Processing of python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2_amd64.changes
python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2.dsc python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2.diff.gz python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spsfn-0006ux...@franck.debian.org
Processing of python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2_amd64.changes
python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2.dsc python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2.diff.gz python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spsfn-0006ud...@franck.debian.org
Processing of xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.changes
xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: xloadimage_4.1-19.dsc xloadimage_4.1-19.debian.tar.gz xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spspu-0008ti...@franck.debian.org
python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2.diff.gz to main/p/python-repoze.what/python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2.diff.gz python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2.dsc to main/p/python-repoze.what/python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2.dsc python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2_all.deb to main/p/python-repoze.what/python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2_all.deb Changes: python-repoze.what (1.0.9-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Orphan package. Override entries for your package: python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2.dsc - source python python-repoze.what_1.0.9-2_all.deb - optional python Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spstg-0001uc...@franck.debian.org
python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2.diff.gz to main/p/python-repoze.who/python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2.diff.gz python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2.dsc to main/p/python-repoze.who/python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2.dsc python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2_all.deb to main/p/python-repoze.who/python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2_all.deb Changes: python-repoze.who (1.0.18-2) unstable; urgency=low . * Orphan package Override entries for your package: python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2.dsc - source python python-repoze.who_1.0.18-2_all.deb - optional python Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spsta-0001az...@franck.debian.org
xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: xloadimage_4.1-19.debian.tar.gz to main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-19.debian.tar.gz xloadimage_4.1-19.dsc to main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-19.dsc xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.deb to main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.deb Changes: xloadimage (4.1-19) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Adjust hardening flags to include LDFLAGS for uufilter (Closes: #670819). Thanks to Simon Ruderich . Override entries for your package: xloadimage_4.1-19.dsc - source graphics xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.deb - optional graphics Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 670819 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1spsuc-0001ln...@franck.debian.org
Bug#670819: marked as done (xloadimage: Hardening flags missing)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 10:05:00 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#670819: fixed in xloadimage 4.1-19
has caused the Debian Bug report #670819,
regarding xloadimage: Hardening flags missing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
670819: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=670819
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xloadimage
Version: 4.1-18
Severity: important
Tags: Patch
Dear Maintainer,
The hardening flags are missing because the build system ignores
them. For more hardening information please have a look at [1],
[2] and [3].
The attached patch fixes the issue.
To check if all flags were correctly enabled you can use
`hardening-check` from the hardening-includes package and check
the build log (for example with blhc [4]) (hardening-check
doesn't catch everything):
$ hardening-check /usr/bin/uufilter /usr/bin/xloadimage
/usr/bin/uufilter:
Position Independent Executable: yes
Stack protected: no, not found!
Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found)
Read-only relocations: yes
Immediate binding: yes
/usr/bin/xloadimage:
Position Independent Executable: yes
Stack protected: yes
Fortify Source functions: yes (some protected functions found)
Read-only relocations: yes
Immediate binding: yes
(Position Independent Executable and Immediate binding is not
enabled by default.)
Use find -type f \( -executable -o -name \*.so\* \) -exec
hardening-check {} + on the build result to check all files.
Regards,
Simon
[1]: https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags
[2]: https://wiki.debian.org/HardeningWalkthrough
[3]: https://wiki.debian.org/Hardening
[4]: http://ruderich.org/simon/blhc/
--
+ privacy is necessary
+ using gnupg http://gnupg.org
+ public key id: 0x92FEFDB7E44C32F9
Description: Use build flags from environment (dpkg-buildflags).
Necessary for hardening flags.
Author: Simon Ruderich
Last-Update: 2012-04-29
Index: xloadimage-4.1/Makefile.in
===
--- xloadimage-4.1.orig/Makefile.in 2012-04-29 12:13:45.456985928 +0200
+++ xloadimage-4.1/Makefile.in 2012-04-29 12:13:45.640985927 +0200
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
$(CC) -o $@ $(OBJS) build.o $(LDFLAGS) $(XLIB) $(LIBS)
uufilter: uufilter.c
- $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(DEFS) uufilter.c -o $@
+ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) $(DEFS) uufilter.c -o $@
.c.o: config.h image.h
$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $(DEFS) $<
Index: xloadimage-4.1/Makefile.std
===
--- xloadimage-4.1.orig/Makefile.std 2012-04-29 12:13:41.916985912 +0200
+++ xloadimage-4.1/Makefile.std 2012-04-29 12:13:45.640985927 +0200
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
# the Make.conf file and recursively calls make.
autoconfig: autoconfig.c
- $(CC) -g -o autoconfig autoconfig.c
+ $(CC) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -g -o autoconfig autoconfig.c
# manual configuration target
configure:: autoconfig
Index: xloadimage-4.1/Makefile
===
--- xloadimage-4.1.orig/Makefile 2012-04-29 12:13:41.916985912 +0200
+++ xloadimage-4.1/Makefile 2012-04-29 12:13:45.640985927 +0200
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
# Include system configuration parameters
include Make.conf
-CFLAGS=$(OPT_FLAGS) $(CC_FLAGS) $(CC_CONFIG_FLAGS) $(X11_INC_DIR) \
+CFLAGS+=$(OPT_FLAGS) $(CC_FLAGS) $(CC_CONFIG_FLAGS) $(X11_INC_DIR) \
-DSYSPATHFILE=\"$(SYSPATHFILE)\"
LIBS=$(X11_LIB_DIR) $(X11_LIB_NAME) $(SYS_LIBS) -lm
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
# the Make.conf file and recursively calls make.
autoconfig: autoconfig.c
- $(CC) -g -o autoconfig autoconfig.c
+ $(CC) $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -g -o autoconfig autoconfig.c
# manual configuration target
configure:: autoconfig
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: xloadimage
Source-Version: 4.1-19
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xloadimage, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xloadimage_4.1-19.debian.tar.gz
to main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-19.debian.tar.gz
xloadimage_4.1-19.dsc
to main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-19.dsc
xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.deb
to main/x/xloadimage/xloadimage_4.1-19_amd64.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 670...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bu
Bug#671384: xplc: FTBFS on hurd-i386.
Package: xplc
Severity: important
Tags: upstream patch
Dear Maintainer,
xplc currently FTBFS on hurd-i386 because it uses the PATH_MAX macro, which is
not defined on GNU/Hurd. The attached patch should fix this issue. Since
PATH_MAX is not needed any more, it also removes the check for limits.h from
configure.ac.
