BinNMU for drizzle
Dear release managers, drizzle is currently not installable in sid: # apt-get install drizzle Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: drizzle : Depends: libdrizzledmessage0 (= 2011.03.13-1) but it is not going to be installed Depends: libprotobuf6 but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. I tried to rebuild packages from the source package. It works, packages can be installed and the drizzle daemon does start up. So could you please do a BinNMU for drizzle ? -- Laurent Bonnaud. http://www.gipsa-lab.inpg.fr/page_pro.php?vid=96 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1319109878.30772.3.camel@vougeot
Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?
Guillem, we, the Release Team of the next stable release — wheezy —, are concerned about the state of dpkg with relation to multiarch. Now, the news was already broken at DebConf that wheezy will indeed be released as multiarch-ready[0]. This might have been a bit premature, I guess. If we want to carry on with multiarch in wheezy it really should enter the archive now. The freeze deadline is approaching fast and we must be able to shake out all the bugs in the time that's left. Deprecating ia32-libs in a single cycle seems to be quite a bit of work, too. Currently nobody can test multiarch with in-archive software. The multiarch patches did not even land in experimental, despite some pokes from fellow project members[1]. It's been over a month since your last announcement[2] that 1.16.2 is "coming soon". If you have concerns over the implementation that's already in place in a Debian derivative please speak up now, so that they can be properly addressed in time. I can understand your desire to review the changes properly[3], but please don't let perfect be the enemy of good. We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to pursue this goal for wheezy. Kind regards and serious thanks for all your efforts, Philipp Kern for the Debian Release Team [0] http://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110726b [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2011/09/msg00077.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2011/07/msg00030.html [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2011/09/msg5.html -- .''`. Philipp KernDebian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `-finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 01:05 +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:16:52PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Unfortunately, after some more detailed review of the diff and some > > testing, I'm afraid we've had to reject the upload, as it stands. > > > > The issue is the move of the conffile simply using "mv". This leads to > > dpkg raising a conffile change prompt on upgrades even if the user has > > not made any changes. Note that this issue also affects the package in > > unstable, so would need resolving there first. > > After fixing the issue and testing upgrades from the 0.14 squeeze (both to > 0.22 and 0.14.2) I have uploaded a fix to both unstable and stable for this > issue. Hopefully it will be OK now. Thanks, and sorry for all the to-and-fro. For the record, 0.14.2 was accepted in to proposed-updates last night. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1319141787.23587.0.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: Bug#645324: CVE-2011-3369: Denial of Service
On Fri, 2011-10-14 at 22:53 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [and now actually remembering to CC -release *sigh*] > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 22:34:44 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Oct 2011 15:39:03 -0400, Frederic Peters wrote: > >> Uploaded 0.9.12-1 for unstable, and 0.9.8-1+squeeze1 for stable. > > > > As per the Dev-Ref section Moritz referred to above, the intention is > > that you contact the Release Team to discuss the upload, not simply > > proceed. Now that you have uploaded it will get processed in due > > course, but please follow the procedure outlined therein for any > > future updates. For the record, this was accepted in to proposed-updates last night. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1319141867.23587.1.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: quassel translations (was: Re: Bug#641062: pu: package quassel/0.6.3-2)
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 01:07 +0200, Thomas Müller wrote: > just for the record - a build dependency was missing, which prevented > the translations to be generated: > qt4-dev-tools > > Please expect upload of +squeeze2 soon. Also for the record, +squeeze2 was uploaded, and accepted in to proposed-updates last night; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1319141950.23587.2.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: ifupdown-extra upload to stable-proposed-updates
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 09:16:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks, and sorry for all the to-and-fro. > > For the record, 0.14.2 was accepted in to proposed-updates last night. Yes, saw the ACCEPTED in the mail queue. There's nothing to be sorry about, I should have implemented it properly the first time around. Best regards, Javier signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: nmu: remmina-plugins_0.9.2-3
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 645296 remmina-plugin-vnc Bug #645296 [remmina] [remmina] VNC connections no longer usable after upgrade to 0.9.3-3 Bug reassigned from package 'remmina' to 'remmina-plugin-vnc'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions remmina/0.9.3-3. > severity 645996 normal Bug #645996 [remmina-plugin-vnc] VNC plugin crashes on amd64: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > merge 645296 645996 Bug#645296: [remmina] VNC connections no longer usable after upgrade to 0.9.3-3 Bug#645996: VNC plugin crashes on amd64: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer Merged 645296 645996. > retitle 645296 nmu: remmina-plugins_0.9.2-3 Bug #645296 [remmina-plugin-vnc] [remmina] VNC connections no longer usable after upgrade to 0.9.3-3 Bug #645996 [remmina-plugin-vnc] VNC plugin crashes on amd64: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer Changed Bug title to 'nmu: remmina-plugins_0.9.2-3' from '[remmina] VNC connections no longer usable after upgrade to 0.9.3-3' Changed Bug title to 'nmu: remmina-plugins_0.9.2-3' from 'VNC plugin crashes on amd64: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer' > reassign 645296 release.debian.org Bug #645296 [remmina-plugin-vnc] nmu: remmina-plugins_0.9.2-3 Bug #645996 [remmina-plugin-vnc] nmu: remmina-plugins_0.9.2-3 Bug reassigned from package 'remmina-plugin-vnc' to 'release.debian.org'. Bug reassigned from package 'remmina-plugin-vnc' to 'release.debian.org'. Bug No longer marked as found in versions remmina-plugins/0.9.2-3. Bug No longer marked as found in versions remmina-plugins/0.9.2-3. > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was dktrkr...@debian.org). > usertags 645296 binnmu Bug#645296: nmu: remmina-plugins_0.9.2-3 There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: binnmu. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 645296: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645296 645996: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645996 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.131914922016912.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
