Processing of libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1_i386.changes
libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1.dsc libapache-filter-perl_1.023.orig.tar.gz libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1.diff.gz libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1.diff.gz to pool/main/liba/libapache-filter-perl/libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1.diff.gz libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1.dsc to pool/main/liba/libapache-filter-perl/libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1.dsc libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1_all.deb to pool/main/liba/libapache-filter-perl/libapache-filter-perl_1.023-1_all.deb libapache-filter-perl_1.023.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/liba/libapache-filter-perl/libapache-filter-perl_1.023.orig.tar.gz Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#254436: marked as done (/usr/lib/mime/packages/xmms: Wanted: Lower MIME priority for playing simple sound formats with XMMS)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#254436: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2004 19:23:34 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jun 14 12:23:34 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from av5-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.113] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BZx3O-0001Rd-00; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:23:34 -0700 Received: by av5-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id EA6CC37F46; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:23:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.93]) by av5-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D4737E51; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:23:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (h221n1fls307o1034.telia.com [81.226.172.221]) by smtp4-2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB6337E46; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 21:23:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from johan by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BZFRW-00039V-00; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:49:34 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: /usr/lib/mime/packages/xmms: Wanted: Lower MIME priority for playing simple sound formats with XMMS X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:49:29 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Johan Walles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xmms Version: 1.2.10-1 Severity: wishlist File: /usr/lib/mime/packages/xmms Since IMO XMMS is often over-kill for playing simple sounds like wav-files, I'd appreciate if "priority=3" was added to the audio/x-wav line in /usr/lib/mime/packages/xmms. The default priority is 5, lower is less important. More info available on the update-mime man page. This change would give xmms a two notch penalty relative to other players that may be more suited to playing simple sounds. That would in turn save me a lot of frustration when accessing my mailblocks.com account, so this change would be much appreciated by me. See also bug 244335. Thanks //Johan -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-686 Locale: LANG=sv_SE, LC_CTYPE=sv_SE Versions of packages xmms depends on: ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.21.2.10-9 The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.2 1.2.10-16 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm64.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi64.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System Input extension li ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-1 X Window System client libraries m -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 254436-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 21:23:36 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 14:23:36 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH6XD-0008UH-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700 From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#254436: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Source: xmms Source-Vers
Bug#292878: marked as done (xmms: Please make "Debian skin" the default skin (or at least package it))
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:16 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#292878: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jan 2005 19:52:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 30 11:52:04 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from sanctuaire.net (aldebaran.inside.sanctuaire.net) [62.212.111.178] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1CvL75-0001Ht-00; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:52:04 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldebaran.inside.sanctuaire.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB20FA88; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:51:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from aldebaran.inside.sanctuaire.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aldebaran [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16828-03; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:51:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from arche.inside.sanctuaire.net (arche.inside.sanctuaire.net [192.168.1.100]) by aldebaran.inside.sanctuaire.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD478FA82; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:51:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by arche.inside.sanctuaire.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0445DDD7E; Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:51:26 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Raphael HALIMI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xmms: Please make "Debian skin" the default skin (or at least package it) X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2 Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:51:26 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (Debian GNU/Linux) at mail.sanctuaire.net Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: xmms Version: 1.2.10-2 Severity: wishlist Package beep-media-player has a Debian skin as default skin. It's compatible with XMMS and it's quite nice and clear. Making it the default skin for XMMS would also close bug #257010 ; but if you don't want to make it the default skin, packaging it in xmms-skins would also be nice. Thanks for reading. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-k7 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages xmms depends on: ii libc62.3.2.ds1-20GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libglib1.2 1.2.10-9The GLib library of C routines ii libgtk1.21.2.10-17 The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxi6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Input extension li ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 292878-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 21:23:39 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 14:23:39 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH6XE-0008UL-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:16 -0700 From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#292878: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:16 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: xmms Source-Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xmms-dev_1.2.10+cvs20050809
