 as the default and libvirt is already handling this.

This needs to be fixed though and I see that a ticket is open for this.
I'll look into this with Gabriel.

Keep in mind that port numer 6789 is not the default for Ceph! Messenger
v2 uses port 3300 and therefor it's best not to specify any port and
have the Ceph client sort this out.

In addition I would always suggest to use a hostname with Ceph and not a
static IP of a monitor. Round Robin DNS pointing to the monitors is the
most reliable solution.

Wido

> 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> From: li jerry 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 13:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> Hi Rohit
> 
> Yes, I didn't specify a port when I added primary storage;
> 
> After r failed, I checked with virsh and found that the pool had been created 
> successfully, and the capacity, allocation and available of RBD could be 
> displayed.
> So I'm sure it's not the wrong key.
> 
> 
> Please note that:
> In the output pool dump, I see that there is no port target under host
> But the code gets port and converts it to int
> 
> String port = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host", "port", source));
> 
> 
> 
> virsh pool-dumpxml d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> 
> d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> 12122373201920
> 912457728
> 11998204379136
> 
> 
> rbd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Jerry
> 
> 发件人: Rohit Yadav
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 15:32
> 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> Hi Jerry,
> 
> Can you see my reply? I'm able to add a RBD primary storage if I specify the 
> port, should we still consider it a blocker then?
> 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> From: li jerry 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:52
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Cc: dev 
> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> I'm creating PR to fix this.
> 
> I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be 
> unable to be added.
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Daan Hoogland 
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57
> 收件人: users 
> 抄送: dev 
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> looks good Jerry,
> Are you making a PR? It seems to me that this would not be a blocker and 
> should go in future releases. Please argue against me if you disagree.
> 
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:48 AM li jerry  wrote:
> 
>> - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
>> - Did you fresh install or upgrade?
>>
>> No, This is a new deployment, there are no upgrades
>>
>> I have changed two methods. At present, RBD storage is running
>>
>>
>> /cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStoragePoolXMLParser.java
>> //String _xmlPort = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host",
>> "port", source));
>> int port = 0;
>> String _xmlPort = getAttrValue("host", "port", source);
>> if ( ! _xmlPort.isEmpty()) {
>> port = Integer.parseInt(_xmlPort);
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> /cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtDomainXMLParser.java
>> //int port = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host",
>> "port", disk));
>> int port = 0;
>> String _xmlPort = getAttrValue("host", "port", disk);
>> if ( ! _xmlPort.isEmpty()) {
>> port = Integer.parseInt(_xmlPort);
>> }
>>
>>
>> -Jerry
>>
>> 发件人: Daan Hoogland

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Wei ZHOU

+1.

Tested the following
(1) upgrade from 4.14 to 4.15
(2) tested vm,template,volume lifecycles.

The only issues I faced are
(1) https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4146
(2) marvin cannot be installed and executed on Ubuntu 20.04
I think they are not blockers.

-Wei


On Wed, 23 Dec 2020 at 18:44, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> LS,
> After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other than
> bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and on
> vmware.
>
> We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
>
> The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is still
> separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming releases,
> at least from a version management point of view.
> I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up
> for a vote:Git Branches:
> main code:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
> <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124
> >
> ui code:
> <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.0
> >
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
> and Commit SH:
> main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
> ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev. 45059)
> PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will be
> open
> for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members
> please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging over
> the next few days.
> The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Rohit Yadav

Great thanks for replying Wido. @Daan 
Hoogland I think we can continue with RC3 
vote/tally, I'll send a doc PR.


Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 14:35
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav 
; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]



On 1/4/21 9:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to specify 
> the rados monitor port (such as 10.100.250.14:6789) in the UI form when you 
> add a ceph rbd pool. For example, via API the url parameter would look like: 
> "rbd://cephtest:AQC3u_JfhipzGBAACiILEFKembN8gTJsIvu6nQ==@192.168.1.10:6789/cephtest"
>
> @Daan Hoogland @Gabriel Beims 
> Bräscher @Wido 
> Hollander @Wei ZHOU - 
> the issue seems to be rbd pool fails to be added if a port is not specified - 
> what do you think, should we treat this as blocker or document it (i.e. ask 
> admins to specify rados monitor port)?

I would not say this is a blocker for now. Ceph is moving away from port
6789 as the default and libvirt is already handling this.

This needs to be fixed though and I see that a ticket is open for this.
I'll look into this with Gabriel.

Keep in mind that port numer 6789 is not the default for Ceph! Messenger
v2 uses port 3300 and therefor it's best not to specify any port and
have the Ceph client sort this out.

In addition I would always suggest to use a hostname with Ceph and not a
static IP of a monitor. Round Robin DNS pointing to the monitors is the
most reliable solution.

