Bug#815728: jessie-pu: package debmirror/1:2.16+deb8u1

[Colin Watson]

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 05:41:12AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Jonathan Wiltshire  (2016-11-20):
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 07:32:30AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > As the new debmirror maintainer, I'd like to fix a couple of problems
> > > with the version in stable.  One is serious and causes debmirror to sit
> > > in an infinite loop when run against the current Debian archive
> > > (#808216, #815149).  While the other doesn't have quite such dire
> > > consequences, a current desktop system with the appstream package
> > > installed needs to have the DEP-11 metadata files present in order for
> > > "apt update" to succeed (#814416).
> > 
> > Is this still desired or should the bug be closed?
> 
> Ping?

Hmm, wow, I left this one for a while, didn't I?  In the meantime I've
accumulated some more fixes in my jessie branch that are needed to do a
more reasonable job of mirroring current repositories.  Can I get an
updated approval for this patch?

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 98a5953..e840339 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
+debmirror (1:2.16+deb8u1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Tolerate unknown lines in *.diff/Index (closes: #808216, #815149).
+  * Mirror DEP-11 metadata files (closes: #814416).
+  * Prefer xz over gz, and cope with either being missing as long as we can
+get some version of the index file in question.
+  * Use check_lists to check Translation files rather than a similar custom
+function; this allows use of stronger hashes.
+  * Mirror and validate InRelease files (closes: #619188).
+
+ -- Colin Watson   Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:26:17 +
+
 debmirror (1:2.16) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Fix confusing output with --precleanup.
diff --git a/debmirror b/debmirror
index 0c2543c..88768a5 100755
--- a/debmirror
+++ b/debmirror
@@ -671,6 +671,10 @@ my %file_lists;
 # info. Files also get registered in %files.
 my %i18n_get;
 
+# Hash to record which DEP-11 metadata files need to be downloaded. Files
+# also get registered in %files.
+my %dep11_get;
+
 # Separate hash for files belonging to Debian Installer images.
 # This data is not cached.
 my %di_files;
@@ -967,8 +971,18 @@ foreach my $dist (@dists) {
   $files{"dists/$codename$dist_sdir/Release.gpg"}=1;
   $files{$tempdir."/"."dists/$codename$dist_sdir/Release.gpg"}=1;
   if ($debmarshal) {
-   link_release_into_snapshot($mirrordir,$dist,$next,$tempdir,
-  $codename,$dist_sdir);
+link_release_into_snapshot($mirrordir,$dist,$next,$tempdir,
+   $codename,$dist_sdir,"Release.gpg");
+  }
+}
+if (-f "$tdir/InRelease") {
+  rename("$tdir/InRelease", "$tempdir/dists/$codename$dist_sdir/InRelease")
+or die "Error while moving $tdir/InRelease: $!\n";
+  $files{"dists/$codename$dist_sdir/InRelease"}=1;
+  $files{$tempdir."/"."dists/$codename$dist_sdir/InRelease"}=1;
+  if ($debmarshal) {
+link_release_into_snapshot($mirrordir,$dist,$next,$tempdir,
+   $codename,$dist_sdir,"InRelease");
   }
 }
   }
@@ -1004,7 +1018,7 @@ if ($num_errors != 0 && $ignore_missing_release) {
 
 if ($num_errors != 0) {
   print "Errors:\n ".join(" ",@errlog) if (@errlog);
-  die "Failed to download some Release or Release.gpg files!\n";
+  die "Failed to download some Release, Release.gpg or InRelease files!\n";
 }
 
 # Enable caching again for http
@@ -1092,7 +1106,7 @@ if ($num_errors != 0) {
 # for the ftp method.
 $do_dry_run = $dry_run;
 
-# Determine size of Contents and Translation files to get.
+# Determine size of Contents, Translation, and DEP-11 files to get.
 if ($getcontents) {
   # Updates of Contents files using diffs are done here; only full downloads
   # are delayed.
@@ -1126,6 +1140,7 @@ foreach my $dist (keys %distset) {
   next unless exists $distset{$dist}{mirror};
   foreach my $section (@sections) {
 i18n_from_release($dist,"$section/i18n");
+dep11_from_release($dist,"$section/dep11");
   }
 }
 
@@ -1296,16 +1311,17 @@ SOURCE:
   }
 }
 
-# With pre-mirror cleanup Contents and Translation files need to be
+# With pre-mirror cleanup Contents, Translation, and DEP-11 files need to be
 # downloaded before the cleanup as otherwise they would be deleted
 # because they haven't been registered yet.
 # With post-mirror cleanup it's more neat to do all downloads together.
 # This could be simplified if we could register the files earlier.
 
-# Download Contents and Translation files.
+# Download Contents, Translation, and DEP-11 files.
 init_connection();
 get_contents_files() if ($getcontents);
 get_i18n_files();
+get_dep11_files();
 
 # Pre-mirror cleanup
 if ($pre_cleanup) {
@@ -1626,21 +1642,6 @@ sub check_file {
   return 0;
 }
 
-# Always checks both file size and sha1 as the files get updated (this is
-# similar to what is done in check_lists, which forces verify_checksums).
-sub check_i18n {

Bug#882061: jessie-pu: package openssh/1:6.7p1-5+deb8u4

[Colin Watson]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 07:15:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 11:14 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > This is the jessie version of #865986.  The WinSCP change isn't
> > applicable to jessie, but the fixes for #865770 and #873201 are.
> 
> I've assumed that KiBi will be happy with this, given his handling of
> #865986, but CCing for completeness.
> 
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded, thanks.

-- 
Colin Watson   [cjwat...@debian.org]

Bug#881415: stretch-pu: python2.7/2.7.13-2+deb9u1

[Kurt Roeckx]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 06:28:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sat, 2017-11-11 at 14:36 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > I would like to upload python2.7 to fix a problem that it can't
> > talk to SSL/TLS sites that use an ECDSA certificate different than
> > P256, like a P384 certificate.
> > 
> 
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded.


Kurt

Bug#880630: jessie-pu: package liblouis/2.5.3-3

[Samuel Thibault]

Hello,

Adam D. Barratt, on sam. 18 nov. 2017 19:11:39 +, wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 01:54 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Bug#880621 reports that Jessie is affected by CVE-2014-8184.  I'm
> > proposing to upload there the RedHat fix plus a fix for that fix (it
> > didn't actually take care of issues in the strncpy call). Debdiff is
> > attached.
> 
> Please go ahead.

