Re: RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free
Le Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 08:39:17AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit : > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 01:31:49PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > reassign 569648 ftp.debian.org > > retitle 569648 RM: d4x -- RoQA; non-free > > affects 569648 + d4x > > thanks > > Given that popcon of the package is still quite high, I believe a QA > upload to non-free would have been a better first move (and I would have > volunteered to do it). Hi Stefano, I considered it as well, but I have the feeling that it would require to contact Upstream again to ask if he agrees with producing binaries from patched sources, since that is what the package would still do after being transferred to the non-free section of our archive. As a reminder, here is what the source file headers contain. * This Program is free but not GPL!!! You can't modify it * without agreement with author. You can't distribute modified * program but you can distribute unmodified program. Here is the summary of the content of our diff.gz: d4x-2.5.7.1/de.po d4x-2.5.7.1/configure d4x-2.5.7.1/configure.ac d4x-2.5.7.1/po/de.po d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/copyright d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/changelog d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/rules d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/control d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/compat d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/d4x-common.docs d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/nt-icon.xpm d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/d4x.menu d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/d4x.install d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/watch d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/d4x.desktop d4x-2.5.7.1/debian/d4x-common.install d4x-2.5.7.1/main/signal.cc d4x-2.5.7.1/main/socket.cc d4x-2.5.7.1/main/locstr.cc d4x-2.5.7.1/main/html.cc d4x-2.5.7.1/main/ftp.cc d4x-2.5.7.1/main/face/list.cc d4x-2.5.7.1/main/face/edit.cc Of course, if there is a volunteer for the task, I will not block him… Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100225082314.ge26...@kunpuu.plessy.org
Bug#253506: marked as done (picax: Should add d-i include/exclude files on the CD)
Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:12:11 + (WET) with message-id <20100225101211.173bac...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package picax has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #253506, regarding picax: Should add d-i include/exclude files on the CD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 253506: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=253506 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: picax Version: 1.3 Severity: wishlist When picax is able to make CDs with debian-installer, it should make it possible to create the following files on the CD: .disk/udeb_include .disk/udeb_exclude .disk/base_include .disk/base_exclude This will make it possible to make d-i customized installations. The files should be copied from locations specified as arguments to picax. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.4+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/253506 in Debian BTS against the package picax. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/379039. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Marco Rodrigues --- End Message ---
Bug#571383: quiteinsanegimpplugin: Could not find usable Gimp version
Source: quiteinsanegimpplugin Version: 0.3-9 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-2010-02-24 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[2]: Entering directory > `/build/user-quiteinsanegimpplugin_0.3-9-amd64-f932rv/quiteinsanegimpplugin-0.3' > make[2]: Leaving directory > `/build/user-quiteinsanegimpplugin_0.3-9-amd64-f932rv/quiteinsanegimpplugin-0.3' > *** Creating aclocal.m4 > *** Creating configure > configure.in:21: warning: AC_REQUIRE: `AC_PROG_CXX' was expanded before it > was required > ../../lib/autoconf/c.m4:667: AC_LANG_COMPILER(C++) is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:316: AC_LANG_COMPILER_REQUIRE is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2645: AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2654: AC_TRY_LINK is expanded from... > ../../lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4:598: AS_IF is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1998: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from... > aclocal.m4:2688: KDE_CHECK_COMPILER_FLAG is expanded from... > aclocal.m4:2748: AC_CHECK_COMPILERS is expanded from... > configure.in:21: the top level > *** Creating config.h template > configure.in:21: warning: AC_REQUIRE: `AC_PROG_CXX' was expanded before it > was required > ../../lib/autoconf/c.m4:667: AC_LANG_COMPILER(C++) is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:316: AC_LANG_COMPILER_REQUIRE is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2645: AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2654: AC_TRY_LINK is expanded from... > ../../lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4:598: AS_IF is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1998: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from... > aclocal.m4:2688: KDE_CHECK_COMPILER_FLAG is expanded from... > aclocal.m4:2748: AC_CHECK_COMPILERS is expanded from... > configure.in:21: the top level > *** Creating Makefile templates > configure.in:21: warning: AC_REQUIRE: `AC_PROG_CXX' was expanded before it > was required > ../../lib/autoconf/c.m4:667: AC_LANG_COMPILER(C++) is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/lang.m4:316: AC_LANG_COMPILER_REQUIRE is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2645: AC_LINK_IFELSE is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:2654: AC_TRY_LINK is expanded from... > ../../lib/m4sugar/m4sh.m4:598: AS_IF is expanded from... > ../../lib/autoconf/general.m4:1998: AC_CACHE_VAL is expanded from... > aclocal.m4:2688: KDE_CHECK_COMPILER_FLAG is expanded from... > aclocal.m4:2748: AC_CHECK_COMPILERS is expanded from... > configure.in:21: the top level > *** Postprocessing Makefile templates > *** Creating date/time stamp > *** Finished > Don't forget to run ./configure > If you haven't done so in a while, run ./configure --help > make[1]: Leaving directory > `/build/user-quiteinsanegimpplugin_0.3-9-amd64-f932rv/quiteinsanegimpplugin-0.3' > QTDIR=/usr/share/qt3 ./configure \ > --host=x86_64-linux-gnu \ > --build=x86_64-linux-gnu \ > --prefix=/usr \ > --enable-mt \ > --disable-rpath \ > --disable-qt-styles > configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --disable-rpath, --disable-qt-styles > checking build system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > checking host system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > checking target system type... x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > checking for -p flag to install... yes > checking whether build environment is sane... yes > checking for gawk... no > checking for mawk... mawk > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes > checking for style of include used by make... GNU > checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-g++... x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ > checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... no > checking whether x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ accepts -g... no > checking dependency style of x86_64-linux-gnu-g++... gcc3 > checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc... x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc > checking whether the C compiler works... yes > checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out > checking for suffix of executables... > checking whether we are cross compiling... no > checking for suffix of object files... o > checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes > checking whether x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc accepts -g... yes > checking for x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed > checking dependency style of x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc... gcc3 > checking how to run the C preprocessor... x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -E > checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... (cached) no > checking whether x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ accepts -g... (cached) no > checking dependency style of x86_64-linux-gnu-g++... (cached) gcc3 > checking whether x86_64-linux-gnu-g++ supports -Wmi
Bug#437493: marked as done (rep-xmms: not binNMU safe)
Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:07:05 + (WET)
with message-id <20100225100705.7e9d3b...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package rep-xmms has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #437493,
regarding rep-xmms: not binNMU safe
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
437493: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=437493
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rep-xmms
Version: 0.4-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Please apply the attached patch to make your package binNMU safe.
More info at http://wiki.debian.org/binNMU
Let me know if you have questions about this patch.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.22-1-k7 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Versions of packages rep-xmms depends on:
pn librep9(no description available)
pn xmms (no description available)
rep-xmms recommends no packages.
--- /tmp/control2007-08-12 23:55:38.0 +0300
+++ debian/control 2007-08-12 23:56:36.0 +0300
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
Package: sawfish-xmms
Section: x11
Architecture: all
-Depends: rep-xmms (= ${Source-Version}), sawfish (>= 0.37.2) | sawfish-gnome
(>= 0.37.2)
+Depends: rep-xmms (>= ${source:Version}), sawfish (>= 0.37.2) | sawfish-gnome
(>= 0.37.2)
Description: sawfish bindings for XMMS
Contains a lisp module needed to make use of the rep bindings for xmms
from within sawfish.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.4-5+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/437493 in Debian BTS
against the package rep-xmms. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/348786. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
Bug#239853: marked as done (incorrect component list generated on CD Release file)
Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:12:11 + (WET) with message-id <20100225101211.2c675c...@kmos.homeip.net> and subject line Package picax has been removed from Debian has caused the Debian Bug report #239853, regarding incorrect component list generated on CD Release file to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 239853: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=239853 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: picax Version: 1.3 Severity: normal Mailing list thread: http://lists.progeny.com/archive/anaconda-workers/200403/msg00099.html When creating a sarge CD after mirroring sarge main, contrib, and non-free, the Release file on the first CD had contrib and non-free in it, despite contrib and non-free not appearing on the CD or specified on the picax line. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Version: 1.4+rm You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/239853 in Debian BTS against the package picax. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will remain open for older distributions. For more information about this package's removal, read http://bugs.debian.org/379039. That bug might give the reasons why this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements. Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question. Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- Marco Rodrigues --- End Message ---
Bug#403455: marked as done (rioutil: missing udev rules)
Your message dated Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:00:28 + (WET)
with message-id <20100225100028.15c359...@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line Package rioutil has been removed from Debian
has caused the Debian Bug report #403455,
regarding rioutil: missing udev rules
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
403455: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=403455
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: rioutil
Version: 1.4.4-3
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
The rioutil package does not provide udev rules for usb devices.
