Re: [DISCUSS] Any issues to be fixed for 4.3.1?

[France]

I understand.
Thank you for your effort Rohit.
Regards,
F.

On 09 Dec 2014, at 13:39, Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi France,
> 
> I'll try too go through them and see if I can fix them, everyone in the 
> community is encouraged to help fix test.
> If they are already fixed, I can help with backporting them and testing them.
> 
> I don't want to delay 4.3.2 release further because there is a security issue 
> that will be shipped with 4.3.2 and we have not done any official ACS release 
> to answer that, I think we should fix blockers or critical bugs for 4.3.2 and 
> effort on testing it now. We'll keep working on these and other pending bugs, 
> and if they don't make it to 4.3.2 we can always work on 4.3.3 etc.
> 
> On Monday 08 December 2014 03:06 PM, France wrote:
>> Hi Rohit,
>> 
>> Here are a few issues (without resolution). Maybe you can help get a fix in 
>> time for 4.3.2 release:
>> 
>> Snapshosts errors after upgrade 4.1.1 to 4.3.1:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8013
>> 
>> Failed to create a volume from snapshot:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8014
>> 
>> Virtual Router only with DHCP should not have DNS service
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4675
>> 
>> Excessive use of LVM snapshots on XenServer, that leads to snapshot failure 
>> and unnecessary disk usage.
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6060
>> 
>> Possibly this one too:
>> Failed to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for 
>> volume 372 -> Failure from sparse_dd: Fatal error: exception 
>> Invalid_argument("index out of bounds”):
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8044?filter=-2
>> 
>> Some others, you have already back-ported. For that we thank you.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Regards,
>> F.
>> 
>> 
>> On 20 Nov 2014, at 10:15, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
>> 
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We’ve some bugfixes backported to 4.3 branch since 4.3.1 was released and 
>> > I think we should at least support this branch with a 4.3.2 release in 
>> > next couple of weeks until a stable 4.5.0 is released in next couple of 
>> > months.
>> >
>> > I’m going through JIRA and list of issues and will help backport fixes to 
>> > the 4.3 branch. So, please share if you’ve found any 
>> > blocker/critical/major issue that you found in 4.3.0 or 4.3.1 and want to 
>> > be fixed. Thanks.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Rohit Yadav
>> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>> > M. +91 88 262 30892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
>> > Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
>> >
>> > Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
>> >
>> > IaaS Cloud Design & 
>> > Build
>> > CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
>> > CloudStack Consulting
>> > CloudStack Software 
>> > Engineering
>> > CloudStack Infrastructure 
>> > Support
>> > CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
>> > Courses
>> 
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
> Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)
> 
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> 
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
> CloudStack Consulting
> CloudStack Software 
> Engineering
> CloudStack Infrastructure 
> Support
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training 
> Courses
> 
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
> its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
> believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
> incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. 
> Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
> operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
> registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
> Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Erik Weber]

On tir. 9. des. 2014 at 14.27 Rohit Yadav  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master
> is simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if
> anyone has any objections on just keeping master as the working branch
> and have branches when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
> etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to
> identify past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the
> support branches such as 5.3/5.2 etc.
>
> This way we will have:
> - one main working branch (master)
> - branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull
> requests or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
> - master is aimed to remain stable
> - master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
> - CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward
> compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades
>
> For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;
>
> +1  approve
> +0  no opinion
> -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>
>

+1, seems like the best thing to do.

-- 
Erik

Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.

[Andrija Panic]

I also examinded KVM thortling, and got 1/4 of the settings cloudstack
always starts VM with same parameters, no matter what you configure
manually on KVM/Xen..

On 10 December 2014 at 08:27, raja sekhar  wrote:

> hi prasanth,
>
> In cloudstack i have given network rate as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter qos
> properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM.
>
> Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth)
> through xencenter or commandline process in
> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html
> ,
> if i shutdown the VM from cloudstack that VM wil be disabled from
> xencenter, when ever i start the VM, the qos value will be same or it will
> changed to 25Mb/s.
>
> waiting for your reply.
>
> Regards,
> Rajasekhar.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra <
> prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > From the  xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS
> > settings) for that particular vm .
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
> >
> > Recent reply from Vadim:
> >
> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html
> >
> > On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar 
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Star,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
> > > how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command
> > > for xenserver host?
> > >
> > > waiting for your reply.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rajasekhar.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the
> > > > network rate of global configuration.
> > > > If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of
> > > > the VM and focus on   ... .
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > > Star Guo
> > > >
> > > > -邮件原件-
> > > > 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> > > > 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> > > > 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the
> > > > Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute
> > > > offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network
> > > > Throttling Rate(default 200
> > > > Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> > > >
> > > > please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Rajasekhar.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: unable to test Network Throttling.

[Jayapal Reddy Uradi]

Hi Rajashekar,

>  i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
Can you please explain what is the issue you are facing while testing.
Is it not working as the value configured ?

Network throttling is for egress traffic. In configuration it is Mbits/s
but in hypervisor it is configured as MBytes/s. 1024 Mb/s is 128MB.

Thanks,
Jayapal



On 10-Dec-2014, at 2:15 PM, Andrija Panic 
 wrote:

> I also examinded KVM thortling, and got 1/4 of the settings cloudstack
> always starts VM with same parameters, no matter what you configure
> manually on KVM/Xen..
> 
> On 10 December 2014 at 08:27, raja sekhar  wrote:
> 
>> hi prasanth,
>> 
>> In cloudstack i have given network rate as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter qos
>> properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM.
>> 
>> Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth)
>> through xencenter or commandline process in
>> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html
>> ,
>> if i shutdown the VM from cloudstack that VM wil be disabled from
>> xencenter, when ever i start the VM, the qos value will be same or it will
>> changed to 25Mb/s.
>> 
>> waiting for your reply.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Rajasekhar.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra <
>> prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> From the  xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS
>>> settings) for that particular vm .
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
>>> 
>>> Recent reply from Vadim:
>>> 
>> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces.html
>>> 
>>> On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar 
>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Star,
 
 Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
 how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command
 for xenserver host?
 
 waiting for your reply.
 
 Regards,
 Rajasekhar.
 
 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the
> network rate of global configuration.
> If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of
> the VM and focus on   ... .
> 
> Best Regards,
> Star Guo
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the
> Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute
> offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network
> Throttling Rate(default 200
> Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> 
> please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Rajasekhar.
> 
> 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Andrija Panić
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Andrija Panić

Review Request 28895: CLOUDSTACK-8057: test_dedicate_guest_vlan_range.py - Marking a test as invalid

[Gaurav Aradhye]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28895/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8057
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8057


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

The test case dedicates the vlan range to account but creates guest network in 
project, and then checks if the vlan of the network is from dedicated range.

This is an invalid scenario.

Will add new test case for dedicating vlan to project and creating guest 
networks in project after verifying manually.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_dedicate_guest_vlan_ranges.py 29bc280 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28895/diff/


Testing
---

N/A


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #771

[jenkins]

See 

Review Request 28896: test_host_high_availability.py - Adding necessary code to check the hosts in cluster and update the host with appropriate tags to make it HA enabled

[Gaurav Aradhye]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28896/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8059
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8059


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---


The test suite does not have the required code in setupClass() for the test 
cases to run properly.

Required code includes:
1) Find the cluster with at least 3 Hosts
2) Make one of the hosts HA enabled.
3) Remove the host tags in the cleanup.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/maint/test_host_high_availability.py 0d76f81 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28896/diff/


Testing
---

Yes.

Log:
Test VM deployments (Create HA enabled Compute Service Offering and VM) ... === 
TestName: test_01_vm_deployment_with_compute_offering_with_ha_enabled | Status :
SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify you can not create new VMs on hosts with an ha.tag ... === TestName: 
test_02_no_vm_creation_on_host_with_haenabled | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify you can not migrate VMs to hosts with an ha.tag (positive) ... === 
TestName: test_03_cant_migrate_vm_to_host_with_ha_positive | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Verify you can not migrate VMs to hosts with an ha.tag (negative) ... === 
TestName: test_04_cant_migrate_vm_to_host_with_ha_negative | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Verify that none of the VMs with HA enabled migrate to an ha tagged host during 
live migration ... === TestName:
test_05_no_vm_with_ha_gets_migrated_to_ha_host_in_live_migration | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify that none of the VMs without HA enabled migrate to an ha tagged host 
during live migration ... === TestName:
test_06_no_vm_without_ha_gets_migrated_to_ha_host_in_live_migration | Status : 
SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 6 tests in 935.481s

OK


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye

RE: unable to test Network Throttling.