Bug#257010: marked as done (xmms: Default skin is user-hostile )
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#257010: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 13:15:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 30 06:15:20 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from rhols66.adsl.netsonic.fi (there.afraid.org) [194.29.198.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bfevo-0002GX-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:15:20 -0700 Received: by there.afraid.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E642D15AA6F; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:19:49 +0300 (EEST) To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: xmms: Default skin is user-hostile X-Debbugs-CC: era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:19:49 +0300 (EEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE, X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: xmms Version: 1.2.10-1 Severity: wishlist The "none" skin which XMMS displays by default is virtually unusable for me, and I have reasonably good eyesight. I'm sure it's very "cool" to emulate a low-contrast blue LED on black plastic in an obscure lounge, but for those of us who just want to see the name of the song we're listening to occasionally, and not be particularly cool, it would be very useful indeed to include a different skin, perhaps as an alternative, in the base package. I'm aware of xmms-skins and am personally using a skin from that add-on package, but I wouldn't bet a naive user would even understand the meaning of "skin", and if you don't have any alternative skins installed, they're not going to find out by playing around. Only two of the alternatives in xmms-skins have a reasonable contrast (specifically, Helix-Sawfish and minEguE) and it could be better still -- a trivial black on white skin should be fairly simple to hack up and not take a lot of room in the package. I guess technical constraints prevent skins from using proper case instead of HIDEOUS UPPER CASE in the song title when XMMS is minimized so I won't bother to issue a separate bug report about that ... Thanks for considering this, /* era */ -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Kernel Version: Linux back 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i586 unknown --- Received: (at 257010-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 21:23:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 14:23:02 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EH6XD-0008UJ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700 From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#257010: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2 Source: xmms Source-Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of xmms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: xmms-dev_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms-dev_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.diff.gz to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.diff.gz xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.dsc to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.dsc xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated
Bug#328727: Fwd: Re: Bug#328727: xmms freezes on the desktop
Forwarding this follow-up to the bug report in question. Good luck! Cheers, Christopher Martin -- Forwarded Message -- Subject: Re: Bug#328727: xmms freezes on the desktop Date: September 18, 2005 20:08 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christopher Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Chris, My XMMS is a new install. Since I sent in the bug, I have managed to invoke XMMS as a plug-in in Konqueror by clicking on the "listen" button on various Shoutcast streams. XMMS takes about 1 to 2 minutes to automatically connect to the shoutcast server at which point it plays normally provided one does not click on the "play" button in the XMMS skin. If "play" is clicked, XMMS shuts down. Bug report # 191536 on XMMS mentioned XMMS freezing when "play" is clicked. So far, all I have tested is XMMS on streaming audio. Haven't tried it on a cd yet or playlists. Might be just a quirk of 64 bit "sarge" installation. Trying out Debian for the first time on a new machine so still learning the ropes. Along with SuSE, Debian is a great o/s. The less said about Windows XP Home Edition, the better. Regards, Felix B On Saturday 17 September 2005 08:48, you wrote: > severity 328727 important > tags 328727 unreproducible > stop > > On September 16, 2005 19:00, fb wrote: > > Package: xmms > > Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050209-2 > > Severity: grave > > Justification: renders package unusable > > > > xmms when opened as an application, immediately crashes and ceases to > > function. Clicking the "play" applet in xmms, causes xmms to freeze to > > the desktop after which xkill must be invoked to delete xmms from the > > desktop. > > I can't reproduce the problem here. Could you provide more information? > The incoming maintainer will likely need more data to investigate > properly. Did XMMS just cease functioning one day, or did you just > install it? If you launch XMMS from a console, what errors appears on the > console when it crashes? If you upgrade to the package in Sid, does the > problem change? > > Cheers, > Christopher Martin --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#66140: marked as done (E: xmms: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/xmms/Input/libmpg123.so)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:43:41 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Done has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2000 18:55:27 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 23 13:55:27 2000 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from va.debian.org [198.186.203.20] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian)) id 135Ybv-0002ZW-00; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 13:55:27 -0500 Received: from cibalia.gkvk.hr [161.53.211.3] (mail) by va.