Attached is an udev rules file with all the device ids from driver.h. I
only tested it with the device I own (Rio Chiba).
Philippe
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (900, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages rioutil depends on:
ii libc62.3.6.ds1-8 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii libusb-0.1-4 2:0.1.12-2 userspace USB programming library
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-13 compression library - runtime
rioutil recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
# udev rules for rioutil
ACTION!="add", GOTO="rioutil_rules_end"
SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="rioutil_rules_end"
# Rio 600
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5001", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio 800
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5002", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio PSAPLAY
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5003", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio S10
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5005", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio S50
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5006", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio S35
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5007", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio 900
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5008", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio S30
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5009", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio Fuse
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="500d", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio Chiba
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="500e", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio Cali
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="500f", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio S11
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5010", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
# Rio Riot
SYSFS{idVendor}=="045a", SYSFS{idProduct}=="5010", MODE="0660", GROUP="plugdev"
LABEL="rioutil_rules_end"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.4.4-3+rm
You filed the bug http://bugs.debian.org/403455 in Debian BTS
against the package rioutil. I'm closing it at *unstable*, but it will
remain open for older distributions.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/323477. That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
isqueiros baratos briquets accendini encendedores feuerzeuge lighters
www.isqueiros.comNovas regras apartir de 11 - 03 - 2008 child-resistantOferta da caixa dos de PedraOFERTASó 45 euros IVA incluido e portespara Portugal Continental( Total 150 Isqueiros )TMN.966 927 624minisPromoção até 31-03-2010Caixas de 50 unidades cores sortidasCompra de 2 caixas 50 isqueiros electronicos
Processed: Re: closing 562373
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 562373
Bug #562373 {Done: Ralf Treinen } [src:valknut] valknut:
FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency: libdc0-dev
> notfixed 562373 0.3.13-1
Bug #562373 [src:valknut] valknut: FTBFS: Nonexistent build-dependency:
libdc0-dev
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #562373 to the same values
previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.126710489924738.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#562373: closing 562373
reopen 562373 notfixed 562373 0.3.13-1 thanks On 21/02/10 at 21:42 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > close 562373 0.3.13-1 > thanks > > libdc0-dev is available in unstable. -Ralf. No (well, at least not on amd64 and most of the other architectures), not since 0.3.23-1. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100225131445.ga31...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#571432: im-sdk: FTBFS: File Size of UdCiku.dat should be 3852 0xF0C
