THE-HANOREABLE---UNICEF----2000+1000+...

[victoria laademan]

TO-THE-HANOREABLEUNICEF+INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org
 
 
NO.1.WEB.www.sun.comNO.2.WEB.www.unicefusa.orgNO.3.WEB.www.mirror.ac.uk/NO.4.WEB.www.un.org/aroundworld/unics/icpages.htmNO.5.WEB.www.unsystem.orgNO.6.WEB.www.nato.intNO.7.WEB.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.htmlNO.8.WEB.www.inqueweb.com.auNO.9.WEB.www.ctbto.orgNO.10.WEB.www.bbc.co.uk/NO.11.WEB.www.usp.br.NO.12.WEB.www.w3.org/PICS/PICS-FAQ-980126.html
THE-HANOREABLE-UNICEF-KEAP/THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK---CYACLEUNICEF---USA...
DATE.99/99+11.01.2000+...TIME.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org
YOUR`S-THE-HANOREABLE-MR.SUDHIRNAYAK/SERAGADABLOCKCOLONI/GANJAM/ORISSA/INDIA1.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.ctbto.orgOR2.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.orgOR3.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/OR4.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.nato.intOR5.PH.NO.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.unicefusa.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.ctbto.org[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.mirror.ac.uk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]passwod.INTERNET.www.nato.int[EMAIL PROTECTED]password.INTERNET.www.cytimes.com/pages/worldspecial.index.html
 
Yahoo! India Mobile: Ringtones, Wallpapers, Picture Messages and more.
Download now.

Suggestion for To-Do List Page

[Alexander Winston]

Currently, on , we have a list of
things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are
fairly limited to developers. I propose adding
 and especially
 as
things that can be assisted with by ordinary users or folks that do not
have official Debian developer status yet.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#83701: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms has a package been compiled)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2001 01:34:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 26 19:34:59 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from snoopy.apana.org.au [:::202.12.87.129] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14MKGV-0001l7-00; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 19:34:58 -0600
Received: by snoopy.apana.org.au (Postfix, from userid 1003)
id 66631345DB; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:34:44 +1100 (EST)
From: Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: should be possible to tell what platforms have been compiled
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 12:34:44 +1100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-01-27
Severity: wishlist

Hello,

(this is similar but different to bug #21620 in that I don't
require download support).

I think that now package pools are available, it is going to be more and
more important to be able to find out answers to questions like:

Has the latest version of libssl096 been compiled for sparc?

or even better:

What is the latest version of libssl096 available for sparc?

This is important to know as package X, which build-depends on
libssl096-dev, can't get installed in testing until it has been
compiled on all platforms. This means libssl096 has been
compiled for all platforms.

update_excuses does not help, it was designed to answer the
question "can libssl096 be installed in testing?", not "can
package X use libssl096-dev from unstable for its build-depends
on all platforms?".

yes, I could download the entire Packages file for sparc to find out,
but this file is huge, and my bandwidth is limited.

(of course this means stable, as testing is guaranteed to
have the same version available for all platforms)

-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux snoopy 2.4.0 #1 Sun Jan 14 15:45:35 EST 2001 i686


---
Received: (at 83701-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes

Bug#215999: marked as done (packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is outdated)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Oct 2003 20:50:23 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 15 15:49:58 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net [212.135.6.12] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A9sak-0001zf-00; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 15:49:58 -0500
Received: from tnt-25-200.easynet.co.uk ([212.134.234.200] 
helo=nestie.pigeonloft)
by smarthost2.mail.uk.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
id 1A9saj-000JVK-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:49:57 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.1] (helo=pigeon.pigeonloft ident=mail)
by nestie.pigeonloft with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1A9sDC-00051k-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:25:38 +0100
Received: from pigeon by pigeon.pigeonloft with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1A9sDC-0002gD-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:25:38 +0100
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 21:25:38 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mldonkey source code "not found" on website
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RpDyejMaDGJhP2PU"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--RpDyejMaDGJhP2PU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: mldonkey
Version: 2.5.3-1

  The Debian website package pages for mldonkey
 =20
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/mldonkey-gui.html
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/mldonkey-server.html

  show "Source code: not found".

