WNPP
Hi! I noted this in the WML logs on klecker (I got the same locally, so then I checked the originals): make[3]: Entering directory `/org/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/wnpp' test -d ../../../../debian.org/devel/wnpp || mkdir -m g+w -p ../../../../debian.org/devel/wnpp wml -q wnpp.wml ePerl:Error: Perl runtime error (interpreter rc=107) Contents of STDERR channel: - Can't call method "bind" on an undefined value at ./../../../english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl line 47. -- ** WML:Break: Error in Pass 3 (rc=74). Can someone who knows about this look into it? -- \\// peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/ Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: http://www.softwolves.pp.se/peter/reklampost.html
Bug#80389: kill FOM already then..
>On Sat, Dec 23, 2000 at 05:58:31PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote: >> Do we have anyone to actively maintain this stuff? seeS? It's >> kinda annoying >> and seems a bit redundant when there's debianhelp.org et al... > >My vote is to nuke the FOM ( and I got the bugger up and working >before :) hm, that was in december, guess it was forgotten about, FOM is still up, maybe someone can take it down, and remove the plugs from the contact page? -- Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG ID: 54D81666 Debian/GNU OS: http://www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> magnus frater spectat te - encrypt whenever possible
Processed: merging www.d.o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 38922 72900 Bug#38922: changelog via web Bug#72900: www.debian.org: cgi-bin/get-copyright and get-changelog CGIs not working properly Bug#39452: No changelog Bug#56947: can't view package changelogs Bug#32214: stale changelog links Bug#63324: changelog link views wrong changelogs Bug#70659: get-changelog displays very outdated info Merged 32214 38922 39452 56947 63324 70659 72900. > merge 32214 72900 Bug#32214: stale changelog links Bug#72900: www.debian.org: cgi-bin/get-copyright and get-changelog CGIs not working properly Bug#38922: changelog via web Bug#39452: No changelog Bug#56947: can't view package changelogs Bug#63324: changelog link views wrong changelogs Bug#70659: get-changelog displays very outdated info Merged 32214 38922 39452 56947 63324 70659 72900. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#82366: marked as done (www.debian.org: Typo in /security/2001/dsa-011)
Your message dated Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:34 -1000 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line I don't see any "tech" in DSA-011 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2001 02:52:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 20:52:02 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from scully.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.3] by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14HzkY-0007Uf-00; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:52:02 -0600 Received: (qmail 29081 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2001 02:49:47 - Received: from acs-24-154-30-144.zoominternet.net (HELO bill.localdomain) (24.154.30.144) by scully.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 15 Jan 2001 02:49:47 - Received: from john by bill.localdomain with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 14HzkX-ZI-00; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:52:01 -0500 From: John Dalbec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: www.debian.org: Typo in /security/2001/dsa-011 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:52:01 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: www.debian.org Version: 20010115 Severity: normal There's no "tech" in architecture, at least not in the US. I looked at some websites on British-American equivalents and could find no evidence for this spelling in the UK. -- System Information Debian Release: 2.2 Kernel Version: Linux bill 2.2.17 #1 Wed Dec 20 19:30:40 EST 2000 i586 unknown --- Received: (at 82366-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2001 14:14:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 29 08:14:41 2001 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu [:::128.171.11.7] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 14NF4q-0006ky-00; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:14:40 -0600 Received: from uhhepr.phys.hawaii.edu (uhhepr.phys.hawaii.edu [128.171.11.5]) by uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA20452 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:35 -1000 (HST) Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by uhhepr.phys.hawaii.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id EAA28400 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:35 -1000 (HST) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:34 -1000 From: Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: I don't see any "tech" in DSA-011 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >There's no "tech" in architecture, at least not in the US. I looked at some >websites on British-American equivalents and could find no evidence for this >spelling in the UK. http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-011 http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-01/msg0.html I don't see "Architechture" (I assume that's what you meant?) anywhere. I see.. "Architecture-independent component:" which looks fine to me. closed. -- Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG ID: 54D81666 Debian/GNU OS: http://www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> magnus frater spectat te - encrypt whenever possible
Processed: missed one..
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > merge 72900 81125 Bug#72900: www.debian.org: cgi-bin/get-copyright and get-changelog CGIs not working properly Bug#81125: changelog view on packages.debian.org does not work Bug#32214: stale changelog links Bug#38922: changelog via web Bug#39452: No changelog Bug#56947: can't view package changelogs Bug#63324: changelog link views wrong changelogs Bug#70659: get-changelog displays very outdated info Merged 32214 38922 39452 56947 63324 70659 72900 81125. > -- Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Darren Benham (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: WNPP
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:32:43AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > I noted this in the WML logs on klecker (I got the same locally, so > then I checked the originals): > > > make[3]: Entering directory `/org/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/wnpp' > test -d ../../../../debian.org/devel/wnpp || mkdir -m g+w -p > ../../../../debian.org/devel/wnpp > wml -q wnpp.wml > ePerl:Error: Perl runtime error (interpreter rc=107) > > Contents of STDERR channel: - > Can't call method "bind" on an undefined value at > ./../../../english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl line 47. > -- > ** WML:Break: Error in Pass 3 (rc=74). > > > Can someone who knows about this look into it? Could you please change line 49 of wnpp.pl to read $ldap = Net::LDAP->new($server, 'port' => $port) or die "$@"; and run it again? This should be a little more informative about the failure (at least according to the perl-ldap POD). Matt
Re: WNPP
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:32:43AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > Hi! > > I noted this in the WML logs on klecker (I got the same locally, so > then I checked the originals): > > > make[3]: Entering directory `/org/www.debian.org/webwml/english/devel/wnpp' > test -d ../../../../debian.org/devel/wnpp || mkdir -m g+w -p > ../../../../debian.org/devel/wnpp > wml -q wnpp.wml > ePerl:Error: Perl runtime error (interpreter rc=107) > It appears that the ldap server on bugs.debian.org is down. To help if this happens in the future wnpp.pl has been modified to use the line: $ldap = Net::LDAP->new($server, 'port' => $port) or die "Couldn't make connection to ldap server: $@"; I'll see if I can find someone who knows something about ldap to figure out what is wrong with the ldap server. -- James (Jay) Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WNPP
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 07:32:43AM +0100, peter karlsson wrote: > I noted this in the WML logs on klecker (I got the same locally, so > then I checked the originals): > > wml -q wnpp.wml > ePerl:Error: Perl runtime error (interpreter rc=107) > > Contents of STDERR channel: - > Can't call method "bind" on an undefined value at > ./../../../english/devel/wnpp/wnpp.pl line 47. > -- > ** WML:Break: Error in Pass 3 (rc=74). > > Can someone who knows about this look into it? I've already mailed people who ought to know what's up yesterday... -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Bug#80389: kill FOM already then..
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:06:09AM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > >> Do we have anyone to actively maintain this stuff? seeS? It's > >> kinda annoying > >> and seems a bit redundant when there's debianhelp.org et al... > > > >My vote is to nuke the FOM ( and I got the bugger up and working > >before :) > > hm, that was in december, guess it was forgotten about, FOM is still > up, maybe someone can take it down, and remove the plugs from the > contact page? I guess you're right, there's no point in delaying the removal any longer. I'll go get rid of it now. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