This is now uploaded.

Thanks,
Samuel

Bug#881900: stretch-pu: package libofx/1:0.9.10-2+deb9u1

[Dylan Aïssi]

Hi Adam,

2017-11-18 19:31 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt :
>
> Please go ahead.
>
> Adam

Thanks, uploaded.

Best,
Dylan

Bug#882132: jessie-pu: package libofx/1:0.9.10-1+deb8u1

[Dylan Aïssi]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Dear release team,
Upstream has fixed 2 CVE (CVE-2017-2816 and CVE-2017-14731), these 2
CVE are non-dsa. I already backported patches to
unstable/testing/stretch (#881900) and now I would like to fix the
Jessie version. Please find attached a debdiff.

Best,
Dylan


libofx_0.9.10-1+deb8u1.debdiff
Description: Binary data

Bug#875714: stretch-pu: package zeroc-ice/3.6.3-5

[Julien Cristau]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 13:40:04 +0100, Jose Gutierrez de la Concha wrote:

> Should I close this bug now and open a new one after upload 3.6.4-2?
> 
Reusing this one should be fine, remove the moreinfo tag when you send
in a new diff.

Cheers,
Julien

Bug#873877: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u3

[Markus Wanner]

On 11/18/2017 07:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 21:55 +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
>> here's an update for jessie, fixing #873439 (CVE-2017-13709). It's
>> based on a patch and debdiff by Florent Rougon. The corresponding
>> stretch-pu request is #873754.
>>
> 
> Please go ahead; sorry for not getting back to you sooner.

No problem.

I updated the timestamp and also added a "Closes: #873439" to the
changelog. I hope that change is still acceptable.

The upload has been accepted into oldstable-proposed-updates.

Kind Regards

Markus Wanner

Processed: severity of 881127 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> severity 881127 important
Bug #881127 [release.debian.org] transition: xerces-c
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
881127: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881127
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: block 881127 with 881920

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 881127 with 881920
Bug #881127 [release.debian.org] transition: xerces-c
881127 was blocked by: 881018 881016 881108 881115 881114 881112 881023 881026
881127 was blocking: 873669
Added blocking bug(s) of 881127: 881920
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
881127: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881127
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Processed: severity of 881127 is important

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> severity -1 normal
Bug #881127 [release.debian.org] transition: xerces-c
Severity set to 'normal' from 'important'

-- 
881127: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881127
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#881127: Processed: severity of 881127 is important

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: severity -1 normal

On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 14:39 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> 
> > severity 881127 important
> 
> Bug #881127 [release.debian.org] transition: xerces-c
> Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
> > 

Nope. Bugs against release.debian.org are "normal" severity at most.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#878816: stretch-pu: package lttng-modules/2.9.0-1+deb9u1

[Julien Cristau]

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:31:39 -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:

> So, I'll tag bug #864404 as stretch and add the fix to my next unstable
> upload without a close statement.
> 
Both of those sound like the wrong thing to do.

Cheers,
Julien

Re: Bug#880393: libsasl2-modules-gssapi-heimdal seems built against MIT

[Julien Cristau]

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:07:11 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:

> Hi Johan,
> 
> you are the first one to notice :).
> 
> There was a time shortly before stable freeze when Heimdal team
> requested removal of heimdal from Debian (#837724), but instead this
> activity woke up the upstream, so they released new upstream version
> (#849706). Somewhere in between something went awry and the full Heimdal
> support wasn't properly reinstated into cyrus-sasl2.
> 
> I am not sure whether this could be fixed in Debian stable as things
> might break with sudden change. Ccing debian-release for advice.
> 
Sorry, it's not clear to me what you're asking of debian-release, please
provide full context and clear questions.

Cheers,
Julien

Upcoming stable point release

[Adam D. Barratt]

Hi,

The next point release for "stretch" (9.3) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 9th. Processing of new uploads into stretch-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.

Regards,

Adam

Upcoming oldstable point release

[Adam D. Barratt]

Hi,

The next point release for "jessie" (8.10) is scheduled for Saturday,
December 9th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates
will be frozen during the preceding weekend.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#882068: stretch-pu: dehydrated/0.3.1-3+deb9u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #882068 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: dehydrated/0.3.1-3+deb9u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.

-- 
882068: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882068
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#882068: stretch-pu: dehydrated/0.3.1-3+deb9u1

[Julien Cristau]

Control: tag -1 confirmed

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 14:16:23 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:

> I'd like to fix https://bugs.debian.org/881974 (dehydrated using the old
> license agreement URL by default) in stretch.
> The issue does not concern buster, as in that version dehydrated is able
> to retrieve the correct URL dinamically.
> 
> See attached a patch for the stretch version, also built and tested on
> stretch.
> 
OK for upload to stretch.

Cheers,
Julien

Bug#882051: nmu: debhelper 10.10.7 dbgsym regression fix: rebuild xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3, xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3

[Julien Cristau]

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 17:51:09 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:

> Control: retitle -1 debhelper 10.10.7 dbgsym regression fix rebuilds
> 
> On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 14:17 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> 
> > There are probably several packages affected but I am not aware of
> > any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> > debhelper 10.10.6
> 
> It was pointed out on IRC that buildinfo files can be used for this.
> Unfortunately our tools don't make it easy to query that info, but I
> came up with this list of packages that look like they need binNMUs:
> 
> nmu bbmail_0.9.3-2+b1 mips64el . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym 
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix"
[...]

Above syntax is wrong, you're missing a . between package and
architectures, and version should be source version.  Also if any of
those packages build multi-arch: same binaries, this would break them.
Overall it doesn't sound like anything's actually broken, so I'd err on
the side of not doing anything, and they'll get new dbgsyms on the next
source upload.

Cheers,
Julien

Bug#873384: Supporting stable-proposed-update

[Geert Stappers]

Hi,

This e-mail is for expressing my support
of stable-proposed-update for calendar-exchange-provider

The goal, the wish, is to have calendar-exchange-provider
working again in Stretch. It got broken due update
to Mozilla Thunderbird 52 in Stretch.

Calendar-exchange-provider upstream did follow the Mozilla
change and has it fix in new release named v4.0.0-beta
 ( https://github.com/ExchangeCalendar/exchangecalendar/releases )

There is 4.0.0~beta4-1 available for Buster and unstable.