--=20
Pigeon

Be kind to pigeons
Get my GPG key here: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D=
0x21C61F7F

--RpDyejMaDGJhP2PU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE/ja1CUxADjyHGH38RAiW0AKC4MskauYA2w+b2U5YwfMc3G3KcSgCgvE+R
8oJgSRTT7YgHUg+lWVjoOgE=
=q2Yu
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--RpDyejMaDGJhP2PU--

---
Received: (at 215999-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:04 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merge

Bug#177669: marked as done (packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Jan 2003 05:40:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 20 23:40:50 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ar9W-00071m-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:40:50 -0600
Received: from tc210-203-44-151.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.44.151] 
helo=jidanni.org)
by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
id 18ar9S-0008V0-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 00:40:49 -0500
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18anKk-00025s-00; Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:36:10 +0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="BIG5"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html
too big
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.2
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:36:10 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.1 required=5.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: **

Package: www.debian.org
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-01-21
Severity: wishlist

http://packages.debian.org/*/allpackages.html is over 1 meg.
please put warnings on their parent pages.

BTW, tidy(1) shows tons of: Warning:  attribute "color" has invalid value 
"FF"


also there, please make a link:
list of packages added, updated within the last week, month.


BTW, what is  doing deep in 
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html
libroxen-sexybody 0.2-7
 tag replacement module for the Roxen Challenger web server
libroxen-simplenews 2.7-7



some mostly offline folks might just want a quick diet checklist of
current package numbers,

3dwm-clock 0.3.1-11
3dwm-csgclient 0.3.1-11
3dwm-geoclient 0.3.1-11
3dwm-pickclient 0.3.1-11
3dwm-server 0.3.1-11
3dwm-texclient 0.3.1-11

one could use this makefile
B=http://packages.debian.org/unstable/allpackages.html
t=/tmp/f
$t:
lynx -dump -nolist $B|sed -n '/^   [^ ]/s/...//p'|sed 
'1{/About/d;};/^$$/,$$d' > $@
asv: $t #see what is newer than last time I got Packages.gz
apt-show-versions -u |sed 's#/.* # #'|sort|join - $t|awk '$$2!=$$3'

or better yet, you could put a $t.gz on the site... less than 100K
instead of the 1000 K download... may be better ways.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5


---
Received: (at 177669-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:04:53 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XX

Bug#221114: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2003 16:01:15 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 16 10:01:14 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from imap.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net) [213.165.64.20] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ALPKs-00012b-00; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 10:01:14 -0600
Received: (qmail 17056 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Nov 2003 16:01:13 -
Received: from b119096.adsl.hansenet.de (EHLO homer.simpson.test) 
(62.109.119.96)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 16 Nov 2003 17:01:13 +0100
X-Authenticated: #7842102
From: Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 17:01:17 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_99,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: Minor

Hi,

on http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ is a spelling error in the description 
of the "Python" section:

Everything about Python, an interpretive, interactive object oriented 
language.

s/interpretive/interpreted/

Cheers,

-- 

Tobias

Don't you just hate it when there's not enough room to fin


---
Received: (at 221114-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:04:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:04:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alt

Bug#219653: marked as done (packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2003 21:21:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 07 15:21:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from starnet.skynet.com.pl (skynet.skynet.com.pl) [213.25.173.230] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AIE32-0004Jz-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 15:21:40 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=melina.ds14.agh.edu.pl)
by skynet.skynet.com.pl with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1AIE2r-HB-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 22:21:29 +0100
Received: from porridge by melina.ds14.agh.edu.pl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 
(Debian))
id 1AIE2m-00043W-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 22:21:24 +0100
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 22:21:24 +0100
From: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.36
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scanner: exiscan *1AIE2r-HB-00*r7wJ4gGuTI.*
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_10_20,HTML_MESSAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_7
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_7 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor

Compare http://packages.debian.org/unstable/ with
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/

You'll see an extra "" line, which
breaks formatting.

