Bug#639337: marked as done (www.debain.org: please update information on sparc port (was: Re: information given on http://www.debian.org/ports/))

2011-08-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:56:20 +0200
with message-id <20110827105620.8c772aa9.li...@wansing-online.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#639337: www.debain.org: please update information on 
sparc port
has caused the Debian Bug report #639337,
regarding www.debain.org: please update information on sparc port (was: Re: 
information given on http://www.debian.org/ports/)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
639337: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639337
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

Hi Holger,

Op Thu 25 Aug 2011 om 09:52:23 +0200 schreef Holger Wansing:
> [debian-sparc in CC; fullquote due to this - Sorry]

Well, thanks for raising this issue!

> "stephan.g...@t-online.de"  wrote:
> > Hello together,
> > on this URL is something written about the Sparc port.
> > 
> > > sparc -Sun SPARC -First officially released with Debian 2.1. This
> > port runs on the Sun SPARCstation series of workstations, as well as
> > some of their successors in the sun4 architectures. -   released

> > Well ... the SPARCstations are only the systems before sun4u ... such as
> > sun4c, sun4d and sun4m (and possibly sun4). This is documented on
> > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/SPARCstation.

http://www.debian.org/ports/index should be changed, here's a pseudo-patch:

s/
This port runs on the Sun SPARC station series of workstations, as well as some
of their successors in the sun4 architectures.
/
This port runs on the Sun SPARC Ultra series of workstations, as well as some
of their successors in the sun4 architectures.
/

> > But the Debian Sparc port only supports sun4u and sun4v (please see
> > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/sparc/ch02s01.html.en, chapter
> > 2.1.2).
> > 
> > 
> > 2.1.2. CPU and Main Boards Support
> > 
> > Sparc-based hardware is divided into a number of different
> > subarchitectures, identified by one of the following names: sun4, sun4c,
> > sun4d, sun4m, sun4u or sun4v. The following list describes what machines
> > they include and what level of support may be expected for each of them.
> > 
> > sun4, sun4c, sun4d, sun4m
> > 
> > None of these 32-bit sparc subarchitectures (sparc32) is supported.
> > For a complete list of machines belonging to these subarchitectures,
> > please consult the Wikipedia SPARCstation page. 
> > 
> > 
> > I think it would be a good idea to correct the statement about sparc
> > support in the actual Debian release. The SPARCstation class is
> > absolutely not supported anymore.
> > Thanks.
> > Best regards,
> > Stephan
> 
> Additionally to that, the sparc ports page under
> http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/
> says, that only sun4u is supported, sun4v is not mentioned there.
> 
> CC'ing debian-sparc list for clarification:
> 
> debian-sparc guys: could you provide patches for relevant sites
> of the website?

http://www.debian.org/ports/sparc/ should be changed:

s/
Supported is Sun4u machines
/
Supported are sun4u and sun4v machines
/

and

s/
does support the sun4u (“Ultra”) architecture
/
does support the sun4u (“Ultra”) and sun4v (Niagara CPU) architecture
/

> Is the installation manual correct or are there
> also changes necessary?

I believe the current stable installation manual is correct.

Issues with www.debian.org reported as bug.

Thanks, Bye,

Joost

-- 
irc:joostvb@{OFTC,freenode} ∙ http://mdcc.cx/ ∙ http://ad1810.com/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,

"stephan.g...@t-online.de"  wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea to correct the statement about sparc
> support in the actual Debian release. The SPARCstation class is
> absolutely not supported anymore.

Fixed.
Thanks!

Holger


[ports_index.diff  text/x-diff (559B)]
--- ports_index_orig.wml2011-08-26 09:36:49.493696753 +0200
+++ ports_index_workingcopy.wml 2011-08-26 09:53:06.053698588 +0200
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
 sparc
 Sun SPARC
 First officially released with Debian 2.1. This port runs on the Sun
-SPARCstation series of workstations, as well as some of their successors
+UltraSPARC series of workstations, as well as some of their successors
 in the sun4 architectures.
 released
 

[ports_sparc_index.diff  text/x-diff (975B)]
--- ports_sparc_index_orig.wml  2011-08-26 09:39:20.649697301 +0200
+++ ports_sparc_index_workingcopy.wml   2011-08-26 09:44:49.165697308 +0200
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
 Current Status
   
 Debian SPARC is officially released and known to be stable.  Supported
-is Sun4u machines (with

Re: Get Organic SEO and Link Building Service

2011-08-27 Thread Mark Charles 

On 27/08/11 20:57, Tapash Dutta wrote:

Hello Sir/Madam,

I am contacting you



spamming - you. are. spamming. us. Not fun when you're the recipient is 
it? You probably should have installed better filters.


