Bug#101199: marked as done (diskless-newhost: should propose "Diff" when considering replacing file on upgrade)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2001 13:09:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jun 17 08:09:21 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtprt15.wanadoo.fr [:::193.252.19.210] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15BcIr-0006P8-00; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 08:09:21 -0500
Received: from mahonia.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.58) by smtprt15.wanadoo.fr; 17 
Jun 2001 15:09:16 +0200
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (62.161.79.249) by mahonia.wanadoo.fr; 17 
Jun 2001 15:09:09 +0200
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 15Bce8-xf-00; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:31:20 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless-newhost: should propose "Diff" when considering replacing 
file on upgrade
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.17
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.17
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:31:19 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.12
Severity: wishlist

Like when dpkg presents a new conffile for replacement, allowing the
user to get a diff would help decision.

Maybe a "Merge" option using "sdiff -o" would be nice as well.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.2.19lvm+reiserfs+ide #1 Thu Jun 14 02:34:11 CEST 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=français, LC_CTYPE=français

Versions of packages diskless depends on:
ii  libdigest-md5-perl2.13-2 MD5 Message Digest for Perl   
ii  m41.4-13 a macro processing language   
ii  perl [perl5]  5.6.1-4Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 


---
Received: (at 101199-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#107702: marked as done (diskless-image-secure: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2001 02:58:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 05 21:58:01 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from root by master.debian.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Taaf-0002Ct-03; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:58:01 -0500
Received: from (foo) [200.171.6.135] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15TYgb-000848-00; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 19:56:02 -0500
Received: by foo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5D3854EB33; Sun,  5 Aug 2001 04:02:13 -0300 (BRT)
From: Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless-image-secure: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template 
translation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun,  5 Aug 2001 04:02:13 -0300 (BRT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless-image-secure
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist

Here's pt_BR translation for diskless-image-secure's debconf template :

==

Template: diskless-image/master
Type: string
Default: master
Description: Name of master?
 This option specifies the default name for the master host. This
 is required to be setup by some debian packages. It should have
 an entry in the DNS.
Description-pt_BR: Nome do master ?
 Esta opção especifica o nome padrão do master host. Isto é requerido
 para ser configurado por alguns pacotes debian e deverá possuir uma
 entrada no DNS.

Template: diskless-image/nfsserver
Type: string
Default: 192.168.87.129
Description: NFS server address?
 This specifies the address of the central NFS server where to mount
 partitions from on the clients. It is recommended that this
 contain the IP address, although this is not required.
Description-pt_BR: Endereço do servidor NFS ?
 Isto especifica o endereço do servidor NFS central a partir de onde
 montar partições nos clientes. É recomendado que este contenha o
 endereço IP, porém não é requerido.

Template: diskless-image/nfsimagedir
Type: string
Default: /var/lib/diskless/default/root
Description: NFS image directory mount point?
 This options specifies the path which will be used by the clients
 to mount the NFS image directory.
Description-pt_BR: Ponto de montagem da imagem do diretório NFS ?
 Esta opção especifica o caminho que será usado pelos clientes para
 montar a imagem do diretório NFS.

Template: diskless-image/nfshostsdir
Type: string
Default: /var/lib/diskless/default
Description: Hosts' directories mount point?
 This options specifies the path which will be used by the clients
 to their private read-write directories.  The IP address
 will be appended to the end of this path.
Description-pt_BR: Ponto de montagem dos diretórios dos hosts ?
 Esta opção especifica o caminho que será usado pelos clientes para
 seus diretórios de escrita-leitura particular. O endereço IP será
 incluído ao final desse caminho.

Template: diskless-image/nfshomedir
Type: string
Default: /home
Description: NFS exported home directories?
 This specifies where /home on the clients should be mounted from your
 NFS server. Examples are /home, /tftpboot/home, etc. This directory must
 be exported on your NFS server via /etc/exports, and will be mounted as
 /home. Set this value to "none", if you don't want to mount /home (in
 this case, /home will be an empty read-only directory).
Description-pt_BR: Diretórios home exportados por NFS ?
 Isto especifica onde o /home nos clientes deverá ser montado a partir de
 seu servidor NFS. Exemplos são /home, /tftpboot/home, etc. Este diretório
 deve ser exportado em seu servidor NFS via /etc/exports e será montado
 como /home. Defina este valor para "none" se você não quer montar o /home
 (neste caso, o /home será um diretório somente-leitura vazio).

Template: diskless-image/nameserver
Type: string
Default: 127.0.0.1
Description: IP address of nameserver?
 This option specifies the default nameserver for each client in
 this group.
Description-pt_BR: Endereço IP do servidor de nomes ?
 Esta opção especifica o servidor de nomes padrão para cada cliente
 neste grupo.

Template: diskless-image/domain
Type: string
Default: chocbit.org.au
Description: Domain?
 This option specifies the default DNS domain for each client in
 this group.
Description-pt_B

Bug#107721: marked as done (diskless-image-simple: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2001 02:59:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 05 21:59:02 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from root by master.debian.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Taag-0002Ct-0I; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 21:58:02 -0500
Received: from (foo) [200.171.6.135] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15TYts-0001o5-00; Sun, 05 Aug 2001 20:09:45 -0500
Received: by foo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BE0524EB33; Sun,  5 Aug 2001 04:15:52 -0300 (BRT)
From: Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless-image-simple: Brazilian portuguese (pt_BR) debconf template 
translation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun,  5 Aug 2001 04:15:52 -0300 (BRT)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless-image-simple
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist

Here's pt_BR translation for diskless-image-simple's debconf template :

==

Template: diskless-image/master
Type: string
Default: master
Description: Name of master?
 This option specifies the default name for the master host. This
 is required to be setup by some debian packages. It should have
 an entry in the DNS.
Description-pt_BR: Nome do master ?
 Esta opção especifica o nome padrão do master host. Isto é requerido
 para ser configurado por alguns pacotes debian e deverá possuir uma
 entrada no DNS.

Template: diskless-image/nfsserver
Type: string
Default: 192.168.87.129
Description: NFS server address?
 This specifies the address of the central NFS server where to mount
 partitions from on the clients. It is recommended that this
 contain the IP address, although this is not required.
Description-pt_BR: Endereço do servidor NFS ?
 Isto especifica o endereço do servidor NFS central a partir de onde
 montar partições nos clientes. É recomendado que este contenha o
 endereço IP, porém não é requerido.

Template: diskless-image/nfsimagedir
Type: string
Default: /var/lib/diskless/default/root
Description: NFS image directory mount point?
 This options specifies the path which will be used by the clients
 to mount the NFS image directory.
Description-pt_BR: Ponto de montagem da imagem do diretório NFS ?
 Esta opção especifica o caminho que será usado pelos clientes para
 montar a imagem do diretório NFS.

Template: diskless-image/nfshostsdir
Type: string
Default: /var/lib/diskless/default
Description: Hosts' directories mount point?
 This options specifies the path which will be used by the clients
 to their private read-write directories.  The IP address
 will be appended to the end of this path.
Description-pt_BR: Ponto de montagem dos diretórios dos hosts ?
 Esta opção especifica o caminho que será usado pelos clientes para
 seus diretórios de escrita-leitura particular. O endereço IP será
 incluído ao final desse caminho.

Template: diskless-image/nfshomedir
Type: string
Default: /home
Description: NFS exported home directories?
 This specifies where /home on the clients should be mounted from your
 NFS server. Examples are /home, /tftpboot/home, etc. This directory must
 be exported on your NFS server via /etc/exports, and will be mounted as
 /home. Set this value to "none", if you don't want to mount /home (in
 this case, /home will be an empty read-only directory).
Description-pt_BR: Diretórios home exportados por NFS ?
 Isto especifica onde o /home nos clientes deverá ser montado a partir de
 seu servidor NFS. Exemplos são /home, /tftpboot/home, etc. Este diretório
 deve ser exportado em seu servidor NFS via /etc/exports e será montado
 como /home. Defina este valor para "none" se você não quer montar o /home
 (neste caso, o /home será um diretório somente-leitura vazio).

Template: diskless-image/nameserver
Type: string
Default: 127.0.0.1
Description: IP address of nameserver?
 This option specifies the default nameserver for each client in
 this group.
Description-pt_BR: Endereço IP do servidor de nomes ?
 Esta opção especifica o servidor de nomes padrão para cada cliente
 neste grupo.

Template: diskless-image/domain
Type: string
Default: chocbit.org.au
Description: Domain?
 This option specifies the default DNS domain for each client in
 this group.
Description-pt_B

Bug#254116: marked as done (diskless: Please include attached Brazilian Portuguese debconf template translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2004 01:32:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 12 18:32:24 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 200-171-6-135.dsl.telesp.net.br (foolish.homelab.net) 
[200.171.6.135] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BZJrD-00013k-00; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:32:23 -0700
Received: by foolish.homelab.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9356D43E7D; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:33:33 -0300 (BRT)
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0184301851=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Andre Luis Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: Please include attached Brazilian Portuguese debconf template
 translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.61
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 22:33:33 -0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0184301851==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: diskless
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch sid l10n


Hello,

Please consider including the attached Brazilian Portuguese (pt_BR)
debconf template translation before uploading the next Debian's diskless
package.

