Bug#762209: marked as done (/usr/bin/zbarcam: zbarcam crashes immediately)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 16:20:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#762209: fixed in zbar 0.21-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #762209,
regarding /usr/bin/zbarcam: zbarcam crashes immediately
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
762209: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=762209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: zbar-tools
Version: 0.10+doc-9+b3
Severity: important
File: /usr/bin/zbarcam

Dear Maintainer,

Zbarcam crashes as soon as I start it:

gpall@mordor:~ $ zbarcam 
WARNING: insufficient v4l2 video buffer size:
vbuf[0].length=0 datalen=e1000 image=640 x 480 BGR3(33524742)
zbarcam: /build/zbar-VLRB7x/zbar-0.10+doc/zbar/convert.c:619:
convert_rgb_to_yuvp: Assertion `src->datalen >= (src->width * src->height *
srcfmt->p.rgb.bpp)' failed.
Aborted

It opens the window, shows the camera picture for half a second and then
crashes with the above error, rendering the package completely unusable...

Thank you very much,
Giorgos Pallas

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages zbar-tools depends on:
ii  libc6  2.19-11
ii  libgomp1   4.9.1-14
ii  libjpeg8   8d1-1
ii  libmagickcore-6.q16-2  8:6.8.9.6-4
ii  libmagickwand-6.q16-2  8:6.8.9.6-4
ii  libv4l-0   1.4.0-1
ii  libzbar0   0.10+doc-9+b3

zbar-tools recommends no packages.

zbar-tools suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zbar
Source-Version: 0.21-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zbar, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 762...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Boyuan Yang  (supplier of updated zbar package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:35:13 -0500
Source: zbar
Architecture: source
Version: 0.21-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang 
Closes: 762209 812954
Changes:
 zbar (0.21-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/patches:
 + Replace custom codespell typo fix patches with upstream
   applied one.
 + Cherry-pick upstream patches till 20190215 to fix grammar
   error in configure.ac script.
   * debian/control:
 + Mark libbarcode-zbar-perl, python-zbar and python-zbarpygtk
   as Multi-Arch: same. (Closes: #812954)
   * New zbarcam is no longer crashing. (Closes: #762209)
Checksums-Sha1:
 841d55e199d69ca78edd1c15119d90fbf2884a2c 2457 zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 daf61b230c8fe47798226a26627ebad47d615c1f 16056 zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 1396c7274d00de99281e9b0091a34fc93ab9c2f1 19683 zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 528e453cd1f5df468dd6a77a5be0680cbb8ace5a783e86225c7db93b61a20486 2457 
zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 327d9773e99a68ff6736ccb5b38186fd67b9b1741e3ba9d7a07a884c5c1f9ca8 16056 
zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 37ae42265f8c406fd49fb9d1d8fb58da2acbb13a4adfde997976931c6e0a6bb9 19683 
zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 e41b3486ec7f0571990be26f6e1122d7 2457 libs optional zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 af06a7bcccaaad5c41ae8049e752cf08 16056 libs optional zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 9cfeb87fb2e99eee80f8b53dabe37c19 19683 libs optional 
zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfncpR22H1vEdkazLwpPntGGCWs4FAlxm4VIACgkQwpPntGGC
Ws7QZA/7Bzkbue+VCh7bK+FvXlsODXE75KldaI9Npir639W/W7AMVdoK6GdECXSe
ktcKNtuLkqJfoywBMC2cXAlBGKAAznk2hZATXUj3RaJ7t0JQu6IahtU6Z5KcgcmV
OiTVrLwP8EQwQCpwKoTCEbJSl7Q6PW/T7LZWuV68ZEG8K6ZTo5MDtUxk3f3ssQOw
E33KXGF7wgRLQlrDQkBTgkIZY5o+6JwHC26xiY8IiRHBdOie/W57Y8pLfPVCaPdK
zAAPY/tB/U2e3YCVqOpcL4FId4NpSTTd3xGrcwN1nz0MSybwDCc9SYWaUlibCuqc
O42m7NeLUV6+KD

Bug#812954: marked as done (please multiarchify the library packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 16:20:20 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#812954: fixed in zbar 0.21-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #812954,
regarding please multiarchify the library packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
812954: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=812954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: src:zbar
Version: 0.10+doc-10
Tags: patch
User: d...@debian.org
Usertags: multiarch

patch at
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/235480163/zbar_0.10+doc-10build2_0.10+doc-10ubuntu1.diff.gz
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zbar
Source-Version: 0.21-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zbar, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 812...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Boyuan Yang  (supplier of updated zbar package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:35:13 -0500
Source: zbar
Architecture: source
Version: 0.21-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang 
Closes: 762209 812954
Changes:
 zbar (0.21-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/patches:
 + Replace custom codespell typo fix patches with upstream
   applied one.
 + Cherry-pick upstream patches till 20190215 to fix grammar
   error in configure.ac script.
   * debian/control:
 + Mark libbarcode-zbar-perl, python-zbar and python-zbarpygtk
   as Multi-Arch: same. (Closes: #812954)
   * New zbarcam is no longer crashing. (Closes: #762209)
Checksums-Sha1:
 841d55e199d69ca78edd1c15119d90fbf2884a2c 2457 zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 daf61b230c8fe47798226a26627ebad47d615c1f 16056 zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 1396c7274d00de99281e9b0091a34fc93ab9c2f1 19683 zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 528e453cd1f5df468dd6a77a5be0680cbb8ace5a783e86225c7db93b61a20486 2457 
zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 327d9773e99a68ff6736ccb5b38186fd67b9b1741e3ba9d7a07a884c5c1f9ca8 16056 
zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 37ae42265f8c406fd49fb9d1d8fb58da2acbb13a4adfde997976931c6e0a6bb9 19683 
zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 e41b3486ec7f0571990be26f6e1122d7 2457 libs optional zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 af06a7bcccaaad5c41ae8049e752cf08 16056 libs optional zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 9cfeb87fb2e99eee80f8b53dabe37c19 19683 libs optional 
zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfncpR22H1vEdkazLwpPntGGCWs4FAlxm4VIACgkQwpPntGGC
Ws7QZA/7Bzkbue+VCh7bK+FvXlsODXE75KldaI9Npir639W/W7AMVdoK6GdECXSe
ktcKNtuLkqJfoywBMC2cXAlBGKAAznk2hZATXUj3RaJ7t0JQu6IahtU6Z5KcgcmV
OiTVrLwP8EQwQCpwKoTCEbJSl7Q6PW/T7LZWuV68ZEG8K6ZTo5MDtUxk3f3ssQOw
E33KXGF7wgRLQlrDQkBTgkIZY5o+6JwHC26xiY8IiRHBdOie/W57Y8pLfPVCaPdK
zAAPY/tB/U2e3YCVqOpcL4FId4NpSTTd3xGrcwN1nz0MSybwDCc9SYWaUlibCuqc
O42m7NeLUV6+KDMAPq3FTpi4Gin4p878SREDXlmGTfN26cwSrx3lyE8AbnyHMPgO
GByRyw6Jy0PjJ5bwlLQQVyHrER0RWGyR6Zm1g1SyH8RzI1UZIB5oK72sjpDcHmHf
u3dbvnN5Qm7G7Opo2Nm0OQ0Zlyx59OpLxKGksvAjEyEVGryFY9+uRjjd1nRoJVqV
h3elpWdXmLtfgA5MJm/rWnZA6+P78qxy3VovX8zicWZ7E0udQgVuP0sNX2iwCzCu
jIjxbZ1kxB6DaQMowBmYIkf16SAOblB6hFBKYWNM5/qG3TPZ6883uFiFt9izqNmK
dGC+Eem2PxhNVebCmCHq+68gxQvUaPtpt2Ps7twlAtum/4Zq91o=
=v6gC
-END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---

Processing of zbar_0.21-3_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

zbar_0.21-3_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zbar_0.21-3.dsc
  zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
  zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#922414: irqbalance: avoid dependency on runit-helper for systems that do not use runit

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

Package: irqbalance
Version: 1.5.0-3
Severity: normal

irqbalance apparently now depends on runit-helper.

For systems without runit installed, that is a strange additional
dependency.

Would it be possible to remove that dependency (or move it to a
Recommends: or something) to help make simpler systems?  I like runit,
and use it on several machines, but on machines where i don't use
runit, i don't want a runit-related package unnecessarily installed.

all the best,

 --dkg

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (200, 
'unstable-debug'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental-debug'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages irqbalance depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.70
ii  libc6  2.28-6
ii  libcap-ng0 0.7.9-2
ii  libglib2.0-0   2.58.3-1
ii  libncursesw6   6.1+20181013-1
ii  libnuma1   2.0.12-1
ii  libsystemd0240-5
ii  libtinfo6  6.1+20181013-1
ii  lsb-base   10.2018112800
ii  runit-helper   2.8.5

irqbalance recommends no packages.

irqbalance suggests no packages.

-- debconf information excluded

zbar_0.21-3_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 10:35:13 -0500
Source: zbar
Architecture: source
Version: 0.21-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang 
Closes: 762209 812954
Changes:
 zbar (0.21-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/patches:
 + Replace custom codespell typo fix patches with upstream
   applied one.
 + Cherry-pick upstream patches till 20190215 to fix grammar
   error in configure.ac script.
   * debian/control:
 + Mark libbarcode-zbar-perl, python-zbar and python-zbarpygtk
   as Multi-Arch: same. (Closes: #812954)
   * New zbarcam is no longer crashing. (Closes: #762209)
Checksums-Sha1:
 841d55e199d69ca78edd1c15119d90fbf2884a2c 2457 zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 daf61b230c8fe47798226a26627ebad47d615c1f 16056 zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 1396c7274d00de99281e9b0091a34fc93ab9c2f1 19683 zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 528e453cd1f5df468dd6a77a5be0680cbb8ace5a783e86225c7db93b61a20486 2457 
zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 327d9773e99a68ff6736ccb5b38186fd67b9b1741e3ba9d7a07a884c5c1f9ca8 16056 
zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 37ae42265f8c406fd49fb9d1d8fb58da2acbb13a4adfde997976931c6e0a6bb9 19683 
zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 e41b3486ec7f0571990be26f6e1122d7 2457 libs optional zbar_0.21-3.dsc
 af06a7bcccaaad5c41ae8049e752cf08 16056 libs optional zbar_0.21-3.debian.tar.xz
 9cfeb87fb2e99eee80f8b53dabe37c19 19683 libs optional 
zbar_0.21-3_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=v6gC
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Processing of zbar_0.21-4_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

zbar_0.21-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zbar_0.21-4.dsc
  zbar_0.21-4.debian.tar.xz
  zbar_0.21-4_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

zbar_0.21-4_source.changes REJECTED

[Debian FTP Masters]

Source-only uploads to NEW are not allowed.

binary:libzbarqt-dev is NEW.
binary:libzbarqt0 is NEW.

===

Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.

Bug#910899: marked as done (zbar: SQ code support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:52:26 -0500
with message-id <5fe968bf8d5e971aa1915f9632efe615a0462257.ca...@debian.org>
and subject line Mark bug 910899 as done
has caused the Debian Bug report #910899,
regarding zbar: SQ code support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
910899: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=910899
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: zbar
Version: 0.10+doc-10.1
Severity: wishlist

I would like to offer the integration of SQ code support. This
technology is somewhat usable now.

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.21-1

Experimental SQ code support is present since v0.21 release.

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang--- End Message ---

Processing of zbar_0.21-4_amd64.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

zbar_0.21-4_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zbar_0.21-4.dsc
  zbar_0.21.orig.tar.gz
  zbar_0.21-4.debian.tar.xz
  libbarcode-zbar-perl-dbgsym_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libbarcode-zbar-perl_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbar-dev_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbar0-dbgsym_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbar0_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbargtk-dev_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbargtk0-dbgsym_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbargtk0_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbarqt-dev_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbarqt0-dbgsym_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  libzbarqt0_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  python-zbar-dbgsym_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  python-zbar_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  python-zbarpygtk-dbgsym_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  python-zbarpygtk_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  zbar-tools-dbgsym_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  zbar-tools_0.21-4_amd64.deb
  zbar_0.21-4_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#602954: marked as done (zbar-tools: zbarimg should accept an image on stdin)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:56:14 -0500
with message-id 
and subject line Mark bug 602954 as done
has caused the Debian Bug report #602954,
regarding zbar-tools: zbarimg should accept an image on stdin
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
602954: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602954
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: zbar-tools
Version: 0.10+doc-4
Severity: wishlist

currently, if i run 

 zbarimg foo.png

it does what i expect.

but if i do:

 zbarimg - < foo.png

it fails, saying "ERROR: specify image file(s) to scan"

accepting data on stdin makes it much easier to hook zbarimg together
with other tools in shell pipelines.  this would be a nice feature to
have.

Thanks for maintaining zbar in debian,

   --dkg

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.36-trunk-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages zbar-tools depends on:
ii  libc6  2.11.2-7  Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libice62:1.0.6-1 X11 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii  libjpeg62  6b1-1 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG 
ii  libmagickcore3 8:6.6.0.4-2.2 low-level image manipulation libra
ii  libmagickwand3 8:6.6.0.4-2.2 image manipulation library
ii  libsm6 2:1.1.1-1 X11 Session Management library
ii  libx11-6   2:1.3.3-3 X11 client-side library
ii  libzbar0   0.10+doc-4bar code scanner and decoder (libr

zbar-tools recommends no packages.

zbar-tools suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.21-1

This patch has been merged by upstream since release 0.21.