[Prashant Kumar Mishra]

Please check this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2820
Thanks
Prashant

-Original Message-
From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:37 PM
To: 
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: unable to test Network Throttling.

Hi Rajashekar,

>  i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
Can you please explain what is the issue you are facing while testing.
Is it not working as the value configured ?

Network throttling is for egress traffic. In configuration it is Mbits/s but in 
hypervisor it is configured as MBytes/s. 1024 Mb/s is 128MB.

Thanks,
Jayapal



On 10-Dec-2014, at 2:15 PM, Andrija Panic 
 wrote:

> I also examinded KVM thortling, and got 1/4 of the settings 
> cloudstack always starts VM with same parameters, no matter what you 
> configure manually on KVM/Xen..
> 
> On 10 December 2014 at 08:27, raja sekhar  wrote:
> 
>> hi prasanth,
>> 
>> In cloudstack i have given network rate as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter 
>> qos properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM.
>> 
>> Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth) 
>> through xencenter or commandline process in 
>> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces
>> .html
>> ,
>> if i shutdown the VM from cloudstack that VM wil be disabled from 
>> xencenter, when ever i start the VM, the qos value will be same or it 
>> will changed to 25Mb/s.
>> 
>> waiting for your reply.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Rajasekhar.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra < 
>> prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> From the  xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS
>>> settings) for that particular vm .
>>> 
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
>>> 
>>> Recent reply from Vadim:
>>> 
>> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces
>> .html
>>> 
>>> On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar 
>> wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Star,
 
 Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
 how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command 
 for xenserver host?
 
 waiting for your reply.
 
 Regards,
 Rajasekhar.
 
 On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the 
> network rate of global configuration.
> If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of 
> the VM and focus on   ... .
> 
> Best Regards,
> Star Guo
> 
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the 
> Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute 
> offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network 
> Throttling Rate(default 200
> Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> 
> please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Rajasekhar.
> 
> 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> Andrija Panić
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Andrija Panić

Re: [QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

[Gaurav Aradhye]

Thanks Mike for details reply!

I checked on VMware and KVM. On KVM, after first snapshot, the secondary
storage count for account increases by 1 (template + snapshot I suppose).
After second snapshot, it again increases by 1.

On VmWare, the secondary storage count remains the same irrespective of how
many snapshots I create.

This is clearly an issue.

I have two questions.

1) How can we know the snapshot size? The size is not listed in any API.
2) Is snapshot size counted in secondary storage count (and hence
considered in SS limits)? I just want to be sure here.

Regards,
Gaurav

On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> I guess I would expect the non-zero blocks of your disk to be backed up the
> first time, which could lead to anywhere from some small amount of space
> all the way up to 8 GB (in your situation).
>
> However, you mentioned that you see 9 GB consumed, which does seem
> unexpected.
>
> When you say your template is 8 GB, I assume that's its physical size (and
> the root disk's virtual size could be larger).
>
> If that's the case, I would expect 8 GB to be backed up for the first
> snapshot.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Gaurav Aradhye <
> gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mike!
> >
> > However, I am observing this in case of first snapshot also. Let me try
> on
> > various hypervisors to see the behavior.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gaurav
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not exactly sure how this number is calculated, but - if you are
> > using
> > > XenServer - remember that after the first snapshot for a volume, each
> > > subsequent snapshot is only the blocks that have changed since the
> prior
> > > snapshot (this might even be true for ESX these days with CloudStack).
> > >
> > > That being the case, unless you change all 8 GB of blocks each time
> > before
> > > doing a snapshot, you should expect your snapshots to be < 8 GB
> > > (potentially very small, if you didn't change much since the last
> > > snapshot).
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Gaurav Aradhye <
> > > gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > When I create a snapshot, from say, template registered through an
> > > account,
> > > > then
> > > >
> > > > 1) How can I know the snapshot size on secondary storage? (API
> > > > listSnapshots does not specify the snapshot size)
> > > >
> > > > 2) How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage used by the
> > account?
> > > > Currently I can see secondary storage count increasing by the (number
> > of
> > > > snapshots) and not the snapshot size.
> > > >
> > > > E.g. I have template sized 8 GB. I create a snapshot from it. Now if
> I
> > > list
> > > > the secondary storage used by the account, then it lists as "9" (GB).
> > If
> > > I
> > > > create another snapshot, then it lists it as 10. It is not possible
> for
> > > my
> > > > snapshot size to be 1 (GB) because it's created from root volume
> having
> > > > size 8 GB.
> > > >
> > > > Can I say it's a bug? Secondary storage count being listed as
> (Storage
> > > > other than snapshot + number of snapshots) GB.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Gaurav
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > *™*
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> *™*
>

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun-4.3 #4

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6075: Increase the ram size for router service offering

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7966:

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7917: Validating Load Balancer Rule when updating LB + 
unit test

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7915: Remove hard-coded values for Load Balancer 
algorithms in UI

[Rohit Yadav] appliance: zip systemvm template for hyperv

[Rohit Yadav] appliance: move built zip files to dist/

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7951

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7951: Limit amount of memory used by cloudstack-agent 
jsvc

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7886: cloudstackoperations like deployvm,deleteNW are 
failing if CS fail to contact rabbit mq server. This is happening in case of 
Async API calls.

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7884: Cloudstack MS is not responding (happening 
randomly) after some restart.

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7877: The NET.IPRELEASE events are not added to 
usage_event on IP range deletion from Physical Networks.

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7872: network getting shutdown inspite of running VM's 
in the network

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7869: Add simulator support for findHostsForMigration 
API

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7849: Sorting projects alphabetically in drop down menu

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7837: [UI] Make the Source CIDR column wide enough to 
fit the CIDR value without ellipsizing

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7766: Field Validations Missing for Ingress and Egress 
Rules

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7700: Volume Snapshot Async Job returns Success for a 
failed

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7679: Bump rabbitmq client library to latest 3.4.1

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7589: VM not Starting and always stuck in Stopped 
state after

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7581: Empty 'ID' parameters allowed in API calls

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7463: UI: Domain Admin UI shows 'Add LDAP Users' 
button (should not be shown)

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7319: dd with direct io is less impacting on Dom0 
kernel resources

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7302: UI: Remove Hover Interaction from breadcrumbs at 
top page

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7293: UI: Fixed localization issues on the login page

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7191:On restartNetwork destroy the VR immediatley, 
instead of

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7144: No GSLB provider is available during assigning 
load

[Rohit Yadav] CHANGES: update list of backported bugfixes

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-7129: Non-admin user can use deleteNetwork with shared

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6996 Adding cluster to legacy zone failed

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6989: Add 3 strikes rule for RvR freezing detection

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6908: Enable IPv6 in sysctl when only necessary

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6869: SSH Public key content is overridden by 
template's meta data when you create a instance

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6783: Return a proper LibvirtStoragePool object after 
creating the pool

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6714: monitor script echo service command is added 
with quotes

[Rohit Yadav] add conntrackd logrotate for systemvms, dont start conntrackd on 
logrotate if it isnt running

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6578: Fixed issue in delete remote access vpn command

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6577: Disable service monitoring in RVR

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6516: In 4.3, SSL was turned off by default.

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6467: Add pre/post-state transition status to messages 
published on

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-5907, CLOUDSTACK-6396: KVM/RBD & KVM/CLVM volumes 
mistakenly shown as OVM, disables snapshotting

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6376: Return empty list when network tier has no ACL 
list associated.

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6374: Remove entries from lb vm map when lb rule apply 
fails

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6365: support virtual host and ssl in rabbitMQ event 
bus

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6328: run.sh check if an existing java process is 
running, before spawining new ones

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6328: added license header and removed white space

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6322 - Don't allow service instance creation with 
empty or null service-instance "name".

[Rohit Yadav] CHANGES: updates changes files, fix cherry-picked commits that 
break semantics

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6269: [Simulator] Exception "Unable to send command"

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6236:Negative ref_cnt of 
template(snapshot/volume)_store_ref results in out-of-range error in Mysql

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6236:fix a copy-and-paste error for decrRefCnt in

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6210: LDAP:listLdapUsers api throws exception when we 
click on "Add LDAP Account" This occurs when ldap basedn is not configured. 
Throwing an IAE and a proper message is returned from the api call

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6192: Return failure on StartCommand and 
PrepareForMigrationCommand

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-6172: Volume is not retaining same uuid when migrating 
from one storage to another.

