This definitely warrants a closer look... thanks for bringing this up.
On 4/24/15 7:18 AM, Keerthiraja SJ wrote:
Hi All, This is the email about why can we merge the cloudrouter.org in cloudstack in the new 4.6. I basic idea is in Advance Networking when we choose VLAN isolatation why do we need more router. Can we do something like same what Nuage Network Provides. In Advance Networking configuration of Guest VLAN isolation we create many VM it creates many routers where this should be avoided and ACS should come up with good solution on networking part than depending on creating VLAN on switch. With reference to below link https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/NuageVsp+Network+Plugin All the network isolation and routing is handled by the Nuage SDN solution. Routing of the packets happen at hypervisor itself. Virtual Router is not used for routing the packets thus the current issue of the Virtual Router being the bottleneck is avoided. The Virtual Router VM is used only for Password reset functionality. The Nuage solution also helps significantly improve the agility and scale of a CS deployment as compared to a Virtual Router based deployment Why CS can have the same inbuilt features than of Nuage. For example : We can set two routers if we need we should have options to create backup server to redundancy. Can we merge something with cloudrouter to make ACS better. Thanks, Keerthi Live for stack :) cloudstack.