--
Regards,
Boyuan Yang--- End Message ---

zbar_0.21-4_amd64.changes is NEW

[Debian FTP Masters]

binary:libzbarqt-dev is NEW.
binary:libzbarqt0 is NEW.
binary:libzbarqt0 is NEW.
binary:libzbarqt-dev is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports

Processing of shhopt_1.1.7-4_source.changes

[Debian FTP Masters]

shhopt_1.1.7-4_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  shhopt_1.1.7-4.dsc
  shhopt_1.1.7-4.debian.tar.xz
  shhopt_1.1.7-4_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Bug#909104: marked as done (shhopt FTCBFS: does not pass cross tools to make)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:44:25 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#909104: fixed in shhopt 1.1.7-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #909104,
regarding shhopt FTCBFS: does not pass cross tools to make
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
909104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=909104
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: shhopt
Version: 1.1.7-3
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap

shhopt fails to cross build from source, because it does not pass cross
tools to make. The easiest way of fixing that is letting dh_auto_build
do it and indeed that is sufficient for making shhopt cross buildable.
Please consider applying the attached patch.

Helmut
diff --minimal -Nru shhopt-1.1.7/debian/changelog shhopt-1.1.7/debian/changelog
--- shhopt-1.1.7/debian/changelog
+++ shhopt-1.1.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+shhopt (1.1.7-3.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Fix FTCBFS: Let dh_auto_build pass cross tools to make. (Closes: #-1)
+
+ -- Helmut Grohne   Tue, 18 Sep 2018 06:13:48 +0200
+
 shhopt (1.1.7-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * QA upload.
diff --minimal -Nru shhopt-1.1.7/debian/rules shhopt-1.1.7/debian/rules
--- shhopt-1.1.7/debian/rules
+++ shhopt-1.1.7/debian/rules
@@ -12,9 +12,9 @@
 
 build-stamp:
dh_testdir
-   $(MAKE)
+   dh_auto_build
$(MAKE) clean
-   $(MAKE) SHARED=1 CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS)
+   dh_auto_build -- SHARED=1 CFLAGS=$(CFLAGS) LDFLAGS=$(LDFLAGS)
touch build-stamp
 
 clean:
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: shhopt
Source-Version: 1.1.7-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
shhopt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 909...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Boyuan Yang  (supplier of updated shhopt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:05:10 -0500
Source: shhopt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang 
Closes: 909104
Changes:
 shhopt (1.1.7-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/control:
 + Bump debhelper compat to v12.
 + Bump Standards-Version to 4.3.0.
 + Add Vcs-* fields to use git repo under Salsa Debian Team.
 + Mark libshhopt1-dev in Section: libdevel.
 + Move homepage to Homepage field.
   * debian/rules:
 + Rewrite using dh sequencer. (Closes: #909104)
 + Enable full hardening.
Checksums-Sha1:
 d178f7c322f677d40ab8e3ee251abe0112d36234 1878 shhopt_1.1.7-4.dsc
 a15397ab01f55d4748815e26ead7b7937abf9dc4 3908 shhopt_1.1.7-4.debian.tar.xz
 958c46803784502106fdbe8f1d72f06346e4234a 5794 shhopt_1.1.7-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c8616f92b1e7fcedcb6e51580787e86b90e77580597a4ce0e343228785a3f76e 1878 
shhopt_1.1.7-4.dsc
 626b372d530c3fc3f33e2d8f39b5a17413b475581153f1c904b053eb16ca6c7c 3908 
shhopt_1.1.7-4.debian.tar.xz
 43b4aadee0979ac61be400250d42e2ee489dde95556f5c0437bce1cd549c3e6a 5794 
shhopt_1.1.7-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 fd98ef6b889e1d843474e6d00e267a11 1878 devel optional shhopt_1.1.7-4.dsc
 6c07e751a26cc07c9fdfd4dd5b1d9127 3908 devel optional 
shhopt_1.1.7-4.debian.tar.xz
 3642a2d76c119b7ea226bbbdf58b5578 5794 devel optional 
shhopt_1.1.7-4_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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Bug#431318: marked as done (option to submit to lists.debian.org)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #431318,
regarding option to submit to lists.debian.org
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
431318: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431318
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.06.27
Severity: wishlist

Hi,
It would be kind of cool if one could "report bug" to the debian user 
mailing 
lists for some initial comments.  Based on those comments one could decide 
whether to actually submit the bug.
The biggest reason to do this with reportbug-ng is that the dependency 
info 
is so nicely generated.  :)

Featuritis?  Thanks for the nice program!
C.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.21

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  990 testing localhost 
  990 testing ftp.uwsg.indiana.edu 
  980 testing localhost 
   50 unstableftp.egr.msu.edu 
   25 feisty  us.archive.ubuntu.com 
   25 edgyus.archive.ubuntu.com 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.14
python-qt3| 3.16-1.2
python-soappy | 0.11.3-1.8


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#416586: marked as done (Please provide option to define own MUA/editor combo)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #416586,
regarding Please provide option to define own MUA/editor combo
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
416586: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416586
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.03.28
Severity: normal

There is no documentation on how one could set the mailer to
 use to send the report -- and the drop down list is incomplete.
 There is nothing that allows one to use emacsclient+gnus-mail as the
 preferred MUA.

manoj

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.20.1-mh1-skas3-v8.2
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL 
set to en_US.UTF-8)

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.4.4-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central0.5.12 register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-qt33.16-1.2   Qt3 bindings for Python

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

-- 
If entropy is increasing, where is it coming from?
Manoj Srivastava  
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#431788: marked as done (Add the possibility to send bug with webmail (gmail in my case))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #431788,
regarding Add the possibility to send bug with webmail (gmail in my case)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
431788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.06.27
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

I use this gmail account to deal with mailing lists. Using reportbug with
gmail is straightforward (but reportbug is not very user friendly).

If I want to use reportbug-ng with gmail, I have to select icedove, and then
copy-paste the recipient email address, the subject and the body text, to
send the bug with gmail.

I do not want to add a gmail account into icedove only to use reportbug-ng

Is it possible to add the capability of using webmail (gmail in my case) to
reportbug-ng?

Thank you,

David

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
900 unstable ftp.uk.debian.org
899 unstable www.debian-multimedia.org
500 stable dl.google.com
300 experimental ftp.uk.debian.org
299 experimental www.debian-multimedia.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python | 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.14
python-qt3 | 3.17.2-1
python-soappy | 0.11.3-1.8
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#433300: marked as done (Allow searching in the bug text)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #433300,
regarding Allow searching in the bug text
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
433300: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433300
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.07.12
Severity: wishlist


Would be nice if this was possible using the '/' key and/or Ctrl-F, as
I'm used to from web browsers.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.21-2-powerpc

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablemirror.switch.ch 
  500 stable  security.debian.org 
  102 experimentalftp.ch.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.14
python-qt3| 3.17.2-1
python-soappy | 0.11.3-1.8
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2

-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   |  http://tungstengraphics.com
Libre software enthusiast |  Debian, X and DRI developer

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#432129: marked as done (addtional information - no tags available)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #432129,
regarding addtional information - no tags available
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
432129: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=432129
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.06.27
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

there is no possibility to mark tags when you chose additional
information for a bug-report.
it would be useful to do this, especially, when adding patches-.

greetings from our 7th cug-conf!

david sporschill
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.21-2-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  990 unstablewww.toastfreeware.priv.at
  990 unstableftp.at.debian.org
  500 testing www.toastfreeware.priv.at
  500 testing www.debian-multimedia.org
  500 testing security.debian.org
  500 testing ftp.at.debian.org
  500 stable  www.toastfreeware.priv.at
  500 stable  security.debian.org
  500 stable  ftp.at.debian.org
  500 experimentalwww.toastfreeware.priv.at
  500 etchdebian.beryl-project.org
1 experimentalftp.at.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.14
python-qt3| 3.17.2-1
python-soappy | 0.11.3-1.8




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#440568: marked as done (No feedback on MUA invocation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #440568,
regarding No feedback on MUA invocation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
440568: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=440568
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.08.20
Severity: normal

If I attempt to use a MUA which is not installed on the system
reportbug-ng obviously fails to invoke it.  However, it offers no
feedback of any form to indicate that anything has gone wrong.
Similiarly, the exit status of the MUA is apparently ignored.  An
inexperienced user may assume that the bug has actually been submitted
and not realise that anything has gone wrong.

When the MUA is invoked via GNOME Terminal then that will report at
least some errors to the user (I'm not sure it'll report anything other
than failed execs, though I haven't tested).

--- System information. ---
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.21-1-powerpc

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstableftp.uk.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.3-2
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2


-- 
"You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever."


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#452818: marked as done (Misses support for Bugs: control field)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #452818,
regarding Misses support for Bugs: control field
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
452818: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=452818
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.30
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,

dpkg has introduced a new control field 'Bugs:' for packages from
external repositories. This field contains the email address to which
the bug report should be sent *instead* of the Debian BTS. This way it
is made sure that bug reports against packages that are not part of
Debian do not pollute the BTS.
The functionality of this control field is similar to that of the files
in /usr/share/bug/$package, which you still resist to implement
according to #422085. I hope you see the necessity at least in this
feature!

Cheers,
Fabian

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.22-3-k7

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 testing ftp2.de.debian.org 
  450 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  450 unstableftp2.de.debian.org 
  400 experimentalftp2.de.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.3-3
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#433580: marked as done (Doesn't adhere to bidi status)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #433580,
regarding Doesn't adhere to bidi status
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
433580: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=433580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.07.12
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n

reportbug-ng doesn't reflect the interface when the locale is a bidi 
one. At least when it's Hebrew. The expected behaviour is when running 
reportbug-ng as:

LANGUAGE=he_IL reportbug-ng
the interface should be reflected and all the items should be send in 
their reverse order compared to their "normal" Left-To-Right direction.


For the Hebrew translation to be useful[1] the interface must be 
reversed when the environment specifies such a locale. This is usually 
done automatically by the toolkit if the layout of the ui was done in a 
way the toolkit can recognize.


[1] And not just Hebrew, any other bidi language as well: Arabic, Farsi 
and some others I don't know about.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.22-rc4-mexhat

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstablemirror.inter.net.il

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.14
python-qt3| 3.17.2-1
python-soappy | 0.11.3-1.8
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#435849: marked as done (please map + on "ok" of close/moreinfo details dialog)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #435849,
regarding please map + on "ok" of close/moreinfo details dialog
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
435849: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435849
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.08.03
Severity: wishlist


beeing able to quickly ack that dialoge would
speed up heavy bug activity. :)

thanks

-- 
maks


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.4.4-6An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central0.5.14 register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-qt33.17.3-1   Qt3 bindings for Python
ii  python-soappy 0.12.0-1   SOAP Support for Python
ii  xdg-utils 1.0.1-2Desktop integration utilities from

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#416133: marked as done (Package history drop-down)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #416133,
regarding Package history drop-down
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
416133: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=416133
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.03.24
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
It would be really handy if the package name box had a drop-down history list 
with autocompletion, like Konqueror or Firefox.  :)

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.18-4-k7

Debian Release: testing/unstable
  900 testing security.debian.org 
  900 testing ftp.us.debian.org 
  900 testing ftp.sunet.se 
  800 unstableftp.us.debian.org 
  800 unstableftp.sunet.se 
  500 etchdebian.beryl-project.org 
1 experimentalftp.us.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-2
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.12
python-qt3| 3.16-1.2



pgpHuwl33ufXV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#636154: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Please add support for GMail and Hotmail webmails if possible.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #431788,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Please add support for GMail and Hotmail webmails if 
possible.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
431788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.24
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Many people usually works directly with webmail clients, like 
www.gmail.com, www.hotmail.com or so, and they probably don't want to 
install and configure a mail client like evolution, Kmail, or alpine, only 
to use it with reportbug-ng, please add support to use Gmail webmail, 
Hotmail, and other popular webmails for compositing bugreport mails in 
reportbug-ng, if possible.

Thank you very much.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32-5-486

Debian Release: 6.0.2
  500 stable-updates  cdn.debian.net
  500 stable  security.debian.org
  500 stable  cdn.debian.net

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-3+squeeze6
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.10
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.9
python-qt4   | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
xterm| 261-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.100.1+squeeze1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.






--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#479201: marked as done (Gmail, or at least $EDITOR as mail client)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #431788,
regarding Gmail, or at least $EDITOR as mail client
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
431788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=431788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.30
Severity: wishlist

I use gmail for mail. I appreciate that submitting directly to gmail
would be quite a bit of work to implement, but an option to open
$EDITOR or a text buffer with the email would be useful so that I
could copy the contents.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.24-16-generic


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#435553: marked as done (Add search on package names)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #435553,
regarding Add search on package names
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
435553: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=435553
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.07.19
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I wanted to submit a bug report on libgtk. Unfortunately, without 
knowing the fullname of the package (the name "libgtk2.0-0" is 
relatively unintuitive to most users) it's impossible to use reportbug 
to find existing bugs.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.20-1-686

Debian Release: 4.0
  990 stable  security.debian.org
  990 stable  ftp.nl.debian.org
   99 experimentalftp.nl.debian.org
   97 feisty  archive.ubuntu.com
  103 testing ftp.nl.debian.org
  102 unstablewww.fluendo.com
  102 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  102 unstableftp.nl.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.14
python-qt3| 3.17.2-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0~rc1-1
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2


--
palf...@tevp.net - http://tevp.net
Illegitimus non carborundum

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#457045: marked as done (Visually mark merged bugs.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #457045,
regarding Visually mark merged bugs.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
457045: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457045
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.30
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Hi,

the current visualization of merged bugs in rng is a bit poor.
They are simply listed as separate list entries.
You could either use repeatmerged=no, to only list one entry or if you
list all of them, mark them somehow as merged, e.g. using a common
background.