I agree that 'beta' in the version is somewhat akward.
It is how upstream named their release ( in Juli )


In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873384#15
there is
 } 2) please provide a diff for a proposed stable update,
 }not for the sid package.

Would that be the regular debian diff?

As I it isn't clear to me what "diff" is requested.


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Leven en laten leven

Bug#878816: stretch-pu: package lttng-modules/2.9.0-1+deb9u1

[Michael Jeanson]

On 19/11/17 09:50, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:31:39 -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:
> 
>> So, I'll tag bug #864404 as stretch and add the fix to my next unstable
>> upload without a close statement.
>>
> Both of those sound like the wrong thing to do.

Fair enough, but I'm more interested by what would be the right thing to do?

Bug#882051: nmu: debhelper 10.10.7 dbgsym regression fix: rebuild xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3, xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3

[Paul Wise]

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:10 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:

> Above syntax is wrong, you're missing a . between package and
> architectures, and version should be source version.  Also if any of
> those packages build multi-arch: same binaries, this would break them.
> Overall it doesn't sound like anything's actually broken, so I'd err on
> the side of not doing anything, and they'll get new dbgsyms on the next
> source upload.

Sorry about the syntax issue.

Adrian Bunk confirmed on IRC the multi-arch issue is not applicable here.

This bug is preventing me from upgrading xdg-desktop-portal and
xdg-desktop-portal-gtk on my laptop, so it would be nice if they could
be binNMUed in maybe a month for the packages that have not yet had
updates.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882147: transition: openturns

[D. Barbier]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

I would like to upload openturns 1.9 from experimental into unstable.  This
package will also fix #881706.
There are no reverse dependencies except science metapackages.

Denis

Ben file:

title = "openturns";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenturns0.8" | .depends ~ "libopenturns0.10";
is_good = .depends ~ "libopenturns0.10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libopenturns0.8";

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..jndu

[Kimberly Thompson]

Hello, what is this? Kimberly Thompson, kathompson4...@gmail.com

On Nov 19, 2017 11:45 AM, "final notice"  wrote:

important information






















































































Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
(10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
"Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..JQMh

[Debbie Forrest]

Hi I'm here

On Nov 19, 2017 11:45 AM, "final notice"  wrote:

> important information
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..QVrMZV

[Michel Angel]

I won the 50 dollards why am i getting a final notice. Do you want me to 
returned the 50 dollars. I have a credit card. Do you want the numbers

> On Nov 18, 2017, at 1:17 AM, final notice  wrote:
> 
> important information
> 
> 
> 
>
> 
>   
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: 
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7 
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from 
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not 
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against 
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two packages 
> I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper (10.10.7) 
> unstable; urgency=3Dmedium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused debug 
> symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into debug 
> packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips 
> powerpc ppc64= el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages 
> after debhelpe= r 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 . amd64 arm64 
> i386 mips64el mips powerpc p= pc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to 
> include dbgsym packages after debh= elper 10.10.7 fix" --=20 bye, pabs 
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..Rtyj

[Randall Davidson]

Leave me alone


On Nov 19, 2017 8:45 AM, "final notice"  wrote:

> important information
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Info received (Welcome To Amazon..jndu)

[Kimberly Thompson]

I didn't send any messages

On Nov 19, 2017 11:51 AM, "Debian Bug Tracking System" <
ow...@bugs.debian.org> wrote:

> Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
> this Bug report.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>  Debian Release Team 
>
> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 882...@bugs.debian.org.
>
> Please do not send mail to ow...@bugs.debian.org unless you wish
> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>
> --
> 882051: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882051
> Debian Bug Tracking System
> Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
>

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..UAMnKB

[Ronnie Kernaghan]

Please stop sending me these shite emails .

On 19 Nov 2017 4:45 pm, "final notice"  wrote:

> important information
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..DAJ0p3

[Ronnie Kernaghan]

Please stop sending me these  shirt emails.Thanks

On 19 Nov 2017 4:45 pm, "final notice"  wrote:

> important information
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..mNQb

[Arthur Flavin]

Quit sending me this bullshit, fuck off and go dig yourself a shallow grave you 
fake fucks

> On Nov 18, 2017, at 1:17 AM, final notice  wrote:
> 
> important information
> 
> 
> 
>
> 
>   
> 
>   
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: 
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7 
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from 
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not 
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against 
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two packages 
> I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper (10.10.7) 
> unstable; urgency=3Dmedium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused debug 
> symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into debug 
> packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips 
> powerpc ppc64= el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages 
> after debhelpe= r 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 . amd64 arm64 
> i386 mips64el mips powerpc p= pc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to 
> include dbgsym packages after debh= elper 10.10.7 fix" --=20 bye, pabs 
> https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..LdAqAz

[Tony Qudsi]

 شكرا.

On Nov 19, 2017 8:45 AM, "final notice"  wrote:

> important information
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..hmud

[Tony Qudsi]

Danke.

On Nov 19, 2017 8:45 AM, "final notice"  wrote:

> important information
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Bug#882051: Welcome To Amazon..8FBEfu

[Renee Howard]

Don't need a job

On Nov 19, 2017 11:45 AM, "final notice"  wrote:

> important information
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
> release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7
> fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from
> being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not
> aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against
> debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two
> packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper
> (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused
> debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into
> debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el
> mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym
> packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 .
> amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m
> "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye,
> pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Processed: your mail

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> block 869752 by 882157
Bug #869752 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to llvm 4.0
869752 was not blocked by any bugs.
869752 was blocking: 869602
Added blocking bug(s) of 869752: 882157
> block 869752 by 853715
Bug #869752 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to llvm 4.0
869752 was blocked by: 882157
869752 was blocking: 869602
Added blocking bug(s) of 869752: 853715
> block 869752 by 880257
Bug #869752 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to llvm 4.0
869752 was blocked by: 882157 853715
869752 was blocking: 869602
Added blocking bug(s) of 869752: 880257 and 879976
> block 869752 by 882160
Bug #869752 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to llvm 4.0
869752 was blocked by: 853715 880257 882157 879976
869752 was blocking: 869602
Added blocking bug(s) of 869752: 882160
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
869752: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=869752
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#882147: marked as done (transition: openturns)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Sun, 19 Nov 2017 20:34:43 +0100
with message-id 
and subject line Re: Bug#882147: transition: openturns
has caused the Debian Bug report #882147,
regarding transition: openturns
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
882147: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882147
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

I would like to upload openturns 1.9 from experimental into unstable.  This
package will also fix #881706.
There are no reverse dependencies except science metapackages.

