Re: Technical committee resolution
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson) writes: > Obviously that means those people have rather less time on their > hands. I think this is the main cause of the TC's current > largely-wedged state I don't personally think that the TC suffers primarily from members having limited time to devote. I think the core problem is a fairly loosely defined process for decision making that leaves us open to being schizophrenic about timing, and with a demonstrated inability to discern when we're reaching concensus and what to do when we aren't. Adding more people isn't likely to fix that. > and I think it could be solved by widening the > circle of people so that less is demanded from each one. A larger committee might be a good thing for lots of reasons, but I'm not convinced it will help the problem I think you're trying to address as much as this implies. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Technical committee resolution
* Bdale Garbee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080418 19:18]: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson) writes: > > > Obviously that means those people have rather less time on their > > hands. I think this is the main cause of the TC's current > > largely-wedged state > > I don't personally think that the TC suffers primarily from members > having limited time to devote. I think the core problem is a fairly > loosely defined process for decision making that leaves us open to > being schizophrenic about timing, and with a demonstrated inability > to discern when we're reaching concensus and what to do when we > aren't. Adding more people isn't likely to fix that. Agreed. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Technical committee resolution
Hi, I guess the idea is that (a) new member(s) will "bring along"/"make happen" the structures & procedures which seem to be missing... Which is not totally far out - at least if this is communicated to the new member(s) ;-) More people alone won't change anything. But wasn't that clear from the beginning? regards, Holger pgp6s0I1D6AuI.pgp Description: PGP signature