Wido

>
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: li jerry 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 13:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> Hi Rohit
>
> Yes, I didn't specify a port when I added primary storage;
>
> After r failed, I checked with virsh and found that the pool had been created 
> successfully, and the capacity, allocation and available of RBD could be 
> displayed.
> So I'm sure it's not the wrong key.
>
>
> Please note that:
> In the output pool dump, I see that there is no port target under host
> But the code gets port and converts it to int
>
> String port = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host", "port", source));
>
>
>
> virsh pool-dumpxml d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> 
> d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> 12122373201920
> 912457728
> 11998204379136
> 
> 
> rbd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> -Jerry
>
> 发件人: Rohit Yadav
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 15:32
> 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Can you see my reply? I'm able to add a RBD primary storage if I specify the 
> port, should we still consider it a blocker then?
>
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: li jerry 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:52
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Cc: dev 
> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> I'm creating PR to fix this.
>
> I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be 
> unable to be added.
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Daan Hoogland 
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57
> 收件人: users 
> 抄送: dev 
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> looks good Jerry,
> Are you making a PR? It seems to me that this would not be a blocker and 
> should go in future releases. Please argue against me if you disagree.
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:48 AM li jerry  wrote:
>
>> - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?
>> - Did you fresh install or upgrade?
>>
>> No, This is a new deployment, there are no upgrades
>>
>> I have changed two methods. At present, RBD storage is running
>>
>>
>> /cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtStoragePoolXMLParser.java
>> //String _xmlPort = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host",
>> "port", source));
>> int port = 0;
>> String _xmlPort = getAttrValue("host", "port", source);
>> if ( ! _xmlPort.isEmpty()) {
>>

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd opened a new pull request #175: installguide: add note on parameter docs for adding ceph primary storage

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



rhtyd opened a new pull request #175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] ACSGitBot commented on pull request #175: installguide: add note on parameter docs for adding ceph primary storage

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



ACSGitBot commented on pull request #175:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175#issuecomment-753912763


   Your request had been received, i'll go and build the documentation and 
check the output log for errors.
   
   This shouldn't take long.
   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd commented on pull request #175: installguide: add note on parameter docs for adding ceph primary storage

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



rhtyd commented on pull request #175:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175#issuecomment-753912727


   requesting docbuild



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Rohit Yadav

Jerry, Wido, Daan - kindly review 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175/files


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 16:25
To: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Great thanks for replying Wido. @Daan 
Hoogland I think we can continue with RC3 
vote/tally, I'll send a doc PR.


Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 14:35
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav 
; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]



On 1/4/21 9:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to specify 
> the rados monitor port (such as 10.100.250.14:6789) in the UI form when you 
> add a ceph rbd pool. For example, via API the url parameter would look like: 
> "rbd://cephtest:AQC3u_JfhipzGBAACiILEFKembN8gTJsIvu6nQ==@192.168.1.10:6789/cephtest"
>
> @Daan Hoogland @Gabriel Beims 
> Bräscher @Wido 
> Hollander @Wei ZHOU - 
> the issue seems to be rbd pool fails to be added if a port is not specified - 
> what do you think, should we treat this as blocker or document it (i.e. ask 
> admins to specify rados monitor port)?

I would not say this is a blocker for now. Ceph is moving away from port
6789 as the default and libvirt is already handling this.

This needs to be fixed though and I see that a ticket is open for this.
I'll look into this with Gabriel.

Keep in mind that port numer 6789 is not the default for Ceph! Messenger
v2 uses port 3300 and therefor it's best not to specify any port and
have the Ceph client sort this out.

In addition I would always suggest to use a hostname with Ceph and not a
static IP of a monitor. Round Robin DNS pointing to the monitors is the
most reliable solution.

Wido

>
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: li jerry 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 13:10
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> Hi Rohit
>
> Yes, I didn't specify a port when I added primary storage;
>
> After r failed, I checked with virsh and found that the pool had been created 
> successfully, and the capacity, allocation and available of RBD could be 
> displayed.
> So I'm sure it's not the wrong key.
>
>
> Please note that:
> In the output pool dump, I see that there is no port target under host
> But the code gets port and converts it to int
>
> String port = Integer.parseInt(getAttrValue("host", "port", source));
>
>
>
> virsh pool-dumpxml d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> 
> d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> d9b976cb-bcaf-320a-94e6-b337e65dd4f5
> 12122373201920
> 912457728
> 11998204379136
> 
> 
> rbd
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> -Jerry
>
> 发件人: Rohit Yadav
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 15:32
> 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; 
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> Hi Jerry,
>
> Can you see my reply? I'm able to add a RBD primary storage if I specify the 
> port, should we still consider it a blocker then?
>
>
> Regards.
>
> 
> From: li jerry 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 12:52
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Cc: dev 
> Subject: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> I'm creating PR to fix this.
>
> I think we should block, because it will cause the RBD primary storage to be 
> unable to be added.
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Daan Hoogland 
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 14:57
> 收件人: users 
> 抄送: dev 
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>
> looks good Jerry,
> Are you making a PR? It seems to me that this would not be a blocker and 
> should go in future releases. Please argue against me if you disagree.
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>

rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:48 AM li jerry  wrote:
>
>> - Is this a setup that does work with a prior version?

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] ACSGitBot commented on pull request #175: installguide: add note on parameter docs for adding ceph primary storage

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



ACSGitBot commented on pull request #175:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175#issuecomment-753913873


   Build finished.  You can review it at:   
https://acs-www.shapeblue.com/docs/WIP-PROOFING/pr175//
   
   Build Log Output:
   
   
   No log errors found to report.//



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Daan Hoogland

Hi all,

After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0 *passes* with
4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
* Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel

+1 (non binding)
* Abhishek

0
none

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating.

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
to give the mirrors time to catch up.


