Re: RFS: dict-freedict -- Freedict dictionary packages

2005-09-29 Thread Pierre Machard
Hi,

First of all thanks to Kestutis (Sorry for name's spelling, I am using
ISO-8859-15 on this computer) for his work on this package. 

I was about to upload Kestutis Biliunas package, when I saw recent 
activities in the BTS. That's why I am sending this email. 

On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:48:14AM +0300, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for dict-freedict packages. They are
> already in Debian, but was orphaned by previous maintainer
> John Goerzen. This consist the 47 binary packages. There is the
> extract from the .changes file:
> 
> ->8-->8-->8-
> Closes: 145584 148209 154537 159304 164559 164838 174695 179281 186044
> 205417 206113 215001 215014 222853 226895 226904 284496 302549 309814
> 310857 317078 318024 320474
> Changes: 
>  freedict (1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>* New maintainer (Closes: #206113).

Do not worry if I set my name as uploader, so that it's easy for me to
track packages I am sponsoring.

>* Updated with the new upstream versions (all, except eng-hun,
>  hun-eng and eng-por) (Closes: #148209, #154537) . Added new
>  dictionaries: eng-ara, eng-rom, eng-scr, ita-eng (Closes: #309814)
>  and wel-eng. So, the source tarbal version bumped to 1.2.

Is upstream always active ? I saw that tarball where build in 2003. Ok,
languages do not evolve quickly, but I wonder if typoes are fixed or not
upstream.

>* All the dictionaries unformated, fixed the headers, removed the
>  many duplicated entries for most words in the dictionaries (but
>  not all) (Closes: #186044), and formated using locale en_US.UTF-8
>  again (Closes: #145584, #164559, #222853, #320474):
>  - now all dictionaries have header 00-database-utf8 in dict
>files (Closes: #174695, #317078).

Did you send your patches about utf-8 upstream ? I think that your way 
to build the package address all the problem described in BR like
#222853, Michael or Bob, do you argree with my statement about that point?

>  - fixed some spelling mistakes in the eng-fra dictionary
>(Closes: #302549, #310857).
>  - changed incorrect entry for "elemination" to "elimination" in the
>eng-deu dictionary (Closes: #284496).
>  - corrected the references to "Africaan" in the afr-deu dictionary
>to "Afrikaans" (Closes: #318024).

What about those typo ? Did you forward it upstream ?

>* Changed files debian/{postinst, postrm} (Closes: #215001).
>* Added the file debian/README.Debian with a note about encoding.
>  Added the warning about setting locale in /etc/defaults/dictd to
>  the file debian/postinst (Closes: #179281, #226895, #159304).
>* Removed the files from debian directory: control.tmpl,
>  gencontrol.py and namefixup.py (no need any more)
>  (Closes: #215014).
>* debian/control:
>  - bumped Standards-Version to 3.6.2 (no changes required).
>  - removed Build-Depends on python2.3 and python2.3-dictdlib
>packages and added Build-Depends on dictfmt and locales packages.
>  - removed dict-freedict meta-package, and added providing the
>virtual dict-freedict package (Closes: #205417).
>  - added the new binary packages for dictionaries eng-ara, eng-rom,
>eng-scr, ita-eng and wel-eng.
>  - slo-eng package description changed to "Slovak-..." instead of
>"Slovenian-..." (Closes: #164838).
>* debian/copyright:
>  - fixed the text formating (Closes: #226904).
>  - changed the postall adress of the FSF.
> ->8-->8-->8-
> 
> The packages is linda, lintian clean and builds with pbuilder.

It looks like perfect to me. Kestutis, please take the time to discuss
on the bug tracking system. I am not sure that Michael was aware that
you were working on this package. Wnpp bugs are not reported in the same
category. I think we should improve it.

I'll upload the package in 7 days if nobody objects. I add some bugs in
blind carbon copy. (Those that adress issues with encoding)

The packages are available on kebil's repository at
http://kebil.ghost.lt/debian/pool/freedict/

deb  http://kebil.ghost.lt/ debian/
deb-src  http://kebil.ghost.lt/ debian/

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: dict-freedict -- Freedict dictionary packages

2005-09-29 Thread Joost van Baal
Hi Pierre,

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 09:57:54AM +0200, Pierre Machard wrote:
> 
> I was about to upload Kestutis Biliunas package, when I saw recent 
> activities in the BTS. That's why I am sending this email. 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 10:48:14AM +0300, K?stutis Bili?nas wrote:
> > 
> > I am looking for a sponsor for dict-freedict packages.

> I'll upload the package in 7 days if nobody objects. I add some bugs in
> blind carbon copy. (Those that adress issues with encoding)

I am working on it, and plan to upload today.  See
http://sponsors.debian.net/viewpkg.php?id=83
and http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2005/09/msg00438.html .

Thanks, Bye,

Joost




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: dict-freedict -- Freedict dictionary packages

2005-09-29 Thread Joost van Baal
Hi,

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> 
> plan to upload today.

I've just uploaded Kęstutis's latest version of 1.2-1 .

Bye,

Joost



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: RFS: dict-freedict -- Freedict dictionary packages

2005-09-29 Thread Pierre Machard
Hi,

On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 01:36:03PM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > 
> > plan to upload today.
> 
> I've just uploaded K??stutis's latest version of 1.2-1 .

Ok that's nice.