Regards,


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.6
Locale: LANG=pt_BR, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR (ignored: LC_ALL set to pt_BR)

--===0184301851==
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pt_BR.po.gz"
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Bug#144307: marked as done (diskless: /etc files with spaces constantly show up as changed)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Apr 2002 01:08:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 23 20:08:02 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from email.nist.gov [129.6.2.7] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 170BGL-00021D-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:08:01 -0500
Received: from lurch.nist.gov (lurch.nist.gov [129.6.153.40])
by email.nist.gov (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3O180vU022786
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:08:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ruth.nist.gov (ruth.nist.gov [129.6.153.93])
by lurch.nist.gov (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA21794;
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:08:07 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: by ruth.nist.gov (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 23 Apr 2002 
21:08:07 -0400
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:08:07 -0400
From: Andy Roosen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: /etc files with spaces constantly show up as changed
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.17
Severity: normal

There are a few files in /etc that may have a space in the file name
(I noticed it with '/etc/kde2/colors/40 Colors' from the kdelibs3 package
originally). Those files always show up as 'changed' if diskless-newhost
is rerun on an existing diskless machine.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux ruth 2.4.9-mosix #1 SMP Thu Sep 13 11:00:48 EDT 2001 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap0.1.17 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl2.02-2 backwards-compatible wrapper for Digest::MD5
ii  m4 1.4-14 a macro processing language
pn  telnet  (no description available)
^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5)

---
Received: (at 144307-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#138817: marked as done (diskless: eth0 hardcoded in /sbin/init replacement)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2002 00:07:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 17 18:07:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16mkgD-TB-00; Sun, 17 Mar 2002 18:07:13 -0600
Received: from fwd09.sul.t-online.de 
by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
id 16mjr5-0008WU-02; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:14:23 +0100
Received: from p508E8956.dip.t-dialin.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by 
fmrl09.sul.t-online.com
with esmtp id 16mjqv-06YhKiC; Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:14:13 +0100
Received: from goodvibes.webnet.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by p508E8956.dip.t-dialin.net (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) with ESMTP id 
g2HNDmss027335;
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:13:48 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by goodvibes.webnet.de (8.12.1/8.12.1/Debian -2) id g2HNDkKF027334;
Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:13:46 +0100
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:13:46 +0100
From: Michael Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: eth0 hardcoded in /sbin/init replacement
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.36
X-GPG-Fingerprint: F65C68CD: BF52 F4F7 5CAF 5349 1F47  A989 EA4A CD5C F65C 68CD
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1D0DD0B9: 3C B3 B4 96 2F 38 D8 F1  25 68 53 2B 4A 15 A5 87
X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.17
Severity: normal

Hi,

the diskless-image-* packages have eth0 hardcoded in /sbin/init, which
is a problem, if one wants to boot from eth1 :)


diskless-image-{simple,secure}/init:
IP=`ifconfig | grep -A1 eth0 | grep -v eth0 | sed 's/^.*inet 
addr:\([0-9\.]\+\).*$/\1/'`

The following snippet is more robust (and gives a better error message
in case it still fails).  The explicit test for an interface is not
needed, since at that point there should be only one interface up,
AFAICT (the one set up by the kernel).  In (the unlikely) case there
is another one up (say, if there are two, and for each a DHCP request
succeeds), the first one is taken here:

-
IP="$(ifconfig | sed -n -e '/^[[:space:]]*inet 
addr:\([[:digit:].]*\).*$/{s//\1/p;q;}')"
if [ -n "$IP" ]
then
echo "Client IP address is $IP"
else
echo "$0: could not determine IP address.  Bailing out."
exit 1
fi
-

I looked around for a better way to obtain the client's IP address,
but couldn't find one...

BTW: Is there a reason why *-secure/init and *-simple/init are not the
same?  It looks like they've gone out of sync at some point.


Cheers,
M/

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux goodvibes 2.4.16 #1 Sun Dec 9 14:40:03 CET 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=POSIX, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap   0.1.16.3   Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl   2.02-2 backwards-compatible wrapper for D
ii  m41.4-14 a macro processing language
ii  perl [perl5]  5.6.1-5Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

---
Received: (at 138817-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
 

Bug#158696: marked as done (diskless: [PATCH] use update-cluster to run diskless-newhost)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Aug 2002 00:06:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 28 19:06:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p4-117-1.mit.edu [18.53.1.61] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17kCpe-CS-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:06:43 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mit.edu)
by p4-117-1.mit.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17kCpa-0003mx-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:06:38 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 20:06:32 -0400
From: Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020622 
Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: [PATCH] use update-cluster to run diskless-newhost
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="03020203050003020507"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--03020203050003020507
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.17
Severity: wishlist

Greetings,

It's a bit of a pain to go around running diskless-newhost for every 
single host when setting up a cluster or changing the configuration. 
 Especially with a lot of machines.

The attached script (the "patch") could go into 
/usr/lib/update-cluster/diskless.updatelist and do that automatically, 
the admin would only need to run update-cluster-regenerate diskless. 
 The /etc/default/diskless file, which doesn't exist yet, could be 
configured (e.g. via debconf) to customize CLUSTERXML, IMAGEROOT and 
HOSTROOT.

Of course this would have to be added to the documentation too, I'd be 
glad to make a patch for this.

What do you think?

Zeen,
-- 

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux ozymandias 2.4.18-k7-smp #1 SMP Mon Mar 11 
05:14:21 EST 2002 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap0.1.17 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl2.02-3 backwards-compatible wrapper for 
Digest::MD5
ii  m4 1.4-14 a macro processing language
ii  perl   5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and 
Report
^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5)


--03020203050003020507
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="diskless.updatelist"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="diskless.updatelist"

#!/bin/bash

CLUSTERXML=/etc/update-cluster/cluster.xml
IMAGEROOT=/var/lib/diskless/default/root
HOSTROOT=/var/lib/diskless/default

[ -f /etc/default/diskless ] && . /etc/default/diskless

for hostip in `cat $CLUSTERXML | \
   update-cluster-remove --master | \
   update-cluster-parseconfig ip`; do \
  hostname=`cat $CLUSTERXML | \
update-cluster-parseconfig hostname ip | \
grep $hostip | \
cut -d " " -f 1`; \
  echo "(Re)building IP=$hostip host=$hostname mailname=$hostname"; \
  diskless-newhost $IMAGEROOT $hostip host=$hostname mailname=$hostname; \
done

--03020203050003020507--


---
Received: (at 158696-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8

Bug#158694: marked as done (diskless: Updating host's /etc/fstab ignores that file in root)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2002 23:43:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 28 18:43:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p4-117-1.mit.edu [18.53.1.61] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17kCSv-0005nW-00; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 18:43:13 -0500
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mit.edu)
by p4-117-1.mit.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17kCSq-0003mn-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:43:08 -0400
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 19:43:07 -0400
From: Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Massachvsetts Institvte of Technology
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020622 
Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: Updating host's /etc/fstab ignores that file in root
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.17
Severity: minor

Greetings,

When creating or updating a host image, /etc/fstab is always created the 
same way.  This ignores customizations that could be made in /etc/fstab 
in the root image, such as a local disk or swap partition, an alternate 
server for /home, or other NFS entries.

It would be nice if this could be generated from root's /etc/fstab 
instead, simply adding the NFS root, /etc, /var, /tmp and 
/var/lib/diskless entries, instead of using only these.

I suppose whether this is a bug or a wishlist is a matter of opinion, 
feel free to change the severity if you feel that's appropriate.

Zeen,
-- 

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux ozymandias 2.4.18-k7-smp #1 SMP Mon Mar 11 
05:14:21 EST 2002 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap0.1.17 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl2.02-3 backwards-compatible wrapper for 
Digest::MD5
ii  m4 1.4-14 a macro processing language
ii  perl   5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction and 
Report
^^^ (Provides virtual package perl5)



---
Received: (at 158694-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.21

Bug#162615: marked as done (diskless: doc bug - diskless-image-simple)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Sep 2002 18:13:43 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 27 13:13:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17uzcU-0007Cq-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 13:13:42 -0500
Received: (qmail 17023 invoked by uid 0); 27 Sep 2002 18:13:11 -
Received: from pd9e3d46e.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO gate.home) (217.227.212.110)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp009-rz3) with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 18:13:11 -
Received: from ok by gate.home with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17uzbx-0001Dn-00; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:13:09 +0200
From: Onno Kortmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: doc bug - diskless-image-simple
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 20:13:08 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.17
Severity: normal

Hi!

There's wrong information in the diskless package's documentation, chapter 2
reads: 
It requires base.tgz created by createbasetgz script,
and one of the diskless-image packages.
As of writing this, the only diskless-image package
that has been tested is diskless-image-simple
(diskless-image-simple_0.3.0_all.deb).

That's wrong, isn't it? There's also a ..-secure package.

Regards,

Onno


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gate 2.4.18 #1 Mon Sep 16 03:43:15 CEST 2002 i586
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Versions of packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap   0.1.17 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl   2.02-3 backwards-compatible wrapper for D
ii  m41.4-14 a macro processing language
ii  perl [perl5]  5.6.1-7Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 


---
Received: (at 162615-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#164531: marked as done (diskless-image-simple: loopback network device not configured)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2002 02:18:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 12 21:18:37 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-64-174-90-148.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net (doma.ballum) 
[64.174.90.148] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 180YKz-0001S4-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:18:37 -0500
Received: from tho by doma.ballum with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 180YKU-0005Pr-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:18:06 -0700
From: Guenther Thomsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless-image-simple: loopback network device not configured
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:18:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless-image-simple
Version: N/A
Severity: normal


The file /etc/network/interfaces of the diskless hosts contains only comments 
and is missing the crucial definitions for the loopback device.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux doma 2.4.19ctx-13 #5 Sat Oct 5 22:37:04 PDT 2002 i686 
unknown


---
Received: (at 164531-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#164532: marked as done (diskless-image-simple: devfsd package not included)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2002 02:28:13 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 12 21:28:13 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-64-174-90-148.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net (doma.ballum) 
[64.174.90.148] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 180YUH-00027K-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:28:13 -0500
Received: from tho by doma.ballum with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 180YTm-0005Wh-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:27:42 -0700
From: Guenther Thomsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless-image-simple: devfsd package not included
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 19:27:42 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless-image-simple
Version: N/A
Severity: normal

The devfsd package needs to be included in the image, if devfs a valid option.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux doma 2.4.19ctx-13 #5 Sat Oct 5 22:37:04 PDT 2002 i686 
unknown


---
Received: (at 164532-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#251425: marked as done (diskless-image-simple: Dangerous /etc/mtab setup on reboot.)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2004 11:52:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri May 28 04:52:47 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 74.red-80-25-29.pooles.rima-tde.net 
(orm-embar.terramar.selidor.net) [80.25.29.74] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BTfuo-00011h-00; Fri, 28 May 2004 04:52:46 -0700
Received: from ivan by orm-embar.terramar.selidor.net with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BTfxy-0005yF-6W; Fri, 28 May 2004 13:56:02 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless-image-simple: Dangerous /etc/mtab setup on reboot.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 13:56:02 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: diskless-image-simple
Version: 0.3.18.0.4
Severity: normal

  Hello, I would like to remark a possible situation that may arise
  when using local filesystems under diskless.  It may cause data loss
  and filesystem corruption.

