Re: Bug#195105: www.debian.org: impossible to find linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.20-3-686
* Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-06 18:59]: > This part is bug #172055. Any news on this? From what I can see in that report is that joy asked you if you can help get the new swish++ running. I wonder what happened to the answer/efforts on this. So long, Alfie -- Jaja, Yggdrasil. LGX 1.0. Kernel 0.99.irgendwas. Herbst 1993. Damals hatte man noch alle Haare, alle Zähne und täglich Sex. Schön war das. Und heute? Heute hat man Windows 2000. Tja. -- Christian Anzenberger pgpEzsr41fic2.pgp Description: PGP signature
users page split update
Hi!
Please find attached my current working version for the splitted users
page. I've found out about how the devel/todo page does insert only one
entry, and tried to apply it. There is just one problem:
The tag gets executed before the diversion takes effect
and thus the entry is added twice to the toc list
I'm out of ideas here, help would be appreciated quite well.
There is one more smaller problem, the thing with the url doesn't work:
If I leave it the current way the href doesn't appear anywhere, if I
remove the space before the http://www.bond.edu.au/"";> Stupid thing, is
this buggy or is this "feature" documented somewhere?
So long, maybe someone can share some thoughts/ideas/efforts.
Alfie
--
use Mail::Signature;
$sig = Mail::Signature->new;
print $sig->random;
split.pl
Description: Perl program
%body
{#!TODO "([^a-zA-Z0-9_])" "_" >OUT#:
>
href="">
%body
:#TODO "([^a-zA-Z0-9_])" "_" >OUT#}
"([^a-zA-Z0-9_])"
"_" >/>/>>
# Insert only once
{#TODO "([^a-zA-Z0-9_])" "_" >OUT#}
"([^a-zA-Z0-9_])" "_" >=1
/>
# vim:ft=wml:
pgpXeibAP4rbk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: language debian website
* Denis Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-06 23:23]: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 01:12:45PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: >> Of course it can :) See it in the attached patch, the wording can of >> course be changed. Personally I would like to not have it as a html >> list but as a comma seperated list, but that unfortunately isn't >> possible with the toc template. > > Of course it can :) > In intro/cn.wml, I only added the > [%body] > line on your patched version. Cool :) I guess we can add it that way, any objections? So long, Alfie -- Wo wir schon bei Schnäppchenbestrafungen sind: ich finde § 307 StGB hat ein recht ordentliches Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis. Soviel Bums für sowenig Strafe gibt sonst nirgendwo. -- Holger Lembke in de.soc.recht.misc pgpwmk8jNMocO.pgp Description: PGP signature
packages.debian.org - status update
Hi. I included the old keywords line in the pages for packages.debian.org again. It should now work with the old swish/search_packages search solution. I'm now on "vacation" for a long weekend. Next week I will do some further polishing but the base is now somewhat stable. I wonder if it is possible to install the scripts on a debian machine along with swish so one could test if this will work. If anyone of the debwww team can make this happen (i.e. has the rights and the time), please contact me directly. For further information (and source code) see http://www.djpig.de/projekte/debian/packages A nearly actual version of the generated pages is visible at http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/~frank/packages/ Gruesse, -- *** Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> *** *** http://www.djpig.de/ *** see also: - http://www.usta.de/ - http://fachschaft.physik.uni-karlsruhe.de/ pgpPyjt3uTt16.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#204452: www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries.
Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-07 Severity: minor The web page under nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries, for both "being processed" and "waiting for DAM approval". The later one should be "waiting" with a new entry in the top level. Thanks -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux reypastor 2.4.21 #1 vie jun 13 22:28:10 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 -- Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.21 So I understand you wish to marry my wife. --Andrew Wyke (Sleuth)
Re: Bug#195105: www.debian.org: impossible to find linux-wlan-ng-modules-2.4.20-3-686
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 10:08:53AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-08-06 18:59]: > > This part is bug #172055. > > Any news on this? From what I can see in that report is that joy asked > you if you can help get the new swish++ running. I wonder what happened > to the answer/efforts on this. No, I haven't worked on it. -- Matt
listarchives becoming an alias again
Hi, Since several users who complained about their mails ending up in the archive have had their complaint end up in the -www archive, and there hasn't been any noticeable benefit from having listarchives an alias for -www, I'm reverting it back. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
passwd file inconsistent with CVS
Hi, --- passwd-from-cvs Thu Aug 7 10:48:20 2003 +++ passwd-from-gluck Thu Aug 7 10:49:10 2003 @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ djpig:<...>:treacy linnando:<...>:treacy rkrastev:<...>:treacy -trm:<...>:treacy marteaut:<...>:treacy fenio:<...>:treacy +gmontesino:<...>:treacy +micah:<...>:treacy This needs to be committed to CVS! If it doesn't get commited within the next day or so, I am going to remove them. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: New version of nm-step2
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:17:22AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:46:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Some time ago I wrote a new version of the devel/join/nm-step2 page. > > After asking for a first feedback I've forgotten this. > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2003/debian-www-200308/msg00065.html > > > > > The applicant can provide a digital image of an ID signed > > with his GPG key. This image should be send to his > > Application Manager (AM). > > As I have read debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org, there were strong > opposition to this type of prone to abuse GPG signing procedure. If we > keep this alternative GPG verification method in updated nm-step2 page, > we may want to change this something like: I, for one, would rather not have this presented here, but instead leave it to the AM to decide whether to suggest it to an applicant or not. I've had one or two applicants who should have waited before applying, until they had an opportunity to get their keys signed. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- | pgpGMS1RBvwda.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Web Pages TODO List - Security
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:38:19AM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > > ## This change allows "Vulnerable" to be "Yes" and "Security database > > ## reference" to be displayed. > > --- security/undated/1ssh.data.old Thu Apr 19 09:52:11 2001 > > +++ security/undated/1ssh.data.new Sat Jul 19 17:37:41 2003 > > @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ > > ssh > > undated > > +CA-1998-03 > > ssh > > -Yes > > +yes > > Yes > > > > #use wml::debian::security > > Why do you change the case of "yes"? It's a semi-random bug fix, cf. security template which says " "yes" ""> " "no" ""> -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: norwegian or german