On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> LS,
> After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other than
> bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and on
> vmware.
>
> We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
>
> The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is still
> separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming releases,
> at least from a version management point of view.
> I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts up
> for a vote:Git Branches:
> main code:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
> 
> ui code:
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
> and Commit SH:
> main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
> ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
>
> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> location):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev. 45059)
> PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will be
> open for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC
> members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1
> approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging over
> the next few days.
> The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>


-- 
Daan

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] DaanHoogland merged pull request #175: installguide: add note on parameter docs for adding ceph primary storage

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



DaanHoogland merged pull request #175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread li jerry

Hi Rohit and Wido


According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary storage
monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789

(createStoragePool api :
  url: 
rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@10.100.250.14:6789/rbd
)
The primary storage is added successfully.

But, now there are new problems.

Error when executing template copy from secondary to primary storage (rbd)
(This operation is creating system VM SSVM/CPVM)

Here is the error message:
2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) copyPhysicalDisk: disk 
size:(356.96 MB) 374304768, virtualsize:(2.44 GB) 262144 format:qcow2
2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) The source image is not RBD, but 
the destination is. We will convert into RBD format 2
2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Starting copy from source image 
/mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
 to RBD image rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a
2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing: qemu-img convert -O 
raw 
/mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
 
rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
2021-01-04 11:20:26,303 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing while with timeout : 
1080
2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Exit value is 1
2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) qemu-img: 
rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
 error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No such 
file or directory
2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Failed to convert from 
/mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
 to 
rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
 the error was: qemu-img: 
rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
 error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No such 
file or directory
2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Attempting to remove storage 
pool 466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97 from libvirt
2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Looking for libvirtd connection 
at: qemu:///system


-邮件原件-
发件人: Rohit Yadav 
发送时间: 2021年1月4日 19:09
收件人: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; Wei 
ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Jerry, Wido, Daan - kindly review 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175/files


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 16:25
To: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Great thanks for replying Wido. @Daan 
Hoogland I think we can continue with RC3 
vote/tally, I'll send a doc PR.


Regards.


From: Wido den Hollander 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 14:35
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav 
; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]



On 1/4/21 9:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to specify 
> the rados monitor port (such as 10.100.250.14:6789) in the UI form when you 
> add a ceph rbd pool. For example, via API the url parameter would look like: 
> "rbd://cephtest:AQC3u_JfhipzGBAACiILEFKembN8gTJsIvu6nQ==@192.168.1.10:6789/cephtest"
>
> @Daan Hoogland @Gabriel Beims 
> Bräscher @Wido 
> Hollander @Wei ZHOU

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Daan Hoogland

I forgot to rename the thread so for archive purposes, this.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:18 AM Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0 *passes* with
> 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
>
> +1 (PMC / binding)
> * Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel
>
> +1 (non binding)
> * Abhishek
>
> 0
> none
>
> -1
> none
>
> Thanks to everyone participating.
>
> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give 
> the mirrors time to catch up.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
>> LS,
>> After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other
>> than bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and
>> on vmware.
>>
>> We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
>>
>> The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is still
>> separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming releases,
>> at least from a version management point of view.
>> I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
>> up for a vote:Git Branches:
>> main code:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
>> 
>> ui code:
>> 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
>> and Commit SH:
>> main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
>> ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
>>
>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
>> location):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev. 45059)
>> PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will be
>> open for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC
>> members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1
>> approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging over
>> the next few days.
>> The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>


-- 
Daan

[ANNOUNCE] master and 4.15 branches open for merge

2021-01-04 Thread Daan Hoogland

Finally, both master and the new 4.15 branch are open for merging given our
merge guidelines. I wish all of us much productivity.

-- 
Daan

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Wei ZHOU

Hi Daan and Rohit,

Sorry I would like to recall my +1.

I think the ceph issue is a blocker.

-Wei



On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 12:18, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0 *passes*
> with
> 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
>
> +1 (PMC / binding)
> * Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel
>
> +1 (non binding)
> * Abhishek
>
> 0
> none
>
> -1
> none
>
> Thanks to everyone participating.
>
> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
> to give the mirrors time to catch up.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
> > LS,
> > After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other
> than
> > bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and on
> > vmware.
> >
> > We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
> >
> > The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is still
> > separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming
> releases,
> > at least from a version management point of view.
> > I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> up
> > for a vote:Git Branches:
> > main code:
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
> > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124
> >
> > ui code:
> > <
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.0
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
> > and Commit SH:
> > main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
> > ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
> >
> > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > location):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev. 45059)
> > PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will be
> > open for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC
> > members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1
> > approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging over
> > the next few days.
> > The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

[GitHub] [cloudstack-www] DaanHoogland opened a new pull request #78: site updates for 4.15

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



DaanHoogland opened a new pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/78


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Daan Hoogland

ok, can you expand Wei?

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:51 AM Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi Daan and Rohit,
>
> Sorry I would like to recall my +1.
>
> I think the ceph issue is a blocker.
>
> -Wei
>
>
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 12:18, Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0 *passes*
> > with
> > 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
> >
> > +1 (PMC / binding)
> > * Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> > * Abhishek
> >
> > 0
> > none
> >
> > -1
> > none
> >
> > Thanks to everyone participating.
> >
> > I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
> > to give the mirrors time to catch up.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Daan Hoogland 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > LS,
> > > After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other
> > than
> > > bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and
> on
> > > vmware.
> > >
> > > We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
> > >
> > > The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is
> still
> > > separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming
> > releases,
> > > at least from a version management point of view.
> > > I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following artifacts
> > up
> > > for a vote:Git Branches:
> > > main code:
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
> > > <
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124
> > >
> > > ui code:
> > > <
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.0
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
> > > and Commit SH:
> > > main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
> > > ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
> > >
> > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > location):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev.
> 45059)
> > > PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will be
> > > open for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC
> > > members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1
> > > approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging
> over
> > > the next few days.
> > > The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daan
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>


