Don't need a job On Nov 19, 2017 11:45 AM, "final notice" <p...@debian.org> wrote:
> important information > > > <http://shineslim.com/cl/r-S5G1SM1G9B9S143KDS1E3O5SE3NS0S0S0S15S2SBSCCS21FS21OSA> > > > <http://shineslim.com/cl/ua-S5G1SM1G9B9S143KDS1E3O5SE3NS0S0S0S15S2SBSCCS21FS21OSA> > > > <http://shineslim.com/cl/op-S5G1SM1G9B9S143KDS1E3O5SE3NS0S0S0S15S2SBSCCS21FS21OSA> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: > release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu debhelper 10.10.7 > fixed a regression in debhelper 10.10.6 that prevented dbgsym packages from > being generated. There are probably several packages affected but I am not > aware of any easy mechanism to determine which packages were built against > debhelper 10.10.6 so I've just included a binNMU request for the two > packages I'm aware of that were definitely affected by this. debhelper > (10.10.7) unstable; urgency=medium * dh_strip: Fix a regression that caused > debug symbols for executables to be discarded instead of included into > debug packages. nmu xdg-desktop-portal_0.8-3 . amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el > mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m "Rebuild to include dbgsym > packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" nmu xdg-desktop-portal-gtk_0.7-3 . > amd64 arm64 i386 mips64el mips powerpc ppc64el s390x . unstable . -m > "Rebuild to include dbgsym packages after debhelper 10.10.7 fix" -- bye, > pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