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 135WdB-0006il-00; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:48:41 -0700 Received: from joy by cibalia.gkvk.hr with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 135WE6-0002rQ-00; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:22:42 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 18:22:41 +0200 From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org Subject: E: xmms: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/xmms/Input/libmpg123.so Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: xmms Lintian generates this error for my xmms package: E: xmms: shlib-with-non-pic-code usr/lib/xmms/Input/libmpg123.so Now, I don't think I understand why. Apparently, this plugin is compiled with -fPIC all the way, as the attached build log clearly shows. The Lintian check seems to parse the output of this: objdump -hpT libmpg123.so For this Perl regexp: (/^\s+\d+\s+\.rela?\.text/o), and that (I guess) gives this (as of xmms 1.2.1-2): 3378 ld .rel.text I'll blindly believe that the check is okay, since that plugin, unlike others, has this: TEXTREL 0x0 I was told to grep for the rel.txt in the object files, but... [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deb/xm/xmms-1.2.1/Input/mpg123]% objdump -hp *.lo | egrep 'rela?\.text' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/deb/xm/xmms-1.2.1/Input/mpg123]% ...nothing. Maybe it's pulling in that thing through some other library it links with? % for k in $(for j in $(for i in -lgtk -lgdk -lgmodule -lgthread -lglib -lpthread -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm -lpthread; do d=lib`echo $i | sed s/-l//`.so; echo $d; done); do locate /$j | egrep -v '.so.|libc1'; done); do objdump -hpT $k | egrep 'rela?\.text' && echo " ^^ $i"; done % [yes, i know that was sick and ugly and pointless :)] All of the .lo files are "LSB relocatable" and the resulting libmp123.so is "LSB shared object", which should mean that the -fPIC setting is working. There haven't been any problems reported with the package due to this. Yet. Any kind soul who understands shared libraries better, please help. -- Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification --- Received: (at 66140-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 02:44:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 19:44:14 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from ns3.jiffynet-hosting.net (server146.jiffynet-hosting.net) [69.57.162.87] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHBdd-8V-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 19:44:14 -0700 Received: from dsl-201-129-37-187.prod-infinitum.com.mx ([201.129.37.187] helo=[192.168.1.50]) by server146.jiffynet-hosting.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EHBdQ-0007YS-01 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 22:44:05 -0400 Subject: Done From: David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:43:41 -0500 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server146.jiffynet-hosting.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - bugs.debian.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - debian.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,ONEWORD autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 This bug is not present anymore with current version of the xmms package. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
Bug#140578: marked as done (noteedit: SIGSEV on startup on PPC)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#140578: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2002 12:59:54 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 30 06:59:54 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from dclient217-162-182-55.hispeed.ch (PowerMac) [217.162.182.55] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16rISY-0002vH-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 06:59:54 -0600 Received: from niklaus by PowerMac with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 16rISX-Cf-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:59:53 +0100 From: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: SIGSEV on startup on PPC X-Mailer: reportbug 1.48 Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 13:59:53 +0100 Reply-To: Niklaus Giger<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Niklaus Giger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "Reply-To" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: noteedit Version: 1.16.1-1.1 Severity: normal I just installed noteedit on a PowerMac B/W G3. Trying to start gives me a SIGSEV. Output of the backtrace is (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...0x0ea7b494 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #0 0x0ea7b494 in wait4 () from /lib/libc.so.6 #1 0x0ea7b448 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x0f6488a8 in KCrash::defaultCrashHandler () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3 #3 #4 0x0f5fd23c in KLocale::translate_priv () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3 #5 0x0f5fd1f0 in KLocale::translate_priv () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3 #6 0x0f608070 in i18n () from /usr/lib/libkdecore.so.3 #7 0x0ff7a4d0 in smallestRestFrm::smallestRestFrm () from /usr/lib/libnoteedit.so.1 #8 0x0ff3a508 in NMainFrameWidget::NMainFrameWidget () from /usr/lib/libnoteedit.so.1 #9 0x0ff49e44 in NMainWindow::NMainWindow () from /usr/lib/libnoteedit.so.1 #10 0x10001844 in main () #11 0x0e9efd30 in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 If you want I am willing to compile from source. Regards -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: powerpc Kernel: Linux PowerMac 2.4.18-newpmac #1 Thu Mar 14 22:44:49 EST 2002 ppc Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH Versions of packages noteedit depends on: ii kdelibs3 4:2.2.2-13 KDE core libraries (runtime files) ii libc6 2.2.5-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0 2.6.6.1-4 client library to control the FAM ii libjpeg62 6b-5 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG ii libpng2 1.0.12-3 PNG library - runtime ii libqt23:2.3.1-20 Qt GUI Library (runtime version). ii libstdc++2.10-glibc2.21:2.95.4-4 The GNU stdc++ library ii libtse3 0.1.2-3TSE3: portable sequencer engine in ii xlibs 4.1.0-14 X Window System client libraries ii zlib1g1:1.1.4-1 compression library - runtime --- Received: (at 140578-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:57 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:57 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NJ-00; S
Bug#300380: marked as done ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoteEdit 2.7.4])