[Rohit Yadav] CLOUDSTACK-

Re: unable to test Network Throttling.

[Andrija Panic]

Jayapal, you are saying that network trrottling rate is NOT for ingress
traffic ? I'm not sure of this...?

On 10 December 2014 at 12:00, Prashant Kumar Mishra <
prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Please check this https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2820
> Thanks
> Prashant
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jayapal Reddy Uradi [mailto:jayapalreddy.ur...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:37 PM
> To: 
> Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: unable to test Network Throttling.
>
> Hi Rajashekar,
>
> >  i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> Can you please explain what is the issue you are facing while testing.
> Is it not working as the value configured ?
>
> Network throttling is for egress traffic. In configuration it is Mbits/s
> but in hypervisor it is configured as MBytes/s. 1024 Mb/s is 128MB.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>
>
> On 10-Dec-2014, at 2:15 PM, Andrija Panic 
>  wrote:
>
> > I also examinded KVM thortling, and got 1/4 of the settings
> > cloudstack always starts VM with same parameters, no matter what you
> > configure manually on KVM/Xen..
> >
> > On 10 December 2014 at 08:27, raja sekhar 
> wrote:
> >
> >> hi prasanth,
> >>
> >> In cloudstack i have given network rate as 1024Mb/s but in xencenter
> >> qos properties it is showing 25Mb/s for that VM.
> >>
> >> Andrija Panic/Prashant if i change the interface property(bandwidth)
> >> through xencenter or commandline process in
> >> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces
> >> .html
> >> ,
> >> if i shutdown the VM from cloudstack that VM wil be disabled from
> >> xencenter, when ever i start the VM, the qos value will be same or it
> >> will changed to 25Mb/s.
> >>
> >> waiting for your reply.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Rajasekhar.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Prashant Kumar Mishra <
> >> prashantkumar.mis...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From the  xencenter you can check interface property (look for QoS
> >>> settings) for that particular vm .
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>> From: Andrija Panic [mailto:andrija.pa...@gmail.com]
> >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 1:30 PM
> >>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: 答复: unable to test Network Throttling.
> >>>
> >>> Recent reply from Vadim:
> >>>
> >> http://xmodulo.com/how-to-rate-limit-xenserver-vms-network-interfaces
> >> .html
> >>>
> >>> On 9 December 2014 at 08:40, raja sekhar 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
>  Hi Star,
> 
>  Thanks for your reply. I'm using XenServer 6.2 and cloudstack 4.3.1.
>  how can i check the band width rate of the VM, is there any command
>  for xenserver host?
> 
>  waiting for your reply.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Rajasekhar.
> 
>  On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:56 PM, Star Guo  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is a priority: the network rate of compute offering > the
> > network rate of global configuration.
> > If you deploy on kvm host, you can use virsh command to dumpxml of
> > the VM and focus on   ... .
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Star Guo
> >
> > -邮件原件-
> > 发件人: raja sekhar [mailto:rajsekhar@gmail.com]
> > 发送时间: 2014年12月9日 14:28
> > 收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> > 主题: unable to test Network Throttling.
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > i have created one compute offering(2 CPU , 4 GB) and given the
> > Network Rate as 1024 Mb/s, a VM is deployed from that compute
> > offering and in global settings i didn't changed any Network
> > Throttling Rate(default 200
> > Mb/s) and i'm unable to test the network bandwidth rate.
> >
> > please suggest me how to test the bandwidth rate of the VM.
> >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rajasekhar.
> >
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> Andrija Panić
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
>
>


-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: Port forwarding (web) - doesnt show real client IP

[Andrija Panic]

Marcus, for outbound I meant Source NAT, sorry... Will check other Static
NAT (all port forwarding) and will also test sinle port forwarding stuff on
4.4 or possibly 4.5. I see this as a serious issue for any VDC user... so
will check...

On 9 December 2014 at 17:34, Marcus  wrote:

> Yeah, that seems strange. I don't recall it working that way in the past.
> It uses the standard iptables DNAT, and I believe the same methods as
> static NAT to rewrite the destination ip. Do you see the same behavior with
> static NAT on routing incoming traffic to a particular VM?
>
> Just to make sure we're not confusing terms here, static NAT is a port
> forward for all ports, basically mapping IP2 in whole to an instance.  I
> think you're referring to SNAT (source NAT) when you say outbound static
> NAT looks fine, but I'm not sure.
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Andrija Panic 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Marcus,
> > static NAT (outound connections) works fine - when internal VM access
> > internet, it's source address is replaced with the MAIN public IP of the
> > VPC VR (call it IP1 in my example - x.x.x.x) - so all fine.
> >
> > Then I have additional public IPs to be able to do port forwarding... -
> > when I do port forwarding on IP2 x.x.x.y (additional public IP on VR) to
> > the internal IP on VM - the VR actually does some kind of proxying so to
> > speak - so the source IP in the TCP/UDP packet that reach internal VM IP,
> > appears to be the  IP1 x.x.x.x (main public IP of the VR)​ instead the
> real
> > remote IP of the client...
> >
> > Will check the scripts - but this is serious issue in my opinion. I
> > understand proxying (haproxy) works like every proxy - so the behaviour
> for
> > the proxy is expected. But this behaviour for the port forwarding is NOT
> > normal at all...
> >
> > THanks
> >
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Re: Review Request 28895: CLOUDSTACK-8057: test_dedicate_guest_vlan_range.py - Marking a test as invalid

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28895/#review64537
---

Ship it!


pushed to 4.5 and master

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 10, 2014, 9:47 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28895/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 10, 2014, 9:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8057
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8057
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> The test case dedicates the vlan range to account but creates guest network 
> in project, and then checks if the vlan of the network is from dedicated 
> range.
> 
> This is an invalid scenario.
> 
> Will add new test case for dedicating vlan to project and creating guest 
> networks in project after verifying manually.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/component/test_dedicate_guest_vlan_ranges.py 29bc280 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28895/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> N/A
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Re: Review Request 28896: test_host_high_availability.py - Adding necessary code to check the hosts in cluster and update the host with appropriate tags to make it HA enabled

[SrikanteswaraRao Talluri]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28896/#review64538
---

Ship it!


pushed to 4.5 and master

- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri


On Dec. 10, 2014, 10:51 a.m., Gaurav Aradhye wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/28896/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Dec. 10, 2014, 10:51 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8059
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8059
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> 
> The test suite does not have the required code in setupClass() for the test 
> cases to run properly.
> 
> Required code includes:
> 1) Find the cluster with at least 3 Hosts
> 2) Make one of the hosts HA enabled.
> 3) Remove the host tags in the cleanup.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   test/integration/component/maint/test_host_high_availability.py 0d76f81 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28896/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Yes.
> 
> Log:
> Test VM deployments (Create HA enabled Compute Service Offering and VM) ... 
> === TestName: test_01_vm_deployment_with_compute_offering_with_ha_enabled | 
> Status :
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Verify you can not create new VMs on hosts with an ha.tag ... === TestName: 
> test_02_no_vm_creation_on_host_with_haenabled | Status : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Verify you can not migrate VMs to hosts with an ha.tag (positive) ... === 
> TestName: test_03_cant_migrate_vm_to_host_with_ha_positive | Status : SUCCESS 
> ===
> ok
> Verify you can not migrate VMs to hosts with an ha.tag (negative) ... === 
> TestName: test_04_cant_migrate_vm_to_host_with_ha_negative | Status : SUCCESS 
> ===
> ok
> Verify that none of the VMs with HA enabled migrate to an ha tagged host 
> during live migration ... === TestName:
> test_05_no_vm_with_ha_gets_migrated_to_ha_host_in_live_migration | Status : 
> SUCCESS ===
> ok
> Verify that none of the VMs without HA enabled migrate to an ha tagged host 
> during live migration ... === TestName:
> test_06_no_vm_without_ha_gets_migrated_to_ha_host_in_live_migration | Status 
> : SUCCESS ===
> ok
> 
> --
> Ran 6 tests in 935.481s
> 
> OK
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gaurav Aradhye
> 
>

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-4.5-simulator #112

[jenkins]

See 

Jenkins build is unstable: simulator-singlerun #773

[jenkins]

See 

Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-4.3-maven-build-noredist #513

[jenkins]