Denis

Ben file:

title = "openturns";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenturns0.8" | .depends ~ "libopenturns0.10";
is_good = .depends ~ "libopenturns0.10";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libopenturns0.8";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 19/11/17 17:20, D. Barbier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I would like to upload openturns 1.9 from experimental into unstable.  This
> package will also fix #881706.
> There are no reverse dependencies except science metapackages.

There are no rdeps for the shared library, so no binNMUs should be needed. I'm
closing this, please go ahead and let us know if you hit any problems.

Emilio--- End Message ---

Bug#881127: transition: xerces-c

[Ferenc Wágner]

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:08:28 + Bill Blough  wrote:

> The package has been uploaded to unstable [...]

Dear Release Team,

xmltooling, opensaml2 and shibboleth-sp2 must be rebuilt again in this
order to correctly pick up the new xerces library.

Meanwhile I'd like to upload their latest upstream releases, which fix
serious security issues in the latter two (#881856 and #881857).  Shall
I wait for this transition to complete before the uploads?
-- 
Thanks,
Feri

Bug#881127: transition: xerces-c

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 19/11/17 22:04, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 20:08:28 + Bill Blough  wrote:
> 
>> The package has been uploaded to unstable [...]
> 
> Dear Release Team,
> 
> xmltooling, opensaml2 and shibboleth-sp2 must be rebuilt again in this
> order to correctly pick up the new xerces library.
> 
> Meanwhile I'd like to upload their latest upstream releases, which fix
> serious security issues in the latter two (#881856 and #881857).  Shall
> I wait for this transition to complete before the uploads?

No need to wait in this case. Please go ahead.

Emilio

Bug#877195: the patches

[Russell Coker]

I sent such a debdiff almost 2 months ago. Is it ok?

On 30 September 2017 1:39:15 am AEST, "Adam D. Barratt" 
 wrote:
>On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 01:08 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
>> I've attached the patches.  These all come from the package currently
>> in 
>> Testing.
>> 
>Thanks, but we don't review individual patches (at least, we don't
>ack/nack uploads based on looking at individual patches).
>
>If you'd like an ack for an upload to stable, we'd need to see a full
>source debdiff for a package that's been built and tested on stable.
>
>Regards,
>
>Adam

-- 
Sent from my Huawei Mate 9 with K-9 Mail.

Bug#877195: the patches

[Adam D. Barratt]

[apparently this ended up sat in my drafts for a while]

On Sun, 2017-10-01 at 23:49 +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday, 29 September 2017 4:39:15 PM AEDT Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 01:08 +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > I've attached the patches.  These all come from the package
> > > currently
> > > in 
> > > Testing.
> > 
> > Thanks, but we don't review individual patches (at least, we don't
> > ack/nack uploads based on looking at individual patches).
> 
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html
> 
> Section 5.5.1 of the above seemed to indicate that I should do it
> that way.  
> Did I misunderstand it or does the documentation need improving?

Some combination. :-)

You used reportbug to file the report - did it not ask for a debdiff?

> > If you'd like an ack for an upload to stable, we'd need to see a
> > full
> > source debdiff for a package that's been built and tested on
> > stable.
> 
> I've attached such a debdiff.  NB It has one thing that is not
> required (but 
> is still handy) that is a build-conflicts against too-new versions of
> the SE 
> Linux tools.  This prevents anyone from accidentally building it on
> Testing or 
> Unstable (which will be unusable).  Obviously the package will work
> OK without 
> such a build-conflict, unless you build it with the wrong packages
> installed.

Technically, it's version-constrained build-dependencies, rather than a
build-conflict.

In any case, the diff you supplied has:

+refpolicy (2:2.20161023.1-10) unstable; urgency=medium

which obviously isn't what you're proposing using for an upload to
stable. I realise I said "a package", but the implication was that it
be a package that you could simply upload "as-is" if the diff was OKed.

Regards,

Adam

Re: Bug#882099: libnih1: Dependency from libc6<2.25 breaks dist-upgrade

[Axel Beckert]

Hi again,

Axel Beckert wrote:
> Indeed. It still depends on libc6 < 2.25 despite being rebuilt against
> libc6 2.25 according to
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libnih

Nope, the rebuilt against libc6 2.25 went wrong and was still against
version 2.24, at least on amd64:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libnih&arch=amd64&ver=1.0.3-8%2Bb1&stamp=155842&raw=0

And a local rebuilt in pbuilder (as of Git HEAD in the packaging repo)
worked fine and shows the proper dependencies.

So for now, it just seems necessary to fix the binary rebuild
(BinNMU).

And since the release team is tracking this at
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.25.html anyway, I
expect them to notice that, too, very soon, or already have.
Nevertheless, Cc'ing them to make sure they're aware of this bug
report. As far as I can see, this bug can be closed when the fixed
rebuild on amd64 hits unstable.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Re: Bug#882099: libnih1: Dependency from libc6<2.25 breaks dist-upgrade

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort]

On 19/11/17 22:57, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> Axel Beckert wrote:
>> Indeed. It still depends on libc6 < 2.25 despite being rebuilt against
>> libc6 2.25 according to
>> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libnih
> 
> Nope, the rebuilt against libc6 2.25 went wrong and was still against
> version 2.24, at least on amd64:
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libnih&arch=amd64&ver=1.0.3-8%2Bb1&stamp=155842&raw=0
> 
> And a local rebuilt in pbuilder (as of Git HEAD in the packaging repo)
> worked fine and shows the proper dependencies.
> 
> So for now, it just seems necessary to fix the binary rebuild
> (BinNMU).
> 
> And since the release team is tracking this at
> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.25.html anyway, I
> expect them to notice that, too, very soon, or already have.
> Nevertheless, Cc'ing them to make sure they're aware of this bug
> report. As far as I can see, this bug can be closed when the fixed
> rebuild on amd64 hits unstable.

Yep, my bad. I (again) forgot to add --extra-depends to the binNMUs, as libc is
installed on the chroots and they don't get updated for each build. I'll fix
this, either by adding --extra-depends on libc-bin (as there are too many
different libc SONAMEs) or by waiting a few hours as the chroots will be updated
soon.