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300380: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 12:17:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 04:17:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DCctL-0007f4-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 04:17:19 -0800 Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DCctK-0003fV-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:17:18 +0100 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:17:18 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoteEdit 2.7.4] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Severity: wishlist - Forwarded message from Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:58:31 +0100 From: Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NoteEdit 2.7.4 Resent-From: debian-qa-packages@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello to all! We're glad to inform you that the first version of NoteEdit released by a new developing team (http://noteedit.berlios.de) is ready. Since you are the official maintainers (according to apt-cache show noteedit) of the Debian package, we'd be interested if you could update the existing 2.7.1 version. Some major changes since the old 2.7.3 version include: - - rests can have fermatas - - many improvements in LilyPond export filter (many bugs squashed, 2.4.x syntax compatible, bar numbers printed in non-first voices, much nicer outlook of the file) - - added Slovenian translation - - many bugs and some startup crashes concerning ALSA fixed Best regards! ~ Matev?? Jekovec ~ NoteEdit development team -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCPBPnm1IQqmP8KVgRAo/YAJ9fBrUkILoqcf18ml0ElejLukgIngCdFovA z5WUmwQHwlBEmoj4+/LwpIg= =uBD9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - End forwarded message - -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 300380-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NP-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#300380: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appr
Bug#302917: marked as done (noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#302917: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 20:04:30 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 13:04:30 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from d028095.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [80.171.28.95] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DIBKg-0005Dy-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:04:30 -0700 Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DIBKh-0007dx-Ru; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:04:31 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): configure does not allow building with gcc-4.0 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:04:31 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: normal When building 'noteedit' on amd64/unstable with gcc-4.0, I get the following error: checking for dcopidl... /usr/bin/dcopidl checking for dcopidl2cpp... /usr/bin/dcopidl2cpp checking for mcopidl... /usr/bin/mcopidl checking for artsc-config... /usr/bin/artsc-config checking for kde-config... /usr/bin/kde-config checking for meinproc... /usr/bin/meinproc Testing compiler version ... 4 Cannot determine g++ version Check your compiler installation or try to find out why "./compvers" doesn't supply "2" or "3"! Please change the configure script to allow building with gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens --- Received: (at 302917-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NR-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#302917: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated noteedit package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 03:13:49 +0100 Source: noteedit Binary: noteedit noteedit-data Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 2.8.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: noteedit - KDE Music Editor noteedit-data - KDE Music Editor (data files) Closes: 140578 268206 299399 300380 302917 305091 308387 308387 313942 327587 327940 Changes: noteedit (2.8.0-1) unstable; urg
Bug#327587: marked as done (noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300380: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 08:51:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 01:51:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EENZ8-0001rZ-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:51:59 -0700 Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EENZ5-0006gi-4D; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:51:55 +0200 Received: from [129.240.122.93] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EENYz-0007mg-CT; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:51:49 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?q?Torquil_Macdonald_S=C3=B8rensen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:53:26 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.126, required 12, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL -1.31) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: wishlist Please upgrade to the new Noteedit version 2.8.0. The current version in debian unstable is uninstallable at the moment, anyhow. Best regards, TMS -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages noteedit depends on: pn kdelibs4 (no description available) ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgamin0 [libfam0c102] 0.1.5-2Client library for the gamin file ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime pn libqt3c102-mt (no description available) ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 pn libtse3-0.2.7 (no description available) ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra pn noteedit-data (no description available) ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime noteedit recommends no packages. --- Received: (at 300380-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NP-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#300380: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is
Bug#299399: marked as done (noteedit: Menu Icon please)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#299399: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Mar 2005 23:09:26 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 13 15:09:25 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from unassigned.tiscali.serverstream.net (raq550.glastonbury.co.uk) [213.232.90.61] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DAcD7-0003kp-00; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:09:25 -0800 Received: from Xingta.tim.gigl (38-24-55-213.adsl.realpoptel.net [213.55.24.38]) by virtualglastonbury.org.