Cheers,
-- 
Pierre Machard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://debian.org
GPG: 1024D/23706F87 : B906 A53F 84E0 49B6 6CF7 82C2 B3A0 2D66 2370 6F87



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processing of xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.changes

2005-09-29 Thread Archive Administrator
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
  xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
  xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
  xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2005-09-29 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 324628 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Clarify

2005-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 291715 xt-aterm: does not work on 64-bit architectures
Bug#291715: xt-aterm_2.0.5-1(ia64/unstable): FTBFS: debian/rules issues?
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#324628: marked as done (xt-sdf2: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: static declaration of 'hash_table' follows non-static declaration)

2005-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324628: fixed in xt-sdf2 2.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 05:12:52 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 22 22:12:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (frobnitz.homelinux.net) [67.188.213.204] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7R5f-0005Q3-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:51 -0700
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7R5Y-0005zF-Ez
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:45 -0700
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xt-sdf2: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: static declaration of 'hash_table' 
follows non-static declaration
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:39 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: xt-sdf2
Severity: serious
Version: 2.0.1-3

>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:

...
gcc -I/usr/include/xt-aterm  -DPACKAGE=\"toolbuslib\" -DVERSION=\"0.5.1\" 
-DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_STRDUP=1  -I. -I.  -I.-Wall -g -O2 -c symbol.c
symbol.c:44: error: static declaration of 'hash_table' follows non-static 
declaration
symbol.h:53: error: previous declaration of 'hash_table' was here
symbol.c:45: error: static declaration of 'idx_table' follows non-static 
declaration
symbol.h:54: error: previous declaration of 'idx_table' was here
make[4]: *** [symbol.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory 
`/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1/pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib/libtb'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1/pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib'
make[2]: *** [pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib.dummy] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 324628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 14:18:38 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:18:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKzDh-0005ZC-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324628: fixed in xt-sdf2 2.0.1-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: xt-sdf2
Source-Version: 2.0.1-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xt-sdf2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xt-s

Bug#330760: php4-imagick: [INTL:sv] Swedish debconf templates translation

2005-09-29 Thread Daniel Nylander
Package: php4-imagick
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.13.2
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
# Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
# documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
# this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
# Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
# /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
# Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
# , fuzzy
# 
# 
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: php4-imagick 0.9.11-2\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2004-08-07 18:43+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2005-09-29 18:58-0700\n"
"Last-Translator: Daniel Nylander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Swedish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../php4-imagick.templates:4
msgid "Should ${extname} be added to /etc/php4/${sapiconfig}/php.ini?"
msgstr "Ska ${extname} läggas till i /etc/php4/${sapiconfig}/php.ini?"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../php4-imagick.templates:4
msgid ""
"You are installing ${extname} support for php4, and it is not yet enabled in "
"the configuration for the ${sapiconfig} SAPI.  Do you want this extension to "
"be enabled now?"
msgstr ""
"Du installerar ${extname} stöd för php4 och den är ännu inte aktiverad i 
konfigurationen för ${sapiconfig} SAPI.  Vill du aktivera den nu?"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../php4-imagick.templates:12
msgid "Should ${extname} be removed from /etc/php4/${sapiconfig}/php.ini?"
msgstr "Ska ${extname} raderas från /etc/php4/${sapiconfig}/php.ini?"

#. Type: boolean
#. Description
#: ../php4-imagick.templates:12
msgid ""
"You are removing ${extname} support for php4, but it is still enabled in the "
"configuration for the ${sapiconfig} SAPI.  Leaving this in place will "
"probably cause problems when trying to use PHP."
msgstr ""
"Du tar bort ${extname} stödet för php4 och den är fortfarande aktiverad i 
konfigurationen för ${sapiconfig} SAPI.  Lämna den aktiverad kan skapa problem 
när du använder PHP."



Processed: Clarify

2005-09-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> retitle 330603 gbatnav: FTBFS: missing automake1.9 dep, GNOME1 currently FUBAR
Bug#330603: gbatnav: ftbfs [sparc] /bin/sh: ../depcomp: No such file or 
directory
Changed Bug title.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#330802: dict-freedict: language spoken in the netherlands is called "Dutch", not Ne{d,th}erlands

2005-09-29 Thread Joost van Baal
Package: dict-freedict
Severity: minor
Version: 1.2-1

Hi Kęstutis,

dict-freedict 1.2-1 has in debian/control (both short and long
descriptions) stuff like:

  Dict package for German-Nederland Freedict dictionary
  Dict package for English-Netherlands Freedict dictionary
  Dict package for French-Nederlands Freedict dictionary
  Dict package for Nederlands-German Freedict dictionary
  Dict package for Nederlands-English Freedict dictionary
  Dict package for Nederlands-French Freedict dictionary

The English word for the language spoken in The Netherlands is "Dutch".
So it should be German-Dutch, English-Dutch, etc.

Thanks, Bye,

Joost



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processing of zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1_m68k.changes

2005-09-29 Thread Archive Administrator
zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1.dsc
  zorroutils_0.04+20021014.orig.tar.gz
  zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1.diff.gz
  zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1_m68k.deb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1_m68k.changes ACCEPTED

2005-09-29 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/z/zorroutils/zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1.diff.gz
zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1.dsc
  to pool/main/z/zorroutils/zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1.dsc
zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1_m68k.deb
  to pool/main/z/zorroutils/zorroutils_0.04+20021014-1_m68k.deb
zorroutils_0.04+20021014.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/z/zorroutils/zorroutils_0.04+20021014.orig.tar.gz
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



gkdial sparc build needs requeued

2005-09-29 Thread Blars Blarson
gkdial failed to build on a sparc buildd due to temporarily
unavailable build dependancies.  It has built on my sparc pbuilder.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]