WBR,
Cyril Roelandt.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unreleased
APT policy: (500, 'unreleased'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: hurd-i386 (i686-AT386)
Kernel: GNU-Mach 1.3.99/Hurd-0.3
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=locale: Cannot set
LC_CTYPE to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale: No such file or directory
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- xplc-0.3.13.orig/xplc/modulemgr.cpp 2004-09-30 21:09:54.0 +
+++ xplc-0.3.13/xplc/modulemgr.cpp 2012-05-03 16:28:28.0 +
@@ -29,9 +29,6 @@
#ifdef HAVE_STDINT_H
# include
#endif
-#ifdef HAVE_LIMITS_H
-# include
-#endif
#if !defined(WIN32)
# if HAVE_DIRENT_H
@@ -83,7 +80,7 @@
#if !defined(WIN32)
DIR* dir;
struct dirent* ent;
- char fname[PATH_MAX];
+ char *fname;
IServiceManager* servmgr = XPLC_getServiceManager();
IModuleLoader* loader;
ModuleNode* modules = 0;
@@ -106,7 +103,10 @@
while((ent = readdir(dir))) {
IModule* module;
-snprintf(fname, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", directory, ent->d_name);
+size_t size;
+size = snprintf(NULL, 0, "%s/%s", directory, ent->d_name) + 1;
+fname = new char[size];
+snprintf(fname, size, "%s/%s", directory, ent->d_name);
module = loader->loadModule(fname);
if(module) {
@@ -115,6 +115,8 @@
if(node)
modules = node;
}
+
+delete [] fname;
}
loader->release();
--- xplc-0.3.13.orig/configure.ac 2005-10-31 23:19:35.0 +
+++ xplc-0.3.13/configure.ac 2012-05-03 16:27:06.0 +
@@ -83,7 +83,6 @@
AC_PROG_LN_S
AC_HEADER_DIRENT
-AC_CHECK_HEADERS([limits.h])
AC_CHECK_PROGS([CVS2CL], [cvs2cl.pl cvs2cl], [no])
--- xplc-0.3.13.orig/include/autoconf.h.in 2005-10-31 22:50:02.0 +
+++ xplc-0.3.13/include/autoconf.h.in 2012-05-03 16:28:50.0 +
@@ -13,9 +13,6 @@
/* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */
#undef HAVE_INTTYPES_H
-/* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */
-#undef HAVE_LIMITS_H
-
/* Define to 1 if you have the header file. */
#undef HAVE_MACH_O_DYLD_H
Bug#126314: marked as done (defoma crash during package install?)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #126314, regarding defoma crash during package install? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 126314: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=126314 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gs-common Version: 0.3.1 I am using the FAI package to install Debian on machines automatically. When I try to install gs-common, I get the following message: --- /sbin/install_packages: read config file /fai/package_config/WINLIKE_DEBUG chroot /tmp/target apt-get -y --fix-missing install gs-common mtools Reading Package Lists... Building Dependency Tree... The following extra packages will be installed: defoma dialog file perl perl-modules zlib1g The following NEW packages will be installed: defoma dialog file gs-common mtools perl perl-modules zlib1g Preconfiguring packages ... 0 packages upgraded, 8 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2991kB of archives. After unpacking 13.2MB will be used. [snip] Setting up defoma (0.9.1) ... Setting up gs-common (0.3.1) ... Out of memory! Callback called exit at /usr/bin/defoma-subst line 22. /var/lib/dpkg/info/gs-common.postinst: line 86: 496 Killed de foma-subst check-rule ghostscript Out of memory! Callback called exit at /usr/bin/defoma-subst line 22. END failed--call queue aborted at /usr/bin/defoma-subst line 3. Callback called exit at /usr/bin/defoma-subst line 3. END failed--call queue aborted at /usr/bin/defoma-subst line 11. Callback called exit at /usr/bin/defoma-subst line 11. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/defoma-subst line 22. dpkg: error processing gs-common (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 12 Errors were encountered while processing: gs-common E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) ERROR: 25600 25600 --- This happens no matter what other packages I install along with gs-common. Line 22 of defoma-subst seems to be use Debian::Defoma::Font; I am installing this onto a Pentium 90 with 16MB of RAM. I would think that meets minimum Debian requirements. This is a fairly serious error for me because it FAI's installation process grinds to a halt upon encountering an error, which means that other packages following gs-common in the list do not get installed. - Paul --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#145963: marked as done (dfontmgr: some bugs on adding font)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #145963, regarding dfontmgr: some bugs on adding font to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 145963: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=145963 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dfontmgr Version: 0.11.0 Severity: normal Hi, I found some strange when I tried to add TrueType font. 1. I tried to add font 'DFHeiC.ttc' and I didn't want using sample(/usr/share/doc/defoma/examples), so I answer 'No' to use sample. But dfontmgr shows me example file. I tried 'Yes' and 'No' on the question, both are same. This looks routine bug. 2. I canceled during configuration, but hints junk file is remained. I can't do adding operation again without removing this junk file (No error was shown). -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux hellhound 2.4.17 #1 15:43:25 JST i686 unknown Versions of the packages dfontmgr depends on: ii defoma 0.11.0 Debian Font Manager -- automatic font config ii libglade-perl 0.59-2 Glade-perl runtime modules ii libgtk-perl0.7008-1.2 Perl module for the gtk+ library ii perl 5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#143818: marked as done (gs-common: VERY slow with many truetype fonts)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #143818, regarding gs-common: VERY slow with many truetype fonts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 143818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=143818 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gs-common Version: 0.3.3 Severity: normal I made my ttf-larabie-* font packages defoma-compatible. gs-common is _very_ slow on them... Installing abiword-common, libpango1.0-common, x-ttcidfont-conf just take about 15-40 seconds each. installation of gs-common has been taking several minutes now. it takes about one hour i think, making this package mostly unuseable in combination with my font packages (on my 933 MHz!!). output from "apt-get install gs-common" [...] Unpacking Ersatz-gs-common ... Setting up gs-common (0.3.3) ... Updating font configuration of gs... Cleaning up category psprint.. Cleaning up category cmap.. Cleaning up category cid.. Cleaning up category truetype.. Cleaning up category gsfontderivative.. Cleaning up category type3.. Cleaning up category type1.. Updating category type1.. Updating category type3.. Updating category gsfontderivative.. Updating category truetype.. [... sitting here for several minutes now, at 100% CPU ...] there definitely is progess: $ ls /var/lib/defoma/gs.d/dirs/fonts | wc -l 172 a few seconds later: 181 so the script is chewing through the ttf fonts slowly. But what is it doing??? All i can see there are symlinks being created... I've not yet uploaded my new ttf-larabie-packages yet, in order i don't get many bugs reported against my packages... but you can get them from http://people.debian.org/~erich/ttf-larabie/ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux marvin.xmldesign.de 2.4.19-pre6acpi0404 #1 Mon Apr 8 00:26:54 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro Versions of packages gs-common depends on: ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 1.16 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii defoma0.11.0 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ii gs6.53-3 The Ghostscript Postscript interpr ii gsfonts 6.0-2 Fonts for the ghostscript interpre --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#134593: marked as done (Handling of spaces in font names)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #134593, regarding Handling of spaces in font names to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 134593: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=134593 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.10.1 Severity: wishlist I believe it's important that defoma (I'm filing this bug for defoma because it's a framework wide issue) correctly handles font names with spaces in them. This is most important for X, where applications such as web browsers frequently have to request those fonts (e.g. Comic Sans, Bookman Old Style etc.). This is also the only thing that currently makes using defoma as the universal font manager uncomfortable for me. The current workaround of defoma-hint, replacing the spaces with dots, is unsatisfactory because one has to manually add alias entries to his X configuration, which is exactly what defoma is supposed to get rid of. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#179099: marked as done (defoma-font memory leak)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #143818, regarding defoma-font memory leak to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 143818: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=143818 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1 Severity: important When using defoma-font register-all on a large ttf hintfile (the ttf-larabie defoma-aware packages at people.debian.org/~erich) it takes many hours to run and memory consumption gradually climbs. (I swapped out and crashed at 140M process mem on this crappy P-MMX.) Maybe register-all should restart itself for each font in the hintfile. --mark-- -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux snortle.scruzbox.com 2.4.19 #1 SMP Wed Dec 18 01:37:57 PST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20020814-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 3.39-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.6.1-8.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#145970: marked as done (dfontmgr: recommended answer is 'NO', but default choice is 'YES' )
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #145970, regarding dfontmgr: recommended answer is 'NO', but default choice is 'YES' to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 145970: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=145970 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: dfontmgr Version: 0.11.0 Severity: wishlist When adding TrueType font file has multiple face, dfontmgr asks use them all(YES) or first one(NO). Help message says 'recommended answer is 'NO'', but default choice of this question is 'YES'. I think this default choice must be 'NO'. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux hellhound 2.4.17 15:43:25 JST i686 unknown Versions of the packages dfontmgr depends on: ii defoma 0.11.0 Debian Font Manager -- automatic font config ii libglade-perl 0.59-2 Glade-perl runtime modules ii libgtk-perl0.7008-1.2 Perl module for the gtk+ library ii perl 5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#157801: marked as done (defoma: Can't find in docs: How to un-fail fonts, how to set up XF86Config)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #157801, regarding defoma: Can't find in docs: How to un-fail fonts, how to set up XF86Config to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 157801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157801 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1 Severity: normal Some fonts failed to register during installation. The error message suggests that I should unmark them as failed. But it doesn't say how to do this. And the docs don't say. I also can't find any explanation of how to use defoma's font information to set up XF86Config to use all defoma'd fonts in X. I also can't find any general design docs. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Kernel Version: Linux tytlal 2.4.19rc5aa1 #1 Fri Aug 2 16:06:17 EDT 2002 i686 unknown unknown GNU/Linux Versions of the packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20020519- Displays user-friendly dialog boxes from she ii file 3.37-3.1 Determines file type using "magic" numbers ii perl 5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#158668: marked as done (defoma: defoma-hints doesn't allow multiple aliases)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #158668, regarding defoma: defoma-hints doesn't allow multiple aliases to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 158668: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=158668 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.0 Severity: normal I start up defoma-hints on a TrueType font. It starts as a graphical app (if that makes a difference). After a lot of clicking through dialogs I get to the screen where it asks me to enter aliases for the font, and suggests if I have more than one alias I can enter them separated by spaces. If I enter one alias it works fine. If I enter more than one alias separated by a space, I get an error telling me that " " is an invalid character in a font name and I can replace it with an underscore. Then I'm locked in this dialog: clicking OK just gets me back to the error dialog and clicking Cancel exits defoma-hints altogether. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux lemming 2.4.9-34custom #1 Wed Aug 7 12:02:05 EDT 2002 i686 unknown Versions of the packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9a-20020309a Displays user-friendly dialog boxes from she ii file 3.37-3.1 Determines file type using "magic" numbers ii perl 5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and Report --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#157899: marked as done (defoma-user: missing manpage)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #157899, regarding defoma-user: missing manpage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 157899: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157899 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/defoma-user -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 #include - -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.16 #2 SMP Wed Nov 28 05:25:00 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20020519-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 3.37-3.1Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.6.1-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9ZYl++z+IwlXqWf4RAppIAJ9HDyV2YhY7QjcuXZcpwTktSSo4ZgCfSs6c xUuZWO3MtdBIJZJ/yOm8yh4= =bKAP -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#360823: marked as done ("I have no idea what defoma-user does")
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #157899, regarding "I have no idea what defoma-user does" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 157899: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157899 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.8-0.1 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/share/man/man1/defoma-user.1.gz man defoma-user says "I have no idea what defoma-user does" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#179099: marked as done (defoma-font memory leak)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #179099, regarding defoma-font memory leak to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 179099: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179099 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1 Severity: important When using defoma-font register-all on a large ttf hintfile (the ttf-larabie defoma-aware packages at people.debian.org/~erich) it takes many hours to run and memory consumption gradually climbs. (I swapped out and crashed at 140M process mem on this crappy P-MMX.) Maybe register-all should restart itself for each font in the hintfile. --mark-- -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux snortle.scruzbox.com 2.4.19 #1 SMP Wed Dec 18 01:37:57 PST 2002 i586 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20020814-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 3.39-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.6.1-8.2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#159719: marked as done (defoma - adding fonts is too complex)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #159719, regarding defoma - adding fonts is too complex to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 159719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=159719 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1 Just some wishlist items: Adding fonts to defoma is too complex! There are too many questions to be answered for each font. And how do I know whether the general family is "Mincho" or ... ? I've hundreds of Type 1 and truetype fonts that I would like to make available via defoma, but it's just too difficult. It would be nice to point to the directory of type 1 or truetype font files and just say "here they are, do it", or whatever. If having hundreds of fonts installed takes up too many resources, it would be nice to have a simple way of repeatedly installing and uninstalling groups of fonts. Converting them to packages and using apt-get install or remove as root would be too difficult. Question: Installing a font via defoma doesn't make it available to xfs; why isn't xfs registered with defoma? Thanks for listening, Bruce L. __ Bruce LaZerte Grandview Lake in Muskoka Baysville, Ontario, Canada --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#143818: marked as done (gs-common: VERY slow with many truetype fonts)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #179099, regarding gs-common: VERY slow with many truetype fonts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 179099: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179099 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: gs-common Version: 0.3.3 Severity: normal I made my ttf-larabie-* font packages defoma-compatible. gs-common is _very_ slow on them... Installing abiword-common, libpango1.0-common, x-ttcidfont-conf just take about 15-40 seconds each. installation of gs-common has been taking several minutes now. it takes about one hour i think, making this package mostly unuseable in combination with my font packages (on my 933 MHz!!). output from "apt-get install gs-common" [...] Unpacking Ersatz-gs-common ... Setting up gs-common (0.3.3) ... Updating font configuration of gs... Cleaning up category psprint.. Cleaning up category cmap.. Cleaning up category cid.. Cleaning up category truetype.. Cleaning up category gsfontderivative.. Cleaning up category type3.. Cleaning up category type1.. Updating category type1.. Updating category type3.. Updating category gsfontderivative.. Updating category truetype.. [... sitting here for several minutes now, at 100% CPU ...] there definitely is progess: $ ls /var/lib/defoma/gs.d/dirs/fonts | wc -l 172 a few seconds later: 181 so the script is chewing through the ttf fonts slowly. But what is it doing??? All i can see there are symlinks being created... I've not yet uploaded my new ttf-larabie-packages yet, in order i don't get many bugs reported against my packages... but you can get them from http://people.debian.org/~erich/ttf-larabie/ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux marvin.xmldesign.de 2.4.19-pre6acpi0404 #1 Mon Apr 8 00:26:54 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro Versions of packages gs-common depends on: ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy ii debianutils 1.16 Miscellaneous utilities specific t ii defoma0.11.0 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ii gs6.53-3 The Ghostscript Postscript interpr ii gsfonts 6.0-2 Fonts for the ghostscript interpre --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#217260: marked as done (defoma: Font alias in Chinese accepted, but causes fontconfig runtime error)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #217260, regarding defoma: Font alias in Chinese accepted, but causes fontconfig runtime error to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 217260: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217260 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.5 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux tea 2.4.21-ow2 #6 SMP 三 10月 22 12:14:24 EDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20031002-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.06-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.1-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.51.4-18 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe -- no debconf information When a TrueType font is added using defoma, I can type in alias names in Chinese (which defoma accepts). However, during runtime, defoma will generate errors (warnings?) in the form Fontconfig error: "/var/lib/defoma/fontconfig.d/fonts.conf", line 43: not well-formed (invalid token) When I open the fonts.conf file and check the line in question, I find that the line just contains the Chinese font name between and . Note that the Chinese font name is encoded in the charset specified by the locale (in this case Big5) instead of in UTF-8, which is probably why fontconfig thinks the line is not well-formed. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#170557: marked as done (defoma-hints and truetype)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #170557, regarding defoma-hints and truetype to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 170557: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=170557 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1 Severity: normal Tags: sid when using defoma-hints --no-question on a truetype font defoma writes the Family with dots and it prevents xfree from displaying the font properly for exemple : Family = Abadi.MT.Condensed.Light should be Abadi_MT_Condensed_Light or Abadi MT Condensed Light as it is in the fonts.dir also defoma does not guess all the Charsets -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zeus 2.4.19 #1 Tue Oct 29 16:57:42 CET 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20020814-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 3.39-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.0-14Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#221887: marked as done (better error reporting from application scripts)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #221887, regarding better error reporting from application scripts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 221887: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=221887 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.5 Severity: important Defoma silently failed to register fonts for ghostscript because /var/lib/defoma/gs.d/dirs/fonts did not exist. The main problem was, that the failure was silent. Not a single word was printed anywhere until I did: defoma-font unregister-all ...gs.hints defoma-font -v register-all ...gs.hints Then defoma replied with lot of messages like this: /usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/z003034l.pfb: failed to register for package gs, status(3). errno 3 => No such process It does not seem to mean errno and does not seem to be helpful at all. And even this is only printed with the -v option. The magic I needed to cast to solve the problem (including strace to see what directory the fonts should have been in) can't be expected of normal user. Please, make defoma create directories it needs if they don't exist or at least make it complain loudly on such an error, preferably with helpful message and in a way that crashes post-install script of package registering fonts, so user knows that something went wrong. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux vagabond 2.4.22 #2 Ne zář 21 17:37:55 CEST 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=cs_CZ Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20031002-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.06-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.2-2 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.51.4-18 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe -- no debconf information --- Jan 'Bulb' Hudec --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#217651: marked as done (defoma does not register Type1 fonts to X server or font server)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #217651, regarding defoma does not register Type1 fonts to X server or font server to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 217651: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217651 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.5 I installed defoma, psfontmgr, and gsfonts. but defoma doesn't create fonts.dir for gsfonts to use with X windows. I can't find any directory containing links to *.pfb fonts and corresponding fonts.dir files under /var/lib/defoma. However x-ttcidfont-conf does create *.ttf symlinks and fonts.dir file. So I can't register Type1 fonts to X server unless I install non-defoma font.scale file under /etc/X11/fonts/Type1. 네띠앙 프리미엄 메일 오픈! (SMTP, 스팸메일 필터링 제공) http://www.netian.com/premium_mail/main.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#224362: marked as done (Errors on msttcorefonts uninstall about defoma and other)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #224362, regarding Errors on msttcorefonts uninstall about defoma and other to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 224362: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=224362 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: msttcorefonts Version: 1.1.3 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux rebecca 2.6.0-test11 #1 Thu Dec 11 17:11:06 CET 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro Versions of packages msttcorefonts depends on: ii cabextract0.6-1 a program to extract Microsoft Cab ii debconf 1.3.22 Debian configuration management sy ii defoma0.11.5 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ii wget 1.9.1-3retrieves files from the web ii xutils4.2.1-14 X Window System utility programs -- debconf information: * msttcorefonts/defoma: msttcorefonts/savedir: msttcorefonts/baddldir: * msttcorefonts/dldir: /root * msttcorefonts/blurb: When I uninstall msttcorefonts I get some errors, then i was unable to use epiphany-browser. I have already make a bug for epiphany-browser and the mantainer suggest to open a new bug for msttcorefonts. This is the error when I uninstall the package, if you nees more information let me know! Bye Carlo apt-get remove --purge msttcorefonts Lettura della lista dei pacchetti in corso... Fatto Generazione dell'albero delle dipendenze in corso... Fatto I seguenti pacchetti saranno RIMOSSI: msttcorefonts* 0 aggiornati, 0 installati, 1 da rimuovere e 1 non aggiornati. È necessario prendere 0B di archivi. Dopo l'estrazione, verranno liberati 87,0kB di spazio su disco. Continuare? [S/n] s (Lettura del database ... 116789 file e directory attualmente installati.) Rimozione di msttcorefonts ... Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 54, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 54, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 56, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 56, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 56, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 54, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 54, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 56, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 56, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 56, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/Fon tCache.pm line 42, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in print at /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/IO/Handle.pm line 147 . Use of uninitialized value in print at /usr/lib/perl/5.8.2/IO/Handle.pm line 147 . Use of uni
Bug#239482: marked as done (msttcorefonts: Cannot purge msttcorefonts)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #239482, regarding msttcorefonts: Cannot purge msttcorefonts to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 239482: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=239482 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: msttcorefonts Version: 1.1.2 Severity: normal Trying to remove msttcorefonts: zero:~$ sudo dpkg --purge msttcorefonts (Reading database ... 67435 files and directories currently installed.) Removing msttcorefonts ... W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana_Bold_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Bold.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana_Bold.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Bold_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Webdings.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Comic_Sans_MS.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New_Bold.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Black.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Comic_Sans_MS_Bold.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New_Bold_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Impact.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Verdana.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia_Bold.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial_Bold.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Courier_New_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman_Bold.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Arial.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Andale_Mono.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Georgia_Bold_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Bold_Italic.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS.ttf: not registered. W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Times_New_Roman_Bold_Italic.ttf: not registered. dpkg: error processing msttcorefonts (--purge): subprocess pre-removal script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: msttcorefonts And I'm stuck. I tried installing 1.1.3, which worked, but then trying to purge it failed. This came up in the middle of a woody->sarge upgrade, in which I was also removing all the X stuff from the box, so it's quite possible something got removed earlier that mssttcorefonts needs, but this indicates a missing dependency or somesuch. Thanks, Steve -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux zero 2.4.18-686 #2 Wed Mar 20 20:21:31 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages msttcorefonts depends on: ii cabextract0.2-2 a program to extract Microsoft Cab ii debconf 1.4.16 Debian configuration management sy pi defoma0.11.0 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f ii wget 1.8.2-8retrieves files from the web ii xutils4.1.0-16woody1 X Window System utility programs --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#231616: marked as done (defoma-hints error in libperl-hint.pl)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #231616, regarding defoma-hints error in libperl-hint.pl to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 231616: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=231616 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.7 Severity: normal Tags: sid I am trying generate a hint file for a truetype font, using defoma-hints, but aparently, a error in perl script is hinders its correct functioning. As I do not know perl, I do not know what to make. Example of the error occurring: defoma-hints -c truetype /usr/share/fonts/truetype/tahoma.ttf after the command, the following error message is shown indefinitely: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at /usr/share/defoma/libperl-hint.pl line 43 -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.2 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (ignored: LC_ALL set to pt_BR) Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20031207-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.07-2 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.3-1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.51.4-19 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#269264: marked as done (defoma: Unlabelled dialog box is confusing)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #269264, regarding defoma: Unlabelled dialog box is confusing to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 269264: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=269264 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.8-0.1 Severity: normal When I try to generate hints for a set of TrueType fonts, I got past 2 screens and then a third dialog with only a list of font names but without a meaningful label, or instructions on what the list is or what I should do: # defoma-hints truetype hk*.ttf > hakusyu.hints Wait for second... [first screen elided...] [second screen elided...] HintsGenerator HakusyuGyosyoKyokan vLf.eYo. HakusyuGyosyoKyokan-Regular The user would not know what "HintsGenerator" means, or what should be selected at this point. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-ow1 Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5 Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.0-20040731-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.10-3 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.4-2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.51.6-12 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#315682: marked as done (defoma-ps should generate Location and FontName hints)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #315682, regarding defoma-ps should generate Location and FontName hints to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 315682: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315682 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.8-0.1 Severity: important In the ch3.html file in /usr/share/doc/defoma-doc/defoma-script.html, it says: On register command, the hints must be parsed to pick out Location and FontName hints. parse_hints_start() is used for this purpose. This function converts hints stored in an array to a hash. For more detail, please refer the manpage of Defoma::Common. If these necessary HintTypes, Location and FontName are not found, the script returns non-zero to tell defoma that the script failed to register the font. However, many of the hintfiles installed automatically have no Location entries, and some even lack FontName. In particular, the defoma-ps.hints file installed by /usr/bin/defoma-psfont-installer from a PPD file has neither FontName nor Location entries. I had to add Location manually to gsfonts.hints, gsfonts-other.hints, and scalable-cyrfonts.hints. I also see that xfree86-nonfree-type1.hints lacks Location lines. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.18-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.0-20050306-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.12-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.51.6-20 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#256500: marked as done ("Phantom" helvetica font with invisible letters)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #256500, regarding "Phantom" helvetica font with invisible letters to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 256500: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=256500 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.8 Severity: normal Hi, I'm not sure what package to file this bug against; 'defoma' is a shot in the dark. The problem is that in some X applications, e.g. 