Bug#416263: RFA: file -- Determines file type using "magic" numbers
Am Montag, den 26.03.2007, 16:08 +0200 schrieb Daniel Baumann: > I would like to adopt file if you agree. No objections, it is yours. -- |=| Michael Piefel |=| Member of the Debian project -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329631: Debian and toolchain for TI MSP430, time to get one source?
Hi. I would love to see this in the official repositories as well. I would share the debian/* directories of the MSP binutils and the tinyos packages I have created. Integration with avr toolchain would be nice as well. But as those were the first deb packages I created, I doubt that they are mature enough. I guess we would need a more experienced packager for this. BR, Markus On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > Hallo. It's nice, that there are deb repositories of msp430 toolchain. > Why not to continue effort and get this stuff in the official debian archive? > > Thanks! > _ > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410061: please move to contrib
On 24-Mar-2007 23:44.02 (GMT), Robert Millan wrote: > > Never the less, if it's decided that nspluginwrapper should go into > > contrib, > > then into contrib it should go. > I suppose that we're deciding that as we speak :-) I neglected to mention, I updated the package found at http://choralone.org/debian/n/nspluginwrapper/ last night, and it sets its section as "contrib/utils". -- rob andrews :: pgp 0x01e00563 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#410061: please move to contrib
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 11:46:00AM +0100, Rob Andrews wrote: > On 24-Mar-2007 23:44.02 (GMT), Robert Millan wrote: > > > Never the less, if it's decided that nspluginwrapper should go into > contrib, > > > then into contrib it should go. > > I suppose that we're deciding that as we speak :-) > > I neglected to mention, I updated the package found at > http://choralone.org/debian/n/nspluginwrapper/ last night, and it sets its > section as "contrib/utils". Ah, that is good. Thank you. -- Robert Millan My spam trap is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Note: this address is only intended for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 410970 pending Bug#410970: ITP: kirocker -- Kicker applet that displays what you listen to in Amarok. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 412473 pending Bug#412473: ITP: sineshaper -- Monophonic synth plugin with two oscillators and waveshapers. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416379: RFP: remuco -- mobile phone remote music control
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: remuco
Version : 0.4.3 (server), 0.5.0 (client)
Upstream Author : masala |at| web |dot| de
URL : http://remuco.sourceforge.net/
License : GPL
Description : mobile phone remote music control
>From the web page:
"Remuco is a system to remotely control Linux music
players with JavaME capable mobile devices via Bluetooth."
Packager should package both server and client. The server
runs on Linux and communicates with either amarok,
rhythmbox, xmms, or xmms2. The client ("legacy", "simple",
or "canvas") runs on a JavaME capable mobile phone.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416379: remuco -- mobile phone remote music control
Btw. upstream already provides Ubuntu packages, so hopefully packaging for Debian is easy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416380: ITP: gtk-vim-syntax -- Syntax file to highlight gtk+ keywords in vim
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist * Package name : gtk-vim-syntax Version : 20061121 Upstream Author : David Necas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1000 * License : Public domain Description : Syntax file to highlight gtk+ keywords in vim A collection of C extension syntax files for xlib, glib, gobject, gdk, gdk-pixbuf, gtk+, atk, pango, cairo, gimp, libgnome, libgnomecanvas, libgnomeui, libglade, gtkglext, vte, linc, gconf, and ORBit. pgpcfAoI0pr75.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 416380 ! Bug#416380: ITP: gtk-vim-syntax -- Syntax file to highlight gtk+ keywords in vim Owner recorded as Laurent Bigonville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416263: marked as done (RFA: file -- Determines file type using "magic" numbers)
