Re: [jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-5890) Error while collecting disk stats from vm

[Daan Hoogland]

David,

I know Wei Zhou committed a patch. It is in master and it should be in
4.3 as well.

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:05 AM, David Bierce (JIRA)  wrote:
>
> [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13889943#comment-13889943
>  ]
>
> David Bierce edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-5890 at 2/3/14 11:04 PM:
> ---
>
> After upgrading from 4.1.1 to 4.2.1 I appear to be having this issue as well. 
>  Which version was this fixed or is there still more information required?  
> Digging through the commit logs I don't see a patch submitted to this in 
> master, 4.3 or 4.2.
>
>
> was (Author: dbierce):
> After upgrading from 4.1.1 to 4.2.1 I appear to be having this issue as well. 
>  Which version was this fixed or is there still more information required?
>
>> Error while collecting disk stats from vm
>> -
>>
>> Key: CLOUDSTACK-5890
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5890
>> Project: CloudStack
>>  Issue Type: Bug
>>  Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
>> default.)
>>  Components: Management Server, XenServer
>>Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.3.0
>>Reporter: Daan Hoogland
>>
>> "Error while collecting disk stats from" is thrown a lot of times.
>> 2014-01-16 00:00:56,006 WARN  [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] 
>> (DirectAgent-137:null) Error while collecting disk stats from :
>> You gave an invalid object reference.  The object may have recently been 
>> deleted.  The class parameter gives the type of reference given, and the 
>> handle parameter echoes the bad value given.
>> at com.xensource.xenapi.Types.checkResponse(Types.java:209)
>> at com.xensource.xenapi.Connection.dispatch(Connection.java:368)
>> at 
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool$XenServerConnection.dispatch(XenServerConnectionPool.java:909)
>> at com.xensource.xenapi.VBDMetrics.getIoReadKbs(VBDMetrics.java:210)
>> at 
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.getVmStats(CitrixResourceBase.java:2791)
>> at 
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixResourceBase.java:2691)
>> at 
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(CitrixResourceBase.java:497)
>> at 
>> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServer56Resource.executeRequest(XenServer56Resource.java:59)
>> at 
>> com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.run(DirectAgentAttache.java:186)
>> at 
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:471)
>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:334)
>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:166)
>> at 
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:165)
>> at 
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:266)
>> at 
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1110)
>> at 
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603)
>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:679)
>> xapi returns HANDLE_INVALID, after which the whole collection process for 
>> stops for this host as it is caught outside the loop.
>
>
>
> --
> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
> (v6.1.5#6160)



-- 
Daan

Re: Review Request 17658: Added Few changes for CLOUDSTACK-5980

[Girish Shilamkar]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17658/#review33578
---

Ship it!


Committed to marvin branch.

- Girish Shilamkar


On Feb. 3, 2014, 1:05 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17658/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5980
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5980
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> 1. Added a timeout flag to execute.. command under sshClient
> 2. Added a break in finally for createConnection,when command is successful, 
> earlier it was running despite that
> 3. Added load.. call  when key_pair files are passed.
> 4. Cleaned up few things under cloudstackConnection.
> 
> Please apply it on marvin branch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py 8413ac0 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/sshClient.py 09dc6f3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17658/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Ran pep8 and more tests as part of marvin branch will be run.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Santhosh Edukulla
> 
>

Re: Review Request 17658: Added Few changes for CLOUDSTACK-5980

[ASF Subversion and Git Services]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17658/#review33577
---


Commit 286afda5d687b167691c17bf15aaf55738953383 in branch refs/heads/marvin 
from Santhosh Edukulla
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=286afda ]

CLOUDSTACK-5980: Fix test case failing with "Error reading SSH protocol banner" 
ssh error


- ASF Subversion and Git Services


On Feb. 3, 2014, 1:05 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17658/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 1:05 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.
> 
> 
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5980
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5980
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> 1. Added a timeout flag to execute.. command under sshClient
> 2. Added a break in finally for createConnection,when command is successful, 
> earlier it was running despite that
> 3. Added load.. call  when key_pair files are passed.
> 4. Cleaned up few things under cloudstackConnection.
> 
> Please apply it on marvin branch.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackConnection.py 8413ac0 
>   tools/marvin/marvin/sshClient.py 09dc6f3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17658/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Ran pep8 and more tests as part of marvin branch will be run.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Santhosh Edukulla
> 
>

RE: API Documentation Job

[Alex Hitchins]

Hi Ian,

I think this might be down to dos/unix formatting.

[INFO] --- exec-maven-plugin:1.2.1:exec (compile) @ cloud-apidoc ---
./build-apidoc.sh: line 18: $'\r': command not found
./build-apidoc.sh: line 19: $'\r': command not found
./build-apidoc.sh: line 24: $'shift\r': command not found
./build-apidoc.sh: line 26: $'shift\r': command not found
./build-apidoc.sh: line 28: $'shift\r': command not found
./build-apidoc.sh: line 29: $'\r': command not found
./build-apidoc.sh: line 30: syntax error near unexpected token `$'\r''
'/build-apidoc.sh: line 30: `canonical_readlink ()

I think Paul Angus has got it to build successfully now. I'll try his route.



Alex Hitchins
T: +44 1892 523 587
M: +44 7788 423 969

-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
Sent: 04 February 2014 00:17
To: CloudStack Dev
Subject: RE: API Documentation Job

Can you paste the errors/output you get?
On 3 Feb 2014 22:13, "Alex Hitchins"  wrote:

> It still complains for me. I'll refresh myself tomorrow morning and
> see if I get anywhere.
>
> One thing I haven't tried is checking out the 4.2.1 branch, I've been
> doing it all on master.
>
> Thank you for trying Ian. I'm sure I'll get there soon.
>
>
>
> Alex Hitchins
> T: +44 1892 523 587
> M: +44 7788 423 969
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie]
> Sent: 03 February 2014 21:56
> To: CloudStack Dev
> Subject: Re: API Documentation Job
>
> Didn't come across any issues when trying to compile it.
>
> Did a usual full compile of mvn -Pdeveloper clean install
> Documentation was generated and placed into
> /tools/apidoc/target/apidoc.tar.bz2
>
> http://people.apache.org/~duffy/apidocs/xmldoc/html/
>
> The header reads 4.2.0 due to a hard coded value in the templates.
>
>
>
>
> On 3 February 2014 16:47, Alex Hitchins 
> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Has anyone recently been able to generate the API documentation, as
> > described here?
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/How+To+Genera
> > te
> > +CloudStack+API+Documentation
> >
> >
> > I've been trying without success. I know Paul Angus has also been
> > having issues with this. I just wanted to see if it was a bigger issue.
> >
> > Many thanks,
> >
> > Alex
> > Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> > Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the
> > best
> > 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
> >
> > Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
> >
> > **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> > 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> > 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> > 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> > 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> > 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<
> > http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> >
> > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> > intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> > Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and
> > do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> > companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> > must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or
> > show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> > received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company
> > incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> > company incorporated in India and is operated under license from
> > Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company
> > incorporated in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> > Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
> registered trademark.
> >
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
> intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
> Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
> not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related
> companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you
> must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show
> it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have
> received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated
> in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company
> incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in
> Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a 
> registered trademark.
>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of 

Review Request 17702: CLOUDSTACK-2232: Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature

[Ashutosh Kelkar]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/
---

Review request for cloudstack and Girish Shilamkar.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2232
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2232


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_persistent_networks.py f61ccaa 
  tools/marvin/marvin/config/config.cfg 5849fe8 
  tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py 409530c 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Ashutosh Kelkar

Review Request 17703: base.py fix for Dynamic compute offerings , added a new test case for custom compute offerings

[prashant mishra]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17703/
---

Review request for cloudstack, sanjeev n, Santhosh Edukulla, and 
SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.


Bugs: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5951

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5951


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

with dynamic computer offering feature  service offering can be created without 
cpunumber,cpuspeed , memory and these values can be provided at time of vm 
deployment 

issue in base.py: cpuspeed,cpunumber,memory is compulsory to create SO and 
these values cant be passed in deployVirtualMachine  API.
 
Fix: cpuspeed, cpunumber,memory will be optional  parameter, and these values 
can be passed in  deployVirtualMachine API.


Diffs
-

  test_custom_compute_offering.py PRE-CREATION 
  tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py aa23029 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17703/diff/


Testing
---

Tested vm deployment with regular computer offering and custom compute offerings


Thanks,

prashant mishra

Re: Review Request 17702: CLOUDSTACK-2232: Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature

[Ashutosh Kelkar]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/
---

(Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 12:08 p.m.)


Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla.


Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-2232
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2232


Repository: cloudstack-git


Description
---

Adding automation test cases for Persistent Networks feature.


Diffs
-

  test/integration/component/test_persistent_networks.py f61ccaa 
  tools/marvin/marvin/config/config.cfg 5849fe8 
  tools/marvin/marvin/integration/lib/base.py 409530c 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17702/diff/


Testing
---


Thanks,

Ashutosh Kelkar

RE: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

[Paul Angus]

Hey Tejas,

cifs%3A%2F%2F10.129.151.155hcloud%2Fsecondary%3Fuser%3Dadministrator%26domain%3Dnwx.com

Theres a "/" ("%2F") missing between 10.129.151.155 and hcloud - my 
recollection is that primary and secondary storage UIs are not consistent, add 
the secondary path as /hcloud/secondary

re primary - is the agent service running? it doesn't seem to (always) 
automatically start even when it's set to automatic in services.