  On booting the diskless node, the shared default/root image is
  mounted readonly.  Then, the node's private default/IP/etc directory
  is mounted on top of the shared /etc directory, which results in the
  node being able to write its /etc/mtab file.  On reboot, remote
  filesystems are unmounted, then the local ones.

  Let us suppose a modification to the /etc/fstab template has been
  done in order to mount a local filesystem of the node (say /tmp).  On
  boot, filesystems are mounted and they are reflected on the node's
  private /etc/mtab.  However, on reboot remote filesystems are unmounted
  first, so the node's private /etc is unmounted and the shared root and
  its /etc directory becomes visible again (the root directory is
  obviously not unmounted even if remote).  This leaves the local
  filesystems mounted but the shared /etc/mtab visible.  The contents of
  the shared /etc/mtab are not reliable and surely do not contain any
  reference to any local filesystem.  When init.d/umountfs runs, 'mount'
  does not see the local filesystems mounted in the node, and the system
  is rebooted without unmounting them, which may lead to serious data
  loss and filesystem corruption.

  Two solutions come to my mind:
* Editing the shared image /etc/mtab to include the local
  mounted filesystems.
* Making a symbolic link from the shared /etc/mtab to
  /proc/mounts, the kernel's view of mounted filesystems.

  On both cases, unmounting the private /etc would leave a /etc/mtab
  file with the local mounted partitions.  However, since /proc/mounts
  is generated on the fly by the kernel, the second solution would work
  out of the box.  I have tried it and it does not cause any problems on
  the node (on boot or reboot), and neither it does on the server system
  while chroot()ing to the shared image to do administrative tasks.
  Even mounting /proc in the jail is no problem, since /proc/mounts is
  not writable.  The problem is that chroot()ing into the jail makes
  'mount' unusable until /proc is mounted in it.  However, working in
  tha jail without /proc mounted makes equally no sense.  'mount' is not
  frequently used in such a jail, anyway.

  I know this is a rare case, but the solution could avoid dangerous
  situations and, in any case, the shared image's /etc/mtab makes no
  sense in the state it is left when the shared image is build (neither
  does the corresponding node template, buit it does not matter since it
  is cleared on boot).

  Thanks,
  Ivan

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24orm
Locale: LANG=ca_ES, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES

---
Received: (at 251425-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +

Bug#246358: marked as done (diskless-newhost doesn't process or copy my /etc/network/interfaces)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Apr 2004 15:22:51 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 28 08:22:51 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gaviao.cpdee.ufmg.br (falcao.cpdee.ufmg.br) [150.164.32.252] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BIqtf-0002XU-00; Wed, 28 Apr 2004 08:22:51 -0700
Received: (qmail 12010 invoked by uid 95); 28 Apr 2004 15:22:17 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by falcao by uid 42 with qmail-scanner-1.21 
 (clamuko: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.55.  Clear:RC:1(10.0.5.5):. 
 Processed in 0.03816 secs); 28 Apr 2004 15:22:17 -
Received: from speech.cefalanet.cpdee.ufmg.br (HELO 
speech.cefala.cpdee.ufmg.br) (10.0.5.5)
  by falcao.cpdee.ufmg.br with SMTP; 28 Apr 2004 15:22:17 -
Received: by speech.cefala.cpdee.ufmg.br (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 28 
Apr 2004 12:22:17 -0300
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 12:22:17 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless-newhost doesn't process or copy my /etc/network/interfaces
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Nicolau Werneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.17

I tried to create this file:
_imgdir_/root/usr/lib/diskless-image/template/etc/network/interfaces

It gets copied when I execute diskless-newhost to create a new host, but
if I execute it to reconfigure a host that already exists, the file does
not get copied.

Also,  it is not being processed by M4. I tried to include a host_ip and
host<[]> and this command get copied verbatim.

This configuration of the interfaces file is not necessary, but I tougth
it should work.

-- 
Nicolau Werneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9F99 25AB E47E 8724 2F71
http://cefala.org/~nwerneck   EA40 DC23 42CE 6B76 B07F
"The great end of life is not knowledge but action."
-- Thomas Huxley


---
Received: (at 246358-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_200

Bug#261829: marked as done (package is unusable in its current state)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 13:15:05 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 28 06:15:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from prosun.first.gmd.de (prosun.first.fraunhofer.de) [194.95.168.2] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BpoGu-Kc-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 06:15:04 -0700
Received: from fortknox (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by prosun.first.fraunhofer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id 
i6SDF1f6022132
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:15:02 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (qmail 2198 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2004 13:15:10 -
Received: from unknown (HELO no.intranet.wo.rk) (194.95.171.58)
  by fortknox.dyndns.org with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTPS
  cert [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 28 Jul 2004 13:15:10 -
Received: (nullmailer pid 25686 invoked by uid 1000);
Wed, 28 Jul 2004 13:14:00 -
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: package is unusable in its current state
Reply-To: Soeren Sonnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:13:59 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.5
Severity: grave

We've tried to setup diskless /diskless-image-simple and:

1) There seems to be an inconsistency in the naming scheme. Sometimes
configs are taken from the master from /etc/diskless-host (which does not
exist) and in some version from /etc/diskless-image... on the 
client
only diskless-image is checked in /sbin/init , so booting a client fails.

2) If one fixes this one realizes that in /sbin/init only the /etc 
filesystem gets mounted all the rest (/dev /var /tmp) the client is 
supposed to deal with via the init.orig , i.e.
/etc/init.d/rcS -> /etc/rcS.d/S35mountall script. However that one does not
mount anything nfs related (nonfs nosmb etc in the very top of that file).
I suggest to mount everything in the /sbin/init wrapper like below (to not
having to modify the standard S35mountall script etc).
Furthermore the WARNING: master... is almost invisible as the system boots
to fast, so there should be a timeout like the sleep 5 inserted below
(as this is only for administration it won't delay the standard client
 boot process). Also if the /etc/diskless-image/config does not exist or
the system cannot mount any /var /dev /tmp scripts for a client the system
should wait some minutes and then halt instead of go on booting...

---snip---
# Don't do anything special if root is rw (ie master system).
if touch /test-rw 2>/dev/null
then
rm /test-rw 2>/dev/null
echo "WARNING: master system installed" >&2
sleep 5
exec /sbin/init.orig $*
echo "FATAL ERROR: exec /sbin/init.orig failed" >&2
exit 1
fi

# Try and find configuration file
if [ -f /etc/diskless-image/config ]
then
# Load config file
. /etc/diskless-image/config

# Get IP address, need to mount /proc first
mount -n none /proc -t proc

IP=`ifconfig | grep -A1 eth0 | grep -v eth0 | sed 's/^.*inet 
addr:\([0-9\.]\+\).*$/\1/'`
echo "Client IP address is $IP"

# Mount client's /etc directory
echo -n "Mounting NFS-root directories..."
echo -n "etc.."
mount -n $nfsserver:/$nfshostsdir/$IP/etc /etc -orw,nolock >/dev/null

# Update entries in /etc/mtab
rm -f /etc/mtab~ /etc/nologin >/dev/null
: > /etc/mtab >/dev/null
mount -o remount / >/dev/null
mount -o remount /etc >/dev/null
echo -n "proc.."
mount -o remount /proc >/dev/null

echo -n "var.."
mount $nfsserver:/$nfshostsdir/$IP/var /var -orw,nolock >/dev/null
echo -n "dev.."
mount $nfsserver:/$nfshostsdir/$IP/dev /dev -orw,nolock >/dev/null
echo -n "tmp.."
mount $nfsserver:/$nfshostsdir/$IP/tmp /tmp -orw,nolock >/dev

Bug#246532: marked as done (diskless-newimage do not reconfigure my image)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2004 12:27:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 29 05:27:35 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gaviao.cpdee.ufmg.br (falcao.cpdee.ufmg.br) [150.164.32.252] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BJAdb-0003my-00; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 05:27:35 -0700
Received: (qmail 9838 invoked by uid 95); 29 Apr 2004 12:19:13 -
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by falcao by uid 42 with qmail-scanner-1.21 
 (clamuko: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.55.  Clear:RC:1(10.0.5.5):. 
 Processed in 0.039561 secs); 29 Apr 2004 12:19:13 -
Received: from speech.cefalanet.cpdee.ufmg.br (HELO 
speech.cefala.cpdee.ufmg.br) (10.0.5.5)
  by falcao.cpdee.ufmg.br with SMTP; 29 Apr 2004 12:19:13 -
Received: by speech.cefala.cpdee.ufmg.br (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 29 
Apr 2004 09:19:10 -0300
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:19:10 -0300
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless-newimage do not reconfigure my image
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Nicolau Werneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.4

I want  to  change  my  nfs  home  for  /homenew  instead of /home. As I
understood,  I  should  call diskless-newimage to reconfigure everything
instead  of messing around with the image files... So I tried to execute
diskless-newimage and that happened.

/var/lib/diskless/default# diskless-newimage 
Image directory [/var/lib/diskless/default/root]: 
Re-configuring existing image directory
WARNING: this image directory must already be installed
Died at /usr/lib/diskless/imagedir.pm line 107.
/var/lib/diskless/default# 

How come it is not installed?...