-- 
Daan

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] onitake commented on pull request #132: cloud-init and UserData service documentation cleanup

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



onitake commented on pull request #132:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/132#issuecomment-753943580


   Sorry for the delay, I'll look into this until tomorrow.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-www] andrijapanicsb commented on pull request #78: site updates for 4.15

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



andrijapanicsb commented on pull request #78:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/pull/78#issuecomment-753943734


   "archives" should probably have 4.15 branch and 4.15.0.0 added, if the 
current one (4.14) looks OK. LGTM otherwise.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] onitake commented on pull request #172: Update user-data.rst

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



onitake commented on pull request #172:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/172#issuecomment-753944049


   Hi @NPdocker - can you clarify why this PR is necessary?
   Was there a configuration format change in cloud-init?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Wido den Hollander




On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote:
> Hi Rohit and Wido
> 
> 
> According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary storage
> monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789
> 
> (createStoragePool api :
>   url: 
> rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@10.100.250.14:6789/rbd
> )
> The primary storage is added successfully.
> 
> But, now there are new problems.
> 
> Error when executing template copy from secondary to primary storage (rbd)
> (This operation is creating system VM SSVM/CPVM)
> 
> Here is the error message:
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) copyPhysicalDisk: disk 
> size:(356.96 MB) 374304768, virtualsize:(2.44 GB) 262144 format:qcow2
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) The source image is not RBD, 
> but the destination is. We will convert into RBD format 2
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Starting copy from source 
> image 
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
>  to RBD image rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing: qemu-img convert -O 
> raw 
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
>  
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,303 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing while with timeout : 
> 1080
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Exit value is 1
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) qemu-img: 
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
>  error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No such 
> file or directory

There seems to be a double-escape here. That might the culprit.

'mon_host=10.100.250.14\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx'

It might be that it needs to be that string.

Wido

> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Failed to convert from 
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
>  to 
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
>  the error was: qemu-img: 
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
>  error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No such 
> file or directory
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Attempting to remove storage 
> pool 466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97 from libvirt
> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Looking for libvirtd 
> connection at: qemu:///system
> 
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Rohit Yadav 
> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 19:09
> 收件人: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
> Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> Jerry, Wido, Daan - kindly review 
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175/files
> 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 16:25
> To: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
> Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> Great thanks for replying Wido. @Daan 
> Hoogland I think we can continue with RC3 
> vote/tally, I'll send a doc PR.
> 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> From: Wido den Hollander 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 14:35
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ; Rohit Yadav 
> ; us...@cloudstack.apache.org 
> ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ; 
> Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/4/21 9:50 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>> Thanks for replying Jerry - for now, the workaround you can use is to 
>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Wei ZHOU

Hi Daan,

Could you please look at the issue Jerry mentioned in another thread ? It
seems critical.
It would be nice if more people test ceph storage on different ubuntu and
centos versions. It is not covered by jenkins/travis/trillian tests.

-Wei

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:18, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> ok, can you expand Wei?
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:51 AM Wei ZHOU  wrote:
>
> > Hi Daan and Rohit,
> >
> > Sorry I would like to recall my +1.
> >
> > I think the ceph issue is a blocker.
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 12:18, Daan Hoogland 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0
> *passes*
> > > with
> > > 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
> > >
> > > +1 (PMC / binding)
> > > * Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel
> > >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > > * Abhishek
> > >
> > > 0
> > > none
> > >
> > > -1
> > > none
> > >
> > > Thanks to everyone participating.
> > >
> > > I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
> > > to give the mirrors time to catch up.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Daan Hoogland  >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > LS,
> > > > After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes (other
> > > than
> > > > bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates and
> > on
> > > > vmware.
> > > >
> > > > We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
> > > >
> > > > The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is
> > still
> > > > separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming
> > > releases,
> > > > at least from a version management point of view.
> > > > I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following
> artifacts
> > > up
> > > > for a vote:Git Branches:
> > > > main code:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124
> > > >
> > > > ui code:
> > > > <
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
> > > > and Commit SH:
> > > > main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
> > > > ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
> > > >
> > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > > location):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev.
> > 45059)
> > > > PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote will
> be
> > > > open for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC
> > > > members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ] +1
> > > > approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging
> > over
> > > > the next few days.
> > > > The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Daan
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daan
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Daan Hoogland

I agree on ceph testing, but I see all Jerry's questions/reports answered
by Rohit and Wido. Can you say what is the reason for your -1/what is the
blocker issue? I reopened the milestone for 4.15.0.0 which I had just
closed, so if you and/or Jerry can create an issue on github we can discuss
further steps there.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 12:29 PM Wei ZHOU  wrote:

> Hi Daan,
>
> Could you please look at the issue Jerry mentioned in another thread ? It
> seems critical.
> It would be nice if more people test ceph storage on different ubuntu and
> centos versions. It is not covered by jenkins/travis/trillian tests.
>
> -Wei
>
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:18, Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
> > ok, can you expand Wei?
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:51 AM Wei ZHOU  wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Daan and Rohit,
> > >
> > > Sorry I would like to recall my +1.
> > >
> > > I think the ceph issue is a blocker.
> > >
> > > -Wei
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 12:18, Daan Hoogland 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > After 72 hours (+the holidays), the vote for CloudStack 4.15.0.0
> > *passes*
> > > > with
> > > > 4 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (PMC / binding)
> > > > * Wei, Boris, Rohit, Gabriel
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non binding)
> > > > * Abhishek
> > > >
> > > > 0
> > > > none
> > > >
> > > > -1
> > > > none
> > > >
> > > > Thanks to everyone participating.
> > > >
> > > > I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
> > > > to give the mirrors time to catch up.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 5:43 PM Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > LS,
> > > > > After fixing another few blockers, we have an RC3, The changes
> (other
> > > > than
> > > > > bundling) are mostly interesting for those working with templates
> and
> > > on
> > > > > vmware.
> > > > >
> > > > > We are voting for the new UI and the main code.
> > > > >
> > > > > The candidate release branch is 4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632. The UI is
> > > still
> > > > > separate but as agreed upon before this will be merged in coming
> > > > releases,
> > > > > at least from a version management point of view.
> > > > > I've created a 4.15.0.0 release candidate, with the following
> > artifacts
> > > > up
> > > > > for a vote:Git Branches:
> > > > > main code:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201223T1632
> > > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.15.0.0-RC20201214T1124
> > > > >
> > > > > ui code:
> > > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/1.0
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack-primate.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/1.0
> > > > > and Commit SH:
> > > > > main code: 01b3e361c7bb81fd1ea822faddd6594e52bb00c1
> > > > > ui code: 0593302dd53ac3203d3ab43b62d890605910f3e1
> > > > >
> > > > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
> > > > > location):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.15.0.0/ (rev.
> > > 45059)
> > > > > PGP release keys (signed using 7975062401944786):
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYSVote
> will
> > be
> > > > > open for (at least) 72 hours.For sanity in tallying the vote, can
> PMC
> > > > > members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote?[ ]
> +1
> > > > > approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > I will work with community members to provide convenience packaging
> > > over
> > > > > the next few days.
> > > > > The documentation repo will be updated as we move along.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Daan
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Daan
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
> >
>


-- 
Daan

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Andrija Panic

Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work
with any CloudStack version so far?


On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:13, Wido den Hollander  wrote:

>
>
> On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote:
> > Hi Rohit and Wido
> >
> >
> > According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary
> storage
> > monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789
> >
> > (createStoragePool api :
> >   url: rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@
> 10.100.250.14:6789/rbd
> > )
> > The primary storage is added successfully.
> >
> > But, now there are new problems.
> >
> > Error when executing template copy from secondary to primary storage
> (rbd)
> > (This operation is creating system VM SSVM/CPVM)
> >
> > Here is the error message:
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) copyPhysicalDisk: disk
> size:(356.96 MB) 374304768, virtualsize:(2.44 GB) 262144 format:qcow2
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) The source image is not RBD,
> but the destination is. We will convert into RBD format 2
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Starting copy from source
> image
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
> to RBD image rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing: qemu-img convert
> -O raw
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,303 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing while with timeout
> : 1080
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Exit value is 1
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) qemu-img:
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
> error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No
> such file or directory
>
> There seems to be a double-escape here. That might the culprit.
>
> 'mon_host=10.100.250.14\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx'
>
> It might be that it needs to be that string.
>
> Wido
>
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Failed to convert from
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
> to
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
> the error was: qemu-img:
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
> error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No
> such file or directory
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Attempting to remove storage
> pool 466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97 from libvirt
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Looking for libvirtd
> connection at: qemu:///system
> >
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: Rohit Yadav 
> > 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 19:09
> > 收件人: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ;
> Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
> > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> >
> > Jerry, Wido, Daan - kindly review
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175/files
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > 
> > From: Rohit Yadav 
> > Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 16:25
> > To: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <
> dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; us...@cloudstack.apache.org <
> us...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ;
> Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland <
> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> >
> > Great thanks for replying Wido. @Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com> I think we can continue with RC3 vote/tally,
> I'll send a doc PR.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> > 
> > From: Wido den Hollander 
> > Sent: Monda

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Wido den Hollander




On 1/4/21 1:42 PM, Andrija Panic wrote:
> Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work
> with any CloudStack version so far?
> 

Yes. Running it in production on Ubuntu 18.04 hypervisors and Ceph servers.