Cheers,
Emilio

Bug#877503: stretch-pu: package mongodb/1:3.2.11-2

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 17:51 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 12:33 +0300, Apollon Oikonomopoulos wrote:
> >  - #876755: GCC 6 and later optimizes out some null pointer checks.
> > It 
> >    appears that this breaks the bundled version of spidermonkey
> > (38)
> > and 
> >    causes null pointer dereferences. This is fixed by disabling
> > the 
> >    relevant GCC optimizations for the spidermonkey build.
> > 
> >  - #871906: Since Stretch, our kernels have enabled 48-bit virtual 
> >    addressing on aarch64. MongoDB's embedded spidermonkey crashes
> > on 
> >    kernels with 48-bit VA support, as it assumes that all pointers
> > have 
> >    17 bits clear that can be used for tagging. This is fixed by 
> >    cherry-picking a patch from Mozilla upstream that uses manual 
> >    malloc(3) hints to make sure the malloc()'d regions comply with
> > this 
> >    requirement.
> > 
> >  - #864407: mongodb.service lacks an `After=network.target'
> > statement, 
> >    so startup will fail on system boot if mongodb is asked to bind
> > to
> > a 
> >    non-wildcard, non-localhost address.
> > 
> 
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#879850: stretch-pu: package sqldeveloper-package/0.2.4+deb9u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 17:56 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 14:40 +0100, Phil Morrell wrote:
> > I have prepared a re-upload of 0.2.4+nmu1 (upload done: 879070)
> > targeting stretch to fix RC bug #868673 which makes this packaging
> > wrapper unusable in stretch.
> 
> Please go ahead.
> 
> Regards,

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#877503: stretch-pu: package mongodb/1:3.2.11-2

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #877503 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package mongodb/1:3.2.11-2
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
877503: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877503
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#878668: stretch-pu: package simutrans/120.1.3+repack-3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #878668 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package simutrans/120.1.3+repack-3
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
878668: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=878668
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#879599: stretch-pu: package charmtimetracker/1.11.4-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #879599 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package charmtimetracker/1.11.4-1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
879599: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879599
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#881415: stretch-pu: python2.7/2.7.13-2+deb9u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 13:31 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 06:28:03PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > 
> > On Sat, 2017-11-11 at 14:36 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > I would like to upload python2.7 to fix a problem that it can't
> > > talk to SSL/TLS sites that use an ECDSA certificate different
> > > than
> > > P256, like a P384 certificate.
> > > 
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Uploaded.

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#879599: stretch-pu: package charmtimetracker/1.11.4-1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 17:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sun, 2017-11-05 at 15:35 +0100, Sandro Knauß wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> > > 
> > > You also introduced a new issue in the short description:
> > > 
> > > -Description: Cross-Platform Time Tracker
> > > +Description: a task based Time Tracker
> > > 
> > > The convention is that the description can finish the sentence
> > > "$package (is a|contains)".
> > 
> >  
> > > I note that #873917 isn't fixed in unstable currently. I realise
> > > it's a
> > > trivial change, but we should still ensure that such things are
> > > fixed
> > > in unstable, so as not to regress between releases.
> > 
> > Well because  #873917 is quite trivial i don't want to push a new
> > version with 
> > only this patch to unstable. I have nothing more to fix for
> > charmtimetracker 
> > at my list at the moment for unstable.
> 
> [...]
> > Should I rework the description for unstable and pu? And/or remove
> > it
> > from the 
> > pu? If you want me first to upload the fix to unstable, I'll do
> > this.
> > 
> 
> Feel free to upload, but the fix should land in unstable asap.

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#879850: stretch-pu: package sqldeveloper-package/0.2.4+deb9u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #879850 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package 
sqldeveloper-package/0.2.4+deb9u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
879850: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879850
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#878668: stretch-pu: package simutrans/120.1.3+repack-3

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 21:45 +0100, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 18.11.2017 um 18:52 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > 
> > On Sun, 2017-10-15 at 17:30 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> > > I would like to fix Debian bug #869029 [1] in Stretch. It is
> > > currently
> > > not possible to enable sound for simutrans which was not
> > > intended.
> > > 
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Adam
> 
> Uploaded. Thank you!

Flagged for acceptance into p-u.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#881415: stretch-pu: python2.7/2.7.13-2+deb9u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #881415 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: python2.7/2.7.13-2+deb9u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
881415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#881900: stretch-pu: package libofx/1:0.9.10-2+deb9u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 14:53 +0100, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> 
> 2017-11-18 19:31 GMT+01:00 Adam D. Barratt 
> :
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> > 
> > Adam
> 
> Thanks, uploaded.

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#881900: stretch-pu: package libofx/1:0.9.10-2+deb9u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #881900 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package libofx/1:0.9.10-2+deb9u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
881900: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881900
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#877420: stretch-pu: xml2/0.4-3.1+deb9u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 17:48 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 00:01 +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> > +xml2 (0.4-3.1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
> > +
> > +  * QA upload.
> > +  * Set maintainer to Debian QA Group.
> 
> Those are both generally irrelevant and unnecessary for updates in
> stable.

Specifically, no tooling looks at the content of the maintainer field
other than for packages in unstable/experimental, and many uploads to
stable are not made by the usual maintainer of the package.

> > +  * Backport patch to fix corruption when dealing with UTF-8
> > files.
> > +(Closes: #506805; Closes: #698072)
> > +  * Backport patch to fix usage string for 2csv tool.
> > +(Closes: #506788)
> 
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#877420: stretch-pu: xml2/0.4-3.1+deb9u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #877420 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: xml2/0.4-3.1+deb9u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
877420: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877420
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#852952: jessie-pu: package libxrandr/2:1.4.2-1+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 18:37 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 13:49 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> > 
> > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 15:10:24 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > 
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > Tags: jessie
> > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: pu
> > > 
> > 
> > New patch, now with less memory leak.  I've also attached the diff
> > from
> > the previous one.
> > 
> 
> Please go ahead.