Regards,

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com

From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 12:15
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: rajesh.batt...@citrix.com; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

Hi Paul,
I tried with "hcloud/primary" and
primary storage shows Unsupported command issued.

secondary storage shows Failed to add data store: cifs URI missing host and/or 
path. Make sure it's of the format 
cifs://hostname/path?user=&password=

After that I was trying to add secondary storage with /hcloud/secondary, I 
didn't show much activity in log.
In Cloudstack console, secondary storage got added, but protocol is CIFS and 
provider is NFS.

Please find attached logs. and screenshot from attached secondary storage.

Regards,
Tejas

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Paul Angus 
mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Tejas, You have hcloud\primary, it should be hcloud/primary

Regards

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: 
+447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com>

From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 05:16
To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: rajesh.batt...@citrix.com; 
dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3
Hi,
I have tried to add Primary Storage as suggested above, I am getting similar 
error.
Failed to add data store: 
cifs://10.129.151.155/hcloud\primary?user=administrator&password=abc_123&domain=nwx.com
 is not a valid uri
Regards,
Tejas

On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Tejas Gadaria 
mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com>>>
 wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your replay.
I was entering the path exactly what you predicted.  ("\\server\share\directory 
 
 
")
I will try to add primary storage with 'share/folder' and the 'server' without 
the \\ path .
Regards,
Tejas
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Paul Angus 
mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>>>
 wrote:
Tejas,
I guess that your entering the path as an smb path 
\\server\share\directory>
For primary storage try 'share/folder' and the 'server' without the \\

There were issues with shared primary storage, so I've included one of the devs 
working on the feature.

The same is true for secondary storage (although the UI may need 
\share\directory in the path).

Regards

Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 
| M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com>

-Original Message-
From: Sean Hamilton 
[mailto:s...@seanhamilton.co.uk>]
Sent: 01 February 2014 11:55
To: 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: 
us...@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

Hi Tejas,

What hypervisor are you using?
I can't remember if CIFS is a valid protocol for hypervisors other than 
Hyper-V. NFS is used for other hypervisors.

Cheers,
Sean
> On 1 Feb 2014, at 09:26, Tejas Gadaria 
> mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com>>>
>  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While adding primary Storage I am getting
>
>  
> "cifs://10.129.151.155/\\hcloud\primary\?user=administrator&password=abc_123&domain=nwx.com
>  is not a valid uri"
>
> Similar error I am facing while adding secondary storage also.
>
> Please find attachment for logs,
>
>
> Regards,
> Tejas
> 
> 
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudS

Re: Review Request 17576: Detect & log unknown parameters for CS API and refactoring

[daan Hoogland]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17576/#review33580
---

Ship it!


447430c3df38c36d947c44c4aebd961d8cbb14c4

- daan Hoogland


On Feb. 3, 2014, 10:48 p.m., Antonio Fornie wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17576/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 10:48 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Detect & log unknown parameters for CS API and refactoring. There are plenty 
> of changes for just refactoring purpose, but they are all related, most of 
> them interdependant
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/ApiConstants.java d500303 
>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/BaseCmd.java 4229ec9 
>   api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/BaseListCmd.java c1a4b4c 
>   
> api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/autoscale/CreateAutoScaleVmProfileCmd.java
>  bee1b22 
>   
> server/resources/META-INF/cloudstack/core/spring-server-core-misc-context.xml 
> fd2f5fb 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java 71ac616 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiDispatcher.java 55ef53a 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServer.java d715db6 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiServlet.java 46f7eba 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/ParameterHandler.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/CommandCreationWorker.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/DispatchChain.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/DispatchChainFactory.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/DispatchWorker.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamGenericValidationWorker.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamProcessWorker.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamSemanticValidationWorker.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/as/AutoScaleManagerImpl.java a2cc32e 
>   server/src/com/cloud/network/router/VirtualNetworkApplianceManagerImpl.java 
> bf2516a 
>   server/src/com/cloud/storage/snapshot/SnapshotSchedulerImpl.java 3159059 
>   server/test/com/cloud/api/ApiDispatcherTest.java 7314a57 
>   server/test/com/cloud/api/dispatch/CommandCreationWorkerTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   server/test/com/cloud/api/dispatch/DispatchChainFactoryTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   server/test/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamGenericValidationWorkerTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
>   server/test/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamProcessWorkerTest.java PRE-CREATION 
>   server/test/com/cloud/api/dispatch/ParamSemanticValidationWorkerTest.java 
> PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17576/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> mvn full build and manual test of functionalities
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Antonio Fornie
> 
>

Re: Review Request 16523: Unit tests for Juniper contrail VM Interface Model and Instance Ip Model class.

[daan Hoogland]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/16523/#review33581
---


sorry to bug you again but the tests give checkstyle errors. Can you fix these 
and resubmit?

- daan Hoogland


On Feb. 3, 2014, 10:15 p.m., Sachchidanand Vaidya wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/16523/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 3, 2014, 10:15 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> Added unit tests for Juniper contrail VM Interface Model and Instance Ip 
> Model class.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   
> plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/contrail/management/InstanceIpModelTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   
> plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/test/org/apache/cloudstack/network/contrail/management/VMInterfaceModelTest.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16523/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> All Juniper contrail plugin unit tests pass without any error.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sachchidanand Vaidya
> 
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.3.0 (third round)

[Srikanteswararao Talluri]

+1 

No product issues observed in BVT runs.

CloudStack built from commit: 8f63c2cf9c463373d774cb563e63fc56828e1418

On KVM(CentOS 6.3)/Test Run: #1185 and #1186

5 of the test failures are not valid because snapshots, scaling VM are
not supported on KVM Hypervisor and more intermittent test script/env issue
related to ssh.
--- 
Link to reports: 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1185/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1186/testReport/

Total:97
Fail :5
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 3   0   0
test_guest_vlan_range/1   0   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
test_scale_vm/0   1   0
test_ssvm/   10   0   0
test_network/ 7   0   0
test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
test_volumes/ 8   1   0
test_affinity_groups/ 1   0   0
test_routers/ 9   0   0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2   0   0
test_network_acl/ 1   0   0
test_vm_life_cycle/  10   0   0
test_privategw_acl/   1   0   0
test_internal_lb/ 1   0   0
test_deploy_vm/   1   0   0
test_global_settings/ 1   0   0
test_nic/ 1   0   0
test_public_ip_range/ 1   0   0
test_iso/ 5   0   1
test_service_offerings/   4   0   0
test_multipleips_per_nic/ 1   0   0
test_regions/ 1   0   0
test_templates/   7   0   1
test_vpc_vpn/ 2   0   0
test_vm_snapshots/0   3   0
test_portable_publicip/   2   0   0
test_pvlan/   1   0   0



On XenServer 6.2/Test Run: #1187 and #1188

3 failures are intermittent test script/env issues related to ssh.
--- 
Link to reports: 
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1187/testReport/
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/test-smoke-matrix-4.3/1188/testReport/

Total:97
Fail :3
Skip :2


name   passfailskip
test_loadbalance/ 3   0   0
test_guest_vlan_range/1   0   0
test_deploy_vms_with_varied_deploymentplanners/   3   0   0
test_non_contigiousvlan/  1   0   0
test_reset_vm_on_reboot/  1   0   0
test_resource_detail/ 1   0   0
test_scale_vm/1   0   0
test_ssvm/   10   0   0
test_network/ 7   0   0
test_disk_offerings/  3   0   0
test_volumes/ 9   0   0
test_affinity_groups/ 1   0   0
test_routers/ 9   0   0
test_deploy_vm_with_userdata/ 2   0   0
test_network_acl/ 1   0   0
test_vm_life_cycle/  10   0   0
test_privategw_acl/   1   0   0
test_internal_lb/ 1   0   0
test_deploy_vm/   1   0   0
test_global_settings/ 1   0   0
test_nic/ 1   0   0
test_public_ip_range/ 1   0   0
test_iso/ 5   0   1
test_service_offerings/   4   0 

Update on CCC Denver

[Sebastien Goasguen]

Hi,

Quick update on CCC Denver, we had 72 submissions.

Currently David Nalley, Giles Sirrett, Talluri and I can review the papers.
if anyone wants to review please send me an email,

Cheers,

-Sebastien

Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi Paul,

I tried with "hcloud/primary" and
primary storage shows Unsupported command issued.

secondary storage shows Failed to add data store: cifs URI missing host
and/or path. Make sure it's of the format
cifs://hostname/path?user=&password=

After that I was trying to add secondary storage with /hcloud/secondary, I
didn't show much activity in log.
In Cloudstack console, secondary storage got added, but protocol is CIFS
and provider is NFS.

Please find attached logs. and screenshot from attached secondary storage.