Cheers,
Michael


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.23.12

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstableftp.de.debian.org
  300 experimentalftp.de.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#458575: marked as done (Make it possible to manipulate the bug status)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #458575,
regarding Make it possible to manipulate the bug status
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
458575: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=458575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.30
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Hi,

it would be nice, if reportbug-ng offered a nice gui to manipulate the
status of a bug, a gui for the "bts" command, so to speak.
Operations like merging a bug, setting the severity, tags etc. should be
available from within the reportbug-ng gui.

Cheers,
Michael

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.23.12

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstableftp.de.debian.org
  300 experimentalftp.de.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.2-2


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#448847: marked as done (reportbug-ng: translations should tell the user to try to talk in english)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #448847,
regarding reportbug-ng: translations should tell the user to try to talk in 
english
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
448847: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448847
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.08.20
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n

I just help a friend to use reportbug-ng in a french environment. When
submitting a new bug, all dialogs are translated in french (that is
good) but there no indication that the summary (that will be the mail
title) should be preferably typed in english. Perhaps translators can
add a tip here.

  Best regards,
Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.4.4-6An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central0.5.15 register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-qt33.17.3-3   Qt3 bindings for Python
ii  python-soappy 0.12.0-2   SOAP Support for Python
ii  xdg-utils 1.0.1-2Desktop integration utilities from

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#445287: marked as done (doesn't report network error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #445287,
regarding doesn't report network error
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
445287: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445287
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.08.20
Severity: normal

After my DNS server was accidentally shut down, I invoked Rng and it
tried to get the list of bugs for a package and felt silently to resolve
the address of bugs.d.o, without telling anything else in the GUI than
the fact that it was downloading the bugs' list.

I only knew what was happening because I invoked it in the shell and saw
the backtrace there.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.21-2-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  990 testing www.debian-multimedia.org 
  990 testing ftp.nerim.net 
  502 stable  ftp.nerim.net 
  501 unstableftp.nerim.net 
  500 unstableftp.nerim.net 
  500 unstablearcanes.fr.eu.org 
  500 stable  security.debian.org 
  500 stable  ftp.nerim.net 
  200 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  200 stable  www.debian-multimedia.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.3-3
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2


-- 
nowhere@levallois.eu.org
OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#448852: marked as done (reportbug-ng: some Debian terms are not explained for novices)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #448852,
regarding reportbug-ng: some Debian terms are not explained for novices
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
448852: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448852
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.08.20
Severity: wishlist

  Hi,
  
  I just helped a novice user to submit a bugreport with reportbug-ng. I
had to explain her serveral terms for her to be able to understand what
she has to do. So, I have to explain:
  - the term 'WNPP'
  - the term 'l10n' (in the list of tags)
  - the level of severity (what means each level)

  I think that all of this should be explained (with a 'help' button added
near these terms for example) so that reportbug-ng can be used by novice
users

  Best regards
Vincent


-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.23-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.4.4-6An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central0.5.15 register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python-qt33.17.3-3   Qt3 bindings for Python
ii  python-soappy 0.12.0-2   SOAP Support for Python
ii  xdg-utils 1.0.1-2Desktop integration utilities from

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#482827: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Please add message for: "package not found" and "package has not bugs")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #482827,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Please add message for: "package not found" and 
"package has not bugs"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
482827: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=482827
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2008.03.28
Severity: wishlist

If I search a package with not bugs or if I misspelled a package name I 
have no message at all. But if I misspelled a packaged name I can think 
that package has not bugs


Ciao
Davide

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.24-20080427

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  990 testing www.debian-multimedia.org
  990 testing security.debian.org
  990 testing ftp.it.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.5.2-1
python-central   (>= 0.6) | 0.6.6
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.2-4


--
Dizionari: http://linguistico.sourceforge.net/wiki
Strumenti per l'ufficio: http://it.openoffice.org
GNU/Linux User: 302090: http://counter.li.org
Non autorizzo la memorizzazione del mio indirizzo su outlook


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#458571: marked as done (Please run debsums before submitting a bug report)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #458571,
regarding Please run debsums before submitting a bug report
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
458571: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=458571
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.30
Severity: minor

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Hi,

it would be a nice feature of reportbug-ng, if it would run debsums
before submitting a bug report.
If debsums detects a modified file, reportbug should issue a warning,
telling the user to reinstall the package.
Then it should let the user chose to continue with the bug report, if he
is certain, or abort.
The result of the debsums check should/could be added to the bug report.

Cheers,
Michael


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.23.12

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstableftp.de.debian.org
  300 experimentalftp.de.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.2-2


-- 
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away from Earth?



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#457189: marked as done (please add tab support)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #457189,
regarding please add tab support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
457189: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457189
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.30
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
It would be nice if it would be possible to open the bugreports in
different tabs.

Thank you for your fine work!Matthias Krüger
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 testing security.debian.org
  500 testing 141.76.2.4

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15
python-qt3| 3.17.3-3
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#492715: marked as done (doublequotes entered in input field summary do NOT get escaped, following * triggers shell filename expansion)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #492715,
regarding doublequotes entered in input field summary do NOT get escaped, 
following * triggers shell filename expansion
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
492715: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=492715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2007.10.30
Severity: serious
Tags: security

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Can create a bugreport against itself, indeed :)


How to encounter this bug
(do NOT repeat following steps on a production system unless you have read
"conclusions" below and really know what you are doing - use a testing
environment or wait until you have installed a reportbug-ng version with
this bug fixed):
-
(1)  In a running reportbug-ng instance hit Ctrl-N to create a new bugreport.
(2)  In input field "summary" enter a string containing a doublequote and
later a * character.  My first "unintended trial" was
crash on exit "glibc detected *** amarokapp: corrupted double-linked list: 
0x0808ded0"


Observed result:

Kmail compose window pops up, with all file names in $PWD of reportbug-ng
added to recipients list.


Conclusions:

(A)  Proper escaping of metacharacters in user input strings must ALWAYS be
tested prior to releasing software.
(B)  I am writing this report with my production system, therefore I surely
will NOT try redirection characters added to string in step (2).  Reporting
the possible "surprises" is left to another user :)
(C)  In /etc/bash.bashrc I have always a statement "set -C" (prohibit
overwriting of existing files by redirections apart from ">|").
In /etc/profile (for noninteractive shells) unfortunately I had to remove it
because it would brake a lot of scripts in Debian packages.


This bug is perhaps related to:
---
http://bugs.debian.org/474955


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.23.12roland2

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 unstablegd.tuwien.ac.at 
  500 testing security.debian.org 
  500 testing gd.tuwien.ac.at 
  500 oldstable   gd.tuwien.ac.at 
1 experimentalgd.tuwien.ac.at 

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.5.2-1
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.6.7
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.1-2


-- 
Roland Eggner



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#498014: marked as done (Wish for shorter column name than "Bugnumber", e.g. "No." or "ID")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #498014,
regarding Wish for shorter column name than "Bugnumber", e.g. "No." or "ID"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
498014: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498014
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.1
Severity: wishlist

The string "Bugnumber" is much longer than the actual bug IDs listed
below it.  This means that when you double-click on the edge of the
column header, to shrink the column to its smallest size, the
"Bugnumber" heading makes it take up more space than necessary.  This
is annoying on small displays.

I suggest using a shorter name, such as "No." or "ID".

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.5.2-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-debianbts  0.2.1  Python interface to Debian's Bug T
ii  python-qt44.4.2-4Python bindings for Qt4
ii  python-support0.8.4  automated rebuilding support for P
ii  xdg-utils 1.0.2-6desktop integration utilities from

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#478436: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Do not work with a proxy with password)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #478436,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Do not work with a proxy with password
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
478436: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=478436
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2008.03.28
Severity: normal

In a network with a proxy@password reportbug-ng do not use the system
proxy setting as all other Debian applications

$ rng --loglevel=debug
No handlers could be found for logger "DebianBTS"
root INFO Logger initialized with level debug.
MainWindow   INFO Logger initialized.

MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'o']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'op']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'ope']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'open']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openo']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openof']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoff']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoffi']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoffic']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoffice']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoffice.']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoffice.o']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoffice.or']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: [u'openoffice.org']
MainWindow   DEBUGneg: [], pos: []
Unhandled exception in thread started by >
Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/ui/MyMainWindow.py", line 213, in
loadAllBugSummaries
 bugs = DebianBTS.getBugsByQuery(query)
   File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/lib/DebianBTS.py", line 72, in
getBugsByQuery
 l = __soapGetBugsByQuery(query)
   File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/lib/DebianBTS.py", line 186, in
__soapGetBugsByQuery
 return __soapGetStatus(__soapGetBugs(*__translate_query(query)))
   File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/lib/DebianBTS.py", line 211, in
__soapGetBugs
 return soapServer.get_bugs(*query)
   File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 470,
in __call__
 return self.__r_call(*args, **kw)
   File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 492,
in __r_call
 self.__hd, self.__ma)
   File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 363,
in __call
 config = self.config)
   File "/var/lib/python-support/python2.4/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 187,
in call
 r.endheaders()
   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 798, in endheaders
 self._send_output()
   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 679, in _send_output
 self.send(msg)
   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 646, in send
 self.connect()
   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/httplib.py", line 614, in connect
 socket.SOCK_STREAM):
socket.gaierror: (-2, 'Name or service not known')


Ciao
Davide

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.24-1-686

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 testing security.debian.org
  500 testing debian.fastweb.it

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central   (>= 0.6) | 0.6.5
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.2-3
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#464843: marked as done (bookmark option)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #464843,
regarding bookmark option
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
464843: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464843
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2008.01.20
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Please add an option to bookmark bugs/packages/bugs from reporters-bugs 
and so on.


Thank you for your fine work!Matthias Krüger
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 testing security.debian.org
  500 testing 141.76.2.4

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.4.4-6
python-central (>= 0.5.8) | 0.5.15-0.1
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.2-3



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#489359: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] update-button)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #489359,
regarding [reportbug-ng] update-button
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
489359: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489359
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 0.2008.06.04
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I think it would be nice if reportbug-ng would have an update-button
which updates the currently displayed information (bugreport, bugreports
from a package and so on).

Thank you for your fine work!Matthias Krüger
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  500 testing security.debian.org
  500 testing 141.76.2.4

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
=-+-===
python| 2.5.2-1
python-central (>= 0.6.7) | 0.6.7
python-qt3| 3.17.4-1
python-soappy | 0.12.0-2
xdg-utils | 1.0.2-6



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#526122: marked as done (reportbug-ng: doesn't include any identification field in mail headers)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #526122,
regarding reportbug-ng: doesn't include any identification field in mail headers
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
526122: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526122
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Severity: normal

Hi,

there's currently no way to know that a bug report (or comment) was
generated using reportbug-ng.  It'd be nice to have an appropriate
User-Agent or similar field pointing at rng (including a version
number).
For example devscripts uses 'User-Agent: devscripts bts/2.10.48',
reportbug uses 'X-Mailer: reportbug 4.1' or 'X-Reportbug-Version: 3.48'.

Cheers,
Julien


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#507980: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Add a mode for tracking bug)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #507980,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Add a mode for tracking bug
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
507980: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507980
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.1
Severity: wishlist

It will be nice to have an option to track bug. For instance I send a lot of 
bug report and I want to know from time to time what are the bug report I send, 
and what are the progress made. In fact add a local traking bug option (using 
for instance a right button context menu)

Regards

Bastien


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.26-1-amd64

Debian Release: lenny/sid
  990 testing security.debian.org 
  990 testing debian.ens-cachan.fr 
   99 unstabledebian.ens-cachan.fr 
  500 lenny   kde4.debian.net 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-===
python  | 2.5.2-3
python-support   (>= 0.7.1) | 0.8.4
python-debianbts| 0.2.1
python-qt4  | 4.4.2-4
xdg-utils   | 1.0.2-6



-- 

"ROUCARIES Bastien"
 bastien.roucar...@enseeiht.fr
---




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#509991: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] (with evolution) Please add support for choosing default reporting mail address)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #509991,
regarding [reportbug-ng] (with evolution) Please add support for choosing 
default reporting mail address
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
509991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.2
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hello and many thanks for your work,

I'm using bugreport-ng with evolution and I think that it would be
appreciable to be able to choose the default email address used for
reporting bug (just as in reportbug in fact...) not simply using
evolution default's one...