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 10:38:33AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > This poppes up every now and then on this list, there was a huge > discussion some months ago where someone offered to patch Apache so it > is possible to set a Default order if someone requests *, but that > thread somehow vanished Apache 1.3 isn't likely to get changed to alleviate let alone fix this. Apache 2.0 has a wee bit of a workaround but we all know how well deployed that is... > > I think it is a bug to return a random locale instead of english, isn't it? > > If the user requests _any_ (and that is what he does if he sends *) he > shouldn't be surprised if he gets any. No, it's not a bug, it's a > feature. A misfeature. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: Debian WWW CVS commit by joy: webwml/english/devel constitution.wml
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 06:02:17PM +0200, Kaare Olsen wrote: > > Modified files: > > english/devel : constitution.wml > > > > Log message: > > added a few missing links, reported by Rico Gloeckner > > This reminded me of something I noticed during the previous update: There > are two "A.1" appendices, named "Proposal" and "Discussion and Amendment", > respectively. > > Does anyone know whether there's a good explanation for this, or is it a > mistake? Ask Ian Jackson? :) I think it's a simple mistake. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Re: error
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:17:10PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > >> there is an error in > >> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/lvs-kiss.html > >> namely perl was doubled > > > > It depends on both perl and libtime-hires-perl; the latter is a > > virtual package provided by perl. Is this is a bug in the package > > scripts or the package dependencies? > > Rather the package dependencies. libtime-hires-perl made it to a core > library from 5.6 to 5.8 IIRC, so the dependency is missing in there. If I get this right, I don't think that's a bug. Keeping the virtual package for that specific functionality sounds like a perfectly normal idea -- it makes the package work both with old and new Perl. -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Bug#202303: www.debian.org: /devel/join/newmaint should encourage to contribute before applying
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 10:10:25PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I would remove the sentence "and in this context not necessarily the > best either." but apply the rest of it. > > > --- newmaint.wml18 Jul 2003 08:56:25 - 1.44 > > +++ newmaint.wml21 Jul 2003 16:54:05 - > > -If you want to do something for Debian but without becoming a developer, > > -there are several other ways in which you can help. > > +Please note that it is not necessary to become a developer before > > +contributing to Debian. It is actually much more likely that you will be > > +accepted if you have contributed a significant amount of work before. > > Packaging > > +software for Debian is not the only way that you can help, and in this > > context > > +not necessarily the best either. There is a lot of other > > work > > +that needs to be done that will get you accustomed to Debian, it's > > developers > > +and ways to handle things. So... post the final wording? -- 2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Processed: [joy@srce.hr: Re: error]
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 204099 www.debian.org Bug#204099: redundant dependency Bug reassigned from package `lvs-kiss' to `www.debian.org'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: New version of nm-step2
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 06:02:28PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 05:17:22AM +0200, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 09:46:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > Some time ago I wrote a new version of the devel/join/nm-step2 page. > > > After asking for a first feedback I've forgotten this. > > > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2003/debian-www-200308/msg00065.html > > > > > > > > The applicant can provide a digital image of an ID signed > > > with his GPG key. This image should be send to his > > > Application Manager (AM). > > > > As I have read debian-newmaint@lists.debian.org, there were strong > > opposition to this type of prone to abuse GPG signing procedure. If we ^^ > > keep this alternative GPG verification method in updated nm-step2 page, > > we may want to change this something like: > > > > I, for one, would rather not have this presented here, but instead > leave it to the AM to decide whether to suggest it to an applicant or > not. I've had one or two applicants who should have waited before > applying, until they had an opportunity to get their keys signed. I prefer this too :-) That's why I started with "If" and phrased with "last resort". With following paragraph mentioning discussion, we really avoid this type of GPG practice. Osamu > -- > .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield > : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | > `. `' | >`- -><- |
Bug#204452: marked as done (www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries.)
Your message dated Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:10 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#204452: www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries. has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2003 12:43:45 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 07 07:43:43 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (reypastor.hispalinux.es) [213.229.161.44] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19kk7L-0007Gn-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:43:43 -0500 Received: by reypastor.hispalinux.es (Postfix, from userid 1019) id 41C751A94A4; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:43:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:43:42 +0200 From: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.6 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: www.debian.org Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-07 Severity: minor The web page under nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries, for both "being processed" and "waiting for DAM approval". The later one should be "waiting" with a new entry in the top level. Thanks -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux reypastor 2.4.21 #1 vie jun 13 22:28:10 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69 -- Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.21 So I understand you wish to marry my wife. --Andrew Wyke (Sleuth) --- Received: (at 204452-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2003 00:19:04 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 07 19:18:49 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from host-66-81-196-145.rev.o1.com (ftbfs.org) [66.81.196.145] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19kuxw-0004CL-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:18:44 -0500 Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 19kv2E-00085Y-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:23:10 -0700 Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:10 -0700 From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#204452: www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries. Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.5 required=4.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:43:42PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote: > The web page under nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries, > for both "being processed" and "waiting for DAM approval". > > The later one should be "waiting" with a new entry in the top level. Fixed, thank for reporting. -- Matt