'gv' or 'amaya', some text elements are not being displayed - for example, the menus. All the menu items are there and they are selectable, but the letters are invisible. Unfortunately, I know of no way to find out what X font an application is requesting from the server, so more guesswork was involved. After a while, however, I found that -*-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-*-100-* contains only 'empty characters'. If I select this font in e.g. xftontsel, the sample text disappears. The strange thing is that the only foundry that has this font is adobe, and when I select -adobe-helvetica-medium-r-normal-*-*-100-*, the display is correct. It seems to be the ptSz value that does the voodoo: as long as I don't touch it, the letters are there. I made this little table about which value works and which doesn't: -*- OK -80-bad -90-OK -100- bad -120- bad -140- bad -180- bad -240- bad I have the following packages installed that may be related to the problem: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ NameVersionDescription +++-===-==-== ii dafont-basic-fixedwidth 1.00-1 Dafont Basic Fixed Width fonts package. ii defoma 0.11.8 Debian Font Manager -- automatic font configuration framework ii dfontmgr0.11.7 GUI frontend for Defoma, DEbian FOnt MAnager ii dvi2ps-fontdata-bsr 1.0.1-0.1 tfm files for bluesky research fonts ii dynafont1.0-15 Module for konwert package which loads UTF-8 fonts dynamically ii figfonts2.2.1-1User contributed fonts for figlet ii fontconfig 2.2.2-2generic font configuration library ii freefont0.10-11Freeware font selection for X11 ii gsfonts 8.14-3 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpreter(s) ii gsfonts-other 6.0-3 Additional fonts for the ghostscript interpreter ii gsfonts-x11 0.17 Make Ghostscript fonts available to X11 ii gtkfontsel 1.1-6 A gtk+ based font selection utility ii latex-xft-fonts 0.1-3 Xft-compatible versions of some LaTeX fonts ii libfont-afm-perl1.18-1 Interface to Adobe Font Metrics files for Perl ii libfontconfig1 2.2.2-2generic font configuration library (shared library) ii mplayer-fonts 3.5-2 Fonts for mplayer ii msttcorefonts 1.1.4 Installer for Microsoft TrueType core fonts ii psfontmgr 0.11.8 PostScript font manager -- part of Defoma, Debian Font Manager ii sharefont 0.10-12Shareware font selection for X11 ii ttf-freefont20030519-1 Freefont Serif, Sans and Mono Truetype fonts ii ult1mo-fonts1.0-10 some Type1 fonts in ISO-8859-2 encoding ii unifont 1.0-1 X11 dual-width GNU unicode font ii x-ttcidfont-conf14 Configure TrueType and CID fonts for X ii xfonts-100dpi 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 100 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-100dpi-transcoded4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 100 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10646-1) ii xfonts-75dpi4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 75 dpi fonts for X ii xfonts-75dpi-transcoded 4.3.0.dfsg.1-4 75 dpi fonts for X (transcoded from ISO 10646-1) ii xfonts-artwiz 2.5X fonts created by Artwiz, TigerT, and Daniel Erat ii xfonts-base
Bug#283659: marked as done (defoma-hints: add back button)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #283659, regarding defoma-hints: add back button to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 283659: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=283659 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1woody1 Severity: wishlist Hi! It would be nice to have a back button left to the next (or OK) button in defoma-hints. When you configure a lot of fonts and make one mistake you have to hand-edit the hints file afterwards or re-do everything. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux snell 2.4.27-xfs-20040817-client-p4-smp-4gb #1 SMP Die Aug 24 14:46:47 CEST 2004 i686 Locale: LANG=de_DE.ISO8859-15, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog0.9a-20020309a-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.10-2.backports.org.1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.6.1-8.7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -- Robert Sander Senior Manager Information Systems Epigenomics AGKleine Praesidentenstr. 110178 Berlin, Germany phone:+49-30-24345-330 fax:+49-30-24345-555 http://www.epigenomics.com robert.san...@epigenomics.com --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#328596: marked as done (apache2-mpm-prefork: cgi with /usr/bin/dot keep 100% CPU for 30 sec but from shell - less than second)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #328596,
regarding apache2-mpm-prefork: cgi with /usr/bin/dot keep 100% CPU for 30 sec
but from shell - less than second
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
328596: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328596
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: apache2-mpm-prefork
Version: 2.0.54-5
Severity: normal
Bugzilla create graphs for bug dependences with dot. And this process is
VERY slow. For the tests i am create cgi:
$ cat /var/www/bugzilla/b.cgi
#!/bin/bash
echo "Content-Type: text/html"
echo
echo
echo "Start dot " `date` ""
/usr/bin/dot -Tpng /tmp/test.dot -o /tmp/test.png
echo "Dot stopped " `date` ""
$ cat /tmp/test.dot
digraph G {
graph [URL="http://10.0.2.15/bugzilla/query.cgi";, rankdir=LR,
size="64,64"]
node [URL="http://10.0.2.15/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=\N";, style=filled,
color=lightgrey]
288 -> 289
288 -> 290
288 -> 291
288 -> 292
291 [label="291\n",color=green]
289 [label="289\n",color=green]
292 [label="292\n",color=green]
288 [label="288\n",shape=box,color=green]
290 [label="290\n",color=green]
}
Result from web:
Start dot Fri Sep 16 14:04:16 MSD 2005
Dot stopped Fri Sep 16 14:04:34 MSD 2005
Result from shell:
mars:~# su - www-data
www-data@mars:~$ /var/www/bugzilla/b.cgi
Content-Type: text/html
Start dot Fri Sep 16 14:10:27 MSD 2005
Dot stopped Fri Sep 16 14:10:27 MSD 2005
Result file test.png is same in both cases.
$ ls -la /tmp/test.png
-rw-r--r-- 1 www-data www-data 1917 2005-09-16 14:10 /tmp/test.png
$ dpkg -S /usr/bin/dot
graphviz: /usr/bin/dot
$ dpkg -l graphviz
...skipped...
ii graphviz 2.2.1-1 rich set of
graph drawing tools
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=ru_RU.KOI8-R, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.KOI8-R (charmap=KOI8-R) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to ru_RU.KOI8-R)
Versions of packages apache2-mpm-prefork depends on:
ii apache2-common2.0.54-5 next generation, scalable, extenda
ii libapr0 2.0.54-5 the Apache Portable Runtime
ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdb4.2 4.2.52-18 Berkeley v4.2 Database Libraries [
ii libexpat1 1.95.8-3 XML parsing C library - runtime li
ii libldap2 2.1.30-11 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpcre3 6.3-1 Perl 5 Compatible Regular Expressi
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii zlib1g1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime
apache2-mpm-prefork recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11.12+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Bug#360823: marked as done ("I have no idea what defoma-user does")
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #360823, regarding "I have no idea what defoma-user does" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 360823: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=360823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.8-0.1 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/share/man/man1/defoma-user.1.gz man defoma-user says "I have no idea what defoma-user does" --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#157899: marked as done (defoma-user: missing manpage)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #360823, regarding defoma-user: missing manpage to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 360823: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=360823 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.1 Severity: normal File: /usr/bin/defoma-user -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 #include - -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux bohr 2.4.16 #2 SMP Wed Nov 28 05:25:00 EST 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog 0.9b-20020519-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 3.37-3.1Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.6.1-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9ZYl++z+IwlXqWf4RAppIAJ9HDyV2YhY7QjcuXZcpwTktSSo4ZgCfSs6c xUuZWO3MtdBIJZJ/yOm8yh4= =bKAP -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#365833: marked as done (defoma: Uninitialized value in IdCache.pm)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #365833, regarding defoma: Uninitialized value in IdCache.pm to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 365833: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=365833 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.8-0.1 Severity: important IdCache.pm has uninitialized values in several lines when installing a ttf font. Apt-get session is below. This is (mostly) a testing installation, with some unstable things (wine, kernel, udev and perhaps others, but I have no idea how to find which). I've had this for quite a while already. Don't recall when it started. If there's additional info I can provide, please let me know how to produce it. quark:~# apt-get install ttf-xfree86-nonfree Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Suggested packages: xserver-xfree86 xfs-xtt The following NEW packages will be installed: ttf-xfree86-nonfree 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded. Need to get 435kB of archives. After unpacking 1073kB of additional disk space will be used. Get:1 http://suzy testing/non-free ttf-xfree86-nonfree 4.2.1-3 [435kB] Fetched 435kB in 5s (80.5kB/s) Selecting previously deselected package ttf-xfree86-nonfree. (Reading database ... 140809 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking ttf-xfree86-nonfree (from .../ttf-xfree86-nonfree_4.2.1-3_all.deb) ... Setting up ttf-xfree86-nonfree (4.2.1-3) ... Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 112, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 113, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 119, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 120, line 1. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 112, line 2. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 113, line 2. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 119, line 2. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 120, line 2. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 112, line 3. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 113, line 3. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 119, line 3. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 120, line 3. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 112, line 4. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 113, line 4. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 119, line 4. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 120, line 4. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 112, line 5. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 113, line 5. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 119, line 5. Use of uninitialized value in hash element at /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Defoma/IdCache.pm line 120, line 5. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/pango.defoma line 46. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-k7 Locale: LANG=nl_NL@euro, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.0-20060221-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.17-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.8-4
Bug#368607: marked as done (defoma: Only first shape in hint generation is outputed)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #368607,
regarding defoma: Only first shape in hint generation is outputed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
368607: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=368607
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: defoma
Version: 0.11.8-0.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A bug in the dialogues interface system causes it to only return
the first line of stdout from the dialogue/whiptail program. This
shows up in defoma-hint type1 as only the first shape attribute
being output in the generated hints.
Attached is a patch to fix this.