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j2DN5vc07311; Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:05:57 GMT Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: tim hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Menu Icon please X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8 Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:09:22 + X-GlastonburyOnline-MailScanner-Information: Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more information X-GlastonburyOnline-MailScanner: Found to be clean Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Version: 2.5.3-3 Severity: wishlist I notice that your application lacks an icon. For the Debian package please could you create a 32x32 pixel XPM in /usr/share/pixmaps/noteedit.xpm and reference it from /usr/lib/menu/noteedit by adding this: icon="/usr/share/pixmaps/noteedit.xpm" For more information, please refer to the updated Debian Policy: http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/ch3.html#s3.7 This will ensure that your nice icon shows up in most menus. If you're not graphically inclined, I'm prepared to create a suitable icon and submit a menufile patch into the bargain. Please email me with your requirements if this is the case. Thanks for taking the time to deal with this, and thanks for all the effort you have put in to maintaining great free software. tim hall AGNULA/DeMuDi menu monitor -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (101, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-1-multimedia-686 Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_GB) Versions of packages noteedit depends on: ii kdelibs44:3.2.3-2KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-22.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.demudi1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-6 client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-6GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.3.3-8Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-8The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtse3-0.2.7 0.2.7-4 TSE3: portable sequencer engine in ii libx11-64.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext64.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii noteedit-data 2.5.3-3 KDE Music Editor (data files) ii xlibs 4.3.0.dfsg.1-10 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-3compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 299399-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:21 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NN-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#299399: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender
Bug#305091: marked as done (noteedit: Upgrade to 2.7.4)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327587: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 21:43:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 14:43:55 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vsmtp1alice.tin.it [212.216.176.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DNHYY-0007hi-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:43:55 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (82.50.26.83) by vsmtp1alice.tin.it (7.0.027) id 425E31F500052DEB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:43:43 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Upgrade to 2.7.4 X-Debbugs-CC: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 XEmacs/21.4 (patch 17) (Jumbo Shrimp) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:43:49 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.4 required=4.0 tests=ADDR_FREE,BAYES_00, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Severity: wishlist Hi, is there any plan to package the new version of noteedit? http://developer.berlios.de/projects/noteedit Thanks, Free --- Received: (at 327587-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NZ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327587: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated noteedit package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 03:13:49 +0100 Source: noteedit Binary: noteedit noteedit-data Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 2.8.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: noteedit - KDE Music Editor noteedit-data - KDE Music Editor (data files) Closes: 140578 268206 299399 300380 302917 305091 308387 308387 313942 327587 327940 Changes: noteedit (2.8.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (closes: #327587) * Update qt/kde dependancies, simplified build-deps (closes: #327940) * Use --without-libs (disables tse3 to avoid crash) * Moved libnoteedit to /usr/lib/noteed
Bug#305091: marked as done (noteedit: Upgrade to 2.7.4)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#300380: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 21:43:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 14:43:55 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vsmtp1alice.tin.it [212.216.176.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DNHYY-0007hi-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:43:55 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (82.50.26.83) by vsmtp1alice.tin.it (7.0.027) id 425E31F500052DEB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:43:43 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Upgrade to 2.7.4 X-Debbugs-CC: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 XEmacs/21.4 (patch 17) (Jumbo Shrimp) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:43:49 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.4 required=4.0 tests=ADDR_FREE,BAYES_00, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Severity: wishlist Hi, is there any plan to package the new version of noteedit? http://developer.berlios.de/projects/noteedit Thanks, Free --- Received: (at 300380-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:20 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:20 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NP-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#300380: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated noteedit package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 03:13:49 +0100 Source: noteedit Binary: noteedit noteedit-data Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 2.8.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: noteedit - KDE Music Editor noteedit-data - KDE Music Editor (data files) Closes: 140578 268206 299399 300380 302917 305091 308387 308387 313942 327587 327940 Changes: noteedit (2.8.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (closes: #327587) * Update qt/kde dependancies, simplified build-deps (closes: #327940) * Use --without-libs (disables tse3 to avoid crash) * Moved libnoteedit to /usr/lib/noteedi