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#876019: jessie-pu: package libwpd/0.10.0-2+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #876019 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libwpd/0.10.0-2+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
876019: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876019
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#852952: jessie-pu: package libxrandr/2:1.4.2-1+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #852952 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libxrandr/2:1.4.2-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
852952: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=852952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#876019: jessie-pu: package libwpd/0.10.0-2+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 22:25 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 06:57:20PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-09-17 at 15:19 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > See http://bugs.debian.org/876001. CVE classified as no-dsa
> > > (minor
> > > issue).
> > > 
> > 
> > Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
> 
> uploaded.
> 

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#873877: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u3

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 15:11 +0100, Markus Wanner wrote:
> On 11/18/2017 07:53 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > 
> > On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 21:55 +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
> > > here's an update for jessie, fixing #873439 (CVE-2017-13709).
> > > It's
> > > based on a patch and debdiff by Florent Rougon. The corresponding
> > > stretch-pu request is #873754.
> > > 
> > 
> > Please go ahead; sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
> 
> No problem.
> 
> I updated the timestamp and also added a "Closes: #873439" to the
> changelog. I hope that change is still acceptable.
> 
> The upload has been accepted into oldstable-proposed-updates.

Technically it had only been accepted into oldstable-new. I've just
flagged it for acceptance into opu.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#880630: jessie-pu: package liblouis/2.5.3-3

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 14:29 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Adam D. Barratt, on sam. 18 nov. 2017 19:11:39 +, wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > 
> > On Fri, 2017-11-03 at 01:54 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Bug#880621 reports that Jessie is affected by CVE-2014-8184.  I'm
> > > proposing to upload there the RedHat fix plus a fix for that fix
> > > (it
> > > didn't actually take care of issues in the strncpy call). Debdiff
> > > is
> > > attached.
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> This is now uploaded.

Flagged for acceptance into opu.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#876630: jessie-pu: package db5.3/5.3.28-9+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 21:09 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> 
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 06:58:28PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > 
> > On Sun, 2017-09-24 at 10:08 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > db5.3 (5.3.28-9+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
> > > > 
> > > >  * Non-maintainer upload.
> > > >  * CVE-2017-10140: Reads DB_CONFIG from the current working
> > > > directory.
> > > >    Do not access DB_CONFIG when db_home is not set. (Closes:
> > > > #872436)
> > > > 
> > 
> > Please go ahead; sorry for the delay.
> 
> Absolutely no problem, uploaded!
> 

Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#873877: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #873877 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u3
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
873877: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=873877
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#876638: jessie-pu: package db/5.1.29-9+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 21:11 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 06:59:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > 
> > On Sun, 2017-09-24 at 11:29 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > db (5.1.29-9+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
> > > > 
> > > >  * Non-maintainer upload.
> > > >  * CVE-2017-10140: Reads DB_CONFIG from the current working
> > > > directory.
> > > >    Do not access DB_CONFIG when db_home is not set.
> > > > 
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Uploaded!
> 

Flagged for acceptance; thanks.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#880630: jessie-pu: package liblouis/2.5.3-3

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #880630 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package liblouis/2.5.3-3
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
880630: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880630
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#880123: jessie-pu: package syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #880123 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package 
syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
880123: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880123
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#881306: jessie-pu: package python-tablib/0.9.11-2 CVE-2017-2810

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #881306 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package python-tablib/0.9.11-2 
CVE-2017-2810
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
881306: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881306
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#881306: jessie-pu: package python-tablib/0.9.11-2 CVE-2017-2810

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 19:13 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 00:02 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > After fixing Stretch in release team bug #879702, here's the
> > request
> > for fixing Jessie, since Salvatore asks for it. Debdiff attached.
> > 
> 
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#876630: jessie-pu: package db5.3/5.3.28-9+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #876630 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package db5.3/5.3.28-9+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
876630: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876630
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#876638: jessie-pu: package db/5.1.29-9+deb8u1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #876638 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package db/5.1.29-9+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
876638: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876638
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#882061: jessie-pu: package openssh/1:6.7p1-5+deb8u4

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2017-11-19 at 10:48 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 07:15:30PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 11:14 +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > This is the jessie version of #865986.  The WinSCP change isn't
> > > applicable to jessie, but the fixes for #865770 and #873201 are.
> > 
> > I've assumed that KiBi will be happy with this, given his handling
> > of #865986, but CCing for completeness.
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Uploaded, thanks.

Thanks. Flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Bug#880123: jessie-pu: package syslinux/3:6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u1

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sat, 2017-11-18 at 19:10 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sun, 2017-10-29 at 19:48 +0100, Lukas Schwaighofer wrote:
> > I hereby ask for permission to update the syslinux package in
> > jessie
> > as
> > well.  The update fixes a bug in the isolinux isohybrid MBR causing
> > boot
> > failures with some old BIOS [1].
> > 
> 
> Please go ahead.

Uploaded and flagged for acceptance.

Regards,

Adam

Processed: Re: Bug#882061: jessie-pu: package openssh/1:6.7p1-5+deb8u4

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 + pending
Bug #882061 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package openssh/1:6.7p1-5+deb8u4
Added tag(s) pending.

-- 
882061: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882061
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_sourceonly.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: 
libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_mips64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0128+dfsg-1+deb9u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mongodb_3.2.11-2+deb9u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_mips64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-25+deb9u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python2.7_2.7.13-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sqldeveloper-package_0.2.4+deb9u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_allonly.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_allonly.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_allonly.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml-libxml-perl_2.0116+dfsg-1+deb8u2_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_source.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: procmail_3.22-24+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python-tablib_0.9.11-2+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: syslinux_6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u2_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#882180: nmu:

[Laurent Bigonville]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello,

Apparently pycairo upstream broke the ABI a while back and the package
with this breakage has been uploaded (by me) in unstable today. (See:
#878080)

I don't think that reverting the break is a good idea has it happened
upstream sometime ago and IMHO we should just go forward.

The number of package impacted is quite limited[0], some have already
been fixed by a sourceful upload to day, the remaining ones are:

nmu pygtk_2.24.0-5.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild after pycairo ABI break"
dw pygtk_2.24.0-5.1 . ANY . -m 'python-cairo-dev (>= 1.15.4)'

nmu hippo-canvas_0.3.1-1.2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild after pycairo ABI 
break"
dw hippo-canvas_0.3.1-1.2 . ANY . -m 'python-cairo-dev (>= 1.15.4)'

nmu gnome-python-desktop_2.32.0+dfsg-4 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild after 
pycairo ABI break"
dw gnome-python-desktop_2.32.0+dfsg-4 . ANY . -m 'python-cairo-dev (>= 1.15.4)'

nmu gcompris_15.10-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild after pycairo ABI break"
dw gcompris_15.10-1 . ANY . -m 'python-cairo-dev (>= 1.15.4)'

nmu pygobject-2_2.28.6-13 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild after pycairo ABI 
break"
dw pygobject-2_2.28.6-13 . ANY . -m 'python-cairo-dev (>= 1.15.4)'

