Bug#721283: [www.debian.org] Please mention Bytemark's donation
On 08/05/14 at 22:56 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > [ CCing leader@ as I think its a rather important thing to discuss ] > > Hi, > > I object against adding new (and incomplete stuff) to a completely outdated > page. We have a lot of people sponsoring hardware, parts, or monkey for > hardware, including some who did never ever ask for a press release - or don't > even want to have one and maybe don't want to be mentioned at all. > > Adding bytemark to https://www.debian.org/misc/equipment_donations looks weird > to all those who sponsored stuff and who would like to be there, and maybe > even > weird to bytemark as they are listed with companies who donated a 20gb drive > or > similar things years ago (which was EXPENSIVE back at that time). > > That page needs to go away, or it needs to be kept uptodate by people who > actually know who sponsored what and who wants/should be mentioned (and thats > not the www team, sorry :)) - either the hardware donations people and/or the > Auditors. > > Actually I think we should not publish single donations on the web page at > all, > at least not in this form. If there was a press release its in the archive, > but > keeping track of all donations is a hard task and prone to problems and > errors, > and having a general "thank you" page is at least easier to maintain until we > found a proper way to keep track of > who-sponsored-what-and-wants-to-be-published-how. Hi, I agree with you that some improvement is needed about how we manage and advertise donations. There are plans to do that, but this will likely take time. I don't think that we should stop advertising donations in the meantime. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140510074605.ga22...@xanadu.blop.info
donations and paypal
(resending to -www@, #681501 is now archived) Hi, I was asked to look into the question of whether (and how) we should list Paypal on https://www.debian.org/donations. I've gone through various discussions about Paypal, including the one on debconf-team (http://lists.debconf.org/lurker/message/20141010.131258.9c56bd7d.en.html). I agree that Paypal is far from a perfect service, for several reasons. We should clearly continue to offer alternative options for donations. However, I don't think that the known problems with Paypal are bad enough to surpass the the benefits of accepting donations via Paypal. Also, TTBOMK, the problems with Paypal are unrelated to Debian's main goals: for example, it doesn't require the use of proprietary software (even javascript). Paypal has also been used successfully already by Debian, e.g. for the OPW fundraising efforts. So I think that Paypal should be listed similarly to other donations: - not hidden in an 'other' section but listed directly similarly to Click & Pledge; - provided with a form, not just a link, if auditors decide it's suitable and useful; - if auditors decide it is useful, listed at the top of the page for donations in Euros, if we can't find a better alternative. Of course, as a good practice, Paypal should not be used for long-term storage of Debian funds. This would limit problems in case of freeze of our accounts. If one can find a good, factual document that explains the various concerns about Paypal, it could be mentioned (in a footnote, for example). There's http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PayPal#Criticism, but it's mostly focused on the problem of automated freezings of accounts. However, it should be mentioned as an informational message that some people have expressed concerns about Paypal, not as a message that Debian discourages the use of Paypal. As I know that some members of the www team have strong opinions about this topic, I'd like to clarify that I am not asking them to implement those changes themselves. However, I am asking them to not reject a suitable patch, and to not revert a change that would implement this. Thanks, Lucas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: donations and paypal
Hi David, On 16/11/14 at 18:31 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > Hi, > > Le 16/11/2014 15:23, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > (resending to -www@, #681501 is now archived) > > Resending to project, and setting follow-up-to accordingly: this is > about the public image of the project, it’s not limited to the point of > view and opinions of the people currently behind the website IMHO. I understand you care very deeply about this issue. However, this is not a reason to bounce my email from -www@ to -project@ without making it clear that you did that (by forwarding it instead of bouncing it, for example). Now, given that you want to express disagreement about my decision, I think that you should explain why _you_ think that: (1) Debian should not list paypal; (2) This is a serious enough issue to override auditors, who are normally in charge of managing how Debian receives donations; (3) What Debian should do instead, and how you are willing to help. Lucas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: donations and paypal
On 17/11/14 at 16:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > However, this is not a reason to bounce my email from -www@ to -project@ > > without making it clear that you did that (by forwarding it instead of > > bouncing it, for example). > > FTR, I was the one who bounced the message, not David. Ah, then I apologize for blaming David. But given that you chose to move this discussion to -project@, I'd like to extend to you the same questions I asked to David. As I already wrote, I totally agree that Paypal is far from perfect, and, if there were some FLOSS-friendly payment processors available, I would love to see Debian advertise and use them. There's a simple path to scratch that itch: help design FLOSS-friendly payment processors, and help our TOs support them. However, in the meantime, I don't think that the problems with Paypal are a sufficient condition to refrain from using it. I actually see this discussion as similar to the one about the use of CDNs: CDNs are more an infrastructure issue than a free software issue; payment processors are a financial issue, not a free software issue. Lucas signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: donations and paypal
(Re-adding -project@ to Cc. I'm assuming that your reply to -www@ missed
the fact that the mail was bounced to -project@.)