-- 
Nicolau Werneck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9F99 25AB E47E 8724 2F71
http://cefala.org/~nwerneck   EA40 DC23 42CE 6B76 B07F
"You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad."
-- Aldous Huxley

---
Received: (at 246532-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2

Bug#262905: marked as done (diskless: [INTL:da] Danish debconf-po translation)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2004 09:24:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 02 02:24:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrZ3f-0005ba-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 02:24:39 -0700
Received: from dh3cp86.kt.dtu.dk ([127.0.0.1]) [192.38.89.86] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BrZ3d-0003vh-00; Mon, 02 Aug 2004 04:24:37 -0500
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===0194548920=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: [INTL:da] Danish debconf-po translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 11:25:29 +0200
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===0194548920==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: diskless
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch l10n

Please include the attached Danish debconf-po translation (debian/po/da.po)

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK

--===0194548920==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="diskless_0.3.18.0.5_da.po"

#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
# Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: diskless\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2004-03-16 06:58+0100\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2004-08-02 11:24+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
"X-Generator: KBabel 1.3.1\n"
"Plural-Forms:  nplurals=2; plural=(n != 1);\n"

#. Type: string
#. Description
#: ../diskless-image-secure.templates:4 ../diskless-image-simple.templates:4
msgid "Name of master:"
msgstr "Navn på hovedvært:"

#. Type: string
#. Description
#: ../diskless-image-secure.templates:4
msgid ""
"This option specifies the default name for the master host. This is required "
"to be setup by some debian packages. It should have an entry in the DNS."
msgstr ""
"Denne indstilling angiver standardnavnet på hovedværten. Det er nødvendigt "
"at angive dette for visse Debianpakker. Det bør være registreret i DNS."

#. Type: string
#. Description
#: ../diskless-image-secure.templates:12 ../diskless-image-simple.templates:12
msgid "NFS server address:"
msgstr "NFS-serveradresse:"

#. Type: string
#. Description
#: ../diskless-image-secure.templates:12 ../diskless-image-simple.templates:12
msgid ""
"This specifies the address of the central NFS server where to mount "
"partitions from on the clients. It is recommended that this contain the IP "
"address, although this is not required."
msgstr ""
"Dette angiver adressen på den centrale NFS-server, hvorfra klienterne kan "
"montere partitioner. Det anbefales at benytte IP-adressen, selvom dette ikke "
"er påkrævet."

#. Type: string
#. Description
#: ../diskless-image-secure.templates:20 ../diskless-image-simple.templates:20
msgid "NFS image directory mount point:"
msgstr "Monteringspunk

Bug#293264: marked as done (diskless-createbasetgz error)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2005 03:01:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 01 19:01:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 68.105.138.210.bn.2iij.net (viper2.netfort.gr.jp) 
[210.138.105.68] 
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CwAlv-0005rW-00; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 19:01:39 -0800
Received: (qmail 22556 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2005 03:01:37 -
Received: from unknown (HELO ibookg4.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1)
  by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 03:01:37 -
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 12:01:32 +0900
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_El=EDas?= Figueroa Zaror
 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: diskless-createbasetgz  error
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) 
FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu) 
MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: diskless

I'm no longer responsible for this package, I will forward your request as =
a bug.

thanks


At Tue, 01 Feb 2005 19:21:08 -0300,
Jos=C3=A9 El=C3=ADas Figueroa Zaror wrote:
>=20
> Junichi:
>=20
> Step 1.- Permissions directory /tmp are 1777
>=20
> Step 2.- We executed : debinfor:/home/elias# diskless-createbasetgz /tmp
> woody http://http.us.debian.org/debian /home/elias/SinDisco
>=20
> Step 3.- It makes everything in correct form, but when it appears to
> "tar", it finishes unexpectedly:
>=20
> I: Base system installed successfully.
> umount: /tmp/dev/pts: not mounted
> umount: /tmp/dev/shm: not found
> umount: /tmp/proc/bus/usb: not mounted
> bin/
> bin/bash
> tar: /home/elias/SinDisco: Not it can open:  He is a directory
> tar: The error is not recoverable:  exit now
> debinfor:/home/elias#=20
>=20
> Step 3.- The permissions of the directory/tmp have changed to 755, I
> must manually change the permissions of/tmp because it does not let open
> user sessions to me.
>=20
> Step 4.- Thanks, thank you very much by the effort.
>=20
> Step 5.- Excuse, I do not speak English... :(   Elias.
>=20
>=20
> El mar, 01-02-2005 a las 20:34 +0900, Junichi Uekawa escribi=C3=B3:
> > Package: diskless
> >=20
> >=20
> > I don't understand a word you are saying, but I am=20
> > assuming that you are saying /tmp should be mode 1777.
> >=20
> > At Sat, 29 Jan 2005 11:12:20 -0300,
> > Jos=C3=A9 El=C3=ADas Figueroa Zaror wrote:
> > >=20
> > > diskless-createbasetgz  error
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > >=20
> > > Al ejecutat el siguiente comando, para crear "base.tgz", necesario pa=
ra
> > > una imagen con el paquete "diskless"
> > >=20
> > > De la pagina man:
> > >=20
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man diskless-createbasetgz
> > >=20
> > > diskless-createbasetgz(8)  diskless manual
> > > diskless-createbasetgz(8)
> > >=20
> > > NAME
> > >diskless-createbasetgz - create a base.tgz file for diskless
> > > initialization
> > >=20
> > > SYNOPSIS
> > >diskless-createbasetgz  [temporal  work  directory  name]
> > > [debian release tag] [mirror site address] [base.tgz absolute path
> > > location]
> > >=20
> > > Linea de comando :
> > >=20
> > > debinfor:/home/elias# diskless-createbasetgz /tmp woody
> > > http://http.us.debian.org/debian /home/elias/SinDisco
> > >=20
> > > realiza todo el proceso en forma correcta y termina asi:
> > >=20
> > > Setting up klogd (1.4.1-10) ...
> > > Stopping kernel log daemon: klogd
> > > Warning: Fake start-stop-daemon called, doing nothing
> > > .
> > > Starting kernel log daemon: klogd
> > > Warning: Fake start-stop-daemon called, doing nothing
> > > .
> > >=20
> > > Setting up sysklogd (1.4.1-10) ...
> > > Stopping system log daemon: syslogd
> > > Warning: Fake

Bug#293807: marked as done (Missing documentation file)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Feb 2005 22:05:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 05 14:05:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from slug.pjl.ucalgary.ca [136.159.54.26] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CxY3f-00054v-00; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 14:05:39 -0800
Received: from hugo by slug.pjl.ucalgary.ca with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1CxY3d-0005zo-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 05 Feb 2005 15:05:37 -0700
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 15:05:37 -0700
From: Hugo Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Missing documentation file
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: University of Calgary Department of Physics and Astronomy
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Hugo Graumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.5
Severity: normal

The file /usr/share/doc/diskless/README.Debian says:
  Please see /usr/share/doc/diskless/html/book1.html
However, the /usr/share/doc/diskless/html directory is
empty and the book1.html file is nowhere to be found.

Thanks

---
Received: (at 293807-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 18

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#311590: marked as done (INTL:vi)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 04:00:53 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 21:00:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ddgt2-0004GJ-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:00:53 -0700
Received: from [10.1.1.91] (ppp243-75.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net 
[203.122.243.75])
by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id 
j5240nWT091941
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:30:50 +0930 (CST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
To: Submit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-21--208788541
From: Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: INTL:vi
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:30:48 +0930
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--Apple-Mail-21--208788541
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.5
Severity: minor
Tags: l10n, patch

The Vietnamese translation for debconf: diskless
--Apple-Mail-21--208788541
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
x-mac-type=54455854;
x-unix-mode=0755;
x-mac-creator=4C46454C;
name="vi.po"
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename=vi.po