Regards,

Jean-Louis Biasini

French, Vienna - Austria


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.26-1-686

Debian Release: 5.0
   99 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  988 testing security.debian.org 
  987 testing ftp.free.fr 
  986 testing www.debian-multimedia.org 
   98 unstableftp.fr.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-===
python  | 2.5.2-3
python-support   (>= 0.7.1) | 0.8.4
python2.5   | 2.5.2-14
python-debianbts   (>= 0.3) | 0.3
python-qt4  | 4.4.2-4
xdg-utils   | 1.0.2-6





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#530945: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] package specific information window too big)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #530945,
regarding [reportbug-ng] package specific information window too big
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
530945: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=530945
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.3
Severity: minor

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi!

When reporting bugs, for some packages (for instance, openoffice.org)
reportbug-ng shows a window which contains package specific information
about bug reporting. The text for openoffice.org is quite long, so the
window gets bigger than the screen: I can't read the whole text and
can't reach the OK button (I suppose there is one, as I didn't manage to
move the window in order to check it).

Maybe the text should be displayed in a box with panning bars.

Thank you, Giovanni.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.29-2-686

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstableftp.it.debian.org
  500 testing ftp.it.debian.org
  500 stable  ftp.it.debian.org
1 experimentalftp.it.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.5.4-2
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.3
python2.5| 2.5.4-1
python-debianbts(>= 0.3) | 0.3
python-qt4   | 4.4.4-6
xdg-utils| 1.0.2-6.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.




-- 
Giovanni Mascellani 
Pisa, Italy

Web: http://poisson.phc.unipi.it/~mascellani
Jabber: g.mascell...@jabber.org / giova...@elabor.homelinux.org
GPG: 0x5F1FBF70 (FP: 1EB6 3D43 E201 4DDF 67BD  003F FCB0 BB5C 5F1F BF70)




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#494282: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] ultimate user friendliness using WM_CLASS)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #494282,
regarding [reportbug-ng] ultimate user friendliness using WM_CLASS
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
494282: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=494282
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.1
Severity: wishlist

Hi,
users (and even developers) often have a hard time figuring out the
correct package to report a bug to. Reportbug-ng could do something
similar to:

 xprop  | grep WM_CLASS

That is: offering a crosshair that one can use to click onto a window.
Query the WM_CLASS to determine the name of the application and then
user dpkg -S to find out which package the window and therefore the bug
belongs to.
Cheers,
 -- Guido


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#498012: marked as done (Wish for "Using Reportbug-NG" text to be hideable.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #498012,
regarding Wish for "Using Reportbug-NG" text to be hideable.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
498012: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498012
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.1
Severity: wishlist

In the UI layout, a large proportion of the window is taken up by
"Using Reportbug-NG" text.  Using a pointing device, I can shrink this
space, but I can't work out how to get rid of it using the keyboard.

A more conventional layout, to me, would be to have that text appear
in a separate (non modal) window.  I imagine this second window would
have a "dismiss" button (closing it), and a "Display this window when
Reportbug-NG starts" checkbox.  If the checkbox is checked, the window
appears each time Reportbug-NG starts.  The window can also be
displayed by choosing "Help > Reporting Bugs" from the menu.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.5.2-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-debianbts  0.2.1  Python interface to Debian's Bug T
ii  python-qt44.4.2-4Python bindings for Qt4
ii  python-support0.8.4  automated rebuilding support for P
ii  xdg-utils 1.0.2-6desktop integration utilities from

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#526125: marked as done (reportbug-ng: please make it easier to distinguish initial report and followups)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #526125,
regarding reportbug-ng: please make it easier to distinguish initial report and 
followups
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
526125: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526125
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Severity: minor

Hi,

currently the only difference between the initial report and a followup
seems to be the To: header field pointing to submit@ vs @, which is
easy to overlook.  I think it would be useful to make the distinction
clearer for the receiving end.  Potential ways I can think of are a
'Followup-For:' pseudo header, as used by reportbug, or adding
References and In-Reply-To header fields pointing at the initial report.

TIA,
Julien


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#526271: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Show bug report immediately when there's only one entry in the summary list)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #526271,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Show bug report immediately when there's only one 
entry in the summary list
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
526271: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526271
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.3
Severity: wishlist


When there's only a single entry in the summary list, the main pane
still displays the 'Using Reportbug-NG' information until the single
entry is (double) clicked. It would be nice if the main pane immediately
displayed the single report in that case. This would be particularly
useful when invoking reportbug-ng with a single bug number, but could
also be nice in other cases.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.29.1

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstableftp.ch.debian.org 
  500 stable  security.debian.org 
  102 experimentalftp.ch.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.5.4-2
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.2
python2.5| 2.5.4-1
python-debianbts(>= 0.3) | 0.3
python-qt4   | 4.4.4-6
xdg-utils| 1.0.2-6.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.



-- 
Earthling Michel Dänzer   |http://www.vmware.com
Libre software enthusiast |  Debian, X and DRI developer


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#544526: marked as done (reportbug-ng: dependencies fulfilled by virtual packages lack information)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #544526,
regarding reportbug-ng: dependencies fulfilled by virtual packages lack 
information
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
544526: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544526
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Severity: normal

Please have a look at bug #544505¹ and notice that the crucial
information about the version of apt providing the
libapt-pkg-libc6.9-6-4.8 virtual package is absent from this report.

Sorry for not providing more detailed information here, but I don't have
reportbug-ng installed, and #544505 does not indicate the version of
reportbug-ng used.  To reproduce the problem, just start reporting a bug
against aptitude yourself.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


¹ http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544505


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#548871: marked as done (reportbug-ng: does not check for newer versions before reporting a bug)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #548871,
regarding reportbug-ng: does not check for newer versions before reporting a bug
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
548871: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.6
Severity: important

Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 13:18 +0400, Artur G. Sibagatullin a
écrit : 
> > (Side note: did reportbug-ng ask you about the existing, more recent
> > version?)
> 
> Oh. Sorry for reporting this bug. I didn't surf upstream bug database
> before reporting. I'll upgrade nautilus. Reportbug-ng didn't ask me that
> question. May be I should upgrade them too...

Thanks for the notice. This is clearly a bug in reportbug-ng, that makes
more useless bugs being reported.

Cheers,
-- 
 .''`.  Josselin Mouette
: :' :
`. `'   “I recommend you to learn English in hope that you in
  `- future understand things”  -- Jörg Schilling


signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#594216: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] doesn't handle non-ASCII characters in summaries ("?", "?", "?", etc.))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #594216,
regarding [reportbug-ng] doesn't handle non-ASCII characters in summaries ("?", 
"?", "?", etc.)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
594216: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594216
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.22
Severity: minor

reportbug-ng doesn't handle accented characters entered in the summary 
field correctly. Using either KMail or Icedove as MUA, the Subject is 
filled with the summary where unhandled characters are replaced by 
question marks. This report's subject is actually an unintended example 
of that. The characters I meant are "à", "è", "é".


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-1-686-bigmem

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
990 testing security.debian.org
990 testing ftp.ca.debian.org
500 unstable ftp.ca.debian.org
1 experimental ftp.ca.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
-+-
python | 2.6.5-13
python-support (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.9
python-debianbts (>= 1.0) | 1.4
python-qt4 | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils | 1.0.2+cvs20100307-1
xterm | 261-1
python-apt (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.96.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#565648: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] extraneous characters on the end of the line in evolution)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #565648,
regarding [reportbug-ng] extraneous characters on the end of the line in 
evolution
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
565648: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=565648
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.13
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

When Evolution is the user's default MUA, the bug report boilerplate
text contains an additional 0x0D end-of-line character. I usually
remove it from the text but for purposes of this bug report I left it
in. If the text is copy-pasted into another editor, e.g. gedit, the
0x0d "unknown character" glyph is not displayed.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32.3

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstablehttp.us.debian.org 
  500 unstableftp.lionroo.dyndns.org 
  500 unstabledebian.scribus.net 
  101 experimentalhttp.us.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.5.4-5
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.6
python2.5| 2.5.4-3
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.3
python-qt4   | 4.6-1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2-6.1
xterm| 253-1
python-apt   | 0.7.92


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.







--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#594217: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] files rejected bug reports due to stray space "Message with no Package: tag cannot be processed!")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #594217,
regarding [reportbug-ng] files rejected bug reports due to stray space "Message 
with no Package: tag cannot be processed!"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
594217: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594217
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.22
Severity: important

I filed 3 bug reports using reportbug-ng this morning. This is the 
fourth. These 3 reports bounced with the following explanation:


Your message didn't have a Package: line at the very first line of the
mail body (part of the pseudo-header), or didn't have a Package: line
at all. Unfortunatly, this means that your message has been ignored
completely.

Without this information we are unable to categorise or otherwise deal
with your problem report. Please_resubmit_  your report to
sub...@bugs.debian.org  and tell us which package the
report is for. For help, check out
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting.



The rejection mail also attaches the original, problematic mail. There I 
can clearly see a space before "Package:". However, when reporting bugs, 
I can't see that space in Icedove. It may be a character other than a 
space. When I get the bounce, I just take the mail sent, use "Edit as 
new...", remove the space, send, and the bug is filed correctly.


I've paid extra attention in this report not to insert a space 
unwillingly (since the cursor is originally positioned before the "P") 
and I made sure I do not see a space at the start, but I don't expect 
this one to be accepted at this first attempt.

Edit: It wasn't, indeed.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-1-686-bigmem

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
990 testing security.debian.org
990 testing ftp.ca.debian.org
500 unstable ftp.ca.debian.org
1 experimental ftp.ca.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
-+-
python | 2.6.5-13
python-support (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.9
python-debianbts (>= 1.0) | 1.4
python-qt4 | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils | 1.0.2+cvs20100307-1
xterm | 261-1
python-apt (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.96.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#549906: marked as done (reportbug-ng: please add bug number on additional information dialog)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #549906,
regarding reportbug-ng: please add bug number on additional information dialog
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
549906: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=549906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.6
Severity: wishlist

It would be nice to have the bug number on the Additional information dialog. 
Specially useful when you try to report many bugs at the same time!

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (101, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.5.4-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-apt0.7.13.3   Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii  python-debianbts  0.6Python interface to Debian's Bug T
ii  python-qt44.5.4-1Python bindings for Qt4
ii  python-support1.0.3  automated rebuilding support for P
ii  python2.5 2.5.4-2An interactive high-level object-o
ii  xdg-utils 1.0.2-6.1  desktop integration utilities from
ii  xterm 248-1  X terminal emulator

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#577796: marked as done (Should inform the user when BTS is not available.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #577796,
regarding Should inform the user when BTS is not available.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
577796: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577796
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.20
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Any attempt to query the program receives such as:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/rnggui.py", line 205, in 
 lineedit_return_pressed
 buglist = bts.get_bugs(query)
   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/debianbts.py", line 184, in get_bugs
 reply = server.get_bugs(*key_value)
   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 470, in
 __call__
 return self.__r_call(*args, **kw)
   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 492, in
 __r_call
 self.__hd, self.__ma)
   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 363, in
 __call
 config = self.config)
   File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.5/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 187, in call
 r.endheaders()
   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/httplib.py", line 860, in endheaders
 self._send_output()
   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/httplib.py", line 732, in _send_output
 self.send(msg)
   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/httplib.py", line 699, in send
 self.connect()
   File "/usr/lib/python2.5/httplib.py", line 683, in connect
 raise socket.error, msg
 socket.error: (111, 'Connection refused')

Since reportbug program could not connect the Debian BTS (!!), problem may
be there, however reportbug-ng should similarly report the problem rather
than present such tracebacks. There were no recent upgrades I recall that
would effect this package (outside possibly some python packages). 

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (650, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-davidb (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python   2.5.4-9 An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-apt   0.7.94.2Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii  python-debianbts 1.4 Python interface to Debian's Bug T
ii  python-qt4   4.6-1   Python bindings for Qt4
ii  python-support   1.0.7   automated rebuilding support for P
ii  xdg-utils1.0.2+cvs20100307-1 desktop integration utilities from
ii  xterm256-1   X terminal emulator

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#547560: marked as done (manpage : French translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #547560,
regarding manpage : French translation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
547560: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=547560
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Severity: wishlist


Hi,

this is the french translation of reportbug-ng's manpage, in po format.
(i am in charge of reportbug's manpage too, that's why i have done this work)



Hope it helps.

Thanks for your work

# Translation of reportbug-ng to French.
# Copyright (C) 2009 Debian French l10n team , 2009
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: PACKAGE VERSION\n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2009-06-30 20:02+0300\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-09-02 18:00+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: sylvain Cherrier \n"
"Language-Team: fr \n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

# type: TH
#: reportbug-ng.1:1
#, no-wrap
msgid "REPORTBUG-NG"
msgstr "REPORTBUG-NG"

# type: TH
#: reportbug-ng.1:1
#, no-wrap
msgid "April 2007"
msgstr "avril 2007"

# type: TH
#: reportbug-ng.1:1
#, no-wrap
msgid "reportbug-ng"
msgstr "reportbug-ng"

# type: TH
#: reportbug-ng.1:1
#, no-wrap
msgid "User Commands"
msgstr "Commandes utilisateur"

# type: SH
#: reportbug-ng.1:2
#, no-wrap
msgid "NAME"
msgstr "Nom"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:4
msgid "reportbug-ng - An easy to use alternative to reportbug"
msgstr "reportbug-ng - une alternative à reportbug simple à utiliser"

# type: SH
#: reportbug-ng.1:4
#, no-wrap
msgid "SYNOPSIS"
msgstr "SYNOPSIS"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:6
msgid "reportbug-ng [Options] [Query]"
msgstr "reportbug-ng [Options] [Requète]"

# type: SH
#: reportbug-ng.1:6
#, no-wrap
msgid "DESCRIPTION"
msgstr "DESCRIPTION"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:8
msgid "Browse, filter and report bugs in Debian's BTS."
msgstr "Parcourir, filtrer et déclarer des bogues dans le BTS Debian."