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_CA, LC_CTYPE=en_CA (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages defoma depends on:
ii dialog1.0-20051207-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
ii file 4.15-2 Determines file type using "magic"
ii perl 5.8.8-3Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
Versions of packages defoma recommends:
ii libft-perl1.2-15 Perl module for the FreeType libra
- -- no debconf information
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEcw8Gp7ZNUfdma/8RAj56AJ9hu5Dejh9aCuprj3QI5pRAASqzUACfT9pq
Ar5+E1iDX3VmRE3PtdtZJ8U=
=w2Kh
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- libs/libconsole.pl_ 2004-08-21 13:24:33.0 -0400
+++ libs/libconsole.pl 2006-04-14 16:33:10.0 -0400
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
my $ret = '';
if ($pid > 0) {
close(CHILD_WRITER);
- $ret .= ;
+ $ret .= join('', );
close(PARENT_READER);
waitpid($pid, 0);
$result = $?; #GLOBAL Variable: result
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11.12+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Bug#379432: marked as done (defoma: Please add Thai location info)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #379432, regarding defoma: Please add Thai location info to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 379432: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=379432 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please add Thai location info in /etc/defoma/loc-cset.data: Thai* TIS620,ISO8859-11 - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.16 Locale: LANG=th_TH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=th_TH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.0-20060221-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.17-2 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.8-6Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.52.2-5 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe Versions of packages defoma recommends: ii libft-perl1.2-16 Perl module for the FreeType libra - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEw4apqgzR7tCLR/4RAsZ0AJ9gewgZQyedUSOOaWtUlGuV7fJsYgCfYWZL cOhBopzRjTlRr4fgLGr3LSM= =O0XQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#380491: marked as done (dfontmgr ships no .desktop)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #380491, regarding dfontmgr ships no .desktop to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 380491: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=380491 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10 Severity: wishlist Hello. dfontmgr currently lacks a .desktop file. A bug was filed against the package in the Ubuntu bugtracker [1] and you can find a .desktop file attached there. It would be nice if this was included in Debian as well. [1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49443 Thanks for your time, Vassilis Pandis ___ All New Yahoo! Mail Tired of Vi@gr@! come-ons? Let our SpamGuard protect you. http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#390393: marked as done (defoma: Warnings from defoma's gs.defoma script)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #390393, regarding defoma: Warnings from defoma's gs.defoma script to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 390393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=390393 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10 Severity: minor I don't know whether it's a bug or not. So I post this report to the 'minor' section. While installing ttf-dejavu (2.10-1) fonts I've got four identical messages from /var/lib/defoma/gs.defoma script: Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line 108. Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line 108. Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line 108. Use of uninitialized value in print at /var/lib/defoma/scripts/gs.defoma line 108. -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i586) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.17-2-486 Locale: LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ru_RU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii file 4.17-3 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.52.2-7 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe Versions of packages defoma recommends: pn libft-perl (no description available) -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#397849: marked as done (Option '-t' to defoma-font does not seem to work)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #397849, regarding Option '-t' to defoma-font does not seem to work to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 397849: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397849 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10 Severity: normal Hi, It seems like the "-t" option doesn't work in defoma-font: # ls /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS* /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Bold.ttf /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Italic.ttf /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS_Bold_Italic.ttf defoma-font -t unregister truetype /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS.ttf W: /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Trebuchet_MS.ttf: not registered. # echo $? 1 The '-t' option claims to always have defoma-font return true, regardless of failure. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.0-20060221-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.17-4 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.8-6.1 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages defoma recommends: pn libft-perl (no description available) -- no debconf information --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#400461: marked as done (defoma-doc: typo in Defoma developer's guide)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #400461, regarding defoma-doc: typo in Defoma developer's guide to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 400461: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=400461 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma-doc Version: 0.11.10 Severity: minor Tags: patch Hi, the usage info for defoma-hints in the DeFoMa developer's guide contains a typo: it says to redirect stderr instead of stdout. The attached patch fixes the issue. Regards Peter -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-k7 Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- no debconf information --- /usr/share/doc/defoma-doc/developers.html/ch1.html +++ /usr/share/doc/defoma-doc/developers.html/ch1.html @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ - defoma-hints... 2> hintfile + defoma-hints ... > hintfile --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#422763: marked as done (defoma: Please add OpenType category)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #422763, regarding defoma: Please add OpenType category to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 422763: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=422763 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10-0.1 Severity: wishlist -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I want to package OpenType (*.otf) fonts, but defoma lacks a category for it. Please consider adding "opentype" category. - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=th_TH.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=th_TH.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.1-20070409-2 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.20-5 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.8-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.52.2-10 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe Versions of packages defoma recommends: pn libft-perl (no description available) - -- no debconf information -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGQBbpqgzR7tCLR/4RAqznAJ0UMQGDJdcIOvAz1DDv0CdD86I4jgCgmR7x 5gphLsZoEFg8JwO+67jhyk0= =dCQl -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#448991: marked as done (defoma integration issues breaks wormux)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #448991, regarding defoma integration issues breaks wormux to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 448991: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=448991 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: wormux Version: 0.8beta2-2 Severity: important --- Please enter the report below this line. --- Whether from launcher or from a terminal, wormux is seg fault immediately after blacking out the screen (x-session does return to normal with a re-centered mouse). From the terminal, it gets upto, "Read COPYING file for details," two \n later it prints out a segfault. Other points that might be worth noting: Last game was random islands I have been playing with an altered classic.xml file, though few problems have otherwise occurred from it (freeze on some suicides and accidental infinite teleports) --- System information. --- Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-5-686 Debian Release: lenny/sid 500 unstable lug01.eecs.wsu.edu 500 unstable ftp.us.debian.org 500 unstable ftp.fr.debian.org 500 unstable ftp.debian.nl --- Package information. --- Depends (Version) | Installed ==-+- libc6 (>= 2.6.1-1) | 2.6.1-6 libcurl3 (>= 7.16.2-1) | 7.17.0-1 libgcc1 (>= 1:4.2.1) | 1:4.2.2-3 libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.14.0) | 2.14.2-1 libglibmm-2.4-1c2a | 2.14.2-1 libkrb53 (>= 1.6.dfsg.1) | 1.6.dfsg.3~beta1-2 libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.13-4) | 1.2.15~beta5-3 libsdl-gfx1.2-4 (>= 2.0.13) | 2.0.13-3 libsdl-image1.2 (>= 1.2.5) | 1.2.6-1 libsdl-mixer1.2 (>= 1.2.6) | 1.2.8-1 libsdl-net1.2 | 1.2.7-2 libsdl-ttf2.0-0 | 2.0.9-1 libsdl1.2debian (>= 1.2.10-1) | 1.2.12-1 libsigc++-2.0-0c2a (>= 2.0.2) | 2.0.17-2 libstdc++6 (>= 4.2.1) | 4.2.2-3 libxml++2.6-2 | 2.14.0-0.1 libxml2 (>= 2.6.29) | 2.6.30.dfsg-2 wormux-data (>= 0.8beta2-2) | 0.8beta2-2 --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#464237: marked as done (family chooser output from defoma-hints is truncated)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #464237, regarding family chooser output from defoma-hints is truncated to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 464237: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=464237 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10-0.2 Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, when running defoma-hints on a (truetype) font I noticed that the help string for the family chooser is truncated. All I see is this piece of text: Choose the Family of 007_goldeneye.ttf. * Family of the font is similar to a family name of a person. A font * often has some decorated derivative fonts, but all of the derivative * fonts and its original font share a common name. Family is exactly * the shared common name. For example, Times-Roman has three decorated Regards, Bastian - -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.24treasure1 (PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (charmap=ISO-8859-15) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.1-20071028-2 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.23-1 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.8.8-12 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction ii whiptail 0.52.2-11.1Displays user-friendly dialog boxe Versions of packages defoma recommends: ii libft-perl1.2-16 Perl module for the FreeType libra - -- debconf-show failed -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHqPP7eBwlBDLsbz4RAtUHAJ0ZbrgHN/VoQAmbxCLoU0mvK0E7yQCgpCgS w3inr907SyjFqrujJpohSEI= =86tm -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#475228: marked as done (defoma: defoma-font tries to update cache in my