#=20Vietnamese=20Translation=20for=20diskless.=0A#=20Copyright=20=C2=A9=20=
2005=20Free=20Software=20Foundation,=20Inc.=0A#=20Clytie=20Siddall=20=
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,=202005.=0A#=20=0Amsgid=20""=0Amsgstr=20""=0A=
"Project-Id-Version:=20diskless=200.3.18.0.5\n"=0A"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To:=20=
\n"=0A"POT-Creation-Date:=202004-03-16=2006:58+0100\n"=0A=
"PO-Revision-Date:=202005-06-02=2013:29+0930\n"=0A"Last-Translator:=20=
Clytie=20Siddall=20<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"=0A"Language-Team:=20=
Vietnamese=20<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"=0A"MIME-Version:=20=
1.0\n"=0A"Content-Type:=20text/plain;=20charset=3Dutf-8\n"=0A=
"Content-Transfer-Encoding:=208bit\n"=0A"Plural-Forms:=20nplurals=3D1;=20=
plural=3D0\n"=0A=0A#.Type:=20string=0A#.Description=0A=
#:../diskless-image-secure.templates:4=20=
../diskless-image-simple.templates:4=0Amsgid=20"Name=20of=20master:"=0A=
msgstr=20"T=C3=AAn=20m=C3=A1y=20ch=C3=ADnh:"=0A=0A#.Type:=20string=0A=
#.Description=0A#:../diskless-image-secure.templates:4=0Amsgid=20""=0A=
"This=20option=20specifies=20the=20default=20name=20for=20the=20master=20=
host.=20This=20is=20required=20"=0A"to=20be=20setup=20by=20some=20debian=20=
packages.=20It=20should=20have=20an=20entry=20in=20the=20DNS."=0Amsgstr=20=
"T=C3=B9y=20ch=E1=BB=8Dn=20n=C3=A0y=20ghi=20r=C3=B5=20t=C3=AAn=20m=E1=BA=B7=
c=20=C4=91=E1=BB=8Bnh=20cho=20m=C3=A1y=20ch=C3=ADnh.=20M=E1=BB=99t=20=
s=E1=BB=91=20g=C3=B3i=20tin=20Debian=20c=E1=BA=A7n=20thi=E1=BA=BFt=20=
b=E1=BA=A1n=20thi=E1=BA=BFt=20l=E1=BA=ADp=20n=C3=B3.=20N=C3=B3=20n=C3=AAn=20=
l=C3=A0=20m=E1=BB=A5c=20nh=E1=BA=ADp=20trong=20DNS=20(h=E1=BB=87=20=
th=E1=BB=91ng=20t=C3=AAn=20mi=E1=BB=81n)."=0A=0A#.Type:=20string=0A=
#.Description=0A#:../diskless-image-secure.templates:12=20=
../diskless-image-simple.templates:12=0Amsgid=20"NFS=20server=20=
address:"=0Amsgstr=20"=C4=90=E1=BB=8Ba=20ch=E1=BB=89=20m=C3=A1y=20ph=E1=BB=
=A5c=20v=E1=BB=A5=20NFS:"=0A=0A#.Type:=20string=0A#.Description=0A=
#:../diskless-image-secure.templates:12=20=
../diskless-image-simple.templates:12=0Amsgid=20""=0A"This=20specifies=20=
the=20address=20of=20the=20central=20NFS=20server=20where=20to=20mount=20=
"=0A"partitions=20from=20on=20the=20clients.=20It=20is=20recommended=20=
that=20this=20contain=20the=20IP=20"=0A"address,=20although=20this=20is=20=
not=20required."=0Amsgstr=20"T=C3=B9y=20ch=E1=BB=8Dn=20n=C3=A0y=20ghi=20=
r=C3=B5=20=C4=91=E1=BB=8Ba=20ch=E1=BB=89=20c=E1=BB=A7a=20m=C3=A1y=20=
ph=E1=BB=A5c=20v=E1=BB=A5=20trung=20=C6=B0=C6=A1ng=20NFS=20n=C6=A1i=20=
c=E1=BA=A7n=20g=E1=BA=AFn=20k=E1=BA=BFt=20ph=C3=A2n=20v=C3=B9ng=20t=E1=BB=AB=
=20c=C3=A1c=20m=C3=A1y=20kh=C3=A1ch.=20=C4=90=E1=BB=87=20

Bug#311591: marked as done (diskless)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jun 2005 04:02:31 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 01 21:02:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ddguc-0004ms-00; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 21:02:31 -0700
Received: from [10.1.1.91] (ppp243-75.lns2.adl2.internode.on.net 
[203.122.243.75])
by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j5242Scf011287
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:32:29 +0930 (CST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; delsp=yes; format=flowed
To: Submit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 13:32:27 +0930
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,ONEWORD 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch

While translating the debconf file diskless_0.3.18.0.5, I encountered =20=

the following typos, which I thought you might like to eliminate in a =20=

future release.
_

1.
po:5
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Type: string
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Description
reference:  =E2=91=A4   ../diskless-image-secure.templates:12 =
../diskless-image-=20
simple.templates:12
Original:   =E2=8C=980=09
This specifies the address of the central NFS server where to mount
partitions from on the clients. It is recommended that this contain =20
the IP
address, although this is not required.

(I suggest:
"This specifies the address of the central NFS server on which =20
clients will mount partitions"
or
"This specifies the address of the central NFS server on which will =20
be mounted partitions from clients"
also
"Including the IP address is recommended, but not required."

This is fairly complex English, so please don't feel bad about it. ;) )


2.
po:9
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Type: string
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Description
reference:  =E2=91=A4   ../diskless-image-secure.templates:27 =
../diskless-image-=20
simple.templates:27
Original:   =E2=8C=980=09
This option specifies the path which will be used by the clients to =20
their
private read-write directories.  The IP address will be appended to =20
the end
of this path.

(to access their private read-write directories?)


3.
po:11
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Type: string
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Description
reference:  =E2=91=A4   ../diskless-image-secure.templates:35 =
../diskless-image-=20
simple.templates:35
Original:   =E2=8C=980=09
This specifies where /home on the clients should be mounted from your =20=

NFS
server. Examples are /home, /tftpboot/home, etc.

(You don't use "for example" or "e.g." with "etc." One or the other, =20
not both. ;)
With "e.g." or "for example", you're saying "here are a few =20
possibilities".
With "etc.", you're saying "and the rest".
Thus you're saying in this string, "Here are a few possible home =20
directories, and the rest." It doesn't fit. So you can say:
"For example,  /home, /tftpboot/home."
or
"( /home, /tftpboot/home etc.)"
;)


4.
You have a pair of duplicate strings, bar the capital D in Debian. =20
You may want to remove one. ;)

.po:3
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Type: string
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Description
reference:  =E2=91=A4   ../diskless-image-secure.templates:4
Original:   =E2=8C=980=09
This option specifies the default name for the master host. This is =20
required
to be setup by some debian packages. It should have an entry in the DNS.

po:22
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Type: string
auto:   =E2=91=A4   Description
reference:  =E2=91=A4   ../diskless-image-simple.templates:4
Original:   =E2=8C=980=09
This option specifies the default name for the master host. This is =20
required
to be setup by some Debian packages. It should have an entry in the DNS.

_
submitted by:

Cly

Bug#315516: marked as done (diskless package is unusable due to new installer)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jun 2005 07:45:02 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 23 00:45:02 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server-a.the-nelsons.us (mail.the-nelsons.us) [63.230.133.73] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DlMOU-TE-00; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:45:02 -0700
Received: (qmail 31250 invoked by uid 1010); 23 Jun 2005 00:44:36 -0700
Received: from 192.168.1.6 by server-a (envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, uid 
1008) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms 
 (clamdscan: 0.83/737. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms.  
 Clear:RC:0(192.168.1.6):SA:0(-2.8/3.5):. 
 Processed in 14.904116 secs); 23 Jun 2005 07:44:36 -
X-Antivirus-the-nelsons.us-Mail-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via server-a
X-Antivirus-the-nelsons.us: 1.24-st-qms 
(Clear:RC:0(192.168.1.6):SA:0(-2.8/3.5):. Processed in 14.904116 secs Process 
31238)
Received: from unknown (HELO desktop) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@192.168.1.6)
  by mail.the-nelsons.us with SMTP; 23 Jun 2005 00:44:20 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Thomas Nelson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless package is unusable due to new installer
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:44:44 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="=_NextPart_000_0003_01C5778C.BF8E0690"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_50_60,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_0003_01C5778C.BF8E0690
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: diskless
Version:  0.3.18.0.5
Severity: important

With the release of Sarge 3.1 and the new installer base2_2.tgz is no =
longer available.  This problem does now make the package unusable.

~ Thomas Nelson
--=_NextPart_000_0003_01C5778C.BF8E0690
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable








Package: diskless
Version:  0.3.18.0.5
Severity: important
 
With the release of Sarge 3.1 and the =
new installer=20
base2_2.tgz is no longer available.  This problem does now make the =
package=20
unusable.
 
~ Thomas =
Nelson

--=_NextPart_000_0003_01C5778C.BF8E0690--



---
Received: (at 315516-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
U

Bug#316658: marked as done (diskless: Please remove ending dot in short description of package)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2005 17:23:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 02 10:23:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mailproxy01.edpnet.net (mailproxy01.edpnet.be) [212.71.0.18] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Doli8-0002g2-00; Sat, 02 Jul 2005 10:23:25 -0700
Received: from aphrodite.beeznest.net (213.219.187.84.adslpower.by.edpnet.be 
[213.219.187.84])
by mailproxy01.edpnet.be (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j62HRoKi022404
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 2 Jul 2005 19:27:54 +0200
Received: by aphrodite.beeznest.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9F7AF4EC2E; Sat,  2 Jul 2005 19:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jerome Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: Please remove ending dot in short description of package
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 19:22:40 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on 
mailproxy01.edpnet.be
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.5
Severity: wishlist

The short description of the package is ending with a dot, while no
other package in Debian do.
Please remove this dot.

Thanks

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)

Versions of packages diskless depends on:
ii  debootstrap   0.2.45-0.2 Bootstrap a basic Debian system
ii  libmd5-perl   2.03-1 backwards-compatible wrapper for D
ii  m41.4.2-1a macro processing language
ii  perl [perl5]  5.8.4-8Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 

---
Received: (at 316658-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 22

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.

Bug#319253: marked as done ([l10n] Initial Czech translation of diskless debconf messages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jul 2005 17:53:50 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 20 10:53:50 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from csnt.inf.upol.cz [158.194.80.80] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DvIlR-0005BH-00; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:53:50 -0700
Received: from vychodil.inf.upol.cz ([158.194.80.12]) by CSNT.inf.upol.cz with 
Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830);
 Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:53:45 +0200
Received: from kurem by vychodil.inf.upol.cz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1DvIho-0001Cu-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:50:04 +0200
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 19:50:04 +0200
From: Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [l10n] Initial Czech translation of diskless debconf messages
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Miroslav Kure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jul 2005 17:53:45.0765 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[F9801550:01C58D53]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: diskless
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n, patch

Hi, in attachement there is initial Czech translation (cs.po) of
diskless debconf messages, please include it.