See 


--
Started by upstream project "cloudstack-4.3-maven-build" build number 674
originally caused by:
 Started by an SCM change
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remotely on cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-730 
(cloudstack-buildslave-centos6) in workspace 

 > /usr/bin/git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree # timeout=400
Fetching changes from the remote Git repository
 > /usr/bin/git config remote.origin.url git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git # 
 > timeout=400
Fetching upstream changes from git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git
 > /usr/bin/git --version # timeout=400
 > /usr/bin/git fetch --tags --progress git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git 
 > +refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*
FATAL: Failed to fetch from git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git
hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Failed to fetch from 
git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:647)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.retrieveChanges(GitSCM.java:889)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.checkout(GitSCM.java:914)
at hudson.model.AbstractProject.checkout(AbstractProject.java:1258)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.defaultCheckout(AbstractBuild.java:622)
at jenkins.scm.SCMCheckoutStrategy.checkout(SCMCheckoutStrategy.java:86)
at 
hudson.model.AbstractBuild$AbstractBuildExecution.run(AbstractBuild.java:528)
at hudson.model.Run.execute(Run.java:1759)
at hudson.model.FreeStyleBuild.run(FreeStyleBuild.java:43)
at hudson.model.ResourceController.execute(ResourceController.java:89)
at hudson.model.Executor.run(Executor.java:240)
Caused by: hudson.plugins.git.GitException: Command "/usr/bin/git fetch --tags 
--progress git://git.apache.org/cloudstack.git 
+refs/heads/*:refs/remotes/origin/*" returned status code 128:
stdout: 
stderr: fatal: read error: Connection reset by peer

at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandIn(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1435)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.launchCommandWithCredentials(CliGitAPIImpl.java:1223)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl.access$300(CliGitAPIImpl.java:85)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.CliGitAPIImpl$1.execute(CliGitAPIImpl.java:280)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:153)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler$1.call(RemoteGitImpl.java:146)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:121)
at hudson.remoting.UserRequest.perform(UserRequest.java:49)
at hudson.remoting.Request$2.run(Request.java:324)
at 
hudson.remoting.InterceptingExecutorService$1.call(InterceptingExecutorService.java:68)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1146)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:701)
at ..remote call to cloudstack-buildslave-centos6-730(Native Method)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.attachCallSiteStackTrace(Channel.java:1356)
at hudson.remoting.UserResponse.retrieve(UserRequest.java:221)
at hudson.remoting.Channel.call(Channel.java:752)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.execute(RemoteGitImpl.java:146)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor296.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at 
org.jenkinsci.plugins.gitclient.RemoteGitImpl$CommandInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteGitImpl.java:132)
at sun.proxy.$Proxy112.execute(Unknown Source)
at hudson.plugins.git.GitSCM.fetchFrom(GitSCM.java:645)
... 10 more

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #774

[jenkins]

See 

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-4.5-singlerun #91

[jenkins]

See 

RE: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

[Suresh Sadhu]

+1

-Original Message-
From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org] 
Sent: 10 December 2014 06:20
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Simplify CloudMonkey's branching/maintenance process

+1


On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 18:55 PM, Rohit Yadav 
wrote:

Hi,

CloudMonkey's git repo history is mostly linear and the work on master is 
simply getting synced on 5.3 branch. I want to ask the community if anyone has 
any objections on just keeping master as the working branch and have branches 
when they are needed (say documentation, feature work
etc) and once they are merged they can be removed. We have git tags to identify 
past release so is it also alright with everyone to remove the support branches 
such as 5.3/5.2 etc.

This way we will have:
- one main working branch (master)
- branch based workflow: feature branches for doing feature work, pull requests 
or reviewboard for bugfixes for non-committers
- master is aimed to remain stable
- master will have its own TravisCI and tests (in upcoming weeks)
- CloudMonkey aims for progressive/rolling releases that are backward 
compatible with older releases and have clean upgrades

For this please vote with your comments/suggestions;

+1  approve
+0  no opinion
-1  disapprove (and reason why)

Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab PS. If you see any footer below, I did 
not add it :) Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related 
services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company 
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from 
Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.



--
Sent from Windows Phone

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

The meeting is on ...

> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:56 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Steve Wilson
> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> 
> Yes I am planning to record the GTM
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:59 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> >
> > Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others
> > can view it if they are not able to attend (or only become interested
> > after the first couple meetings and wants to catch up)?
> >
> > Will
> > On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
> > 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix.
> > >
> > > Here are the details.
> > >
> > > 1.  Please join my meeting.
> > > https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368
> > >
> > > 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
> > > Or, call in using your telephone.
> > >
> > > United States: +1 (213) 493-0008
> > > Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800
> > > 191 358
> > > Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
> > > Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
> > > Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
> > > Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305
> > > Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800
> > > 81388
> > > Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
> > > Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909
> > > Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777
> > > 3281
> > > Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
> > > Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146
> > > China (toll-free): 4008 866154
> > > Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free):
> > > 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
> > > Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
> > > Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
> > > Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
> > > France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
> > > France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
> > > Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
> > > Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
> > > Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free): 30774812
> > > Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free): 800 9993
> > > India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia (toll-free): 001 803
> > > 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818
> > > 263
> > > Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
> > > Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020
> > > Italy (toll-free): 800 792289
> > > Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
> > > Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200
> > > Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free):
> > > 800
> > > 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01 800
> > > 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
> > > Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759
> > > New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974
> > > 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
> > > Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
> > > Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253
> > > Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00 800
> > > 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0 800
> > > 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi Arabia
> > > (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000 South
> > > Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900 593
> > > Spain: +34 931 76 1534
> > > Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545
> > > Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691
> > > Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452
> > > Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89
> > > Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846
> > > Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800
> > > 4488
> > > 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates
> > > (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168
> > > 0209 United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free):
> > > 1 877
> > > 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free): 120
> > > 32 148
> > >
> > > Access Code: 285-394-368
> > > Audio PIN: Shown after joining the meeting
> > >
> > > Meeting ID: 285-394-368
> > >
> > > GoToMeeting®
> > > Online Meetings Made Easy®
> > >
> > > Not at your computer? Click the link to join this meeting from your
> > > iPhone®, iPad® or Android® device via the GoToMeeting app.
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 11:16 AM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > > Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> > > >
> > > > Based on Doodle. Meeting  is schedule for  Dec 10th, 17h00 UTC.
> > > freenode:
> > > > #cloudstack-meeting unless someone have a GTM.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Daan Hoogland
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > When do we call the result of the doodle? wait for wednesday?
> > >

[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.4.2

[Daan Hoogland]

This was stuck in my drafts, I had not send it due to the ldap issue
that was not yet announced and then forgot. Sorry for that.

Hi all,

After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.4.2 *passes* with
3 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.

+1 (PMC / binding)
3 person

+1 (non binding)
1 person

0
1 person

-1
none

Thanks to everyone participating.

I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
to give the mirrors time to catch up.



-- 
Daan

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

Folks

We had good initial session this morning and we have started a public wiki [1] 
to allow us to collaborate. It is a scratch pad for start and we all will 
refine it as we go along. The link to recording and the chat log from today's 
meeting are also referenced in the wiki. 

[1] 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Quality+and+Process+Improvement+Initiative


> -Original Message-
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:05 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Steve Wilson
> Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> 
> The meeting is on ...
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:56 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> >
> > Yes I am planning to record the GTM
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:59 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> > >
> > > Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others
> > > can view it if they are not able to attend (or only become
> > > interested after the first couple meetings and wants to catch up)?
> > >
> > > Will
> > > On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix.
> > > >
> > > > Here are the details.
> > > >
> > > > 1.  Please join my meeting.
> > > > https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368
> > > >
> > > > 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is recommended.
> > > > Or, call in using your telephone.
> > > >
> > > > United States: +1 (213) 493-0008
> > > > Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800
> > > > 191 358
> > > > Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
> > > > Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
> > > > Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
> > > > Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305
> > > > Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800
> > > > 81388
> > > > Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
> > > > Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909 Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120
> > > > 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777
> > > > 3281
> > > > Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
> > > > Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146
> > > > China (toll-free): 4008 866154
> > > > Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free):
> > > > 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
> > > > Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
> > > > Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
> > > > Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
> > > > France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
> > > > France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
> > > > Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
> > > > Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
> > > > Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free):
> > > > 30774812 Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free):
> > > > 800 9993 India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia
> > > > (toll-free): 001 803
> > > > 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818
> > > > 263
> > > > Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
> > > > Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020
> > > > Italy (toll-free): 800 792289
> > > > Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
> > > > Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200
> > > > Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free):
> > > > 800
> > > > 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01
> > > > 800
> > > > 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
> > > > Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759
> > > > New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974
> > > > 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
> > > > Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
> > > > Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253
> > > > Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00
> > > > 800
> > > > 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0
> > > > 800
> > > > 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi
> > > > Arabia
> > > > (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000
> > > > South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900
> > > > 593
> > > > Spain: +34 931 76 1534
> > > > Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545
> > > > Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691
> > > > Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452
> > > > Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89
> > > > Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846
> > > > Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Turkey (toll-free): 00 800
> > > > 4488
> > > > 29001 Ukraine (toll-free): 0 800 50 4691 United Arab Emirates
> > > > (toll-free): 800 044 40444 United Kingdom (toll-free): 0 808 168
> > > > 0209 United Kingdom: +44 (0) 20 7151 1817 United States (toll-free):
> > > > 1 877
> > > > 309 2070 Uruguay (toll-free): 000 405 4459 Viet Nam (toll-free):
> > > > 120
> > > > 32 148
> > > >
> > > > Access Code: 285-394-368
> > > > Audio PIN: Shown afte