How is the fax paper holding out?

You appear to be running a number of brothels and free give-aways from 
the same phone number - does that make answering the phone a challenge.


Whoops - your domain has been added to the blacklists.





So, you can find us at 1st page for the keyword "Internet marketing
service", "internet marketing promotion" , "Internet marketing
Company" and "Internet marketing services" at Google.com.


No I can't - because, like all link farmers and their gullible clients,
you only get first page for a day or two - then you get "adjusted" to
the butt end of the rank for ever - where you belong.





I look forward to hearing from you soon.


I'll take that as explicit consent on your part.




Thanks and regards Tapash Dutta SEO Consultant


Kismet for Thieves and Liars Pty. Ltd.


(p) Ltd. Disclaimer: The CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 (Controlling the
Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act) establishes
requirements for those who send commercial email, spells out
penalties for spammers and companies whose products are advertised in
spam if they violate the law, and gives consumers the right to ask e
mailers to stop spamming them.The above mail is in accordance to the
Can Spam act of 2003: There are no deceptive subject lines and is a
manual process through our efforts on World wide web. You can opt out
by sending mail and we ensure you will not receive any such mails.


Quote all the irrelevant legislation you like - you are still bottom
feeding scum breaching the laws that forbid sending unsolicited
commercial advertising. You have been reported.

P.S. - you must be very brave informing on the most dangerous drug 
smugglers in Bengal, especially as they now know your name, workplace, 
and home address - if I was you I'd have moved a long, long, way away.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e58fe34.6080...@yahoo.com.au

Fwd: Congratulations on creating your new LinkedIn Group!

2011-08-27 Thread mike stefko 
-- Forwarded message --
From: LinkedIn 
Date: Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 11:12 AM
Subject: Congratulations on creating your new LinkedIn Group!
To: mike stefko 


   LinkedIn

Hi mike,

Congratulations on creating your new LinkedIn group!

*Saving peoples homes*
http://www.linkedin.com/e/-26v3a8-gruqbm3s-3b/vgh/4062486/

To get started, click the "Manage" link on the My
Groupspage
to invite users, approve or decline requests to join, and edit
information about your group.

Need help with your group? We invite you to browse the
FAQ.

Send me an email for each new discussion
»

Sincerely,
LinkedIn
http://www.linkedin.com/

Processed: summary 567781 162

2011-08-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> summary 567781 162
Bug #567781 [www.debian.org] www.debian.org: converting the website to UTF-8
Summary recorded from message bug 567781 message 162
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
567781: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=567781
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131446424715041.transcr...@bugs.debian.org

Re: set to pre in CSS ?!

2011-08-27 Thread Simon Paillard 
Hi,

On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 12:44:48AM +0200, Simon Paillard wrote:
> 23:51 < scottmir> I've noticed two errors in french/News/2011/20110623.wml 
> and two in the original english version, too
> 23:53 < scottmir> fr: translation missing (line 33-34) and line feed missing 
> (line 34)
> 23:55 < scottmir> en: line feed inside  tag (line 30) and libeoffice-gtk 
> instead of libreoffice-gtk (line 33)
> http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110623.en.html
> 
> It's because  induces pre in CSS:
> 
> tt, code {
>   color:black;
>   font-family:monospace;
>   white-space:pre;
> }
> 
> http://people.debian.org/~spaillard/website/debian-www-css-tt-and-pre.png
> 
> What is the rationale behind changing this default ? Not use pre ?

Unless someone objects with a good reason, I will remove 'white-space: pre'
from tt and code, instead of finding and fixing all the affected pages.