-- 
Miroslav Kure

--EVF5PPMfhYS0aIcm
Content-Type: application/octet-stream
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="cs.po.gz"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
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Bug#318530: marked as done (chos: FTBFS: Undefined reference to `MINOR')

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:57:33 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line chos removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jul 2005 02:48:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 15 19:48:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pop05.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.58] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DtcjN-zQ-00; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:48:45 -0700
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] 
helo=frobnitz.homelinux.net)
by pop05.mail.atl.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10)
id 1DtcjM-000752-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 22:48:44 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.homelinux.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DtcjL-0005Dh-TA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:48:43 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: chos: FTBFS: Undefined reference to `MINOR'
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:48:43 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: chos
Severity: serious
Version: 0.85-4

>From my build log:

...
gcc -funsigned-char -s -O2 -W -Wall -DBUG_HARDWARE -DSUPPORT_BZIMAGE 
-DSUPPORT_INITRD -DSUPPORT_DOSMENUKEY -I/tmp/buildd/chos-0.85/sources/include 
-c device.c -o device.o
device.c: In function 'last_dev':
device.c:46: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value
device.c:50: warning: implicit declaration of function 'MAJOR'
device.c:50: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
device.c:51: warning: implicit declaration of function 'MINOR'
...
gcc -funsigned-char -s -O2 -W -Wall -DBUG_HARDWARE -DSUPPORT_BZIMAGE 
-DSUPPORT_INITRD -DSUPPORT_DOSMENUKEY -I/tmp/buildd/chos-0.85/sources/include 
main.o image.o install.o map.o bg.o image-linux.o image-bsect.o bin.o device.o 
-o /tmp/buildd/chos-0.85/sources/../bin/chos
device.o: In function `dev_name':
device.c:(.text+0xac): undefined reference to `MINOR'
device.c:(.text+0xb7): undefined reference to `MAJOR'
...
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [/tmp/buildd/chos-0.85/sources/../bin/chos] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/chos-0.85/sources/installer'
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/chos-0.85/sources'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-9-amd64-k8
Locale: LANG=en, LC_CTYPE=en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
Daniel Schepler  "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]haven't had breakfast yet."
 -- Orson Scott Card

---
Received: (at 318530-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:58:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:58:03 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5g3-0006VQ-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:58:03 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7vPX1024664
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:57:25 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7vX06029547
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:57:33 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7vXdE029545
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:57:33 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:57:33 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: chos removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_0

Bug#326873: marked as done (Customized directories not mounted if NFS root is rw)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 10:44:41 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 03:44:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ECawS-0006nn-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:44:41 -0700
Received: from [10.1.0.3] (lns-bzn-2-gre-82-250-63-159.adsl.proxad.net 
[82.250.63.159])
by smtp2-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82798B2B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  6 Sep 2005 12:44:39 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 12:44:39 +0200
From: Frederic Dernbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050817)
X-Accept-Language: fr, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Customized directories not mounted if NFS root is rw
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.18.0.5

I installed the diskless package on a server and succeded to boot a 
diskless client successfully;

I successfully managed to start my diskless client (through PXE and 
recompiled kernel with appropriate options).The root file system is 
mounted as expected  by the client though NFS. On my server, I did not 
chage the defaults proposed by both commands 'diskless-newimage' and 
'diskless-newhost' at installation time:
- the root file system for myclient to NFS mount is : 
/var/lib/diskless/default/root
- the customized '/etc' '/tmp' and '/var' directories for my diskless 
client (with IP adress being 10.1.0.4) are stored in : 
/var/lib/diskless/default/10.1.0.4

However, during the client boot, the cutomized directories ( 
/var/lib/diskless/default/10.1.0.4/etc, 
/var/lib/diskless/default/10.1.0.4/var and 
/var/lib/diskless/default/10.1.0.4/tmp are not mounted as /etc, /var, 
/tmp). I believe they should.

I realize this is due to the fact that I boot I mount the NFS root file 
system with read-write option. I do this through my SYSLINUX/PXE boot 
script (otpion 'rw' of append insctruction in the PXE file below :

default diskless

label   diskless
kernel bzImage
append rw root=/dev/nfs 
nfsroot=10.1.0.3:/var/lib/diskless/default/root ip=dhcp

label   local
localboot 0


When I mount the NFS root file system read-only, then the customized 
directories are mounted for my diskless client as expected.

I do not see where this kind of logic is implemented. I believe the 
customized directories should be mounted even if the root file system is 
mounted read-write.

---
Received: (at 326873-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:26 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],

Bug#88529: marked as done (diskless: .ai-old files get in the way of updating host for removed packages)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Mar 2001 23:13:59 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 04 17:13:59 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp-rt-3.wanadoo.fr (apicra.wanadoo.fr) [:::193.252.19.155] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 14ZhhO-00051c-00; Sun, 04 Mar 2001 17:13:59 -0600
Received: from andira.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.152) by apicra.wanadoo.fr; 5 Mar 
2001 00:13:53 +0100
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (62.161.78.109) by andira.wanadoo.fr; 5 Mar 
2001 00:13:39 +0100
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
id 14ZhwC-0006Ef-00; Mon, 05 Mar 2001 00:29:16 +0100
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: diskless: .ai-old files get in the way of updating host for removed 
packages
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2001 00:29:09 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.11
Severity: normal

Here I removed the xdm package, and run newhost for update.  Here is what I
get:

Delete /var/lib/diskless/default/10.0.0.2//var/lib/xdm/authdir
deleted: deleted; /var/lib/diskless/default/10.0.0.2//var/lib/xdm: same
Delete /var/lib/diskless/default/10.0.0.2//var/lib/xdm
Cannot delete /var/lib/diskless/default/10.0.0.2//var/lib/xdm: Directory not 
empty
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/X11/gdm# ls 
/var/lib/diskless/default/10.0.0.2//var/lib/xdm
authdir.ai-old
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/etc/X11/gdm# rm -rf 
/var/lib/diskless/default/10.0.0.2//var/lib/xdm


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bylbo 2.2.18 #1 Wed Dec 20 23:25:48 CET 2000 i586

Versions of packages diskless depends on:
ii  libdigest-md5-perl2.12-2 MD5 Message Digest for Perl   
ii  m41.4-12 a macro processing language   
ii  perl [perl5]  5.6.0-20   Larry Wall's Practical Extracting 


---
Received: (at 88529-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 07:55:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 00:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5dV-00067X-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 00:55:25 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D7tDOP024226;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:13 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D7tLv2029532;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D7tLkm029530;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: diskless removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 26

diskless has been removed from Debian due to bugginess and lack of
maintenance.  Similar functionality is provided by lessdisks.  For
details, see .


--

Bug#77389: marked as done (more errors in /var for slave diskless nodes)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:55:21 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line diskless removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2000 22:16:20 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 18 16:16:20 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from beowulf-1.ece.wisc.edu [128.104.183.201] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13xGHU-0007mL-00; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:16:20 -0600
Received: from mxu by beowulf-1.ece.wisc.edu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13xGHT-0004OW-00; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:16:19 -0600
From: Min Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: more errors in /var for slave diskless nodes
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 16:16:19 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: diskless
Version: 0.3.9
Severity: normal

Hi,
  Once again, I have found the following problem with the new
diskless package:

diskless-newhost:
default/IP/var/yp is still missing Makefile, nicknames

default/IP/var/log/wtmp is still missing for slave diskless nodes.

Also, on nfs server, default/root/var/lib/dpkg should be exported
individually.

mount var/lib/dpkg should be after the line of var in fstab template
file. otherwise overrided by mount /var. I suggest to put it after
/tmp(all rw dirs have been mounted)

also, added option "rsize=8192,wsize=8192" to fstab for higher
performance.

I also attached the template fstab file I am using the exports
file.

Thanks and regards,

Min

fstab:
#/dev/hda1  -   swapdefaults1   2
none/proc   procdefaults1   0
image_nfsserver:image_nfsimagedir / nfs ro,defaults,nolock,rsize=8192,wsize=8192
0   1
image_nfsserver:image_nfshostsdir/host_ip/etc /etc nfs  defaults,nolock,rsize=81
92,wsize=8192   0   1
image_nfsserver:image_nfshostsdir/host_ip/dev /dev nfs  defaults,nolock,rsize=81
92,wsize=8192   0   1
image_nfsserver:image_nfshostsdir/host_ip/var /var nfs  defaults,nolock,rsize=81
92,wsize=8192   0   1
image_nfsserver:image_nfshostsdir/host_ip/tmp /tmp nfs  defaults,nolock,rsize=81
92,wsize=8192   0   1
image_nfsserver:image_nfsimagedir/var/lib/dpkg /var/lib/dpkg nfsro,defau
lts,nolock,rsize=8192,wsize=81920   1

# no need in our cluster, by mxu, 11.17.2000
#ifelse(image_nfshomedir,<[none]>,<[dnl]>,<[dnl
#image_nfsserver:image_nfshomedir /home nfs defaults,nolock 0
2]>)
#

exports:
# /etc/exports: the access control list for filesystems which may be exported
#   to NFS clients.  See exports(5).

# a shared directory for all cluster nodes(both master and diskless)
/var/shared 128.104.183.202(rw, no_root_squash)
/var/shared 128.104.183.203(rw, no_root_squash)
/var/shared 128.104.183.204(rw, no_root_squash)
/var/shared 128.104.183.205(rw, no_root_squash)
/var/shared 128.104.183.206(rw, no_root_squash)

#
# these are for all slave diskless node
/var/lib/diskless/default/root 128.104.180.0/255.255.252.0(ro no_root_squash)

#
#beowulf-3
#/var/lib/diskless/default/root 128.104.180.203(ro no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.203/etc 128.104.183.203(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.203/dev 128.104.183.203(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.203/var 128.104.183.203(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.203/tmp 128.104.183.203(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/root/var/lib/dpkg 128.104.183.203(ro no_root_squash)

#
#beowulf-4
#/var/lib/diskless/default/root 128.104.180.204(ro no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.204/etc 128.104.183.204(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.204/dev 128.104.183.204(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.204/var 128.104.183.204(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.204/tmp 128.104.183.204(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/root/var/lib/dpkg 128.104.183.204(ro no_root_squash)

#
#beowulf-5
#/var/lib/diskless/default/root 128.104.180.205(ro no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.205/etc 128.104.183.205(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.205/dev 128.104.183.205(rw no_root_squash)
/var/lib/diskless/default/128.104.183.2

