[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ian Jackson) writes: > Obviously that means those people have rather less time on their > hands. I think this is the main cause of the TC's current > largely-wedged state
I don't personally think that the TC suffers primarily from members having limited time to devote. I think the core problem is a fairly loosely defined process for decision making that leaves us open to being schizophrenic about timing, and with a demonstrated inability to discern when we're reaching concensus and what to do when we aren't. Adding more people isn't likely to fix that. > and I think it could be solved by widening the > circle of people so that less is demanded from each one. A larger committee might be a good thing for lots of reasons, but I'm not convinced it will help the problem I think you're trying to address as much as this implies. Bdale -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