On 17/11/14 at 11:23 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum writes ("donations and paypal"):
> > (resending to -www@, #681501 is now archived)
> ...
> > I was asked to look into the question of whether (and how) we should
> > list Paypal on https://www.debian.org/donations.
> ...
> > So I think that Paypal should be listed similarly to other donations:
>
> Um, I don't understand.
>
> Debian itself is not able to own assets. Are you appointing Paypal as
> a TO ?
Some TOs are able to accept donations via Paypal (in addition to
bank transfers, checks, USA ePay, Click & Pledge, and other services).
The question I answered is whether we can list Paypal as an alternative
to other mechanisms for donations: it would be listed at the same level
as Click & Pledge, for example. (and not at the same level of TOs, as
you seem to have understood)
Paypal is currently listed as an option for Debian France, but some
people disagreed that we should mention it.
> In fact that web page already says that
>
> | Debian is able to accept direct equipment donations
>
> Does that mean that you as DPL are decreeing that Debian is accepting
> ownership of hardware ? That is contrary to the Debian constitution
> and probably unlawful (depending on the jurisdiction).
I'll let hardware-donations@d.o clarify, but AFAIK, we have had two
kinds of hardware donations so far:
- the ones where the donor did not ask for a legal document specifying
who is the recipient of the hardware; we did not bother to write one.
- the ones where a legal document was required. A TO was involved in
those cases.
Lucas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#778611: donations: fix listing of paypal for Debian France
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, The patch below fixes the listing of paypal for Debian France (so that it's mentioned in the top table, rather than 'other'). See also https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2014/11/msg00067.html for the context of this change. Lucas Index: donations.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/donations.wml,v retrieving revision 1.82 diff -u -r1.82 donations.wml --- donations.wml 18 Jan 2015 14:25:13 - 1.82 +++ donations.wml 17 Feb 2015 13:34:35 - @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Debian France wire transfer, - other + PayPal France, tax-exempt non-profit @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ mailto:c...@france.debian.net";>c...@france.debian.net. -PayPal +PayPal Donations can be sent via the https://france.debian.net/galette/plugins/galette-plugin-paypal/paypal_form.php?pref_lang=en_US";>Debian France PayPal page. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150217133623.15388.83833.report...@grr.loria.fr
installation guide for jessie is the one for stretch
(Not subscribed, please Cc) Hi, On https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/installmanual If I select the HTML manual in english for AMD64, I get to: https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/amd64/index.html.en Which says: "This document contains installation instructions for the Debian GNU/Linux 9 system (codename “stretch”), for the 64-bit PC (“amd64”) architecture." And talks about "Installing Debian GNU/Linux 9 For amd64". Is that expected, or is that a bug? What is the logic behind that? Thanks, Lucas
Re: installation guide for jessie is the one for stretch
On 04/02/16 at 09:46 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > (Not subscribed, please Cc) > > Hi, > > On https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/installmanual > If I select the HTML manual in english for AMD64, I get to: > https://www.debian.org/releases/jessie/amd64/index.html.en > Which says: > "This document contains installation instructions for the Debian > GNU/Linux 9 system (codename “stretch”), for the 64-bit PC (“amd64”) > architecture." > And talks about "Installing Debian GNU/Linux 9 For amd64". > > Is that expected, or is that a bug? What is the logic behind that? I just saw that it was already asked yesterday, sorry about the noise. For reference: https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2016/02/msg7.html Lucas
Re: Bug#640737: [copyright-format] misc. changes from driver.