Ubuntu 14.04 support on host servers

[Andrei Mikhailovsky]

Hello guys, 

Does anyone know if ubuntu server 14.04 on host servers is currently supported 
in acs 4.4 branch? I've seen some issues with getting the usage stats for acs 
4.2.1 ,so wondering if the latest acs is ready for the latest ubuntu server lts 
as a host server? 

Cheers 

Andrei 

CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[ilya musayev]

CloudStack/CloudPlatform 4.3 defaults to LSI Logic Parallel and we need 
to use LSI Logic SAS when windows VMs are created.


Would anyone know if there is a way to override the controller through 
vm_details table and preset the controller to use there?


Right now it takes the options of scsi and ide, i've tried changing it 
to osdefault (which should have addressed the issue, but it appears we 
are still defaulting to LSI Logic Parallel)


osdefault for Windows 2008 R2 ESXi 5.1+ should be set to LSI Logic Parallel

Any help is appreciated,

Thanks
ilya

RE: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[Somesh Naidu]

Try registering the template as Windows Server 2008 (without the R2) instead 
and see if that fixes it.

-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Marcus
Subject: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

CloudStack/CloudPlatform 4.3 defaults to LSI Logic Parallel and we need 
to use LSI Logic SAS when windows VMs are created.

Would anyone know if there is a way to override the controller through 
vm_details table and preset the controller to use there?

Right now it takes the options of scsi and ide, i've tried changing it 
to osdefault (which should have addressed the issue, but it appears we 
are still defaulting to LSI Logic Parallel)

osdefault for Windows 2008 R2 ESXi 5.1+ should be set to LSI Logic Parallel

Any help is appreciated,

Thanks
ilya

Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[Erik Weber]

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:44 PM, ilya musayev  wrote:

> CloudStack/CloudPlatform 4.3 defaults to LSI Logic Parallel and we need to
> use LSI Logic SAS when windows VMs are created.
>
> Would anyone know if there is a way to override the controller through
> vm_details table and preset the controller to use there?
>
> Right now it takes the options of scsi and ide, i've tried changing it to
> osdefault (which should have addressed the issue, but it appears we are
> still defaulting to LSI Logic Parallel)
>
> osdefault for Windows 2008 R2 ESXi 5.1+ should be set to LSI Logic Parallel
>
>
Been a known problem for a long time, only known workaround that I know of
is to change the controller in the code but that would change it for all
your vms.

See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Granular+SCSI+Controller+support+in+CloudStack+over+VMware+deployments
and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787

-- 
Erik

Re: [QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

[Mike Tutkowski]

Hi everyone,

Can anyone answer these questions Gaurav has about secondary storage?

Marcus - Perhaps you know for KVM?

Kelven - Perhaps you know for VMware?

Thanks!
Mike

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Gaurav Aradhye 
wrote:

> Thanks Mike for details reply!
>
> I checked on VMware and KVM. On KVM, after first snapshot, the secondary
> storage count for account increases by 1 (template + snapshot I suppose).
> After second snapshot, it again increases by 1.
>
> On VmWare, the secondary storage count remains the same irrespective of how
> many snapshots I create.
>
> This is clearly an issue.
>
> I have two questions.
>
> 1) How can we know the snapshot size? The size is not listed in any API.
> 2) Is snapshot size counted in secondary storage count (and hence
> considered in SS limits)? I just want to be sure here.
>
> Regards,
> Gaurav
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>
> > I guess I would expect the non-zero blocks of your disk to be backed up
> the
> > first time, which could lead to anywhere from some small amount of space
> > all the way up to 8 GB (in your situation).
> >
> > However, you mentioned that you see 9 GB consumed, which does seem
> > unexpected.
> >
> > When you say your template is 8 GB, I assume that's its physical size
> (and
> > the root disk's virtual size could be larger).
> >
> > If that's the case, I would expect 8 GB to be backed up for the first
> > snapshot.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Gaurav Aradhye <
> > gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Mike!
> > >
> > > However, I am observing this in case of first snapshot also. Let me try
> > on
> > > various hypervisors to see the behavior.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Gaurav
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not exactly sure how this number is calculated, but - if you are
> > > using
> > > > XenServer - remember that after the first snapshot for a volume, each
> > > > subsequent snapshot is only the blocks that have changed since the
> > prior
> > > > snapshot (this might even be true for ESX these days with
> CloudStack).
> > > >
> > > > That being the case, unless you change all 8 GB of blocks each time
> > > before
> > > > doing a snapshot, you should expect your snapshots to be < 8 GB
> > > > (potentially very small, if you didn't change much since the last
> > > > snapshot).
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Gaurav Aradhye <
> > > > gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > When I create a snapshot, from say, template registered through an
> > > > account,
> > > > > then
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) How can I know the snapshot size on secondary storage? (API
> > > > > listSnapshots does not specify the snapshot size)
> > > > >
> > > > > 2) How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage used by the
> > > account?
> > > > > Currently I can see secondary storage count increasing by the
> (number
> > > of
> > > > > snapshots) and not the snapshot size.
> > > > >
> > > > > E.g. I have template sized 8 GB. I create a snapshot from it. Now
> if
> > I
> > > > list
> > > > > the secondary storage used by the account, then it lists as "9"
> (GB).
> > > If
> > > > I
> > > > > create another snapshot, then it lists it as 10. It is not possible
> > for
> > > > my
> > > > > snapshot size to be 1 (GB) because it's created from root volume
> > having
> > > > > size 8 GB.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can I say it's a bug? Secondary storage count being listed as
> > (Storage
> > > > > other than snapshot + number of snapshots) GB.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Gaurav
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > > > *™*
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> > *™*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
*™*

Re: [QUESTION] How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage?

[Mike Tutkowski]

Including Kelven directly on this using a different e-mail address (first
e-mail address bounced).