Regards,
Tejas


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Paul Angus wrote:

> Tejas, You have hcloud\primary, it should be hcloud/primary
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> From: Tejas Gadaria [mailto:refond.g...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 04 February 2014 05:16
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: rajesh.batt...@citrix.com; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3
>
> Hi,
> I have tried to add Primary Storage as suggested above, I am getting
> similar error.
> Failed to add data store: cifs://
> 10.129.151.155/hcloud\primary?user=administrator&password=abc_123&domain=nwx.com
> <
> http://10.129.151.155/hcloud%5Cprimary?user=administrator&password=abc_123@123&domain=nwx.com>
> is not a valid uri
> Regards,
> Tejas
>
> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Tejas Gadaria  > wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> Thanks for your replay.
> I was entering the path exactly what you predicted.
>  ("\\server\share\directory  ")
> I will try to add primary storage with 'share/folder' and the 'server'
> without the \\ path .
> Regards,
> Tejas
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Paul Angus  > wrote:
> Tejas,
>
> I guess that your entering the path as an smb path
> \\server\share\directory
> For primary storage try 'share/folder' and the 'server' without the \\
>
> There were issues with shared primary storage, so I've included one of the
> devs working on the feature.
>
> The same is true for secondary storage (although the UI may need
> \share\directory in the path).
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Angus
> Cloud Architect
> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: 
> +447711418784
> | T: CloudyAngus
> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean Hamilton [mailto:s...@seanhamilton.co.uk s...@seanhamilton.co.uk>]
> Sent: 01 February 2014 11:55
> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3
>
> Hi Tejas,
>
> What hypervisor are you using?
> I can't remember if CIFS is a valid protocol for hypervisors other than
> Hyper-V. NFS is used for other hypervisors.
>
> Cheers,
> Sean
>
> > On 1 Feb 2014, at 09:26, Tejas Gadaria  refond.g...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > While adding primary Storage I am getting
> >
> >  "cifs://
> 10.129.151.155/\\hcloud\primary\?user=administrator&password=abc_123&domain=nwx.com
> <
> http://10.129.151.155/%5C%5Chcloud%5Cprimary%5C?user=administrator&password=abc_123&domain=nwx.com>
> is not a valid uri"
> >
> > Similar error I am facing while adding secondary storage also.
> >
> > Please find attachment for logs,
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tejas
> > 
> > 
> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the best
> 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
>
> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>
> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<
> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
> Ltd. Shape Blue Br

CLOUDSTACK-6023: Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

[Joris van Lieshout]

Hi All,

Today I've submitted this bug: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6023 
Because this bug has stability impact on XenServer I'm mentioning it here as 
well. In my opinion it may impact the current vote on 4.3.

Thanks you 

Kind regards, 
Joris van Lieshout


Schuberg Philis
Boeingavenue 271
1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
schubergphilis.com 

+31 207506672
+31651428188
_ 

Re: Update on CCC Denver

[Mike Tutkowski]

Hi Sebastien (sending this reply to the entire mailing list),

Can you give me an idea as to the time commitment required for this review
process and what's involved (including deadline for completion)?

I'm happy to help, but I just need to make sure I can fit it into my
current schedule.

Thanks!


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Quick update on CCC Denver, we had 72 submissions.
>
> Currently David Nalley, Giles Sirrett, Talluri and I can review the papers.
> if anyone wants to review please send me an email,
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Sebastien
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: Update on CCC Denver

[Mike Tutkowski]

(Figured I'd send it to the entire mailing list because your reply may be
of interest to others.)


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Mike Tutkowski  wrote:

> Hi Sebastien (sending this reply to the entire mailing list),
>
> Can you give me an idea as to the time commitment required for this review
> process and what's involved (including deadline for completion)?
>
> I'm happy to help, but I just need to make sure I can fit it into my
> current schedule.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Quick update on CCC Denver, we had 72 submissions.
>>
>> Currently David Nalley, Giles Sirrett, Talluri and I can review the
>> papers.
>> if anyone wants to review please send me an email,
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Sebastien
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the 
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: Update on CCC Denver

[David Nalley]

>From my perspective, it's a minimum of several hours of review time.
I've probably spent 4 hours already reading abstracts and bios, and
providing feedback in the interface, and am just over 1/2 done with
the CloudStack reviews.

--David

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Mike Tutkowski
 wrote:
> Hi Sebastien (sending this reply to the entire mailing list),
>
> Can you give me an idea as to the time commitment required for this review
> process and what's involved (including deadline for completion)?
>
> I'm happy to help, but I just need to make sure I can fit it into my
> current schedule.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Quick update on CCC Denver, we had 72 submissions.
>>
>> Currently David Nalley, Giles Sirrett, Talluri and I can review the papers.
>> if anyone wants to review please send me an email,
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -Sebastien
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6023: Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

[Daan Hoogland]

Hello community,

This is not the only serious bug Joris has filed today. The other one
is quite some older and we ran into it only now because before we
hadn't been using internal addresses in the 172.16 or 192.168 ranges.
This one is CLOUDSTACK-6020 and may not impede the RC but I think 6023
does. Before I cast my -1 I want to hear some more opinions on it.

regards,
Daan

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Joris van Lieshout
 wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Today I've submitted this bug: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6023
> Because this bug has stability impact on XenServer I'm mentioning it here as 
> well. In my opinion it may impact the current vote on 4.3.
>
> Thanks you
>
> Kind regards,
> Joris van Lieshout
>
>
> Schuberg Philis
> Boeingavenue 271
> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
> schubergphilis.com
>
> +31 207506672
> +31651428188
> _
>
>



-- 
Daan

Re: Update on CCC Denver

[Sebastien Goasguen]

It will be as fast as you can read 140 paragraphs (abstract + bio ) and enter  
a rating. But you don't have to rate all. :)

The biggest item will creating the program , that could take an afternoon. I am 
hoping we can finish it all by next tuesday.

But again, help where u can and how much you can.

-Sebastien

> On 4 Feb 2014, at 16:21, Mike Tutkowski  wrote:
> 
> (Figured I'd send it to the entire mailing list because your reply may be
> of interest to others.)
> 
> 
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote:
> 
>> Hi Sebastien (sending this reply to the entire mailing list),
>> 
>> Can you give me an idea as to the time commitment required for this review
>> process and what's involved (including deadline for completion)?
>> 
>> I'm happy to help, but I just need to make sure I can fit it into my
>> current schedule.
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Quick update on CCC Denver, we had 72 submissions.
>>> 
>>> Currently David Nalley, Giles Sirrett, Talluri and I can review the
>>> papers.
>>> if anyone wants to review please send me an email,
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> -Sebastien
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> *Mike Tutkowski*
>> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
>> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
>> o: 303.746.7302
>> Advancing the way the world uses the 
>> cloud
>> *(tm)*
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*

Re: Update on CCC Denver

[Mike Tutkowski]

OK, that's doable for me.

Count me in.


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:37 AM, David Nalley  wrote:

> From my perspective, it's a minimum of several hours of review time.
> I've probably spent 4 hours already reading abstracts and bios, and
> providing feedback in the interface, and am just over 1/2 done with
> the CloudStack reviews.
>
> --David
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Mike Tutkowski
>  wrote:
> > Hi Sebastien (sending this reply to the entire mailing list),
> >
> > Can you give me an idea as to the time commitment required for this
> review
> > process and what's involved (including deadline for completion)?
> >
> > I'm happy to help, but I just need to make sure I can fit it into my
> > current schedule.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Sebastien Goasguen 
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Quick update on CCC Denver, we had 72 submissions.
> >>
> >> Currently David Nalley, Giles Sirrett, Talluri and I can review the
> papers.
> >> if anyone wants to review please send me an email,
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> -Sebastien
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3

[Tejas Gadaria]

Hi,

I have tried to add Primary Storage as suggested above, I am getting
similar error.
Failed to add data store: cifs://
10.129.151.155/hcloud\primary?user=administrator&password=abc_123&domain=nwx.comis
not a valid uri

Regards,
Tejas


On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Tejas Gadaria  wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> Thanks for your replay.
>
> I was entering the path exactly what you predicted.
> ("\\server\share\directory ")
> I will try to add primary storage with 'share/folder' and the 'server'
> without the \\ path .
>
> Regards,
> Tejas
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
>
>> Tejas,
>>
>> I guess that your entering the path as an smb path
>> \\server\share\directory
>> For primary storage try 'share/folder' and the 'server' without the \\
>>
>> There were issues with shared primary storage, so I've included one of
>> the devs working on the feature.
>>
>> The same is true for secondary storage (although the UI may need
>> \share\directory in the path).
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Paul Angus
>> Cloud Architect
>> S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
>> paul.an...@shapeblue.com
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sean Hamilton [mailto:s...@seanhamilton.co.uk]
>> Sent: 01 February 2014 11:55
>> To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Cc: us...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Not able to add primary Storage Cloudstack 4.3
>>
>> Hi Tejas,
>>
>> What hypervisor are you using?
>> I can't remember if CIFS is a valid protocol for hypervisors other than
>> Hyper-V. NFS is used for other hypervisors.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sean
>>
>> > On 1 Feb 2014, at 09:26, Tejas Gadaria  wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > While adding primary Storage I am getting
>> >
>> >  "cifs://
>> 10.129.151.155/\\hcloud\primary\?user=administrator&password=abc_123&domain=nwx.comis
>>  not a valid uri"
>> >
>> > Similar error I am facing while adding secondary storage also.
>> >
>> > Please find attachment for logs,
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Tejas
>> > 
>> > 
>> Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
>> Our CloudStack Infrastructure Support<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-infrastructure-support/> offers the best
>> 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.
>>
>> Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses
>>
>> **NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>> 18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. Classroom<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>> 17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>> 24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>> 16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, On-line<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>> 23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, On-line<
>> http://shapeblue.com/cloudstack-training/>
>>
>> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>> solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or
>> opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
>> represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the
>> intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
>> upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender
>> if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a
>> company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a
>> company incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue
>> Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil
>> and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a
>> registered trademark.
>>
>
>
2014-02-04 10:05:13,660 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:ctx-a34d261c) Completed resetting hosts suitable for reconnect
2014-02-04 10:05:13,660 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:ctx-a34d261c) Acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by this 
management server
2014-02-04 10:05:13,661 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:ctx-a34d261c) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters already owned by 
this management server
2014-02-04 10:05:13,661 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:ctx-a34d261c) Acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any management 
server
2014-02-04 10:05:13,661 DEBUG [c.c.h.d.HostDaoImpl] (ClusteredAgentManager 
Timer:ctx-a34d261c) Completed acquiring hosts for clusters not owned by any 
management server
2014-02-04 10:05:24,867 DEBUG [c.c.c.ConsoleProxyManagerImpl] 
(consoleproxy-1:ctx-5d57b443) Skip capacity scan due to there is no Primary 
Storage UPintenance mode
2014-02-04 10:05:36,240 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(StatsCollector-1:ctx-77d3eeca

[ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Chip Childers]

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he
has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Mike!