Bug#120548: marked as done (aeromail: Messages sent with Aeromail have 'www-data' as email address)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aeromail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2001 19:43:35 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 21 13:43:35 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from h24-82-8-37.ed.shawcable.net (rama.flamewars.org) [24.82.8.37] 
(mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 166dHT-0007Hl-00; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 13:43:35 -0600
Received: from phil by rama.flamewars.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
id 166dHR-0004Cj-00; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:43:33 -0700
From: Phil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aeromail: Messages sent with Aeromail have 'www-data' as email address
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.35
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.35
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 12:43:33 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: aeromail
Version: 1.40-3
Severity: normal

Whenever I use aeromail to send a message, the from address that is sent is 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux rama 2.2.19 #1 Sat Oct 20 18:09:49 EST 2001 i586
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages aeromail depends on:
ii  php4  3:4.0.99-4 A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip
ii  php4-imap 3:4.0.99-4 IMAP module for php4


---
Received: (at 120548-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 08:08:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 01:08:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5qQ-00040Z-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:08:46 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D87tS1027861;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:07:55 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D883Up029639;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D883WA029637;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aeromail removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

aeromail has been removed from Debian because no one adopted it since
January 2004, and because it is unusable with the default configuration
of PHP.  ilohamail provides a lightweight alternative.  For details,
see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#127115: marked as done (aeromail: Configuration file location doesn't fit)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aeromail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Dec 2001 23:36:32 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 30 17:36:32 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uds213-55.dial.hccnet.nl (charis.vernstok) [62.251.55.213] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16KpVI-0005lK-00; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 17:36:32 -0600
Received: from jelmer by charis.vernstok with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16KmPZ-0002uX-00; Sun, 30 Dec 2001 21:18:25 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aeromail: Configuration file location doesn't fit
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Jelmer Vernooij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2001 21:18:25 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: aeromail
Version: 1.40-3
Severity: normal

The configuration file of aeromail, config.inc, should be somewhere in /etc/. 
It could possibly be symlinked from the current location. (Current situation is 
not policy-compliant)


-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux charis 2.4.16-686 #1 Wed Nov 28 09:27:17 EST 2001 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages aeromail depends on:
ii  php4   4.0.100-1  A server-side, HTML-embedded scripting langu
ii  php4-imap  4.0.100-1  IMAP module for php4

---
Received: (at 127115-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 08:08:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 01:08:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5qQ-00040Z-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:08:46 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D87tS1027861;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:07:55 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D883Up029639;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D883WA029637;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aeromail removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

aeromail has been removed from Debian because no one adopted it since
January 2004, and because it is unusable with the default configuration
of PHP.  ilohamail provides a lightweight alternative.  For details,
see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#179123: marked as done (bad function decode_header_string() in global.inc)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aeromail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2003 00:26:46 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 30 18:26:45 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from hm61.locaweb.com.br [200.213.197.161] 
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18eP12-0006dh-00; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 18:26:45 -0600
Received: (qmail 18308 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 00:26:48 -
Received: from hm47.locaweb.com.br (200.182.98.147)
  by hm61.locaweb.com.br with QMTP; 31 Jan 2003 00:26:48 -
Received: (qmail 20186 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2003 00:26:35 -
Received: from unknown (HELO debian) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]@200.158.26.202)
  by hm47.locaweb.com.br with SMTP; 31 Jan 2003 00:26:35 -
Received: from localhost
([127.0.0.1] helo=zappitec.com.br ident=paulo)
by debian with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18eP0y-AR-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 30 Jan 2003 22:26:40 -0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 22:26:37 -0200
From: Paulo Zappi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: pt-br, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bad function decode_header_string() in global.inc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,
  X_ACCEPT_LANG
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: aeromail
Version: 1.45-1

The current function decode_header_string() in file global.inc is unable to
handle decoding of multiple elements. It checks only for one "=?" 
substring at the beginning
of the text to decode. If there are multiple elements to decode, the 
function fails to decode the subsequent
elements.

As a suggestion, I would replace function decode_header_string() with 
the following:


//--
function decode_header_string($hed_str)
{

$output = "Empty String";
  
if($hed_str)
{
  
$element=imap_mime_header_decode($hed_str);
$output = "";
for($i=0; $i < count($element); $i++) {
$output .= $element[$i]->text;
}

}
return $output;
}
//-

The function above appears to decode the elements correctly.

I'm using debian 3.0, kernel 2.4.18-k7 and php4 v. 4.1.2-6




---
Received: (at 179123-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 08:08:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 01:08:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5qQ-00040Z-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:08:46 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D87tS1027861;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:07:55 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D883Up029639;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D883WA029637;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aeromail removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4

aeromail has been removed from Debian because no one adopted it since
January 2004, and because it is unusable with the default configuration
of PHP.  iloha

Bug#311119: marked as done (aeromail: unusable with default PHP configuration)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aeromail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 May 2005 19:43:54 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 28 12:43:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.26] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dc7Du-0008UR-00; Sat, 28 May 2005 12:43:54 -0700
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mwinf0508.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id EA34C1C000F1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 28 May 2005 21:43:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from awak.dyndns.org (AGrenoble-152-1-51-232.w83-201.abo.wanadoo.fr 
[83.201.80.232])
by mwinf0508.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id BD5F51C000E1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 28 May 2005 21:43:22 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from xav by awak.dyndns.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1Dc7DJ-0003Ic-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 28 May 2005 21:43:17 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aeromail can't login
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 21:43:17 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: aeromail
Version: 1.45-1.2
Severity: important


Aeromail can't login. It seems it doesn't work with the version of PHP
currently in sarge. The problem is that it uses $PHP_AUTH.. variables
instead of $_SERVER["$PHP_AUTH..."].

Here is a patch which fixes it for me:


--- /var/www/aeromail/global.inc.old2005-05-28 21:38:22.692365763 +0200
+++ /var/www/aeromail/global.inc2005-05-28 21:38:17.581995625 +0200
@@ -267,6 +267,9 @@
exit;
 }

+$PHP_AUTH_USER = $_SERVER["PHP_AUTH_USER"];
+$PHP_AUTH_PW = $_SERVER["PHP_AUTH_PW"];
+
 if ((!$PHP_AUTH_USER) or (!$PHP_AUTH_PW) or ($time > time()))
 {
login_prompt();


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages aeromail depends on:
ii  debconf  1.4.30.13   Debian configuration management sy
ii  php4 4:4.3.10-15 server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-imap4:4.3.10-15 IMAP module for php4

-- debconf information:
* aeromail/forcefrom: false
* aeromail/name: Le Mail a Bestouff
* aeromail/imapserver: awak
* aeromail/imaptype: Cyrus
* aeromail/maildomain: awak.dyndns.org


---
Received: (at 39-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 08:08:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 01:08:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5qQ-00040Z-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:08:46 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D87tS1027861;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:07:55 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D883Up029639;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D883WA029637;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aeromail removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-

Bug#250801: marked as done (aeromail: non-obvious certificate validation failure)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aeromail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 2004 01:53:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon May 24 18:53:15 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.bltc.net [195.82.124.113] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BSR7z-0001a1-00; Mon, 24 May 2004 18:53:15 -0700
Received: from delysid.bltc.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by mail.bltc.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) with ESMTP id 
i4P1rE2w025943;
Tue, 25 May 2004 02:53:14 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by delysid.bltc.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Debian-3) id i4P1r9as025932;
Tue, 25 May 2004 02:53:09 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mark Sheppard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aeromail: non-obvious certificate validation failure
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.58
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 02:53:09 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: aeromail
Version: 1.45-1.2
Severity: important

Hi,

If you install the latest version of uw-imapd in testing it creates a
self-signed SSL certificate.  When you try to login to this IMAP
server using Aeromail it tries to authenticate the certificate (even
with non-SSL connections) and fails.  But it doesn't produce *any*
output mentioning this fact, all you get is exactly the same behaviour
as if you'd entered an incorrect password.

The PHP function imap_last_error() does return a message indicating
this ("Certificate failure for localhost: self signed certificate:
/O=University of Washington IMAP
daemon/OU=delysid/CN=delysid.bltc.net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]"),
but that's not being treated any differently by Aeromail to "Can not
authenticate to IMAP server: AUTHENTICATE LOGIN failed".

It would help people track down problems if Aeromail differentiated
between error messages and/or passed them back to the user.

Cheers,
Mark

PS.  I mistakenly filed bug #250389 first before tracking down the
true nature of this bug.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686-smp
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB

Versions of packages aeromail depends on:
ii  debconf   1.4.25 Debian configuration management sy
ii  php4  4:4.3.4-4  A server-side, HTML-embedded scrip
ii  php4-imap 4:4.3.4-4  IMAP module for php4

-- debconf information excluded

---
Received: (at 250801-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 08:08:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 01:08:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5qQ-00040Z-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:08:46 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D87tS1027861;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:07:55 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D883Up029639;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D883WA029637;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aeromail removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

Bug#164482: marked as done (Bug AEROMAIL / php 4.1.2)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aeromail removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Oct 2002 16:25:25 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 12 11:25:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (dns.venmex.com) [200.44.147.186] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 180P4u-0008Gb-00; Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:25:25 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by dns.venmex.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g9CFqan01782;
Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:52:36 -0400
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:52:36 -0400
From: Aventino Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Authentication-Warning: dns.venmex.com: apache set sender to afariac using -f
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: AeroMail (http://the.cushman.net/reverb/aeromail/)
Subject: Bug AEROMAIL / php 4.1.2
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: Aeromail
Version: 1.45

when I upgrade php version 4.0.6-14 to php version 4.1.2-7.1.3, aeromail not 
login 
account pop3.

thanks

Aventino Faria

---
Received: (at 164482-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Sep 2005 08:08:47 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 13 01:08:47 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EF5qQ-00040Z-00; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:08:46 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8D87tS1027861;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:07:55 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id j8D883Up029639;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j8D883WA029637;
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:08:03 +0200
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: aeromail removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3

aeromail has been removed from Debian because no one adopted it since
January 2004, and because it is unusable with the default configuration
of PHP.  ilohamail provides a lightweight alternative.  For details,
see .