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Can anyone answer these questions Gaurav has about secondary storage?
>
> Marcus - Perhaps you know for KVM?
>
> Kelven - Perhaps you know for VMware?
>
> Thanks!
> Mike
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Gaurav Aradhye <
> gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mike for details reply!
>>
>> I checked on VMware and KVM. On KVM, after first snapshot, the secondary
>> storage count for account increases by 1 (template + snapshot I suppose).
>> After second snapshot, it again increases by 1.
>>
>> On VmWare, the secondary storage count remains the same irrespective of
>> how
>> many snapshots I create.
>>
>> This is clearly an issue.
>>
>> I have two questions.
>>
>> 1) How can we know the snapshot size? The size is not listed in any API.
>> 2) Is snapshot size counted in secondary storage count (and hence
>> considered in SS limits)? I just want to be sure here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gaurav
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I guess I would expect the non-zero blocks of your disk to be backed up
>> the
>> > first time, which could lead to anywhere from some small amount of space
>> > all the way up to 8 GB (in your situation).
>> >
>> > However, you mentioned that you see 9 GB consumed, which does seem
>> > unexpected.
>> >
>> > When you say your template is 8 GB, I assume that's its physical size
>> (and
>> > the root disk's virtual size could be larger).
>> >
>> > If that's the case, I would expect 8 GB to be backed up for the first
>> > snapshot.
>> >
>> > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Gaurav Aradhye <
>> > gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Mike!
>> > >
>> > > However, I am observing this in case of first snapshot also. Let me
>> try
>> > on
>> > > various hypervisors to see the behavior.
>> > >
>> > > Regards,
>> > > Gaurav
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
>> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I'm not exactly sure how this number is calculated, but - if you are
>> > > using
>> > > > XenServer - remember that after the first snapshot for a volume,
>> each
>> > > > subsequent snapshot is only the blocks that have changed since the
>> > prior
>> > > > snapshot (this might even be true for ESX these days with
>> CloudStack).
>> > > >
>> > > > That being the case, unless you change all 8 GB of blocks each time
>> > > before
>> > > > doing a snapshot, you should expect your snapshots to be < 8 GB
>> > > > (potentially very small, if you didn't change much since the last
>> > > > snapshot).
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:15 PM, Gaurav Aradhye <
>> > > > gaurav.arad...@clogeny.com>
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > When I create a snapshot, from say, template registered through an
>> > > > account,
>> > > > > then
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 1) How can I know the snapshot size on secondary storage? (API
>> > > > > listSnapshots does not specify the snapshot size)
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2) How is snapshot size counted in secondary storage used by the
>> > > account?
>> > > > > Currently I can see secondary storage count increasing by the
>> (number
>> > > of
>> > > > > snapshots) and not the snapshot size.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > E.g. I have template sized 8 GB. I create a snapshot from it. Now
>> if
>> > I
>> > > > list
>> > > > > the secondary storage used by the account, then it lists as "9"
>> (GB).
>> > > If
>> > > > I
>> > > > > create another snapshot, then it lists it as 10. It is not
>> possible
>> > for
>> > > > my
>> > > > > snapshot size to be 1 (GB) because it's created from root volume
>> > having
>> > > > > size 8 GB.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Can I say it's a bug? Secondary storage count being listed as
>> > (Storage
>> > > > > other than snapshot + number of snapshots) GB.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > Gaurav
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> > > > o: 303.746.7302
>> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> > > > *™*
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Mike Tutkowski*
>> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> > o: 303.746.7302
>> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
>> > *™*
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the cloud
> *™*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*

Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[ilya musayev]

Erik

Would you know where in the code? Looked around, could not find the place.

Thanks
ilya
On 12/10/14, 2:13 PM, Erik Weber wrote:

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 10:44 PM, ilya musayev 
wrote:
CloudStack/CloudPlatform 4.3 defaults to LSI Logic Parallel and we need to
use LSI Logic SAS when windows VMs are created.

Would anyone know if there is a way to override the controller through
vm_details table and preset the controller to use there?

Right now it takes the options of scsi and ide, i've tried changing it to
osdefault (which should have addressed the issue, but it appears we are
still defaulting to LSI Logic Parallel)

osdefault for Windows 2008 R2 ESXi 5.1+ should be set to LSI Logic Parallel



Been a known problem for a long time, only known workaround that I know of
is to change the controller in the code but that would change it for all
your vms.

See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Granular+SCSI+Controller+support+in+CloudStack+over+VMware+deployments
and
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4787

Pierre-Luc Dion as Jenkins Admin

[Will Stevens]

I would like propose that we give Pierre-Luc Dion an Admin account on
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/.  He manages all of our Jenkins servers
here at CloudOps and has Jenkins slaves ready to be added to the
buildacloud pool.

He has provided credentials and an endpoint for our machines to be added to
the pool, but they have not yet been added.

The system vms have not built in over a week because the 'systemvmbuilder'
is offline.  There are changes to the currently broken system vms (in 4.5)
which we would like to test to verify resolution, but we are currently
blocked.

He is very active in the community and is very knowledgeable in this space
so I think he would be a valuable asset to help manage this infra.

Cheers,

*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer

*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_

Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[Erik Weber]

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, ilya musayev  wrote:

> Erik
>
> Would you know where in the code? Looked around, could not find the place.
>
>
In 4.2, which was the last version we used with VMware, it was in
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java

However, it seems to have been refactored and I can't see it with the bare
eye at the moment for newer versions.

-- 
Erik

Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[Marcus]

So just for clarification, we're saying if a VM is a windows VM, and on
VMware, you cannot attach disks, correct?

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Erik Weber  wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, ilya musayev <
> ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Erik
> >
> > Would you know where in the code? Looked around, could not find the
> place.
> >
> >
> In 4.2, which was the last version we used with VMware, it was in
>
> plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java
>
> However, it seems to have been refactored and I can't see it with the bare
> eye at the moment for newer versions.
>
> --
> Erik
>

Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[Erik Weber]

Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 8.1 (and possibly Windows 2008 R2) won't have
the disk controller, and thus won't boot or otherwise be able to access the
disk(s).

Ref:
http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2059549

-- 
Erik

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Marcus  wrote:

> So just for clarification, we're saying if a VM is a windows VM, and on
> VMware, you cannot attach disks, correct?
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Erik Weber  wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, ilya musayev <
> > ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Erik
> > >
> > > Would you know where in the code? Looked around, could not find the
> > place.
> > >
> > >
> > In 4.2, which was the last version we used with VMware, it was in
> >
> >
> plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java
> >
> > However, it seems to have been refactored and I can't see it with the
> bare
> > eye at the moment for newer versions.
> >
> > --
> > Erik
> >
>

Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[Erik Weber]

Sateesh had a session about it during CCCEU, he might be able to update the
dev list about his work.

http://sched.co/X3guL1

-- 
Erik

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:58 PM, Erik Weber  wrote:

> Windows 2012 R2 and Windows 8.1 (and possibly Windows 2008 R2) won't have
> the disk controller, and thus won't boot or otherwise be able to access the
> disk(s).
>
> Ref:
> http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2059549
>
> --
> Erik
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Marcus  wrote:
>
>> So just for clarification, we're saying if a VM is a windows VM, and on
>> VMware, you cannot attach disks, correct?
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Erik Weber  wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, ilya musayev <
>> > ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Erik
>> > >
>> > > Would you know where in the code? Looked around, could not find the
>> > place.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > In 4.2, which was the last version we used with VMware, it was in
>> >
>> >
>> plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java
>> >
>> > However, it seems to have been refactored and I can't see it with the
>> bare
>> > eye at the moment for newer versions.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Erik
>> >
>>
>
>

RE: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[Somesh Naidu]

Try UserVmManagerImpl.java and VmwareResource.java.

-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 5:36 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:20 PM, ilya musayev  wrote:

> Erik
>
> Would you know where in the code? Looked around, could not find the place.
>
>
In 4.2, which was the last version we used with VMware, it was in
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/vmware/manager/VmwareStorageManagerImpl.java

However, it seems to have been refactored and I can't see it with the bare
eye at the moment for newer versions.

-- 
Erik

Re: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

[ilya musayev]

edit:

osdefault for Windows 2008 R2 ESXi 5.1+ should be set to LSI Logic SAS or 
lsisas1068


On 12/10/14, 2:04 PM, Somesh Naidu wrote:

Try registering the template as Windows Server 2008 (without the R2) instead 
and see if that fixes it.

-Original Message-
From: ilya musayev [mailto:ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 4:45 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Sateesh Chodapuneedi; Marcus
Subject: CloudStack and Windows 2008 R2 SCSI Disk Controller issue

CloudStack/CloudPlatform 4.3 defaults to LSI Logic Parallel and we need
to use LSI Logic SAS when windows VMs are created.

Would anyone know if there is a way to override the controller through
vm_details table and preset the controller to use there?

Right now it takes the options of scsi and ide, i've tried changing it
to osdefault (which should have addressed the issue, but it appears we
are still defaulting to LSI Logic Parallel)

osdefault for Windows 2008 R2 ESXi 5.1+ should be set to LSI Logic Parallel

Any help is appreciated,

Thanks
ilya

Re: SSH Keypairs listing is missing under the account tab

[Logan Barfield]

I don't think there was ever a way to manage SSH Keypairs via the UI, at
least not in the last couple of years.  Can you send a screenshot?