On 26/09/11 at 16:59 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > Le 26/09/2011 12:05, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > Bill Allombert writes: > >> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 09:31:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > >>> I think that we need to resolve #640737 first. The most frequently > >>> proposed URL, > >>> ‘http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/’ > >>> (with the slash at the end) looks safe, but I would feel more > >>> comfortable if we had more feedback on both the debian-policy and > >>> debian-www lists. > > >> I do not see any policy-related objection. I hope the debian-www team > >> can confirm that this URL is available. > > > > Yup, this looks good to me as well (with or without the packaging-manuals > > component as debian-www would prefer). > > On the debian-www side, keeping the packaging-manuals component seems > right: it's the canonical path [1] for the policy related documents (by > the way, the packaging tutorial should probably better suited within the > manuals path [2]: Lucas, is it OK for you? If so, I'll prepare the move > and a redirection from the current URL, please reply only to debian-www > for this side issue in order not to spam this bug log). > > 1: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/ > 2: http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/ Sure Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110927044605.ga17...@xanadu.blop.info
visual look of ffis and SPI websites
Hi, I got a mail (to leader@) from someone who said that he wanted to donate money to Debian, but was a bit turned down by the look of the ffis website. I must admit that I quite agree that it looks a bit 2000-ish. The SPI website is not much better. Shouldn't we include more information on how to donate on http://www.debian.org/donations, so that it's not required for donors to go to the ffis and SPI websites? Or help with ffis and SPI so that their website look a bit more modern? Comments/ideas? Was there a strong reason not to include more info directly on the donations page? Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130507074027.ga11...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#709617: www.debian.org: update list of delegates in organization.html
Package: www.debian.org Hi, Please find attached a patch that: - replace "delegation mail" with "appointment mail" for the secretary - adds a few missing delegations: + DM keyring team + GSOC 2013 - add a pointer to the delegation mail for the Keyring team. - add (delegate) next to names of delegates. Thanks, Lucas ? about.en.html ? cn.en.html ? cooperation.en.html ? diversity.en.html ? free.en.html ? help.en.html ? index.en.html ? license_disc.en.html ? organization.data.diff ? organization.en.html ? search.en.html ? why_debian.en.html Index: organization.data === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/intro/organization.data,v retrieving revision 1.461 diff -u -r1.461 organization.data --- organization.data 23 May 2013 19:44:06 - 1.461 +++ organization.data 24 May 2013 12:48:51 - @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@ %attributes — <%0> — http://lists.debian.org/%0";>delegation mail +— http://lists.debian.org/%0";>appointment mail + (delegate) # current* is only for positions necessarily transitional, such as the leader current @@ -65,7 +67,7 @@ Ian Jackson Steve Langasek Colin Watson - Secretary> + Secretary> Kurt Roeckx Neil McGovern @@ -78,9 +80,9 @@ http://ftp-master.debian.org/";>FTP Archives> FTP Masters> - Ansgar Burchardt - Joerg Jaspert - Mark Hymers + Ansgar Burchardt + Joerg Jaspert + Mark Hymers FTP Assistants> Mike O'Connor Alexander Reichle-Schmehl @@ -91,8 +93,8 @@ http://backports-master.debian.org/";>Backports> Backports Team> -Alexander Wirt -Gerfried Fuchs +Alexander Wirt +Gerfried Fuchs Individual Packages>@packages.debian.org http://release.debian.org/";>Release Management> @@ -215,9 +217,9 @@ Press Contact> -Francesca Ciceri -Martin Schulze -Neil McGovern +Francesca Ciceri +Martin Schulze +Neil McGovern Paul Wise Moray Allan Kai Wasserbäch @@ -238,8 +240,8 @@ Marcelo Santana Martin Schulze http://bits.debian.org/";>Bits from Debian> -Francesca Ciceri -Ana Beatriz Guerrero López +Francesca Ciceri +Ana Beatriz Guerrero López @@ -327,17 +329,21 @@ Martin Zobel-Helas Pascal Hakim New Members Front Desk> -Bernd Zeimetz -Enrico Zini -Jan Hauke Rahm -Jonathan Wiltshire +Bernd Zeimetz +Enrico Zini +Jan Hauke Rahm +Jonathan Wiltshire Debian Account Managers> -Joerg Jaspert -Christoph Berg -Enrico Zini - http://keyring.debian.org/";>Keyring Maintainers (PGP and GPG)> -Jonathan McDowell +Joerg Jaspert +Christoph Berg +Enrico Zini + http://keyring.debian.org/";>Keyring Maintainers (PGP and GPG)> +Jonathan McDowell Gunnar Wolf + http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer";>Debian Maintainer (DM) Keyring Maintainers> +Anibal Monsalve Salazar +Anthony Towns +Joey Hess Security Team> Aurelien Jarno Dann Frazier @@ -390,18 +396,18 @@ Joerg Jaspert Jordi Mallach Policy> -Andreas Barth -Bill Allombert -Charles Plessy -Russ Allbery +Andreas Barth +Bill Allombert +Charles Plessy +Russ Allbery http://dsa.debian.org/";>System Administration> This is the address to use when encountering problems on one of Debian's machines, including password problems or you need a package installed.> -Luca Filipozzi -Tollef Fog Heen -Stephen Gran -Faidon Liambotis -Peter Palfrader -Martin Zobel-Helas +Luca Filipozzi +Tollef Fog Heen +Stephen Gran +Faidon Liambotis +Peter Palfrader +Martin Zobel-Helas If you have hardware problems with Debian machines, please see http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi";>Debian Machines page, it should contain per-machine administrator information.> http://db.debian.org/";>LDAP Developer Directory Administrator> Mirrors> @@ -418,7 +424,7 @@ Benjamin Mako Hill Rob Bradford http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Auditor";>Auditor> -Martin Michlmayr +Martin Michlmayr Martin Wuertele Trademark use requests> current Debian Project Leader @@ -437,9 +443,12 @@ Margarita Manterola Meike Reichle http://www.debconf.org/";>DebConf chairs> -Holger Levsen -Moray Allan -Gunnar Wolf +Holger Levsen +Moray Allan +Gunnar Wolf + http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013";>Summer of Code 2013 Administrators> +David Bremner +Paul Tagliamonte
Bug#709617: www.debian.org: update list of delegates in organization.html
On 24/05/13 at 11:44 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > Le 24/05/2013 08:57, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > Please find attached a patch that: > > Thanks! > > > - adds a few missing delegations: > […] > > + GSOC 2013 > > This kind of restricted in time role has never been part of this page, > is there any rationale to change the status quo? I'd like to have an authoritative list of delegations. I think that it makes sense that organizations.html is that list to avoid a duplication of efforts. The problem is that we need to include the time-limited delegations, then. > > - add (delegate) next to names of delegates. > > This must allow a feminine form, for some translations. Such a trick > already exists, probably in the DPN handling. Do you have a more precise pointer? I tried to find something, but failed. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130524155046.ga29...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#709617: www.debian.org: update list of delegates in organization.html
On 24/05/13 at 13:53 -0400, "David Prévot" wrote: > Hi, > > > On 24/05/13 at 11:44 -0400, David Prévot wrote: > >> Le 24/05/2013 08:57, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > >>> - add (delegate) next to names of delegates. > >> > >> This must allow a feminine form, for some translations. Such a trick > >> already exists, probably in the DPN handling. > > > > Do you have a more precise pointer? > > Sure: english/template/debian/weeklynews/footer.wml Thanks. New version of the patch attached. I went for something simpler than in the weeklynews template, but that should work. Lucas Index: organization.data === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/intro/organization.data,v retrieving revision 1.461 diff -u -r1.461 organization.data --- organization.data 23 May 2013 19:44:06 - 1.461 +++ organization.data 24 May 2013 18:40:01 - @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ %attributes — <%0> — http://lists.debian.org/%0";>delegation mail +— http://lists.debian.org/%0";>appointment mail + (delegate) + (delegate) # current* is only for positions necessarily transitional, such as the leader current @@ -65,7 +68,7 @@ Ian Jackson Steve Langasek Colin Watson - Secretary> + Secretary> Kurt Roeckx Neil McGovern @@ -78,9 +81,9 @@ http://ftp-master.debian.org/";>FTP Archives> FTP Masters> - Ansgar Burchardt - Joerg Jaspert - Mark Hymers + Ansgar Burchardt + Joerg Jaspert + Mark Hymers FTP Assistants> Mike O'Connor Alexander Reichle-Schmehl @@ -91,8 +94,8 @@ http://backports-master.debian.org/";>Backports> Backports Team> -Alexander Wirt -Gerfried Fuchs +Alexander Wirt +Gerfried Fuchs Individual Packages> <packagename>@packages.debian.org http://release.debian.org/";>Release Management> @@ -215,9 +218,9 @@ Press Contact> -Francesca Ciceri -Martin Schulze -Neil McGovern +Francesca Ciceri +Martin Schulze +Neil McGovern Paul Wise Moray Allan Kai Wasserbäch @@ -238,8 +241,8 @@ Marcelo Santana Martin Schulze http://bits.debian.org/";>Bits from Debian> -Francesca Ciceri -Ana Beatriz Guerrero López +Francesca Ciceri +Ana Beatriz Guerrero López @@ -327,17 +330,21 @@ Martin Zobel-Helas Pascal Hakim New Members Front Desk> -Bernd Zeimetz -Enrico Zini -Jan Hauke Rahm -Jonathan Wiltshire +Bernd Zeimetz +Enrico Zini +Jan Hauke Rahm +Jonathan Wiltshire Debian Account Managers> -Joerg Jaspert -Christoph Berg -Enrico Zini - http://keyring.debian.org/";>Keyring Maintainers (PGP and GPG)> -Jonathan McDowell +Joerg Jaspert +Christoph Berg +Enrico Zini + http://keyring.debian.org/";>Keyring Maintainers (PGP and GPG)> +Jonathan McDowell Gunnar Wolf + http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer";>Debian Maintainer (DM) Keyring Maintainers> +Anibal Monsalve Salazar +Anthony Towns +Joey Hess Security Team> Aurelien Jarno Dann Frazier @@ -390,18 +397,18 @@ Joerg Jaspert Jordi Mallach Policy> -Andreas Barth -Bill Allombert -Charles Plessy -Russ Allbery +Andreas Barth +Bill Allombert +Charles Plessy +Russ Allbery http://dsa.debian.org/";>System Administration> This is the address to use when encountering problems on one of Debian's machines, including password problems or you need a package installed.> -Luca Filipozzi -Tollef Fog Heen -Stephen Gran -Faidon Liambotis -Peter Palfrader -Martin Zobel-Helas +Luca Filipozzi +Tollef Fog Heen +Stephen Gran +Faidon Liambotis +Peter Palfrader +Martin Zobel-Helas If you have hardware problems with Debian machines, please see http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi";>Debian Machines page, it should contain per-machine administrator information.> http://db.debian.org/";>LDAP Developer Directory Administrator> Mirrors> @@ -418,7 +425,7 @@ Benjamin Mako Hill Rob Bradford http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Auditor";>Auditor> -Martin Michlmayr +Martin Michlmayr Martin Wuertele Trademark use requests> current Debian Project Leader @@ -437,9 +444,12 @@ Margarita Manterola Meike Reichle http://www.debconf.org/";>DebConf chairs> -Holger Levsen -Moray Allan -Gunnar Wolf +Holger Levsen +Moray Allan +Gunnar Wolf + http://wiki.debian.org/SummerOfCode2013";>Summer of Code 2013 Administrators> +David Bremner +Paul Tagliamonte
Bug#719467: www.debian.org: add link to packaging tutorial on http://www.debian.org/doc/index
Package: www.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, I received quite positive feedback about the Debian Packaging Tutorial, and it is already listed on http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals#packaging-tutorial, so I think that it would make sense to list it together with the new maintainer's guide on http://www.debian.org/doc/index . The patch below does just that. Thanks, Lucas Index: index.wml === RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/doc/index.wml,v retrieving revision 1.100 diff -u -r1.100 index.wml --- index.wml 27 Mar 2013 03:26:05 - 1.100 +++ index.wml 12 Aug 2013 07:17:50 - @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ Debian New Maintainers' Guide + Debian Packaging Tutorial Debian Developer's Reference -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130812072101.8419.66024.reportbug@grep
Bug#719467: www.debian.org: add link to packaging tutorial on http://www.debian.org/doc/index
