Re: AM Final Report for Beiad Dalton
Guillaume Morin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Dans un message du 25 Mar à 0:02, Adrian Bunk écrivait : >> He sent altogether mails to debian-policy in the last three months. i >> can't see: >> - Which skills valuable for Debian did he show? >> - What does he need an account for? > >He showed that 1) He is interested in policy issues, 2) he plans to help >us. It is an important issue. While people do need to be developers in order to propose and second policy bugs, I don't think we ought to be bringing people into the project simply to work on policy: our policy people should have experience of their subject matter, otherwise it's just so much unimplementable hot air (note that Manoj, Julian, Santiago, Anthony, et al are experienced packagers). To that end, Beiad's packaging skills seem more relevant. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AM report for Jeremy Bouse
Summary for Jeremy Bouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Identity GPG key signed by Debian developer Stephen R. Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: pub 1024D/3DC9F946 1999-11-30 Jeremy T. Bouse (JB5713) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig! B4D6B0F1 1999-12-09 Stephen R. Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig! 3DC9F946 1999-11-30 Jeremy T. Bouse (JB5713) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig! CEEE20A5 1999-12-01 Jeremy T. Bouse (JB5713) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig! 922AF81A 1999-12-09 Stephen R. Gore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig! E83D9AE5 1999-12-01 Jeremy Bouse (JB5713) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sub 1024g/E4E6E7CB 1999-11-30 sig! 3DC9F946 1999-11-30 Jeremy T. Bouse (JB5713) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philosophy & Procedures --- Answered questions about NMUs, BTS, and various licensing problems. Agrees to abide to DMUP and explained DFSG and social contract in own words. Explains the difference between free beer and free speech. P&P check passed. Tasks & Skills -- Jeremy has contributed to the free software community both as a Linux activist (ie- volunteered with ALS, assisting at install fest and getogethers host'd by local companies such as Linux General Store in Atlanta). He has also contributed to fwbuilder, for which he already submitted and ITP. The packaging is good. Recommendation -- I recommend that Jeremy be accepted as a Debian maintainer. Debian login: jbouse Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gergely Nagy \ mhp/|8] -- -=]| [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[=- . Powered by bread 'n water . pgpeoxkYUzEd7.pgp Description: PGP signature
AM report for David Starner
Summary for David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Identity pub 1024D/2E54EFC6 2001-01-28 David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sig! 137A955E 2001-02-14 Mike Mattice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Philosophy & Procedures --- David understands Debian's philosophy and agrees with it. Tasks & Skills -- David has two sponsored packages in Debian already. I looked at one of them and it was well done. Recommendation -- I recommend that David be accepted as a Debian maintainer. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] pgpUQ4qaFqdE5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: translation-check
El Mié 21 Mar 2001 18:22, peter karlsson escribió: > Hi! > > There are still a few languages that have not yet switched over to use > translation-check instead of the syntax. Is > there any good reason for this, or should I just patch all the files? I don't know really. In spanish/, there's several files with the old syntax, for example. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/paginas/webwml/spanish$ find . -type f -name \*.wml | xargs grep -e --translation|wc -l 41 Are you just thinking to patch all the files in all the different languages? Best regards, Ender. -- Why is a cow? Mu. (Omm) -- Responsable de News - Newsmanager Servicios de red - Network services Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIRIS Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Madrid (Spain) Tlf 91.585.49.05
Re: Bug#90649: marked as done (machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor)
El Jue 22 Mar 2001 17:38, Debian Bug Tracking System escribió: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:48:31PM -0800, Shane Wegner wrote: > > Package: www.debian.org > > Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-21 > > Severity: normal > > > > When accessing http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, it returns > > "Bad file descriptor". No html is returned at all. > > Please use the appropriate address for db.debian.org maintainers, this is > the wrong one. What do you mean? From /devel/index.html: [...] Using the database, you can see the list of http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi";>project machines, [...] I also reported this problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED], because "Bad file descriptor" is returned with every query. Sincerely, David. -- Why is a cow? Mu. (Omm) -- Responsable de News - Newsmanager Servicios de red - Network services Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIRIS Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Madrid (Spain) Tlf 91.585.49.05
Re: translation-check