Your message dated Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:47:04 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#416263: fixed in file 4.20-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: wnpp Severity: normal I request an adopter for the file package. file is of priority standard and comes with a library and thus the following additional packages are generated from the source: libmagic-dev, libmagic1 and python-magic. I believe the package to be in pretty good shape, even if the bug count suggests otherwise; most bugs are requests for the addition of new entries in the magic database and are not that urgent. The package description is: File tests each argument in an attempt to classify it. There are three sets of tests, performed in this order: filesystem tests, magic number tests, and language tests. The first test that succeeds causes the file type to be printed. . Starting with version 4, the file command is not much more than a wrapper around the "magic" library. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: file Source-Version: 4.20-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of file, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: file_4.20-2.diff.gz to pool/main/f/file/file_4.20-2.diff.gz file_4.20-2.dsc to pool/main/f/file/file_4.20-2.dsc file_4.20-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/file/file_4.20-2_i386.deb libmagic-dev_4.20-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/file/libmagic-dev_4.20-2_i386.deb libmagic1_4.20-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/file/libmagic1_4.20-2_i386.deb python-magic_4.20-2_i386.deb to pool/main/f/file/python-magic_4.20-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated file package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:28:00 +0100 Source: file Binary: libmagic1 file libmagic-dev python-magic Architecture: source i386 Version: 4.20-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: file - Determines file type using "magic" numbers libmagic-dev - File type determination library using "magic" numbers (developmen libmagic1 - File type determination library using "magic" numbers python-magic - File type determination library using "magic" numbers (python bin Closes: 416263 Changes: file (4.20-2) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (Closes: #416263). * Redone debian directory. Files: fa84a9a2602020e648a91fb336d35a5a 678 utils standard file_4.20-2.dsc f76b48269d984042d319b908d144f011 25120 utils standard file_4.20-2.diff.gz 00416acafcf5fda6556f8dd9c5551b29 37126 utils standard file_4.20-2_i386.deb 23d1783c54816d30e075c35fd9182198 320480 libs standard libmagic1_4.20-2_i386.deb 3a512971ba69d2080f81159c2f2d7fa6 61386 libdevel optional libmagic-dev_4.20-2_i386.deb 91b4bf6f30f8d7af975b226ed5cc1c4e 25018 python extra python-magic_4.20-2_i386.deb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGCRxX+C5cwEsrK54RAuosAKCyL6XCPS/dEX8Vzs+ceP7Wg0Hg9QCfT33A pOPYFcP7R21GbapC+AWrEEQ= =lOPx -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
Bug#376431: I tar'ed up my work from last year on packaging Open Watcom today
I made a tarball of my work from last year on packaging Open Watcom. I doubt I will ever work on it further. It contains a control file, a rules file (I don't know how well it works), and a TODO file. The rules and TODO files contain useful tips for anyone who ever wants to package OW. The tarball is an attachment on the following webpage: http://bugzilla.openwatcom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705 As I mentioned earlier in this ITP, Open Watcom requires various environment variables to be set before use, which goes against Debian policy. I filed 3 bugs today against Open Watcom requesting that this be fixed for wcc, wcc386, wccaxp, wpp, wpp386, wppaxp, and wlink. I bet more than just those 7 tools need to be fixed, but they are the most important of the Watcom tools. The relevant bugs are: http://bugzilla.openwatcom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706 - for wcc, wcc386, wccaxp http://bugzilla.openwatcom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707 - for wpp, wpp386, and wppaxp http://bugzilla.openwatcom.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708 - for wlink -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376431: FYI: There are unofficial Debian packages of OW available
All: FYI, I just found out today that someone named blairdude has kindly made unofficial .debs (and .rpms made with Alien) for Open Watcom available. I haven't tried them. They appear to be .debs of a few-month-old release candidate of OW. They are available at: http://blairdude.googlepages.com/list.html I didn't know about them when I did my own (incomplete) work on packaging OW, so they have nothing to do with my own packaging work I mentioned previous posts to this ITP. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329631: Debian and toolchain for TI MSP430, time to get one source?