Thank You,

Logan Barfield
Tranquil Hosting

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Nux!  wrote:

> It's probably a bug, the UI has been a bit messed up, the additional IP
> info was also removed and added back in when I reported it.
>
> You should open a issue in jira.
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Ilia Shakitko" 
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Sent: Tuesday, 2 December, 2014 11:24:15
> > Subject: SSH Keypairs listing is missing under the account tab
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Didn't get any reaction on this. In 4.4.2 RC the account tab doesn't
> have the
> > dropdown box to find SSH Keypairs. Is that expected?
> >
> > Earlier versions of ACS had that option, was it moved somewhere or
> that's a bug?
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Ilia Shakitko
> > Innovation Engineer
> > LeaseWeb Technologies B.V.
> >
> > T: +31 20 316 0235
> > M:
> > E: i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com
> > W: http://www.leaseweb.com
> >
> > Luttenbergweg 8, 1101 EC Amsterdam, Netherlands
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ilia Shakitko [mailto:i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com]
> > Sent: maandag, 01 december, 2014 11:01
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [4.4][CLOUDSTACK][BUG?] - SSH Keypairs listing is missing
> under the
> > account tab
> >
> > Sorry for long reply. I am looking at release. And latest branch 4.4 -
> same bug.
> > No SSH Keypairs selector.
> >
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Ilia Shakitko
> > Innovation Engineer
> > LeaseWeb Technologies B.V.
> >
> > T: +31 20 316 0235
> > M:
> > E: i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com
> > W: http://www.leaseweb.com
> >
> > Luttenbergweg 8, 1101 EC Amsterdam, Netherlands
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
> > Sent: maandag, 24 november, 2014 15:29
> > To: dev
> > Subject: Re: [4.4][CLOUDSTACK][BUG?] - SSH Keypairs listing is missing
> under the
> > account tab
> >
> > Ilia,
> >
> > were you testing the release candidate or a release?
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Ilia Shakitko <
> i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >>
> >> Today I found (or actually not found) an option to list/manage SSH
> >> Keypairs under the Account tab which was here:
> >> http://clip2net.com/s/jlj2EP
> >>
> >> Is that a bug or it has been moved somewhere explicitly?
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >>
> >> Ilia Shakitko
> >> Innovation Engineer
> >> LeaseWeb Technologies B.V.
> >>
> >> T: +31 20 316 0235
> >>
> >> E: i.shaki...@tech.leaseweb.com
> >> W: www.leaseweb.com
> >>
> >> Luttenbergweg 8,1101 EC Amsterdam,  Netherlands
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Daan
>

Re: CloudStack Quality Process

[Rajani Karuturi]

Thanks for sharing the notes. Sorry, I couldn't make it this time. Will
definitely plan to join the next meeting.

~Rajani

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Folks
>
> We had good initial session this morning and we have started a public wiki
> [1] to allow us to collaborate. It is a scratch pad for start and we all
> will refine it as we go along. The link to recording and the chat log from
> today's meeting are also referenced in the wiki.
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Quality+and+Process+Improvement+Initiative
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:05 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> >
> > The meeting is on ...
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:56 PM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> > >
> > > Yes I am planning to record the GTM
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:59 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> > > >
> > > > Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so others
> > > > can view it if they are not able to attend (or only become
> > > > interested after the first couple meetings and wants to catch up)?
> > > >
> > > > Will
> > > > On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix.
> > > > >
> > > > > Here are the details.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1.  Please join my meeting.
> > > > > https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368
> > > > >
> > > > > 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is
> recommended.
> > > > > Or, call in using your telephone.
> > > > >
> > > > > United States: +1 (213) 493-0008
> > > > > Argentina (toll-free): 0 800 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800
> > > > > 191 358
> > > > > Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
> > > > > Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
> > > > > Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
> > > > > Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305
> > > > > Belarus (toll-free): 8 820 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800
> > > > > 81388
> > > > > Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
> > > > > Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909 Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800 120
> > > > > 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777
> > > > > 3281
> > > > > Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
> > > > > Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146
> > > > > China (toll-free): 4008 866154
> > > > > Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free):
> > > > > 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
> > > > > Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
> > > > > Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
> > > > > Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
> > > > > France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
> > > > > France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
> > > > > Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
> > > > > Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300
> > > > > Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free):
> > > > > 30774812 Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free):
> > > > > 800 9993 India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia
> > > > > (toll-free): 001 803
> > > > > 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818
> > > > > 263
> > > > > Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
> > > > > Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020
> > > > > Italy (toll-free): 800 792289
> > > > > Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
> > > > > Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200
> > > > > Korea, Republic of (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free):
> > > > > 800
> > > > > 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free): 01
> > > > > 800
> > > > > 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
> > > > > Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759
> > > > > New Zealand (toll-free): 0 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974
> > > > > 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
> > > > > Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
> > > > > Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800 55253
> > > > > Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland (toll-free): 00
> > > > > 800
> > > > > 3211434 Portugal (toll-free): 800 180 139 Romania (toll-free): 0
> > > > > 800
> > > > > 410 025 Russian Federation (toll-free): 8 800 100 6914 Saudi
> > > > > Arabia
> > > > > (toll-free): 800 844 3636 Singapore (toll-free): 800 101 3000
> > > > > South Africa (toll-free): 0 800 555 451 Spain (toll-free): 800 900
> > > > > 593
> > > > > Spain: +34 931 76 1534
> > > > > Sweden (toll-free): 020 794 545
> > > > > Sweden: +46 (0) 852 500 691
> > > > > Switzerland (toll-free): 0 800 000 452
> > > > > Switzerland: +41 (0) 435 0026 89
> > > > > Taiwan (toll-free): 0 800 666 846
> > > > > Thailand (toll-free): 001 800 852 2442 Tu

Review Request 28931: CLOUDSTACK:8058: Fix test_reset_ssh_keypair.py for EIP setup

[Gaurav Aradhye]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28931/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8058
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8058


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

The publicIP of the VM changes on EIP setup after stop and start operation. 
Hence it is necessary that on such setup, new publicip should be used for the 
SSH.

Made the necessary changes to use the new publicip.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_reset_ssh_keypair.py 370e9a8 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28931/diff/


Testing
---

Yes.

On Advanced zone:
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine for non admin non root ... === 
TestName: test_01_reset_keypair_normal_user | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine for domain admin non root ... === 
TestName: test_02_reset_keypair_domain_admin | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine for domain admin root ... === TestName: 
test_03_reset_keypair_root_admin | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Reset SSH keys for VM  already having SSH key ... === TestName: 
test_01_reset_ssh_keys | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  created from password enabled template and ... === 
TestName: test_02_reset_ssh_key_password_enabled_template | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH key for VM  having no SSH key ... === TestName: 
test_03_reset_ssh_with_no_key | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  created from password enabled template and ... === 
TestName: test_04_reset_key_passwd_enabled_no_key | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  already having SSH key when VM is in running ... === 
TestName: test_05_reset_key_in_running_state | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  created from password enabled template and ... === 
TestName: test_06_reset_key_passwd_enabled_vm_running | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine with incorrect parameters ... === 
TestName: test_07_reset_keypair_invalid_params | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 10 tests in 4553.103s

OK


On EIP setup (basic zone):
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine for non admin non root ... === 
TestName: test_01_reset_keypair_normal_user | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine for domain admin non root ... === 
TestName: test_02_reset_keypair_domain_admin | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine for domain admin root ... === TestName: 
test_03_reset_keypair_root_admin | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test Reset SSH keys for VM  already having SSH key ... === TestName: 
test_01_reset_ssh_keys | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  created from password enabled template and ... === 
TestName: test_02_reset_ssh_key_password_enabled_template | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH key for VM  having no SSH key ... === TestName: 
test_03_reset_ssh_with_no_key | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  created from password enabled template and ... === 
TestName: test_04_reset_key_passwd_enabled_no_key | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  already having SSH key when VM is in running ... === 
TestName: test_05_reset_key_in_running_state | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Reset SSH keys for VM  created from password enabled template and ... === 
TestName: test_06_reset_key_passwd_enabled_vm_running | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Verify API resetSSHKeyForVirtualMachine with incorrect parameters ... === 
TestName: test_07_reset_keypair_invalid_params | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 10 tests in 3443.114s

OK


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye

Re: Pierre-Luc Dion as Jenkins Admin

[Daan Hoogland]

Will, the people to arrange such a thing would be Hugo, David or
Prasanna. He can ask any of them, I think.

On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Will Stevens  wrote:
> I would like propose that we give Pierre-Luc Dion an Admin account on
> http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/.  He manages all of our Jenkins servers
> here at CloudOps and has Jenkins slaves ready to be added to the
> buildacloud pool.
>
> He has provided credentials and an endpoint for our machines to be added to
> the pool, but they have not yet been added.
>
> The system vms have not built in over a week because the 'systemvmbuilder'
> is offline.  There are changes to the currently broken system vms (in 4.5)
> which we would like to test to verify resolution, but we are currently
> blocked.
>
> He is very active in the community and is very knowledgeable in this space
> so I think he would be a valuable asset to help manage this infra.
>
> Cheers,
>
> *Will STEVENS*
> Lead Developer
>
> *CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
> 420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
> w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_



-- 
Daan

Review Request 28935: CLOUDSATCK-8062: test_multiple_ip_ranges.py - Fix the test case to avoid using same vlan IP range in each test case

[Gaurav Aradhye]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/28935/
---

Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-8062
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8062


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

Each test case in this test suite uses the same vlan IP range, adds it and 
deletes it. In some cases, the vlan IP range deletion fails due to this 
operation.