-- 
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://marcin.owsiany.pl/
GnuPG: 1024D/60F41216  FE67 DA2D 0ACA FC5E 3F75  D6F6 3A0D 8AA0 60F4 1216

---
Received: (at 219653-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:04:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:04:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle vir

Bug#162588: marked as done (packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2002 13:30:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 27 08:30:56 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rdial505.urz.tu-dresden.de (carlos.godisch.de) [141.30.48.5] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17uvCp-0001Xi-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 08:30:56 -0500
Received: from godisch by carlos.godisch.de with local (Exim/Debian)
id 17uvBk-000507-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:29:48 +0200
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:29:48 +0200
From: Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 2AB1 9CDD 4BA9 D7FB 6927  5A9E 9A91 821D 68DC D606
X-No-Archive: yes
Sender: Martin Godisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-09-27
Severity: minor

Please add timezone specifications to the last modified footer on
packages.debian.org.

Thank you! -- Martin

---
Received: (at 162588-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:04:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:04:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages

 Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big

* Minor fixes:

 Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
 Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified

Bug#202157: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2003 10:00:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 20 05:00:44 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19eAzj-0006Nl-00; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 05:00:43 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 22C4E26B2E; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:00:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1640022988; Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 12:00:38 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.d.o should list uploaders
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

The packages.d.o pages list the maintainer of the package.  However,
it would be nice to additionally show the uploaders.  Having uploaders
displays more prominently might encourage people to become
co-maintainers of packages.

As an example, alsa-base's source package alsa-driver has:

  Package: alsa-driver
  Binary: alsa-base, alsaconf, alsa-source, alsa-headers
  Maintainer: Debian-Alsa Psychos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  Uploaders: Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve Kowalik <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>, David B. Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

alsa-base's packages page says:
 | Debian-Alsa Psychos is responsible for this Debian package.

I would be nice if this page would say:

 | Debian-Alsa Psychos and Jordi Mallach, Steve Kowalik and David B.
 | Harris are esponsible for this Debian package.


-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Received: (at 202157-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:30 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:05:29 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: displa

Bug#130420: marked as done (packages.debian.org: should give link to copyright file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:32:54 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jan 2002 17:14:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 22 11:14:42 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadow.alternex.com.br [200.219.63.20] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16T4VM-0007PS-00; Tue, 22 Jan 2002 11:14:41 -0600
Received: from secure.alternex.com.br (secure.alternex.com.br [200.219.25.254])
by shadow.alternex.com.br (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0MHEWc25378;
Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:14:33 -0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Gustavo R. Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.d.o: should give link to copyright file
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 15:15:45 -0200
Reply-To: "Gustavo R. Franco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-22
Severity: wishlist

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Like #103889(packages.d.o: should give link to changelog), my
request is about add a link in the bottom of each package page.
Why? Because is important to users read informations about 
license of programs and where are your original tarballs before
download.


thanks,
  _   
 _ __|_ _.   _  _|_.__.._  _ _ 
(_||_|_> |_(_|\/(_)  | |(_|| |(_(_)[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _|nupg id: 0x37155778  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Rio de Janeiro/Brazil
Key fingerprint = 1908 52B9 4A16 6EC2 74D1  C03B EDFB 7005 3715 5778


- -- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux secure 2.4.17-gnrownz #1 Ter Jan 8 16:52:34 BRST 2002 i586
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8TZ5J7ftwBTcVV3gRAkp3AJ9x3609IcN1pQq3JW8CtLTJ5VYwnQCfRyKQ
oP80ThehEipErAtNBWpVGj8=
=srVV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


---
Received: (at 130420-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 22:03:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 16:03:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.11.35] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ag5xe-QR-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:34:46 -0600
Received: from unknown (HELO thanatos-wireless.hubertnet) ([EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with plain)
  by smtp004.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 17:34:45 -
Subject: Done
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:32:54 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

> give link to copyright file

This has been done.