# type: SS
#: reportbug-ng.1:8
#, no-wrap
msgid "Query:"
msgstr "Requète\\ :"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:11
msgid ""
"The optional paremter Query behaves exactly like the query inside the "
"program.  Supported queries are:"
msgstr ""
"Le paramètre optionnel Requète se comporte exactement comme une requète à "
"l'intérieur du programme. Les requètes disponibles sont\\ :"

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:11
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:14
msgid "Returns all the bugs belonging to the PACKAGE"
msgstr "Renvoyer tous les bogues concernant ce paquet."

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:14
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:17
msgid "Returns the bug with BUGNUMBER"
msgstr "Renvoyer le bogue numéroté numéro_du_bogue."

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:17
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:20
msgid "Returns all the bugs assigned to MAINTAINER"
msgstr "Renvoyer tous les bogues affectés à ce responsable."

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:20
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:23
msgid "Returns all the bugs belonging to the SOURCEPACKAGE"
msgstr "Renvoyer tous les bogues appartenant à ce paquet source."

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:23
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:26
msgid "Returns all the bugs filed by SUBMITTER"
msgstr "Renvoyer tous les bogues enregistrés par ce déclarant."

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:26
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:29
msgid ""
"Returns all the bugs of SEVERITY. Warning this list is probably very long. "
"Recognized are the values: critical, grave, serious, important, normal, "
"minor and wishlist"
msgstr ""
"Renvoyer tous les bogues de cette sévérité. Attention, cette liste sera "
"probablement très longue. Les valeurs acceptées sont\\ : critical, grave, "
"serious, important, normal, minor et wishlist."

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:29
#, no-wrap
msgid "B"
msgstr "B"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:32
msgid "Returns all the bugs marked with TAG"
msgstr "Renvoyer tous les bogues portant cette étiquette."

# type: SS
#: reportbug-ng.1:33
#, no-wrap
msgid "Options:"
msgstr "Options\\ :"

# type: TP
#: reportbug-ng.1:34
#, no-wrap
msgid "B<--version>"
msgstr "B<--version>"

# type: Plain text
#: reportbug-ng.1:37
msgid "show program's version number and exit"
msgstr "Afficher le numéro de version du program

Bug#601234: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Make an option to open selected bugreport(s) in external browser)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #601234,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Make an option to open selected bugreport(s) in 
external browser
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
601234: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601234
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.23
Severity: wishlist

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Hi,
Please make an option to open selected bugreport(s) in external browser.
IMHO this will be serious usability improvement. At least until tabs 
will be implemented in bugreport-ng and bug(s) in embedded browser 
fixed, i.e. #601232


Thanks,
Petr

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32-5-686

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstableunofficial.debian-maintainers.org
  500 unstableftp.cz.debian.org
  500 unstabledeb.opera.com
  500 stable  dl.google.com

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-3+squeeze1
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.11
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.9
python-qt4   | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
xterm| 264-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.98.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.




--
S pozdravem,
Petr Gajdůšek


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#626235: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] reportbug-ng doesn't show forwarded bugs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #626235,
regarding [reportbug-ng] reportbug-ng doesn't show forwarded bugs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
626235: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=626235
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.22
Severity: normal

For example, bug #531933 for iceweasel-notify is forwarded to
xul-ext-notify. Search results for 'xul-ext-notify' include that bug
in reportbug, but not in reportbug-ng.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64

Debian Release: 6.0.1
  990 stable  security.debian.org 
  990 stable  ftp.de.debian.org 
  990 stable  deb.opera.com 
  650 testing ftp.de.debian.org 
  600 unstableftp.de.debian.org 
  500 proposed-updates ftp.de.debian.org 
  500 oldstable   ftp.de.debian.org 
1 experimentalftp.de.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-12
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.10
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.9
python-qt4   | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
xterm| 261-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.100.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.






--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

shhopt_1.1.7-4_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

Accepted:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 15:05:10 -0500
Source: shhopt
Architecture: source
Version: 1.1.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group 
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang 
Closes: 909104
Changes:
 shhopt (1.1.7-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * debian/control:
 + Bump debhelper compat to v12.
 + Bump Standards-Version to 4.3.0.
 + Add Vcs-* fields to use git repo under Salsa Debian Team.
 + Mark libshhopt1-dev in Section: libdevel.
 + Move homepage to Homepage field.
   * debian/rules:
 + Rewrite using dh sequencer. (Closes: #909104)
 + Enable full hardening.
Checksums-Sha1:
 d178f7c322f677d40ab8e3ee251abe0112d36234 1878 shhopt_1.1.7-4.dsc
 a15397ab01f55d4748815e26ead7b7937abf9dc4 3908 shhopt_1.1.7-4.debian.tar.xz
 958c46803784502106fdbe8f1d72f06346e4234a 5794 shhopt_1.1.7-4_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 c8616f92b1e7fcedcb6e51580787e86b90e77580597a4ce0e343228785a3f76e 1878 
shhopt_1.1.7-4.dsc
 626b372d530c3fc3f33e2d8f39b5a17413b475581153f1c904b053eb16ca6c7c 3908 
shhopt_1.1.7-4.debian.tar.xz
 43b4aadee0979ac61be400250d42e2ee489dde95556f5c0437bce1cd549c3e6a 5794 
shhopt_1.1.7-4_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 fd98ef6b889e1d843474e6d00e267a11 1878 devel optional shhopt_1.1.7-4.dsc
 6c07e751a26cc07c9fdfd4dd5b1d9127 3908 devel optional 
shhopt_1.1.7-4.debian.tar.xz
 3642a2d76c119b7ea226bbbdf58b5578 5794 devel optional 
shhopt_1.1.7-4_amd64.buildinfo

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=jaTv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Bug#631621: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Crash on not readable source.list.d/file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #631621,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Crash on not readable source.list.d/file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
631621: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631621
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.24
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

I did start report-ng for the first time and it did crash with the following 
output:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/reportbug-ng", line 72, in 
gui = RngGui(args)
  File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/rnggui.py", line 43, in __init__
self.setupUi(self)
  File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/ui/mainwindow.py", line 29, in setupUi
self.lineEdit = PackageLineEdit(self.centralwidget)
  File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/ui/packagelineedit.py", line 15, in __init__
cache = FilteredCache(Cache())
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 93, in __init__
self.open(progress)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/apt/cache.py", line 140, in open
self._list.read_main_list()
SystemError: E:Opening /etc/apt/sources.list.d/opera.list - ifstream::ifstream 
(13: Permission denied)


The file opera.list was only readable for user root (-rw---). Making it 
readable for all did solve the problem.

So IMHO reportbug-ng should check the accessability of the file and either 
report it in a more userfriendly way, or if the information is optional, just 
print a warning and continue without this file.

Greetings,
Gert

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.39-2.slh.1-aptosid-amd64

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  500 unstableftp.uni-erlangen.de 
  500 unstabledebian.netcologne.de 
  500 unstabledeb.opera.com 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-14
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.13
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.10
python-qt4   | 4.8.3-2+b1
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1-2
xterm| 270-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.8.0


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#636665: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] report modifying buttons may refer to wrong report)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #636665,
regarding [reportbug-ng] report modifying buttons may refer to wrong report
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
636665: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636665
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.24
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
It is possible to browse to other bugreports in the bottom pane, but the 
'additional information' and 'close bugreport' buttons still refer to the one 
selected from the top list. I think this behaviour is very counter-intuitive.

MM

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 3.0.0-ic7

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  500 unstableftp.uni-kl.de 
  500 unstableftp.de.debian.org 
1 experimentalftp.de.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.7-1
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.14
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.10
python-qt4   | 4.8.3-2+b1
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1-2
xterm| 270-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.8.0


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#597698: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Dialog appearing when reporting to iceweasel is too big)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #597698,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Dialog appearing when reporting to iceweasel is too big
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
597698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.23
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

If I report an issue in the package "iceweasel", there is a dialog
shown giving hints about where to report what and such.
This dialog cannot be resized and thus takes more than the height of
my screen (800px) in space. This dialog needs scrollbars and should
be resizable.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.35-fs

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org 
  500 unstableftp2.de.debian.org 
  101 experimental-snapshots qt-kde.debian.net 
1 experimentalftp2.de.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-2
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.10
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.9
python-qt4   | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
xterm| 261-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.97.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#601233: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] In displayed bugreport "Open in New Window" and "Save Link..." context menu options of hyperlinks do nothing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #601233,
regarding [reportbug-ng] In displayed bugreport "Open in New Window" and "Save 
Link..." context menu options of hyperlinks do nothing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
601233: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601233
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.23
Severity: minor

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,

In displayed bugreport "Open in New Window" and "Save Link..." context 
menu options of hyperlinks do nothing. They should disappear if 
corresponding functionality is not implemented.


Petr

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32-5-686

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstableunofficial.debian-maintainers.org
  500 unstableftp.cz.debian.org
  500 unstabledeb.opera.com
  500 stable  dl.google.com

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-3+squeeze1
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.11
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.9
python-qt4   | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
xterm| 264-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.98.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.




--
S pozdravem,
Petr Gajdůšek


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#729116: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Calling icedove instead of thunderbird)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #729116,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Calling icedove instead of thunderbird
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
729116: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729116
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.27
Severity: important

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,
reportbug-ng call icedove as default email client instead of thunderbird.

Follows the response of update-alternatives.

Command 608 of 109 #update-alternatives --display *mail*
mailx - modalità manuale
  il collegamento attualmente punta a /usr/bin/thunderbird
/usr/bin/bsd-mailx - priorità 50
  slave Mail: /usr/bin/bsd-mailx
  slave Mail.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/bsd-mailx.1.gz
  slave mail: /usr/bin/bsd-mailx
  slave mail.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/bsd-mailx.1.gz
  slave mailx.1.gz: /usr/share/man/man1/bsd-mailx.1.gz
/usr/bin/thunderbird - priorità 20
La versione "best" attuale è "/usr/bin/bsd-mailx".


The error is

ReportbugNG  WARNING  Grr! Calling the MUA failed. Status and output
was: 32512, sh: 1: icedove: not found. Length of the command is: 4682
ReportbugNG  ERRORCalling the MUA a second time with an even shorter
message failed. Giving up.

I will glad to help you again.

Regards
Marco Righi

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.10-3-amd64

Debian Release: jessie/sid
  500 testing www.deb-multimedia.org
  500 testing security.debian.org
  500 testing http.us.debian.org
  500 testing ftp2.de.debian.org
  500 testing ftp.fr.debian.org
  500 testing ftp.deb-multimedia.org
  500 testing apt.jenslody.de
  500 stable  repo.wuala.com
  500 stable  apt.spideroak.com
  500 debian  packages.linuxmint.com

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.7.5-5
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.15
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.11
python-qt4   | 4.10.3-2
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7
xterm| 297-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.9.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.





-- 
Think Marco, think different
web site:http://www.di.unipi.it/~righi/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#651376: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Many strings are not translated into Spanish.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #651376,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Many strings are not translated into Spanish.
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
651376: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=651376
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.25
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Many strings are not translated into Spanish.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-686-pae

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
500 testing security.debian.org
500 testing ftp.fr.debian.org
500 lucid ppa.launchpad.net
1 experimental ftp.de.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
-+-
python | 2.7.2-9
python-support (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.14
python-debianbts (>= 1.0) | 1.10
python-qt4 | 4.8.6-2
xdg-utils | 1.1.0~rc1-3
xterm | 276-1
python-apt (>= 0.7.93) | 0.8.0


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#691760: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Partially translated into Spanish language)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #691760,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Partially translated into Spanish language
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
691760: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=691760
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.27
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n

repotbug-ng seems to be partially translated into Spanish language, I'd like 
to complete the translation. Spanish is my tongue language and I already 
translated Quassel IRC application and kington-update-notifier into Spanish.
I'd need some feedback about how to proceed with reportbug-ng because I am 
only familiarized with .pot files method.


--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 3.2.0-3-686-pae

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  500 testing security.debian.org 
  500 testing cdn.debian.net 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.7.3~rc2-1
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.15
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.11
python-qt4   | 4.9.3-4
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6
xterm| 278-2
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.8.4


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#699169: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Calling the MUA failed: Syntax error: EOF in backquote substitution)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #699169,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Calling the MUA failed: Syntax error: EOF in backquote 
substitution
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
699169: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=699169
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.27
Severity: normal

reportbug-ng fails to open mail window (using claws-mail) with both
'miscellaneous' activated.
After multiple tries it works.

sh: 90: Syntax error: EOF in backquote substitution
ReportbugNG  WARNING  Grr! Calling the MUA failed. Status and output
was: 512, . Length of the command is: 3959 sh: 92: Syntax error: EOF in
backquote substitution ReportbugNG  ERRORCalling the MUA a second
time with an even shorter message failed. Giving up.