-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Daan Hoogland]

Mike, be inspiring to us all (as I am sure is a redundant wish)

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Chip Childers  wrote:
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he
> has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Mike!
>
> -The CloudStack PMC



-- 
Daan

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Giles Sirett]

Congratulations Mike

Kind Regards
Giles

D: +44 20 3603 0541 | M: +44 796 111 2055
giles.sir...@shapeblue.com



-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
Sent: 04 February 2014 16:21
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Mike 
Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Mike!

-The CloudStack PMC
Need Enterprise Grade Support for Apache CloudStack?
Our CloudStack Infrastructure 
Support offers the 
best 24/7 SLA for CloudStack Environments.

Apache CloudStack Bootcamp training courses

**NEW!** CloudStack 4.2.1 training
18th-19th February 2014, Brazil. 
Classroom
17th-23rd March 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
24th-28th March 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line
16th-20th June 2014, Region A. Instructor led, 
On-line
23rd-27th June 2014, Region B. Instructor led, 
On-line

This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended 
solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or 
opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the 
intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon 
its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you 
believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company 
incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company 
incorporated in India and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape 
Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated in Brasil and is 
operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

RE: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack

[Suresh Sadhu]

I like the monkeyinside-0.0.3.1.svg  and also  steroid monkey[ in this  it will 
be good if we reduce the fonsize  for the text " poweredby"]


Regards
Sadhu


From: Laszlo Hornyak [mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com]
Sent: 04 February 2014 03:38
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: market...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack

Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok 
with the trademark)

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak 
mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my previous 
design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a very easy job 
:-)

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland 
mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
our fellow primates)

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer 
mailto:kirk.jant...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I think
> if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
> this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but the
> idea)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kirk Jantzer
> http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland 
> mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>wrote:
>
>> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>>
>> sorry to nag,
>> Daan
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> > - Complete monkey added
>> > - "Apache" added
>> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> > This also comes with some cons:
>> > - 4 colors
>> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still readable,
>> even
>> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >
>> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the up to
>> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >
>> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack svg,
>> spot
>> > the difference :-)
>> >
>> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Laszlo
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland 
>> > mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com>>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I like,
>> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in there.
>> >> I think it must even.
>> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron 
>> >> mailto:rberg...@redhat.com>>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > - Original Message -
>> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" 
>> >> >> mailto:laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>>
>> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> Cc: 
>> >> >> market...@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for
>> CloudStack
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >>  - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >>  - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original logo. I
>> prefer
>> >> >> few
>> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >>  - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole thing needs
>> to
>> >> >> fit
>> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little detail (the
>> >> >> monkey is übercool anyway)
>> >> >>  - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >>  - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because it make make
>> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >>  - see attached file :)
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's going to
>> be
>> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though he's so
>> cute.)
>> >> >
>> >> > Two things -
>> >> >
>> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched as compared
>> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> intentional, not
>> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering on my
>> screen... :)
>> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do we want to
>> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason why it
>> shouldn't
>> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >
>> >> > -robyn
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley 
>> >> >> mailto:da...@gnsa.us>> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > If you happen to have

listServiceOfferings fails when executed with systemvmtype parameter

[Alena Prokharchyk]

Does anyone experience the same type of issue  - listServiceOffering with 
systemvmtype parameter fails with the DB exception? Whoever modified 
serviceofferingview and diskofferingview in 43-44.sql upgrade script, can you 
pls take a look?


localhost:8096/?command=listServiceOfferings&issystem=true&systemvmtype=domainrouter

ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (ApiServer-5:ctx-a08cd417 ctx-87002911) unhandled 
exception executing api command: listServiceOfferings
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Caught: 
com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3f2bba67: SELECT 
service_offering_view.id, service_offering_view.uuid, 
service_offering_view.name, service_offering_view.display_text, 
service_offering_view.tags, service_offering_view.use_local_storage, 
service_offering_view.system_use, service_offering_view.cpu, 
service_offering_view.speed, service_offering_view.ram_size, 
service_offering_view.nw_rate, service_offering_view.mc_rate, 
service_offering_view.ha_enabled, service_offering_view.limit_cpu_use, 
service_offering_view.is_volatile, service_offering_view.host_tag, 
service_offering_view.default_use, service_offering_view.vm_type, 
service_offering_view.sort_key, service_offering_view.bytes_read_rate, 
service_offering_view.bytes_write_rate, service_offering_view.iops_read_rate, 
service_offering_view.iops_write_rate, service_offering_view.created, 
service_offering_view.removed, service_offering_view.domain_id, 
service_offering_view.domain_uuid, service_offering_view.domain_name, 
service_offering_view.domain_path, service_offering_view.deployment_planner 
FROM service_offering_view WHERE service_offering_view.system_use = 1  AND  AND 
service_offering_view.removed IS NULL  ORDER BY service_offering_view.sort_key 
DESC  LIMIT 0, 500
at 
com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved(GenericDaoBase.java:427)
at 
com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved(GenericDaoBase.java:361)
at com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.search(GenericDaoBase.java:345)
at 
com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchAndCount(GenericDaoBase.java:1289)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor118.invoke(Unknown Source)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
at 
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
at 
com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionContextInterceptor.invoke(TransactionContextInterceptor.java:34)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161)
at 
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy265.searchAndCount(Unknown Source)
at 
com.cloud.api.query.QueryManagerImpl.searchForServiceOfferingsInternal(QueryManagerImpl.java:2472)
at 
com.cloud.api.query.QueryManagerImpl.searchForServiceOfferings(QueryManagerImpl.java:2332)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.offering.ListServiceOfferingsCmd.execute(ListServiceOfferingsCmd.java:105)
at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:160)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:533)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:377)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handle(ApiServer.java:307)
at org.apache.http.protocol.HttpService.doService(HttpService.java:375)
at 
org.apache.http.protocol.HttpService.handleRequest(HttpService.java:290)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer$WorkerTask.runInContext(ApiServer.java:991)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:49)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:56)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:103)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:53)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:46)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:74

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Jessica Wang]

congrats, Mike


-Original Message-
From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 8:21 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he
has accepted.

Join me in congratulating Mike!

-The CloudStack PMC

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Ian Duffy]

Congratulations Mike!


On 4 February 2014 18:02, Jessica Wang  wrote:

> congrats, Mike
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 8:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski
>
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he
> has accepted.
>
> Join me in congratulating Mike!
>
> -The CloudStack PMC
>

Re: Run In memory event bus by default

[Chiradeep Vittal]

Do you mean, "can we start it by default"?
Does it work for clustered management servers?

On 2/3/14 11:25 AM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:

>I see that in memory event bus got checked in recently. I understand that
>its a plugin, but can we not start it by default ?
>It would help different components (for example - monitoring system,
>usage etc.) within CS to subscribe to events and take some useful action
>based on them if they could assume that some event bus were running by
>default.
>
>Thanks,
>-Nitin

RE: AWS EC2 Compatibility Interface

[Prachi Damle]

Hi Ian,

For EC2 REST authentication you do not need to use the script 
cloudstack-aws-api-register - the script is useful for SOAP only to register 
the certificate.
For REST you just need the keys that you can obtain by logging in to CloudStack 
UI as a root admin and generate the signature for the API call as you have 
mentioned.

This will provide some information on how to make the call using Boto and other 
tools  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30736866

Prachi

-Original Message-
From: Ian Duffy [mailto:i...@ianduffy.ie] 
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 10:55 PM
To: CloudStack Dev
Cc: Sebastien Goasguen
Subject: AWS EC2 Compatibility Interface

Hi Guys,

Question for you about the authentication of users using the EC2 REST Servlet 
exposed by the AWSAPI.

From what I understand, an EC2 REST client will make a request to the servlet 
with their Cloudstack API key, a HMAC Signature for the EC2 request and other 
parameters such as the action, a timestamp, possible action parameters etc. 
Since the Cloudstack API uses different parameters we cannot reuse the 
signature, introducing the requirement for the one time AWS API User 
Registration.