homedir)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #475228, regarding defoma: defoma-font tries to update cache in my homedir to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 475228: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475228 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10-0.2 Severity: normal I have my homedir on an NFS mounted filesystem. Hence root has no rights on my files. When installing latex-xft-fonts, I got the following output: Setting up latex-xft-fonts (0.1-7) ... Updating fontconfig cache for /usr/share/fonts/truetype/latex-xft-fonts /home/paul/.fontconfig/f1639389e5f55db35457162d771a17f5-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/cabbd14511b9e8a55e92af97fb3a0461-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/7cf32742dd19ff6a8a373388bce19d63-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/c76f9f973bac8e62cd40e575a6c00731-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/e53cb0396a54ac7c79729c937ac67a1c-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/dda6bca639584bc8fae517b0b92041a2-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/50d89378042821ac02c965a4a01c5ab2-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/bea08e6b4199589f7b7b33e7f5fdcd52-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/da68fb8ba898140134efd55a2bb0038e-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/21a99156bb11811cef641abeda519a45-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/d0bc3e91382189c17a3af93e53fba1fe-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/4c599c202bc5c08e2d34565a40eac3b2-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/00d406b18bce33769549d25a9ea497aa-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/7d9d5d03f3b009e78b077beef6aa5ec6-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/36d5ce74dcb3fd81b5b76d02e4bc02e8-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/e96a8fab67b814b939d89b2a878934ec-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/157d853419d508e758897382da7bccb2-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied /home/paul/.fontconfig/d603f8d2c29b8a397d013a1da4ae539c-x86-64.cache-2: Permission denied Why is it trying to do that? What will break now it failed to do that? Must it do that? Thanks, Paul Slootman --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#487454: marked as done (defoma's state management isn't robust)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #487454, regarding defoma's state management isn't robust to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 487454: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487454 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ghostscript Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-2.1 Severity: minor File: /var/lib/defoma/gs.d cruft(8) finds broken symlinks: var gs.d/dirs/fonts/ n019003d.pfb n022024d.pfb... n019044d.pfb DejaVuSerif-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuSerif-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-Oblique.ttf --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#487454: marked as done (defoma's state management isn't robust)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #487459, regarding defoma's state management isn't robust to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 487459: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487459 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: ghostscript Version: 8.62.dfsg.1-2.1 Severity: minor File: /var/lib/defoma/gs.d cruft(8) finds broken symlinks: var gs.d/dirs/fonts/ n019003d.pfb n022024d.pfb... n019044d.pfb DejaVuSerif-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuSerif-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-Oblique.ttf --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#487459: marked as done (defoma's state management isn't robust)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #487459, regarding defoma's state management isn't robust to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 487459: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487459 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: x-ttcidfont-conf Version: 29 File: /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType cruft(8) finds broken symlinks: var /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType/ : DejaVuSerif-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#518604: marked as done (Don't put generated/non-config files not in /etc)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #518604, regarding Don't put generated/non-config files not in /etc to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 518604: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518604 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.10-0.2 Severity: wishlist Hi, the header of the file /etc/defoma/fontconfig.subst-rule tells it shouldn't be edited. So it can't be a config file and should be moved to /var. % sed -n '/DO NOT/,/INS/p' /etc/defoma/fontconfig.subst-rule # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE DIRECTLY! IF YOU WANT TO EDIT, TYPE # defoma-subst edit-rule fontconfig # INSTEAD. Bye, Jörg. -- System Information: Debian Release: unstable/experimental APT prefers unstable APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to de_DE.UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii dialog1.1-20080819-1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe ii file 4.26-2 Determines file type using "magic" ii perl 5.10.0-19 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction Versions of packages defoma recommends: pn libft-perl (no description available) Versions of packages defoma suggests: pn defoma-doc (no description available) pn dfontmgr (no description available) ii psfontmgr0.11.10-0.2 PostScript font manager -- part of ii x-ttcidfont-conf 32 TrueType and CID fonts configurati -- no debconf information signature.asc Description: Digital signature http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenPGP --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#487459: marked as done (defoma's state management isn't robust)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #487454, regarding defoma's state management isn't robust to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 487454: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=487454 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: x-ttcidfont-conf Version: 29 File: /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType cruft(8) finds broken symlinks: var /var/lib/defoma/x-ttcidfont-conf.d/dirs/TrueType/ : DejaVuSerif-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-Oblique.ttf DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#558105: marked as done (defoma-doc: defoma-hints docs should mention that opentype is not supported)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #558105, regarding defoma-doc: defoma-hints docs should mention that opentype is not supported to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 558105: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=558105 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma-doc Severity: minor I am trying to install local Opentype fonts into Debian using defoma. For some years now, Opentype is the industry standard for fonts. defoma seems to supports opentype fonts somehow, but defoma-hints obviously doesn't support autogenerating hints for this (bug #477435, side note in bug #422763). The bug reports exist since two years now, this seems to be a design limitation. The defoma documentation doesn't mention any font formats, so one would expect opentype is supported by all parts of defoma. I would propose adding a sentence like "Supported font categories are truetype and type1" to the "Description" section of the defoma-hints manpage (or supporting opentype, but that doesn't seem to happen soon). Thanks, Michael Below -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#542575: marked as done (defoma: please provide a debhelper sequence addon)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #542575,
regarding defoma: please provide a debhelper sequence addon
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
542575: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=542575
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: defoma
Version: 0.11.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
please provide a debhelper sequence addon in the defoma package. This
would make it possible to build font packages with the following tiny
debian/rules file making use of the latest debhelper features:
#!/usr/bin/make -f
%:
dh --with defoma $@
The attached file needs to get installed into
"/usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/" in order to make this
feature available. It does nothing more than run dh_defoma right after
dh_install, which should be all that's necessary for font packages
with respect to debhelper calls.
Cheers,
Fabian
--
Dipl.-Phys. Fabian Greffrath
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Lehrstuhl für Energieanlagen und Energieprozesstechnik (LEAT)
Universitätsstr. 150, IB 3/134
D-44780 Bochum
Telefon: +49 (0)234 / 32-26334
Fax: +49 (0)234 / 32-14227
E-Mail: greffr...@leat.ruhr-uni-bochum.de
#!/usr/bin/perl
use warnings;
use strict;
use Debian::Debhelper::Dh_Lib;
insert_after("dh_install", "dh_defoma");
1;--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11.12+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Bug#551515: marked as done (defoma: Do not register non-existant fonts from .hints)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #551515,
regarding defoma: Do not register non-existant fonts from .hints
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
551515: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: defoma
Version: 0.11.10-0.2
Severity: normal
There always seems to be packages in Debian that list wrong or
otherwise non-existing paths or file names in the "begin" lines in
their .hints files. For instance, lenny contains at least 11 such
broken .hints files.
Currently, defoma-font silently accepts these bogus entries and
creates bogus references (such as dangling symlinks) for such
non-existing font files.
I would strongly suggest that this behaviour be changed as
follows:
1. If the begin line points to a non-existing file, do not try
to register the font (but do continue to support
unregister/purge for such dead entries!).
2. If at all possible, report any such failures loudly, so font
packagers will know their package is broken.
Something like this in defoma-font.pl sub hintfile_read() in the
'end' branch:
} elsif ($Debian::Defoma::Id::Register and not -f $font) {
printe("$hintfile($lnum): $font: ",
"Font file does not exist!");
$font = '';
@hints = ();
And then in each sub com_[re]register*()
$Debian::Defoma::Id::Register = 1;
If necessary, add the Register variable in the appropriate module
with a default value of 0.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31jbj3.4-43 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages defoma depends on:
ii file 4.26-1 Determines file type using "magic"
ii perl 5.10.0-19lenny2Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii whiptail 0.52.2-11.3+lenny1 Displays user-friendly dialog boxe
Versions of packages defoma recommends:
pn libft-perl (no description available)
Versions of packages defoma suggests:
ii defoma-doc 0.11.10-0.2 Debian Font Manager documentation
pn dfontmgr (no description available)
ii psfontmgr0.11.10-0.2 PostScript font manager -- part of
ii x-ttcidfont-conf 31 TrueType and CID fonts configurati
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.11.12+rm
Dear submitter,
as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.
For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494
The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.