Bug#227273: packages.debian.org: charset mismatch (always in UTF-8?)

[Hideki Yamane]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important

Dear webmasters,

 I'm pleased with packages.d.o is back online!

 But it causes mojibake by charset mismatch so we cannot read it without 
 changing to correct charset. 
 (mojibake: http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/mojibake/)

 For example, Japanese page must be in iso-2022-jp charset but it says that
 contents with "UTF-8". (and Its Japanease pages content in EUC-JP charset.
 for histrical reason, three major charset are used in Japan. Many UNIX
 releated things are in EUC-JP (Windows and Macintosh are Shift-JIS),
 but Debian's Japanease Lang web page is in iso-2022-jp charset. SO,
 EUC-JP contents must be changed to iso-2022-jp for web pages.)

 Could you check it, please?



-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane   mailto:henrich @ samba.gr.jp/iijmio-mail.jp

 

Bug#21620: marked as done (packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages should support multiple architectures)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 1998 17:25:30 +
Received: (qmail 11394 invoked from network); 24 Apr 1998 17:25:29 -
Received: from server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (192.129.16.1)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 24 Apr 1998 17:25:29 -
Received: from isis.pi.fho-emden.de (ppp015asc.fho-emden.de [193.174.117.15]) 
by server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA22540 for <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>; Fri, 24 Apr 1998 19:25:22 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by isis.pi.fho-emden.de (8.8.8/8.8.8/Debian/GNU) id TAA03478;
Fri, 24 Apr 1998 19:25:22 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 1998 19:25:22 +0200
From: Hartmut Koptein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org should support more archs for hamm
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from Daniel Martin at cush on Fri, Apr 24, 
1998 at 11:39:38AM -0400

Package: www.debian.org

Wishlist: For downloading packages more buttons for each arch. If the
  package is available then selectable, if not ...

   [alpha] [arm] [ia32] [m68k] [mips] [powerpc] [sparc]

Greetings,

   Hartmut
   

-- 
 Hartmut Koptein   EMail:
 Friedrich-van-Senden-Str. 7   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 26603 Aurich   
 Tel.: +49-4941-10390  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Received: (at 21620-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of 

Re: Suggestion for To-Do List Page

[Alexander Winston]

On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 14:38, Alexander Winston wrote:
> Currently, on , we have a list of
> things to be done that users and developers can work on, though some are
> fairly limited to developers. I propose adding
>  and especially
>  as
> things that can be assisted with by ordinary users or folks that do not
> have official Debian developer status yet.

On second thought, should I file this in the BTS instead?


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#155346: marked as done (packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package names when listing dependencies.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2002 20:02:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 03 15:02:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from f04s07.cac.psu.edu (f04n07.cac.psu.edu) [128.118.141.35] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17b56H-0006qp-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 15:02:09 -0500
Received: from frankenstein (tnt2-164-244.cac.psu.edu [130.203.164.244])
by f04n07.cac.psu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA383014;
Sat, 3 Aug 2002 16:01:49 -0400
Received: from torrent ([192.168.1.15])
by frankenstein with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 17b55o-hP-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 16:01:40 -0400
Received: from daniel by torrent with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17b55c-0005dm-00; Sat, 03 Aug 2002 16:01:28 -0400
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 16:01:28 -0400
From: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Bruce Pimenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aptitude 0.2.11.1-3
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 09:13:02PM +0200, Bruce Pimenta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was 
heard to say:
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/admin/aptitude.html
> 
> missing link to the related package:
> libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2
> 
> (aptitude 0.2.11.1-3 seems to need this package)

  Hi,

  The page you referenced is automatically generated from information
contained in the .deb file.  Even if I wanted to change it, I couldn't.

  libapt-pkg-libc6.2-3-2-3.2 is a virtual package, provided by the most
recent version of apt.  Because of this, "apt" is listed among the
dependencies of aptitude.  However, it would probably be useful if these
webpages noted when a dependency was via a virtual package, to reduce
this confusion.  I'm reporting a bug against www.debian.org with this
email, so someone will take a look at it.