$ reportbug-ng

sh: 39: Syntax error: EOF in backquote substitution
ReportbugNG  WARNING  Grr! Calling the MUA failed. Status and output
was: 512, . Length of the command is: 1046 sh: 41: Syntax error: EOF in
backquote substitution ReportbugNG  ERRORCalling the MUA a second
time with an even shorter message failed. Giving up.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae

Debian Release: 7.0
  500 testing 127.0.0.1 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.7.3~rc2-1
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.15
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.11
python-qt4   | 4.9.3-4
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6
xterm| 278-4
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.8.8.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#729999: marked as done (reportbung-ng: fails at reporting version number of (some) deps/recs packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #72,
regarding reportbung-ng: fails at reporting version number of (some) deps/recs 
packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
72: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=72
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.27
Severity: normal

For some reason, it seems reportbug-ng doesn't gather versions number of 
some installed packages listed in the "Depends" (and maybe "Recommands") 
tables.


As you can see in this same bug report, it does the job well when it 
searches for packages reportbug-ng depends on.


It also succeeds with:
- tzdata

However, it fails with:
- dwb (no version at all, see live @ 
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728789#10 )

- iceweasel (no version at all)
- claws-mail (partially)
- openclipart-svg (partially)
- nginx-light (partially)

Obviously, all the above packages are installed, and dependencies are met.

Also gave a try with some uninstalled package:
- anjuta, versions aren't displayed, which is «normal»

Result doesn't seem random, since asking several times to gather infos 
about package «dwb» always produces an empty table.


All dummy reports for these packages attached.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.10-3-rt-amd64

Debian Release: jessie/sid
  500 testing ftp.fr.debian.org
  500 stable  ftp.fr.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.7.5-5
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.15
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.11
python-qt4   | 4.10.3+dfsg-1
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7
xterm| 297-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.9.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.

Package: anjuta
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.10-3-rt-amd64

Debian Release: jessie/sid
  500 testing ftp.fr.debian.org 
  500 stable  ftp.fr.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.

Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
Package: claws-mail
Version: 3.9.2-2+b1
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---


--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.10-3-rt-amd64

Debian Release: jessie/sid
  500 testing ftp.fr.debian.org 
  500 stable  ftp.fr.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends  (Version) | Installed
==-+-===
libarchive13   | 3.1.2-7
libassuan0  (>= 2.0.1) | 2.1.1-1
libatk1.0-0(>= 1.12.4) | 
libc6(>= 2.15) | 
libcairo2   (>= 1.2.4) | 
libcompfaceg1  | 
libcurl3-gnutls(>= 7.16.2) | 
libdb5.1   | 
libdbus-1-3 (>= 1.0.2) | 
libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.78) | 
libenchant1c2a  (>= 1.6.0) | 
libetpan15(>= 1.0) | 
libexpat1   (>= 2.0.1) | 
libfontconfig1 (>= 2.10.0) | 
libfreetype6(>= 2.2.1) | 
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0) | 
libglib2.0-0   (>= 2.35.9) | 
libgnutls26 (>= 2.12.17-0) | 
libgpg-error0(>= 1.10) | 
libgpgme11  (>= 1.1.2) | 
libgtk2.0-0(>= 2.24.0) | 
libice6   (>= 1:1.0.0) | 
libldap-2.4-2   (>= 2.4.7) | 
liblockfile1  (>= 1.0) | 
libpango-1.0-0 (>= 1.14.0) | 
libpangocairo-1.0-0(>= 1.14.0) | 
libpangoft2-1.0-0  (>= 1.14.0) | 
libpisock9 | 
libsasl2-2 (>= 2.1.24) | 
libsm6 | 
xdg-utils  | 


Recommends(Version) | Installed
===-+-===
claws-mail-i18n | 3.9.2-2
xfonts-100dpi   | 1:1.0.3
 OR xfonts-75dpi| 1:1.0.3
 OR xfonts-100dpi-transcoded| 
 OR xfonts-

Bug#648977: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] does not escape characters in bug title)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #648977,
regarding [reportbug-ng] does not escape characters in bug title
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
648977: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648977
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.25
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

When mail client is run, bug title is interpreted in shell. For example,
when using title like:

#v+
Bug title with `echo funny characters`.
#v-

The title becomes:

#v+
Bug title with funny characters.
#v-

This should not happen.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstableftp.pl.debian.org
  500 stable  dl.google.com
  500 maverickppa.launchpad.net
1 experimentalftp.pl.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.7.2-9
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.14
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.10
python-qt4   | 4.8.6-2
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1-2
xterm| 276-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.8.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#648224: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] no MUA brought up when reporting against hplip with "Send additional bugscript information if available")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #648224,
regarding [reportbug-ng] no MUA brought up when reporting against hplip with 
"Send additional bugscript information if available"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
648224: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648224
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.25
Severity: normal

I failed to report a bug against hplip until I disabled "Send additional 
bugscript information if available (recommended)". hplip does use a 
script, and an xterm shows for some time. Then, hplip's message about 
reporting upstream is displayed. But when I click OK, Icedove never appears.



--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
990 testing security.debian.org
990 testing ftp.ca.debian.org
500 unstable ftp.ca.debian.org
1 experimental ftp.ca.debian.org

--- Package information. ---
Depends (Version) | Installed
-+-
python | 2.7.2-9
python-support (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.14
python-debianbts (>= 1.0) | 1.10
python-qt4 | 4.8.3-4+b1
xdg-utils | 1.1.0~rc1-2
xterm | 276-1
python-apt (>= 0.7.93) | 0.8.0


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.





--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#628906: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Strange characters in the report)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #628906,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Strange characters in the report
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
628906: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=628906
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.24
Severity: normal

Hi,

When I create a report, strange characters are added at the end of each
line of the mail. I am using Evolution as mail client.

I keep these characters in this report.

Thanks for your work!
Mònica

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.38-2-686-bigmem

Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  900 testing security.debian.org 
  900 testing ftp.fi.debian.org 
  850 stable  security.debian.org 
  850 stable  ftp.fi.debian.org 
  500 stable-updates  ftp.fi.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-14
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.13
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.10
python-qt4   | 4.8.3-2+b1
xdg-utils| 1.1.0~rc1-2
xterm| 269-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.100.3+b1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.







--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#655663: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Please support sending copies of reports to other addresses (X-Debbugs-CC))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #655663,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Please support sending copies of reports to other 
addresses (X-Debbugs-CC)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
655663: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655663
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.26
Severity: wishlist

reportbug-ng does not support properly sending copies of an issue report 
being opened to email addresses. The ITS supports doing that with the 
X-Debbugs-CC custom header. Adding that header with common MUA-s like 
Icedove and KMail is surprisingly complicated, and as David Prévot 
points out, simply Cc-ing addresses once in the MUA is suboptimal: 
http://lists.debian.org/debian-publicity/2012/01/msg00056.html


reportbug supports this with the following prompt:
Enter any additional addresses this report should be sent to; press 
ENTER after each address. Press ENTER on a blank line to continue.




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#624825: marked as done (reportbug-ng: Dependence on xterm)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #624825,
regarding reportbug-ng: Dependence on xterm
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
624825: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=624825
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.24
Severity: minor

Does reportbug-ng really have to depend on xterm, instead of depending on
x-terminal-emulator?

Best regards
Torquil Sørensen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.38.4 (SMP w/2 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python  2.6.6-14 interactive high-level object-orie
ii  python-apt  0.7.100.3+b1 Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii  python-debianbts1.10 Python interface to Debian's Bug T
ii  python-qt4  4.8.3-2+b1   Python bindings for Qt4
ii  python-support  1.0.13   automated rebuilding support for P
ii  xdg-utils   1.1.0~rc1-2  desktop integration utilities from
ii  xterm   269-1X terminal emulator

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#710072: marked as done (reportbug-ng ignores LC_MESSAGES)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #710072,
regarding reportbug-ng ignores LC_MESSAGES
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
710072: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=710072
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.27
Severity: normal

I have my locale set the following way:
LANG is he_IL.UTF-8
LC_MESSAGES is en_US.UTF-8

According to the specs, this is supposed to provide a Hebrew locale with 
programs using their English translation.

reportbug-ng, however, shows up translated to Hebrew.

How to reproduce:
Set LANG to one language (for which reportbug-ng has a translation) and 
LC_MESSAGES to another.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.8-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.7.3-4
ii  python-apt0.8.8.2
ii  python-debianbts  1.11
ii  python-qt44.9.3-4
ii  python-support1.0.15
ii  xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6
ii  xterm 278-4

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#660477: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] segfault after showing image attachment)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #660477,
regarding [reportbug-ng] segfault after showing image attachment
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
660477: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=660477
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.26
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
There are some bugreports that have image attachments (example: #635293). 
Clicking on the link shows the image, but selecting a different bug in the top 
list while the image is shown causes segmentation fault.

Gdb backtrace:
Core was generated by `python /usr/bin/reportbug-ng'.
Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault.
#0  0x7ffbfa630c33 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtWebKit.so.4
(gdb) bt
#0  0x7ffbfa630c33 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtWebKit.so.4
#1  0x7ffbfa6eb840 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtWebKit.so.4
#2  0x7ffbfa35e9c8 in QWebFrame::setUrl(QUrl const&) () from 
/usr/lib/libQtWebKit.so.4
#3  0x7ffbfb64e3af in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtWebKit.so
#4  0x004c580b in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#5  0x004c5ff2 in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#6  0x004ccee6 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#7  0x005771c0 in ?? ()
#8  0x004824c6 in PyObject_Call ()
#9  0x005186e5 in ?? ()
#10 0x004824c6 in PyObject_Call ()
#11 0x00486086 in PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords ()
#12 0x7ffbff48c4e0 in sip_api_invoke_slot ()
   from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/sip.so
#13 0x7ffc008e2536 in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtCore.so
#14 0x7ffc008e2830 in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtCore.so
#15 0x7ffc008e2912 in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtCore.so
#16 0x7ffc0044deba in QMetaObject::activate(QObject*, QMetaObject const*, 
int, void**)
() from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4
#17 0x7ffbfe592fc5 in QAbstractItemView::activated(QModelIndex const&) ()
   from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#18 0x7ffbfe5934bf in QAbstractItemView::mouseReleaseEvent(QMouseEvent*) ()
   from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#19 0x7ffbfedd050b in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtGui.so
#20 0x7ffbfe0dc346 in QWidget::event(QEvent*) () from 
/usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#21 0x7ffbfe4804d6 in QFrame::event(QEvent*) () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#22 0x7ffbfe59035b in QAbstractItemView::viewportEvent(QEvent*) ()
   from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#23 0x7ffbfedd697b in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtGui.so
#24 0x7ffc0043b418 in 
QCoreApplicationPrivate::sendThroughObjectEventFilters(QObject*, QEvent*) () 
from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4
#25 0x7ffbfe08bc2f in QApplicationPrivate::notify_helper(QObject*, QEvent*) 
()
   from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#26 0x7ffbfe0913eb in QApplication::notify(QObject*, QEvent*) ()
   from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#27 0x7ffbff008fe3 in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtGui.so
#28 0x7ffc0043b28c in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal(QObject*, QEvent*) 
()
   from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4
#29 0x7ffbfe08cc32 in QApplicationPrivate::sendMouseEvent(QWidget*, 
QMouseEvent*, QWidget*, QWidget*, QWidget**, QPointer&, bool) () from 
/usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#30 0x7ffbfe109118 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#31 0x7ffbfe107f1a in QApplication::x11ProcessEvent(_XEvent*) ()
   from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#32 0x7ffbfe130252 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#33 0x7ffbff9190cf in g_main_context_dispatch ()
   from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 0x7ffbff9198c8 in ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 0x7ffbff919a99 in g_main_context_iteration ()
   from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 0x7ffc00465e2f in 
QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents(QFlags) () 
from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4
#37 0x7ffbfe12feee in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4
#38 0x7ffc0043a492 in 
QEventLoop::processEvents(QFlags)
() from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4
#39 0x7ffc0043a68f in 
QEventLoop::exec(QFlags) ()
   from /usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4
#40 0x7ffc0043e837 in QCoreApplication::exec() () from 
/usr/lib/libQtCore.so.4
#41 0x7ffbfefdf300 in ?? () from /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/PyQt4/QtGui.so
#42 0x004c580b in PyEval_EvalFrameEx ()
#43 0x004ccee6 in PyEval_EvalCodeEx ()
#44 0x00577901 in PyRun_F

Bug#706421: marked as done (reportbug-ng will not send bugs: fails invoking mail client)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #706421,
regarding reportbug-ng will not send bugs: fails invoking mail client
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
706421: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706421
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.27
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
This warrants higher severity if it's not caused by something weird on
my system.  May be related to 699169 and 440568.

   * What led up to the situation?
Launched reportbug from KDE4, selected kdesvn, report a new bug.
Dialog appears, which I filled out and hit OK.
Something flashed very fast on the screen and then disappeared,
leaving the dialog unchanged.
mutt is configured as my mail client; it is on the system.
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
Looked at .xsession-errors.
Launched from command line to look for errors.
Tried submitting a bug on a different package (reportbug-ng) with
normal priority (earlier one was minor priority).

   * What was the outcome of this action?
Nothing very promising in .xsession; I've done my best to excerpt a
section created while I was doing these experiments (below).
Nothing at all on the terminal.

   * What outcome did you expect instead?
An editor with my bug report coming up.