Kind regards,

Laurent Bigonville

[0] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=Pycairo_IMPORT

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_BE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=fr_BE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Processed: retitle 882180 to nmu: multiple python related packages

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 882180 nmu: multiple python related packages
Bug #882180 [release.debian.org] nmu: 
Changed Bug title to 'nmu: multiple python related packages' from 'nmu: '.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
882180: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882180
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#882180: nmu: multiple python related packages

[Laurent Bigonville]

On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:16:08 +0100 Laurent Bigonville  
wrote:


> Hello,
>
> Apparently pycairo upstream broke the ABI a while back and the package
> with this breakage has been uploaded (by me) in unstable today. (See:
> #878080)
>
> I don't think that reverting the break is a good idea has it happened
> upstream sometime ago and IMHO we should just go forward.
>
> The number of package impacted is quite limited[0], some have already
> been fixed by a sourceful upload to day, the remaining ones are:
>

I think that python-mapnik should be added as well to the list as well, 
it build-depends against python-cairo-dev and seems to use it

Bug#882194: stretch-pu: package spamassassin/3.4.1-6+deb9u1

[Noah Meyerhans]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hello. I'd like to fix a number of bugs in spamassassin, mostly related to
systemd service management. A debdiff against the current stretch version
is attached. All the changes have been in buster for some time. I've
tested them in fresh installation, upgrade, remove, and purge scenarios.

Thanks
noah
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/65_debian.cf 
spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/65_debian.cf
--- spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/65_debian.cf  2016-10-30 09:39:27.0 
-0700
+++ spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/65_debian.cf  2017-11-19 10:43:02.0 
-0800
@@ -25,3 +25,10 @@
 metaD_SENT_BY_CRON __CRON_FROM && __CRON_HEADER
 score   D_SENT_BY_CRON -5.0
 describe D_SENT_BY_CRONSent by Cron Daemon
+
+# As documented in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861671,
+# the bb.barracudacentral.org blacklist requires users to register, making it
+# unsuitable for use in the default configuration. If you've registered your
+# use of this blacklist, remove the following line in order to re-activate
+# this service:
+score RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT 0
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/changelog 
spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/changelog
--- spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/changelog 2016-10-30 09:39:27.0 -0700
+++ spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/changelog 2017-11-19 10:43:02.0 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,21 @@
+spamassassin (3.4.1-6+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+  * Ensure that spamd doesn't automatically start upon initial
+installation.
+  * Disable bb.barracudacentral.org (RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT), as
+it requires users to register. (Closes: #861671)
+  * Update the systemd unit file to use the same pid file as was
+used in the sysvinit script. (Closes: #808804)
+  * Update spamassassin docs to remove outdated gpg version
+compatibility note. (Closes: #853913)
+  * Update systemd unit dependencies to include network and syslog.
+(Closes: 864810)
+  * Fix inappropriate invocation of invoke-rc.d in cron script.
+(Closes: 865514)
+  * Fix spamd service manage on upgrades. (Closes: #865356)
+
+ -- Noah Meyerhans   Sun, 19 Nov 2017 10:43:02 -0800
+
 spamassassin (3.4.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Import upstream fix for spamassassin bug 7226: Enhance whitelist_from_dkim
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/rules spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/rules
--- spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/rules 2016-10-30 09:39:27.0 -0700
+++ spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/rules 2017-11-19 10:43:02.0 -0800
@@ -125,9 +125,10 @@
dh_testroot -i
dh_installman -i sa-awl.1p sa-check_spamd.1p
dh_installdocs -i
-   dh_systemd_enable --no-enable
dh_installexamples -i
-   dh_installinit -i -- defaults 19 21
+   dh_systemd_enable -i --no-enable
+   dh_installinit -i --no-start -- defaults 19 21
+   dh_systemd_start -i --no-start
dh_installcron -i
dh_installchangelogs Changes -i
dh_link -i
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.cron.daily 
spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.cron.daily
--- spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.cron.daily   2016-10-30 
09:39:27.0 -0700
+++ spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.cron.daily   2017-11-19 
10:43:02.0 -0800
@@ -53,8 +53,7 @@
 invoke-rc.d --quiet spamassassin status > /dev/null && \
   invoke-rc.d spamassassin reload > /dev/null
 else
-invoke-rc.d --quiet spamassassin status > /dev/null && \
-  /etc/init.d/spamassassin reload > /dev/null
+/etc/init.d/spamassassin reload > /dev/null
 fi
 if [ -d /etc/spamassassin/sa-update-hooks.d ]; then
 run-parts --lsbsysinit /etc/spamassassin/sa-update-hooks.d
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.postinst 
spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.postinst
--- spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.postinst 2016-10-30 
09:39:27.0 -0700
+++ spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.postinst 2017-11-19 
10:43:02.0 -0800
@@ -43,3 +43,9 @@
 fi
 
 #DEBHELPER#
+
+if [ "$1" = "configure" ] && [ -n "$2" ]; then
+if deb-systemd-helper was-enabled spamassassin.service > /dev/null; then
+   invoke-rc.d spamassassin restart
+fi
+fi
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.prerm 
spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.prerm
--- spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.prerm2016-10-30 
09:39:27.0 -0700
+++ spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.prerm2017-11-19 
10:43:02.0 -0800
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 # /etc/spamassassin without causing dpkg to complain on purge.
 
 if [ "$1" = "remove" ]; then
+invoke-rc.d --quiet spamassassin stop || true
 rm -Rf /var/lib/spamassassin
 rm -Rf /etc/spamassassin/sa-update-keys
 fi
diff -Nru spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.README.Debian 
spamassassin-3.4.1/debian/spamassassin.README.Debian
--- spamassassin-3.4.1/deb

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_powerpc.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: syslinux_6.03+dfsg-5+deb8u2_i386.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_mips.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: mongodb_3.2.11-2+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#882197: stretch-pu: package variety/0.6.3-5+deb9u1

[James Lu]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Dear Release Team,

I've prepared an update for Variety to fix some shell injection bugs caused by
crafted filenames. These fixes are backported from the 0.6.6 release which is
currently in unstable.