Bug#305091: marked as done (noteedit: Upgrade to 2.7.4)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305091: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Apr 2005 21:43:55 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 17 14:43:55 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from vsmtp1alice.tin.it [212.216.176.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DNHYY-0007hi-00; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 14:43:55 -0700 Received: from localhost.localdomain (82.50.26.83) by vsmtp1alice.tin.it (7.0.027) id 425E31F500052DEB for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:43:43 +0200 To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Upgrade to 2.7.4 X-Debbugs-CC: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Free Ekanayaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 XEmacs/21.4 (patch 17) (Jumbo Shrimp) (i386-debian-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 23:43:49 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.4 required=4.0 tests=ADDR_FREE,BAYES_00, HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Severity: wishlist Hi, is there any plan to package the new version of noteedit? http://developer.berlios.de/projects/noteedit Thanks, Free --- Received: (at 305091-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NT-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#305091: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated noteedit package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 03:13:49 +0100 Source: noteedit Binary: noteedit noteedit-data Architecture: source powerpc all Version: 2.8.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: noteedit - KDE Music Editor noteedit-data - KDE Music Editor (data files) Closes: 140578 268206 299399 300380 302917 305091 308387 308387 313942 327587 327940 Changes: noteedit (2.8.0-1) unstable; urgency=low . * New upstream release (closes: #327587) * Update qt/kde dependancies, simplified build-deps (closes: #327940) * Use --without-libs (disables tse3 to avoid crash) * Moved libnoteedit to /usr/lib/noteedi
Bug#313942: marked as done (noteedit: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#313942: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jun 2005 21:32:21 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 14 14:32:21 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp06.web.de [217.72.192.224] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DiJ1A-0005nj-00; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:32:20 -0700 Received: from [84.180.153.47] (helo=pluto.sol) by smtp06.web.de with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (WEB.DE 4.105 #291) id 1DiJ0e-0007U3-00 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:31:49 +0200 Received: from jens by pluto.sol with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DiIyA-00081u-Pv; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:29:14 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 23:29:14 +0200 From: Jens Seidel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: noteedit: [INTL:de] German PO file corrections Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_44,HAS_PACKAGE, HTML_10_20 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: minor Tags: patch l10n Hi, attached you will find an update of the German PO file de.po. Note that this is a semi automatic created mail which contains all issues I found during checking most of Debians German PO files. This includes also encoding but mostly typo fixes. Please contact upstream for non-native Debian packages to incorporate the changes (even if Debians version is old) since I noticed that the same errors are made again and again over all packages. Jens --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="de.po.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit --- de.po.gz.orig/noteedit_2.7.1-2_de.po2005-06-11 16:42:51.0 +0200 +++ de.po.gz/noteedit_2.7.1-2_de.po 2005-06-14 20:42:19.0 +0200 @@ -1,24 +1,3 @@ -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to -# translation of de.po to # translation of de.po to deutsch # Copyright (C) 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. # J. Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2003, 2004. @@ -650,7 +629,7 @@ "fileref=\"breve_oval.png\"/>. Das kann " "nach: MusiXTeX, MUP, " "LilyPond und ABC music " -"exportiert werden. Somit zeigt nur PMX ds kleine " +"exportiert werden. Somit zeigt nur PMX das kleine " "Rechteck: ." @@ -785,7 +764,7 @@ "Vorschlag/Nachschlag-Noten. Es Ãâ¬ndert die Balken sinnvoll. Deshalb sollten " "Sie als MUP Nutzer niemals Vorschlag/Nachschlag-" "Noten mit Balken produzieren! MUP kann nicht mit " -"Nachschlag-Noten umgehen. ¬eedit; gibt eine Warnung aus.Desweiteren " +"Nachschlag-Noten umgehen. ¬eedit; gibt eine Warnung aus. Desweiteren " "bietet MUP keinerlei Mittel an, mehrere mit einem Haltebogen versehene " "Vorschlagnoten zu spezifizieren. ¬eedit; gibt eine Warnung aus." @@ -1280,7 +1259,7 @@ "Sie können auch den Tastatureingabemodus durch DrÃÅcken des " "Tastatureingabeknopfes ( ) aktivieren. In " -"diesem Falle können Sie durch DrÃÅcken von Crtl(Strg)+Enter " +"diesem Falle können Sie durch DrÃÅcken von Strg+Enter " "eine Note zum Akkord hinzufÃÅgen." #. Tag: title @@ -1752,7 +1731,7 @@ "Bitte geben Sie den eingebauten Markierungen stets den Vorrang, so vorhanden! " "Zum Beispiel: Benutzen Sie das Text-Werkzeug niemals fÃÅr " "D. S. al Fine! Benutzen Sie stattdessen die
Bug#308387: marked as done (noteedit: Not compatible with current lilypond)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#308387: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 May 2005 22:22:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 09 15:22:22 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 213214142254.edelkey.net (finmatkosk2.fi.fujitsu.com) [213.214.142.254] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DVGdq-0005kA-00; Mon, 09 May 2005 15:22:22 -0700 Received: by finmatkosk2.fi.fujitsu.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F2E0634F; Tue, 10 May 2005 01:21:53 +0300 (EEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matti Koskimies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Not compatible with current lilypond X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11 Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 01:21:52 +0300 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: important Lilypond export of this version of Noteedit is not compatible with lilypond version 2.4.5 that comes with Debian unstable. I guess upgrading to version 2.7.4 from http://developer.berlios.de/projects/noteedit woud help. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) Versions of packages noteedit depends on: ii kdelibs4 4:3.3.2-5 KDE core libraries ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc62.3.2.ds1-21GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libfam0c102 2.7.0-6 client library to control the FAM ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library ii libice6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.13-1.0 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime ii libqt3c102-mt3:3.3.4-3 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v ii libsm6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-2 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 ii libtse3-0.2.70.2.7-5 TSE3: portable sequencer engine in ii libx11-6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 4.3.0.dfsg.1-12.0.1 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 0.8.3-7 X Rendering Extension client libra ii noteedit-data2.7.1-2 KDE Music Editor (data files) ii xlibs4.3.0.dfsg.1-12 X Keyboard Extension (XKB) configu ii zlib1g 1:1.2.2-4 compression library - runtime -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 308387-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NV-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#308387: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 6 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.d