Comment: I am using a remote host for mail sending, though exim is
running locally (it can't send out).
A day or two ago I successfully submitted a bug via report bug (I
think); I'm not sure what's different now.  I have been updating the
system and adding packages to it; it is a fresh wheezy install.

kmail is also on the system.

<.xsession-errors>
plasma-desktop(6471)/plasma StatusNotifierItemSource::refreshCallback: DBusMenu 
disabled for this application 
plasma-desktop(6471)/kdecore (KConfigSkeleton) KCoreConfigSkeleton::writeConfig:
QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created before QCoreApplication. 
Application may misbehave.
QDBusConnection: session D-Bus connection created before QCoreApplication. 
Application may misbehave.
Error, cannot create transaction proxy 
QDBusError("org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.NameHasNoOwner", "Could not get owner of 
name 'org.freedesktop.PackageKit': no such name") 
plasma-desktop(6471)/kdecore (KConfigSkeleton) KCoreConfigSkeleton::writeConfig:
[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] virtual void 
Soprano::Server::LocalServer::incomingConnection(quintptr) 
void 
Soprano::Server::ServerCorePrivate::addConnection(Soprano::Server::ServerConnection*)
 New connection. New count: 12
[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] Soprano::ODBC::Connection::Connection() 
Soprano::Server::ServerConnection(0x7f83b4037370)
void Nepomuk::Query::QueryServiceClient::close() 
void Nepomuk::Query::QueryServiceClient::close() 
void Nepomuk::Query::QueryServiceClient::close() 
void Nepomuk::Query::QueryServiceClient::close() 
[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] virtual void 
Soprano::Server::ServerConnection::run() thread done.
[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] virtual Soprano::ODBC::Connection::~Connection() 
Soprano::Server::ServerConnection(0x7f83b4037370) 
void Soprano::Server::ServerCore::serverConnectionFinished() 
virtual Soprano::Server::ServerConnection::~ServerConnection() Removing 
connection
[/usr/bin/nepomukservicestub] void 
Soprano::Server::ServerCore::serverConnectionFinished() Connection removed. 
Current count: 11


<.reportbug-ng>
[general]
lastmua = mutt
sortbycol = 4
sortasc = False
script = True
presubj = True
wishlist = #808000
minor = #008000
normal = #00
important = #ff
serious = #800080
grave = #800080
critical = #800080
resolved = #a0a0a4

[mainwindow]
x = 0
y = 0
width = 1752
height = 1054
menubar = True

[listview]
bugnrwidth = 100
summarywidth = 1088
statuswidth = 100
severitywidth = 100
lastactionwidth = 100
hideclosedbugs = True



*** End of the template - remove these lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.7.3-4
ii  python-apt0.8.8.2
ii  python-debianbts  1.11
ii  python-qt44.9.3-4
ii  python-support1.0.15
ii  xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6
ii  xterm 278-4

reportbug-ng r

Bug#753819: marked as done (Please add support for adding attachments via bug-scripts)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #753819,
regarding Please add support for adding attachments via bug-scripts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
753819: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.31
Severity: wishlist

reportbug recently gained a feature where you can attach larger files as
real attachments instead of being pasted into the email [1].

This is an immensly useful feature, as otherwise the bug reports become
unreadable with large attachments. Please consider to implement a
solution compatible with what's been implemented in [1].

Regards,
Michael


[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526110#15
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#601232: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] if I click on mailto: hyperlink in showed bugreport nothing happens)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #601232,
regarding [reportbug-ng] if I click on mailto: hyperlink in showed bugreport 
nothing happens
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
601232: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601232
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.23
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Hi,

If I click on mailto: hyperlink or select "Open link" from context menu 
in displayed bugreport nothing happens. It should open e-mail client.


Petr

--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32-5-686

Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  500 unstablewww.debian-multimedia.org
  500 unstableunofficial.debian-maintainers.org
  500 unstableftp.cz.debian.org
  500 unstabledeb.opera.com
  500 stable  dl.google.com

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-3+squeeze1
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.11
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.9
python-qt4   | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
xterm| 264-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.98.1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.




--
S pozdravem,
Petr Gajdůšek


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#774170: marked as done (reportbug-ng corrupts non-ACSII characters in summary)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #774170,
regarding reportbug-ng corrupts non-ACSII characters in summary
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
774170: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774170
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.31
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Reportbug-NG requests to enter a ‘Summary’ for a new bug that will be 
used as a subject for e-mail message. The problem is that it somehow 
corrupts multibyte (UTF-8) characters, so that MUA receives question 
marks. E. g.:


“:help latex-suite” does not displays any help

would become:

?:help latex-suite? does not displays any help

I’ve tried it with Icedove and KMail, result is the same.

--- System information. ---

Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64

Debian Release: 8.0

$ locale
LANG=en_IE.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=
LC_CTYPE="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_MONETARY="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_PAPER="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_IE.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#718441: marked as done (reportbug-ng: tool does not find any bugs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #718441,
regarding reportbug-ng: tool does not find any bugs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
718441: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=718441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.27
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

I wanted to report a bug about kde-l10n-de, so I searched for this package.
Result: no bugs showed up.

I then tried to report a new bug, the window "Bug report details" showed up. I
entered the information, clicked ok - and that was it, the window closed. I was
not able to enter any information about the bug itself.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.7.3-4
ii  python-apt0.8.8.2
ii  python-debianbts  1.11
ii  python-qt44.9.3-4
ii  python-support1.0.15
ii  xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-6
ii  xterm 278-4

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#639441: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Black text color)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #639441,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Black text color
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
639441: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639441
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.22
Severity: minor

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Some of the entries in the bugs list are written in black (normal open bugs,
as far as I can tell), which renders them invisible when the window has a
black background color. I believe the correct solution would be to use the
default system text color. Other suggestion would be to provide a
preferences/options dialogue that enabled color customizing.

Thanks for good job so far!

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64

Debian Release: 6.0.2
  500 stable  www.debian-multimedia.org
  500 stable  security.debian.org
  500 stable  debian.las.ic.unicamp.br

--- Package information. ---
Depends(Version) | Installed
-+-
python   | 2.6.6-3+squeeze6
python-support   (>= 0.90.0) | 1.0.10
python-debianbts(>= 1.0) | 1.9
python-qt4   | 4.7.3-1+b1
xdg-utils| 1.0.2+cvs20100307-2
xterm| 261-1
python-apt   (>= 0.7.93) | 0.7.100.1+squeeze1


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#898499: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] sigsegv on exit)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #898499,
regarding [reportbug-ng] sigsegv on exit
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
898499: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=898499
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

reportbug-ng crashed on quit after viewing several bug reports on x86

Thread 5 "Qt bearer threa" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 

[Switching to Thread 0xa4b3eb40 (LWP 31996)]
0xb735bb04 in QAbstractEventDispatcherPrivate::allocateTimerId() () 

   from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
(gdb) bt
#0  0xb735bb04 in QAbstractEventDispatcherPrivate::allocateTimerId() () 

at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#1  0xb735c239 in QAbstractEventDispatcher::registerTimer(int, Qt::TimerType, 
QObject*) ()  
at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#2  0xb739732f in QObject::startTimer(int, Qt::TimerType) () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#3  0xb73a32e6 in QTimer::start() () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#4  0xb3351b6b in QNetworkConfigurationManagerPrivate::startPolling() ()

at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQt5Network.so.5
#5  0xb335211f in QNetworkConfigurationManagerPrivate::updateConfigurations() 
()
at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQt5Network.so.5
#6  0xb33d8d09 in  () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libQt5Network.so.5 

#7  0xb73922c0 in QMetaCallEvent::placeMetaCall(QObject*) () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#8  0xb7396293 in QObject::event(QEvent*) () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#9  0xb735fe87 in QCoreApplication::notifyInternal2(QObject*, QEvent*) ()   

at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#10 0xb7362c94 in QCoreApplicationPrivate::sendPostedEvents(QObject*, int, 
QThreadData*) () 
at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#11 0xb73631d7 in QCoreApplication::sendPostedEvents(QObject*, int) ()  

at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#12 0xb73c5743 in  () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5   

#13 0xb697df30 in g_main_context_dispatch () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
#14 0xb697e1a9 in  () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0   

#15 0xb697e254 in g_main_context_iteration () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0   
#16 0xb73c4c83 in 
QEventDispatcherGlib::processEvents(QFlags) ()   
  
at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#17 0xb735dcfd in QEventLoop::exec(QFlags) ()

at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#18 0xb71679a1 in QThread::exec() () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5
#19 0xb7167af8 in QThread::run() () at 
/usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5 
#20 0xb716d63c in  () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/sse2/libQt5Core.so.5   

#21 0xb7f9b3a6 in start_thread (arg=0xa4b3eb40) at pthread_create.c:463 

#22 0xb7d894d6 in clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S:108   



--- System information. ---
Architecture: 
Kernel:   Linux 4.15.0-2-686

Debian Release: buster/sid
  500 testing ftp.de.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-==
python:any(>= 2.7.5-5~) | 
python-debianbts   (>= 1.0) | 2.7.2
python-pyqt5| 5.10.1+dfsg-1
python-pyqt5.qtwebkit   | 5.10.1+dfsg-1
xdg-utils   | 1.1.2-2
xterm   | 333-1
python-apt  (>= 0.7.93) | 1.6.0


Package's Recommends fiel

Bug#771030: marked as done (reportbug-ng: reportbug does not allow to edit bugreport, hangs)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #771030,
regarding reportbug-ng: reportbug does not allow to edit bugreport, hangs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
771030: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771030
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.31
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

I installed reportbug-ng and attempted to use it to report a bug in vlc. The 
reportbug-ng interface presented a dialog with the options including bug 
severity, short description, etc. On pressing 'OK' button reportbug-ng 
presented a dialog with further debug information for vlc, with only 'OK' 
button available. After pressing 'OK' button, reportbug-ng reverted to search 
screen. I did not know what to do at this point, as there had been no 
indication that a bugreport had been sent and I had expected to be asked for 
more information before sending the report. I chose "Additional Information" 
from the Bugs menu and reportbug-ng hung. It did not respond to any input so I 
used xkill to kill it.

I then checked bugs.debian.org and did not see any reference to the bug I had 
attempted to file. 

Then I started reportbug-ng again from a terminal and duplicated the steps 
above. This time, after pressing the OK button the second time, reportbug-ng 
returned to the search screen but the "Additional Information" item on the Bugs 
menu is grayed out.
Reportbug-ng did not hang again, but the following message:
ReportbugNG  WARNING  Mailbody to long for os.pipe
showed up on the terminal output.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-updates'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), 
(500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.7.8-2
ii  python-apt0.9.3.11
ii  python-debianbts  1.12
ii  python-qt44.11.2+dfsg-1
pn  python:any
ii  xdg-utils 1.1.0~rc1+git20111210-7.1
ii  xterm 312-1

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#841527: marked as done (reportbug-ng: Missing installed packages versions in the reports)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #841527,
regarding reportbug-ng: Missing installed packages versions in the reports
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
841527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841527
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: important

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

The reported bugs we are receiving that were generated with reportbug-ng are 
missing the installed packages versions.

For example, see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=841451

This reduces the usefulness of the reports considerably for us.

Happy hacking,

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'buildd-unstable'), (500, 
'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, armhf

Kernel: Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python-apt 1.1.0~beta5
ii  python-debianbts   2.6.1
ii  python-pyqt5   5.7+dfsg-2
ii  python-pyqt5.qtwebkit  5.7+dfsg-2
pn  python:any 
ii  xdg-utils  1.1.1-1
ii  xterm  325-1

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

- -- no debconf information

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
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=qLrL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#755392: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Smart handling for bugs against "general" psedo package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #755392,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Smart handling for bugs against "general" psedo package
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
755392: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755392
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.31
Severity: wishlist

In order to reduce the number of bugs reported against the "general"
pseudo package that are more a support request rather than real bugs,
the reportbug-ng shall perform some pre-filtering. The following list
provide some idea about what can be done, but is not exclusive.

1) Display a warning message that this package is meant for experienced
users only and can not use reportbug-ng to fill bugs against this
package.

2) Ensure that call to reportbug launches reportbug-ng whenever DISPLAY
environment variable is set by diverting /usr/bin/reportbug.

Cheers,
Abou Al Montacir



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#764747: marked as done ([reportbug] typo within german localisation "Fehlerbericht Details")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #764747,
regarding [reportbug] typo within german localisation "Fehlerbericht Details"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
764747: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764747
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug
Version: 6.5.1
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

There is a typo at the german localisation within  "Neuer Fehlerbericht" 
--> "Fehlerbericht Details". There at the moment can be read: "Bitte 
geben sie Details über den Fehler an, den sie bereichten wollen."


Word "bereichten" should be "berichten".

Greetings

Andreas Hausmann
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#764750: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] typo within german localisation "Fehlerbericht Details")

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #764750,
regarding [reportbug-ng] typo within german localisation "Fehlerbericht Details"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
764750: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=764750
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.31
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

There is a typo at the german localisation within  "Neuer Fehlerbericht" -->
"Fehlerbericht Details". There at the moment can be read: "Bitte geben sie
 Details über den Fehler an, den sie bereichten wollen."

 Word "bereichten" should be "berichten".

Regards

Andreas Hausmann
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#784772: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Dark Theme not Applied)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #784772,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Dark Theme not Applied
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
784772: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784772
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.31
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Dear Maintainer,

when applying the Dark Theme from the Tweak Tool it has no effect on the 
reportbug-ng window. 