From briefly looking at the EC2 Compatibility Interface layer I understand the 
flow to be as follows:

1) Get all the parameters for the EC2 API request.
2) Look up the users API Key in the compatibility Interface layer database get 
their secret key
3) Verify signature by attempting to re-encode the parameters excluding the 
signature using the API Key and the secret key, if passed continue to process 
request.

Is this correct or am I missing something?

As a personal preference do you prefer hitting the API call SetUserKeys or 
using the script cloudstack-aws-api-register to register users within the 
database?

Thanks,
Ian

Re: Cloudstack deployment

[Victor Rodionov]

Hi, vhd-util already installed. I try this template, but it sill not
working.


2014-02-03 Mike Tutkowski :

> Additionally you should probably be using this system template:
>
>
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Check out section 4.5.3.3:
> >
> >
> >
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and place in
> >> /opt/cloud/bin.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > *(tm)*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>

Re: Cloudstack deployment

[Pierre-Luc Dion]

Got this type of issue with previous Cloudstack version, turn out that the
LABEL of Networks in Cloudstack did not match those define in XenServer.
Could it be the problem here ?

Also, if you applied xenserver hotfixes after adding xenserver to your
cloudstack, the hotfix might have replace some script on the xenserver ,
refer to:
https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Release_Notes/upgrade-instructions.html#upgrade-from-4.0-to-4.1
3.2. Upgrade from 3.0.x to 4.2.0   18-G



Pierre-Luc Dion
Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect
514-447-3456, 1101
- - -

*CloudOps*420 rue Guy
Montréal QC  H3J 1S6
www.cloudops.com
@CloudOps_


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote:

> Hi, vhd-util already installed. I try this template, but it sill not
> working.
>
>
> 2014-02-03 Mike Tutkowski :
>
> > Additionally you should probably be using this system template:
> >
> >
> >
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Check out section 4.5.3.3:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and place
> in
> > >> /opt/cloud/bin.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
> >
>

Re: listServiceOfferings fails when executed with systemvmtype parameter

[Wei ZHOU]

It looks because of commit be5e5cc6415239b5261f6bc05671f5f4454c94ca

diff --git a/server/src/com/cloud/api/query/vo/ServiceOfferingJoinVO.java
b/server/src/com/cloud/api/query/vo/ServiceOfferingJoinVO.java
index cfcc9b7..06b9e6b 100644
--- a/server/src/com/cloud/api/query/vo/ServiceOfferingJoinVO.java
+++ b/server/src/com/cloud/api/query/vo/ServiceOfferingJoinVO.java
@@ -82,10 +82,10 @@ public class ServiceOfferingJoinVO extends BaseViewVO
implements InternalIdentit
 private String hostTag;

 @Column(name = "default_use")
-private boolean default_use;
+private boolean defaultUse;

 @Column(name = "vm_type")
-private String vm_type;
+private String vmType;



2014-02-04 Alena Prokharchyk :

> Does anyone experience the same type of issue  - listServiceOffering with
> systemvmtype parameter fails with the DB exception? Whoever modified
> serviceofferingview and diskofferingview in 43-44.sql upgrade script, can
> you pls take a look?
>
>
>
> localhost:8096/?command=listServiceOfferings&issystem=true&systemvmtype=domainrouter
>
> ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (ApiServer-5:ctx-a08cd417 ctx-87002911) unhandled
> exception executing api command: listServiceOfferings
> com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Caught:
> com.mysql.jdbc.JDBC4PreparedStatement@3f2bba67: SELECT
> service_offering_view.id, service_offering_view.uuid,
> service_offering_view.name, service_offering_view.display_text,
> service_offering_view.tags, service_offering_view.use_local_storage,
> service_offering_view.system_use, service_offering_view.cpu,
> service_offering_view.speed, service_offering_view.ram_size,
> service_offering_view.nw_rate, service_offering_view.mc_rate,
> service_offering_view.ha_enabled, service_offering_view.limit_cpu_use,
> service_offering_view.is_volatile, service_offering_view.host_tag,
> service_offering_view.default_use, service_offering_view.vm_type,
> service_offering_view.sort_key, service_offering_view.bytes_read_rate,
> service_offering_view.bytes_write_rate,
> service_offering_view.iops_read_rate,
> service_offering_view.iops_write_rate, service_offering_view.created,
> service_offering_view.removed, service_offering_view.domain_id,
> service_offering_view.domain_uuid, service_offering_view.domain_name,
> service_offering_view.domain_path, service_offering_view.deployment_planner
> FROM service_offering_view WHERE service_offering_view.system_use = 1  AND
>  AND service_offering_view.removed IS NULL  ORDER BY
> service_offering_view.sort_key DESC  LIMIT 0, 500
> at
> com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved(GenericDaoBase.java:427)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchIncludingRemoved(GenericDaoBase.java:361)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.search(GenericDaoBase.java:345)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.db.GenericDaoBase.searchAndCount(GenericDaoBase.java:1289)
> at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor118.invoke(Unknown Source)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:606)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:317)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:183)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:150)
> at
> com.cloud.utils.db.TransactionContextInterceptor.invoke(TransactionContextInterceptor.java:34)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:161)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:91)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:172)
> at
> org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:204)
> at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy265.searchAndCount(Unknown Source)
> at
> com.cloud.api.query.QueryManagerImpl.searchForServiceOfferingsInternal(QueryManagerImpl.java:2472)
> at
> com.cloud.api.query.QueryManagerImpl.searchForServiceOfferings(QueryManagerImpl.java:2332)
> at
> org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.offering.ListServiceOfferingsCmd.execute(ListServiceOfferingsCmd.java:105)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:160)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:533)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:377)
> at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handle(ApiServer.java:307)
> at
> org.apache.http.protocol.HttpService.doService(HttpService.java:375)
> at
> org.apache.http.protocol.HttpService.handleRequest(HttpService.java:290)
> at
> com.cloud.api.ApiServer$WorkerTask.runInCo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Sebastien Goasguen]

well done,

On Feb 4, 2014, at 1:06 PM, Ian Duffy  wrote:

> Congratulations Mike!
> 
> 
> On 4 February 2014 18:02, Jessica Wang  wrote:
> 
>> congrats, Mike
>> 
>> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 8:21 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski
>> 
>> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
>> Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he
>> has accepted.
>> 
>> Join me in congratulating Mike!
>> 
>> -The CloudStack PMC
>> 

Re: Cloudstack deployment

[Mike Tutkowski]

Is vhd-util in /opt/cloud/bin (as opposed to /opt/xensource/bin)? The
location was changed (in 4.3), I believe.


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote:

> Hi, vhd-util already installed. I try this template, but it sill not
> working.
>
>
> 2014-02-03 Mike Tutkowski :
>
> > Additionally you should probably be using this system template:
> >
> >
> >
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Check out section 4.5.3.3:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and place
> in
> > >> /opt/cloud/bin.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: Review Request 17684: Do not initialize contrail plugin component functionality like db sync, network offerring creation when contrail is not installed

[Sheng Yang]

---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/17684/#review33636
---

Ship it!


Applied to MASTER.

Thanks.

- Sheng Yang


On Feb. 4, 2014, 12:46 a.m., Suresh Balineni wrote:
> 
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/17684/
> ---
> 
> (Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 12:46 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack.
> 
> 
> Repository: cloudstack-git
> 
> 
> Description
> ---
> 
> When contrail networking is not installed, do not initialize contrail CS 
> plugin components.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -
> 
>   
> plugins/network-elements/juniper-contrail/src/org/apache/cloudstack/network/contrail/management/ContrailManagerImpl.java
>  616a8c5 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17684/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> ---
> 
> Verified locally.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Suresh Balineni
> 
>

RE: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Animesh Chaturvedi]

Congrats Mike

> -Original Message-
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 8:21 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski
> 
> The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has
> accepted.
> 
> Join me in congratulating Mike!
> 
> -The CloudStack PMC

Re: Run In memory event bus by default

[Nitin Mehta]

Please find my answers inline.

On 04/02/14 11:04 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" 
wrote:

>Do you mean, "can we start it by default"?

Yes.

>Does it work for clustered management servers?

Probably Murali who is the author can better answer this.
But for my use case where I want to listen to the action events, its fine
to subscribe in all the instances of MS and take appropriate action.


>
>On 2/3/14 11:25 AM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:
>
>>I see that in memory event bus got checked in recently. I understand that
>>its a plugin, but can we not start it by default ?
>>It would help different components (for example - monitoring system,
>>usage etc.) within CS to subscribe to events and take some useful action
>>based on them if they could assume that some event bus were running by
>>default.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-Nitin
>

Re: Cloudstack deployment

[Victor Rodionov]

yes, it's there, in /opt/cloud/bin


2014-02-04 Mike Tutkowski :

> Is vhd-util in /opt/cloud/bin (as opposed to /opt/xensource/bin)? The
> location was changed (in 4.3), I believe.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Victor Rodionov  >wrote:
>
> > Hi, vhd-util already installed. I try this template, but it sill not
> > working.
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-03 Mike Tutkowski :
> >
> > > Additionally you should probably be using this system template:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Check out section 4.5.3.3:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and place
> > in
> > > >> /opt/cloud/bin.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > *(tm)*
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>

Re: Cloudstack deployment

[Mike Tutkowski]

OK, that all looks good then.

Unfortunately that was all I had to recommend with regards to this issue.