i've been talking to a debian developer about this. there is a fair amount of red tape that packages must meet, and he is looking into it what should be submitted and how. as of now, i'll be maintaining our current ubuntu packages and trying to come up with a more mature packaging environment. -leith Markus Becker wrote: Hi. I would love to see this in the official repositories as well. I would share the debian/* directories of the MSP binutils and the tinyos packages I have created. Integration with avr toolchain would be nice as well. But as those were the first deb packages I created, I doubt that they are mature enough. I guess we would need a more experienced packager for this. BR, Markus On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: Hallo. It's nice, that there are deb repositories of msp430 toolchain. Why not to continue effort and get this stuff in the official debian archive? Thanks! _ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416397: ITP: haproxy -- fast and reliable load balancing reverse proxy
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Arnaud Cornet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * Package name: haproxy Version : 1.2.17 Upstream Author : Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://haproxy.1wt.eu/ * License : GPL Description : fast and reliable load balancing reverse proxy HAProxy is a TCP/HTTP reverse proxy which is particularly suited for high availability environments. It features connection persistence through HTTP cookies, load balancing, header addition, modification, deletion both ways. It has request blocking capabilities and provides interface to display server status. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-sexy Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: FoF package for Debian
Hi, We finally got in touch with the Teosto lawyer, and he informed us that unfortunately the game's music can't be distributed with a CC license. The problem is while the songs can freely be distributed with the game, they can't be distributed or otherwise used independently of the game without a specific license from Teosto. I wonder if we could draft a license that would fulfill this condition? - Sami -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: your mail
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > owner 410556 ! Bug#410556: ITP: openmsx-debugger -- graphical debugger for openMSX Owner changed from joost yervante damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Joost Yervante Damad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#329631: Debian and toolchain for TI MSP430, time to get one source?
On 3/27/07, leith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i've been talking to a debian developer about this. there is a fair amount of red tape that packages must meet, and he is looking into it what should be submitted and how. as of now, i'll be maintaining our current ubuntu packages and trying to come up with a more mature packaging environment. You all have come thru some steps already. I've always bored quickly, reading debian packaging docs. Now something is ready. Thus, getting more people aware of it, BTS, patches, announces in msp-gcc list and things may go a little bit faster. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#416436: ITP: dfu-programmer -- device firmware update (DFU) based USB programmer for Atmel chips
Package: wnpp Owner: Andrew Straw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** * Package name: dfu-programmer Version : 0.4.0 Upstream Author : Weston Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://dfu-programmer.sourceforge.net/ * License : GPL Programming Lang: C Description : device firmware update (DFU) based USB programmer for Atmel chips A linux based command-line programmer for Atmel chips with a USB bootloader supporting in system programming. . This is a mostly Device Firmware Update (DFU) 1.0 compliant user-space application. This program was created because the Atmel FLIP program for flashing devices does not run on Linux and because standard DFU loaders do not work for Atmel chips. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 413523 to ITP: plexus-utils -- common utilities for the Plexus framework
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 > retitle 413523 ITP: plexus-utils -- common utilities for the Plexus framework Bug#413523: ITP: plexus-utils -- common utilities for the Plexus Changed Bug title to ITP: plexus-utils -- common utilities for the Plexus framework from ITP: plexus-utils -- common utilities for the Plexus. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: FoF package for Debian
2007/3/27, Sami Kyöstilä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We finally got in touch with the Teosto lawyer, and he informed us that unfortunately the game's music can't be distributed with a CC license. The problem is while the songs can freely be distributed with the game, they can't be distributed or otherwise used independently of the game without a specific license from Teosto. I wonder if we could draft a license that would fulfill this condition? Sami and friends, thank you for your persistence in these legal matter and in contacting Teosto. I will ask debian-legal. Miriam, do you agree it would be a good idea to upload: * a fretsonfire package, * and another package with two or three Debian-Free songs packaged for fretsonfire into unstable for now? Frets on Fire is a popular game (the current Windows FOF installer has been downloaded more than 230,000 times[1]) and it'd be good to get it into Debian even before this issue is resolved. :-) Cheers, Jason [1] http://sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php?group_id=182199&ugn=fretsonfire&type=prdownload&mode=alltime&package_id=211274&release_id=466327&file_id=1074215 -- Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile. I provide software development and training services to clients worldwide. Contact me for a FREE consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed. +1 (416) 781-5938 / Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed (with 1 errors): ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 414747 + ITP Unknown tag/s: ITP. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore. Bug#414747: RFP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso There were no tags set. Tags added: > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#414747: ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso
http://uvw.ru/debian/iat/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: new email