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:26:29PM +0200, David Martinez wrote: > El Mié 21 Mar 2001 18:22, peter karlsson escribió: > > There are still a few languages that have not yet switched over to use > > translation-check instead of the syntax. Is > > there any good reason for this, or should I just patch all the files? > > I don't know really. In spanish/, there's several files with the old > syntax, > for example. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian/paginas/webwml/spanish$ find . -type f -name > \*.wml | > xargs grep -e --translation|wc -l > 41 Hi David, In the Spanish team we have already switched over to using translation-check: webwml/spanish$ find . -type f -name \*.wml | xargs grep -e debian::translation-check | wc -l 104 (most of those 104 counts are your own commits :-) What happens is that in some files we've written the comment in addition to using the translation-check script (this extra comment makes no difference). As I understand it, the national teams who have not made the transition should go and change all of their files to make use of translation-check. Greetings, Jaime
Bug#91791: www.debian.org: db.debian.org reports "Bad file descriptor"
Package: www.debian.org Version: 20010326 Severity: normal I get the message "Bad file descriptor" trying to search on db.debian.org. There isn't a pseudo-package listed for db.debian.org to report a bug against, I hope this is OK. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux lilith 2.2.18 #1 Thu Mar 22 21:48:40 GMT 2001 i686 unknown
Bug#91791: www.debian.org: db.debian.org reports "Bad file descriptor"
El Lun 26 Mar 2001 19:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > Package: www.debian.org > Version: 20010326 > Severity: normal > > I get the message "Bad file descriptor" trying to search on db.debian.org. > There isn't a pseudo-package listed for db.debian.org to report a bug > against, I hope this is OK. But if you look at: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=db.debian.org you will find a bug against db.debian.org. Maybe http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages should reflect it? BTW, I've experienced the same error several hours ago. Be well, David. -- Why is a cow? Mu. (Omm) -- Responsable de News - Newsmanager Servicios de red - Network services Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIRIS Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Madrid (Spain) Tlf 91.585.49.05
pseudo-packages list updated
I don't know who is maintaining the pseudo-packages list, but they may want to know that I added an entry for db.debian.org -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: translation-check
David Martinez: > Are you just thinking to patch all the files in all the different > languages? Exactly. -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
Bug#91791: www.debian.org: db.debian.org reports "Bad file descriptor"
On 20010326T194207+0200, David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS wrote: > But if you look at: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=db.debian.org > > you will find a bug against db.debian.org. Maybe > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages should reflect it? There is no db.debian.org pseudo-package and there will not be one. See bug #67907. -- %%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED] % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
Bug#91791: www.debian.org: db.debian.org reports "Bad file descriptor"
El Lun 26 Mar 2001 20:22, escribiste: > On 20010326T194207+0200, David Martinez CSIC RedIRIS wrote: > > But if you look at: > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=db.debian.org > > > > you will find a bug against db.debian.org. Maybe > > http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages should reflect it? > > There is no db.debian.org pseudo-package and there will not be one. > See bug #67907. Yes, I see. But the bug I spoke about is #89467...it turns that bugs.d.o accepts bug reports for any package, even if there isn't any maintainer or responsable or even any previous existance of it? Be well, David. -- Why is a cow? Mu. (Omm) -- Responsable de News - Newsmanager Servicios de red - Network services Centro de Comunicaciones CSIC/RedIRIS Spanish Academic Network for Research and Development Madrid (Spain) Tlf 91.585.49.05
Processed: bug reassignment
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 91791 db.debian.org Bug#91791: www.debian.org: db.debian.org reports "Bad file descriptor" Bug reassigned from package `www.debian.org' to `db.debian.org'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: Bug#90649: marked as done (machines.cgi reports bad file descriptor)
On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 05:31:48PM +0200, David Martinez wrote: > > > Package: www.debian.org > > > Version: N/A; reported 2001-03-21 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > When accessing http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi, it returns > > > "Bad file descriptor". No html is returned at all. > > > > Please use the appropriate address for db.debian.org maintainers, this is > > the wrong one. > > What do you mean? From /devel/index.html: > > [...] >Using the database, you can see the list of href="http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi";>project machines, > [...] > > I also reported this problem to [EMAIL PROTECTED], because "Bad file > descriptor" > is returned with every query. There's no point in removing the link when it's obvious the problem is transient/temporary. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