Maybe one of the XenServer people could chime in.

Also, Pierre-Luc had an idea.


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote:

> yes, it's there, in /opt/cloud/bin
>
>
> 2014-02-04 Mike Tutkowski :
>
> > Is vhd-util in /opt/cloud/bin (as opposed to /opt/xensource/bin)? The
> > location was changed (in 4.3), I believe.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Victor Rodionov  > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, vhd-util already installed. I try this template, but it sill not
> > > working.
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-02-03 Mike Tutkowski :
> > >
> > > > Additionally you should probably be using this system template:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Check out section 4.5.3.3:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and
> place
> > > in
> > > > >> /opt/cloud/bin.
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > cloud
> > > > *(tm)*
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: Cloudstack deployment

[Victor Rodionov]

ok, is there any documents describing development process for cloudstack?


2014-02-04 Mike Tutkowski :

> OK, that all looks good then.
>
> Unfortunately that was all I had to recommend with regards to this issue.
>
> Maybe one of the XenServer people could chime in.
>
> Also, Pierre-Luc had an idea.
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Victor Rodionov  >wrote:
>
> > yes, it's there, in /opt/cloud/bin
> >
> >
> > 2014-02-04 Mike Tutkowski :
> >
> > > Is vhd-util in /opt/cloud/bin (as opposed to /opt/xensource/bin)? The
> > > location was changed (in 4.3), I believe.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Victor Rodionov  > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi, vhd-util already installed. I try this template, but it sill not
> > > > working.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2014-02-03 Mike Tutkowski :
> > > >
> > > > > Additionally you should probably be using this system template:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Check out section 4.5.3.3:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and
> > place
> > > > in
> > > > > >> /opt/cloud/bin.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > cloud
> > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > cloud
> > > *(tm)*
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Mike Tutkowski*
> *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> o: 303.746.7302
> Advancing the way the world uses the
> cloud
> *(tm)*
>

Re: Cloudstack deployment

[Mike Tutkowski]

I would recommend this as a starting point:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Development+101


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Victor Rodionov wrote:

> ok, is there any documents describing development process for cloudstack?
>
>
> 2014-02-04 Mike Tutkowski :
>
> > OK, that all looks good then.
> >
> > Unfortunately that was all I had to recommend with regards to this issue.
> >
> > Maybe one of the XenServer people could chime in.
> >
> > Also, Pierre-Luc had an idea.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 2:42 PM, Victor Rodionov  > >wrote:
> >
> > > yes, it's there, in /opt/cloud/bin
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014-02-04 Mike Tutkowski :
> > >
> > > > Is vhd-util in /opt/cloud/bin (as opposed to /opt/xensource/bin)? The
> > > > location was changed (in 4.3), I believe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Victor Rodionov <
> vito.or...@gmail.com
> > > > >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi, vhd-util already installed. I try this template, but it sill
> not
> > > > > working.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 2014-02-03 Mike Tutkowski :
> > > > >
> > > > > > Additionally you should probably be using this system template:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://download.cloud.com/templates/4.3/systemvm64template-2014-01-14-master-xen.vhd.bz2
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Check out section 4.5.3.3:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html#management-server-install
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Mike Tutkowski <
> > > > > > > mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> You are likely missing vhd-util. It needs to be downloaded and
> > > place
> > > > > in
> > > > > > >> /opt/cloud/bin.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the cloud<
> > > > > > http://solidfire.com/solution/overview/?video=play>
> > > > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > > > cloud
> > > > > > *(tm)*
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > > > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > > > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > > > o: 303.746.7302
> > > > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > > > cloud
> > > > *(tm)*
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Mike Tutkowski*
> > *Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
> > e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
> > o: 303.746.7302
> > Advancing the way the world uses the
> > cloud
> > *(tm)*
> >
>



-- 
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing the way the world uses the
cloud
*(tm)*

Re: CLVM volumes shown under the wrong hypervisor type (OVM)

[Nux!]

On 19.01.2014 18:00, Nux! wrote:

Hi,

Opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-5907 for this.

There doesn't seem to be any lack of functionality with these
volumes, but it seems wrong to display OVM there instead of KVM and
may cause other issues in the future.


Does anyone have any idea why this is happening?

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

[chris snow]

The xapi issue is fixed now.

Next on the list:

 - The mysql root passwordless access is broken.
 - Add additional network card.


On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:16 PM, chris snow  wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback Sebastien, it's much appreciated.
>
> I'll investigate in more detail over the next few days...
>
> On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:25 PM, chris snow  wrote:
>>>
 I finally got the packer built devcloud box to boot with vagrant, but
 running 'xe vm-list' in it results in:

 Error: Connection refused (calling connect )

 I'm going to do some more investigation, but could take a while as I
 get to learn xen.

 To make things easy while working on this I've created a github project 
 here [2]

>>>
>>> I cloned it, the packer builds works and the vagrant export as well.
>>> I was able to vagrant up/ssh.
>>>
>>> I noticed couple things.
>>>
>>> 1-the Xen setup. Check Rohit's blog http://bhaisaab.org he has a section on 
>>> DIY Devcloud, where he shows how to setup Xen, namely xapi toolstack and 
>>> creating a echo plugin.I think that's what you are missing, you can 
>>> probably add this to your posinstall script
>>>
>>> 2-We switched master to java 7, so you should switch to openjdk-7
>>>
>>> 3- you might be missing a mysql-python-connector package and you should 
>>> setup the mysql password as null (for dev).
>>>
>>
>> One more. It looks like there is only one interface (NAT), probably need to 
>> play with the pressed.cfg to add a host only interface:
>> https://github.com/snowch/devcloud/blob/master/http/preseed.cfg
>>
>>> This is looking quite nice :)
>>>
 I've added the problem above as an issue on github.

 ---
 [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/XenServer/VirtualBox#Installing_XCP
 [2] https://github.com/snowch/devcloud

 On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Rohit Yadav  
 wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Sebastien Goasguen  
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:57 PM, chris snow  wrote:
>>
>>> I have started thinking about some options:
>>>
>>> 1)  use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting 
>>> point
>>> 2) create devcloud3 from scratch
>>> 3) start with an existing packer definition (e.g. [1])
>>>
>>> Do you have a view on which option may be most suitable?
>>>
>>
>> My view would be to start from scratch but of course looking at what has 
>> been done.
>>
>> In an ideal world, I would love to see a packer/vagrant file that would 
>> do:
>>
>> -Ubuntu and CentOS
>> -Xen and KVM
>>
>> That way we can decide on what to build. Of course there might be issues 
>> due to the PV/HVM support in vbox and the OS chosen.
>> I don't recall what the issue was that made Rohit use Debian (but see 
>> http://bhaisaab.org/logs/devcloud/), but ideally it would be good to use 
>> stock ubuntu 12.04 or 13.04
>
> DevCloud is just an appliance that facilitates a virtual host
> (hypervisor) for development with CloudStack. So, I chose Debian
> because well it's the best in terms of packages, stability, security
> and is usually rock solid. Ubuntu at the time had a networking issue
> that did not let me use xenbr0 for use over host-only network, I did
> not invest much time on it but rather switched to Debian.
>
> I suggest we stick to Debian as it would be least painful for anyone
> IMO and the problem we're trying to solve is to enable developers have
> a robust (possibly multi-vm) hypervisor host in box (vm) over a
> desktop virtualization platform (virtualbox, kvm etc.)
>
> (IMHO -- I wonder if you've tried latest rock-solid Fedora 20, Ubuntu
> should have been least recommended distro by now don't use it please).
>
>> I list 13.04 because there seems to be an issue with libvirt in 12.04 in 
>> the case that you want ceph 
>> (http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-cloudstack/). Of course ceph on a 
>> single node does not make sense, but for a devcloud3 setup we could 
>> imagine setting up ceph in it and use it as primary storage.
>
> Why not build libvirt version we want? In case we want to stay updated
> I can help you with Fedora 20 based base or Arch based base for
> devcloud. I've been using Fedora for some months now and I guess if
> someone want latest and greatest but want to avoid a lot of sysadmin
> work as with Arch Linux just go with Fedora. Linux users (new and old)
> have more or less been inclined to Debian because yum-based distros
> were in really bad shape few years ago and that's when like others I
> shifted to using Ubuntu. But it's not the case anymore and Ubuntu has
> tons of problems now and rpm-based distros deserver one shot.
>

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #227

[jenkins]

See 

Changes:

[min.chen] CLOUDSTACK-6027:CreateVolume from snapshot is failing with S3 on 
Vmware.

--
[...truncated 1664 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-engine-storage-snapshot ---
[INFO] Compiling 8 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-engine-storage-snapshot ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] Copying 2 resources
[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-storage-snapshot ---
[INFO] Compiling 2 source files to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default) @ 
cloud-engine-storage-snapshot ---
[INFO] Nothing to compile - all classes are up to date
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-engine-storage-snapshot ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---
Running src.SnapshotDataFactoryTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.072 sec
Running src.VMSnapshotStrategyTest
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger 
(org.springframework.test.context.junit4.SpringJUnit4ClassRunner).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig for more 
info.
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.781 sec

Results :

Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine API 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-network 
---
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 
 (includes = 
[target, dist], excludes = [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-checkstyle-plugin:2.11:check (cloudstack-checkstyle) @ 
cloud-engine-network ---
[INFO] Starting audit...
Audit done.

