[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Get usage records new input format start ...

[svscorp]

Github user svscorp closed the pull request at:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/191


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Get usage records new input format start ...

[svscorp]

Github user svscorp commented on the pull request:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/191#issuecomment-96160523
  
Thanks


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---

please help trying to change the ip of my secondary storage

[Prashant s]

Greetings !


i  trying to change the ip of my secondary storage  , was following these
steps

can you please advice , what im doing wrong


thanks in advance for  your help and reading !

prashant



i was following these steps

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs/blob/master/en-US/changing-secondary-storage-ip.xml



mysql> use cloud;

mysql> select id from host where type = 'SecondaryStorage';

mysql> update host_details set value = 'nfs://
192.168.160.20/export/mike-ss1'

where host_id = HOSTID and name = 'orig.url';

mysql> update host set name = 'nfs://
192.168.160.20/export/mike-ss1' where type

= 'SecondaryStorage' and id = #;

mysql> update host set url = 'nfs://
192.168.160.20/export/mike-ss1' where type

 = 'SecondaryStorage' and id = #;

mysql> update host set guid = 'nfs://
192.168.160.20/export/mike-ss1' where type

= 'SecondaryStorage' and id = #;


*But i dont see any host in cloud.host with type secondarystorage *

*can you please help*


mysql> select id,name,status,available from cloud.host where
type="SecondaryStorage";

Empty set (0.00 sec)

mysql> select type from cloud.host ;

++

| type   |

++

| Routing|

| Routing|

| Routing|

| Routing|

| SecondaryStorageVM |

| ConsoleProxy   |

| Routing|

| Routing|

| SecondaryStorageVM |

| Routing|

| Routing|

| Routing|

| SecondaryStorageVM |

| ConsoleProxy   |

| SecondaryStorageVM |

++

15 rows in set (0.00 sec)


mysql> select id,name,status,available from cloud.host where
type="SecondaryStorageVM";

++--+--+---+

| id | name | status   | available |

++--+--+---+

|  5 | s-1-VM   | Disconnected | 1 |

|  9 | s-354-VM | Disconnected | 1 |

| 13 | s-689-VM | Disconnected | 1 |

| 15 | s-768-VM | Up   | 1 |

++--+--+---+

4 rows in set (0.00 sec)


mysql> select id,name,status,available from cloud.host where
type="SecondaryStorage";

Empty set (0.00 sec)


mysql>

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #1146

[jenkins]

See 

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #219

[jenkins]

See 

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #1147

[jenkins]

See 

Re: ACS 4.6 idea Vision

[ilya]

This definitely warrants a closer look... thanks for bringing this up.

On 4/24/15 7:18 AM, Keerthiraja SJ wrote:

Hi All,

This is the email about why can we merge the cloudrouter.org in cloudstack
in the new 4.6.


I basic idea is in Advance Networking when we choose VLAN isolatation why
do we need more router.

Can we do something like same what Nuage Network Provides.

In Advance Networking configuration of Guest VLAN isolation we create many
VM it creates many routers where this should be avoided and ACS should come
up with good solution on networking part than depending on creating VLAN on
switch.

With reference to below link

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/NuageVsp+Network+Plugin

All the network isolation and routing is handled by the Nuage SDN solution.
Routing of the packets happen at hypervisor itself. Virtual Router is not
used for routing the packets thus the current issue of the Virtual Router
being the bottleneck is avoided. The Virtual Router VM is used only for
Password reset functionality. The Nuage solution also helps significantly
improve the agility and scale of a CS deployment as compared to a Virtual
Router based deployment

Why CS can have the same inbuilt features than of Nuage.

For example : We can set two routers if we need we should have options to
create backup server to redundancy.

Can we merge something with cloudrouter to make ACS better.


Thanks,
Keerthi

Live for stack :) cloudstack.