XFree86 4.1.0 debs for potato

2001-07-30 Thread Charl P. Botha
Thanks very much for your work on the 4.1.0 packages Branden!

I have built potato versions of Branden's 4.1.0 debs.  See
http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS
for more information on how to get them on your system.

If you would like to build these yourselves, see my HOWTO at:
http://cpbotha.net/building_xfree86_4.1.0_debs_on_potato.HOWTO

-- 
charl p. botha  | computer graphics and cad/cam 
http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/



latin2 in xfonts-* packages?

2001-07-30 Thread Piotr Roszatycki
I've noticed the xfonts-{misc,75dpi,100dpi} packages provides latin2
fonts. They are the same fonts as in my xfonts-biznet-* packages. Should I
remove my packages as outdated and replaced by main xfree86 packages?

These latin2 fonts are placed in own directory. I'm afraid they should be
placed in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/{base,75dpi,100dpi} like other fonts
listed in XF86Config. Should I report the bug?

-- 
Piotr Roszatycki, Netia Telekom S.A..''`.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   : :' :
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   `. `'
 `-



Re: latin2 in xfonts-* packages?

2001-07-30 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> I've noticed the xfonts-{misc,75dpi,100dpi} packages provides latin2
> fonts. They are the same fonts as in my xfonts-biznet-* packages. Should I
> remove my packages as outdated and replaced by main xfree86 packages?

If the fonts in xfonts-{misc,75dpi,100dpi} are suitable for Latin-2 usage,
yes.

> These latin2 fonts are placed in own directory. I'm afraid they should be
> placed in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/{base,75dpi,100dpi} like other fonts
> listed in XF86Config. Should I report the bug?

Yes.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|Damnit, we're all going to die;
Debian GNU/Linux   |let's die doing something *useful*!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Hal Clement, on comments that
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |   space exploration is dangerous


pgpGz7VNEy69z.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Horizontal timing out of range (was Re: Bug in Xgalaga?)

2001-07-30 Thread Stuart Ballard
[added the list back to the cc's of this because it's now a general
question about Xfree86, rather than a specific question about your
message. I hope you (Juliusz) don't mind - none of the content of your
reply seemed particularly private]

Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> 
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> 
> > How do you do this? With 4.0.[23] and the savage driver, the 1600x1200
> > modeline that I used to use with great success on 3.3.x now fails with
> > "hsync out of range".
> 
> That's different.  It simply means that your modeline requests an
> hsync value (not a dot clock!) that your Monitor entry claims not to
> support.

Oops - seems I misremembered the error message. This is what it actually
says:

(WW) SAVAGE(0): Mode "1600x1200" deleted (horizontal timing out of
range)

Is that the same problem, or a different one?

> No, most probably you're using a different Monitor entry than you used
> to in 3.*.

This is the XF86Config-4 version of my Monitor section. I just checked
and the old XF86Config from v3 was identical except for a lot of
comments and different identifier strings.

Section "Monitor"
Identifier   "Monitor0"
VendorName   "Monitor Vendor"
ModelName"Monitor Model"
HorizSync30-117
VertRefresh  50-160
Option   "DPMS"
Modeline "1600x1200"  162   1600 1664 1856 2160  1200 1201 1204
1250 +HSync +VSync
EndSection

(minus the obvious wordwrapping of the modeline done by my mail client)

(Actually, my *current* Xf86-4 has vertrefresh 50-70 for other reasons,
but this doesn't change the error message for the 1600x1200 modeline)

Thanks again for your help!

Stuart.



XFree86 4.1.0 debs for potato

2001-07-30 Thread Charl P. Botha

Thanks very much for your work on the 4.1.0 packages Branden!

I have built potato versions of Branden's 4.1.0 debs.  See
http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/READ.THIS
for more information on how to get them on your system.

If you would like to build these yourselves, see my HOWTO at:
http://cpbotha.net/building_xfree86_4.1.0_debs_on_potato.HOWTO

-- 
charl p. botha  | computer graphics and cad/cam 
http://cpbotha.net/ | http://www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




latin2 in xfonts-* packages?

2001-07-30 Thread Piotr Roszatycki

I've noticed the xfonts-{misc,75dpi,100dpi} packages provides latin2
fonts. They are the same fonts as in my xfonts-biznet-* packages. Should I
remove my packages as outdated and replaced by main xfree86 packages?

These latin2 fonts are placed in own directory. I'm afraid they should be
placed in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/{base,75dpi,100dpi} like other fonts
listed in XF86Config. Should I report the bug?

-- 
Piotr Roszatycki, Netia Telekom S.A..''`.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   : :' :
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   `. `'
 `-


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: latin2 in xfonts-* packages?

2001-07-30 Thread Branden Robinson

On Mon, Jul 30, 2001 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Piotr Roszatycki wrote:
> I've noticed the xfonts-{misc,75dpi,100dpi} packages provides latin2
> fonts. They are the same fonts as in my xfonts-biznet-* packages. Should I
> remove my packages as outdated and replaced by main xfree86 packages?

If the fonts in xfonts-{misc,75dpi,100dpi} are suitable for Latin-2 usage,
yes.

> These latin2 fonts are placed in own directory. I'm afraid they should be
> placed in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/{base,75dpi,100dpi} like other fonts
> listed in XF86Config. Should I report the bug?

Yes.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|Damnit, we're all going to die;
Debian GNU/Linux   |let's die doing something *useful*!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |-- Hal Clement, on comments that
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |   space exploration is dangerous

 PGP signature


Horizontal timing out of range (was Re: Bug in Xgalaga?)

2001-07-30 Thread Stuart Ballard

[added the list back to the cc's of this because it's now a general
question about Xfree86, rather than a specific question about your
message. I hope you (Juliusz) don't mind - none of the content of your
reply seemed particularly private]

Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> 
> Stuart Ballard wrote:
> 
> > How do you do this? With 4.0.[23] and the savage driver, the 1600x1200
> > modeline that I used to use with great success on 3.3.x now fails with
> > "hsync out of range".
> 
> That's different.  It simply means that your modeline requests an
> hsync value (not a dot clock!) that your Monitor entry claims not to
> support.

Oops - seems I misremembered the error message. This is what it actually
says:

(WW) SAVAGE(0): Mode "1600x1200" deleted (horizontal timing out of
range)

Is that the same problem, or a different one?

> No, most probably you're using a different Monitor entry than you used
> to in 3.*.

This is the XF86Config-4 version of my Monitor section. I just checked
and the old XF86Config from v3 was identical except for a lot of
comments and different identifier strings.

Section "Monitor"
Identifier   "Monitor0"
VendorName   "Monitor Vendor"
ModelName"Monitor Model"
HorizSync30-117
VertRefresh  50-160
Option   "DPMS"
Modeline "1600x1200"  162   1600 1664 1856 2160  1200 1201 1204
1250 +HSync +VSync
EndSection

(minus the obvious wordwrapping of the modeline done by my mail client)

(Actually, my *current* Xf86-4 has vertrefresh 50-70 for other reasons,
but this doesn't change the error message for the 1600x1200 modeline)

Thanks again for your help!

Stuart.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]