This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmas...@debian.org.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
Bug#655770: marked as done (/etc/defoma not cleaned up on purge (fontconfig.subst-rule))
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 18:37:48 + with message-id and subject line Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #655770, regarding /etc/defoma not cleaned up on purge (fontconfig.subst-rule) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 655770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655770 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: defoma Version: 0.11.12 Severity: normal Hi, today I purged the defoma package as I apparently had no more reverse depencencies. After purging the package, I still had a /etc/defoma/ directory which contained a file named /etc/defoma/fontconfig.subst-rule. This file doesn't doesn't seem to belong to any package (dpkg -S yield nothing), but from a quick google search, it seems this file is created by defoma. So I guess defoma should clean up this file on purge, and try to rmdir /etc/defoma. Cheers, Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.utf8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages defoma depends on: ii file 5.09-2 ii whiptail 0.52.14-7 Versions of packages defoma recommends: ii libfont-freetype-perl 0.03-1+b2 Versions of packages defoma suggests: pn defoma-doc pn psfontmgr pn x-ttcidfont-conf --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 0.11.12+rm Dear submitter, as the package defoma has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/651494 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) --- End Message ---
Bug#651494: Removed package(s) from unstable
We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: defoma |0.11.12 | source, all defoma-doc |0.11.12 | all psfontmgr |0.11.12 | all --- Reason --- RoQA; Debian-specific, unmaintained, obsoleted by fontconfig -- Note that the package(s) have simply been removed from the tag database and may (or may not) still be in the pool; this is not a bug. The package(s) will be physically removed automatically when no suite references them (and in the case of source, when no binary references it). Please also remember that the changes have been done on the master archive (ftp-master.debian.org) and will not propagate to any mirrors (ftp.debian.org included) until the next cron.daily run at the earliest. Packages are usually not removed from testing by hand. Testing tracks unstable and will automatically remove packages which were removed from unstable when removing them from testing causes no dependency problems. The release team can force a removal from testing if it is really needed, please contact them if this should be the case. We try to close Bugs which have been reported against this package automatically. But please check all old bugs, if they where closed correctly or should have been re-assign to another package. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 651...@bugs.debian.org. The full log for this bug can be viewed at http://bugs.debian.org/651494 This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Alexander Reichle-Schmehl (the ftpmaster behind the curtain) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sq0uo-0001dt...@franck.debian.org
Processing of adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2_amd64.changes
adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2.dsc adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2.tar.gz adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sq2co-00059n...@franck.debian.org
adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2.dsc to main/a/adept/adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2.dsc adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2.tar.gz to main/a/adept/adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2.tar.gz adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2_amd64.deb to main/a/adept/adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2_amd64.deb Changes: adept (3.0~beta7.2+qa2) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Fix build failure with GCC 4.7. Closes: #667095, #655512. Override entries for your package: adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2.dsc - source kde adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa2_amd64.deb - optional kde Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Closing bugs: 655512 667095 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sq3d0-0004aj...@franck.debian.org
Bug#655512: marked as done (adept: FTBFS: /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h:125:7: error: expected primary-expression before '.' token)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 21:05:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#655512: fixed in adept 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 has caused the Debian Bug report #655512, regarding adept: FTBFS: /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h:125:7: error: expected primary-expression before '.' token to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 655512: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=655512 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: src:adept Version: 3.0~beta7.2+nmu2 Severity: serious Tags: sid wheezy Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past) Hi! Your package failed to build on the buildds: [ 77%] Building CXX object adept/CMakeFiles/adeptlib.dir/adeptlib_automoc.o cd "/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/adept" && /usr/bin/c++-Woverloaded-virtual -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fexceptions -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I/usr/include/KDE -I/usr/include/qt4/phonon -I/usr/include/qt4/QtXmlPatterns -I/usr/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/include/qt4/QtUiTools -I/usr/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/include/qt4/QtSvg -I/usr/include/qt4/QtSql -I/usr/include/qt4/QtScriptTools -I/usr/include/qt4/QtScript -I/usr/include/qt4/QtNetwork -I/usr/include/qt4/QtHelp -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDeclarative -I/usr/include/qt4/QtDBus -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt3Support -I/usr/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/share/qt4/mkspecs/default -I/usr/include/qt4 -I"/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/adept/.." -I/usr/include/tagcoll-2.0.13 -I"/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1" -I"/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu" -I"/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/adept" -I"/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/adept/.." -O0 -g -fexceptions -o CMakeFiles/adeptlib.dir/adeptlib_automoc.o -c "/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/adept/adeptlib_automoc.cpp" In file included from /usr/include/xapian/enquire.h:33:0, from /usr/include/xapian.h:46, from /build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/adept/../ept/core/xapian.h:2, from /build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/adept/../adept/util.h:6, from /build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/adept/../../adept/applicationswidget.h:6, from /build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/adept/moc_applicationswidget.cpp:10, from /build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu/adept/adeptlib_automoc.cpp:5: /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h:66:10: error: a template-id may not appear in a using-declaration /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h: In member function 'void Xapian::MultiValueKeyMaker::add_value(Xapian::valueno, bool)': /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h:79:7: error: expected primary-expression before '.' token /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h: At global scope: /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h:112:10: error: a template-id may not appear in a using-declaration /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h: In member function 'void Xapian::MultiValueSorter::add(Xapian::valueno, bool)': /usr/include/xapian/keymaker.h:125:7: error: expected primary-expression before '.' token make[3]: *** [adept/CMakeFiles/adeptlib.dir/adeptlib_automoc.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu' make[2]: *** [adept/CMakeFiles/adeptlib.dir/all] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1-kfreebsd-amd64-vxHzuy/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-kfreebsd-gnu' dh_auto_build: make -j1 returned exit code 2 make: *** [build] Error 2 Full build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=adept&arch=k
Bug#667095: marked as done (adept: ftbfs with GCC-4.7)
Your message dated Thu, 03 May 2012 21:05:06 + with message-id and subject line Bug#667095: fixed in adept 3.0~beta7.2+qa2 has caused the Debian Bug report #667095, regarding adept: ftbfs with GCC-4.7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 667095: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667095 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: adept Version: 3.0~beta7.2+qa1 Severity: important Tags: sid wheezy User: debian-...@lists.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-4.7 The package fails to build in a test rebuild on at least amd64 with gcc-4.7/g++-4.7, but succeeds to build with gcc-4.6/g++-4.6. The severity of this report may be raised before the wheezy release. vocabulary.cc:140:40: error: 'lseek' was not declared in this scope The full build log can be found at: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2012/03/29-clang-gcc47/unstable-gcc47/adept_3.0~beta7.2+qa1_unstable-gcc47.log The last lines of the build log are at the end of this report. Some hints on fixing these issues can be found at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/porting_to.html To build with GCC 4.7, either set CC=gcc-4.7 CXX=g++-4.7 explicitly, or install the gcc, g++, gfortran, ... packages from experimental. [...] /«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/ept/core/xapian.h: In constructor 'ept::core::xapian::List::List(Xapian::Enquire)': /«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/ept/core/xapian.h:87:26: warning: unused variable 'e' [-Wunused-variable] /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles" 26 [ 3%] Building CXX object ept/CMakeFiles/ept.dir/core/apt/recordparser.o cd "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ept" && /usr/bin/c++ -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -ansi -Wundef -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wformat-security -fno-exceptions -DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS -fno-check-new -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -Werror=return-type -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fexceptions -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I"/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1" -I"/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu" -I/usr/include/tagcoll-2.0.13-fexceptions -fPIC -fvisibility=default -o CMakeFiles/ept.dir/core/apt/recordparser.o -c "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/ept/core/apt/recordparser.cpp" /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles" 27 [ 4%] Building CXX object ept/CMakeFiles/ept.dir/core/apt/record.o cd "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ept" && /usr/bin/c++ -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -ansi -Wundef -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wformat-security -fno-exceptions -DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS -fno-check-new -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -Werror=return-type -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fexceptions -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I"/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1" -I"/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu" -I/usr/include/tagcoll-2.0.13-fexceptions -fPIC -fvisibility=default -o CMakeFiles/ept.dir/core/apt/record.o -c "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/ept/core/apt/record.cpp" /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles" 28 [ 5%] Building CXX object ept/CMakeFiles/ept.dir/progresscallback.o cd "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ept" && /usr/bin/c++ -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -ansi -Wundef -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointer-arith -Wformat-security -fno-exceptions -DQT_NO_EXCEPTIONS -fno-check-new -fno-common -Woverloaded-virtual -fno-threadsafe-statics -fvisibility=hidden -Werror=return-type -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -fexceptions -O2 -g -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -I"/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1" -I"/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu" -I/usr/include/tagcoll-2.0.13-fexceptions -fPIC -fvisibility=default -o CMakeFiles/ept.dir/progresscallback.o -c "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/ept/progresscallback.cpp" /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/CMakeFiles" 29 [ 6%] Building CXX object ept/CMakeFiles/ept.dir/test.o cd "/«BUILDDIR»/adept-3.0~beta7.2+qa1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/ept" && /usr/bin/c++ -D_BSD_SOURCE -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -ansi -Wundef -Wcast-align -Wchar-subscripts -Wall -W -Wpointe