Change the test case to use different vlan IP range each time.


Other changes:
1) Fix imports
2) Remove Service dict from test case and use data from test_data.py instead.
3) Fix pep8 issues.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_multiple_ip_ranges.py 32c39f7 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/28935/diff/


Testing
---

yes.

Log:
Test add guest ip range in the existing cidr ... === TestName: 
test_01_add_ip_same_cidr | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test add ip range in a new cidr ... === TestName: test_02_add_ip_diff_cidr | 
Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test delete ip range ... === TestName: test_03_del_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS 
===
ok
Test adding non-contiguous ip range in existing cidr ... === TestName: 
test_04_add_noncontiguous_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test adding overlapped ip range in existing cidr ... === TestName: 
test_05_add_overlapped_ip_range | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test adding overlapped ip range with two existing cidr ... === TestName: 
test_06_add_ip_range_overlapped_with_two_ranges | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test adding ip range superset to existing CIDR ... === TestName: 
test_07_add_iprange_superset | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
Test adding ip range subset to existing CIDR ... === TestName: 
test_08_add_iprange_subset | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

--
Ran 8 tests in 1.583s

OK


Thanks,

Gaurav Aradhye

RE: CloudStack Quality Process

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

Don’t worry the first meeting went all over and the wiki needs a lot of cleanup 
and capture of discussion that we had. Stay tuned

> -Original Message-
> From: Rajani Karuturi [mailto:raj...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 8:48 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: Steve Wilson
> Subject: Re: CloudStack Quality Process
> 
> Thanks for sharing the notes. Sorry, I couldn't make it this time. Will 
> definitely
> plan to join the next meeting.
> 
> ~Rajani
> 
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 1:27 AM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
> animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:
> 
> > Folks
> >
> > We had good initial session this morning and we have started a public
> > wiki [1] to allow us to collaborate. It is a scratch pad for start and
> > we all will refine it as we go along. The link to recording and the
> > chat log from today's meeting are also referenced in the wiki.
> >
> > [1]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Quality+and+Pro
> > cess+Improvement+Initiative
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:05 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> > >
> > > The meeting is on ...
> > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 8:56 PM
> > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> > > >
> > > > Yes I am planning to record the GTM
> > > >
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: Will Stevens [mailto:williamstev...@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 6:59 PM
> > > > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > > > Cc: Steve Wilson
> > > > > Subject: RE: CloudStack Quality Process
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it possible to record the meeting? Maybe we can post it so
> > > > > others can view it if they are not able to attend (or only
> > > > > become interested after the first couple meetings and wants to catch 
> > > > > up)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Will
> > > > > On Dec 9, 2014 9:52 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi"
> > > > > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I can setup a GTM since it is free for Citrix.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here are the details.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1.  Please join my meeting.
> > > > > > https://www1.gotomeeting.com/join/285394368
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2.  Use your microphone and speakers (VoIP) - a headset is
> > recommended.
> > > > > > Or, call in using your telephone.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > United States: +1 (213) 493-0008 Argentina (toll-free): 0 800
> > > > > > 444 2385 Australia (toll-free): 1 800
> > > > > > 191 358
> > > > > > Australia: +61 2 9091 7603
> > > > > > Austria (toll-free): 0 800 080061
> > > > > > Austria: +43 (0) 7 2088 0716
> > > > > > Bahrain (toll-free): 800 81 305 Belarus (toll-free): 8 820
> > > > > > 0011 0331 Belgium (toll-free): 0 800
> > > > > > 81388
> > > > > > Belgium: +32 (0) 28 08 4372
> > > > > > Brazil (toll-free): 0 800 047 4909 Bulgaria (toll-free): 00800
> > > > > > 120
> > > > > > 4413 Canada (toll-free): 1 877 777
> > > > > > 3281
> > > > > > Canada: +1 (647) 497-9380
> > > > > > Chile (toll-free): 800 395 146 China (toll-free): 4008 866154
> > > > > > Colombia (toll-free): 01 800 012 9057 Czech Republic (toll-free):
> > > > > > 800 500453 Denmark (toll-free): 8025 0919
> > > > > > Denmark: +45 (0) 69 91 84 58
> > > > > > Finland (toll-free): 0 800 94473
> > > > > > Finland: +358 (0) 931 58 1773
> > > > > > France (toll-free): 0 805 541 052
> > > > > > France: +33 (0) 170 950 590
> > > > > > Germany (toll-free): 0 800 184 4230
> > > > > > Germany: +49 (0) 692 5736 7300 Greece (toll-free): 00 800 4414
> > > > > > 4282 Hong Kong (toll-free):
> > > > > > 30774812 Hungary (toll-free): (06) 80 986 259 Iceland (toll-free):
> > > > > > 800 9993 India (toll-free): 000 800 100 8227 Indonesia
> > > > > > (toll-free): 001 803
> > > > > > 020 2563 Ireland (toll-free): 1 800 818
> > > > > > 263
> > > > > > Ireland: +353 (0) 15 133 006
> > > > > > Israel (toll-free): 1 809 388 020 Italy (toll-free): 800
> > > > > > 792289
> > > > > > Italy: +39 0 699 26 68 65
> > > > > > Japan (toll-free): 0 120 242 200 Korea, Republic of
> > > > > > (toll-free): 0806180880 Luxembourg (toll-free):
> > > > > > 800
> > > > > > 81016 Malaysia (toll-free): 1 800 81 6860 Mexico (toll-free):
> > > > > > 01
> > > > > > 800
> > > > > > 123 8367 Netherlands (toll-free): 0 800 020 0178
> > > > > > Netherlands: +31 (0) 208 080 759 New Zealand (toll-free): 0
> > > > > > 800 47 0051 New Zealand: +64 (0) 9 974
> > > > > > 9579 Norway (toll-free): 800 69 055
> > > > > > Norway: +47 21 04 30 59
> > > > > > Panama (toll-free): 001 800 507 2789 Peru (toll-free): 0 800
> > > > > > 55253 Philippines (toll-free): 1 800 1110 1565 Poland
> > > > > > (toll-free): 00
> > > > > > 800
> > > > > > 3211434 

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.4.2

[Wei ZHOU]

Hi Daan,
Can you cherry-pick 4eedfe53fcbab1d47b09eacaca1d803b67b6c4d2 to 4.4 ?
-Wei

2014-12-10 20:37 GMT+01:00 Daan Hoogland :

> This was stuck in my drafts, I had not send it due to the ldap issue
> that was not yet announced and then forgot. Sorry for that.
>
> Hi all,
>
> After 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.4.2 *passes* with
> 3 PMC + 1 non-PMC votes.
>
> +1 (PMC / binding)
> 3 person
>
> +1 (non binding)
> 1 person
>
> 0
> 1 person
>
> -1
> none
>
> Thanks to everyone participating.
>
> I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours
> to give the mirrors time to catch up.
>
>
>
> --
> Daan
>

Re: Ubuntu 14.04 support on host servers

[Rohit Yadav]

Hi Andrei,

I use Ubuntu 14.04 as both KVM hosts and for running management/usage servers, 
it works for me.

On Thursday 11 December 2014 01:59 AM, Andrei Mikhailovsky wrote:

Hello guys,

Does anyone know if ubuntu server 14.04 on host servers is currently supported 
in acs 4.4 branch? I've seen some issues with getting the usage stats for acs 
4.2.1 ,so wondering if the latest acs is ready for the latest ubuntu server lts 
as a host server?

Cheers

Andrei



--
Regards,
Rohit Yadav
Software Architect, ShapeBlue
M. +91 8826230892 | rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
Blog: bhaisaab.org | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
PS. If you see any footer below, I did not add it :)

Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services

IaaS Cloud Design & Build
CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework
CloudStack Consulting
CloudStack Software 
Engineering
CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support
CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely 
for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions 
expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of 
Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show 
it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email 
in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. 
ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company 
incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue 
SA Pty Ltd is a company registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded 
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.