  Daniel

-- 
/-- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
--\
|"Witches and pickles went together like...she hesitated at   |
| the stomach-curdling addition of peaches and cream, and |
| mentally substituted 'things that went together very well'" |
|  -- Terry Pratchett |
\ Be like the kid in the movie!  Play chess! -- http://www.uschess.org ---/

---
Received: (at 155346-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:05:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* 

Bug#23350: marked as done (it should be possible to download binaries for other architectures)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 1998 17:18:17 +
Received: (qmail 23361 invoked from network); 9 Jun 1998 17:18:16 -
Received: from server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (192.129.16.1)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 9 Jun 1998 17:18:16 -
Received: from isis.pi.fho-emden.de (ppp005asc.fho-emden.de [193.174.117.5]) by 
server.et-inf.fho-emden.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA11800 for <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Jun 1998 19:18:02 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by isis.pi.fho-emden.de (8.9.0/8.9.0/Debian/GNU) id RAA00775;
Tue, 9 Jun 1998 17:28:07 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 1998 17:28:07 +0200
From: Hartmut Koptein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: www.debian.org: adding download support
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91


Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist

Before or short after hamm is released, it should be possible to download 
binaries
(deb packages) also for m68k and other arch-types. 

This give us one problem: should all packages have the same release number? 

If say alpha has foo_7.6-23 and i386 (or ia32) has foo_7.6-19, should both
packages are downloadable or only the newer one? What about packages, that
aren't released for one arch and not for the other (or it is only available
for one arch and not for all)?

This must be checked for each update of www.debian.org and if a package isn't
available the download-button must be disabled. And for an older release
the user should be warned.

Thanks,

Hartmut


-- 
 Hartmut Koptein   EMail:
 Friedrich-van-Senden-Str. 7   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 26603 Aurich   
 Tel.: +49-4941-10390  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Received: (at 21620-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #2085

Bug#208513: marked as done (gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Sep 2003 10:31:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Sep 03 05:31:41 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (smtp.uc3m.es) [163.117.136.123] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uUvJ-RK-00; Wed, 03 Sep 2003 05:31:37 -0500
Received: from smtp03.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBFB434B8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from arpa.it.uc3m.es (arpa.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.120])
by smtp03.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09972B674
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed,  3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from oboe.it.uc3m.es ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [163.117.139.101])
by arpa.it.uc3m.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA32046
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by oboe.it.uc3m.es (8.11.6/8.11.0) id h83APtq04524
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200
From: "Peter T. Breuer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:25:55 +0200 (MET DST)
X-Anonymously-To: 
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gcc-2.95
Version: gcc-2.95_1:2.95.4-11woody1

On http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/gcc-2.95.html, the source
code link is not present. It says:

  View the list of files in gcc-2.95
  Check for bug reports about gcc-2.95
  Source Code: Not found

  Debian GCC maintainers ...


Nor can I locate it via ftping on over and looking. In fact, I am
having trouble locating source via ftp for any of stable.
ftp.debian.org only has a Sources.gz list in dist/stable/source


Peter


---
Received: (at 208513-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:29 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:05:28 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better par

Bug#225795: www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/xx is not updated now.

[Hideki Yamane]

Hi Denis,

>>  umm... http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/ja is 
>>  added its links, but not use update informaiton yet.
>
>Sorry if I was unclear, some scripts have to be enabled, but nobody
>knows when they will be again, this is out of my control.
>In the meantime, data are available at
>  http://people.debian.org/~barbier/intl/l10n/po-debconf/ja

 Yes, I understand that we can get updated information from 
 yourpage, Denis. but http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/xx
 is a kind of Official information, I think. Many people will
 see it.

 I hope webmasters make www.d.o update properly with all pages :)
 (so this post is for www.debian.org package.)




-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamanemailto:henrich @ samba.gr.jp/iijmio-mail.jp

packages.debian.org don't get right link for security

[Giacomo A. Catenazzi]

Hello.