This is with CloudStack 4.13.1

Wido

> 
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:13, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote:
>>> Hi Rohit and Wido
>>>
>>>
>>> According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary
>> storage
>>> monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789
>>>
>>> (createStoragePool api :
>>>   url: rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@
>> 10.100.250.14:6789/rbd
>>> )
>>> The primary storage is added successfully.
>>>
>>> But, now there are new problems.
>>>
>>> Error when executing template copy from secondary to primary storage
>> (rbd)
>>> (This operation is creating system VM SSVM/CPVM)
>>>
>>> Here is the error message:
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) copyPhysicalDisk: disk
>> size:(356.96 MB) 374304768, virtualsize:(2.44 GB) 262144 format:qcow2
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) The source image is not RBD,
>> but the destination is. We will convert into RBD format 2
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Starting copy from source
>> image
>> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
>> to RBD image rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing: qemu-img convert
>> -O raw
>> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
>> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,303 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing while with timeout
>> : 1080
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Exit value is 1
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) qemu-img:
>> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
>> error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No
>> such file or directory
>>
>> There seems to be a double-escape here. That might the culprit.
>>
>> 'mon_host=10.100.250.14\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx'
>>
>> It might be that it needs to be that string.
>>
>> Wido
>>
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Failed to convert from
>> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
>> to
>> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
>> the error was: qemu-img:
>> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
>> error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No
>> such file or directory
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 INFO  [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Attempting to remove storage
>> pool 466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97 from libvirt
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,384 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtConnection]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Looking for libvirtd
>> connection at: qemu:///system
>>>
>>>
>>> -邮件原件-
>>> 发件人: Rohit Yadav 
>>> 发送时间: 2021年1月4日 19:09
>>> 收件人: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org;
>> us...@cloudstack.apache.org; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ;
>> Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
>>> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>>>
>>> Jerry, Wido, Daan - kindly review
>> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/175/files
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> 
>>> From: Rohit Yadav 
>>> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 16:25
>>> To: Wido den Hollander ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org <
>> dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; us...@cloudstack.apache.org <
>> us...@cloudstack.apache.org>; Gabriel Beims Bräscher ;
>> Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogl...@shapeblue.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
>>>
>>> Great thanks for replying

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Rohit Yadav

All,

I've tested a toy Ubuntu 20.04.1 + Ceph 15.2.7 + ACS 4.15RC3 env, and I think 
the issue is coming from libvirt or rados java. This was seen on an existing 
Ceph cluster added prior to upgrade (upgrade to both ACS 4.15RC3 which bundles 
a new rados-java v0.6.0 dependency) where VM deployment previously used to work 
but now does not:

2021-01-04 12:43:57,151 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) (logid:1594715e) Failed to convert from 
/mnt/cbd31927-e6e2-3c53-92b2-2e16d74ce36c/a87a71f5--371c-867c-ca96abe58395.qcow2
 to 
rbd:meowceph/d9eb3660-23e5-4b37-85ec-b6ad4978bf22:mon_host=192.168.1.10\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=meowceph:key=AQA6U5VfIY1lFRAAFTgZvKhyQrYHyTRrdnTsrg==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
 the error was: qemu-img: 
rbd:meowceph/d9eb3660-23e5-4b37-85ec-b6ad4978bf22:mon_host=192.168.1.10\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=meowceph:key=AQA6U5VfIY1lFRAAFTgZvKhyQrYHyTRrdnTsrg==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
 error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No such 
file or directory

Env details:
# ceph --version
ceph version 15.2.7 (88e41c6c49beb18add4fdb6b4326ca466d931db8) octopus (stable)
# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
Release: 20.04
Codename: focal
# virsh version
Compiled against library: libvirt 6.0.0
Using library: libvirt 6.0.0
Using API: QEMU 6.0.0
Running hypervisor: QEMU 4.2.1

Since both Ubuntu 20.04 and Ceph 15.2.x are new, we need a regression test of 
4.15RC3 with an working/older env say 18.04 (with older and stable 
qemu/libvirt) + Ceph 13.x/14.x. Can you help - @Wido 
Hollander @Gabriel Beims 
Bräscher @Wei 
Zhou and other ceph users/experts? Thanks.

Regards.


From: Andrija Panic 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 18:12
To: users 
Cc: dev ; li jerry ; Gabriel 
Beims Bräscher ; Wei ZHOU ; Daan 
Hoogland 
Subject: Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work
with any CloudStack version so far?



rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:13, Wido den Hollander  wrote:

>
>
> On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote:
> > Hi Rohit and Wido
> >
> >
> > According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary
> storage
> > monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789
> >
> > (createStoragePool api :
> >   url: rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@
> 10.100.250.14:6789/rbd
> > )
> > The primary storage is added successfully.
> >
> > But, now there are new problems.
> >
> > Error when executing template copy from secondary to primary storage
> (rbd)
> > (This operation is creating system VM SSVM/CPVM)
> >
> > Here is the error message:
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) copyPhysicalDisk: disk
> size:(356.96 MB) 374304768, virtualsize:(2.44 GB) 262144 format:qcow2
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) The source image is not RBD,
> but the destination is. We will convert into RBD format 2
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Starting copy from source
> image
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
> to RBD image rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing: qemu-img convert
> -O raw
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,303 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing while with timeout
> : 1080
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Exit value is 1
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,383 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) qemu-img:
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
> error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No
> such file or directory
>
> There seems to be a double-escape here. That might the culprit.
>
> 'mon_host=10.100.250.14\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx'
>
> It might be that it needs to be that string.

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Rohit Yadav

On comparing git history, turns out the double escaping was added in this PR:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4231

@Wido Hollander can you advise how this was tested 
and can you advise mitigation of the double escape issue or send a PR?


Regards.