Source: im-sdk Version: 12.3.91-6.5 Severity: serious User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20100224 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part: > make[6]: Entering directory > `/build/user-im-sdk_12.3.91-6.5-amd64-aHB50H/im-sdk-12.3.91/build-tree/iiimf-12.3.91-svn2814/leif/sch_le_sun/src/input_methods/newpinyin/data' > ../util/mkciku > File Size of UdCiku.dat should be 3852 0xF0C > make[6]: *** [PyCiku.dat] Segmentation fault > make[6]: Leaving directory > `/build/user-im-sdk_12.3.91-6.5-amd64-aHB50H/im-sdk-12.3.91/build-tree/iiimf-12.3.91-svn2814/leif/sch_le_sun/src/input_methods/newpinyin/data' > make[5]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2010/02/24/im-sdk_12.3.91-6.5_lsid64.buildlog A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not accessible from the build systems. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2010022510.ga32...@xanadu.blop.info
Bug#571515: vcs-load-dirs: FTBFS with Python 2.6 as default
Source: vcs-load-dirs Version: 1.1.7 Severity: important User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org Usertags: python2.6 Hello, When rebuilt in an environment with Python 2.6 as the default version, your package failed to build from source. Here are the relevant parts of the build log: | python setup.py install --root=`pwd`/debian/tmp \ | --no-compile | running install | running build | running build_py | running build_scripts | running install_lib [...] | running install_scripts | creating /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin | copying build/scripts-2.6/git_load_dirs -> /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin | copying build/scripts-2.6/svk_load_dirs -> /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin | copying build/scripts-2.6/baz_load_dirs -> /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin | copying build/scripts-2.6/darcs_load_dirs -> /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin | copying build/scripts-2.6/hg_load_dirs -> /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin | copying build/scripts-2.6/tla_load_dirs -> /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin | changing mode of /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin/git_load_dirs to 755 | changing mode of /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin/svk_load_dirs to 755 | changing mode of /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin/baz_load_dirs to 755 | changing mode of /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin/darcs_load_dirs to 755 | changing mode of /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin/hg_load_dirs to 755 | changing mode of /build/user-vcs-load-dirs_1.1.7-amd64-6EYwbG/vcs-load-dirs-1.1.7/debian/tmp/usr/local/bin/tla_load_dirs to 755 [...] | dh_install -i | dh_install: Compatibility levels before 5 are deprecated. | cp: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/bin/tla_load_dirs': No such file or directory | dh_install: cp -a ./debian/tmp/usr/bin/tla_load_dirs debian/tla-load-dirs/usr/bin/ returned exit code 1 If you need help with fixing this bug, don't hesitate to ask on #debian-python or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org. -- Jakub Wilk signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#571484: zbar: uses python2.6/site-packages with Python 2.6 as default
Source: zbar
Version: 0.8+dfsg-3
Severity: important
User: debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: python2.6
Hello,
When rebuilt in an environment with Python 2.6 as the default version,
your binary package contained these files:
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/zbarpygtk.so
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/zbar.so
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/zbar.la
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/zbarpygtk.la
Here are the relevant parts of the build log:
| checking for a Python interpreter with version >= 2.3.5... python
| checking for python... /usr/bin/python
| checking for python version... 2.6
| checking for python platform... linux2
| checking for python script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages
| checking for python extension module directory...
${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages
The correct location of Python modules for Python >= 2.6 is
/usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages. In fact, packages shipping files in
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages will break installation of
python2.6-minimal.