The download for security fon't work: i.e. from:

http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/php4-dev

then I click "all" to download the package...it will give
me the normal mirror list, but the security packages
arenot there.

Please correct the script.

Ciao
cate

Re: packages.debian.org don't get right link for security

[Frank Lichtenheld]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:00:42PM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> The download for security fon't work: i.e. from:
> 
> http://packages.debian.org/stable/web/php4-dev
> 
> then I click "all" to download the package...it will give
> me the normal mirror list, but the security packages
> arenot there.
> 
> Please correct the script.

Thanks for the report. I think I found the error and am currently
testing the patch. Should be fixed soon.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/

Bug#146675: marked as done (Package description pages for pmud and pmud-utils unavailable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2002 21:31:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 11 16:31:11 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postal.netaxs.com [207.8.186.39] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 176eSN-0004Os-00; Sat, 11 May 2002 16:31:11 -0500
Received: from [207.106.60.74] (dyn-74.blackbox-3.netaxs.com [207.106.60.74])
by postal.netaxs.com (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id 
g4BLV87Y009695
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 11 May 2002 17:31:09 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 17:29:36 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: William  C Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Package description pages for pmud and pmud-utils unavailable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org

The description pages for the packages pmud and pmud-utils cannot be viewed,
even though these packages exist and can be downloaded.  Note that 
these packages
exist for the powerpc architecture only (in "testing")!

---
Received: (at 131631-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages

 Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big

* Minor fixes:

 Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
 Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone

 Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug  C

Bug#204099: marked as done (packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead to doubled dependencies)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Aug 2003 15:12:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 04 10:12:19 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 64-162-186-125.ded.pacbell.net (ftbfs.org) [64.162.186.125] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19jh0V-0004s7-00; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 10:12:19 -0500
Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19jh4u-0001ZM-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 04 Aug 2003 08:16:52 -0700
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 08:16:42 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: redundant dependency
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: lvs-kiss
Version: 1.32-1
Severity: minor

lvs-kiss depends on perl and libtime-hires-perl.  The latter is a
virtual package provided by perl, which results in two
dependencies on perl on the package page:

 http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/lvs-kiss.html

-- 
Matt

---
Received: (at 204099-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:05:27 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:05:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages

 Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big

* Minor fixes:

 Closes: #125976

Bug#131631: marked as done (packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are missing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2002 04:15:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 30 22:15:21 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cepheus.azstarnet.com [169.197.56.195] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16W8d7-Id-00; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 22:15:21 -0600
Received: from Obsession.azstarnet.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [169.197.10.182])
by cepheus.azstarnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA09292;
Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:15:16 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Sent-via: StarNet http://www.azstarnet.com/
Received: by Obsession.azstarnet.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 30 Jan 
2002 21:16:05 -0700
From: Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: packages.debian.org/mac-fdisk returns 404
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.41.14213
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.41.14213
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 21:16:05 -0700
Reply-To: Chris Tillman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: packages.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2002-01-30
Severity: normal

What the title said. The mac-fdisk maintainer believes this is an
i386-centric bug; mac-fdisk is powerpc only. 

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux Obsession 2.2.19 #1 Sat Apr 14 23:20:24 CDT 2001 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 131631-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages

 Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big

* Minor fixes:

 Closes: #125976: packages.debian.

Bug#227108: www.debian.org: Please include co-maintained packages in Project Participants Page

[David Nusinow]

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:58:52PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> tags 227108 unreproducible moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 01:23:44PM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
> > Please include co-maintained packages in the listing for each person on
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/people. This info is in the Uploaders:
> > field of debian/control for each package.
> 
> Huh? I see the co-maintained packages. Don't you?

I meant it like in bug 202157, which I didn't see when I scanned the
list. I'll close this bug since it's a duplicate without any extra info.
Sorry about that.