From: Rohit Yadav 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 18:20
To: users ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
; Wido Hollander ; Wei Zhou 

Cc: li jerry ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher 
; Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 

Subject: Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

All,

I've tested a toy Ubuntu 20.04.1 + Ceph 15.2.7 + ACS 4.15RC3 env, and I think 
the issue is coming from libvirt or rados java. This was seen on an existing 
Ceph cluster added prior to upgrade (upgrade to both ACS 4.15RC3 which bundles 
a new rados-java v0.6.0 dependency) where VM deployment previously used to work 
but now does not:

2021-01-04 12:43:57,151 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
(agentRequest-Handler-4:null) (logid:1594715e) Failed to convert from 
/mnt/cbd31927-e6e2-3c53-92b2-2e16d74ce36c/a87a71f5--371c-867c-ca96abe58395.qcow2
 to 
rbd:meowceph/d9eb3660-23e5-4b37-85ec-b6ad4978bf22:mon_host=192.168.1.10\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=meowceph:key=AQA6U5VfIY1lFRAAFTgZvKhyQrYHyTRrdnTsrg==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
 the error was: qemu-img: 
rbd:meowceph/d9eb3660-23e5-4b37-85ec-b6ad4978bf22:mon_host=192.168.1.10\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=meowceph:key=AQA6U5VfIY1lFRAAFTgZvKhyQrYHyTRrdnTsrg==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
 error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No such 
file or directory

Env details:
# ceph --version
ceph version 15.2.7 (88e41c6c49beb18add4fdb6b4326ca466d931db8) octopus (stable)
# lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
Release: 20.04
Codename: focal
# virsh version
Compiled against library: libvirt 6.0.0
Using library: libvirt 6.0.0
Using API: QEMU 6.0.0
Running hypervisor: QEMU 4.2.1

Since both Ubuntu 20.04 and Ceph 15.2.x are new, we need a regression test of 
4.15RC3 with an working/older env say 18.04 (with older and stable 
qemu/libvirt) + Ceph 13.x/14.x. Can you help - @Wido 
Hollander @Gabriel Beims 
Bräscher @Wei 
Zhou and other ceph users/experts? Thanks.

Regards.


From: Andrija Panic 
Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 18:12
To: users 
Cc: dev ; li jerry ; Gabriel 
Beims Bräscher ; Wei ZHOU ; Daan 
Hoogland 
Subject: Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work
with any CloudStack version so far?



rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue




rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
www.shapeblue.com
3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
@shapeblue
  
 

On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:13, Wido den Hollander  wrote:

>
>
> On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote:
> > Hi Rohit and Wido
> >
> >
> > According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary
> storage
> > monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789
> >
> > (createStoragePool api :
> >   url: rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@
> 10.100.250.14:6789/rbd
> > )
> > The primary storage is added successfully.
> >
> > But, now there are new problems.
> >
> > Error when executing template copy from secondary to primary storage
> (rbd)
> > (This operation is creating system VM SSVM/CPVM)
> >
> > Here is the error message:
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) copyPhysicalDisk: disk
> size:(356.96 MB) 374304768, virtualsize:(2.44 GB) 262144 format:qcow2
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) The source image is not RBD,
> but the destination is. We will convert into RBD format 2
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Starting copy from source
> image
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
> to RBD image rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing: qemu-img convert
> -O raw
> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
> rbd:rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a:mon_host=10.100.250.14\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=hyperx:key=AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
> > 2021-01-04 11:20:26,303 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing while with timeou

Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]

2021-01-04 Thread Wido den Hollander




On 1/4/21 2:05 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
> On comparing git history, turns out the double escaping was added in this PR:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4231
> 

The double-escape was only wrapped into an if-statement in that PR, it
was always there it seems.

So we might be facing a different situation here.