This seems to be related to:


Debian Bug report logs - #769197
gnome-terminal: Dark theme not applied


Package: gnome-terminal; Maintainer for gnome-terminal is Debian GNOME 
Maintainers ; Source for 
gnome-terminal is src:gnome-terminal.
Reported by: Carlo Marchiori 
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 05:06:02 UTC
Severity: minor
Found in versions 3.14.2-1, gnome-terminal/3.14.1-1




Thanks, 
Luca




--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64

Debian Release: 8.0
  500 stable-updates  ftp.it.debian.org 
  500 stable  security.debian.org 
  500 stable  ftp.it.debian.org 
  500 proposed-updates ftp.it.debian.org 

--- Package information. ---
Package's Depends field is empty.

Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#817153: marked as done (MUA is opened with empty email)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #817153,
regarding MUA is opened with empty email
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
817153: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=817153
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 1.31
Severity: grave

Contrary to reportbug and previous behaviour of reportbug-ng (if memory 
serves), now reportbug-ng opens my MUA with an empty mail instead of a 
pre-filled report with the informations I gave in reportbug-ng's UI.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (900, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (500, 
'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python2.7.9-1
ii  python-apt1.0.1
ii  python-debianbts  2.4
ii  python-qt44.11.4+dfsg-1+b2
pn  python:any
ii  xdg-utils 1.1.1-1
ii  xterm 320-1

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#899089: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Allow for arbitrary tags in package searches)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #899089,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Allow for arbitrary tags in package searches
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
899089: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=899089
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Upstream seems dead, and this is really a Debian specific
package, so I'm posting a feature request (actually implementation)
that I already sent upstream [1].

The referenced PR handles request errors more gracefully (than simply
crashing), and allows the user to pass arbitrary supported tags to
the Debian BTS SOAP search interface.

[1] https://github.com/venthur/reportbug-ng/pull/6
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#832708: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Generate incorrect URL encoded mail content)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #832708,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Generate incorrect URL encoded mail content
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
832708: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832708
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: important

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

Dear maintainer,

When reporting a new bug, the generated mail is URL encoded, leading to 
unreadable content (visible %5B, %5D, %0D%0A, %3A…).

Enclosed to this bug report, the generated bug report for this bug report, as 
displayed on the MUA (MUA used : kmail 4:16.04.3-1).

Regards,

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64

Debian Release: stretch/sid
  990 testing vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion 
  990 stable-updates  vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion 
  990 stable  vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion 
  990 stable  dju2peblv7upfz3q.onion 
  400 unstablevwakviie2ienjx6t.onion 
  400 unstabledeb.torproject.org 
  100 jessie-backports vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion 
1 experimentalvwakviie2ienjx6t.onion 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-==
python:any(>= 2.7.5-5~) | 
python-debianbts   (>= 1.0) | 2.6.1
python-pyqt5| 5.6+dfsg-1+b1
python-pyqt5.qtwebkit   | 5.6+dfsg-1+b1
xdg-utils   | 1.1.1-1
xterm   | 325-1
python-apt  (>= 0.7.93) | 1.1.0~beta4


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
--
Aeris
Individual crypto-terrorist group self-radicalized on the digital Internet
https://imirhil.fr/

Protect your privacy, encrypt your communications
GPG : EFB74277 ECE4E222
OTR : 5769616D 2D3DAC72
https://café-vie-privée.fr/
%5Breportbug-ng%5D Generate URL%3Fencoded mail content

Package%3A reportbug-ng%0D%0AVersion%3A 2.1%0D%0ASeverity%3A 
important%0D%0A%0D%0A--- Please enter the report below this line. 
---%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0A--- System information. ---%0D%0AArchitecture%3A 
amd64%0D%0AKernel%3A   Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64%0D%0A%0D%0ADebian Release%3A 
stretch/sid%0D%0A  990 testing vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion %0D%0A  990 
testing deb.torproject.org %0D%0A  990 stable-updates  
vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion %0D%0A  990 stable  vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion 
%0D%0A  990 stable  dju2peblv7upfz3q.onion %0D%0A  990 stable  
deb.torproject.org %0D%0A  500 nightly pkg.tox.chat %0D%0A  500 
jessie-backports mozilla.debian.net %0D%0A  500 jessie  packagecloud.io 
%0D%0A  400 unstablevwakviie2ienjx6t.onion %0D%0A  400 unstable
deb.torproject.org %0D%0A  100 jessie-backports vwakviie2ienjx6t.onion %0D%0A   
 1 experimentalvwakviie2ienjx6t.onion %0D%0A%0D%0A--- Package information. 
---%0D%0ADepends   %28Version%29 | 
Installed%0D%0A===-%2B-==%0D%0Apython%3Aany
%28>= 2.7.5-5~%29 | %0D%0Apython-debianbts   %28>= 
1.0%29 | 2.6.1%0D%0Apython-pyqt5| 
5.6%2Bdfsg-1%2Bb1%0D%0Apython-pyqt5.qtwebkit   | 
5.6%2Bdfsg-1%2Bb1%0D%0Axdg-utils   | 
1.1.1-1%0D%0Axterm   | 325-1%0D%0Apython-apt
  %28>= 0.7.93%29 | 1.1.0~beta4%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0APackage%27s 
Recommends field is empty.%0D%0A%0D%0APackage%27s Suggests field is empty.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#913365: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] ..silly wee typo in reportbug-ng --help output)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #913365,
regarding [reportbug-ng] ..silly wee typo in reportbug-ng --help output
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
913365: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=913365
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: minor

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

..silly wee typo in reportbug-ng --help output:
reportbug-ng --help
Usage: reportbug-ng [Options] [Query]

Report a bug in Debian's BTS. The optional paremter QUERY behaves
   
   paremter should have been parameter 
   
Report a bug in Debian's BTS. The optional parameter QUERY behaves
exactly like the query inside the program. Supported queries are:
packagename, bugnumber, maintai...@foo.bar, src:package,
from:submit...@foo.bar, severity:foo and tag:bar.

Options:
  --version show program's version number and exit
  -h, --helpshow this help message and exit
  -l LEVEL, --loglevel=LEVEL
Which loglevel to use [default: warning]. Valid
loglevels are: critical, error, warning, info,
debug, notset


--- System information. ---
Architecture: 
Kernel:   Linux 4.18.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64

Debian Release: 9
  500 stable-updates  deb.devuan.org 
  500 stable-security deb.devuan.org 
  500 stable  deb.devuan.org 
  100 stable-proposed-updates deb.devuan.org 
  100 stable-backports deb.devuan.org 
  100 experimentaldeb.devuan.org 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-==
python:any(>= 2.7.5-5~) | 
python-debianbts   (>= 1.0) | 2.6.1
python-pyqt5| 5.7+dfsg-5
python-pyqt5.qtwebkit   | 5.7+dfsg-5
xdg-utils   | 1.1.1-1+deb9u1
xterm   | 327-2
python-apt  (>= 0.7.93) | 1.4.0~beta3


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.




Hi,


-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#833935: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Crash on bad connection)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #833935,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Crash on bad connection
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
833935: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=833935
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: normal

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---

I wanted to report a bug while simultanously downloading something from
a high-bandwidth server. After typing "icedove" into the query field and
hitting enter, reportbug-ng hang for a while, and then crashed. Console
output:

philipp@notebook4:~$ reportbug-ng
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/share/reportbug-ng/rnggui.py", line 210, in
lineedit_return_pressed
bl = bts.get_status(chunk)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/debianbts.py", line 210, in
get_status
reply = server.get_status(list_[i:i+BATCH_SIZE])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 545, in
__call__
return self.__r_call(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 567, in
__r_call
self.__hd, self.__ma)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 430, in
__call
timeout = self.timeout)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/SOAPpy/Client.py", line 286, in
call
raise HTTPError(code, "Empty response from server\nCode:
%s\nHeaders: %s" % (msg, headers))
SOAPpy.Errors.HTTPError: 
Abgebrochen

--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel:   Linux 4.6.0-1-amd64

Debian Release: stretch/sid
  500 unstableftp.de.debian.org   500 testing
ftp.de.debian.org 1 experimentalftp.de.debian.org
--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-==
python:any(>= 2.7.5-5~) | python-debianbts
(>= 1.0) | 1.14
python-pyqt5| 5.6+dfsg-1+b1
python-pyqt5.qtwebkit   | 5.6+dfsg-1+b1
xdg-utils   | 1.1.1-1
xterm   | 325-1
python-apt  (>= 0.7.93) | 1.1.0~beta4


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#834104: marked as done (reportbug-ng: Uses obsolete dpkg --print-installation-architecture)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #834104,
regarding reportbug-ng: Uses obsolete dpkg --print-installation-architecture
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
834104: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834104
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: normal

Hi!

This package is using the following command to get system information
«dpkg --print-installation-architecture 2>/dev/null», and quiescing
the dpkg invocation which supresses the warning mentioning that the
command is obsolete. Please switch to use the --print-architecture
command because the other is targetted for removal.

Thanks,
Guillem
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#866143: marked as done ([reportbug-ng] Unable to select Thunderbird as mail client)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #866143,
regarding [reportbug-ng] Unable to select Thunderbird as mail client
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
866143: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=866143
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: important

--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
I am using Thunderbird as the mail client. But I am unable to select
Thunderbird as mail client in reportbug-ng. It is only showing options
Evolution and Mutt as options.

--- System information. ---
Architecture: 
Kernel:   Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64

Debian Release: 9.0
  500 xenial  ppa.launchpad.net 
  500 unstabledebian.sil.at 
  500 stable  debian.sil.at 
1 experimentaldebian.sil.at 

--- Package information. ---
Depends   (Version) | Installed
===-+-==
python:any(>= 2.7.5-5~) | 
python-debianbts   (>= 1.0) | 2.6.1
python-pyqt5| 5.7+dfsg-5
python-pyqt5.qtwebkit   | 5.7+dfsg-5
xdg-utils   | 1.1.1-1
xterm   | 327-2
python-apt  (>= 0.7.93) | 1.4.0~beta3


Package's Recommends field is empty.

Package's Suggests field is empty.


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#853186: marked as done (reportbug-ng should not depend on any installed mail transport agent (MTA))

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #853186,
regarding reportbug-ng should not depend on any installed mail transport agent 
(MTA)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
853186: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853186
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: wishlist


Hello!

Reportbug-ng does NEED an installed MTA, while reportbug (the old console tool) 
does NOT. 

I do NOT WANT any MTA installed on my system. For reporting bugs i use 
reportbug-ng as tool to search the bug database, but afterwards 
i am using the old reportbug program, just because it does not need any 
installed MTA. 

Since the commandline reportbug can do without any MTA, why not make 
reportbug-ng the same?

Thanks for listening,
Bert



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 9.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python-apt 1.1.0~beta5
ii  python-debianbts   2.6.1
ii  python-pyqt5   5.7+dfsg-4
ii  python-pyqt5.qtwebkit  5.7+dfsg-4
pn  python:any 
ii  xdg-utils  1.1.1-1
ii  xterm  327-2

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#919168: marked as done (Please update to python3-debianbts)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #919168,
regarding Please update to python3-debianbts
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
919168: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919168
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.2
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

Python2 support is being removed from the upstream package python-debianbts.
After buster, I'll drop Python2 support from the Debian package as well. Please
consider updating to python3-debianbts.


Cheers,

Bastian

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), 
LANGUAGE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages reportbug-ng depends on:
ii  python 2.7.15-3
ii  python-apt 1.7.0
ii  python-debianbts   2.8.2
ii  python-pyqt5   5.11.3+dfsg-1+b3
ii  python-pyqt5.qtwebkit  5.11.3+dfsg-1+b3
ii  xdg-utils  1.1.3-1
ii  xterm  342-1

reportbug-ng recommends no packages.

reportbug-ng suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#867174: marked as done (reportbug-ng: incorrect work with kmail)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Fri, 15 Feb 2019 20:55:13 +
with message-id 
and subject line Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #867174,
regarding reportbug-ng: incorrect work with kmail
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
867174: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=867174
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug-ng
Version: 2.1
Severity: normal

Hi,

Reportbug NG sends URL-encoded text to KMail (see attachment).

Best regards,
Boris
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.2+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package reportbug-ng has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/922382

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)--- End Message ---

Bug#922382: Removed package(s) from unstable

[Debian FTP Masters]

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following
package(s) have been removed from unstable:

reportbug-ng |2.2 | source, all

--- Reason ---
ROM; not maintained by me for long time
--

Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag
database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug.
The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite
references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references
it).  Please also remember that the changes have been done on the
master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next
dinstall run at the earliest.

Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks
unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed
from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency
problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is
really needed, please contact them if this should be the case.

We try to close bugs which have been reported against this package
automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they were closed
correctly or should have been re-assigned to another package.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 922...@bugs.debian.org.

The full log for this bug can be viewed at https://bugs.debian.org/922382

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

simulavr is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

simulavr 1.0.0+git20160221.e53413b-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 
2019-03-25

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
921775: avr-libc: FTBFS (LaTeX error)

autofs is marked for autoremoval from testing

[Debian testing autoremoval watch]

autofs 5.1.2-4 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-03-24

It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
921761: sssd: FTBFS (failing tests)