Your message dated Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324628: fixed in xt-sdf2 2.0.1-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2005 05:12:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 22 22:12:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (frobnitz.homelinux.net) [67.188.213.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E7R5f-0005Q3-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:51 -0700
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E7R5Y-0005zF-Ez
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:45 -0700
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xt-sdf2: FTBFS with gcc-4.0: static declaration of 'hash_table'
follows non-static declaration
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:12:39 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: xt-sdf2
Severity: serious
Version: 2.0.1-3
>From my build log, using pbuilder in an i386 chroot:
...
gcc -I/usr/include/xt-aterm -DPACKAGE=\"toolbuslib\" -DVERSION=\"0.5.1\"
-DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_STRDUP=1 -I. -I. -I. -Wall -g -O2 -c symbol.c
symbol.c:44: error: static declaration of 'hash_table' follows non-static
declaration
symbol.h:53: error: previous declaration of 'hash_table' was here
symbol.c:45: error: static declaration of 'idx_table' follows non-static
declaration
symbol.h:54: error: previous declaration of 'idx_table' was here
make[4]: *** [symbol.o] Error 1
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1/pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib/libtb'
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1/pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib'
make[2]: *** [pre-pkgs/build/toolbuslib.dummy] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/xt-sdf2-2.0.1'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_US.UTF-8)
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324628-close) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Sep 2005 14:18:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 29 07:18:38 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EKzDh-0005ZC-00; Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324628: fixed in xt-sdf2 2.0.1-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:17:09 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: xt-sdf2
Source-Version: 2.0.1-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xt-sdf2, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xt-sdf2/xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xt-sdf2 package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 16:03:07 +0200
Source: xt-sdf2
Binary: xt-sdf2 xt-sdf2-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0.1-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xt-sdf2 - Programmers tools for manipulating SDF2 formalism
xt-sdf2-dev - Development headers and Libraries for xt-sdf2
Closes: 324628
Changes:
xt-sdf2 (2.0.1-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* gcc-4.0.dpatch: Fix name clashes between static and non-static
variables. Closes: #324628.
* debian/control: Unfold Build-Depends field into a single line to
placate Lintian.
* debian/watch: Add.
Files:
ca351a1ec327b2b7f909210fdefbfce3 718 devel optional xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.dsc
bed6d947a50daade6c95b4ad70bcdd53 12219 devel optional xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4.diff.gz
b4488b2a146c3f2e613f568750e21db3 2168470 devel optional
xt-sdf2_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
260242dafa0f13961a2195176a6587f3 639686 devel optional
xt-sdf2-dev_2.0.1-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDO/UbxBYivKllgY8RApqAAKCvt4GORZ5Em/8Y46QsOl/c5jxAVgCfcI7z
cGSyv5qGpGAIKIAl3pmdUh4=
=d+Z9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