 - David Nusinow

Bug#141618: marked as done (non-i386 architecture specific packages are not browsable)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 21:02:12 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 20 16:02:12 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adamp.andrew.cmu.edu (adamp.coed.org) [128.2.121.219] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15YwBY-0005yi-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:02:12 -0500
Received: (qmail 5259 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Aug 2001 21:01:48 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Adam Pennington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Several architectures missing on the package search pages
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:01:48 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-20
Severity: normal

Several architectures are missing from the package search pages (ia64, and hppa
to name two)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux adamp 2.4.8-ac2 #4 SMP Mon Aug 13 10:24:51 EDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---
Received: (at 131631-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:06 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:06:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploaders 
Closes: #208513: gcc 2.95.4 source has disappeared

* Handle virtual packages

 Closes: #155346: packages.debian.org: Please include virtual package
names when listing dependencies.
 Closes: #204099: packages.debian.org: expanding virtual packages can lead
to doubled dependencies

* Create an alternative compressed text list of all packages

 Closes: #177669: packages.debian.org: allpackages.html lists are too big

* Minor fixes:

 Closes: #125976: packages.debian.org: it shouldn't print header for
related packages when none of them exist
 Closes: #162588: packages.debian.org: please add a last-modified timezone

 Closes: #219653: packages.d.o/experimental/ table formatting bug  Closes:
#221114: packages.debian.org: Spelling error in packages overview

I wil

Bug#135220: marked as done (packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and non-US/non-free mixed together)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2002 15:55:28 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 22 09:55:28 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tweety.fe.up.pt [193.136.28.27] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16eI2i-00080S-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:55:28 -0600
Received: from lorosae.fe.up.pt ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [193.136.28.35])
by tweety.fe.up.pt (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA15527
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:55:26 GMT
Received: from localhost (jev.fe.up.pt [192.168.62.120])
by lorosae.fe.up.pt (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g1MFtQx28183
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:55:26 GMT
Received: from villate by localhost with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16eI5c-0003CQ-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:58:28 +
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:58:27 +
From: "Jaime E. Villate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: non-US, non-US/contrib and non-US/non-free mixed together
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: "Jaime E. Villate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: www.debian.org
Version: 2002-02-22
Severity: normal

The sections non-US, non-US/contrib and non-US/non-free are being mixed
together in http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages

In "Search package directories", the section field only shows non-US, but no
non-US/contrib or non-US/non-free, and selecting "non-US" really searches the
3 sections. The page for a package in non-US/free, for instance,
  http://packages.debian.org/testing/non-us/speak-freely.html
displays the correct section (non-US/non-free) in its title, but in the URL
it is wrong.

Regards,
Jaime

---
Received: (at 135220-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2004 19:06:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 12 13:05:30 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AfKXZ-000319-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:56:41 -0600
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=webmail.sorgfalt.net)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1AfKXY-0007UF-00; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100
Received: from 217.234.62.246
(SquirrelMail authenticated user djpig.frank)
by webmail.sorgfalt.net with HTTP;
Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:56:40 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Status of packages.debian.org - new scripts installed
From: "Frank Lichtenheld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
References: 
In-Reply-To: 
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=4.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no 
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2004_1_5
X-Spam-Level: 

Yesterday the new packages.d.o scripts were installed. They include many
improvements and fix a few bugs (BCCed XXX-done@ with this mail):

* Contain information about non-i386 packages

 Closes:  #21620: packages.debian.org: download.pl: package download pages
should support multiple architectures
  Closes: #23350 merged bug
 Closes:  #83701: packages.debian.org: pages should say on what platforms
has a package been compiled
 Closes: #131631: packages.debian.org: pages for non-i386 packages are
missing
  Closes: #141618, #146675, #220218 merged bugs
 Closes: #215999: packages.debian.org: source not found if i386 is
outdated

* Include DDTP translations

* Better parsing/using of input data

 Closes: #109338: packages.debian.org: display the installed size, too 
Closes: #135220: packages.debian.org: non-US, non-US/contrib and
non-US/non-free mixed together
 Closes: #202157: packages.debian.org: pages should list uploader