On 12/08/13 at 09:38 +0200, David Prévot wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > Le 12/08/2013 09:21, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit : > > > […] it would make sense to list it together with the new maintainer's > > guide on http://www.debian.org/doc/ > > Please note it’s already linked from this page: > > > Developers' manuals > > > > Debian Policy Manual > > Debian Developer's > > Reference > > Debian New Maintainers' > > Guide > > Introduction to Debian > > packaging > > I’m not sure duplicating informations on the same page would be worth it > (an improvement could be to shorten this page IMHO), should we close > this bug? Well maint-guide is also listed twice :) My strategy was just to get it listed where maint-guide is listed. Otherwise, it might make sense to drop the whole 'If you want to start developing packages for Debian we recommend you go through:' paragraph. Recommending to read dev-ref is kinda useless for new contributors anyway, since it's mostly about procedures relevant to DDs. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130812083405.ga12...@xanadu.blop.info
Re: SSL for screenshots.debian.net?
On 11/02/14 at 11:51 +0100, Christoph Haas wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Am 11.02.2014 11:37, schrieb Julien Cristau: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:38:39 +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 11 Feb 2014, Christoph Haas wrote: > >> > >>> Regarding the certificate: does Debian have resources to buy an > >>> SSL certificate? I usually use a free StartCom certificate for > >>> my own purposes but I am not sure whether it is suitable for > >>> such use. I don't think that the sponsor will donate an SSL > >>> certificate either but I'm willing to ask. > >> > >> jcristau recently got a cert for france.debian.net from gandi, > >> using the "put a file on the webserver" method of authentication. > >> Gandi certs are around 12 Euros a year. > >> > > startcom requires control of the top level (debian.net) so that > > didn't work. So I went with gandi, and got a 1-year certificate > > for 14.40€. > > Thanks for the hint. I will get a Gandi certificate then and make > screenshots.debian.net HTTPS-enabled. As soon as I'm done I'll get > back to you so you can change the links. Hi Christoph, Debian could pay for the certificate, if needed. Especially if the medium-term plan is to move the service to Debian infrastructure. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140211211532.ga25...@xanadu.blop.info
Re: bitcoin
On 16/02/14 at 16:07 +0600, Kanat Amrenov wrote: > Hi. > > Why do not you accept Bitcoin as a donation? Hi Kanat, All I can say for now is that we are looking into it, but haven't reached a conclusion on this yet. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140218072728.ga1...@xanadu.blop.info
Re: Bug#738713: Implement whatcanidofordebian.org?
On 04/03/14 at 02:13 +0100, Tomasz Nitecki wrote: > You can get the whole list of > 'opportunities' in gzipped JSON format from UDD [2] and then parse and > filter it according to your needs (you should ask Lucas Nussbaum if it's > fine to use UDD to feed production version of whatcanidofordebian.org). It's totally fine, sure. Lucas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140312133525.ga12...@xanadu.blop.info
update of developers-reference
[ please CC me, I'm not subscribed ] Hi, We uploaded a new version of developers-reference (v. 3.4.0). What's the process to get the public version at http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/index.en.html to be updated ? developers-reference now lives in SVN, at svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddp/manuals/trunk/developers-reference -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: developers-reference: SVN vs released version on www.debian.org ?
On 15/09/09 at 22:29 +0200, Simon Paillard wrote: > Dear devref editors, > > I noticed that the current website build perform both installation of > developers-reference from the unstable package, then from the SVN. > > So currently the SVN version is the one published at > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ > > You can notice there is 'ver. unknown'. > > Before disabling installation from package, can you confirm > publishing the SVN trunk is ok for you ? It is, from my POV at least. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