Bug#327940: marked as done (noteedit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327940: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2005 23:47:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 12 16:47:52 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-66-144.onocable.ono.com (chistera.yi.org) [84.120.66.144] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EEy1g-0003Tk-00; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 16:47:52 -0700 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEy1d-0002TF-T0 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:50 +0200 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: noteedit: uninstallable; needs rebuild for the Qt/KDE transition Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:47:49 +0200 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS, HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: grave Tags: sid Hello, This is a grave bug filed against your package because it depends on libqt3c102-mt, which no longer exists, thus rendering yor package uninstallable in unstable. As part of the C++ ABI transition, this library has moved to the libqt3-mt package. Simply recompiling and uploading your package should be enough to fix this; as per this mail [1], you need not bump your Qt, kdelibs or aRts build-dependencies. Beware, though, that that may not be the case for all the involved librares. Also, make sure that you build the package in an up to date and clean sid environment, so that final dependencies are correct. Please do this as soon as possible in order to accelerate the Qt/KDE transition to testing. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/09/msg0.html Perhaps you find that your package fails to compile with gcc4. If that's the case, there's probably a bug about it in the BTS, and it may include a patch. If not (or if you have doubts about the correctness of the patch), you may be able to find a fix in upstream's CVS, or in the Ubuntu distribution. If your package fails only in arm, m68k, and hppa, see instructions in the above mail. Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your cooperation, and happy hacking! P.S.: There may be an already reported bug against this package for this very same reason. I've checked for that, and will be merging the bugs soon. The reason for still filing this bug was to have the opportunity of including the small bits of information above. I apologize for the inconvenience. --- Received: (at 327940-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:18 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:18 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003Nb-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327940: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 7 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz n
Bug#327587: marked as done (noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305091: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 08:51:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 01:51:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EENZ8-0001rZ-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:51:59 -0700 Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EENZ5-0006gi-4D; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:51:55 +0200 Received: from [129.240.122.93] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EENYz-0007mg-CT; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:51:49 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?q?Torquil_Macdonald_S=C3=B8rensen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:53:26 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.126, required 12, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL -1.31) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: wishlist Please upgrade to the new Noteedit version 2.8.0. The current version in debian unstable is uninstallable at the moment, anyhow. Best regards, TMS -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages noteedit depends on: pn kdelibs4 (no description available) ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgamin0 [libfam0c102] 0.1.5-2Client library for the gamin file ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime pn libqt3c102-mt (no description available) ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 pn libtse3-0.2.7 (no description available) ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra pn noteedit-data (no description available) ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime noteedit recommends no packages. --- Received: (at 305091-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NT-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#305091: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is
Bug#300380: marked as done ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoteEdit 2.7.4])
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327587: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 12:17:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 04:17:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DCctL-0007f4-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 04:17:19 -0800 Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DCctK-0003fV-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:17:18 +0100 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:17:18 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoteEdit 2.7.4] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Severity: wishlist - Forwarded message from Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:58:31 +0100 From: Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NoteEdit 2.7.4 Resent-From: debian-qa-packages@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello to all! We're glad to inform you that the first version of NoteEdit released by a new developing team (http://noteedit.berlios.de) is ready. Since you are the official maintainers (according to apt-cache show noteedit) of the Debian package, we'd be interested if you could update the existing 2.7.1 version. Some major changes since the old 2.7.3 version include: - - rests can have fermatas - - many improvements in LilyPond export filter (many bugs squashed, 2.4.x syntax compatible, bar numbers printed in non-first voices, much nicer outlook of the file) - - added Slovenian translation - - many bugs and some startup crashes concerning ALSA fixed Best regards! ~ Matev?? Jekovec ~ NoteEdit development team -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCPBPnm1IQqmP8KVgRAo/YAJ9fBrUkILoqcf18ml0ElejLukgIngCdFovA z5WUmwQHwlBEmoj4+/LwpIg= =uBD9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - End forwarded message - -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 327587-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NZ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327587: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if app