The debdiff is attached, and the full changelog is below:

variety (0.6.3-5+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium

  * Backport various security fixes from Variety 0.6.6:
- Fix shell injection on deleting files to trash, from upstream commit
https://github.com/varietywalls/variety/commit/475a5e076b9c8c7c83176214f84455dc78834723
- Fix shell injection in filter and clock with specially crafted
  filenames; upstream commit
https://github.com/varietywalls/variety/commit/65722237baa996b0ef2389cea693bfeeba62b224
- Harden ImageMagick calls against potential shell injection:
https://github.com/varietywalls/variety/commit/a7c134ecd494bb878c73df9f65cb838dbb57413a

Best,
James

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500,
'testing'), (450, 'unstable'), (101, 'experimental'), (1, 'experimental-debug')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE=en_CA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
diff -Nru variety-0.6.3/debian/changelog variety-0.6.3/debian/changelog
--- variety-0.6.3/debian/changelog  2017-05-06 16:43:32.0 -0700
+++ variety-0.6.3/debian/changelog  2017-11-14 12:42:11.0 -0800
@@ -1,3 +1,16 @@
+variety (0.6.3-5+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+  * Backport various security fixes from Variety 0.6.6:
+- Fix shell injection on deleting files to trash, from upstream commit
+  
https://github.com/varietywalls/variety/commit/475a5e076b9c8c7c83176214f84455dc78834723
+- Fix shell injection in filter and clock with specially crafted
+  filenames; upstream commit
+  
https://github.com/varietywalls/variety/commit/65722237baa996b0ef2389cea693bfeeba62b224
+- Harden ImageMagick calls against potential shell injection:
+  
https://github.com/varietywalls/variety/commit/a7c134ecd494bb878c73df9f65cb838dbb57413a
+
+ -- James Lu   Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:42:11 -0800
+
 variety (0.6.3-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Add fix-autoscroll-high-cpu.patch backported from upstream Bzr revision
diff -Nru 
variety-0.6.3/debian/patches/0001-Fix-shell-injection-on-deleting-to-trash-via-special.patch
 
variety-0.6.3/debian/patches/0001-Fix-shell-injection-on-deleting-to-trash-via-special.patch
--- 
variety-0.6.3/debian/patches/0001-Fix-shell-injection-on-deleting-to-trash-via-special.patch
1969-12-31 16:00:00.0 -0800
+++ 
variety-0.6.3/debian/patches/0001-Fix-shell-injection-on-deleting-to-trash-via-special.patch
2017-11-14 12:42:11.0 -0800
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+From 475a5e076b9c8c7c83176214f84455dc78834723 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: James Lu 
+Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 10:39:13 -0700
+Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Fix shell injection on deleting to trash via specially
+ crafted filenames
+
+Rewrite this code in subprocess.call (which doesn't spawn a shell by default), 
and explicitly check whether trash programs are installed before running them.
+---
+ variety/VarietyWindow.py | 31 +--
+ 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
+
+diff --git a/variety/VarietyWindow.py b/variety/VarietyWindow.py
+index b99cd1a..c9bb770 100644
+--- a/variety/VarietyWindow.py
 b/variety/VarietyWindow.py
+@@ -43,6 +43,10 @@ import urlparse
+ import webbrowser
+ from PIL import Image as PILImage
+ 
++# Replacement for shutil.which, which (no pun intended) only exists on Python 
3.3+
++# unless we want another 3rd party dependency.
++from distutils.spawn import find_executable
++
+ random.seed()
+ logger = logging.getLogger('variety')
+ 
+@@ -1721,14 +1725,29 @@ class VarietyWindow(Gtk.Window):
+ def _go():
+ self.smart.report_file(file, 'trash', async=False)
+ 
+-command = 'gvfs-trash "%s" || trash-put "%s" || kfmclient 
move "%s" trash:/' % (file, file, file)
+-logger.info(lambda: "Running trash command %s" % command)
+-result = os.system(command.encode('utf8'))
+-if result != 0:
+-logger.error(lambda: "Trash resulted in error code 
%d" % result)
++command = ''
++if find_executable('gvfs-trash'):
++command = ['gvfs-trash', file.encode('utf-8')]
++elif find_executable('trash-put'):
++command = ['trash-put', file.encode('utf-8')]
++elif find_executable('kfmclient'):
++command = ['kfmclient', 'move', file.encode('utf-8'), 
'tr

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: db_5.1.29-9+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: liblouis_2.5.3-3+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: mongodb_3.2.11-2+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: mongodb_3.2.11-2+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python2.7_2.7.13-2+deb9u1_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python2.7_2.7.13-2+deb9u1_s390x.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: mongodb_3.2.11-2+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python2.7_2.7.13-2+deb9u1_ppc64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_all.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: sqldeveloper-package_0.2.4+deb9u1_all.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: db5.3_5.3.28-9+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_mips.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#873877: jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u3

[Markus Wanner]

On 11/19/2017 11:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Technically it had only been accepted into oldstable-new. I've just
> flagged it for acceptance into opu.

Ah, I didn't fully parse the subject, and the body of the "...change
ACCEPTED into" only said:

> Mapping jessie to oldstable.
> Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates.

Thank you for clarification and for taking care.

Kind Regards

Markus Wanner

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python2.7_2.7.13-2+deb9u1_i386.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in oldstable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: flightgear_3.0.0-5+deb8u3_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libwpd_0.10.0-2+deb8u1_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxrandr_1.4.2-1+deb8u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: openssh_6.7p1-5+deb8u4_mipsel.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libofx_0.9.10-2+deb9u1_mips64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: python2.7_2.7.13-2+deb9u1_arm64.changes
  ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: charmtimetracker_1.11.4-1+deb9u1_mips64el.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: simutrans_120.1.3+repack-3+deb9u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_armel.changes
  ACCEPT
Processing changes file: xml2_0.4-3.1+deb9u1_armhf.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#882200: transition: sox

[Jaromír Mikeš]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,
new upstream release of sox bumps SONAME, so we need transition.

Direct reverse dependencies are:

bs1770gain
daisy-player
ebook-speaker
freedv
imagination
mlt

All packages above I tested to build with new sox and they build fine except
bs1770gain and freedv
bs1770gain failed with error ...
WARNING: 'aclocal-1.14' is missing on your system.
so not issue related to sox
freedv failed with error ...
./Build/src/./src/sox_biquad.c:101: undefined reference to `lsx_biquad_flow'
so some patch will be needed here

I will fill a bug aganst these packages (bs1770gain freedv)

best regards

mira