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.3:process (default) @ 
cloud-engine-network ---
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:resources (default-resources) @ 
cloud-engine-network ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) @ 
cloud-engine-network ---
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to 

[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.5:testResources (default-testResources) @ 
cloud-engine-network ---
[debug] execute contextualize
[INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
[INFO] skip non existing resourceDirectory 

[INFO] Copying 3 resources
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ 
cloud-engine-network ---
[INFO] No sources to compile
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-surefire-plugin:2.12:test (default-test) @ 
cloud-engine-network ---
[INFO] Surefire report directory: 


---
 T E S T S
---

Results :

Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] Building Apache CloudStack Cloud Engine Service 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] 
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.5:clean (default-clean) @ cloud-engine-service 
---
[INFO] Deleting 
 
(includes = [**/*], excludes = [])
[INFO] Deleting 

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #228

[jenkins]

See 

CloudStack 4.2 | Xen Server 6.2

[Maurice Lawler]

Is Xen Server 6.2 supported by Cloudstack 4.2 ? If so, I am not finding 
a supp pack listed here: 
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Installation_Guide/citrix-xenserver-installation.html#system-requirements-xenserver-hosts


I saw some chatter about it being supported by 4.2 -- but that's where 
my trail ended.


Thanks,
Maurice

RE: Run In memory event bus by default

[Prachi Damle]

Murali,

Also we already have a MessageBus being used at couple of places to publish 
messages to other components about certain scenario.
e.g: When reserved capacity for a VM that is stopped for time greater than 
configured threshold is freed up, CapacityManager publishes a message that is 
being subscribed to by the DeploymentPlanningManager.

How do we differentiate between the MessageBus Vs EventBus usecases, when 
should we use one Vs the other? 

Prachi

-Original Message-
From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 1:34 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Murali Reddy
Subject: Re: Run In memory event bus by default

Please find my answers inline.

On 04/02/14 11:04 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" 
wrote:

>Do you mean, "can we start it by default"?

Yes.

>Does it work for clustered management servers?

Probably Murali who is the author can better answer this.
But for my use case where I want to listen to the action events, its fine to 
subscribe in all the instances of MS and take appropriate action.


>
>On 2/3/14 11:25 AM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:
>
>>I see that in memory event bus got checked in recently. I understand 
>>that its a plugin, but can we not start it by default ?
>>It would help different components (for example - monitoring system, 
>>usage etc.) within CS to subscribe to events and take some useful 
>>action based on them if they could assume that some event bus were 
>>running by default.
>>
>>Thanks,
>>-Nitin
>

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski

[Ahmad Emneina]

whoa, great news. Congrats Mike!


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com> wrote:

> Congrats Mike
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chipchild...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 8:21 AM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> > Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Member: Mike Tutkowski
> >
> > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked
> > Mike Tutkowski to join the PMC and we are pleased to announce that he has
> > accepted.
> >
> > Join me in congratulating Mike!
> >
> > -The CloudStack PMC
>

CloudStack usage calculation doesn't work?

[Indra Pramana]

Hi,

When I installed CloudStack, I also installed the CloudStack usage server
and the service seems to be running fine, I can stop and start the service
and the status is running.

===
# service cloudstack-usage restart
 * Stopping CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage[
OK ]
 * Starting CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage[
OK ]
# service cloudstack-usage status
 * cloudstack-usage is running

I also have configured the usage server based on the documentation at this
URL:

https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/configure-usage-server.html

===
enable.usage.server = true
usage.aggregation.timezone = GMT
usage.execution.timezone = GMT
usage.stats.job.aggregation.range = 1440
usage.stats.job.exec.time = 00:15
===

However, it seems that the usage server doesn't work as expected. I don't
see anything on the cloud_usage database, and the content of
/var/log/cloudstack/usage is also empty, so I can't find any logs
pertaining to the usage server.

Anything I might have missed out?

Thank you.

Re: Run In memory event bus by default

[Murali Reddy]

On 05/02/14 3:04 AM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:

>Please find my answers inline.
>
>On 04/02/14 11:04 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" 
>wrote:
>
>>Do you mean, "can we start it by default"?
>
>Yes.

We can enable it by default, we just have to add spring config file. There
are no CloudStack components that will need this now, so I did not make it
default. If there is a need we can enable it.

>
>>Does it work for clustered management servers?

No it does not work for clustered management servers, so both publisher
and subscriber of the events need to be running in same management server.
But the current RabbitMQ based event bus plug-in can be used for clustered
management server setup.

>
>Probably Murali who is the author can better answer this.
>But for my use case where I want to listen to the action events, its fine
>to subscribe in all the instances of MS and take appropriate action.
>
>
>>
>>On 2/3/14 11:25 AM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:
>>
>>>I see that in memory event bus got checked in recently. I understand
>>>that
>>>its a plugin, but can we not start it by default ?
>>>It would help different components (for example - monitoring system,
>>>usage etc.) within CS to subscribe to events and take some useful action
>>>based on them if they could assume that some event bus were running by
>>>default.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>-Nitin
>>
>
>

Re: Run In memory event bus by default

[Murali Reddy]

On 05/02/14 6:14 AM, "Prachi Damle"  wrote:

>Murali,
>
>Also we already have a MessageBus being used at couple of places to
>publish messages to other components about certain scenario.
>e.g: When reserved capacity for a VM that is stopped for time greater
>than configured threshold is freed up, CapacityManager publishes a
>message that is being subscribed to by the DeploymentPlanningManager.
>
>How do we differentiate between the MessageBus Vs EventBus usecases, when
>should we use one Vs the other?

Both are designed with different goals. Please see thread [1]. MessageBus
acts as generic transport abstraction to build IPC between the components.
Event bus has specific use case of enabling CloudStack components or
external system to publish-subscribe CloudStack events.

I guess which one to use depends on the use case. If some functionality
can be achieved just by consuming action/usage/sate change/alert events
generated then event bus should be good enough.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/cebk4cyvbdufyrkr

>
>Prachi
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Nitin Mehta [mailto:nitin.me...@citrix.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 1:34 PM
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Cc: Murali Reddy
>Subject: Re: Run In memory event bus by default
>
>Please find my answers inline.
>
>On 04/02/14 11:04 AM, "Chiradeep Vittal" 
>wrote:
>
>>Do you mean, "can we start it by default"?
>
>Yes.
>
>>Does it work for clustered management servers?
>
>Probably Murali who is the author can better answer this.
>But for my use case where I want to listen to the action events, its fine
>to subscribe in all the instances of MS and take appropriate action.
>
>
>>
>>On 2/3/14 11:25 AM, "Nitin Mehta"  wrote:
>>
>>>I see that in memory event bus got checked in recently. I understand
>>>that its a plugin, but can we not start it by default ?
>>>It would help different components (for example - monitoring system,
>>>usage etc.) within CS to subscribe to events and take some useful
>>>action based on them if they could assume that some event bus were
>>>running by default.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>-Nitin
>>
>
>

Re: cloudstack-agent on ubuntu

[Gaurav Aradhye]

welcome :)

Regards,
Gaurav


On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:53 AM, Anirban Chakraborty wrote:

> Hi Gaurav,
>
> Thanks for the pointer. It was indeed cloud-agent, instead of
> cloudstack-agent.
>
> Anirban
>
> On Feb 2, 2014, at 10:39 PM, Gaurav Aradhye 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Anirban,
> >
> > Are you sure you have used "apt-get install cloudstack-agent" and not
> > "apt-get install cloud-agent". I had encountered the same issue and then
> > realized I had installed an outdated version of the agent. The link
> > displayed in google search results takes you to installation guide of
> > 4.0.2. If you are installing 4.2.1 then you need to change the command to
> > "cloudstack-agent".
> >
> > I hope that helps.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Gaurav
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Anirban Chakraborty <
> abc...@juniper.net>wrote:
> >
> >> I have got past the install issue. However, when I am trying to add a
> KVM
> >> host to the management server, I see following message in the
> >> management-server.log:
> >>
> >> 
> >> 2014-01-31 01:15:42,895 DEBUG [c.c.u.s.SSHCmdHelper]
> >> (catalina-exec-5:ctx-1569065b ctx-65347efa) cloudstack-setup-agent  -m
> >> 10.84.13.16 -z 2 -p 2 -c 2 -g 08fae0c3-30f0-321c-ba06-6960f216e08d -a
> >> --pubNic=cloudbr0 --prvNic=cloudbr0 --guestNic=cloudbr0 output:bash:
> >> cloudstack-setup-agent: command not found
> >> 
> >>
> >> As I look at the KVM host, I can't find any cloudstack-setup-agent,
> >> instead there is /usr/bin/cloud-setup-agent (as mentioned in
> >>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/cloudstack-issues/201303.mbox/%3CJIRA.12637884.1363749652274.49725.1364232315544@arcas%3E
> >> )
> >>
> >> Should I rename cloud-setup-agent to cloudstack-setup-agent? Is it a bug
> >> on ubuntu ? I see
> >> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.discoverer.LibVirtServerDiscoverer.java has a
> hard
> >> coded name for the script:
> >> ---
> >> SSHCmdHelper.sshExecuteCmd(sshConnection, "cloudstack-setup-agent " +
> >> parameters, 3);
> >> --
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Anirban
> >>
> >>
> >> On Jan 30, 2014, at 12:51 AM, Wei ZHOU  wrote:
> >>
> >>> ethtool is used
> >>> in
> >>
> plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
> >>> so this package is required in cloudstack-agent installation.
> >>> If you use "dpkg -i" to install the deb packages and meet error
> >>> about dependencies, you can use "apt-get install" or "apt-get install
> >>> ethtool" to fix it.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2014-01-29 Anirban Chakraborty 
> >>>
>  Hi All,
> 
>  I am trying to install cloudstack-agent on ubuntu 12.04 and it is
> >> failing
>  with openjdk-6-jre dependency. Following is the error message:
>  
>  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  cloudstack-agent : Depends: openjdk-6-jre but it is not installable or
> openjdk-7-jre but it is not going to be
>  installed
>    Depends: cloudstack-common (= 4.2.1) but it is not
>  going to be installed
>    Depends: ethtool but it is not installable
>  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
>  
>  Has any one seen this, and if so, how do I get around it? Thanks much.
> 
>  Anirban Chakraborty
> 
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>

Re: CLOUDSTACK-6023: Non windows instances are created on XenServer with a vcpu-max above supported xenserver limits

[Harikrishna Patnala]

Hi,

There are xenserver docs [1][2] that suggests max VCPUs limit for Linux VMS is 
32.