Bug#300380: marked as done ([EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoteEdit 2.7.4])
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#305091: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2005 12:17:22 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Mar 19 04:17:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1DCctL-0007f4-00; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 04:17:19 -0800 Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1DCctK-0003fV-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:17:18 +0100 Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:17:18 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: NoteEdit 2.7.4] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-Spam-Level: Package: noteedit Severity: wishlist - Forwarded message from Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:58:31 +0100 From: Matevz Jekovec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NoteEdit 2.7.4 Resent-From: debian-qa-packages@lists.debian.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello to all! We're glad to inform you that the first version of NoteEdit released by a new developing team (http://noteedit.berlios.de) is ready. Since you are the official maintainers (according to apt-cache show noteedit) of the Debian package, we'd be interested if you could update the existing 2.7.1 version. Some major changes since the old 2.7.3 version include: - - rests can have fermatas - - many improvements in LilyPond export filter (many bugs squashed, 2.4.x syntax compatible, bar numbers printed in non-first voices, much nicer outlook of the file) - - added Slovenian translation - - many bugs and some startup crashes concerning ALSA fixed Best regards! ~ Matev?? Jekovec ~ NoteEdit development team -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCPBPnm1IQqmP8KVgRAo/YAJ9fBrUkILoqcf18ml0ElejLukgIngCdFovA z5WUmwQHwlBEmoj4+/LwpIg= =uBD9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- - End forwarded message - -- Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357) http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl --- Received: (at 305091-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:19 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:19 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NT-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#305091: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of noteedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit-data_2.8.0-1_all.deb noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.diff.gz noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1.dsc noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0-1_powerpc.deb noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz to pool/main/n/noteedit/noteedit_2.8.0.orig.tar.gz A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appr
Bug#327587: marked as done (noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0)
Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#327587: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Sep 2005 08:51:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 11 01:51:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EENZ8-0001rZ-00; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 01:51:59 -0700 Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EENZ5-0006gi-4D; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:51:55 +0200 Received: from [129.240.122.93] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EENYz-0007mg-CT; Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:51:49 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?utf-8?q?Torquil_Macdonald_S=C3=B8rensen?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: noteedit: Upgrade to Noteedit 2.8.0 X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17 Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 10:53:26 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.126, required 12, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL -1.31) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: noteedit Version: 2.7.1-2 Severity: wishlist Please upgrade to the new Noteedit version 2.8.0. The current version in debian unstable is uninstallable at the moment, anyhow. Best regards, TMS -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-k7 Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Versions of packages noteedit depends on: pn kdelibs4 (no description available) ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.17-1 Library of functions for 2D graphi ii libc6 2.3.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libgamin0 [libfam0c102] 0.1.5-2Client library for the gamin file ii libgcc1 1:4.0.1-6 GCC support library ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 Inter-Client Exchange library ii libidn11 0.5.18-1 GNU libidn library, implementation ii libpng12-01.2.8rel-1 PNG library - runtime pn libqt3c102-mt (no description available) ii libsm66.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System Session Management ii libstdc++51:3.3.6-9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 pn libtse3-0.2.7 (no description available) ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System protocol client li ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System miscellaneous exte ii libxrender1 1:0.9.0-2 X Rendering Extension client libra pn noteedit-data (no description available) ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-6 X Window System client libraries m ii zlib1g1:1.2.3-4 compression library - runtime noteedit recommends no packages. --- Received: (at 327587-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Sep 2005 04:18:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 18 21:18:59 2005 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian)) id 1EHD5U-0003NZ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 From: Paul Brossier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $ Subject: Bug#327587: fixed in noteedit 2.8.0-1 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 21:17:04 -0700 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10 Source: noteedit Source-Version: 2.8.0-1 We believe that the bug you reported is
Bug#121201: sexy date site that doesn't costs a dime
Yo pal You'll never guess what happened to me on sunday. Basically found horny date site that doesn't costs a dime. So many females are there messaging and meeting eachother. And I think there is someone (or more than one) for you. Although most of them want one-nighters, there are also those who like it serious. this message is for confirmation ;~) http://www.zoozits.com/extra/greatdating/ PS:no.more? http://www.zoozits.com/extra/greatdating/getmeoff.php -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