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#121201: And in southwestern Pennsylvania, about 1,000 people attended a memorial service in the field where Flight 93 crashed after it was hijacked by terrorists.

[Tammie Reagan]

Nutrition Update: New product just released

 Product Name: >Hoodia<

 What it does:

 - Suppress your appetite and feel full and satisfied all day long
 - Boost your energy levels
 - Lose excess (w)-(e)-(i)-(g)-(h)-(t)
 - Boost your metabolism
 - Burn body (f)-(a)-(t)
 - Burn calories
 - Attack obesity

 This product was just featured on 60 Minutes, and the BBC New report on Sept 
12th, 2005


 Further Information:
 http://www.ingienfok.info



 When asked if the assistance his forces are providing -- bottles of water and 
food for people who won't leave -- is in opposition to what the city and state 
want, Honore said local officials are also giving out supplies."What do you 
mean?" Maestri asked, though he already knew the answer.When asked if the 
assistance his forces are providing -- bottles of water and food for people who 
won't leave -- is in opposition to what the city and state want, Honore said 
local officials are also giving out supplies."We got a lot of good people on 
the ground here that are with FEMA and with the state agencies," he said. "They 
wear their badges, and they look good. But unfortunately, we just not have seen 
all the assets and all the resources that we need in our city."Rabaul, on New 
Britain island, was destroyed in the September 1994 eruption of Tuvurvur 
volcano.Chaos inside, outside the levee wallsWarning of the possibility of 
coastal flooding, Gov. Mike Easley sent 200 National Guard soldiers to staging 
centers in eastern North Carolina and ordered a mandatory evacuation of fragile 
Ocracoke Island on the Outer Banks, reachable only by ferry.Ophelia is the 
seventh hurricane in this year’s busy Atlantic hurricane season, which began 
June 1 and ends Nov. 30. Peak storm activity typically occurs from the end of 
August through mid-September.Papua New Guinea lies to the east of Indonesia, 
which bore the brunt of the 9.15 magnitude quake and tsunami on Dec. 26."The 
big thing is going to be what happens when the testing comes back -- the test 
results from the water that we sampled," he said. The massive rescue effort 
that resulted was a fugue of improvisation, by fleets of small boats that set 
sail off highway underpasses and angry airport directors and daredevil 
helicopter pilots. Tens of thousands were saved as the city swamped; they were 
plucked from rooftops and bused, eventually, out of the disaster zoneOther 
developmentsAllen declined to describe specifics of the plan to reporters, but 
said, "I think we know how to move forward from here." “If it was a Category 
Four barreling down here, I would get out if I had a chance,” Lee said. “The 
structures just can’t take that kind of wind. We’re cautiously watching 
(Ophelia). We’re not giving up until it’s north of us.”Chaos inside, outside 
the levee walls"Clearly the FEMA response has been slow," Matthew Avara, mayor 
of Pascagoula, Mississippi, told CNN Saturday night.The Federal Emergency 
Management Agency has been criticized for what state and local officials have 
said was a slow response to Katrina."We all stand together to help each other 
and to help those who need our help in the future," Giuliani said. "We remember 
forever all the brothers and sisters that we lost on that day."FEMA Director 
Michael Brown was recalled to Washington on Friday by Homeland Security 
Secretary Michael Chertoff, who named Adm. Allen to head the hurricane relief 
efforts. Once the storm starts moving, the latest forecast track indicated the 
eye could come ashore southeast of Cape Lookout near Wilmington and cross 
Pamlico Sound on the central coast, said meteorologist Gil Wagi at the National 
Weather Service office in Newport.SYDNEY - A major earthquake measuring 7.3 in 
magnitude shook parts of Papua New Guinea on Friday, but there were no 
immediate reports of damage and a tsunami was unlikely, officials said.Other 
developmentsEarlier, the president observed a moment of silence on the south 
lawn of the White House for victims of the terrorist attacks on September 11, 
2001.As of Sunday morning, the official death toll in Louisiana was 154. 
Officials in five states put the overall total of dead at 383. As the 
floodwaters recede and the dead are counted, what went wrong during a terrible 
week that would render a modern American metropolis of nearly half a million 
people uninhabitable and set off the largest exodus of people since the Civil 
War, is starting to become clear. Federal, state and local officials failed to 
heed forecasts of disaster from hurricane experts. Evacuation plans, never 
practical, were scrapped entirely for New Orleans's poorest and least able. And 
once floodwaters rose, as had been long predicted, the rescue teams, medical 
personnel and emergency power necessary to fight back were nowhere to be 
found.FEMA said Sunday it has paid $758 million to more than 364,000 households 
affected by the storm. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Illinois, criticized President Bush 
on Sunday for responding to t

Bug#151566: Lt. Gen. Russel Honore told CNN's "Late Edition" the death toll in New Orleans is unlikely to reach 10,000, a figure Mayor Ray Nagin had estimated based on how many people appeared to have

[Leonardo Baldwin]

Nutrition Update: New product just released

 Product Name: >Hoodia<

 What it does:

 - Suppress your appetite and feel full and satisfied all day long
 - Boost your energy levels
 - Lose excess (w)-(e)-(i)-(g)-(h)-(t)
 - Boost your metabolism
 - Burn body (f)-(a)-(t)
 - Burn calories
 - Attack obesity

 This product was just featured on 60 Minutes, and the BBC New report on Sept 
12th, 2005


 Further Information:
 http://www.imiebtemt.info



 Tough decisionsOphelia is the seventh hurricane in this year’s busy Atlantic 
hurricane season, which began June 1 and ends Nov. 30. Peak storm activity 
typically occurs from the end of August through mid-September.Relatives in the 
crowd bowed their heads and sobbed as speakers uttered brief, personal messages 
to the brothers and sisters they lost, many voices breaking in sorrow.'Ring of 
Fire'The federal government Saturday abandoned its effort to prevent the media 
from reporting on the recovery of bodies in New Orleans after CNN filed a 
lawsuit. (Full story)A front approaching from the west could push the storm 
away from the coast but the likelihood of that was uncertain, he said.He 
emphasized that officials still do not know how many people died in the storm 
and flooding that ravaged New Orleans.In addition, the effort to recover bodies 
was improving so the people could be documented, families notified and the 
bodies transported.The ceremony came as Hurricane Katrina left Americans once 
again struggling with a catastrophe that caught the nation unprepared and left 
citizens dead and grieving.The ground zero ceremony paused for moments of 
silence at 8:46 a.m., the time at which a hijacked jetliner crashed into the 
north tower, at 9:03 am., the moment a second plane struck the south tower, at 
9:59 a.m., when the south tower fell and at 10:29 a.m., when the second tower 
collapsed.Federal Emergency Management Agency chief Michael Brown, who had been 
leading the relief effort, was recalled to Washington on Thursday night by 
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. Some people stocked up on 
groceries during the weekend even though Wilmington, on the coast of southeast 
North Carolina, had breezy, partly cloudy weather, said Warren Lee, emergency 
management director for New Hanover County."One of the things we talked about 
today was a single coordinating mechanism so I could take all those different 
forces that are flowing into a parish and make sure they were being put to the 
highest priorities of those parish residents and the presidents," he said.By 2 
p.m. EDT, Ophelia was centered 260 miles east-southeast of Charleston, S.C., 
and about 250 miles south of Cape Hatteras with maximum sustained wind at 80 
mph, the National Hurricane Center said. It had meandered slightly but 
essentially was stationary after following a wandering course since it became a 
tropical storm Wednesday off the coast of Florida.In New Orleans, New York 
firefighters helping with the relief effort gathered around a makeshift 
memorial for their fallen comrades, accepting the gift of a bell from a nearby 
church whose steeple was destroyed in the storm. (Full story)And in 
southwestern Pennsylvania, about 1,000 people attended a memorial service in 
the field where Flight 93 crashed after it was hijacked by terrorists.The Army 
Corps of Engineers revised Saturday its timetable for draining the floodwaters 
from New Orleans, saying the process should be completed in October. The corps 
said 32 of the 148 pumps in and around the city were operating as of noon 
Saturday, and Allen said pumping capacity is his top priority. (Full 
story)Federal Emergency Management Agency chief Michael Brown, who had been 
leading the relief effort, was recalled to Washington on Thursday night by 
Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. Chaos inside, outside the levee 
wallsAllen declined to describe specifics of the plan to reporters, but said, 
"I think we know how to move forward from here." "We got a lot of good people 
on the ground here that are with FEMA and with the state agencies," he said. 
"They wear their badges, and they look good. But unfortunately, we just not 
have seen all the assets and all the resources that we need in our 
city."Hurricane Katrina had barreled into the Gulf of Mexico, and Mayfield's 
latest forecast had it smashing into New Orleans as a Category 4 or 5 storm 
Monday morning. Maestri already had 10,000 body bags in his parish, in case he 
ever got a call like this.Earlier, the president observed a moment of silence 
on the south lawn of the White House for victims of the terrorist attacks on 
September 11, 2001."The big thing is going to be what happens when the testing 
comes back -- the test results from the water that we sampled," he said. 
Compounding the natural catastrophe was a man-made one: the inability of the 
federal, state and local governments to work together in the face of a disaster 
long foretold.As the floodwaters recede and t

Bug#311597: Busy at work packaging anyterm

[Roberto C. Sanchez]

Phil,

I am busy working on packaging anyterm.  I was wondering if you could
look at the desicussion we had on #debian-devel tonight.  Essentially,
we need to figure out a better way to make the login process happen.
Also, why does anygetty need to write to utmp instead of letting login
do that?

Please let me know what you think, as I would really like to get this
packaged up and in the official archive.

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto


irc.log.bz2
Description: Binary data


pgpPlxnPvbuyO.pgp
Description: PGP signature