[1] says that 32 VCPUs is the limitation on Linux vms and *a maximum of 16 
vCPUs are supported by *XenCenter

And this value is set in time frame of 4.2 and since then we are using this. 
to be safe I agree to set 16 max VCPU value, but may I know how this VCPU-max 
value effects the HTTP request. I could not find the reason for 32 VCPUS-max 
limit in the log

[20140204T13:52:17.346Z|error|xenserverhost1|144 inet-RPC|host.call_plugin 
R:e58e985539ab|master_connection] Received HTTP error 500 ({ method = POST; uri 
= /remote_db_access; query = [  ]; content_length = [ 315932 ]; transfer 
encoding = ; version = 1.1; cookie = [ 
pool_secret=386bbf39-8710-4d2d-f452-9725d79c2393/aa7bcda9-8ebb-0cef-bb77-c6b496c5d859/1f928d82-7a20-9117-dd30-f96c7349b16e
 ]; task = ; subtask_of = ; content-type = ; user_agent = xapi/1.9 })  



-Harikrishna




[1] Section 3.4 in 
http://support.citrix.com/servlet/KbServlet/download/32303-102-691296/guest.pdf
[2] http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX134887




On 04-Feb-2014, at 9:06 pm, Daan Hoogland  wrote:

> Hello community,
> 
> This is not the only serious bug Joris has filed today. The other one
> is quite some older and we ran into it only now because before we
> hadn't been using internal addresses in the 172.16 or 192.168 ranges.
> This one is CLOUDSTACK-6020 and may not impede the RC but I think 6023
> does. Before I cast my -1 I want to hear some more opinions on it.
> 
> regards,
> Daan
> 
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Joris van Lieshout
>  wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> Today I've submitted this bug: 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6023
>> Because this bug has stability impact on XenServer I'm mentioning it here as 
>> well. In my opinion it may impact the current vote on 4.3.
>> 
>> Thanks you
>> 
>> Kind regards,
>> Joris van Lieshout
>> 
>> 
>> Schuberg Philis
>> Boeingavenue 271
>> 1119 PD  Schiphol-Rijk
>> schubergphilis.com
>> 
>> +31 207506672
>> +31651428188
>> _
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Daan

Re: CloudStack usage calculation doesn't work?

[Wei ZHOU]

Are you working on 4.2.0?


2014-02-05 Indra Pramana :

> Hi,
>
> When I installed CloudStack, I also installed the CloudStack usage server
> and the service seems to be running fine, I can stop and start the service
> and the status is running.
>
> ===
> # service cloudstack-usage restart
>  * Stopping CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage[
> OK ]
>  * Starting CloudStack Usage Monitor cloudstack-usage[
> OK ]
> # service cloudstack-usage status
>  * cloudstack-usage is running
>
> I also have configured the usage server based on the documentation at this
> URL:
>
>
> https://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.2.0/html/Admin_Guide/configure-usage-server.html
>
> ===
> enable.usage.server = true
> usage.aggregation.timezone = GMT
> usage.execution.timezone = GMT
> usage.stats.job.aggregation.range = 1440
> usage.stats.job.exec.time = 00:15
> ===
>
> However, it seems that the usage server doesn't work as expected. I don't
> see anything on the cloud_usage database, and the content of
> /var/log/cloudstack/usage is also empty, so I can't find any logs
> pertaining to the usage server.
>
> Anything I might have missed out?
>
> Thank you.
>

Re: Devcloud 2 - veewee/Vagrant projects

[Rajani Karuturi]

Hi Chris,

I tried this today on my machine(macbook 7,1)
It took nearly 1 hr 45 min for packer build+downloads. Once that is done, when 
i did a vagrant up, saw the following mount error
[default] -- /vagrant
Failed to mount folders in Linux guest. This is usually beacuse
the "vboxsf" file system is not available. Please verify that
the guest additions are properly installed in the guest and
can work properly. The command attempted was:

mount -t vboxsf -o uid=`id -u vagrant`,gid=`getent group vagrant | cut -d: -f3` 
/vagrant /vagrant
mount -t vboxsf -o uid=`id -u vagrant`,gid=`id -g vagrant` /vagrant /vagrant

Also, ssh root@192.168.56.10 wasn’t working after it 
is up. I am however able to access it through vagrant ssh. Did the ip change?

Thanks,
~Rajani



On 05-Feb-2014, at 4:15 am, chris snow 
mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com>> wrote:

The xapi issue is fixed now.

Next on the list:

- The mysql root passwordless access is broken.
- Add additional network card.


On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:16 PM, chris snow 
mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback Sebastien, it's much appreciated.

I'll investigate in more detail over the next few days...

On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Sebastien Goasguen 
mailto:run...@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Feb 1, 2014, at 4:03 PM, Sebastien Goasguen 
mailto:run...@gmail.com>> wrote:


On Jan 31, 2014, at 12:25 PM, chris snow 
mailto:chsnow...@gmail.com>> wrote:

I finally got the packer built devcloud box to boot with vagrant, but
running 'xe vm-list' in it results in:

Error: Connection refused (calling connect )

I'm going to do some more investigation, but could take a while as I
get to learn xen.

To make things easy while working on this I've created a github project here [2]


I cloned it, the packer builds works and the vagrant export as well.
I was able to vagrant up/ssh.

I noticed couple things.

1-the Xen setup. Check Rohit's blog http://bhaisaab.org he has a section on DIY 
Devcloud, where he shows how to setup Xen, namely xapi toolstack and creating a 
echo plugin.I think that's what you are missing, you can probably add this to 
your posinstall script

2-We switched master to java 7, so you should switch to openjdk-7

3- you might be missing a mysql-python-connector package and you should setup 
the mysql password as null (for dev).


One more. It looks like there is only one interface (NAT), probably need to 
play with the pressed.cfg to add a host only interface:
https://github.com/snowch/devcloud/blob/master/http/preseed.cfg

This is looking quite nice :)

I've added the problem above as an issue on github.

---
[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/XenServer/VirtualBox#Installing_XCP
[2] https://github.com/snowch/devcloud

On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Rohit Yadav  wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:14 AM, Sebastien Goasguen  wrote:

On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:57 PM, chris snow  wrote:

I have started thinking about some options:

1)  use packer to convert the devcloud2 veewee definition as a starting point
2) create devcloud3 from scratch
3) start with an existing packer definition (e.g. [1])

Do you have a view on which option may be most suitable?


My view would be to start from scratch but of course looking at what has been 
done.

In an ideal world, I would love to see a packer/vagrant file that would do:

-Ubuntu and CentOS
-Xen and KVM

That way we can decide on what to build. Of course there might be issues due to 
the PV/HVM support in vbox and the OS chosen.
I don't recall what the issue was that made Rohit use Debian (but see 
http://bhaisaab.org/logs/devcloud/), but ideally it would be good to use stock 
ubuntu 12.04 or 13.04

DevCloud is just an appliance that facilitates a virtual host
(hypervisor) for development with CloudStack. So, I chose Debian
because well it's the best in terms of packages, stability, security
and is usually rock solid. Ubuntu at the time had a networking issue
that did not let me use xenbr0 for use over host-only network, I did
not invest much time on it but rather switched to Debian.

I suggest we stick to Debian as it would be least painful for anyone
IMO and the problem we're trying to solve is to enable developers have
a robust (possibly multi-vm) hypervisor host in box (vm) over a
desktop virtualization platform (virtualbox, kvm etc.)

(IMHO -- I wonder if you've tried latest rock-solid Fedora 20, Ubuntu
should have been least recommended distro by now don't use it please).

I list 13.04 because there seems to be an issue with libvirt in 12.04 in the 
case that you want ceph (http://ceph.com/docs/master/rbd/rbd-cloudstack/). Of 
course ceph on a single node does not make sense, but for a devcloud3 setup we 
could imagine setting up ceph in it and use it as primary storage.

Why not build libvirt version we want? In case we want to stay updated
I can help you with Fedora 20 based base or Arch based base for
devcloud. I've been using Fedora for some months now and I guess if
someone want