If you need help with fixing this bug, don't hesitate to ask on
#debian-python or debian-pyt...@lists.debian.org.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#562373: closing 562373
Bonsoir Lucas, On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:14:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > reopen 562373 > notfixed 562373 0.3.13-1 > thanks > > On 21/02/10 at 21:42 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > close 562373 0.3.13-1 > > thanks > > > > libdc0-dev is available in unstable. -Ralf. > > No (well, at least not on amd64 and most of the other architectures), > not since 0.3.23-1. There is something strange here. Indeed, madison says: % rmadison --suite=unstable libdc0-dev libdc0-dev | 0.3.13-1 | unstable | armel, hurd-i386 And that is consistent with what packages.debian.org displays. However, on my amd64/sid machine: % apt-cache show libdc0-dev Package: libdc0-dev Priority: optional Section: libdevel Installed-Size: 2232 Maintainer: Debian QA Group Architecture: amd64 Source: libdc0 Version: 0.3.13-1 Depends: libdc0c2 (= 0.3.13-1) Filename: pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0-dev_0.3.13-1_amd64.deb [...] and https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libdc0 says that libdc0 has been compiled for all architectures (except hurd). Any idea what is going on here ? -Ralf. -- Ralf Treinen Laboratoire Preuves, Programmes et Systèmes Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France. http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~treinen/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100225185318.ga10...@uranium.pps.jussieu.fr
Bug#562373: closing 562373
On 25/02/10 at 19:53 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Bonsoir Lucas, > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:14:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > reopen 562373 > > notfixed 562373 0.3.13-1 > > thanks > > > > On 21/02/10 at 21:42 +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > > close 562373 0.3.13-1 > > > thanks > > > > > > libdc0-dev is available in unstable. -Ralf. > > > > No (well, at least not on amd64 and most of the other architectures), > > not since 0.3.23-1. > > There is something strange here. Indeed, madison says: > > % rmadison --suite=unstable libdc0-dev > libdc0-dev | 0.3.13-1 | unstable | armel, hurd-i386 > > And that is consistent with what packages.debian.org displays. > > However, on my amd64/sid machine: > > % apt-cache show libdc0-dev > Package: libdc0-dev > Priority: optional > Section: libdevel > Installed-Size: 2232 > Maintainer: Debian QA Group > Architecture: amd64 > Source: libdc0 > Version: 0.3.13-1 > Depends: libdc0c2 (= 0.3.13-1) > Filename: pool/main/libd/libdc0/libdc0-dev_0.3.13-1_amd64.deb > [...] > > and https://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pkg=libdc0 says that libdc0 has > been compiled for all architectures (except hurd). Any idea what is going > on here ? Yes: 0.3.13-1 (which is the previous version of the package) had a libc0-dev package. 0.3.23-1 (the current version) has a libdc-dev package. However, on hurd and armel, 0.3.23-1 failed to build (on armel, the package is marked 'Building', which means that the buildd maintainer didn't mark it as 'Failed'). So the current version in unstable for hurd and armel is still 0.3.13-1. The version you are seeing with apt-cache is probably the version in testing (if you have both testing and unstable in your /etc/apt/sources.list). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100225190713.ga28...@xanadu.blop.info
Processed: tagging 571191, tagging 571220, tagging 571342, tagging 571350, tagging 571351, tagging 571374 ...
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > # doesn't affect stable > tags 571191 + squeeze sid Bug #571191 [music123] music123: please upgrade to gnat-4.4 Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571220 + squeeze sid Bug #571220 [phppgadmin] phppgadmin reports returning by reference is depreciated and fails (classes/Misc.php line 342) Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571342 + squeeze sid Bug #571342 [src:openam] openam: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: libopenh323-dev: Depends: libpt-1.10.10-dev Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571350 + squeeze sid Bug #571350 [src:ohphone] ohphone: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: libopenh323-dev: Depends: libpt-1.10.10-dev Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571351 + squeeze sid Bug #571351 [src:bidiv] bidiv: FTBFS: bidiv.c:159: undefined reference to `fribidi_iso8859_8_to_unicode_c' Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571374 + squeeze sid Bug #571374 [src:the] the: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: regina-rexx: Depends: libregina3 (>= 3.5-1) Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571383 + squeeze sid Bug #571383 [src:quiteinsanegimpplugin] quiteinsanegimpplugin: Could not find usable Gimp version Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571385 + squeeze sid Bug #571385 [src:pwlib-titan] pwlib-titan: FTBFS: Unsatisfiable build-dependency: libdc1394-13-dev: Depends: libdc1394-13 (= 1.1.0-5) Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571404 + squeeze sid Bug #571404 [src:katoob] katoob: FTBFS: configure: error: fribidi-config not found. Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571417 + squeeze sid Bug #571417 [src:omniorb4] omniorb4: superseded by omniorb-dfsg, should be removed? Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > tags 571421 + squeeze sid Bug #571421 [src:libhtml-calendarmonth-perl] libhtml-calendarmonth-perl: FTBFS: tests failed Added tag(s) sid and squeeze. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.126713117911105.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