-- 
Simon Paillard


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110827193652.gj27...@glenfiddich.mraw.org

Bug#638626: marked as done (http://www.debian.org/devel/misc/card.ps.gz contains conflict markers)

2011-08-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System 
Your message dated Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:52:24 +0200
with message-id <20110827195224.gk27...@glenfiddich.mraw.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#638626: http://www.debian.org/devel/misc/card.ps.gz 
contains conflict markers
has caused the Debian Bug report #638626,
regarding http://www.debian.org/devel/misc/card.ps.gz contains conflict markers
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
638626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: normal

The file in the wml tree is fine (i.e. english/devel/misc/card.ps),
however, the version on the website starts like the following:
%!PS-Adobe-2.0
%%Creator: dvips(k) 5.96.1 Copyright 2007 Radical Eye Software
%%Title: card.dvi
<<< card.ps
%%CreationDate: Sun Jul 19 18:33:32 2009
===
%%CreationDate: Mon Aug 31 15:20:50 2009
>>> 1.2
%%Pages: 1
%%PageOrder: Ascend
%%BoundingBox: 0 0 596 842
...

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32.44-grsec
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to de_DE.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
-- 
  Dr. Helge Kreutzmann deb...@helgefjell.de
   Dipl.-Phys.   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
64bit GNU powered gpg signed mail preferred
   Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 12:39:10PM +0200, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> The file in the wml tree is fine (i.e. english/devel/misc/card.ps),
> however, the version on the website starts like the following:
>
> %!PS-Adobe-2.0
> %%Creator: dvips(k) 5.96.1 Copyright 2007 Radical Eye Software
> %%Title: card.dvi
> <<< card.ps
> %%CreationDate: Sun Jul 19 18:33:32 2009
> ===
> %%CreationDate: Mon Aug 31 15:20:50 2009
> >>> 1.2
> %%Pages: 1

Thanks for the notice, file has been re-checkout from CVS and is ok now, and
soon on mirrors. 

-- 
Simon Paillard

--- End Message ---

Re: set to pre in CSS ?!

2011-08-27 Thread victory 
On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:36:52 +0200
Simon Paillard wrote:

> > tt, code {
> > color:black;
> > font-family:monospace;
> > white-space:pre;
> > }

similar to this (munging some of the contents), I have a question.
is this really needed? (this makes FAQ -> faq):
#breadcrumbs {
(snip)
text-transform: lowercase;
(snip)
}


-- 
victory
no need to CC me :-)
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/102724


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110828075717.78a105a7.victory@gmail.com

bugs.debian.org: [once more] Please add support for tag "wheezy"

2011-08-27 Thread Holger Wansing 
[Bugreport text sent again, because it didn't make it to the
list, most likely due to attachments.
Please find the patches under 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639532]


Package: bugs.debian.org
Tags: patch


Some of you may remember this issue, see #623524.
There is some work left on this:

On
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/index.en.html
under "Select bugs" there is a list of tags which is lacking
'wheezy' and 'wheezy-ignore'.

On 
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-refcard.en.html
under "Tags currently include ..." is a list of tags which is 
also lacking 'wheezy' and 'wheezy-ignore'.


To make all this easier (and to not forget some occurences), 
we should change all occurences to use an entity like the 
already existing 'bts_tags' entity, which is generated in 
../english/Bugs/pkgreport-opts.inc and which is already used
in ../Bugs/index.wml:
Valid tags are 
The existing bts_tags entity has the disadvantage, that there
is no possibility to use a different formatting, what would be
good here.
Don't know why bts_tags is generated as it is:
---snip--
# this is pasted from debbugs/etc/config

@gTags = ( "patch", "wontfix", "moreinfo", "unreproducible", "fixed",
   "potato", "woody", "sid", "help", "security", "upstream",
   "pending", "sarge", "sarge-ignore", "experimental", "d-i",
   "confirmed", "ipv6", "lfs", "fixed-in-experimental",
   "fixed-upstream", "l10n", "etch", "etch-ignore",
   "lenny", "lenny-ignore",
 );



  <: print join(", ", @gTags); :>

-snap
Are there special circumstances for this?
I have prepared a patch, that changes this to a more generic way
(without perl).

And:
On http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html#tags
I would also add a list of tags via that entity as a headline 
in top of all that long descriptions, because this list is getting
longer and longer. For a quick overview such a listing would be
good on the top.


That all would lead to changings in:../Bugs/Developer.wml
../Bugs/server-control.wml
../Bugs/server-refcard.wml
../Bugs/index.wml
../Bugs/pkgreport-opts.inc


Patches attached.

Holger


-- 
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Created with Sylpheed 3.0.2
under DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 6.0 - S q u e e z e 
Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://counter.li.org/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110828082241.e8cb0aa9.li...@wansing-online.de