Wido

> @Wido Hollander can you advise how this was tested 
> and can you advise mitigation of the double escape issue or send a PR?
> 
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> From: Rohit Yadav 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 18:20
> To: users ; dev@cloudstack.apache.org 
> ; Wido Hollander ; Wei Zhou 
> 
> Cc: li jerry ; Gabriel Beims Bräscher 
> ; Wei ZHOU ; Daan Hoogland 
> 
> Subject: Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> All,
> 
> I've tested a toy Ubuntu 20.04.1 + Ceph 15.2.7 + ACS 4.15RC3 env, and I think 
> the issue is coming from libvirt or rados java. This was seen on an existing 
> Ceph cluster added prior to upgrade (upgrade to both ACS 4.15RC3 which 
> bundles a new rados-java v0.6.0 dependency) where VM deployment previously 
> used to work but now does not:
> 
> 2021-01-04 12:43:57,151 ERROR [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-4:null) (logid:1594715e) Failed to convert from 
> /mnt/cbd31927-e6e2-3c53-92b2-2e16d74ce36c/a87a71f5--371c-867c-ca96abe58395.qcow2
>  to 
> rbd:meowceph/d9eb3660-23e5-4b37-85ec-b6ad4978bf22:mon_host=192.168.1.10\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=meowceph:key=AQA6U5VfIY1lFRAAFTgZvKhyQrYHyTRrdnTsrg==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30
>  the error was: qemu-img: 
> rbd:meowceph/d9eb3660-23e5-4b37-85ec-b6ad4978bf22:mon_host=192.168.1.10\\:6789:auth_supported=cephx:id=meowceph:key=AQA6U5VfIY1lFRAAFTgZvKhyQrYHyTRrdnTsrg==:rbd_default_format=2:client_mount_timeout=30:
>  error while converting raw: invalid conf option 6789:auth_supported: No such 
> file or directory
> 
> Env details:
> # ceph --version
> ceph version 15.2.7 (88e41c6c49beb18add4fdb6b4326ca466d931db8) octopus 
> (stable)
> # lsb_release -a
> No LSB modules are available.
> Distributor ID: Ubuntu
> Description: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS
> Release: 20.04
> Codename: focal
> # virsh version
> Compiled against library: libvirt 6.0.0
> Using library: libvirt 6.0.0
> Using API: QEMU 6.0.0
> Running hypervisor: QEMU 4.2.1
> 
> Since both Ubuntu 20.04 and Ceph 15.2.x are new, we need a regression test of 
> 4.15RC3 with an working/older env say 18.04 (with older and stable 
> qemu/libvirt) + Ceph 13.x/14.x. Can you help - @Wido 
> Hollander @Gabriel Beims 
> Bräscher @Wei 
> Zhou and other ceph users/experts? Thanks.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> 
> From: Andrija Panic 
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 18:12
> To: users 
> Cc: dev ; li jerry ; Gabriel 
> Beims Bräscher ; Wei ZHOU ; Daan 
> Hoogland 
> Subject: Re: 回复: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.15.0.0 and UI [RC3]
> 
> Side question, has anyone (Wido, Garbiel) ever tested Ceph 15.x to work
> with any CloudStack version so far?
> 
> 
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
> 
> 
> 
> 
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com 
> www.shapeblue.com
> 3 London Bridge Street,  3rd floor, News Building, London  SE1 9SGUK
> @shapeblue
>   
>  
> 
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2021 at 13:13, Wido den Hollander  wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> On 1/4/21 12:25 PM, li jerry wrote:
>>> Hi Rohit and Wido
>>>
>>>
>>> According to the document description, I re-tested adding RBD primary
>> storage
>>> monitor: 10.100.250.14:6789
>>>
>>> (createStoragePool api :
>>>   url: rbd://hyperx:AQAywfFf8jCiIxAAbnDBjX1QQAO9Sj22kUBh7g==@
>> 10.100.250.14:6789/rbd
>>> )
>>> The primary storage is added successfully.
>>>
>>> But, now there are new problems.
>>>
>>> Error when executing template copy from secondary to primary storage
>> (rbd)
>>> (This operation is creating system VM SSVM/CPVM)
>>>
>>> Here is the error message:
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) copyPhysicalDisk: disk
>> size:(356.96 MB) 374304768, virtualsize:(2.44 GB) 262144 format:qcow2
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) The source image is not RBD,
>> but the destination is. We will convert into RBD format 2
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Starting copy from source
>> image
>> /mnt/466f03d4-9dfe-3af4-a042-33a00dae0e97/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a.qcow2
>> to RBD image rbd/40165b83-896c-4693-abe7-9fd96b40ce9a
>>> 2021-01-04 11:20:26,302 DEBUG [utils.script.Script]
>> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:587f5b34) Executing: qemu-img convert
>> -O raw
>> /mnt/466f03

Re: [ANNOUNCE] master and 4.15 branches open for merge

2021-01-04 Thread Daan Hoogland

sorry to second guess this announcement, but after the vote an issue was
decided to be a blocker anyway. Please refrain from merging a while more,
thanks.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:37 AM Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> Finally, both master and the new 4.15 branch are open for merging given
> our merge guidelines. I wish all of us much productivity.
>
> --
> Daan
>

-- 
Daan

Re: [ANNOUNCE] master and 4.15 branches open for merge

2021-01-04 Thread Daan Hoogland

I will revert the version updates if and as soon as we are ready to merge a
fix for the new blocker.

On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 3:04 PM Daan Hoogland 
wrote:

> sorry to second guess this announcement, but after the vote an issue was
> decided to be a blocker anyway. Please refrain from merging a while more,
> thanks.
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 11:37 AM Daan Hoogland 
> wrote:
>
>> Finally, both master and the new 4.15 branch are open for merging given
>> our merge guidelines. I wish all of us much productivity.
>>
>> --
>> Daan
>>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>


-- 
Daan

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] andrijapanicsb commented on a change in pull request #170: systemvm: vmware migration changes

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



andrijapanicsb commented on a change in pull request #170:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/170#discussion_r551395376



##
File path: source/adminguide/systemvm.rst
##
@@ -812,6 +812,13 @@ The administrator can log in to the secondary storage VM 
if needed.
 .. |vr-upgrade.png| image:: /_static/images/vr-upgrade.png
:alt: Button to upgrade VR to use the new template.
 
+Migrating System VMs
+
+
+System VMs (any of the Console Proxy VM, Secondary Storage VM, Virtual Router 
or Load Balancer) can be migrated across hosts using migrateSysteVm API or 
migrate action in the UI. These VMs can be migrated between hosts of the same 
cluster only.
+
+Since 4.16, for VMware, migration of System VMs can also be done a destination 
host in a different cluster belonging to the same pod. Storage migration of the 
stopped System VMs is also supported.

Review comment:
   ```suggestion
   Since CloudStack 4.16, for VMware, migration of System VMs can also be done 
to a destination host in a different cluster belonging to the same pod (in case 
of cluster-wide primary storage pools, this will cause the Root volume of the 
system VM to be migrated to the appropriate datastore in the new cluster). 
Storage migration of stopped System VMs is also supported.
   ```





This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd closed issue #907: [BUG] UI Does not allow to add a zone without primary shared storage

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



rhtyd closed issue #907:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/issues/907


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-primate] rhtyd merged pull request #908: FIX - Skip add primary storage if user selected to enable local storage for user and system VMs

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



rhtyd merged pull request #908:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-primate/pull/908


   



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [cloudstack-documentation] rhtyd commented on pull request #132: cloud-init and UserData service documentation cleanup

2021-01-04 Thread GitBox



rhtyd commented on pull request #132:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/132#issuecomment-754462889


   Thanks @onitake 



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

37 matches

Mail list logo