Your message dated Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:34 -1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line I don't see any "tech" in DSA-011
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2001 02:52:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 20:52:02 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from scully.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.3]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14HzkY-0007Uf-00; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 20:52:02 -0600
Received: (qmail 29081 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2001 02:49:47 -0000
Received: from acs-24-154-30-144.zoominternet.net (HELO bill.localdomain)
(24.154.30.144)
by scully.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 15 Jan 2001 02:49:47 -0000
Received: from john by bill.localdomain with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 14HzkX-0000ZI-00; Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:52:01 -0500
From: John Dalbec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Typo in /security/2001/dsa-011
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.2.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2001 21:52:01 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20010115
Severity: normal
There's no "tech" in architecture, at least not in the US. I looked at some
websites on British-American equivalents and could find no evidence for this
spelling in the UK.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Kernel Version: Linux bill 2.2.17 #1 Wed Dec 20 19:30:40 EST 2000 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 82366-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2001 14:14:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 29 08:14:41 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu [::ffff:128.171.11.7]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14NF4q-0006ky-00; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:14:40 -0600
Received: from uhhepr.phys.hawaii.edu (uhhepr.phys.hawaii.edu [128.171.11.5])
by uhheph.phys.hawaii.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA20452
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:35 -1000 (HST)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by uhhepr.phys.hawaii.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id EAA28400
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:35 -1000 (HST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:14:34 -1000
From: Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I don't see any "tech" in DSA-011
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>There's no "tech" in architecture, at least not in the US. I looked at some
>websites on British-American equivalents and could find no evidence for this
>spelling in the UK.
http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-011
http://lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce-01/msg00000.html
I don't see "Architechture" (I assume that's what you meant?)
anywhere.
I see..
"Architecture-independent component:"
which looks fine to me. closed.
--
Brian Russo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPG ID: 54D81666
Debian/GNU OS: http://www.debian.org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
magnus frater spectat te - encrypt whenever possible
