Your message dated Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:10 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204452: www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains
two "processed" entries.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Aug 2003 12:43:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 07 07:43:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (reypastor.hispalinux.es) [213.229.161.44]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19kk7L-0007Gn-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 07:43:43 -0500
Received: by reypastor.hispalinux.es (Postfix, from userid 1019)
id 41C751A94A4; Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:43:42 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 14:43:42 +0200
From: Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed"
entries.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.6 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2003-08-07
Severity: minor
The web page under nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries,
for both "being processed" and "waiting for DAM approval".
The later one should be "waiting" with a new entry in the top level.
Thanks
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux reypastor 2.4.21 #1 vie jun 13 22:28:10 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jesus Climent | Unix SysAdm | Helsinki, Finland | pumuki.hispalinux.es
GPG: 1024D/86946D69 BB64 2339 1CAA 7064 E429 7E18 66FC 1D7F 8694 6D69
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Registered Linux user #66350 proudly using Debian Sid & Linux 2.4.21
So I understand you wish to marry my wife.
--Andrew Wyke (Sleuth)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204452-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2003 00:19:04 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Aug 07 19:18:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-66-81-196-145.rev.o1.com (ftbfs.org) [66.81.196.145]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19kuxw-0004CL-00; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 19:18:44 -0500
Received: from kraai by catalunya with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19kv2E-00085Y-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 07 Aug 2003 17:23:10 -0700
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 17:23:10 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#204452: www.debian.org: nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two
"processed" entries.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-14.5 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:43:42PM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> The web page under nm.debian.org/nmlist.php contains two "processed" entries,
> for both "being processed" and "waiting for DAM approval".
>
> The later one should be "waiting" with a new entry in the top level.
Fixed, thank for reporting.
--
Matt