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > submitter 242736 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#242736: netkit-inetd: warning in the manual Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 263367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#263367: xml2: too old standards version Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 271988 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#271988: ITP: ded -- curses-based file browser with the possibility of editing directories Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 273741 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#273741: pcmcia-cs: wrong usage of getty Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 274049 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#274049: mozilla-firefox: stop downloading themes Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 278683 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#278683: pydf: wrong disk space Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 279092 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#279092: aircrack: package without manual page Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 279557 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#279557: mozilla-firefox: cannot use scrollwheel in preferences Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 281796 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#281796: cmatrix: -l option dont works Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 282608 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#282608: grep: false handling of escape sequences Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 283806 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#283806: ITP: elizatalk -- talk program like emacs psychatrist Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 284315 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#284315: doesnt dock in fluxbox Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 286256 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#286256: depends on mplayer Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 287995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#287995: strange cpu usage Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 290322 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#290322: no manual page Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 290344 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#290344: configuration changes? Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 295082 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#295082: strange behaviour with false config Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 300087 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#300087: not https Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 301062 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#301062: unable to uninstall Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 301294 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#301294: failed to start with init script Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 301725 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#301725: black screen after ctrl-c Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 303186 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#303186: ITP: prosilla -- multi-threaded download accelerator for ssh Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 305265 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#305265: acpi don't give rate information Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 308818 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#308818: not able to use ~ as $HOME Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > submitter 309915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#309915: segfaults when offline Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 314915 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#314915: ITP: gifshuffle -- GIF colourmap steganography program Changed Bug submitter from Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (By the way, that Bug is currently marked as done.) > submitter 315557 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug#315557: segfault Changed Bug submitter from Nico
Processed: ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 414747 ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso Bug#414747: RFP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso Changed Bug title to ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso from RFP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso. > owner 414747 Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Bug#414747: ITP: iat -- Converts many CD-ROM image formats to iso Owner recorded as Dmitry E. Oboukhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: FoF package for Debian
2007/3/27, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] Do you think the song in the tutorial classifies as song in itself? What does teosto say about that song in concrete? Oops, missed your message due while I wrote my previous messages today :-( due to buggy threading logic. Sami has said that nobody would consider the tutorial to be a song. -- Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile. I provide software development and training services to clients worldwide. Contact me for a FREE consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed. +1 (416) 781-5938 / Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging bugs that are closed by packages in NEW as pending
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # the following bugs are closed by packages in NEW > # > tags 356705 pending Bug#356705: libboost-filesystem-dev: missing boost_filesystem-mt links There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 410157 pending Bug#410157: libboost-serialization-dev: Shared libraries missing There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 415036 pending Bug#415036: ITP: arp-scan -- arp scanning and fingerprinting tool There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 415632 pending Bug#415632: ITP: openocd -- On-chip debugging, in-system programming and boundary-scan testing tool There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs
First off, thanks to all involved for working through this; legal stuff is annoying, but getting it right early makes it all worthwhile in the end. On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote: > We have a question about the default songs for the guitar-simulation > game Frets On Fire. (We would like to get the songs into main if > possible; otherwise, into contrib or non-free. But we need to satisfy > the Finnish music licensing organization Teosto. > I wonder if we could draft a license that would fulfill this > condition? There's really no point to drafting such a license, because it would not be acceptable for main, and more to the point, Teosto would have to vet it. Teosto's lawyers should really be the ones spending time and money to do so. (After all, that's what they're paid to do.) What needs to happen for the work to go in main is that Teosto needs to grant for whatever works that they own the copyright for the ability to distribute them under MIT/Expat (or similar) in addition to whatever license they'd use for uses of the work which are not in compliance with MIT/Expat. If it's decided that Teosto cannot be convinced to be slightly less antiquated in their copyright doctrine, then the alternative is to use whatever standard "game only" redistribution license Teosto uses (or will write) and then distribute them in non-free with game itself in contrib or main, depending on whether it depends upon the songs or has enough songs included to work without them. Don Armstrong [You'll notice that I didn't mention the CC; there is still some debate about its freeness, and if possible, I'd strongly suggest using a less problematic license like MIT/Expat or the GPL.] -- NASCAR is a Yankee conspiracy to keep you all placated so the South won't rise again. -- http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=327 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs
Hi all, hi Don; thanks for your input. 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [parts snipped] There's really no point to drafting such a license, because it would not be acceptable for main, and more to the point, Teosto would have to vet it. Teosto's lawyers should really be the ones spending time and money to do so. (After all, that's what they're paid to do.) Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if Teosto wrote one? For example, maybe we could write that the songs can be distributed by anyone as long as they are shipped with a computer game, and that the people who receive the songs automatically get an (irrevokable) license to redistribute the song under the same terms. What needs to happen for the work to go in main is that Teosto needs to grant for whatever works that they own the copyright for the ability to distribute them under MIT/Expat (or similar) in addition to whatever license they'd use for uses of the work which are not in compliance with MIT/Expat. I doubt Teosto will do that. Cheers, Jason P.S. I am CC'ing [EMAIL PROTECTED] now even though I didn't CC it before. -- Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile. I provide software development and training services to clients worldwide. Contact me for a FREE consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed. +1 (416) 781-5938 / Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote: > Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a > license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could > get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if > Teosto wrote one? The following is what I would use if I were to license my own compositions[1] for distribution in Debian: Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this work (the "Work"), to deal in the Work without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Work, and to permit persons to whom the Work is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Work. THE WORK IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE WORK. Don Armstrong 1: If you're feeling generous enough to call them that... -- "For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, none is possible." http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs
2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote: > Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a > license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could > get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if > Teosto wrote one? The following is what I would use if I were to license my own compositions[1] for distribution in Debian: I'm sure you realize Teosto would consider the BSD license far too liberal, and forbid it. :-) Seriously, do you think my idea of writing a license has merit? -- Jason Spiro: computer consulting with a smile. I provide software development and training services to clients worldwide. Contact me for a FREE consultation. Satisfaction guaranteed. +1 (416) 781-5938 / Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] / MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote: > 2007/3/27, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Jason Spiro wrote: > >> Maybe if debian-legal or I wrote the license (I have never written a > >> license before, but maybe I could modify the MIT license) we could > >> get Teosto to agree on more liberal terms than we would get if > >> Teosto wrote one? > > > >The following is what I would use if I were to license my own > >compositions[1] for distribution in Debian: > > > I'm sure you realize Teosto would consider the BSD license far too > liberal, and forbid it. Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining how their own works are licensed, so I'm trying to give them the benifit of the doubt here. > Seriously, do you think my idea of writing a license has merit? No, because it wouldn't be acceptable for main, and they'd have to review it anyway. [That said, it's your time, so do whatever you think is best.] Don Armstrong -- If I had a letter, sealed it in a locked vault and hid the vault somewhere in New York. Then told you to read the letter, thats not security, thats obscurity. If I made a letter, sealed it in a vault, gave you the blueprints of the vault, the combinations of 1000 other vaults, access to the best lock smiths in the world, then told you to read the letter, and you still can't, thats security. -- Bruce Schneier http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383316: Choosing a license for Frets on Fire songs
On 3/28/07, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well, it actually seems rather strange to me for an organization which is designed to "protect" artists disallowing artists from determining how their own works are licensed, so I'm trying to give them the benifit of the doubt here. Do they really? That would mean that all the copyright holders would have given them exclusive licensing rights. I haven't read the full bug log, but has anyone contacted the composers directly? -- Andrew Donnellan ajdlinuxATgmailDOTcom (primary)ajdlinuxATexemailDOTcomDOTau (secure) http://andrewdonnellan.com http://ajdlinux.wordpress.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] hkp://subkeys.pgp.net 0x5D4C0C58 http://linux.org.auhttp://debian.org Get free rewards - http://ezyrewards.com/?id=23484 Spammers only === [EMAIL PROTECTED] === -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
